Relative Intelligence · Semiconductors

How VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on SMH alone. It places SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) against 11 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where SMH stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: SMH's full trading record, from May 2000 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- What you're buyingSMH charges 0.35% a year; SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) tracks the same thing for 0.19%. 100% of SMH sits in technology, against 38% for the S&P 500. Better options ↓
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, SMH rose 17.8%, ahead of 96% of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. Its similar funds were far apart over the past 6 months, from SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF, up 19.9%) to PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF, up 3.7%). Market rank ↓
- Fund or market?SMH fell 2.2% over the past 3 months even as the S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- Long termSMH turned $10,000 into $176,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. SMH's 10-year return of 1,665% puts it among the best of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, SMH has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, SMH fell 44.1%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500, and more than similar funds such as XSD (State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF, 40.6%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 10 years, SMH's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.46: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.6 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.1 times as much. Against the S&P 500, SMH has a correlation of 0.78 over 5 years, more closely than 58% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- DELL (Dell Technologies, computer hardware) and STX (Seagate Technology, computer hardware) were ahead of SMH in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (54.4% and 48.7% volatility against 36.9%).
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 13 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SMH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY (Eli Lilly and Company), GE (GE Aerospace) and BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria).
How much would $10,000 in SMH have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in SMH over the past 25 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of SMH over the same span and SMH's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: The chart covers the past 25 years rather than SMH's full 26 years, because most of its popular alternatives have not traded that long.
- $10,000 invested in SMH at the end of September 2001 would have grown to $660,531 by September 2026, more than the $114,557 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of SMH, and AAPL finished highest, at $14,356,990.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2001 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 83 of the 1,326 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SMH; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$14M+143,470% total · +33.7% a year
- NVDA$11M+109,423% total · +32.3% a year
- AMZN$8M+83,363% total · +30.9% a year
- TSM$1M+13,478% total · +21.7% a year
- ESLT$1M+13,097% total · +21.6% a year
- SMH$660,531+6,505% total · +18.2% a year
- SOXX$435,742+4,257% total · +16.3% a year
- XLK$273,782+2,638% total · +14.2% a year
- IGV$184,528+1,745% total · +12.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$114,557+1,046% total · +10.2% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 131 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SMH; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- STX$128,799+1,188% total · +66.7% a year
- ATI$113,890+1,039% total · +62.7% a year
- DELL$112,363+1,024% total · +62.2% a year
- ASX$70,798+608% total · +47.9% a year
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- SMH$48,982+390% total · +37.4% a year
- SOXX$39,747+297% total · +31.8% a year
- XLK$27,207+172% total · +22.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- IGV$13,343+33.4% total · +5.9% a year
SMH at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the fund, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- SMH's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 83.8%, from June 2000 to November 2008. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 25 full calendar years, SMH's best was 2003, when it returned 87.3%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 47.0%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- SMH is 18.3% below its all-time high.
The fund
- Issuer
- VanEck
- Began trading
- May 2000
- Expense ratio
- 0.35%per year
- Assets
- $66B
- Category
- Technology
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +57.8%total return
- Past 3 years
- +290%+57.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- +323%+33.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +1,665%+33.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +87.3%2003
- Worst calendar year
- −47.0%2002
- Losing years
- 8 of 25full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 36.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.97return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −83.8%Jun 2000 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −18.3%below the peak
SMH against the whole market
Where SMH ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does SMH rank among all ETFs?
This section ranks SMH on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every ETF worth at least $100 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how SMH stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- SMH's 5-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 1,560 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with 5 years of history.
- SMH is among the more volatile ETFs: its price swings rank in the bottom 4% of the 1,560 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed ETFs with at least $100M in assets that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller ETFs and leveraged funds are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | SMH | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +57.8% | 41 of 2,485 | top 2% |
| 3-year return | +290% | 2 of 1,949 | top 1% |
| 5-year return | +323% | 1 of 1,560 | top 1% |
| 10-year return | +1,665% | 2 of 958 | top 1% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 36.9% | 1,503 of 1,560 | bottom 5% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.97 | 145 of 1,560 | top 9% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −45.3% | 714 of 951 | bottom 26% |
What has beaten SMH on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). SMH sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than SMH with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 13 stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than SMH over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half SMH's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 33% less than SMH's 36.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.97 for SMH. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than SMH (33.4% against 36.9%).
