Relative Intelligence · Semiconductors

How ASE Technology Holding (ASX) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ASX alone. It places ASX (ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ASX stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ASX's full trading record, from October 2000 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, ASX rose 40.6% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its semiconductor peers split over the past 6 months: UMC (United Microelectronics) rose 58.4%, while GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES) fell 19.7%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?ASX held up far better than its industry: it rose 10.5% over the past 3 months while the semiconductors ETF SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) fell 2.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsASX has run far ahead of the market, rising 217% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (469% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termASX turned $10,000 into $107,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. ASX's 10-year return of 967% puts it ahead of 95% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, ASX has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, ASX fell 37.4%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500, and less than semiconductor peers such as TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, 54.3%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, ASX has a correlation of 0.56 over 5 years, more closely than 84% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, ASX's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.38: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.3 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 79% as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- MU (Micron Technology, semiconductors) and DELL (Dell Technologies, computer hardware) were ahead of ASX in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (57.1% and 54.4% volatility against 43.0%).
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only four of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ASX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras), PBR-A (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras) and MPC (Marathon Petroleum).
How much would $10,000 in ASX have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ASX over the past 25 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ASX over the same span and ASX's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in ASX at the end of September 2001 would have grown to $415,507 by September 2026, more than the $114,557 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ASX, and NVDA finished highest, at $10,952,339.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2001 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 159 of the 1,326 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ASX; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$11M+109,423% total · +32.3% a year
- LRCX$2M+22,556% total · +24.2% a year
- TSM$1M+13,478% total · +21.7% a year
- CAMT$862,535+8,525% total · +19.5% a year
- AMD$750,615+7,406% total · +18.9% a year
- AMAT$497,885+4,879% total · +16.9% a year
- ASX$415,507+4,055% total · +16.1% a year
- ONTO$173,816+1,638% total · +12.1% a year
- UMC$120,060+1,101% total · +10.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$114,557+1,046% total · +10.2% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 56 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ASX; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MU$153,675+1,437% total · +72.7% a year
- DELL$112,363+1,024% total · +62.2% a year
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- INSW$102,075+921% total · +59.1% a year
- LPG$96,257+863% total · +57.3% a year
- MPC$71,516+615% total · +48.2% a year
- ASX$70,798+608% total · +47.9% a year
- AMD$59,452+495% total · +42.8% a year
- UMC$28,085+181% total · +22.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
ASX at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- ASX's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 79.5%, from July 2007 to December 2008. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 25 full calendar years, ASX's best was 2009, when it returned 156%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 63.2%. It lost money in nine of those years.
- ASX is 14.3% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $90B
- Industry
- Semiconductors
- Price history from
- October 2000
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +217%total return
- Past 3 years
- +469%+78.6% a year
- Past 5 years
- +631%+48.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +967%+26.7% a year
- Best calendar year
- +156%2009
- Worst calendar year
- −63.2%2008
- Losing years
- 9 of 25full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 43.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.15return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −79.5%Jul 2007 to Dec 2008
- From its all-time high
- −14.3%below the peak
ASX against the whole market
Where ASX ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ASX rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ASX on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ASX stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- ASX's 1-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ASX | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +217% | 29 of 3,287 | top 1% |
| 3-year return | +469% | 117 of 3,017 | top 4% |
| 5-year return | +631% | 48 of 2,893 | top 2% |
| 10-year return | +967% | 112 of 2,202 | top 5% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 43.0% | 1,609 of 2,893 | bottom 45% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.15 | 33 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −52.5% | 553 of 2,187 | top 25% |
What has beaten ASX on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ASX sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ASX with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Four stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ASX over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half ASX's swings, MPC has the best return for its risk: 51.2% a year at 33.4% volatility, 22% less than ASX's 43.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.41 against 1.15 for ASX. INSW earned the most, 56.5% a year, while still swinging less than ASX (40.5% against 43.0%).
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ASX. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than ASX?
