Relative Intelligence · Enterprise Software

How Oracle (ORCL) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ORCL alone. It places ORCL (Oracle Corporation) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ORCL stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ORCL's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowORCL has gone against the market, falling 25.6% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. The slide is ORCL's own: it is 59.5% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?ORCL's 8.4% gain over the past 3 months is part of a broader enterprise software rally: the enterprise software ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0%, with MSFT (Microsoft, up 32.5%) and PLTR (Palantir Technologies, up 42.8%). Its enterprise software peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SAP rose 44.6%, while DDOG (Datadog) fell 2.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, ORCL fell 52.1% while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (33.3% against 89.3%). Even so, ORCL lagged its enterprise software peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termORCL turned $10,000 into $40,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, year by year, ORCL has outpaced the S&P 500 62% of the time since 1997. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, ORCL has typically fallen 1.2 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, ORCL fell 31.0%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than IBM (International Business Machines, 16.7%) but less than PLTR (Palantir Technologies, 63.1%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, ORCL has a correlation of 0.60 over 5 years, more closely than 90% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- GOOG (Alphabet), MSFT (Microsoft) and IBM (International Business Machines) earned more than ORCL with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against 7.7% a year at 44.3%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, semiconductors) and V (Visa, payment processing) earned more than ORCL with less volatility over the past 5 years. TSM returned 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 7.7% a year at 44.3%.
- Whole market
- 1,076 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ORCL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in ORCL have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ORCL over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ORCL over the same span and ORCL's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in ORCL at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $284,972 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the seven other investments on the chart ended ahead of ORCL, and AMZN finished highest, at $11,484,924.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 211 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ORCL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 2 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- INTU$591,451+5,815% total · +15.1% a year
- MSFT$508,386+4,984% total · +14.5% a year
- ADBE$386,385+3,764% total · +13.4% a year
- ADI$385,909+3,759% total · +13.4% a year
- ORCL$284,972+2,750% total · +12.2% a year
- SAP$136,626+1,266% total · +9.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- IBM$86,041+760% total · +7.7% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,232 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ORCL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- DELL$112,363+1,024% total · +62.2% a year
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- IBM$20,049+100% total · +14.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- ORCL$16,857+68.6% total · +11.0% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
- NOW$10,768+7.7% total · +1.5% a year
ORCL at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- ORCL is still 59.5% below its all-time high.
- ORCL's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 84.2%, from September 2000 to June 2002. It took about 12 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, ORCL's best was 1999, when it returned 290%, and its worst was 2001, when it lost 52.5%. It lost money in nine of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $396B
- Industry
- Software - Infrastructure
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −52.1%total return
- Past 3 years
- +33.3%+10.1% a year
- Past 5 years
- +45.1%+7.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +300%+14.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +290%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −52.5%2001
- Losing years
- 9 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 44.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.38return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −84.2%Sep 2000 to Jun 2002
- From its all-time high
- −59.5%below the peak
ORCL against the whole market
Where ORCL ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ORCL rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ORCL on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ORCL stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- ORCL's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 5% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ORCL | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −52.1% | 3,128 of 3,287 | bottom 6% |
| 3-year return | +33.3% | 1,795 of 3,017 | bottom 42% |
| 5-year return | +45.1% | 1,144 of 2,893 | top 40% |
| 10-year return | +300% | 587 of 2,202 | top 27% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 44.3% | 1,666 of 2,893 | bottom 43% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.38 | 1,279 of 2,893 | top 44% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −64.6% | 1,074 of 2,187 | top 49% |
What has beaten ORCL on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ORCL sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ORCL with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 631 stocks and 445 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ORCL over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 30% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half ORCL's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 44% less than ORCL's 44.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.38 for ORCL. INSW earned the most, 56.5% a year, while still swinging less than ORCL (40.5% against 44.3%).
- Among ORCL's popular alternatives, GOOG, IBM and MSFT are in the region. GOOG earned 19.0% a year against 7.7% a year for ORCL, at 32.0% volatility, 28% less than ORCL's 44.3%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ORCL; faint dots are 93 more of the 1,076 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than ORCL?
Investments that beat ORCL over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ORCL's popular alternatives, GOOG, MSFT and IBM earned more than ORCL with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against 7.7% a year at 44.3%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TSM (semiconductors) and V (payment processing) earned more than ORCL with less volatility over the past 5 years. TSM returned 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 7.7% a year at 44.3%.
