Relative Intelligence · Enterprise Software

How ServiceNow (NOW) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on NOW alone. It places NOW (ServiceNow, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where NOW stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: NOW's full trading record, from June 2012 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, NOW rose 50.0% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. On the flip side, NOW is 36.1% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?NOW's 42.8% gain over the past 3 months far outran its industry: the enterprise software ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its enterprise software peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: TEAM (Atlassian) rose 129%, while ORCL (Oracle) rose 8.4%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsNOW has gone against the market, falling 18.5% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. The same gap shows up over 3 years (37.8% against 89.3%). A ahead of 94% of stocks worth at least $300 million over 10 years, but behind 57% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 3 years. By year ↓
- Long termNOW turned $10,000 into $94,800 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. That said, over 5 years NOW trailed the index: 9.8% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashNOW fell harder than the S&P 500 in three of four sell-offs. The Covid crash was the exception: NOW fell 28.8%, less than the S&P 500's 33.7%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 10 years, NOW's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.97: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.1 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 79% as much. Against the S&P 500, NOW has a correlation of 0.38 over 5 years, less closely than 53% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- SAP, MSFT (Microsoft) and IBM (International Business Machines) earned more than NOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. SAP returned 11.5% a year at 30.0% volatility, against 1.9% a year at 45.5%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- UMC (United Microelectronics, semiconductors) and PTC (application software) earned more than NOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. UMC returned 19.9% a year at 43.2% volatility, against 1.9% a year at 45.5%.
- Whole market
- 1,740 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NOW with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in NOW have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in NOW over the past 14 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of NOW over the same span and NOW's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: NOW began trading on June 29, 2012, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 14 years of NOW's record, starting at the end of September 2012.
- $10,000 invested in NOW at the end of September 2012 would have grown to $173,131 by September 2026, more than the $67,346 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of NOW, and PANW finished highest, at $387,235.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2012 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 119 of the 2,213 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NOW; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- PANW$387,235+3,772% total · +29.8% a year
- FTNT$370,856+3,609% total · +29.4% a year
- LLY$323,653+3,137% total · +28.2% a year
- UMC$224,693+2,147% total · +24.9% a year
- MSFT$217,246+2,072% total · +24.6% a year
- NOW$173,131+1,631% total · +22.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$67,346+573% total · +14.6% a year
- ORCL$53,391+434% total · +12.7% a year
- SAP$36,309+263% total · +9.6% a year
- IBM$18,556+85.6% total · +4.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,373 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of NOW; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- IBM$20,049+100% total · +14.9% a year
- DDOG$19,374+93.7% total · +14.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- ORCL$16,857+68.6% total · +11.0% a year
- SAP$16,715+67.2% total · +10.8% a year
- BOX$14,144+41.4% total · +7.2% a year
- SNOW$11,228+12.3% total · +2.3% a year
- NOW$10,768+7.7% total · +1.5% a year
- DOCU$2,608−73.9% total · −23.6% a year
NOW at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: NOW began trading on June 29, 2012, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- NOW is still 36.1% below its all-time high.
- NOW's deepest decline since it began trading in 2012 was 64.5%, from January 2025 to April 2026. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over 13 full calendar years, NOW's best was 2020, when it returned 95.0%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 40.2%. It lost money in three of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $155B
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Price history from
- June 2012
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −18.5%total return
- Past 3 years
- +37.8%+11.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +9.8%+1.9% a year
- Past 10 years
- +848%+25.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +95.0%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −40.2%2022
- Losing years
- 3 of 13full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 45.5%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.27return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −64.5%Jan 2025 to Apr 2026
- From its all-time high
- −36.1%below the peak
NOW against the whole market
Where NOW ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does NOW rank among all stocks?