Investments that beat ASX over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MU (semiconductors) and DELL (computer hardware) were ahead of ASX in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (57.1% and 54.4% volatility against 43.0%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only four of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ASX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PBR, PBR-A and MPC.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ASX over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ASX's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ASX follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ASX's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ASX's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ASX's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ASX?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.56 | 0.09% | |||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 3 shownEverything else in Semiconductors and the categories next to it (Semiconductor Equipment, Computer Hardware, Communications Equipment, Software), plus ASX's specific themes. 3 of 130 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +5,243% | 0.70 | — | ||
| On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.15 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.47 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 13 of 3,484 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.13 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | -0.02 | — | ||
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | 0.13 | — | |
LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +1,821% | 0.17 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatility | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.40 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for ASX
- Annual return
- ASX returned 48.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $73,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ASX's volatility over the past 5 years was 43.0%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ASX's return lands within 43.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ASX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.15, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ASX earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ASX's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 52.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 52.5% fall takes a 110% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ASX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.56 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ASX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ASX holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 4 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ASX with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with ASX | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.13 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.02 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | -0.02 | — | |
| 4 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | 0.13 | — |
ASX against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ASX, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ASX's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ASX, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 19 popular alternatives earned more than ASX over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 17 of the 19 popular alternatives earned less than ASX over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, ASX returned 48.9% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (43.0% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than ASX with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| ASX This pageASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | +48.9% | 43.0% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | +48.3% | 44.5% |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | +37.4% | 49.9% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | +35.7% | 57.6% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | +32.0% | 47.3% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +31.5% | 38.5% |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | +28.0% | 55.1% |
| CAMT Camtek Ltd. | +27.0% | 58.0% |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | +25.8% | 47.4% |
| FORM FormFactor, Inc. | +24.7% | 61.7% |
| ONTO Onto Innovation Inc. | +24.6% | 59.6% |
| UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | +19.9% | 43.2% |
| IMOS ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. | +17.9% | 46.9% |
| AMKR Amkor Technology, Inc. | +14.1% | 56.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | +12.4% | 55.6% |
| COHU Cohu, Inc. | +11.0% | 51.1% |
| KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | +10.4% | 46.5% |
| ACMR ACM Research, Inc. | +9.1% | 82.3% |
| HIMX Himax Technologies, Inc. | +8.6% | 62.8% |
Has ASX consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ASX with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ASX helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives outperformed ASX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was NVDA.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ASX over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ASX ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (this page) | — | −6.8% | +10.5% | +40.6% | +144% | +217% | +469% | +631% | +967% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | — | $90B | — |
| NVDA SemiconductorsNVIDIA Corporation | 1/5 short2/3 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| UMC SemiconductorsUnited Microelectronics Corporation | 2/5 short1/3 long | −22.7% | −3.1% | +58.4% | +155% | +166% | +202% | +147% | +1,610% | 43.2% | 0.63 | −54.3% | — | $49B | — |
| AMD SemiconductorsAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −13.1% | +6.2% | +94.5% | +139% | +122% | +425% | +359% | +7,583% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | — | $873B | — |
| TSM SemiconductorsTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 1/5 short1/3 long | −4.5% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +34.0% | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | — | $2.2T | — |
| CAMT SemiconductorsCamtek Ltd. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −14.5% | −13.0% | −30.7% | +10.7% | +4.1% | +149% | +231% | +4,551% | 58.0% | 0.70 | −63.2% | — | $6.0B | — |
| LRCX SemiconductorsLam Research Corporation | 0/5 short1/3 long | −12.8% | −14.0% | +0.3% | +42.8% | +83.7% | +350% | +390% | +2,989% | 49.9% | 0.89 | −56.4% | — | $330B | — |
| AVGO SemiconductorsBroadcom Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −7.8% | −11.4% | −16.0% | −3.3% | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | — | $1.6T | — |
| AMAT SemiconductorsApplied Materials, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −12.8% | −22.9% | +3.7% | +51.2% | +78.5% | +209% | +215% | +1,488% | 47.4% | 0.72 | −55.1% | — | $321B | — |
| ONTO SemiconductorsOnto Innovation Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −20.4% | −21.2% | −25.6% | +32.4% | +61.9% | +86.2% | +200% | +1,005% | 59.6% | 0.67 | −62.8% | — | $11B | — |
| KLIC SemiconductorsKulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −4.3% | −19.4% | −3.2% | +67.6% | +106% | +95.7% | +64.1% | +598% | 46.5% | 0.45 | −60.4% | — | $4.2B | — |
| MTSI SemiconductorsMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −5.8% | −2.5% | −6.5% | +50.3% | +87.4% | +249% | +302% | +588% | 47.3% | 0.83 | −80.8% | — | $20B | — |
| SIMO SemiconductorsSilicon Motion Technology Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −20.6% | −15.2% | +54.7% | +130% | +125% | +320% | +243% | +494% | 55.1% | 0.71 | −56.5% | — | $7.2B | — |
| IMOS SemiconductorsChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −6.5% | −3.4% | +42.0% | +102% | +192% | +172% | +128% | +366% | 46.9% | 0.58 | −64.0% | — | $2.1B | — |
| GFS SemiconductorsGLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.0% | −17.0% | −19.7% | +28.0% | +32.7% | −13.2% | — | — | — | — | −61.5% | — | $26B | — |
| FORM SemiconductorsFormFactor, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −9.7% | +2.3% | −25.2% | +82.0% | +144% | +227% | +201% | +964% | 61.7% | 0.67 | −64.4% | — | $8.4B | — |
| COHU SemiconductorsCohu, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −13.0% | +2.3% | +19.1% | +114% | +132% | +61.0% | +68.5% | +406% | 51.1% | 0.46 | −73.6% | — | $2.5B | — |
| AMKR SemiconductorsAmkor Technology, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −20.1% | −33.2% | −39.8% | −2.4% | +30.1% | +97.6% | +93.5% | +363% | 56.2% | 0.52 | −65.9% | — | $10B | — |
| INTC SemiconductorsIntel Corp. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −24.7% | −5.5% | +39.6% | +133% | +141% | +167% | +79.8% | +219% | 55.6% | 0.49 | −70.8% | — | $485B | — |
| HIMX SemiconductorsHimax Technologies, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −18.9% | −6.6% | +9.7% | +41.4% | +26.6% | +135% | +51.0% | +105% | 62.8% | 0.44 | −86.7% | — | $2.1B | — |
| ACMR SemiconductorsACM Research, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −24.5% | −33.4% | +10.6% | +22.5% | +38.1% | +208% | +54.8% | — | 82.3% | 0.51 | −87.2% | — | $3.6B | — |
How did ASX do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2001, along with where ASX ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ASX and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Among its popular alternatives, AVGO came out ahead of ASX most often, in 13 of the 16 years both traded.
