Relative Intelligence · Enterprise Software

How Salesforce (CRM) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CRM alone. It places CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CRM stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: CRM's full trading record, from June 2004 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, CRM rose 39.7% against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. That said, CRM is 33.1% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?CRM's 39.7% gain over the past 3 months far outran its industry: the enterprise software ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its enterprise software peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: TEAM (Atlassian) rose 129%, while ORCL (Oracle) rose 8.4%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsCRM has gone against the market, falling 3.9% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (21.3% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termCRM turned $10,000 into $34,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, CRM has typically fallen 1.6 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, CRM has a correlation of 0.48 over 5 years, more closely than 68% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, CRM's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.16: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.1 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.4 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- GOOG (Alphabet), MSFT (Microsoft) and SAP earned more than CRM with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against a loss of 3.2% a year at 39.4%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CIBR (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF, cybersecurity) and EXLS (ExlService, IT services) earned more than CRM with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against a loss of 3.2% a year at 39.4%.
- Whole market
- 1,964 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CRM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in CRM have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CRM over the past 22 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CRM over the same span and CRM's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: CRM began trading on June 23, 2004, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust. It covers the most recent 22 years of CRM's record, starting at the end of September 2004.
- $10,000 invested in CRM at the end of September 2004 would have grown to $597,836 by September 2026, more than the $102,174 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CRM, and MNST finished highest, at $3,313,296.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2004 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 45 of the 1,487 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CRM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MNST$3M+33,033% total · +30.2% a year
- AMZN$1M+12,113% total · +24.4% a year
- GOOG$1M+10,548% total · +23.6% a year
- APH$945,432+9,354% total · +23.0% a year
- NEU$663,860+6,539% total · +21.0% a year
- CRM$597,836+5,878% total · +20.4% a year
- MSFT$302,092+2,921% total · +16.8% a year
- ORCL$153,352+1,434% total · +13.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$102,174+922% total · +11.1% a year
- SAP$74,592+646% total · +9.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,813 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CRM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- DDOG$19,374+93.7% total · +14.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- SAP$16,715+67.2% total · +10.8% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
- SNOW$11,228+12.3% total · +2.3% a year
- NOW$10,768+7.7% total · +1.5% a year
- TWLO$9,166−8.3% total · −1.7% a year
- CRM$8,626−13.7% total · −2.9% a year
CRM at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: CRM began trading on June 23, 2004, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust.
- CRM is still 33.1% below its all-time high.
- CRM's deepest decline since it began trading in 2004 was 70.5%, from June to November 2008. It took 13 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 21 full calendar years, CRM's best was 2009, when it returned 130%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 49.0%. It lost money in five of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $200B
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Price history from
- June 2004
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −3.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +21.3%+6.6% a year
- Past 5 years
- −14.8%−3.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +240%+13.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +130%2009
- Worst calendar year
- −49.0%2008
- Losing years
- 5 of 21full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 39.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.12return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −70.5%Jun 2008 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −33.1%below the peak
CRM against the whole market
Where CRM ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does CRM rank among all stocks?
This section ranks CRM on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how CRM stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- CRM lands in the broad middle of the market on every measure here. CRM's 10-year return ranks in the top 34% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | CRM | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −3.9% | 2,143 of 3,287 | bottom 36% |
| 3-year return | +21.3% | 1,999 of 3,017 | bottom 35% |
| 5-year return | −14.8% | 1,943 of 2,893 | bottom 34% |
| 10-year return | +240% | 740 of 2,202 | top 34% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 39.4% | 1,428 of 2,893 | top 49% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.12 | 2,075 of 2,893 | bottom 29% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −58.7% | 829 of 2,187 | top 38% |
What has beaten CRM on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). CRM sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than CRM with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,016 stocks and 948 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CRM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 54% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half CRM's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 37% less than CRM's 39.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.12 for CRM. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than CRM (33.4% against 39.4%).
- Among CRM's popular alternatives, GOOG, MSFT and SAP are in the region. GOOG earned 19.0% a year against a loss of 3.2% a year for CRM, at 32.0% volatility, 19% less than CRM's 39.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to CRM; faint dots are 86 more of the 1,964 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than CRM?
Investments that beat CRM over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among CRM's popular alternatives, GOOG, MSFT and SAP earned more than CRM with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against a loss of 3.2% a year at 39.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIBR (cybersecurity) and EXLS (IT services) earned more than CRM with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against a loss of 3.2% a year at 39.4%.