This section ranks NOW on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how NOW stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- NOW's 10-year return ranks in the top 6% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
- NOW's 1-year return ranks in the bottom 21% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | NOW | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −18.5% | 2,606 of 3,287 | bottom 22% |
| 3-year return | +37.8% | 1,732 of 3,017 | bottom 44% |
| 5-year return | +9.8% | 1,593 of 2,893 | bottom 46% |
| 10-year return | +848% | 138 of 2,202 | top 6% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 45.5% | 1,726 of 2,893 | bottom 41% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.27 | 1,653 of 2,893 | bottom 44% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −64.5% | 1,070 of 2,187 | top 49% |
What has beaten NOW on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). NOW sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than NOW with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 969 stocks and 771 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than NOW over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 48% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half NOW's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 46% less than NOW's 45.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.27 for NOW. ATI earned the most, 61.8% a year, while still swinging less than NOW (42.9% against 45.5%).
- Among NOW's popular alternatives, IBM, MSFT and SAP are in the region. IBM earned 16.6% a year against 1.9% a year for NOW, at 30.5% volatility, 33% less than NOW's 45.5%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to NOW; faint dots are 88 more of the 1,740 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than NOW?
Investments that beat NOW over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among NOW's popular alternatives, SAP, MSFT and IBM earned more than NOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. SAP returned 11.5% a year at 30.0% volatility, against 1.9% a year at 45.5%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, UMC (semiconductors) and PTC (application software) earned more than NOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. UMC returned 19.9% a year at 43.2% volatility, against 1.9% a year at 45.5%.
- Across the whole market, 1,740 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than NOW with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat NOW over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks NOW's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than NOW follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than NOW's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× NOW's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than NOW's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with NOW?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +1.9% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | +848% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.38 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against NOW. 6 of 25 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +205% | 0.69 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +16.6% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | +151% | 0.40 | — | ||
BOXBox, Inc. · Enterprise Software | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +10.1% | 33.3% | 0.46 | −68.6% | +176% | 0.40 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +10.1% | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | 0.55 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +7.7% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | +300% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Enterprise Software and Software and the categories next to it (Application Software, IT Services, Cybersecurity, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus NOW's specific themes. 53 of 122 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.9% | 43.2% | 0.63 | −54.3% | +1,610% | 0.13 | — | ||
PTCPTC Inc. · Application Software | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +8.3% | 35.0% | 0.40 | −54.4% | +317% | 0.51 | — | |
EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc. · IT Services | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +10.6% | 32.6% | 0.47 | −51.3% | +327% | 0.27 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +2,626% | 0.50 | — | ||
CHKPCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd. · Cybersecurity | Similar return, lower volatility | +2.8% | 29.0% | 0.24 | −51.8% | +82.7% | 0.53 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,040 of 3,486 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.18 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.60 | — | ||
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +1,196% | 0.08 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.22 | 0.09% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.9% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | +923% | 0.01 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | -0.04 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +2.7% | 2.9% | 0.94 | −6.3% | +32.7% | 0.13 | 0.03% | ||
What these numbers mean for NOW
- Annual return
- NOW returned 1.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $11,000. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- NOW's volatility over the past 5 years was 45.5%, 2.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NOW's return lands within 45.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- NOW's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.27, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NOW earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- NOW's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 64.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 64.5% fall takes a 182% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, NOW's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.38 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NOW instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NOW holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,740 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than NOW with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with NOW | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.18 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.45 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.60 | — | |
| 4 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +1,196% | 0.08 | — |
| 5 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.08 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | -0.20 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | 0.22 | 0.09% | |
| 8 | Same or nearby category | +19.9% | 43.2% | 0.63 | −54.3% | +1,610% | 0.13 | — | |
