Relative Intelligence · Industrial Machinery

How Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on WAB alone. It places WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation) against 9 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where WAB stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: WAB's full trading record, from June 1995 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowWAB has outpaced the market, rising 10.1% over the past 3 months against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?WAB held up far better than its industry: it rose 10.1% over the past 3 months while the industrial machinery ETF XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF) fell 6.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, WAB rose 45.3% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (189% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termWAB turned $10,000 into $36,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: WAB rose 212% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashWAB fell harder than the S&P 500 in five of seven sell-offs. The 2022 bear market was the exception: WAB fell 18.9%, less than the S&P 500's 24.5%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, WAB has a correlation of 0.62 over 5 years, more closely than 93% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Over 10 years, WAB's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.28: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.1 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.3 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- ESLT (Elbit Systems, aerospace & defense) earned more for the risk it took than WAB over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 35.4%, against 64.1% for WAB.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WAB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them CAH (Cardinal Health) and EPU (iShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF).
How much would $10,000 in WAB have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in WAB over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of WAB over the same span and WAB's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in WAB at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $275,358 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of WAB, and ESLT finished highest, at $1,652,837.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 225 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of WAB; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ESLT$2M+16,428% total · +19.3% a year
- CNI$468,127+4,581% total · +14.2% a year
- CP$436,454+4,265% total · +13.9% a year
- MOG-A$350,288+3,403% total · +13.0% a year
- UNP$306,095+2,961% total · +12.5% a year
- WAB$275,358+2,654% total · +12.1% a year
- CSX$247,386+2,374% total · +11.7% a year
- NSC$171,092+1,611% total · +10.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- GATX$115,106+1,051% total · +8.8% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 273 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of WAB; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MOG-A$52,115+421% total · +39.1% a year
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- ESLT$49,131+391% total · +37.5% a year
- MCK$43,941+339% total · +34.5% a year
- CW$43,818+338% total · +34.4% a year
- WAB$34,242+242% total · +27.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- CSX$16,737+67.4% total · +10.8% a year
- UNP$15,540+55.4% total · +9.2% a year
- NSC$14,343+43.4% total · +7.5% a year
WAB at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- WAB's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 71.8%, from April 1998 to October 2000. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, WAB's best was 1997, when it returned 104%, and its worst was 2000, when it lost 33.5%. It lost money in seven of those years.
- WAB is 7.1% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $48B
- Industry
- Railroads
- Price history from
- June 1995
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +45.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +189%+42.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- +212%+25.6% a year
- Past 10 years
- +264%+13.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +104%1997
- Worst calendar year
- −33.5%2000
- Losing years
- 7 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 26.2%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.00return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −71.8%Apr 1998 to Oct 2000
- From its all-time high
- −7.1%below the peak
WAB against the whole market
Where WAB ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does WAB rank among all stocks?
This section ranks WAB on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how WAB stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), WAB ranks in the top 3% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | WAB | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +45.3% | 629 of 3,287 | top 19% |
| 3-year return | +189% | 440 of 3,017 | top 15% |
| 5-year return | +212% | 289 of 2,893 | top 10% |
| 10-year return | +264% | 675 of 2,202 | top 31% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 26.2% | 424 of 2,893 | top 15% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.00 | 97 of 2,893 | top 3% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −64.1% | 1,048 of 2,187 | top 48% |
What has beaten WAB on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). WAB sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than WAB with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- One stock and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than WAB over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half WAB's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 6% less than WAB's 26.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 1.00 for WAB.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to WAB. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than WAB?