- Across the whole market, 1,964 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CRM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat CRM over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks CRM's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than CRM follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than CRM's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× CRM's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than CRM's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with CRM?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −3.2% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | +240% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.48 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against CRM. 9 of 23 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.27 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.60 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +205% | 0.71 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +548% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +10.1% | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | 0.31 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +7.7% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | +300% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Enterprise Software and Software and the categories next to it (Application Software, IT Services, Cybersecurity, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus CRM's specific themes. 55 of 127 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.51 | 0.58% | |
EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc. · IT Services | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +10.6% | 32.6% | 0.47 | −51.3% | +327% | 0.42 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | 0.03 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | −2.8% | 22.7% | -0.01 | −46.5% | +145% | 0.43 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,257 of 3,483 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.06 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.08 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +2.6% | 30.6% | 0.24 | −43.2% | +306% | 0.38 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +2.5% | 22.1% | 0.23 | −36.9% | +281% | 0.06 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.47 | 0.03% | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.20 | 0.48% | |
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +1,196% | 0.05 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatility | −3.8% | 29.1% | 0.01 | −43.8% | +232% | 0.40 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for CRM
- Annual return
- CRM lost 3.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $8,520. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- CRM's volatility over the past 5 years was 39.4%, 2.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CRM's return lands within 39.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- CRM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.12, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CRM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- CRM's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 58.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 58.7% fall takes a 142% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, CRM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.48 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CRM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CRM holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,964 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than CRM with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with CRM | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.06 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.08 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +2.6% | 30.6% | 0.24 | −43.2% | +306% | 0.38 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +2.5% | 22.1% | 0.23 | −36.9% | +281% | 0.06 | — | |
| 5 | EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +12.0% | 27.1% | 0.56 | −35.6% | +349% | 0.25 | — |
| 6 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.00 | — |
| 7 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Same or nearby category | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.51 | 0.58% |
| 8 | CHEChemed Corporation · Health Care Services | Whole market | +3.4% | 25.3% | 0.26 | −42.9% | +273% | 0.07 | — |
| 9 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.01 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.35 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.47 | 0.03% | |
| 12 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.02 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.11 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +2.2% | 29.4% | 0.23 | −50.4% | +307% | 0.06 | — | |
| 15 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.20 | 0.48% |
| 16 | Whole market | +4.5% | 33.9% | 0.30 | −44.3% | +182% | 0.30 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.29 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.51 | 0.18% | |
| 19 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.20 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.08 | — | |
| 21 | HPQHP Inc. · Computer Hardware | Whole market | +5.7% | 37.3% | 0.33 | −51.2% | +207% | 0.36 | — |
| 22 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.02 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.08 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.10 | — | |
| 25 | SEICSEI Investments Company · Asset Management | Whole market | +12.7% | 22.3% | 0.65 | −51.8% | +168% | 0.39 | — |
| 26 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | -0.01 | — | |
| 27 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.25 | — |
| 28 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | 0.34 | — |
| 29 | Whole market | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.22 | 0.09% | |
| 30 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.10 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.52 | 0.09% | |
| 32 | SJMThe J. M. Smucker Company · Packaged Foods | Whole market | +4.8% | 25.1% | 0.32 | −38.1% | +37.2% | 0.05 | — |
| 33 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | -0.09 | — | |