- ASX finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 25 full calendar years.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ASX finished in the top quarter in four of 25 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 6 of 21.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ASX; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ASX among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ASX | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASX This pageASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | — | +65.7% | +10.1% | +60.7% | −13.0% | +38.3% | +8.1% | +53.7% | −37.2% | +33.6% | −7.4% | −1.4% | +32.5% | +17.0% | +1.3% | −23.4% | +31.1% | +156% | −63.2% | −9.1% | +25.8% | +20.1% | −25.6% | +73.3% | −33.5% | +43.0% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 25 | 6 of 21 | 7 of 21 | 11 of 21 | 2 of 21 | 15 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 12 of 19 | 17 of 19 | 11 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 13 of 19 | 7 of 18 | 10 of 18 | 5 of 18 | 7 of 17 | 9 of 17 | 9 of 17 | 6 of 16 | 6 of 15 | 11 of 15 | 10 of 14 | 3 of 14 | 5 of 13 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 25 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 17 of 25 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% | −11.0% | −10.0% | −17.6% | +131% | −76.3% | +37.9% | +102% | +55.2% | +1.6% | +102% | −82.8% | +308% |
| UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 8 of 25 | +28.7% | −19.0% | +39.0% | −40.3% | +43.1% | +232% | +55.4% | −21.9% | +42.2% | −2.7% | −13.2% | +15.2% | +5.7% | −2.8% | −26.9% | −16.8% | +98.2% | −37.7% | −28.9% | +15.3% | −2.2% | −23.6% | +52.9% | −58.0% | +33.7% |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 13 of 25 | +77.3% | −18.1% | +128% | −55.0% | +56.9% | +100.0% | +148% | +79.6% | −9.3% | +295% | +7.5% | −31.0% | +61.3% | −55.6% | −34.0% | −15.5% | +348% | −71.2% | −63.1% | −33.5% | +39.0% | +47.8% | +131% | −59.3% | +14.8% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 13 of 25 | +55.7% | +92.0% | +41.8% | −37.0% | +11.7% | +91.6% | +63.3% | −4.3% | +37.9% | +31.2% | +4.9% | +31.1% | +4.5% | +37.7% | +7.3% | +14.9% | +52.9% | −16.1% | −4.3% | +18.9% | +27.1% | −4.2% | +56.7% | −54.8% | +39.5% |
| CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 12 of 25 | +31.7% | +18.3% | +216% | −52.3% | +110% | +102% | +63.1% | +20.5% | +77.7% | +51.7% | −28.0% | −25.8% | +189% | −19.8% | −38.4% | +13.4% | +625% | −80.0% | −59.5% | −0.8% | −4.1% | +54.3% | +835% | −91.4% | −51.2% |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 17 of 25 | +139% | −6.9% | +88.6% | −40.7% | +53.7% | +64.2% | +119% | −24.4% | +75.1% | +35.3% | +1.5% | +46.5% | +51.0% | −2.5% | −28.5% | +31.9% | +84.1% | −50.7% | −14.6% | +41.6% | +23.5% | −10.5% | +199% | −53.4% | +59.7% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 13 of 16 | +50.6% | +110% | +104% | −13.3% | +56.5% | +45.0% | +29.0% | +2.2% | +48.2% | +23.6% | +46.1% | +93.4% | +70.0% | +12.0% | +3.0% | +55.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 14 of 25 | +59.6% | +1.1% | +68.0% | −37.5% | +83.6% | +43.3% | +89.9% | −34.9% | +59.8% | +75.7% | −23.5% | +43.7% | +58.6% | +10.2% | −21.9% | +3.0% | +40.4% | −42.1% | −2.6% | +3.8% | +5.4% | −23.8% | +72.3% | −35.0% | +5.0% |