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to SMH; faint dots are 8 more of the 13 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than SMH?
Investments that beat SMH over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, DELL (computer hardware) and STX (computer hardware) were ahead of SMH in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (54.4% and 48.7% volatility against 36.9%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 13 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SMH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, GE and BBVA.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat SMH over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes, and, for funds, the same exposure at a lower expense ratio. It checks SMH's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than SMH follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than SMH's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× SMH's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than SMH's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with SMH?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 1.00 | 0.35% | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.78 | 0.09% | |||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 3 shownEverything else in Semiconductors and the categories next to it (Semiconductor Equipment, Computer Hardware, Communications Equipment, Software), plus SMH's specific themes. 3 of 144 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +2,698% | 0.76 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.82 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 34 of 3,480 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.08 | — | ||
ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | -0.07 | — | |
ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.23 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatility | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.06 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.26 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for SMH
- Annual return
- SMH returned 33.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $42,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- SMH's volatility over the past 5 years was 36.9%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SMH's return lands within 36.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- SMH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.97, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SMH earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- SMH's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 45.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 45.3% fall takes a 82.8% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, SMH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.78 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SMH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SMH holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 13 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than SMH with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with SMH | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.16 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.08 | — | |
| 3 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | -0.07 | — |
| 4 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.07 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.34 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.12 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.50 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.16 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.13 | — | |
| 10 | MLIMueller Industries, Inc. · Metal Fabrication | Whole market | +38.9% | 33.4% | 1.16 | −53.0% | +800% | 0.42 | — |
| 11 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.41 | — |
| 12 | LAURLaureate Education, Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +37.5% | 32.8% | 1.14 | −64.5% | — | 0.00 | — |
| 13 | NRPNatural Resource Partners L.P. · Coal | Whole market | +37.4% | 33.9% | 1.11 | −78.8% | +632% | -0.08 | — |
See everything that outperformed SMH →
SMH against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against SMH, compared period by period and year by year.
How do SMH's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at SMH, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the ten popular alternatives earned more than SMH over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Five of the ten popular alternatives earned less than SMH over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, SMH returned 33.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (36.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than SMH with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SMH This pageVanEck Semiconductor ETF | +33.4% | 36.9% |
| SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | +28.3% | 38.9% |
| SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | +27.5% | 38.9% |
| FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | +27.4% | 38.8% |
| PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | +24.3% | 41.6% |
| XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | +19.4% | 26.0% |