| 34 | MSMMSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +13.3% | 25.1% | 0.63 | −48.2% | +184% | 0.07 | — |
| 35 | Whole market | +8.7% | 35.7% | 0.41 | −28.7% | +257% | -0.14 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.35 | 0.04% | |
| 37 | Whole market | +2.9% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | +366% | 0.37 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.24 | 0.06% | |
| 39 | SAICScience Applications International Corporation · Business Services | Whole market | +9.9% | 30.7% | 0.46 | −45.9% | +135% | 0.25 | — |
| 40 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.07 | — | |
| 41 | SXTSensient Technologies Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +9.3% | 30.3% | 0.44 | −50.6% | +133% | 0.11 | — |
| 42 | Whole market | +6.4% | 26.1% | 0.37 | −44.0% | +253% | 0.18 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.13 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.13 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.00 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.36 | — | |
| 47 | HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +12.6% | 25.8% | 0.59 | −38.7% | +373% | 0.55 | 0.60% |
| 48 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.04 | — | |
| 49 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.06 | — |
| 50 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.18 | 0.20% |
| 51 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.19 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.61 | 0.04% | |
| 53 | CNXNPC Connection, Inc. · Technology Distributors | Whole market | +15.8% | 29.2% | 0.65 | −41.8% | +277% | 0.28 | — |
| 54 | SKYYFirst Trust Cloud Computing ETF · Technology | Whole market | +7.5% | 31.4% | 0.39 | −53.2% | +396% | 0.75 | 0.60% |
| 55 | Whole market | +5.4% | 21.8% | 0.35 | −34.3% | +240% | 0.37 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.3% | 0.71 | −34.1% | +293% | 0.45 | 0.15% | |
| 57 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.02 | — | |
| 58 | EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc. · IT Services | Same or nearby category | +10.6% | 32.6% | 0.47 | −51.3% | +327% | 0.42 | — |
| 59 | IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +470% | 0.10 | — |
| 60 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | -0.04 | — |
| 61 | Whole market | +3.1% | 27.1% | 0.25 | −42.5% | +300% | 0.14 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.44 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +12.5% | 31.3% | 0.53 | −37.1% | +303% | 0.13 | — | |
| 64 | BUGGlobal X - Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +7.1% | 30.4% | 0.38 | −41.7% | — | 0.50 | 0.50% |
| 65 | SAFTSafety Insurance Group, Inc. · Insurance - Property & Casualty | Whole market | +10.6% | 28.5% | 0.49 | −32.8% | +138% | 0.10 | — |
| 66 | Whole market | +6.1% | 20.0% | 0.40 | −31.6% | +270% | 0.14 | — | |
| 67 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.30 | 0.20% |
| 68 | Popular alternative | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.27 | — | |
| 69 | IHFiShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +3.1% | 19.3% | 0.26 | −35.2% | +171% | 0.10 | 0.37% |
| 70 | VRSNVeriSign, Inc. · Internet Services | Whole market | +7.8% | 25.9% | 0.42 | −38.9% | +308% | 0.30 | — |
| 71 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.22 | 0.59% |
| 72 | MTDMettler-Toledo International Inc. · Life Sciences Tools | Whole market | +2.6% | 32.5% | 0.24 | −43.5% | +298% | 0.23 | — |
| 73 | Popular alternative | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.60 | — | |
| 74 | MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +10.9% | 22.1% | 0.58 | −34.1% | +336% | 0.20 | 0.15% |
| 75 | HSTMHealthStream, Inc. · Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Whole market | +3.9% | 29.4% | 0.28 | −42.7% | +32.0% | 0.12 | — |
| 76 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | -0.10 | — |
| 77 | Same or nearby category | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.02 | — | |
| 78 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.46 | 0.40% |
| 79 | CRVLCorVel Corporation · Insurance | Whole market | +7.0% | 33.2% | 0.37 | −64.2% | +594% | 0.44 | — |
| 80 | Same or nearby category | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +424% | 0.03 | — | |
| 81 | FCFSFirstCash Holdings, Inc · Consumer Finance | Whole market | +20.6% | 30.5% | 0.77 | −50.2% | +422% | 0.04 | — |
| 82 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.04 | — | |
| 83 | MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.1% | 18.4% | 0.57 | −33.3% | +276% | 0.55 | 0.46% |
| 84 | ESEESCO Technologies Inc. · Electronic Instruments | Whole market | +24.2% | 31.1% | 0.85 | −46.0% | +473% | -0.09 | — |
| 85 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.17 | — | |
| 86 | Same or nearby category | +14.8% | 37.2% | 0.56 | −34.2% | +1,139% | 0.38 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.27 | — | |
| 88 | SCIService Corporation International · Death Care | Whole market | +7.5% | 25.2% | 0.41 | −34.0% | +272% | 0.29 | — |
| 89 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.47 | 0.40% |
| 90 | GGGGraco Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +3.5% | 22.9% | 0.26 | −30.6% | +263% | 0.26 | — |
| 91 | NYTThe New York Times Company · Media | Whole market | +6.2% | 30.6% | 0.35 | −49.9% | +559% | 0.14 | — |
| 92 | USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +35.6% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | +803% | 0.26 | — |
| 93 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.43 | 0.50% |
| 94 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.16 | — | |
| 95 | STNStantec Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +7.5% | 25.7% | 0.41 | −40.9% | +240% | 0.39 | — |
| 96 | GATXGATX Corporation · Equipment Rental | Whole market | +12.4% | 25.1% | 0.59 | −38.3% | +329% | 0.16 | — |
| 97 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.12 | 0.40% |
| 98 | CSWCSW Industrials, Inc. · Industrial Products | Whole market | +17.1% | 34.4% | 0.63 | −46.2% | +867% | 0.32 | — |
| 99 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | -0.06 | — | |
| 100 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.47 | 0.69% |
CRM against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against CRM, compared period by period and year by year.
