Relative Intelligence · Electrical Equipment

How Eaton (ETN) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ETN alone. It places ETN (Eaton Corporation plc) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ETN stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ETN's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowETN has gone against the market, falling 5.8% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 6 months, EMR (Emerson Electric) rose 10.1% and VRT (Vertiv) fell 35.2%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?Not a move of its own: the electrical equipment ETF XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF) fell 6.1% over the past 3 months, with GEV (GE Vernova, down 17.5%) and VRT (Vertiv, down 30.2%), while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its electrical equipment peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: ATKR (Atkore) rose 30.3%, while VRT fell 30.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, ETN rose 2.3% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. ETN led its electrical equipment peers in 2023, then fell behind GEV (GE Vernova) and EMR (Emerson Electric) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termETN turned $10,000 into $75,700 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. ETN's 10-year return of 657% puts it ahead of 90% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, ETN has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. That said, in the 2022 bear market, ETN held up better than VRT (Vertiv), ROK and GNRC; only HUBB (Hubbell) and NVT fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationETN is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.64 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.65 with the total US market, more closely than 95% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- TT (Trane Technologies) earned more than ETN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 22.7% a year at 27.7% volatility, against 20.4% a year at 32.1%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- PH (Parker-Hannifin, industrial machinery) and WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, industrial machinery) earned more than ETN with less volatility over the past 5 years. PH returned 27.4% a year at 28.8% volatility, against 20.4% a year at 32.1%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 53 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ETN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them XOM (Exxonmobil), ABBV (AbbVie) and HSBC.
How much would $10,000 in ETN have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ETN over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ETN over the same span and ETN's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in ETN at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $538,468 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ETN, and GILD finished highest, at $1,571,438.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 91 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ETN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- GILD$2M+15,614% total · +19.1% a year
- ROK$1M+12,857% total · +18.3% a year
- POWL$899,867+8,899% total · +16.8% a year
- AME$869,262+8,593% total · +16.6% a year
- CAT$615,591+6,056% total · +15.3% a year
- ETN$538,468+5,285% total · +14.7% a year
- MSFT$508,386+4,984% total · +14.5% a year
- TT$405,736+3,957% total · +13.6% a year
- AZZ$337,866+3,279% total · +12.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 328 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ETN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- POWL$273,283+2,633% total · +93.8% a year
- PWR$56,870+469% total · +41.6% a year
- NVT$53,086+431% total · +39.6% a year
- NPO$36,604+266% total · +29.6% a year
- PH$36,392+264% total · +29.5% a year
- WAB$34,242+242% total · +27.9% a year
- ETN$31,102+211% total · +25.5% a year
- TT$27,878+179% total · +22.8% a year
- AZZ$26,759+168% total · +21.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
ETN at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- ETN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 68.9%, from July 2007 to March 2009. It took 20 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, ETN's best was 2010, when it returned 64.0%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 47.2%. It lost money in nine of those years.
- ETN is 17.0% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $148B
- Industry
- Electrical Equipment & Parts
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +2.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +104%+26.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +153%+20.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +657%+22.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +64.0%2010
- Worst calendar year
- −47.2%2008
- Losing years
- 9 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 32.1%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.74return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −68.9%Jul 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −17.0%below the peak
ETN against the whole market
Where ETN ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ETN rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ETN on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ETN stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- ETN's 10-year return ranks in the top 10% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ETN | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +2.3% | 1,896 of 3,287 | bottom 43% |
| 3-year return | +104% | 884 of 3,017 | top 29% |
| 5-year return | +153% | 441 of 2,893 | top 15% |
| 10-year return | +657% | 211 of 2,202 | top 10% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 32.1% | 911 of 2,893 | top 31% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.74 | 372 of 2,893 | top 13% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −44.5% | 278 of 2,187 | top 13% |
What has beaten ETN on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ETN sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ETN with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 44 stocks and nine ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ETN over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half ETN's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 23% less than ETN's 32.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.74 for ETN.
- Among ETN's popular alternatives, TT is in the region. TT earned 22.7% a year against 20.4% a year for ETN, at 27.7% volatility, 14% less than ETN's 32.1%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ETN; faint dots are 42 more of the 53 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than ETN?