- Across the whole market, 1,076 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ORCL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ORCL over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ORCL's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ORCL follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ORCL's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ORCL's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ORCL's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ORCL?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +7.7% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | +300% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.60 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ORCL. 11 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.61 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +151% | 0.54 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +205% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +548% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.52 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Enterprise Software and Software and the categories next to it (Application Software, IT Services, Cybersecurity, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus ORCL's specific themes. 57 of 133 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.32 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.39 | — | ||
CPAYCorpay, Inc. · Payment Processing | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +8.2% | 32.5% | 0.41 | −50.1% | +137% | 0.26 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,578 of 3,480 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.11 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.03 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.58 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.60 | 0.03% | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.34 | 0.05% | ||
What these numbers mean for ORCL
- Annual return
- ORCL returned 7.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $14,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ORCL's volatility over the past 5 years was 44.3%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ORCL's return lands within 44.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ORCL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.38, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ORCL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ORCL's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 64.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 64.6% fall takes a 182% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ORCL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ORCL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ORCL holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,076 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ORCL with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with ORCL | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.11 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.03 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.45 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.11 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.58 | 0.03% | |
| 6 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.60 | 0.03% | |
| 7 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.13 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.07 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.30 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.06 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.16 | — | |
| 12 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.22 | 0.48% |
| 13 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.04 | 0.40% |
| 14 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | -0.08 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.11 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.31 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.15 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.61 | 0.18% | |
| 19 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.02 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | -0.01 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.51 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.01 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | -0.01 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | -0.04 | — | |
| 25 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.21 | — |
| 26 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.27 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.37 | 0.03% | |
| 28 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.13 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | -0.05 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.16 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +521% | 0.47 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.34 | 0.03% | |
| 33 | Whole market | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +627% | 0.36 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.21 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.46 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.01 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.12 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.22 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | -0.06 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.09 | 0.40% | |
| 41 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.22 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.70 | 0.09% | |
| 43 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | -0.06 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.15 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.16 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +15.1% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | +234% | 0.32 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 0.03 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +13.5% | 29.3% | 0.58 | −49.6% | +446% | 0.26 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | -0.08 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | -0.07 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.28 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.00 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.00 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +20.4% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | +657% | 0.36 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.34 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.12 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.12 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.47 | 0.04% | |