How do CRM's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at CRM, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- 12 of the 23 popular alternatives earned less than CRM over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Four of the 23 popular alternatives, led by GOOG, MSFT and SAP, were both more rewarding and calmer than CRM over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, CRM returned -3.2% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (39.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than CRM with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| SAP SAP SE | +11.5% | 30.0% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | +10.1% | 59.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | +7.7% | 44.3% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | +1.9% | 45.5% |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | −0.9% | 62.6% |
| CRM This pageSalesforce, Inc. | −3.2% | 39.4% |
| ACN Accenture plc | −5.2% | 32.7% |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | −5.9% | 41.7% |
| TWLO Twilio Inc. | −6.7% | 61.1% |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | −9.4% | 39.1% |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | −10.9% | 53.0% |
| TEAM Atlassian Corporation | −11.6% | 63.9% |
| NICE NICE Ltd. | −16.1% | 41.4% |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | −16.5% | 38.1% |
| ZM Zoom Communications, Inc. | −18.8% | 44.3% |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | −20.6% | 57.6% |
| DOCU DocuSign, Inc. | −21.6% | 58.8% |
| MNDY monday.com Ltd. | −22.8% | 71.0% |
| FIVN Five9, Inc. | −26.4% | 57.9% |
| SPT Sprout Social, Inc. | −36.9% | 68.5% |
| ASAN Asana, Inc. | −39.3% | 79.3% |
Has CRM consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares CRM with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than CRM helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Six of the 24 popular alternatives, led by NOW, MSFT and DDOG, outperformed CRM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- NOW outperformed CRM in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- GOOG, MSFT and SAP earned more for the risk they took than CRM (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than CRM over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. (this page) | — | +2.5% | +39.7% | +30.7% | −3.8% | −3.9% | +21.3% | −14.8% | +240% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | — | $200B | — |
| NOW QualifiedServiceNow, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +8.6% | +42.8% | +50.0% | +1.4% | −18.5% | +37.8% | +9.8% | +848% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | — | $155B | — |
| MSFT QualifiedMicrosoft Corporation | 3/5 short3/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| DDOG QualifiedDatadog, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +4.6% | −2.6% | +97.6% | +91.7% | +64.1% | +198% | +61.4% | — | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | $92B | — |
| TWLO QualifiedTwilio Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −2.8% | +26.0% | +77.6% | +87.0% | +137% | +385% | −29.4% | +486% | 61.1% | 0.19 | −90.4% | — | $40B | — |
| SAP QualifiedSAP SE | 3/5 short2/3 long | +9.4% | +44.6% | +29.6% | −2.1% | −16.6% | +81.3% | +72.6% | +205% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | — | $267B | — |
| SNOW QualifiedSnowflake Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −5.8% | +16.5% | +112% | +47.5% | +30.1% | +116% | −4.3% | — | 62.6% | 0.29 | −73.0% | — | $113B | — |