| XSD State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | +18.3% | 40.8% |
| AIQ Global X - Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | +14.8% | 26.7% |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | +14.5% | 23.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | +4.4% | 28.9% |
| SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | −4.4% | 20.2% |
Has SMH consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares SMH with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than SMH helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 11 popular alternatives outperformed SMH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was SOXX.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than SMH over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF (this page) | — | −8.3% | −2.2% | +17.8% | +46.4% | +57.8% | +290% | +323% | +1,665% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | 0.35% | $66B | — |
| SOXX Broad MarketiShares Semiconductor ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −10.6% | −4.5% | +19.9% | +59.7% | +71.2% | +234% | +237% | +1,392% | 38.9% | 0.82 | −45.8% | 0.33% | $39B | — |
| XLK TechnologyState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −4.8% | +5.7% | +20.3% | +29.0% | +29.3% | +131% | +143% | +767% | 26.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | 0.08% | $125B | 100% |
| IGV Broad MarketiShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 3/5 short0/3 long | −0.2% | +15.0% | +23.9% | +4.2% | −6.1% | +57.9% | +24.0% | +383% | 28.9% | 0.29 | −45.9% | 0.38% | $15B | — |
| PSI TechnologyInvesco Semiconductors ETF | 2/5 short0/3 long | −12.9% | −12.1% | +3.7% | +52.3% | +68.1% | +217% | +196% | +1,134% | 41.6% | 0.73 | −44.9% | 0.55% | $2.8B | 100% |
| FTXL TechnologyFirst Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 2/5 short0/3 long | −9.6% | −1.9% | +18.2% | +64.8% | +85.1% | +249% | +235% | +1,077% | 38.8% | 0.82 | −43.9% | 0.60% | $1.2B | 100% |
| QQQ Broad MarketInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 2/5 short0/3 long | −3.2% | +3.2% | +11.2% | +17.4% | +17.9% | +106% | +97.2% | +553% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | 0.18% | $492B | 59% |
| AIQ TechnologyGlobal X - Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 2/5 short0/3 long | −4.7% | +6.8% | +17.2% | +22.8% | +23.3% | +141% | +99.6% | — | 26.7% | 0.65 | −44.6% | 0.68% | $10B | 71% |
| SOXQ TechnologyInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 2/5 short0/3 long | −9.3% | −3.9% | +17.7% | +53.5% | +64.5% | +246% | +248% | — | 38.9% | 0.84 | −46.0% | 0.19% | $2.9B | 100% |
| SRVR Real EstatePacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 1/5 short0/3 long | −7.1% | −5.7% | −18.7% | −0.6% | −7.7% | +24.4% | −20.3% | — | 20.2% | -0.13 | −41.0% | 0.49% | $292M | 6% |
| XSD TechnologyState Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −10.0% | −5.8% | +11.5% | +40.9% | +35.0% | +166% | +132% | +857% | 40.8% | 0.62 | −42.3% | 0.35% | $2.7B | 97% |
| SHOC TechnologyStrive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −9.5% | −3.7% | +12.3% | +40.7% | +50.8% | +222% | — | — | — | — | −37.5% | 0.40% | $218M | 100% |
How did SMH do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2001, along with where SMH ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with SMH and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- SMH finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 16 of its 25 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- None of the nine popular alternatives came out ahead of SMH in most of the years they have in common.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, SMH finished in the top quarter in eight of 24 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 2 of 12.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of SMH; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places SMH among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of SMH | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH This pageVanEck Semiconductor ETF | — | +49.2% | +39.1% | +73.4% | −33.5% | +42.1% | +55.5% | +64.5% | −9.1% | +38.5% | +35.6% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +33.4% | +8.6% | +6.8% | +19.0% | +60.5% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −6.7% | +10.8% | −19.3% | +87.3% | −47.0% | −14.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 8 of 24 | 2 of 12 | 1 of 12 | 1 of 12 | 5 of 11 | 4 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 6 of 8 | 4 of 8 | 3 of 7 | 5 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 4 of 7 | 4 of 7 | 1 of 7 | 4 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 4 of 7 | 4 of 7 | 6 of 6 | 2 of 5 | 5 of 5 | 1 of 5 | 4 of 5 | — |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 25 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% |
| SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 9 of 24 | +40.7% | +12.9% | +67.1% | −35.1% | +44.1% | +52.7% | +62.4% | −6.5% | +39.8% | +38.3% | −2.0% | +29.8% | +41.6% | +6.6% | −10.6% | +14.3% | +74.8% | −51.7% | −2.2% | +0.2% | +13.4% | −14.3% | +81.0% | −47.9% | — |
| XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 9 of 25 | +24.6% | +21.6% | +56.0% | −27.7% | +34.8% | +43.6% | +49.9% | −1.7% | +34.3% | +15.0% | +5.5% | +17.9% | +26.2% | +15.4% | +2.5% | +11.5% | +51.1% | −41.5% | +15.5% | +12.2% | −0.4% | +5.6% | +38.7% | −38.2% | −23.4% |
| IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 10 of 24 | +5.6% | +23.4% | +58.6% | −35.7% | +12.3% | +52.9% | +34.3% | +12.5% | +42.1% | +5.8% | +12.2% | +13.4% | +30.6% | +16.9% | −7.3% | +24.6% | +47.6% | −38.5% | +15.7% | +10.8% | −5.5% | +13.8% | +50.3% | −44.8% | — |
| PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 6 of 20 | +36.3% | +17.2% | +49.0% | −34.4% | +46.5% | +56.8% | +52.5% | −11.5% | +40.2% | +44.1% | −0.9% | +37.5% | +31.9% | +4.4% | −14.5% | +20.9% | +47.0% | −46.3% | +0.4% | +4.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0 of 9 | +48.9% | +7.6% | +54.4% | −33.9% | +36.0% | +46.0% | +61.8% | −14.5% | +32.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 10 of 25 | +20.8% | +25.6% | +54.9% | −32.6% | +27.4% | +48.6% | +39.0% | −0.1% | +32.7% | +7.1% | +9.4% | +19.2% | +36.6% | +18.1% | +3.4% | +19.9% | +54.7% | −41.7% | +19.0% | +7.2% | +1.6% | +10.5% | +49.7% | −37.4% | −33.4% |
| AIQ Global X - Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0 of 7 | +31.9% | +24.1% | +55.4% | −36.5% | +17.1% | +52.9% | +39.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0 of 4 | +43.1% | +20.2% | +66.8% | −35.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 1 of 7 | −2.0% | +2.6% | +6.9% | −31.9% | +22.3% | +11.9% | +42.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XSD State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 6 of 19 | +29.8% | +10.8% | +34.9% | −30.9% | +42.5% | +62.0% | +64.7% | −6.3% | +25.2% | +29.4% | +10.2% | +31.1% | +36.4% | +2.4% | −18.1% | +15.7% | +99.0% | −47.7% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0 of 3 | +49.9% | +16.7% | +62.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How SMH has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were SMH's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents SMH's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2000, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of SMH's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after SMH fell 83.8% from June 2000 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until November 2016, eight years later.
Green means SMH fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | SMH fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −83.8% | −41.4% | Jun 2000 | Nov 2008 | 8.4 years | Nov 2016 | 8 years |
| 2022 bear market | −45.3% | −24.2% | Dec 2021 | Oct 2022 | 10 months | Jul 2023 | 9 months |
| No named crash | −35.7% | −10.7% | Jul 2024 | Apr 2025 | 9 months | Jul 2025 | 3 months |
| Covid crash | −33.6% | −32.0% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jun 2020 | 3 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −27.0% | −14.3% | Mar 2018 | Dec 2018 | 9 months | Apr 2019 | 4 months |
How did SMH do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far SMH, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: SMH began trading on May 5, 2000, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- SMH fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when SMH fell 44.1% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, SRVR held up best, falling less than SMH in all four crashes they both traded through.
- SMH began trading after the dot-com bust, but two of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was XLK's 82.0%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than SMH.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH This pageVanEck Semiconductor ETF | — | −3.6% | −44.1% | −33.6% | −23.5% | −7.4% | −17.9% | −18.6% | −1.5% | −59.2% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 1 of 9 | −3.9% | −44.6% | −34.3% | −22.8% | −7.4% | −18.9% | −19.8% | −1.2% | −65.7% | — |
| XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 6 of 9 | −3.2% | −32.4% | −31.1% | −23.8% | −6.7% | −12.7% | −15.9% | −2.1% | −53.0% | −82.0% |
| IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 5 of 9 | −4.9% | −36.3% | −30.3% | −22.2% | −6.2% | −21.5% | −22.4% | −2.5% | −49.8% | — |
| PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 1 of 9 | −4.2% | −43.4% | −36.6% | −23.9% | −8.2% | −20.5% | −30.2% | −2.4% | −59.2% | — |
| FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 1 of 5 | −3.6% | −42.7% | −34.8% | −23.4% | −8.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 7 of 9 | −3.1% | −33.4% | −28.6% | −22.7% | −6.8% | −16.1% | −16.1% | −2.5% | −53.4% | −83.0% |
| AIQ Global X - Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 3 of 4 | −4.0% | −40.6% | −31.9% | −23.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0 of 2 | −4.1% | −44.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 4 of 4 | −2.5% | −36.3% | −32.9% | −16.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XSD State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 2 of 9 | −4.8% | −40.6% | −35.9% | −22.2% | −8.1% | −18.6% | −27.5% | −1.1% | −63.5% | — |
| SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0 of 1 | −3.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does SMH move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares SMH with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- None of the seven popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than SMH's 1.47.