| 59 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | -0.05 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.22 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.12 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +352% | 0.12 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.01 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.26 | 0.06% | |
| 65 | Whole market | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.20 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +9.8% | 25.2% | 0.50 | −39.4% | +60.7% | 0.18 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.10 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.26 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.23 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +12.2% | 29.0% | 0.54 | −37.5% | +464% | 0.11 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.28 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.09 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.15 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.52 | 0.06% | |
| 75 | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | +170% | 0.05 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.26 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.06 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +12.9% | 20.8% | 0.69 | −51.6% | +184% | 0.16 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.11 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +12.0% | 33.2% | 0.51 | −47.8% | +186% | 0.33 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +426% | 0.18 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +14.1% | 30.1% | 0.59 | −54.7% | +513% | 0.08 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.9% | 0.56 | −44.1% | +103% | 0.13 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.00 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +19.9% | 29.0% | 0.77 | −44.0% | +444% | 0.19 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.28 | — | |
| 87 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.57 | 0.79% |
| 88 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.15 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +18.1% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | +312% | 0.14 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.24 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +510% | 0.13 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +9.2% | 23.5% | 0.49 | −55.0% | +318% | -0.01 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | -0.08 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | -0.06 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +12.7% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | +309% | 0.40 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +9.5% | 24.5% | 0.49 | −37.6% | +95.1% | -0.09 | — | |
| 97 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.03 | — |
| 98 | Whole market | +11.8% | 22.6% | 0.61 | −39.2% | +118% | 0.11 | — | |
| 99 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.54 | 0.85% |
| 100 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | 0.33 | — |
ORCL against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ORCL, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ORCL's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ORCL, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Five of the 20 popular alternatives, led by GOOG, IBM and MSFT, were both more rewarding and calmer than ORCL over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, ORCL returned 7.7% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (44.3% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than ORCL with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | +55.2% | 54.4% |
| PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | +51.4% | 67.0% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | +16.6% | 30.5% |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | +13.5% | 49.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| SAP SAP SE | +11.5% | 30.0% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | +10.1% | 59.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| ORCL This pageOracle Corporation | +7.7% | 44.3% |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | +6.6% | 27.8% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | +1.9% | 45.5% |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | −0.9% | 62.6% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | −3.2% | 39.4% |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | −5.9% | 41.7% |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | −6.2% | 71.1% |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | −9.4% | 39.1% |
| ESTC Elastic N.V. | −10.7% | 60.4% |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | −16.5% | 38.1% |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | −20.6% | 57.6% |
Has ORCL consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ORCL with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ORCL helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- 11 of the 20 popular alternatives, led by MSFT, NVDA and DELL, outperformed ORCL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- MSFT, NVDA and DELL outperformed ORCL in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- DELL, GOOG and IBM earned more for the risk they took than ORCL (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ORCL over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ORCL Oracle Corporation (this page) | — | −11.4% | +8.4% | −25.6% | −32.1% | −52.1% | +33.3% | +45.1% | +300% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $396B | — |
| MSFT QualifiedMicrosoft Corporation | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| NVDA QualifiedNVIDIA Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| DELL QualifiedDell Technologies Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −19.6% | +21.3% | +127% | +265% | +217% | +636% | +800% | +3,701% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | — | $294B | — |