Investments that beat ETN over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ETN's popular alternatives, TT earned more than ETN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 22.7% a year at 27.7% volatility, against 20.4% a year at 32.1%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PH (industrial machinery) and WAB (industrial machinery) earned more than ETN with less volatility over the past 5 years. PH returned 27.4% a year at 28.8% volatility, against 20.4% a year at 32.1%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 53 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ETN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them XOM, ABBV and HSBC.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ETN over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ETN's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ETN follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ETN's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ETN's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ETN's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ETN?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +20.4% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | +657% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.64 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 4 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ETN. 4 of 17 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.79 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.76 | — | ||
NVTnVent Electric plc · Electrical Equipment | Higher return in most periods | +35.4% | 38.0% | 0.99 | −56.2% | — | 0.74 | — | |
AZZAZZ Inc. · Industrial - Specialties | Higher return in most periods | +21.8% | 33.8% | 0.76 | −68.0% | +184% | 0.61 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Electrical Equipment and the categories next to it (Industrial Machinery, Building Products, Engineering & Construction, Electric Utilities), plus ETN's specific themes. 9 of 119 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.64 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.62 | — | ||
APGAPi Group Corporation · Engineering & Construction | Higher return in most periods | +23.0% | 31.9% | 0.81 | −49.6% | — | 0.67 | — | |
NPOEnPro Industries, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Higher return in most periods | +28.1% | 36.0% | 0.87 | −65.8% | +481% | 0.60 | — | |
FSSFederal Signal Corporation · Industrial Machinery | Higher return in most periods | +23.3% | 31.7% | 0.82 | −33.0% | +882% | 0.67 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatility | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.68 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 226 of 3,497 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.09 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.35 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | -0.06 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.09 | — | ||
ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | -0.01 | — | |
MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.23 | — | |
FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.43 | 0.19% | |
What these numbers mean for ETN
- Annual return
- ETN returned 20.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $25,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ETN's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.1%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ETN's return lands within 32.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ETN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.74, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ETN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ETN's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 44.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 44.5% fall takes a 80.3% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ETN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.64 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ETN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ETN holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 53 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ETN with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 50 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with ETN | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.35 | 0.48% |
| 2 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.17 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | -0.06 | — | |
| 4 | IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +470% | 0.58 | — |
| 5 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.19 | — | |
| 6 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.20 | — |
| 7 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.43 | 0.19% |
| 8 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.52 | 0.40% |