| GOOG Internet Content & InformationAlphabet Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | +752% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| ORCL Software - InfrastructureOracle Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | −11.4% | +8.4% | −25.6% | −32.1% | −52.1% | +33.3% | +45.1% | +300% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $396B | — |
| TEAM Software - ApplicationAtlassian Corporation | 5/5 short1/3 long | +13.0% | +129% | +209% | +42.9% | +39.2% | +18.2% | −46.0% | +670% | 63.9% | 0.12 | −87.5% | — | $56B | — |
| DOCU Software - ApplicationDocuSign, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +17.1% | +53.5% | +68.3% | +23.8% | +13.6% | +99.4% | −70.4% | — | 58.8% | -0.11 | −87.6% | — | $15B | — |
| ZM Software - ApplicationZoom Communications, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +7.2% | +7.2% | +7.6% | +17.0% | +19.0% | +57.9% | −64.7% | — | 44.3% | -0.25 | −90.3% | — | $28B | — |
| HUBS Software - ApplicationHubSpot, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +17.2% | +8.4% | +9.1% | −34.4% | −44.5% | −41.6% | −68.5% | +377% | 57.6% | -0.11 | −80.0% | — | $13B | — |
| PEGA Software - ApplicationPegasystems Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +3.7% | +14.7% | −16.9% | −35.0% | −33.5% | +85.1% | −43.7% | +140% | 53.0% | 0.04 | −79.2% | — | $6.0B | — |
| BRZE Software - ApplicationBraze, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +79.4% | +74.0% | +92.0% | +40.0% | +65.6% | +4.1% | — | — | — | — | −83.2% | — | $5.2B | — |
| SPT Software - ApplicationSprout Social, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +21.4% | +49.1% | +117% | +21.2% | +16.1% | −72.2% | −90.0% | — | 68.5% | -0.32 | −96.5% | — | $760M | — |
| ACN Information Technology ServicesAccenture plc | 3/5 short0/3 long | +29.5% | +66.5% | +25.1% | −4.8% | +2.2% | −13.6% | −23.6% | +146% | 32.7% | 0.00 | −67.8% | — | $146B | — |
| FIVN Software - ApplicationFive9, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −7.3% | +33.5% | +111% | +82.4% | +53.0% | −42.9% | −78.4% | +141% | 57.9% | -0.24 | −93.5% | — | $2.6B | — |
| WDAY Software - ApplicationWorkday, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +6.3% | +38.6% | +59.4% | −0.9% | −15.4% | −3.4% | −26.4% | +132% | 41.7% | 0.06 | −63.4% | — | $49B | — |
| ASAN Software - ApplicationAsana, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +12.6% | +41.3% | +70.7% | −17.1% | −26.5% | −41.5% | −91.7% | — | 79.3% | -0.24 | −96.2% | — | $2.5B | — |
| MNDY Software - Applicationmonday.com Ltd. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +14.7% | +31.4% | +47.4% | −29.7% | −45.8% | −23.6% | −72.6% | — | 71.0% | -0.01 | −86.8% | — | $4.3B | — |
| INTU Software - ApplicationIntuit Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +10.8% | +14.6% | −16.4% | −46.0% | −48.9% | −32.1% | −38.8% | +237% | 39.1% | -0.06 | −68.2% | — | $90B | — |
| NICE Software - ApplicationNICE Ltd. | 1/5 short0/3 long | 0.0% | +13.0% | +8.5% | +2.3% | −13.4% | −26.8% | −58.5% | +71.8% | 41.4% | -0.22 | −73.6% | — | $6.7B | — |
| ADBE Software - ApplicationAdobe Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +2.9% | +9.4% | +3.3% | −23.0% | −25.2% | −52.5% | −59.4% | +135% | 38.1% | -0.28 | −71.9% | — | $100B | — |
How did CRM do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2005, along with where CRM ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with CRM and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: CRM began trading on June 23, 2004, so the table starts with 2005, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CRM finished in the top quarter in six of 21 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 14 of 25.