| GOOG QualifiedAlphabet Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | +752% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| AMZN QualifiedAmazon.com, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| NOW QualifiedServiceNow, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +8.6% | +42.8% | +50.0% | +1.4% | −18.5% | +37.8% | +9.8% | +848% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | — | $155B | — |
| SAP QualifiedSAP SE | 5/5 short2/3 long | +9.4% | +44.6% | +29.6% | −2.1% | −16.6% | +81.3% | +72.6% | +205% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | — | $267B | — |
| IBM QualifiedInternational Business Machines Corporation | 5/5 short2/3 long | +4.3% | +14.4% | −3.3% | −15.3% | −12.5% | +93.5% | +116% | +151% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | — | $228B | — |
| NTNX QualifiedNutanix, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | −2.6% | +23.8% | +68.0% | +34.8% | −0.1% | +90.0% | +88.3% | +139% | 49.2% | 0.50 | −80.4% | — | $18B | — |
| PLTR QualifiedPalantir Technologies Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +5.2% | +42.8% | +32.0% | +14.7% | +6.1% | +1,096% | +695% | — | 67.0% | 0.95 | −84.6% | — | $443B | — |
| DDOG QualifiedDatadog, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +4.6% | −2.6% | +97.6% | +91.7% | +64.1% | +198% | +61.4% | — | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | $92B | — |
| SNOW Software - ApplicationSnowflake Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | −5.8% | +16.5% | +112% | +47.5% | +30.1% | +116% | −4.3% | — | 62.6% | 0.29 | −73.0% | — | $113B | — |
| EQIX REIT - SpecialtyEquinix, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −6.6% | −2.5% | −9.7% | +31.2% | +22.2% | +49.1% | +37.4% | +226% | 27.8% | 0.37 | −41.8% | — | $97B | — |
| HUBS Software - ApplicationHubSpot, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +17.2% | +8.4% | +9.1% | −34.4% | −44.5% | −41.6% | −68.5% | +377% | 57.6% | -0.11 | −80.0% | — | $13B | — |
| CRM Software - ApplicationSalesforce, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +2.5% | +39.7% | +30.7% | −3.8% | −3.9% | +21.3% | −14.8% | +240% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | — | $200B | — |
| ADBE Software - ApplicationAdobe Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +2.9% | +9.4% | +3.3% | −23.0% | −25.2% | −52.5% | −59.4% | +135% | 38.1% | -0.28 | −71.9% | — | $100B | — |
| WDAY Software - ApplicationWorkday, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +6.3% | +38.6% | +59.4% | −0.9% | −15.4% | −3.4% | −26.4% | +132% | 41.7% | 0.06 | −63.4% | — | $49B | — |
| ESTC Software - ApplicationElastic N.V. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +6.6% | +52.4% | +95.3% | +31.8% | +14.1% | +20.1% | −43.3% | — | 60.4% | 0.11 | −76.8% | — | $10B | — |
| MDB Software - InfrastructureMongoDB, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | −10.1% | +13.2% | +38.6% | −8.4% | +11.8% | +5.7% | −27.4% | — | 71.1% | 0.26 | −76.5% | — | $29B | — |
| INTU Software - ApplicationIntuit Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +10.8% | +14.6% | −16.4% | −46.0% | −48.9% | −32.1% | −38.8% | +237% | 39.1% | -0.06 | −68.2% | — | $90B | — |
How did ORCL do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where ORCL ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ORCL and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- ORCL finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, MDB came out ahead of ORCL most often, in six of the eight years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ORCL finished in the top quarter in five of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in seven. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 21.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ORCL; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ORCL among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ORCL | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORCL This pageOracle Corporation | — | +18.1% | +60.0% | +30.9% | −4.7% | +36.9% | +24.3% | +19.4% | −3.0% | +24.9% | +6.9% | −17.6% | +19.0% | +15.7% | +31.8% | −17.5% | +28.6% | +39.4% | −21.4% | +31.7% | +40.4% | −11.0% | +3.6% | +22.6% | −21.8% | −52.5% | +3.7% | +290% | +93.5% | −19.9% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 29 | 7 of 21 | 4 of 21 | 19 of 21 | 2 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 15 of 19 | 13 of 18 | 13 of 17 | 15 of 16 | 9 of 14 | 14 of 14 | 7 of 13 | 10 of 13 | 6 of 11 | 10 of 11 | 4 of 11 | 9 of 11 | 2 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 10 of 11 | 6 of 9 | 6 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 9 of 9 | 3 of 8 | 1 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 6 of 6 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 17 of 29 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% | +5.8% | −4.5% | −6.5% | +60.5% | −44.4% | +20.8% | +15.8% | −1.0% | +9.2% | +6.2% | −22.0% | +52.8% | −62.9% | +68.4% | +115% | +56.5% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 19 of 26 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% | −11.0% | −10.0% | −17.6% | +131% | −76.3% | +37.9% | +102% | +55.2% | +1.6% | +102% | −82.8% | +308% | +39.6% | — | — | — |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 5 of 9 | +11.2% | +53.0% | +95.9% | −26.6% | +51.3% | +42.6% | +5.1% | +8.6% | +47.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 13 of 21 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% | +29.1% | −1.0% | +35.6% | +1.7% | +44.5% | −6.0% | +58.5% | +9.5% | +8.8% | −4.2% | +101% | −55.5% | +50.2% | +11.1% | +115% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 18 of 28 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% | −16.0% | +178% | +74.6% | −30.5% | −79.6% | +42.2% | +968% | — |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 8 of 13 | −27.8% | +50.0% | +82.0% | −40.2% | +17.9% | +95.0% | +58.6% | +36.5% | +75.4% | −14.1% | +27.6% | +21.2% | +86.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SAP SAP SE | 12 of 29 | −0.4% | +61.3% | +52.3% | −24.2% | +9.2% | −1.3% | +36.4% | −10.0% | +31.7% | +11.1% | +15.3% | −18.6% | +10.0% | +55.8% | +6.0% | +9.8% | +31.4% | −28.0% | −2.6% | +18.7% | +2.8% | +7.0% | +114% | −38.7% | −4.9% | −35.1% | +45.1% | +38.0% | +138% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 11 of 29 | +38.2% | +39.3% | +21.9% | +10.6% | +16.6% | −1.2% | +23.6% | −22.6% | −4.9% | +25.2% | −11.4% | −12.4% | −0.2% | +5.9% | +27.4% | +14.2% | +58.7% | −20.8% | +12.8% | +19.8% | −15.8% | +7.2% | +20.5% | −35.4% | +43.1% | −20.8% | +17.6% | +77.5% | +39.3% |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −15.5% | +28.3% | +83.1% | −18.2% | 0.0% | +1.9% | −24.8% | +17.9% | +32.