| 9 | Popular alternative | +11.5% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | +205% | 0.69 | — | |
| 10 | HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc. · Consulting Services | Whole market | +29.7% | 40.7% | 0.84 | −51.4% | +221% | 0.13 | — |
| 11 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.09 | — | |
| 12 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.10 | 0.20% |
| 13 | PTCPTC Inc. · Application Software | Same or nearby category | +8.3% | 35.0% | 0.40 | −54.4% | +317% | 0.51 | — |
| 14 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.05 | — | |
| 15 | EXLSExlService Holdings, Inc. · IT Services | Same or nearby category | +10.6% | 32.6% | 0.47 | −51.3% | +327% | 0.27 | — |
| 16 | Whole market | +13.9% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | +923% | 0.01 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.40 | — | |
| 18 | BUGGlobal X - Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +7.1% | 30.4% | 0.38 | −41.7% | — | 0.71 | 0.50% |
| 19 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.11 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.38 | 0.03% | |
| 21 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | -0.23 | — | |
| 22 | Popular alternative | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.59 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.38 | 0.03% | |
| 24 | Whole market | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +548% | 0.29 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | -0.02 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | -0.07 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.06 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.10 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.20 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.06 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.22 | — | |
| 32 | VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +4.7% | 1.3% | 3.51 | −13.1% | +40.5% | 0.10 | 0.30% |
| 33 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.15 | 0.48% |
| 34 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | -0.02 | 0.40% |
| 35 | CSWCSW Industrials, Inc. · Industrial Products | Whole market | +17.1% | 34.4% | 0.63 | −46.2% | +867% | 0.24 | — |
| 36 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | -0.04 | — | |
| 37 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.37 | 0.69% |
| 38 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | -0.09 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | -0.11 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.20 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.21 | 0.05% | |
| 42 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.43 | 0.18% | |
| 43 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | -0.04 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.00 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.33 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.08 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.08 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | -0.06 | — | |
| 49 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.28 | — |
| 50 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +58.0% | 0.24 | 0.60% |
| 51 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.06 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.16 | 0.03% | |
| 53 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.03 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | -0.04 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.11 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +521% | 0.28 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.22 | 0.03% | |
| 58 | Whole market | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +627% | 0.20 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.07 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.23 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | -0.11 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.02 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.09 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.11 | 0.40% | |
| 65 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.01 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.50 | 0.09% | |
| 67 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | -0.12 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.05 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.08 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +15.1% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | +234% | 0.08 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | -0.10 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +13.5% | 29.3% | 0.58 | −49.6% | +446% | 0.23 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | -0.03 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | -0.08 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | -0.01 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.09 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | -0.25 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +8.7% | 35.7% | 0.41 | −28.7% | +257% | -0.15 | — | |
| 79 | DINOHF Sinclair Corporation · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +31.8% | 38.8% | 0.91 | −77.3% | +649% | 0.06 | — |
| 80 | Whole market | +20.4% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | +657% | 0.01 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.21 | — | |
| 82 | FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF · Floating Rate Bonds | Whole market | +4.5% | 1.8% | 2.48 | −13.5% | +35.9% | 0.04 | 0.15% |
| 83 | Whole market | +31.4% | 42.1% | 0.86 | −51.5% | +616% | -0.15 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.11 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +6.8% | 17.6% | 0.47 | −39.4% | +198% | 0.27 | 0.03% | |
| 86 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | -0.11 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.28 | 0.04% | |
| 88 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.01 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.03 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | -0.04 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +352% | 0.14 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.07 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.13 | 0.06% | |
| 94 | Whole market | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.06 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +9.8% | 25.2% | 0.50 | −39.4% | +60.7% | 0.22 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.01 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.14 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.22 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +12.2% | 29.0% | 0.54 | −37.5% | +464% | 0.00 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +7.1% | 22.9% | 0.42 | −38.7% | +295% | 0.12 | — |
NOW against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against NOW, compared period by period and year by year.