| ONTO Onto Innovation Inc. | 11 of 25 | −5.3% | +9.0% | +125% | −32.7% | +113% | +30.1% | +33.7% | +9.7% | −0.6% | +65.5% | −10.0% | −11.7% | +32.1% | −21.7% | +43.6% | +13.2% | +894% | −88.4% | +24.6% | −28.1% | −31.8% | +9.6% | +251% | −78.4% | +40.5% |
| KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 11 of 25 | −0.3% | −13.2% | +25.4% | −25.8% | +92.4% | +19.4% | +36.9% | −15.4% | +52.6% | +36.6% | −19.3% | +8.7% | +11.0% | +29.6% | +28.4% | +33.6% | +218% | −75.3% | −18.4% | −5.0% | +2.5% | −40.0% | +152% | −66.7% | +52.5% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 7 of 13 | +31.8% | +39.8% | +47.6% | −19.6% | +42.3% | +107% | +83.3% | −55.4% | −29.7% | +13.2% | +30.7% | +84.1% | +13.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 9 of 20 | +76.9% | −8.9% | −4.9% | −30.4% | +102% | −1.8% | +51.7% | −33.1% | +27.1% | +37.6% | +35.4% | +72.5% | +4.6% | −30.5% | +381% | +24.5% | +48.8% | −87.1% | +12.1% | +32.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| IMOS ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. | 10 of 24 | +62.7% | −28.6% | +32.8% | −34.1% | +48.6% | +12.4% | +38.6% | +3.2% | +29.3% | −28.7% | −15.1% | +21.2% | +65.8% | +125% | −15.6% | +116% | +184% | −94.1% | −37.3% | +17.1% | −8.9% | −32.2% | +267% | +28.1% | — |
| GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 0 of 4 | −18.6% | −29.2% | +12.4% | −17.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FORM FormFactor, Inc. | 12 of 22 | +26.8% | +5.5% | +87.6% | −51.4% | +6.3% | +65.6% | +84.3% | −10.0% | +39.7% | +24.4% | +4.7% | +43.1% | +31.8% | −9.9% | −43.0% | −59.2% | +49.1% | −55.9% | −11.1% | +52.5% | −10.0% | +37.1% | — | — | — |
| COHU Cohu, Inc. | 9 of 25 | −12.8% | −24.6% | +10.4% | −15.9% | −0.2% | +67.5% | +44.3% | −26.0% | +59.9% | +17.6% | +3.6% | +15.9% | −0.8% | −2.1% | −30.2% | +21.1% | +17.6% | −19.2% | −23.1% | −10.7% | +24.5% | −2.1% | +31.9% | −24.7% | +43.3% |
| AMKR Amkor Technology, Inc. | 10 of 25 | +55.9% | −20.8% | +40.4% | −2.3% | +65.5% | +16.4% | +98.2% | −34.7% | −4.8% | +73.4% | −14.3% | +15.8% | +44.5% | −2.7% | −41.2% | +3.5% | +229% | −74.5% | −8.7% | +66.9% | −16.2% | −63.2% | +281% | −70.3% | +3.3% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 10 of 25 | +84.0% | −59.6% | +94.5% | −46.6% | +6.0% | −14.7% | +30.7% | +4.2% | +30.9% | +8.7% | −2.2% | +44.3% | +30.9% | −12.0% | +19.4% | +6.3% | +43.9% | −43.5% | +34.2% | −17.2% | +8.1% | −26.6% | +107% | −50.3% | +4.9% |
| HIMX Himax Technologies, Inc. | 9 of 19 | +5.9% | +37.2% | +4.7% | −54.9% | +120% | +179% | −22.7% | −66.6% | +77.5% | −25.4% | +5.3% | −42.7% | +544% | +149% | −55.2% | −7.2% | +88.3% | −59.9% | −6.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ACMR ACM Research, Inc. | 5 of 8 | +161% | −22.7% | +153% | −72.9% | +5.0% | +340% | +69.4% | +107% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How ASX has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ASX's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ASX's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2000, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of ASX's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after ASX fell 79.5% from July 2007 to December 2008; it did not regain that peak until May 2014, five years later.