| 9 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.06 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.10 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.18 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.31 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.33 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.17 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.42 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.34 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.17 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.51 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.10 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.38 | — | |
| 21 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.31 | — |
| 22 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Whole market | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +180% | -0.06 | — |
| 23 | USFDUS Foods Holding Corp. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +22.7% | 29.8% | 0.84 | −77.3% | +347% | 0.46 | — |
| 24 | WESWestern Midstream Partners, LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +23.5% | 27.6% | 0.91 | −91.9% | +128% | 0.29 | — |
| 25 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.25 | — | |
| 26 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | 0.61 | — |
| 27 | Same or nearby category | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.64 | — | |
| 28 | Same or nearby category | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.62 | — | |
| 29 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.22 | — |
| 30 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.32 | — |
| 31 | Popular alternative | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.79 | — | |
| 32 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.41 | — |
| 33 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.38 | — |
| 34 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.24 | 0.59% |
| 35 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.28 | — | |
| 36 | FBIZFirst Business Financial Services, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +23.1% | 29.4% | 0.85 | −50.2% | +307% | 0.17 | — |
| 37 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.06 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | -0.01 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.56 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | 0.09 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | 0.15 | 0.08% | |
| 42 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.15 | — |
| 43 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.14 | — |
| 44 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.62 | — |
| 45 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.24 | — |
| 46 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.50 | — |
| 47 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | 0.08 | — |
| 48 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Whole market | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.47 | — |
| 49 | ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings, Inc. · Auto Parts | Whole market | +27.3% | 29.9% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +367% | 0.48 | — |
| 50 | IEOiShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.5% | 29.9% | 0.80 | −75.0% | +217% | 0.16 | 0.37% |
ETN against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ETN, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ETN's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ETN, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only TT and HUBB were both more rewarding and calmer than ETN over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, ETN returned 20.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (32.1% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than ETN with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | +87.9% | 65.8% |
| VRT Vertiv Holdings Co | +54.2% | 64.2% |
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | +39.3% | 37.2% |
| NVT nVent Electric plc | +35.4% | 38.0% |
| TT Trane Technologies plc | +22.7% | 27.7% |
| AZZ AZZ Inc. | +21.9% | 33.8% |
| HUBB Hubbell Incorporated | +21.0% | 30.0% |
| ETN This pageEaton Corporation plc | +20.4% | 32.1% |
| ENS EnerSys | +17.9% | 35.5% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | +14.4% | 22.1% |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | +12.7% | 27.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | +8.4% | 87.1% |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | +7.8% | 32.3% |
| LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | +6.7% | 35.6% |
| CARR Carrier Global Corporation | +2.2% | 32.3% |
| ATKR Atkore Inc. | +1.7% | 47.7% |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | −15.7% | 54.5% |
Has ETN consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ETN with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ETN helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Four of the 19 popular alternatives, led by PWR, TT and AZZ, outperformed ETN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- PWR and TT outperformed ETN in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- TT and HUBB earned more for the risk they took than ETN (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ETN over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc (this page) | — | −12.3% | −4.6% | −5.8% | +17.7% | +2.3% | +104% | +153% | +657% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | — | $148B | — |