How do NOW's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at NOW, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Five of the 25 popular alternatives, led by IBM, MSFT and SAP, were both more rewarding and calmer than NOW over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, NOW returned 1.9% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (45.5% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than NOW with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | +16.6% | 30.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| SAP SAP SE | +11.5% | 30.0% |
| BOX Box, Inc. | +10.1% | 33.3% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | +10.1% | 59.7% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | +7.7% | 44.3% |
| NOW This pageServiceNow, Inc. | +1.9% | 45.5% |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | −0.9% | 62.6% |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | −1.3% | 30.2% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | −3.2% | 39.4% |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | −3.6% | 41.6% |
| ACN Accenture plc | −5.2% | 32.7% |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | −5.9% | 41.7% |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | −9.4% | 39.1% |
| INFY Infosys Limited | −9.6% | 29.8% |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | −10.9% | 53.0% |
| TEAM Atlassian Corporation | −11.6% | 63.9% |
| GTLB GitLab Inc. | −12.2% | 73.1% |
| APPN Appian Corporation | −14.4% | 62.5% |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | −16.5% | 38.1% |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | −20.6% | 57.6% |
| DOCU DocuSign, Inc. | −21.6% | 58.8% |
| MNDY monday.com Ltd. | −22.8% | 71.0% |
| PATH UiPath Inc. | −23.6% | 64.7% |
| FIVN Five9, Inc. | −26.4% | 57.9% |
| ASAN Asana, Inc. | −39.3% | 79.3% |
Has NOW consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares NOW with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than NOW helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Three of the 25 popular alternatives, BOX, SAP and DDOG, outperformed NOW in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- IBM, MSFT and SAP earned more for the risk they took than NOW (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than NOW over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. (this page) | — | +8.6% | +42.8% | +50.0% | +1.4% | −18.5% | +37.8% | +9.8% | +848% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | — | $155B | — |
| BOX QualifiedBox, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +24.2% | +35.3% | +74.4% | +44.8% | +26.2% | +73.6% | +61.5% | +176% | 33.3% | 0.46 | −68.6% | — | $5.7B | — |
| SAP QualifiedSAP SE | 3/5 short2/3 long | +9.4% | +44.6% | +29.6% | −2.1% | −16.6% | +81.3% | +72.6% | +205% | 30.0% | 0.52 | −52.5% | — | $267B | — |
| DDOG QualifiedDatadog, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +4.6% | −2.6% | +97.6% | +91.7% | +64.1% | +198% | +61.4% | — | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | $92B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 2/5 short3/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| IBM Information Technology ServicesInternational Business Machines Corporation | 1/5 short2/3 long | +4.3% | +14.4% | −3.3% | −15.3% | −12.5% | +93.5% | +116% | +151% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | — | $228B | — |
| DOCU Software - ApplicationDocuSign, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +17.1% | +53.5% | +68.3% | +23.8% | +13.6% | +99.4% | −70.4% | — | 58.8% | -0.11 | −87.6% | — | $15B | — |
| SNOW Software - ApplicationSnowflake Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −5.8% | +16.5% | +112% | +47.5% | +30.1% | +116% | −4.3% | — | 62.6% | 0.29 | −73.0% | — | $113B | — |
| ORCL Software - InfrastructureOracle Corporation | 0/5 short1/3 long | −11.4% | +8.4% | −25.6% | −32.1% | −52.1% | +33.3% | +45.1% | +300% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $396B | — |
| PEGA Software - ApplicationPegasystems Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +3.7% | +14.7% | −16.9% | −35.0% | −33.5% | +85.1% | −43.7% | +140% | 53.0% | 0.04 | −79.2% | — | $6.0B | — |