Green means ASX fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ASX fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −79.5% | −43.6% | Jul 2007 | Dec 2008 | 17 months | May 2014 | 5.4 years |
| Dot-com bust | −74.5% | −38.8% | Oct 2000 | Mar 2003 | 2.4 years | Jun 2007 | 4.3 years |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −52.5% | −13.3% | Apr 2018 | Mar 2020 | 23 months | Jan 2021 | 10 months |
| 2022 bear market | −46.1% | −17.5% | Aug 2021 | Oct 2022 | 14 months | Jun 2023 | 8 months |
| No named crash | −40.6% | −9.9% | Jul 2024 | Apr 2025 | 9 months | Oct 2025 | 6 months |
How did ASX do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ASX, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: ASX began trading on October 2, 2000, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- ASX fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when ASX fell 75.3% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, UMC held up best, falling less than ASX in six of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- ASX began trading after the dot-com bust, but ten of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was AMAT's 82.0%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ASX.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASX This pageASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | — | −4.7% | −37.4% | −36.5% | −25.1% | −8.0% | −19.3% | −26.2% | 0.0% | −75.3% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 1 of 9 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 6 of 9 | −2.0% | −51.0% | −17.1% | −36.2% | −4.4% | −16.6% | −24.9% | 0.0% | −63.0% | — |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −3.9% | −60.1% | −34.3% | −48.9% | −9.9% | −40.0% | −41.5% | 0.0% | −87.6% | −93.3% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 6 of 9 | −3.9% | −54.3% | −23.3% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −13.2% | −15.7% | 0.0% | −48.0% | −82.4% |
| CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 0 of 9 | −5.6% | −52.0% | −46.5% | −27.1% | −10.9% | −42.1% | −47.6% | 0.0% | −90.8% | — |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 4 of 9 | −3.3% | −55.1% | −43.7% | −22.9% | −9.5% | −20.5% | −20.1% | −2.2% | −73.3% | −87.9% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 4 of 8 | −2.8% | −34.3% | −46.8% | −15.2% | −4.5% | −21.6% | −26.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −3.6% | −54.2% | −43.6% | −26.4% | −9.7% | −18.8% | −24.5% | −1.6% | −61.7% | −82.0% |
| ONTO Onto Innovation Inc. | 2 of 9 | −4.6% | −44.0% | −45.9% | −31.8% | −5.5% | −18.6% | −28.4% | 0.0% | −92.6% | −96.8% |
| KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −3.1% | −41.2% | −28.8% | −28.2% | −7.2% | −18.9% | −33.3% | −6.0% | −87.0% | −95.3% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −4.8% | −43.9% | −48.1% | −37.0% | −41.5% | −22.4% | — | — | — | — |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 0 of 9 | −7.3% | −38.1% | −36.8% | −40.2% | −12.4% | −19.2% | −30.8% | −1.5% | −92.4% | — |
| IMOS ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. | 3 of 9 | −2.8% | −48.2% | −28.6% | −20.4% | −7.5% | −22.7% | −41.7% | −5.0% | −96.9% | — |
| GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 0 of 2 | −5.1% | −50.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FORM FormFactor, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −3.1% | −45.2% | −35.8% | −22.6% | −11.6% | −31.9% | −38.0% | −3.5% | −72.9% | — |
| COHU Cohu, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −2.4% | −36.8% | −57.1% | −42.2% | −6.0% | −16.3% | −30.1% | −6.3% | −64.4% | −82.1% |
| AMKR Amkor Technology, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −5.9% | −39.9% | −55.5% | −26.5% | −9.3% | −25.1% | −33.8% | −0.8% | −87.5% | −98.2% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 6 of 9 | −1.0% | −54.1% | −33.5% | −13.0% | −6.7% | −19.7% | −16.2% | −0.9% | −55.2% | −82.3% |
| HIMX Himax Technologies, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −5.4% | −56.8% | −61.3% | −51.5% | −9.8% | −27.2% | −42.2% | −1.4% | −82.2% | — |
| ACMR ACM Research, Inc. | 2 of 5 | −5.9% | −73.0% | −59.6% | −20.6% | −5.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does ASX move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ASX with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, ASX captured 126% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 79% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.38. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- UMC took just 52% of the S&P 500's losses, against 79% for ASX, while still keeping 133% of its gains.