Investments that beat WAB over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ESLT (aerospace & defense) earned more for the risk it took than WAB over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 35.4%, against 64.1% for WAB.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WAB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them CAH and EPU.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat WAB over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks WAB's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than WAB follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than WAB's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× WAB's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than WAB's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with WAB?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.62 | 0.09% | |||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Industrial Machinery and the categories next to it (Infrastructure, Electrical Equipment, Aerospace & Defense, Industrial Distribution), plus WAB's specific themes. 7 of 101 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return in most periods | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.45 | — | |
ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.16 | — | |
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.59 | — | ||
CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, similar volatility | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.60 | — | |
HUBBHubbell Incorporated · Electrical Equipment | Smaller losses in recent crashes | +21.0% | 30.0% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +442% | 0.45 | — | |
LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Smaller losses in recent crashes | +14.1% | 27.5% | 0.62 | −38.9% | +389% | 0.52 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 74 of 3,523 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.33 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.00 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.31 | — | |
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.44 | 0.48% | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.32 | — | ||
EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.53 | 0.59% | |
| On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.31 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for WAB
- Annual return
- WAB returned 25.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $31,200. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- WAB's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.2%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, WAB's return lands within 26.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- WAB's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.00, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so WAB earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- WAB's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 64.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 64.1% fall takes a 178% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, WAB's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.62 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against WAB instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a WAB holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than WAB with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with WAB | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.33 | — | |
| 2 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.53 | 0.59% |
WAB against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against WAB, compared period by period and year by year.
How do WAB's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at WAB, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the nine popular alternatives earned more than WAB over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, WAB returned 25.6% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (26.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than WAB with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| WAB This pageWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | +25.6% | 26.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| GATX GATX Corporation | +12.4% | 25.1% |
| CSX CSX Corporation | +8.3% | 23.3% |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | +7.1% | 22.9% |
| WABC Westamerica Bancorporation | +5.4% | 25.3% |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Corporation | +5.3% | 24.8% |
| CP Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. | +4.0% | 24.1% |
| CNI Canadian National Railway Company | +0.6% | 21.9% |
| TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | +0.5% | 35.7% |
| GBX The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | −2.0% | 42.2% |
Has WAB consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares WAB with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than WAB helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the nine popular alternatives outperformed WAB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was CSX.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than WAB over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (this page) | — | +0.1% | +10.1% | +7.6% | +31.6% | +45.3% | +189% | +212% | +264% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | — | $48B | — |
| CSX RailroadsCSX Corporation | 3/5 short1/3 long | +4.5% | −3.8% | +10.6% | +33.7% | +32.8% | +63.0% | +49.3% | +446% | 23.3% | 0.46 | −40.5% | — | $89B | — |
| UNP RailroadsUnion Pacific Corporation | 2/5 short1/3 long | +6.7% | −2.5% | +15.2% | +25.9% | +29.2% | +45.4% | +41.2% | +295% | 22.9% | 0.42 | −38.7% | — | $171B | — |
| NSC RailroadsNorfolk Southern Corporation | 1/5 short1/3 long | +5.3% | −2.4% | +7.9% | +14.6% | +13.8% | +72.0% | +29.5% | +328% | 24.8% | 0.33 | −44.4% | — | $73B | — |
| GATX Rental & Leasing ServicesGATX Corporation | 0/5 short1/3 long | −10.4% | −8.9% | −18.9% | −4.3% | −5.1% | +59.5% | +79.2% | +329% | 25.1% | 0.59 | −38.3% | — | $5.7B | — |
| CNI RailroadsCanadian National Railway Company | 2/5 short0/3 long | +3.2% | −3.8% | +10.2% | +23.0% | +30.2% | +21.9% | +3.1% | +124% | 21.9% | 0.14 | −29.1% | — | $73B | — |
| WABC Banks - RegionalWestamerica Bancorporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +2.6% | +0.1% | +17.2% | +30.9% | +35.1% | +48.8% | +30.3% | +70.1% | 25.3% | 0.34 | −40.8% | — | $1.4B | — |
| CP RailroadsCanadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +0.8% | −4.5% | +7.4% | +18.1% | +15.1% | +25.6% | +21.6% | +227% | 24.1% | 0.28 | −33.7% | — | $77B | — |
| TRN RailroadsTrinity Industries, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −9.9% | −31.1% | −20.6% | −4.1% | −8.8% | +29.7% | +2.5% | +107% | 35.7% | 0.19 | −45.2% | — | $2.0B | — |
| GBX RailroadsThe Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −10.4% | −24.1% | −23.3% | −18.8% | −15.7% | −0.7% | −9.4% | +38.6% | 42.2% | 0.16 | −78.7% | — | $1.2B | — |
How did WAB do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where WAB ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with WAB and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, WAB finished in the top quarter in ten of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 10.