| TEAM Software - ApplicationAtlassian Corporation | 5/5 short0/3 long | +13.0% | +129% | +209% | +42.9% | +39.2% | +18.2% | −46.0% | +670% | 63.9% | 0.12 | −87.5% | — | $56B | — |
| APPN Software - InfrastructureAppian Corporation | 5/5 short0/3 long | +15.3% | +71.0% | +105% | +30.7% | +52.4% | +8.4% | −54.0% | — | 62.5% | 0.06 | −92.0% | — | $3.2B | — |
| GTLB Software - ApplicationGitLab Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +10.5% | +61.4% | +154% | +52.0% | +16.8% | +24.1% | −47.9% | — | 73.1% | 0.18 | −85.2% | — | $9.2B | — |
| DT Software - ApplicationDynatrace, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +12.8% | +42.3% | +79.6% | +50.3% | +27.0% | +37.4% | −16.9% | — | 41.6% | 0.12 | −61.8% | — | $18B | — |
| ACN Information Technology ServicesAccenture plc | 3/5 short0/3 long | +29.5% | +66.5% | +25.1% | −4.8% | +2.2% | −13.6% | −23.6% | +146% | 32.7% | 0.00 | −67.8% | — | $146B | — |
| FIVN Software - ApplicationFive9, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −7.3% | +33.5% | +111% | +82.4% | +53.0% | −42.9% | −78.4% | +141% | 57.9% | -0.24 | −93.5% | — | $2.6B | — |
| CTSH Information Technology ServicesCognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +14.8% | +53.6% | +14.6% | −14.6% | +4.5% | +9.5% | −6.2% | +56.3% | 30.2% | 0.11 | −56.1% | — | $31B | — |
| WDAY Software - ApplicationWorkday, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +6.3% | +38.6% | +59.4% | −0.9% | −15.4% | −3.4% | −26.4% | +132% | 41.7% | 0.06 | −63.4% | — | $49B | — |
| ASAN Software - ApplicationAsana, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +12.6% | +41.3% | +70.7% | −17.1% | −26.5% | −41.5% | −91.7% | — | 79.3% | -0.24 | −96.2% | — | $2.5B | — |
| HUBS Software - ApplicationHubSpot, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +17.2% | +8.4% | +9.1% | −34.4% | −44.5% | −41.6% | −68.5% | +377% | 57.6% | -0.11 | −80.0% | — | $13B | — |
| CRM Software - ApplicationSalesforce, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.5% | +39.7% | +30.7% | −3.8% | −3.9% | +21.3% | −14.8% | +240% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | — | $200B | — |
| INTU Software - ApplicationIntuit Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +10.8% | +14.6% | −16.4% | −46.0% | −48.9% | −32.1% | −38.8% | +237% | 39.1% | -0.06 | −68.2% | — | $90B | — |
| INFY Information Technology ServicesInfosys Limited | 1/5 short0/3 long | +16.3% | +11.9% | −9.0% | −28.7% | −22.4% | −18.0% | −39.8% | +110% | 29.8% | -0.19 | −54.4% | — | $52B | — |
| MNDY Software - Applicationmonday.com Ltd. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +14.7% | +31.4% | +47.4% | −29.7% | −45.8% | −23.6% | −72.6% | — | 71.0% | -0.01 | −86.8% | — | $4.3B | — |
| PATH Software - InfrastructureUiPath Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.2% | +10.4% | +27.2% | −15.4% | −15.7% | −13.5% | −74.0% | — | 64.7% | -0.09 | −89.0% | — | $7.0B | — |
| ADBE Software - ApplicationAdobe Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +2.9% | +9.4% | +3.3% | −23.0% | −25.2% | −52.5% | −59.4% | +135% | 38.1% | -0.28 | −71.9% | — | $100B | — |
How did NOW do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2013, along with where NOW ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with NOW and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: NOW began trading on June 29, 2012, so the table starts with 2013, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, NOW finished in the top quarter in eight of 13 years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 20 of 26.
- NOW finished ahead of the S&P 500 in nine of its 13 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, HUBS came out ahead of NOW most often, in six of the 11 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of NOW; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places NOW among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of NOW | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOW This pageServiceNow, Inc. | — | −27.8% | +50.0% | +82.0% | −40.2% | +17.9% | +95.0% | +58.6% | +36.5% | +75.4% | −14.1% | +27.6% | +21.2% | +86.4% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 8 of 13 | 20 of 26 | 5 of 26 | 5 of 26 | 12 of 26 | 13 of 23 | 6 of 21 | 3 of 19 | 5 of 18 | 3 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 6 of 15 | 4 of 13 | 2 of 13 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 13 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% |