| PWR QualifiedQuanta Services, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −7.2% | −5.8% | −1.5% | +35.6% | +35.3% | +263% | +425% | +2,045% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | — | $90B | — |
| TT QualifiedTrane Technologies plc | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +6.5% | −1.2% | −2.9% | +16.8% | +11.3% | +154% | +178% | +955% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | — | $102B | — |
| AZZ QualifiedAZZ Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +1.6% | −7.9% | −0.9% | +24.3% | +39.0% | +208% | +169% | +184% | 33.8% | 0.76 | −68.0% | — | $4.1B | — |
| NVT QualifiednVent Electric plc | 3/5 short2/3 long | −12.4% | −9.6% | +3.2% | +31.4% | +40.0% | +203% | +356% | — | 38.0% | 0.99 | −56.2% | — | $23B | — |
| POWL Electrical Equipment & PartsPowell Industries, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −12.1% | −27.7% | −31.7% | +40.5% | +42.0% | +578% | +2,240% | +2,510% | 65.8% | 1.27 | −68.3% | — | $6.0B | — |
| VRT Electrical Equipment & PartsVertiv Holdings Co | 1/5 short2/3 long | −18.9% | −30.2% | −35.2% | +16.0% | +16.0% | +456% | +772% | — | 64.2% | 1.01 | −71.3% | — | $78B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 4/5 short1/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| HUBB Electrical Equipment & PartsHubbell Incorporated | 2/5 short1/3 long | +0.4% | −5.0% | −15.4% | +0.1% | +7.7% | +70.6% | +159% | +442% | 30.0% | 0.79 | −41.6% | — | $24B | — |
| GNRC Industrial - MachineryGenerac Holdings Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −5.1% | −8.7% | −10.4% | +37.9% | −0.6% | +120% | −57.5% | +430% | 54.5% | -0.04 | −83.8% | — | $11B | — |
| CEG Independent Power ProducersConstellation Energy Corporation | 2/5 short1/3 long | −1.2% | +2.3% | −9.7% | −29.0% | −29.7% | +135% | — | — | — | — | −50.7% | — | $92B | — |
| AMSC Electrical Equipment & PartsAmerican Superconductor Corporation | 0/5 short1/3 long | −15.0% | −20.9% | −36.9% | −18.6% | −57.9% | +327% | +49.4% | +272% | 87.1% | 0.52 | −89.1% | — | $1.2B | — |
| AME Electrical Equipment & PartsAMETEK, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +2.5% | +5.3% | +4.8% | +18.8% | +32.8% | +78.1% | +96.1% | +481% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | — | $57B | — |
| ATKR Electrical Equipment & PartsAtkore Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +0.5% | +30.3% | +42.9% | +49.3% | +45.6% | −28.2% | +8.7% | +412% | 47.7% | 0.27 | −72.8% | — | $3.2B | — |
| EMR Industrial - MachineryEmerson Electric Co. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +5.8% | +17.9% | +10.1% | +19.5% | +25.0% | +84.9% | +82.1% | +309% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | — | $90B | — |
| LFUS Hardware, Equipment & PartsLittelfuse, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −6.3% | −4.3% | −2.4% | +47.0% | +43.2% | +74.1% | +38.3% | +235% | 35.6% | 0.36 | −54.2% | — | $9.7B | — |
| ROK Industrial - MachineryRockwell Automation, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +0.7% | −6.4% | +4.1% | +8.4% | +22.9% | +68.9% | +45.6% | +335% | 32.3% | 0.40 | −45.1% | — | $48B | — |
| GEV Industrial - MachineryGE Vernova Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −5.9% | −17.5% | −10.0% | +31.3% | +50.1% | — | — | — | — | — | −38.3% | — | $237B | — |
| ENS Electrical Equipment & PartsEnerSys | 2/5 short0/3 long | −4.5% | −11.1% | −14.4% | +13.7% | +38.8% | +96.5% | +128% | +188% | 35.5% | 0.64 | −56.3% | — | $6.2B | — |
| CARR Industrial - MachineryCarrier Global Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.8% | −15.8% | −8.2% | +6.2% | −1.1% | +21.2% | +11.6% | — | 32.3% | 0.23 | −40.8% | — | $46B | — |
How did ETN do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where ETN ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ETN and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ETN finished in the top quarter in four of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 17 of 20.
- ETN finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, MSFT came out ahead of ETN most often, in 18 of the 29 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ETN; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ETN among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ETN | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETN This pageEaton Corporation plc | — | −2.8% | +39.5% | +56.2% | −7.2% | +46.7% | +31.0% | +42.8% | −10.0% | +21.5% | +33.8% | −20.7% | −8.2% | +44.2% | +28.6% | −11.8% | +64.0% | +33.3% | −47.1% | +31.6% | +14.4% | −5.4% | +36.5% | +41.1% | +7.6% | +40.8% | +6.0% | +5.3% | −19.0% | +30.7% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 29 | 17 of 20 | 8 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 9 of 18 | 6 of 18 | 8 of 17 | 8 of 17 | 9 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 8 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 9 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 1 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 9 of 13 | 6 of 13 | 9 of 13 | 9 of 13 | 3 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 4 of 12 | 3 of 12 | 7 of 12 | 8 of 12 | 7 of 11 | 5 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 14 of 27 | +33.7% | +46.6% | +51.7% | +24.6% | +59.5% | +77.8% | +35.8% | −22.9% | +12.2% | +72.1% | −28.7% | −10.1% | +15.7% | +26.7% | +8.1% | −4.4% | +5.3% | −24.6% | +33.5% | +49.3% | +64.7% | +9.5% | +109% | −77.3% | −52.1% | +71.0% | +28.0% | — | — |