- WAB finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 16 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, CSX came out ahead of WAB most often, in 16 of the 29 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of WAB; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places WAB among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of WAB | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAB This pageWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | — | +13.2% | +50.1% | +28.0% | +9.1% | +26.5% | −5.2% | +11.5% | −13.3% | −1.4% | +17.3% | −17.9% | +17.3% | +70.1% | +25.4% | +32.4% | +29.7% | +2.8% | +15.6% | +13.5% | +13.1% | +26.5% | +25.4% | +21.8% | +14.6% | +4.9% | −33.5% | −27.2% | −4.5% | +104% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 10 of 29 | 3 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 5 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 10 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 5 of 10 | 1 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 13 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| CSX CSX Corporation | 16 of 29 | +14.2% | −5.6% | +13.5% | −16.6% | +25.7% | +27.1% | +18.0% | +14.5% | +55.5% | +42.1% | −26.7% | +28.4% | +49.3% | −3.9% | −0.2% | +35.7% | +53.2% | −24.9% | +29.6% | +37.0% | +27.9% | +12.4% | +30.5% | −18.6% | +38.2% | −12.8% | −22.5% | −21.1% | +30.6% |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 13 of 29 | +3.9% | −5.1% | +21.6% | −15.9% | +23.3% | +17.6% | +33.7% | +5.3% | +32.3% | +36.0% | −32.9% | +44.5% | +36.3% | +21.2% | +16.7% | +47.6% | +36.6% | −22.7% | +38.3% | +15.8% | +21.8% | −1.3% | +17.9% | +6.5% | +14.0% | +18.7% | −1.5% | −26.8% | +7.0% |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Corporation | 13 of 29 | +25.7% | +1.6% | −1.6% | −15.6% | +27.3% | +24.8% | +32.4% | +5.2% | +36.8% | +31.5% | −20.3% | +20.8% | +54.2% | −12.7% | +18.8% | +22.8% | +15.2% | −4.8% | +2.2% | +13.8% | +25.6% | +55.3% | +20.2% | +10.4% | +39.5% | −31.8% | −33.5% | +6.6% | +6.6% |
| GATX GATX Corporation | 11 of 29 | +11.1% | +31.1% | +15.2% | +4.2% | +27.9% | +3.2% | +19.7% | +16.6% | +3.8% | +49.8% | −23.8% | +12.7% | +23.6% | +2.0% | +27.7% | +27.4% | −3.0% | −13.1% | −13.4% | +22.7% | +24.9% | +8.9% | +31.0% | −26.5% | −32.6% | +52.6% | −8.1% | +7.3% | +54.3% |
| CNI Canadian National Railway Company | 14 of 29 | −0.1% | −17.5% | +7.8% | −1.4% | +13.7% | +23.6% | +24.3% | −8.6% | +24.4% | +22.8% | −17.6% | +22.6% | +27.3% | +17.9% | +20.3% | +24.4% | +51.4% | −20.1% | +10.9% | +9.2% | +32.6% | +47.4% | +55.3% | −12.3% | +65.5% | +14.8% | +4.3% | +11.6% | +26.8% |
| WABC Westamerica Bancorporation | 10 of 29 | −5.4% | −3.6% | −0.8% | +5.2% | +7.4% | −16.1% | +24.9% | −4.0% | −2.7% | +39.2% | −1.4% | −10.5% | +36.9% | +0.2% | −18.4% | +2.9% | +11.3% | +17.9% | −9.4% | −2.1% | −6.9% | +19.6% | +26.7% | +3.8% | −5.9% | +58.1% | −22.5% | +9.7% | +79.7% |
| CP Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. | 13 of 29 | +2.6% | −7.8% | +6.8% | +4.5% | +4.7% | +37.4% | +45.1% | −1.8% | +29.4% | +13.0% | −33.3% | +28.3% | +50.5% | +52.7% | +6.5% | +22.2% | +64.1% | −47.1% | +24.2% | +27.5% | +23.9% | +24.6% | +45.2% | +3.5% | +40.6% | +35.6% | +17.3% | −29.0% | +4.1% |
| TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 12 of 29 | −21.5% | +37.2% | −6.2% | +1.5% | +17.9% | +23.8% | +11.1% | −22.4% | +37.1% | +18.0% | −12.9% | +3.7% | +54.1% | +20.9% | +14.2% | +55.1% | +13.3% | −42.6% | −20.6% | +20.6% | +30.2% | +11.5% | +64.6% | −29.0% | +12.2% | −9.0% | −24.7% | −12.2% | +21.4% |
| GBX The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 12 of 29 | −21.3% | +41.3% | +36.3% | −24.8% | +29.4% | +17.7% | −15.5% | −24.3% | +30.8% | +31.9% | −38.4% | +64.4% | +103% | −33.4% | +15.6% | +102% | +51.8% | −68.3% | −24.9% | +6.7% | −15.3% | +103% | +135% | −1.6% | −8.8% | −0.2% | −36.6% | −17.1% | +69.8% |
Risk and diversification
How WAB has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were WAB's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents WAB's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1995, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of WAB's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: WAB fell 71.8% from April 1998 to October 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 24.6%.