- CRM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 11 of its 21 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, NOW came out ahead of CRM most often, in nine of the 13 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of CRM; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places CRM among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of CRM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM This pageSalesforce, Inc. | — | −20.2% | +27.8% | +98.5% | −47.8% | +14.2% | +36.8% | +18.7% | +34.0% | +49.3% | −12.7% | +32.2% | +7.5% | +31.3% | +65.8% | −23.2% | +79.0% | +130% | −49.0% | +72.0% | +13.7% | +88.9% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 21 | 14 of 25 | 9 of 25 | 2 of 25 | 12 of 25 | 13 of 23 | 17 of 21 | 16 of 18 | 7 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 12 of 16 | 6 of 15 | 8 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 1 of 11 | 11 of 11 | 1 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 9 of 11 | 2 of 11 | 8 of 11 | 2 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10 of 21 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 9 of 13 | −27.8% | +50.0% | +82.0% | −40.2% | +17.9% | +95.0% | +58.6% | +36.5% | +75.4% | −14.1% | +27.6% | +21.2% | +86.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 11 of 21 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% | +5.8% | −4.5% | −6.5% | +60.5% | −44.4% | +20.8% | +15.8% | −1.0% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −4.8% | +17.7% | +65.1% | −58.7% | +80.9% | +161% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TWLO Twilio Inc. | 4 of 9 | +31.6% | +42.4% | +55.0% | −81.4% | −22.2% | +244% | +10.1% | +278% | −18.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SAP SAP SE | 8 of 21 | −0.4% | +61.3% | +52.3% | −24.2% | +9.2% | −1.3% | +36.4% | −10.0% | +31.7% | +11.1% | +15.3% | −18.6% | +10.0% | +55.8% | +6.0% | +9.8% | +31.4% | −28.0% | −2.6% | +18.7% | +2.8% |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 2 of 5 | +42.1% | −22.4% | +38.6% | −57.6% | +20.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 10 of 21 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% | +29.1% | −1.0% | +35.6% | +1.7% | +44.5% | −6.0% | +58.5% | +9.5% | +8.8% | −4.2% | +101% | −55.5% | +50.2% | +11.1% | +115% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 12 of 21 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 10 of 21 | +18.1% | +60.0% | +30.9% | −4.7% | +36.9% | +24.3% | +19.4% | −3.0% | +24.9% | +6.9% | −17.6% | +19.0% | +15.7% | +31.8% | −17.5% | +28.6% | +39.4% | −21.4% | +31.7% | +40.4% | −11.0% |
| TEAM Atlassian Corporation | 5 of 10 | −33.4% | +2.3% | +84.8% | −66.3% | +63.0% | +94.3% | +35.2% | +95.5% | +89.0% | −20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DOCU DocuSign, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −23.9% | +51.3% | +7.3% | −63.6% | −31.5% | +200% | +84.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ZM Zoom Communications, Inc. | 2 of 6 | +5.7% | +13.5% | +6.2% | −63.2% | −45.5% | +396% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 6 of 11 | −42.4% | +20.0% | +101% | −56.1% | +66.3% | +150% | +26.1% | +42.2% | +88.1% | −16.5% | +67.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | 10 of 21 | +28.4% | +91.0% | +43.1% | −69.3% | −16.0% | +67.5% | +66.8% | +1.8% | +31.6% | +31.5% | +33.0% | −15.1% | +118% | −22.5% | −19.5% | +8.2% | +177% | +4.3% | +22.9% | +36.8% | −14.0% |
| BRZE Braze, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −18.1% | −21.2% | +94.8% | −64.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPT Sprout Social, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −63.3% | −50.0% | +8.8% | −37.7% | +99.7% | +183% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ACN Accenture plc | 8 of 21 | −22.1% | +1.9% | +33.6% | −34.8% | +60.7% | +26.0% | +51.2% | −6.2% | +33.3% | +14.3% | +20.8% | +11.4% | +26.6% | +27.7% | +12.0% | +19.1% | +29.0% | −7.5% | −1.4% | +29.3% | +8.3% |
| FIVN Five9, Inc. | 6 of 11 | −50.7% | −48.4% | +16.0% | −50.6% | −21.3% | +166% | +50.0% | +75.7% | +75.3% | +63.1% | +94.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 6 of 13 | −16.8% | −6.5% | +65.0% | −38.8% | +14.0% | +45.7% | +3.0% | +57.0% | +53.9% | −17.1% | −2.4% | −1.9% | +52.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ASAN Asana, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −32.4% | +6.6% | +38.0% | −81.5% | +152% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MNDY monday.com Ltd. | 0 of 4 | −37.3% | +25.4% | +53.9% | −60.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 10 of 21 | +6.1% | +1.2% | +61.8% | −39.1% | +70.3% | +46.1% | +34.1% | +25.9% | +39.2% | +20.2% | +5.9% | +22.1% | +29.7% | +14.3% | +7.0% | +60.4% | +29.2% | −24.7% | +3.6% | +14.5% | +21.1% |
| NICE NICE Ltd. | 8 of 21 | −33.4% | −14.9% | +3.8% | −36.7% | +7.1% | +82.8% | +43.4% | +17.7% | +34.0% | +21.1% | +14.4% | +25.6% | +23.9% | −2.8% | −1.3% | +12.4% | +38.1% | −34.5% | +11.5% | +27.8% | +54.0% |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 8 of 21 | −21.3% | −25.5% | +77.3% | −40.6% | +13.4% | +51.6% | +45.8% | +29.1% | +70.2% | +9.6% | +29.2% | +21.4% | +58.9% | +33.3% | −8.2% | −16.3% | +72.8% | −50.2% | +3.9% | +11.3% | +17.9% |
Risk and diversification
How CRM has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were CRM's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents CRM's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2004, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: CRM began trading on June 23, 2004, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of CRM's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CRM fell 58.7% from December 2024 to June 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 25.0%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 15 months, after CRM fell 58.6% from November 2021 to December 2022.