| TT Trane Technologies plc | 15 of 29 | +6.4% | +53.0% | +47.4% | −15.3% | +41.0% | +43.4% | +48.3% | +4.4% | +21.3% | +38.5% | −11.1% | +4.6% | +29.9% | +59.3% | −34.7% | +32.6% | +110% | −62.0% | +20.2% | −1.7% | +1.7% | +19.6% | +59.7% | +4.3% | +1.2% | −23.0% | +17.7% | +17.9% | +38.1% |
| AZZ AZZ Inc. | 12 of 29 | +31.9% | +42.4% | +46.8% | −26.1% | +18.1% | +5.3% | +15.6% | −19.9% | −19.0% | +16.3% | +19.9% | −2.7% | +28.9% | +73.5% | +16.2% | +25.9% | +30.3% | −11.5% | +10.7% | +184% | +11.2% | +21.3% | +7.5% | −41.0% | +20.8% | +45.9% | +35.1% | −33.2% | +67.3% |
| NVT nVent Electric plc | 3 of 7 | +51.2% | +16.6% | +56.0% | +3.3% | +67.2% | −5.7% | +17.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 16 of 29 | +44.5% | +152% | +159% | +35.0% | +11.5% | −32.9% | +114% | −4.0% | −18.6% | +64.3% | −41.6% | −22.5% | +63.1% | +32.9% | −5.0% | +4.3% | +8.8% | −34.3% | +39.7% | +75.6% | −2.9% | −3.5% | +12.4% | −9.2% | +47.3% | +85.7% | −31.1% | −34.6% | +9.8% |
| VRT Vertiv Holdings Co | 4 of 7 | +42.8% | +137% | +252% | −45.3% | +33.8% | +69.4% | +12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 18 of 29 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% | +5.8% | −4.5% | −6.5% | +60.5% | −44.4% | +20.8% | +15.8% | −1.0% | +9.2% | +6.2% | −22.0% | +52.8% | −62.9% | +68.4% | +115% | +56.5% |
| HUBB Hubbell Incorporated | 9 of 29 | +7.4% | +28.9% | +42.4% | +15.1% | +35.6% | +8.9% | +52.9% | −24.6% | +18.8% | +18.4% | −3.3% | −0.2% | +31.1% | +29.3% | +14.1% | +30.9% | +50.5% | −34.4% | +17.0% | +3.2% | −11.3% | +22.1% | +30.2% | +24.5% | +16.3% | +2.7% | −25.7% | −20.7% | +16.8% |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | 8 of 15 | −12.0% | +20.0% | +28.4% | −71.4% | +54.8% | +126% | +102% | +0.4% | +21.6% | +36.9% | −36.3% | −17.4% | +118% | +162% | +73.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CEG Constellation Energy Corporation | 2 of 3 | +58.8% | +92.7% | +37.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 13 of 29 | +16.9% | +121% | +203% | −66.2% | −53.5% | +198% | −29.6% | +207% | −50.7% | +15.7% | −14.0% | −54.8% | −37.4% | −29.0% | −87.1% | −30.1% | +151% | −40.3% | +179% | +24.6% | −47.1% | +7.4% | +360% | −75.4% | −57.1% | +2.0% | +173% | +20.6% | −20.0% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 16 of 29 | +14.7% | +10.0% | +18.8% | −4.3% | +22.3% | +22.2% | +48.3% | −5.9% | +50.0% | −8.6% | +2.5% | +0.5% | +41.0% | +34.6% | +7.9% | +54.8% | +27.6% | −35.1% | +47.9% | +13.0% | +20.0% | +48.9% | +26.4% | +21.4% | +23.7% | +37.7% | −13.6% | −16.8% | +22.4% |
| ATKR Atkore Inc. | 4 of 9 | −22.7% | −47.3% | +41.1% | +2.0% | +170% | +1.6% | +104% | −7.5% | −10.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 9 of 29 | +8.9% | +29.7% | +3.8% | +5.7% | +18.2% | +8.6% | +31.6% | −11.9% | +29.1% | +21.0% | −19.7% | −9.6% | +36.1% | +17.3% | −16.3% | +37.8% | +20.7% | −33.6% | +31.5% | +20.7% | +9.2% | +11.0% | +31.4% | −8.3% | −25.7% | +40.8% | −3.0% | +9.2% | +19.1% |
| LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +8.6% | −11.0% | +22.7% | −29.4% | +24.4% | +34.5% | +12.7% | −12.6% | +31.4% | +43.3% | +11.9% | +5.1% | +52.3% | +45.6% | −7.4% | +46.9% | +93.7% | −49.6% | +3.4% | +17.0% | −20.3% | +18.5% | +71.0% | −35.8% | −8.4% | +18.0% | +26.1% | −22.6% | +2.6% |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +38.4% | −6.2% | +22.6% | −24.8% | +41.2% | +26.2% | +37.9% | −21.8% | +48.9% | +34.5% | −5.5% | −3.9% | +43.8% | +17.2% | +4.5% | +56.1% | +50.9% | −51.9% | +14.9% | +4.7% | +21.3% | +41.8% | +76.5% | +20.0% | −11.3% | +5.5% | +168% | −1.9% | +37.1% |
| GEV GE Vernova Inc. | 1 of 1 | +99.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ENS EnerSys | 10 of 21 | +60.3% | −7.6% | +37.9% | −5.6% | −4.0% | +12.2% | −2.6% | +12.5% | −10.0% | +41.1% | −8.3% | −11.1% | +87.5% | +44.9% | −19.1% | +46.9% | +98.8% | −55.9% | +56.0% | +22.7% | −14.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CARR Carrier Global Corporation | 0 of 5 | −21.8% | +20.3% | +41.5% | −22.7% | +45.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How ETN has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ETN's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ETN's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of ETN's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ETN fell 41.9% from October 1997 to August 1998, while the S&P 500 slipped only 0.2%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 22 months, after ETN fell 47.6% from August to October 1987.