- Over the past 10 years, SMH captured 159% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 108% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.46. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- XLK took just 100% of the S&P 500's losses, against 108% for SMH, while still keeping 128% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than SMH's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH This pageVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 159% | 108% | 1.47 | 1.46 |
| SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 156% | 112% | 1.39 | 1.50 |
| PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 150% | 110% | 1.36 | 1.54 |
| FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 146% | 108% | 1.34 | 1.47 |
| XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 128% | 100% | 1.28 | 1.19 |
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | 118% | 102% | 1.16 | 1.13 |
| XSD State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 151% | 133% | 1.13 | 1.65 |
| IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 112% | 114% | 0.99 | 1.10 |
What diversifies SMH?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with SMH's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing SMH with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in SMH into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+37.4% for SMH alone, +38.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of SMH over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.47 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, MCK and MPC have moved largely independently of SMH over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.12 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which SMH lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% SMH and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2008 | 2006 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | −44.7% | −6.7% | −19.3% | −47.0% | −14.6% | 34.7% | +37.4% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.27 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.3% | +34.2% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.47 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 29.1% | +36.2% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.26 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 28.7% | +33.8% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.34 | +140% | 0.97 | −5.2% | −15.3% | −15.6% | −36.8% | +49.2% | +30.2% | −13.6% | −9.2% | 29.3% | +35.0% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.07 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +4.9% | +22.6% | — | — | — | 28.2% | +34.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.02 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −39.0% | +18.0% | +33.8% | −14.8% | −18.2% | 28.2% | +36.3% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.12 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −12.6% | −25.7% | — | — | — | — | — | 28.5% | +34.7% |
| EFV InternationaliShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 0.39 | +89.0% | 0.88 | −5.2% | −14.7% | −5.9% | −41.7% | +30.3% | — | — | — | 29.1% | +33.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2008 | 2006 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | −44.7% | −6.7% | −19.3% | −47.0% | −14.6% | 34.7% | +37.4% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.12 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | −39.6% | −5.8% | −4.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | 28.9% | +39.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.08 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | −40.4% | −1.2% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | 27.8% | +38.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.07 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 29.0% | +41.7% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.34 | +594% | 1.36 | +24.2% | −37.5% | −36.3% | −67.4% | +5.5% | −14.1% | −33.1% | +9.8% | 30.8% | +41.3% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.23 | +1,008% | 1.34 | +87.5% | −9.8% | −66.7% | −70.0% | +153% | +66.5% | −60.8% | +10.3% | 31.4% | +44.8% |
Common questions
What was SMH's worst drawdown?
SMH's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 83.8%, from June 2000 to November 2008. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were SMH's best and worst years?
Over 25 full calendar years, SMH's best year was 2003, when it returned 87.3%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -47.0%.
Is there a better investment than SMH?
Looking beyond its popular alternatives, DELL (computer hardware) and STX (computer hardware) were ahead of SMH in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (54.4% and 48.7% volatility against 36.9%). Few investments have done better on both counts: only 13 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SMH with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them LLY, GE and BBVA.
Is SMH more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. SMH's volatility over the past 5 years was 36.9%, 2.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SMH's return lands within 36.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is SMH's Sharpe ratio?
SMH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.97, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SMH earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is SMH with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, SMH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.78 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SMH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SMH holding.
What are the best alternatives to SMH?
None of the 11 popular alternatives we compared outperformed SMH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about SMH's strength than about its alternatives.
Did SMH outperform the S&P 500?
SMH finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 16 of 25 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +49.2%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did SMH do in stock market crashes?
SMH fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when SMH fell 44.1% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies SMH?
These had a low correlation with SMH over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.27), DXJ (correlation 0.47) and EMLP (correlation 0.26); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.12), MCK (correlation -0.08) and MPC (correlation 0.07). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than SMH's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of SMH's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to SMH
SOXXiShares Semiconductor ETF
XLKState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1