- The slowest recovery came after WAB fell 71.8% from April 1998 to October 2000; it did not regain that peak until January 2006, five years later.
Green means WAB fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | WAB fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −71.8% | +24.6% | Apr 1998 | Oct 2000 | 2.5 years | Jan 2006 | 5.3 years |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −64.1% | −17.6% | Sep 2018 | Mar 2020 | 18 months | Jul 2023 | 3.3 years |
| 2008 financial crisis | −60.8% | −46.9% | Aug 2008 | Mar 2009 | 7 months | Mar 2011 | 2 years |
| No named crash | −54.3% | +11.1% | Jul 1995 | Dec 1995 | 5 months | Jun 1997 | 18 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −40.7% | −11.1% | Jul 2015 | Feb 2016 | 7 months | Jun 2018 | 2.3 years |
How did WAB do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far WAB, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- WAB fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when WAB fell 40.5% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, UNP held up best, falling less than WAB in eight of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than WAB.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAB This pageWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | — | −6.4% | −18.9% | −48.3% | −37.9% | −2.9% | −40.5% | −26.1% | −2.4% | −60.8% | −33.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CSX CSX Corporation | 5 of 10 | −4.0% | −29.4% | −40.5% | −21.4% | −8.7% | −26.5% | −27.4% | −0.9% | −69.2% | −37.5% |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 8 of 10 | −4.2% | −29.8% | −37.5% | −21.9% | −4.8% | −28.7% | −23.4% | −1.5% | −59.5% | −25.6% |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Corporation | 5 of 10 | −4.0% | −28.4% | −43.6% | −23.8% | −5.6% | −31.7% | −21.1% | −2.1% | −62.9% | −39.9% |
| GATX GATX Corporation | 5 of 10 | −5.8% | −31.9% | −31.7% | −22.7% | −5.1% | −29.1% | −24.0% | −2.3% | −72.1% | −64.7% |
| CNI Canadian National Railway Company | 8 of 10 | −1.3% | −21.0% | −27.3% | −22.1% | −5.1% | −23.9% | −19.3% | −0.5% | −46.7% | −30.6% |
| WABC Westamerica Bancorporation | 8 of 10 | −8.6% | −15.6% | −28.0% | −16.5% | −4.7% | −18.0% | −24.1% | −1.2% | −46.9% | −24.4% |
| CP Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. | 5 of 10 | −3.0% | −19.9% | −32.9% | −24.4% | −4.3% | −35.1% | −29.8% | −0.4% | −65.4% | −35.7% |
| TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −11.7% | −38.5% | −34.4% | −30.8% | −5.4% | −32.8% | −43.3% | −4.6% | −83.9% | −45.9% |
| GBX The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −12.0% | −53.9% | −50.1% | −41.2% | −5.9% | −53.6% | −51.5% | −8.0% | −93.5% | −56.9% |
How closely does WAB move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares WAB with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Only GATX and CSX had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than WAB's 0.87, out of nine popular alternatives with the same record.