| BOX Box, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −5.3% | +23.4% | −17.7% | +18.9% | +45.1% | +7.6% | −0.6% | −20.1% | +52.4% | −0.7% | — | — | — |
| SAP SAP SE | 4 of 13 | −0.4% | +61.3% | +52.3% | −24.2% | +9.2% | −1.3% | +36.4% | −10.0% | +31.7% | +11.1% | +15.3% | −18.6% | +10.0% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −4.8% | +17.7% | +65.1% | −58.7% | +80.9% | +161% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 5 of 13 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 3 of 13 | +38.2% | +39.3% | +21.9% | +10.6% | +16.6% | −1.2% | +23.6% | −22.6% | −4.9% | +25.2% | −11.4% | −12.4% | −0.2% |
| DOCU DocuSign, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −23.9% | +51.3% | +7.3% | −63.6% | −31.5% | +200% | +84.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 2 of 5 | +42.1% | −22.4% | +38.6% | −57.6% | +20.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 5 of 13 | +18.1% | +60.0% | +30.9% | −4.7% | +36.9% | +24.3% | +19.4% | −3.0% | +24.9% | +6.9% | −17.6% | +19.0% | +15.7% |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | 6 of 13 | +28.4% | +91.0% | +43.1% | −69.3% | −16.0% | +67.5% | +66.8% | +1.8% | +31.6% | +31.5% | +33.0% | −15.1% | +118% |
| TEAM Atlassian Corporation | 4 of 10 | −33.4% | +2.3% | +84.8% | −66.3% | +63.0% | +94.3% | +35.2% | +95.5% | +89.0% | −20.0% | — | — | — |
| APPN Appian Corporation | 2 of 8 | +7.4% | −12.4% | +15.7% | −50.1% | −59.8% | +324% | +43.0% | −15.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| GTLB GitLab Inc. | 0 of 4 | −33.4% | −10.5% | +38.6% | −47.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −20.3% | −0.6% | +42.8% | −36.5% | +39.5% | +71.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ACN Accenture plc | 4 of 13 | −22.1% | +1.9% | +33.6% | −34.8% | +60.7% | +26.0% | +51.2% | −6.2% | +33.3% | +14.3% | +20.8% | +11.4% | +26.6% |
| FIVN Five9, Inc. | 4 of 11 | −50.7% | −48.4% | +16.0% | −50.6% | −21.3% | +166% | +50.0% | +75.7% | +75.3% | +63.1% | +94.2% | — | — |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 3 of 13 | +9.7% | +3.5% | +34.4% | −34.5% | +9.6% | +33.9% | −1.1% | −9.7% | +27.6% | −6.7% | +14.0% | +4.3% | +36.7% |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 3 of 13 | −16.8% | −6.5% | +65.0% | −38.8% | +14.0% | +45.7% | +3.0% | +57.0% | +53.9% | −17.1% | −2.4% | −1.9% | +52.6% |
| ASAN Asana, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −32.4% | +6.6% | +38.0% | −81.5% | +152% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 6 of 11 | −42.4% | +20.0% | +101% | −56.1% | +66.3% | +150% | +26.1% | +42.2% | +88.1% | −16.5% | +67.5% | — | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 4 of 13 | −20.2% | +27.8% | +98.5% | −47.8% | +14.2% | +36.8% | +18.7% | +34.0% | +49.3% | −12.7% | +32.2% | +7.5% | +31.3% |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 4 of 13 | +6.1% | +1.2% | +61.8% | −39.1% | +70.3% | +46.1% | +34.1% | +25.9% | +39.2% | +20.2% | +5.9% | +22.1% | +29.7% |
| INFY Infosys Limited | 4 of 13 | −16.4% | +23.1% | +4.8% | −27.3% | +51.9% | +68.3% | +11.8% | +21.8% | +12.3% | −9.6% | +9.0% | +13.6% | +36.3% |
| MNDY monday.com Ltd. | 0 of 4 | −37.3% | +25.4% | +53.9% | −60.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PATH UiPath Inc. | 2 of 4 | +28.9% | −48.8% | +95.4% | −70.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 3 of 13 | −21.3% | −25.5% | +77.3% | −40.6% | +13.4% | +51.6% | +45.8% | +29.1% | +70.2% | +9.6% | +29.2% | +21.4% | +58.9% |
Risk and diversification
How NOW has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were NOW's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents NOW's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2012, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: NOW began trading on June 29, 2012, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of NOW's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: NOW fell 64.5% from January 2025 to April 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 14.0%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 14 months, after NOW fell 51.3% from November 2021 to October 2022.