Green means CRM fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | CRM fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −70.5% | −37.6% | Jun 2008 | Nov 2008 | 5 months | Dec 2009 | 13 months |
| No named crash | −58.7% | +25.0% | Dec 2024 | Jun 2026 | 18 months | Not yet | — |
| 2022 bear market | −58.6% | −16.7% | Nov 2021 | Dec 2022 | 13 months | Mar 2024 | 15 months |
| No named crash | −48.8% | −3.2% | Jan 2006 | Jul 2006 | 6 months | Nov 2006 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −44.1% | −6.6% | Jun 2004 | Aug 2004 | 2 months | Oct 2004 | 2 months |
How did CRM do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far CRM, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: CRM began trading on June 23, 2004, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- CRM fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when CRM fell 34.2% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, ACN held up best, falling less than CRM in all nine crashes they both traded through.
- CRM began trading after the dot-com bust, but eight of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was MSFT's 62.9%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than CRM.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM This pageSalesforce, Inc. | — | −5.3% | −42.7% | −35.7% | −24.8% | −6.1% | −34.2% | −26.9% | −4.2% | −70.5% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −7.2% | −39.9% | −28.8% | −20.6% | −8.5% | −47.6% | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 8 of 9 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −9.5% | −53.0% | −38.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TWLO Twilio Inc. | 0 of 5 | −12.3% | −73.7% | −44.0% | −27.1% | −6.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SAP SAP SE | 7 of 9 | −2.0% | −41.9% | −32.6% | −25.0% | −6.9% | −13.3% | −25.0% | −1.4% | −49.6% | −87.9% |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.8% | −64.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 8 of 9 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 7 of 9 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 7 of 9 | −5.0% | −31.0% | −28.3% | −17.2% | −6.6% | −16.1% | −23.9% | −2.1% | −41.1% | −84.2% |
| TEAM Atlassian Corporation | 1 of 5 | −12.4% | −53.1% | −21.4% | −30.2% | −7.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| DOCU DocuSign, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −24.3% | −71.2% | −24.9% | −29.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ZM Zoom Communications, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −2.6% | −59.2% | −14.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −8.4% | −53.8% | −47.3% | −24.8% | −6.8% | −53.8% | — | — | — | — |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | 3 of 9 | −6.6% | −72.2% | −38.3% | −30.3% | −7.7% | −31.1% | −35.7% | −0.8% | −32.6% | −91.7% |
| BRZE Braze, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −9.0% | −57.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPT Sprout Social, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −10.3% | −52.0% | −36.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ACN Accenture plc | 9 of 9 | −4.7% | −37.3% | −33.5% | −22.6% | −4.1% | −14.9% | −22.7% | −1.9% | −35.7% | — |
| FIVN Five9, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −7.2% | −60.5% | −28.3% | −20.5% | −4.2% | −29.6% | — | — | — | — |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −2.8% | −47.0% | −42.4% | −17.3% | −5.8% | −42.3% | — | — | — | — |
| ASAN Asana, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −9.5% | −77.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MNDY monday.com Ltd. | 0 of 2 | −12.9% | −68.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 5 of 9 | −6.0% | −42.7% | −36.3% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −24.8% | −18.0% | −3.4% | −38.3% | −66.0% |
| NICE NICE Ltd. | 8 of 9 | −4.7% | −37.6% | −35.2% | −11.7% | −3.8% | −21.0% | −26.2% | −1.2% | −57.0% | −91.6% |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 6 of 9 | −6.2% | −50.3% | −25.6% | −25.5% | −5.4% | −22.7% | −23.6% | −0.2% | −66.7% | −79.9% |
How closely does CRM move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares CRM with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Eight of the 16 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CRM's 0.80, led by NOW, MSFT and GOOG.