Green means ETN fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ETN fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −68.9% | −54.3% | Jul 2007 | Mar 2009 | 20 months | Nov 2010 | 20 months |
| No named crash | −47.6% | — | Aug 1987 | Oct 1987 | 2 months | Aug 1989 | 22 months |
| Covid crash | −44.5% | −33.4% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Aug 2020 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −41.9% | −0.2% | Oct 1997 | Aug 1998 | 10 months | Jul 1999 | 11 months |
| Dot-com bust | −40.7% | −0.8% | Jul 1999 | Oct 2000 | 15 months | Feb 2001 | 4 months |
How did ETN do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ETN, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- ETN fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when ETN fell 34.6% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
- Among its popular alternatives, HUBB held up best, falling less than ETN in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ETN.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETN This pageEaton Corporation plc | — | −4.5% | −26.3% | −44.5% | −26.0% | −6.7% | −22.3% | −34.6% | −1.4% | −68.5% | −31.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −4.0% | −21.7% | −40.8% | −22.1% | −7.1% | −35.4% | −21.6% | −1.7% | −69.6% | −97.1% |
| TT Trane Technologies plc | 4 of 10 | −3.3% | −37.5% | −39.2% | −17.9% | −8.0% | −20.6% | −34.2% | −2.6% | −77.5% | −44.7% |
| AZZ AZZ Inc. | 3 of 10 | −8.3% | −44.8% | −52.7% | −27.3% | −7.0% | −20.4% | −28.3% | −2.1% | −65.3% | −56.8% |
| NVT nVent Electric plc | 1 of 4 | −8.0% | −20.9% | −56.2% | −30.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −8.4% | −35.9% | −56.9% | −35.0% | −10.5% | −34.6% | −30.1% | −2.6% | −68.7% | −48.7% |
| VRT Vertiv Holdings Co | 1 of 4 | −12.2% | −65.7% | −58.6% | −3.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 6 of 10 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| HUBB Hubbell Incorporated | 7 of 10 | −5.6% | −17.3% | −40.6% | −31.6% | −3.7% | −20.9% | −26.6% | −1.0% | −59.7% | −27.4% |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | 5 of 8 | −6.8% | −54.8% | −33.1% | −21.8% | −5.6% | −16.2% | −24.4% | −4.0% | — | — |
| CEG Constellation Energy Corporation | 1 of 1 | −2.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0 of 10 | −13.7% | −64.7% | −44.2% | −25.8% | −15.1% | −31.9% | −56.8% | −3.1% | −80.6% | −96.3% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −3.7% | −26.4% | −42.0% | −22.1% | −6.7% | −21.9% | −30.3% | −1.2% | −53.3% | −34.9% |
| ATKR Atkore Inc. | 0 of 5 | −9.2% | −42.3% | −71.9% | −34.0% | −7.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 6 of 10 | −4.3% | −25.4% | −47.2% | −28.8% | −5.9% | −15.9% | −25.8% | 0.0% | −56.1% | −43.6% |
| LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −3.7% | −38.8% | −43.8% | −25.5% | −9.5% | −17.2% | −31.3% | −3.0% | −77.4% | −71.5% |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −5.4% | −43.8% | −42.4% | −27.5% | −7.9% | −23.6% | −37.5% | −1.4% | −74.7% | −42.0% |
| ENS EnerSys | 1 of 9 | −8.3% | −30.0% | −48.8% | −19.0% | −7.1% | −34.2% | −49.4% | −4.1% | −84.0% | — |
| CARR Carrier Global Corporation | 0 of 2 | −5.6% | −35.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does ETN move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ETN with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, ETN captured 114% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 80% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.16. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only PWR, POWL and TT had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ETN's 1.43, out of 14 popular alternatives with the same record.