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 3 of 5 | +135% | +340% | +167% | −64.7% | −22.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −4.8% | +17.7% | +65.1% | −58.7% | +80.9% | +161% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 2 of 5 | +42.1% | −22.4% | +38.6% | −57.6% | +20.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 14 of 25 | −16.9% | +19.4% | +25.4% | −21.1% | +20.3% | +24.2% | +68.9% | −20.4% | +29.2% | +20.7% | +42.3% | +32.8% | −13.9% | +103% | +24.8% | −23.4% | +99.6% | −47.4% | +33.7% | +85.5% | −4.6% | +51.5% | +395% | −93.9% | −33.7% | — | — | — | — |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 7 of 11 | −42.4% | +20.0% | +101% | −56.1% | +66.3% | +150% | +26.1% | +42.2% | +88.1% | −16.5% | +67.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 11 of 21 | −20.2% | +27.8% | +98.5% | −47.8% | +14.2% | +36.8% | +18.7% | +34.0% | +49.3% | −12.7% | +32.2% | +7.5% | +31.3% | +65.8% | −23.2% | +79.0% | +130% | −49.0% | +72.0% | +13.7% | +88.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 19 of 29 | −21.3% | −25.5% | +77.3% | −40.6% | +13.4% | +51.6% | +45.8% | +29.1% | +70.2% | +9.6% | +29.2% | +21.4% | +58.9% | +33.3% | −8.2% | −16.3% | +72.8% | −50.2% | +3.9% | +11.3% | +17.9% | +60.7% | +57.9% | −20.0% | −46.6% | +73.2% | +188% | +13.8% | +11.1% |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 6 of 13 | −16.8% | −6.5% | +65.0% | −38.8% | +14.0% | +45.7% | +3.0% | +57.0% | +53.9% | −17.1% | −2.4% | −1.9% | +52.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ESTC Elastic N.V. | 2 of 7 | −23.9% | −12.1% | +119% | −58.2% | −15.8% | +127% | −10.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 6 of 8 | +80.3% | −43.1% | +108% | −62.8% | +47.4% | +173% | +57.2% | +182% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 16 of 29 | +6.1% | +1.2% | +61.8% | −39.1% | +70.3% | +46.1% | +34.1% | +25.9% | +39.2% | +20.2% | +5.9% | +22.1% | +29.7% | +14.3% | +7.0% | +60.4% | +29.2% | −24.7% | +3.6% | +14.5% | +21.1% | −16.7% | +12.6% | +9.7% | +8.5% | −34.2% | +148% | +75.8% | +30.9% |
Risk and diversification
How ORCL has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ORCL's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ORCL's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of ORCL's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ORCL fell 64.6% from September 2025 to July 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 14.5%.
- The slowest recovery came after ORCL fell 84.2% from September 2000 to June 2002; it did not regain that peak until December 2014, 12 years later.
Green means ORCL fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ORCL fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −84.2% | −30.1% | Sep 2000 | Jun 2002 | 21 months | Dec 2014 | 12.5 years |
| No named crash | −80.9% | — | Mar 1990 | Oct 1990 | 7 months | Dec 1992 | 2.2 years |
| No named crash | −64.6% | +14.5% | Sep 2025 | Jul 2026 | 10 months | Not yet | — |
| No named crash | −56.1% | +2.0% | Aug 1997 | Jan 1998 | 5 months | Dec 1998 | 11 months |
| No named crash | −55.0% | — | Oct 1987 | Oct 1987 | Under a month | Jun 1988 | 8 months |
How did ORCL do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ORCL, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than ORCL in most of the crashes they both traded through.
- ORCL fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when ORCL fell 84.2% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ORCL.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORCL This pageOracle Corporation | — | −5.0% | −31.0% | −28.3% | −17.2% | −6.6% | −16.1% | −23.9% | −2.1% | −41.1% | −84.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 5 of 10 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0 of 10 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 0 of 5 | −5.7% | −43.6% | −45.9% | −28.6% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 4 of 9 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −7.2% | −39.9% | −28.8% | −20.6% | −8.5% | −47.6% | — | — | — | — |
| SAP SAP SE | 3 of 10 | −2.0% | −41.9% | −32.6% | −25.0% | −6.9% | −13.3% | −25.0% | −1.4% | −49.6% | −87.9% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 5 of 10 | −2.0% | −16.7% | −37.3% | −29.1% | −6.3% | −23.3% | −14.6% | −1.5% | −44.3% | −58.3% |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −7.0% | −55.9% | −66.6% | −22.6% | −4.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0 of 2 | −9.6% | −63.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −9.5% | −53.0% | −38.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.8% | −64.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −4.1% | −36.3% | −25.1% | −22.8% | −6.3% | −15.8% | −22.5% | −1.1% | −69.9% | — |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −8.4% | −53.8% | −47.3% | −24.8% | −6.8% | −53.8% | — | — | — | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −5.3% | −42.7% | −35.7% | −24.8% | −6.1% | −34.2% | −26.9% | −4.2% | −70.5% | — |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 4 of 10 | −6.2% | −50.3% | −25.6% | −25.5% | −5.4% | −22.7% | −23.6% | −0.2% | −66.7% | −79.9% |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −2.8% | −47.0% | −42.4% | −17.3% | −5.8% | −42.3% | — | — | — | — |
| ESTC Elastic N.V. | 0 of 3 | −11.5% | −54.4% | −40.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −15.1% | −61.3% | −45.0% | −24.9% | −2.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 3 of 10 | −6.0% | −42.7% | −36.3% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −24.8% | −18.0% | −3.4% | −38.3% | −66.0% |
How closely does ORCL move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ORCL with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- DELL took just 43% of the S&P 500's losses, against 159% for ORCL, while still keeping 154% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, ORCL captured 131% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 159% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.30. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Seven of the 15 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ORCL's 0.82, led by DELL, NVDA and NOW.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ORCL's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORCL This pageOracle Corporation | 131% | 159% | 0.82 | 1.30 |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 154% | 43% | 3.59 | 1.13 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 114% | 79% | 1.45 | 0.97 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 132% | 110% | 1.20 | 1.12 |