- NOW took just 79% of the S&P 500's losses, against 143% for CRM, while still keeping 114% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, CRM captured 115% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 143% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.16. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than CRM's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM This pageSalesforce, Inc. | 115% | 143% | 0.80 | 1.16 |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 114% | 79% | 1.45 | 0.97 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 132% | 110% | 1.20 | 1.12 |
| TEAM Atlassian Corporation | 130% | 132% | 0.99 | 1.03 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| TWLO Twilio Inc. | 119% | 129% | 0.92 | 1.44 |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 131% | 159% | 0.82 | 1.30 |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 121% | 149% | 0.81 | 1.46 |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 99% | 126% | 0.79 | 1.03 |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | 87% | 113% | 0.77 | 1.05 |
| SAP SAP SE | 112% | 152% | 0.74 | 1.10 |
| FIVN Five9, Inc. | 85% | 114% | 0.74 | 1.05 |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 96% | 139% | 0.70 | 1.19 |
| NICE NICE Ltd. | 65% | 94% | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 123% | 184% | 0.67 | 1.24 |
| ACN Accenture plc | 117% | 186% | 0.63 | 1.12 |
What diversifies CRM?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with CRM's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing CRM with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in CRM into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-2.9% for CRM alone, +2.1% for the mix).
- GLD made money in four of the five calendar years in which CRM lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of CRM over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.20 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which CRM lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% CRM and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2016 | 2011 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −14.8% | 0.12 | −20.2% | −47.8% | −12.7% | −23.2% | −49.0% | 41.3% | −2.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.12 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | — | — | — | 33.4% | +2.1% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.20 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | +1.1% | −16.1% | −20.8% | 33.7% | +3.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.10 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | +29.8% | — | — | 33.5% | +1.9% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.12 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +7.1% | +15.9% | — | — | 33.5% | +1.3% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.27 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | +35.6% | +6.8% | −44.7% | 35.6% | +5.8% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.30 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | −5.1% | +6.3% | — | — | 33.8% | +1.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.16 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | +8.0% | +9.6% | +4.9% | 33.8% | +2.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.22 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −10.4% | +7.4% | — | — | 34.2% | +2.9% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2016 | 2011 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −14.8% | 0.12 | −20.2% | −47.8% | −12.7% | −23.2% | −49.0% | 41.3% | −2.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.02 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −17.5% | +8.1% | −39.6% | 33.6% | +6.1% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.17 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | +7.4% | −24.4% | −20.5% | 36.9% | +17.1% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.07 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +18.3% | −17.0% | −15.2% | 34.8% | +13.9% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.02 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.3% | +11.8% | −40.4% | 33.6% | +5.5% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.08 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | +0.7% | — | — | 34.2% | +7.9% |
Common questions
What was CRM's worst drawdown?
CRM's deepest decline since it began trading in 2004 was 70.5%, from June to November 2008. It took 13 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because CRM launched in June 2004, that record does not include the dot-com bust.
What were CRM's best and worst years?
Over 21 full calendar years, CRM's best year was 2009, when it returned 130%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -49.0%.
Is there a better investment than CRM?
Among CRM's popular alternatives, GOOG, MSFT and SAP earned more than CRM with less volatility over the past 5 years. GOOG returned 19.0% a year at 32.0% volatility, against a loss of 3.2% a year at 39.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIBR (cybersecurity) and EXLS (IT services) earned more than CRM with less volatility over the past 5 years. CIBR returned 14.1% a year at 26.1% volatility, against a loss of 3.2% a year at 39.4%.
Is CRM more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. CRM's volatility over the past 5 years was 39.4%, 2.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CRM's return lands within 39.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is CRM's Sharpe ratio?
CRM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.12, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CRM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is CRM with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, CRM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.48 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CRM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CRM holding.
What are the best alternatives to CRM?
Of the 24 popular alternatives we compared, six outperformed CRM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: NOW, MSFT and DDOG.
Did CRM outperform the S&P 500?
CRM finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 11 of 21 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -20.2%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did CRM do in stock market crashes?
CRM fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when CRM fell 34.2% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies CRM?
These had a low correlation with CRM over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.12), DXJ (correlation 0.20) and EMLP (correlation 0.10); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.02), CLS (correlation 0.17) and FIX (correlation 0.07). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than CRM's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of CRM's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.