Green means NOW fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | NOW fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −64.5% | +14.0% | Jan 2025 | Apr 2026 | 15 months | Not yet | — |
| 2022 bear market | −51.3% | −22.3% | Nov 2021 | Oct 2022 | 11 months | Dec 2023 | 14 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −47.6% | −11.0% | Dec 2015 | Feb 2016 | 2 months | Jan 2017 | 11 months |
| No named crash | −35.4% | +1.6% | Sep 2012 | Jan 2013 | 4 months | Apr 2013 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −34.5% | +0.1% | Mar 2014 | Apr 2014 | 1 month | Jan 2015 | 9 months |
How did NOW do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far NOW, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: NOW began trading on June 29, 2012, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- NOW fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the six crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when NOW fell 47.6% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, MSFT held up best, falling less than NOW in all six crashes they both traded through.
- NOW began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but 11 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was PEGA's 32.6%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than NOW.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOW This pageServiceNow, Inc. | — | −7.2% | −39.9% | −28.8% | −20.6% | −8.5% | −47.6% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 6 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| BOX Box, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −5.7% | −29.9% | −46.0% | −34.3% | −8.9% | −40.3% | — | — | — | — |
| SAP SAP SE | 3 of 6 | −2.0% | −41.9% | −32.6% | −25.0% | −6.9% | −13.3% | −25.0% | −1.4% | −49.6% | −87.9% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −9.5% | −53.0% | −38.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 6 of 6 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 4 of 6 | −2.0% | −16.7% | −37.3% | −29.1% | −6.3% | −23.3% | −14.6% | −1.5% | −44.3% | −58.3% |
| DOCU DocuSign, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −24.3% | −71.2% | −24.9% | −29.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.8% | −64.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 5 of 6 | −5.0% | −31.0% | −28.3% | −17.2% | −6.6% | −16.1% | −23.9% | −2.1% | −41.1% | −84.2% |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | 3 of 6 | −6.6% | −72.2% | −38.3% | −30.3% | −7.7% | −31.1% | −35.7% | −0.8% | −32.6% | −91.7% |
| TEAM Atlassian Corporation | 2 of 5 | −12.4% | −53.1% | −21.4% | −30.2% | −7.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| APPN Appian Corporation | 1 of 5 | −7.4% | −40.7% | −49.7% | −33.1% | −4.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| GTLB GitLab Inc. | 0 of 2 | −11.3% | −57.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −9.2% | −46.9% | −45.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ACN Accenture plc | 4 of 6 | −4.7% | −37.3% | −33.5% | −22.6% | −4.1% | −14.9% | −22.7% | −1.9% | −35.7% | — |
| FIVN Five9, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −7.2% | −60.5% | −28.3% | −20.5% | −4.2% | −29.6% | — | — | — | — |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 4 of 6 | −5.8% | −38.6% | −40.6% | −22.4% | −3.2% | −25.3% | −26.7% | −2.5% | −65.5% | −71.3% |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −2.8% | −47.0% | −42.4% | −17.3% | −5.8% | −42.3% | — | — | — | — |
| ASAN Asana, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −9.5% | −77.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −8.4% | −53.8% | −47.3% | −24.8% | −6.8% | −53.8% | — | — | — | — |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −5.3% | −42.7% | −35.7% | −24.8% | −6.1% | −34.2% | −26.9% | −4.2% | −70.5% | — |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 3 of 6 | −6.0% | −42.7% | −36.3% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −24.8% | −18.0% | −3.4% | −38.3% | −66.0% |
| INFY Infosys Limited | 5 of 6 | −4.9% | −35.9% | −39.1% | −12.7% | −3.6% | −17.3% | −25.9% | −0.6% | −60.9% | −90.0% |
| MNDY monday.com Ltd. | 0 of 2 | −12.9% | −68.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PATH UiPath Inc. | 0 of 2 | −10.1% | −72.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 4 of 6 | −6.2% | −50.3% | −25.6% | −25.5% | −5.4% | −22.7% | −23.6% | −0.2% | −66.7% | −79.9% |
How closely does NOW move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares NOW with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- None of the 16 popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than NOW's 1.45.