- PWR took just 61% of the S&P 500's losses, against 80% for ETN, while still keeping 141% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ETN's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETN This pageEaton Corporation plc | 114% | 80% | 1.43 | 1.16 |
| PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 141% | 61% | 2.31 | 1.22 |
| POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 162% | 91% | 1.79 | 1.20 |
| TT Trane Technologies plc | 115% | 69% | 1.66 | 1.10 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 111% | 101% | 1.10 | 1.15 |
| HUBB Hubbell Incorporated | 108% | 101% | 1.07 | 1.03 |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | 129% | 133% | 0.97 | 1.45 |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 122% | 138% | 0.88 | 1.46 |
| ATKR Atkore Inc. | 155% | 185% | 0.84 | 2.10 |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 124% | 153% | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| LFUS Littelfuse, Inc. | 124% | 154% | 0.81 | 1.34 |
| AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 157% | 205% | 0.77 | 2.23 |
| ENS EnerSys | 113% | 148% | 0.77 | 1.31 |
| AZZ AZZ Inc. | 94% | 127% | 0.75 | 1.30 |
What diversifies ETN?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ETN's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ETN with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ETN into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+25.5% for ETN alone, +25.0% for the mix).
- CAH made money in seven of the nine calendar years in which ETN lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of ETN over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ETN lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ETN and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2005 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc (this page) | 1.00 | +153% | 0.74 | −2.8% | −7.2% | −10.0% | −20.7% | −8.2% | −11.8% | −47.1% | −5.4% | −19.0% | 27.7% | +25.5% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.27 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.7% | +24.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.35 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | 23.2% | +26.4% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.46 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | 23.6% | +24.0% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.02 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +17.8% | — | 22.3% | +25.0% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.15 | +177% | 0.93 | +7.9% | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +40.1% | — | 23.5% | +26.1% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.33 | +99.4% | 0.93 | +45.4% | −3.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.4% | +24.1% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.46 | +109% | 0.90 | +32.7% | −14.2% | −11.1% | −4.1% | +12.8% | — | — | — | — | 24.3% | +24.5% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.44 | +153% | 0.89 | +28.4% | −28.9% | −9.9% | −12.9% | +7.0% | −21.8% | −45.3% | +4.7% | — | 24.8% | +25.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2005 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc (this page) | 1.00 | +153% | 0.74 | −2.8% | −7.2% | −10.0% | −20.7% | −8.2% | −11.8% | −47.1% | −5.4% | −19.0% | 27.7% | +25.5% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.19 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +8.1% | −39.6% | +18.7% | +51.7% | 23.7% | +29.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.17 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +64.9% | +46.9% | 23.5% | +28.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.19 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | 24.2% | +31.2% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.49 | +594% | 1.36 | +87.9% | +24.2% | −37.5% | −36.3% | +50.9% | −42.9% | −67.4% | −1.8% | +7.0% | 26.2% | +30.9% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.29 | +1,008% | 1.34 | +109% | +87.5% | −9.8% | −66.7% | −0.5% | −12.2% | −70.0% | +68.2% | — | 26.5% | +34.3% |
Common questions
What was ETN's worst drawdown?
ETN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 68.9%, from July 2007 to March 2009. It took 20 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were ETN's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, ETN's best year was 2010, when it returned 64.0%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -47.2%.
Is there a better investment than ETN?
Among ETN's popular alternatives, TT earned more than ETN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 22.7% a year at 27.7% volatility, against 20.4% a year at 32.1%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PH (industrial machinery) and WAB (industrial machinery) earned more than ETN with less volatility over the past 5 years. PH returned 27.4% a year at 28.8% volatility, against 20.4% a year at 32.1%.
Is ETN more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ETN's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.1%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ETN's return lands within 32.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ETN's Sharpe ratio?
ETN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.74, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ETN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ETN with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ETN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.64 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ETN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ETN holding.
What are the best alternatives to ETN?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, four outperformed ETN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: PWR, TT and AZZ.
Did ETN outperform the S&P 500?
ETN finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -2.8%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ETN do in stock market crashes?
ETN fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when ETN fell 34.6% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
What diversifies ETN?
These had a low correlation with ETN over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.27), DXJ (correlation 0.35) and EMLP (correlation 0.46); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.19), MCK (correlation 0.17) and MPC (correlation 0.19). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ETN's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ETN's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to ETN
PWRQuanta Services
TTTrane Technologies
VRTVertiv
MSFTMicrosoft
CEGConstellation Energy
AMEAMETEK
EMREmerson Electric
ROKRockwell Automation
GEVGE Vernova
CARRCarrier Global