- Seven of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ASX's 1.59, led by UMC, CAMT and AVGO.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ASX's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASX This pageASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | 126% | 79% | 1.59 | 1.38 |
| UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 133% | 52% | 2.56 | 1.33 |
| CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 191% | 96% | 1.99 | 1.60 |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86% | 1.85 | 1.19 |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75% | 1.84 | 1.15 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 183% | 104% | 1.75 | 1.56 |
| FORM FormFactor, Inc. | 132% | 81% | 1.64 | 1.29 |
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 152% | 97% | 1.58 | 1.51 |
| ONTO Onto Innovation Inc. | 139% | 92% | 1.50 | 1.41 |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 254% | 179% | 1.42 | 2.25 |
| KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 131% | 111% | 1.18 | 1.44 |
| SIMO Silicon Motion Technology Corporation | 126% | 116% | 1.09 | 1.41 |
| COHU Cohu, Inc. | 122% | 116% | 1.05 | 1.65 |
| IMOS ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. | 117% | 113% | 1.04 | 1.07 |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 98% | 100% | 0.98 | 1.43 |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 148% | 157% | 0.94 | 1.93 |
| AMKR Amkor Technology, Inc. | 152% | 174% | 0.88 | 1.94 |
| HIMX Himax Technologies, Inc. | 133% | 197% | 0.68 | 2.12 |
What diversifies ASX?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ASX's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ASX with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ASX into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+47.9% for ASX alone, +47.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, GCOW and EMLP have moved largely independently of ASX over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.32 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in six of the nine calendar years in which ASX lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ASX lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ASX and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2016 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2004 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASX ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (this page) | 1.00 | +631% | 1.15 | −13.0% | −37.2% | −7.4% | −1.4% | −23.4% | −63.2% | −9.1% | −25.6% | −33.5% | 46.6% | +47.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.32 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.9% | +43.0% |
| GCOW InternationalPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 0.27 | +93.4% | 1.04 | +5.5% | −8.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 38.1% | +42.2% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.21 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −8.7% | +29.8% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 38.0% | +42.8% |
| FJUN Multi-AssetFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.47 | +65.4% | 1.01 | −5.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 38.2% | +41.4% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.19 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −3.0% | +15.9% | −0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 37.9% | +42.0% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.48 | +62.9% | 0.99 | −5.6% | −4.8% | +6.5% | +4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | 38.1% | +41.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.13 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | +8.0% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | — | 37.9% | +43.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.01 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | +28.0% | −21.5% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +33.8% | −14.8% | 37.6% | +45.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2016 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2004 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASX ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (this page) | 1.00 | +631% | 1.15 | −13.0% | −37.2% | −7.4% | −1.4% | −23.4% | −63.2% | −9.1% | −25.6% | −33.5% | 46.6% | +47.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.26 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | −17.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −4.7% | −8.3% | 39.0% | +48.0% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.42 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | +7.4% | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −6.4% | −65.1% | 43.4% | +62.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.40 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +18.3% | +67.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +40.0% | −9.4% | 41.6% | +57.9% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.01 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −28.3% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −1.4% | −27.2% | 37.5% | +47.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.13 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +0.7% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 38.6% | +50.9% |
Common questions
What was ASX's worst drawdown?
ASX's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 79.5%, from July 2007 to December 2008. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were ASX's best and worst years?
Over 25 full calendar years, ASX's best year was 2009, when it returned 156%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -63.2%.
Is there a better investment than ASX?
Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MU (semiconductors) and DELL (computer hardware) were ahead of ASX in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (57.1% and 54.4% volatility against 43.0%). Few investments have done better on both counts: only four of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ASX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PBR, PBR-A and MPC.
Is ASX more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ASX's volatility over the past 5 years was 43.0%, 2.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ASX's return lands within 43.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ASX's Sharpe ratio?
ASX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.15, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ASX earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ASX with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ASX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.56 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ASX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ASX holding.
What are the best alternatives to ASX?
None of the 20 popular alternatives we compared outperformed ASX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about ASX's strength than about its alternatives.
Did ASX outperform the S&P 500?
ASX finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 25 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +65.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ASX do in stock market crashes?
ASX fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when ASX fell 75.3% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies ASX?
These had a low correlation with ASX over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.32), GCOW (correlation 0.27) and EMLP (correlation 0.21); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.26), CLS (correlation 0.42) and FIX (correlation 0.40). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ASX's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ASX's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to ASX
NVDANVIDIA
UMCUnited Microelectronics
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
LRCXLam Research
AVGOBroadcom
AMATApplied Materials
INTCIntel