- Over the past 10 years, NOW captured 114% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 79% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.97. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than NOW's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOW This pageServiceNow, Inc. | 114% | 79% | 1.45 | 0.97 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| TEAM Atlassian Corporation | 130% | 132% | 0.99 | 1.03 |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 131% | 159% | 0.82 | 1.30 |
| HUBS HubSpot, Inc. | 121% | 149% | 0.81 | 1.46 |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 115% | 143% | 0.80 | 1.16 |
| INTU Intuit Inc. | 99% | 126% | 0.79 | 1.03 |
| PEGA Pegasystems Inc. | 87% | 113% | 0.77 | 1.05 |
| SAP SAP SE | 112% | 152% | 0.74 | 1.10 |
| FIVN Five9, Inc. | 85% | 114% | 0.74 | 1.05 |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 89% | 121% | 0.73 | 0.95 |
| BOX Box, Inc. | 98% | 141% | 0.70 | 1.01 |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 96% | 139% | 0.70 | 1.19 |
| INFY Infosys Limited | 85% | 126% | 0.67 | 0.90 |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 123% | 184% | 0.67 | 1.24 |
| ACN Accenture plc | 117% | 186% | 0.63 | 1.12 |
| CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 89% | 152% | 0.59 | 0.99 |
What diversifies NOW?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with NOW's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing NOW with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in NOW into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+1.5% for NOW alone, +5.7% for the mix).
- FIX made money in three of the three calendar years in which NOW lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of NOW over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.15 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which NOW lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% NOW and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2016 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +9.8% | 0.27 | −27.8% | −40.2% | −14.1% | 40.5% | +1.5% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | -0.02 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | — | 32.4% | +5.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.15 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | +1.1% | 32.9% | +7.5% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | -0.01 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | +29.8% | 32.5% | +5.6% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.03 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +7.1% | +15.9% | 32.6% | +4.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.20 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | +35.6% | 34.4% | +9.8% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.17 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | −5.1% | +6.3% | 32.8% | +5.1% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.11 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | +8.0% | 32.9% | +6.0% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.26 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −10.4% | +7.4% | 33.7% | +6.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2016 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +9.8% | 0.27 | −27.8% | −40.2% | −14.1% | 40.5% | +1.5% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.05 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −17.5% | 33.1% | +9.7% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.11 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | +7.4% | 35.5% | +21.4% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | -0.04 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +18.3% | 33.3% | +18.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.08 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.3% | 33.2% | +9.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.08 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | +0.7% | 33.5% | +11.6% |
Common questions
What was NOW's worst drawdown?
NOW's deepest decline since it began trading in 2012 was 64.5%, from January 2025 to April 2026. It has not yet climbed back to that peak. Because NOW launched in June 2012, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were NOW's best and worst years?
Over 13 full calendar years, NOW's best year was 2020, when it returned 95.0%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -40.2%.
Is there a better investment than NOW?
Among NOW's popular alternatives, SAP, MSFT and IBM earned more than NOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. SAP returned 11.5% a year at 30.0% volatility, against 1.9% a year at 45.5%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, UMC (semiconductors) and PTC (application software) earned more than NOW with less volatility over the past 5 years. UMC returned 19.9% a year at 43.2% volatility, against 1.9% a year at 45.5%.
Is NOW more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. NOW's volatility over the past 5 years was 45.5%, 2.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, NOW's return lands within 45.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is NOW's Sharpe ratio?
NOW's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.27, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so NOW earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is NOW with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, NOW's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.38 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against NOW instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a NOW holding.
What are the best alternatives to NOW?
Of the 25 popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed NOW in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: BOX, SAP and DDOG.
Did NOW outperform the S&P 500?
NOW finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in nine of 13 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -27.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did NOW do in stock market crashes?
NOW fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the six major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when NOW fell 47.6% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies NOW?
These had a low correlation with NOW over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation -0.02), DXJ (correlation 0.15) and EMLP (correlation -0.01); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.05), CLS (correlation 0.11) and FIX (correlation -0.04). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than NOW's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of NOW's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.