| EQIX Equinix, Inc. | 76% | 66% | 1.14 | 0.67 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 121% | 149% | 0.81 | 1.46 |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 115% | 143% | 0.80 | 1.16 |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 99% | 126% | 0.79 | 1.03 |
| NTNX Nutanix, Inc. | 68% | 91% | 0.75 | 1.20 |
| SAP SAP SE | 112% | 152% | 0.74 | 1.10 |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 89% | 121% | 0.73 | 0.95 |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 96% | 139% | 0.70 | 1.19 |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 123% | 184% | 0.67 | 1.24 |
What diversifies ORCL?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ORCL's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ORCL with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ORCL into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+11.0% for ORCL alone, +14.1% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of ORCL over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.22 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in five of the nine calendar years in which ORCL lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ORCL lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ORCL and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORCL Oracle Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +45.1% | 0.38 | −4.7% | −3.0% | −17.6% | −17.5% | −21.4% | −11.0% | −21.8% | −52.5% | −19.9% | 46.5% | +11.0% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.04 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.3% | +14.1% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.22 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 37.8% | +15.9% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.21 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.9% | +13.7% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.17 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −3.0% | −0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.8% | +13.1% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.48 | +62.9% | 0.99 | −5.6% | −4.8% | +4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 38.0% | +12.6% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.46 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +6.8% | −44.7% | +10.8% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 40.8% | +17.7% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.31 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | −9.5% | +4.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.9% | +13.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.09 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +17.8% | — | — | — | 37.6% | +14.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORCL Oracle Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +45.1% | 0.38 | −4.7% | −3.0% | −17.6% | −17.5% | −21.4% | −11.0% | −21.8% | −52.5% | −19.9% | 46.5% | +11.0% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.03 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | +18.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +29.1% | 37.7% | +18.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.38 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.2% | −65.1% | −25.6% | — | 43.0% | +29.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.29 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +20.1% | −9.4% | +73.7% | — | 40.7% | +26.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.01 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +64.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +96.3% | 37.5% | +17.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.13 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 38.6% | +20.3% |
Common questions
What was ORCL's worst drawdown?
ORCL's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 84.2%, from September 2000 to June 2002. It took about 12 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were ORCL's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, ORCL's best year was 1999, when it returned 290%. Its worst was 2001, with a return of -52.5%.
Is there a better investment than ORCL?
Among ORCL's popular alternatives, GOOG, MSFT and IBM earned more than ORCL with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against 7.7% a year at 44.3%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TSM (semiconductors) and V (payment processing) earned more than ORCL with less volatility over the past 5 years. TSM returned 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 7.7% a year at 44.3%.
Is ORCL more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ORCL's volatility over the past 5 years was 44.3%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ORCL's return lands within 44.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ORCL's Sharpe ratio?
ORCL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.38, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ORCL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ORCL with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ORCL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ORCL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ORCL holding.
What are the best alternatives to ORCL?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, 11 outperformed ORCL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: MSFT, NVDA and DELL.
Did ORCL outperform the S&P 500?
ORCL finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +18.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ORCL do in stock market crashes?
ORCL fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when ORCL fell 84.2% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies ORCL?
These had a low correlation with ORCL over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.04), DXJ (correlation 0.22) and EMLP (correlation 0.21); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.03), CLS (correlation 0.38) and FIX (correlation 0.29). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ORCL's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ORCL's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.