- GATX took just 107% of the S&P 500's losses, against 127% for WAB, while still keeping 109% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, WAB captured 111% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 127% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.28. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than WAB's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAB This pageWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 111% | 127% | 0.87 | 1.28 |
| GATX GATX Corporation | 109% | 107% | 1.01 | 1.08 |
| CSX CSX Corporation | 118% | 117% | 1.00 | 1.19 |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 104% | 119% | 0.87 | 1.05 |
| CP Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. | 96% | 113% | 0.85 | 1.00 |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Corporation | 123% | 147% | 0.84 | 1.30 |
| CNI Canadian National Railway Company | 80% | 105% | 0.77 | 0.89 |
| WABC Westamerica Bancorporation | 47% | 64% | 0.74 | 0.63 |
| TRN Trinity Industries, Inc. | 110% | 165% | 0.67 | 1.38 |
| GBX The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 124% | 211% | 0.59 | 1.50 |
What diversifies WAB?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with WAB's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing WAB with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in WAB into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 15% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+27.9% for WAB alone, +28.1% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EWP and SMH have moved largely independently of WAB over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in four of the seven calendar years in which WAB lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which WAB lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% WAB and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 2018 | 2017 | 2015 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +212% | 1.00 | −5.2% | −13.3% | −1.4% | −17.9% | −33.5% | −27.2% | −4.5% | 23.0% | +27.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.44 | +225% | 1.34 | +3.9% | −19.8% | +22.8% | +7.7% | — | — | — | 19.7% | +28.1% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.49 | +140% | 0.97 | −4.0% | −15.3% | +27.0% | −15.6% | −11.8% | −1.5% | +50.5% | 20.5% | +26.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.40 | +323% | 0.97 | +55.5% | −9.1% | +38.5% | −0.3% | — | — | — | 22.1% | +30.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.22 | +126% | 0.96 | +24.8% | −1.9% | +12.8% | −10.7% | — | — | — | 19.4% | +26.6% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.48 | +136% | 0.93 | +28.2% | −0.9% | +27.8% | — | — | — | — | 20.7% | +27.1% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.42 | +177% | 0.93 | −32.7% | −18.2% | −0.9% | −21.5% | +24.4% | +18.1% | — | 21.1% | +27.6% |
| MLPA EnergyGlobal X - MLP ETF | 0.49 | +103% | 0.91 | −34.0% | −15.7% | −8.3% | −30.0% | — | — | — | 20.3% | +26.1% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.36 | +153% | 0.89 | +31.5% | −9.9% | +26.9% | −12.9% | — | — | — | 20.8% | +27.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 2018 | 2017 | 2015 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +212% | 1.00 | −5.2% | −13.3% | −1.4% | −17.9% | −33.5% | −27.2% | −4.5% | 23.0% | +27.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.33 | +479% | 1.55 | +10.1% | −24.5% | −12.7% | +12.6% | +108% | −36.8% | +51.7% | 20.7% | +30.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.38 | +3,143% | 1.47 | −2.4% | −16.3% | −11.6% | −6.0% | −2.3% | +350% | — | 25.3% | +44.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.29 | +413% | 1.44 | +27.1% | −28.4% | +12.0% | −4.5% | +61.2% | −71.3% | +46.9% | 20.4% | +30.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.32 | +690% | 1.41 | −27.4% | −8.2% | +34.8% | +17.4% | — | — | — | 21.4% | +32.9% |
| PBR Oil & Gas IntegratedPetróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 0.35 | +667% | 1.28 | −29.0% | +27.7% | +1.8% | −41.1% | — | — | — | 22.1% | +32.5% |
Common questions
What was WAB's worst drawdown?
WAB's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 71.8%, from April 1998 to October 2000. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were WAB's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, WAB's best year was 1997, when it returned 104%. Its worst was 2000, with a return of -33.5%.
Is there a better investment than WAB?
Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ESLT (aerospace & defense) earned more for the risk it took than WAB over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 35.4%, against 64.1% for WAB. Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WAB with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them CAH and EPU.
Is WAB more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. WAB's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.2%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, WAB's return lands within 26.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is WAB's Sharpe ratio?
WAB's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.00, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so WAB earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is WAB with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, WAB's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.62 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against WAB instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a WAB holding.
What are the best alternatives to WAB?
None of the nine popular alternatives we compared outperformed WAB in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about WAB's strength than about its alternatives.
Did WAB outperform the S&P 500?
WAB finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 16 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +13.2%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did WAB do in stock market crashes?
WAB fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when WAB fell 40.5% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies WAB?
These had a low correlation with WAB over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.44), EWP (correlation 0.49) and SMH (correlation 0.40); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.33), CLS (correlation 0.38) and MCK (correlation 0.29). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than WAB's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of WAB's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.