Relative Intelligence · Semiconductor Equipment

How Applied Materials (AMAT) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on AMAT alone. It places AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where AMAT stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: AMAT's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowAMAT has gone against the market, falling 22.9% over the past 3 months while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. AMAT is 43.9% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is AMAT's own: it fell 22.9% over the past 3 months while the semiconductor equipment ETF SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) fell 2.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its semiconductor equipment peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: ASML (ASML Holding) fell 6.1%, while UCTT (Ultra Clean) fell 43.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, AMAT rose 78.5% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (209% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termAMAT turned $10,000 into $159,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. AMAT's 10-year return of 1,488% puts it ahead of 97% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, AMAT has typically fallen 1.5 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, AMAT fell 54.2%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than ASML (ASML Holding, 48.4%) but less than TER (Teradyne, 56.6%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, AMAT has a correlation of 0.50 over 5 years, more closely than 74% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing) earned more than AMAT with less volatility over the past 5 years: 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 25.8% a year at 47.4%.
- Whole market
- 112 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than AMAT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), AVGO (Broadcom) and LLY (Eli Lilly and Company).
How much would $10,000 in AMAT have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in AMAT over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of AMAT over the same span and AMAT's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in AMAT at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $594,575 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of AMAT, and LRCX finished highest, at $2,488,626.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 79 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AMAT; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LRCX$2M+24,786% total · +21.0% a year
- KLAC$1M+10,976% total · +17.6% a year
- FIX$1M+10,682% total · +17.5% a year
- ASML$984,088+9,741% total · +17.1% a year
- MU$629,766+6,198% total · +15.4% a year
- AMAT$594,575+5,846% total · +15.1% a year
- TER$161,859+1,519% total · +10.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- KLIC$46,988+370% total · +5.5% a year
- COHU$36,015+260% total · +4.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 188 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AMAT; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MU$153,675+1,437% total · +72.7% a year
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- KLAC$61,203+512% total · +43.7% a year
- LRCX$60,701+507% total · +43.4% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- AMAT$41,406+314% total · +32.9% a year
- CAMT$38,960+290% total · +31.3% a year
- NVMI$37,658+277% total · +30.4% a year
- TER$37,422+274% total · +30.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
AMAT at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- AMAT is still 43.9% below its all-time high.
- AMAT's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 85.2%, from April 2000 to November 2008. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, AMAT's best was 1999, when it returned 197%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 42.1%. It lost money in nine of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $321B
- Industry
- Semiconductors
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +78.5%total return
- Past 3 years
- +209%+45.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +215%+25.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +1,488%+31.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +197%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −42.1%2008
- Losing years
- 9 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 47.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.72return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −85.2%Apr 2000 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −43.9%below the peak
AMAT against the whole market
Where AMAT ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does AMAT rank among all stocks?
This section ranks AMAT on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how AMAT stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- AMAT's 10-year return ranks in the top 3% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | AMAT | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +78.5% | 283 of 3,287 | top 9% |
| 3-year return | +209% | 370 of 3,017 | top 12% |
| 5-year return | +215% | 284 of 2,893 | top 10% |
| 10-year return | +1,488% | 62 of 2,202 | top 3% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 47.4% | 1,815 of 2,893 | bottom 38% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.72 | 421 of 2,893 | top 15% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −55.1% | 680 of 2,187 | top 31% |
What has beaten AMAT on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). AMAT sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than AMAT with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 107 stocks and five ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than AMAT over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 3% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half AMAT's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 48% less than AMAT's 47.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.72 for AMAT. ATI earned the most, 61.8% a year, while still swinging less than AMAT (42.9% against 47.4%).
- Among AMAT's popular alternatives, TSM is in the region. TSM earned 31.5% a year against 25.8% a year for AMAT, at 38.5% volatility, 19% less than AMAT's 47.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to AMAT; faint dots are 86 more of the 112 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than AMAT?
Investments that beat AMAT over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among AMAT's popular alternatives, TSM earned more than AMAT with less volatility over the past 5 years: 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 25.8% a year at 47.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, SMH (semiconductors) and ASX (semiconductors) earned more than AMAT with less volatility over the past 5 years. SMH returned 33.4% a year at 36.9% volatility, against 25.8% a year at 47.4%.
- Across the whole market, 112 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than AMAT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them TSM, AVGO and LLY.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat AMAT over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks AMAT's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than AMAT follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than AMAT's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× AMAT's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than AMAT's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with AMAT?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +25.8% | 47.4% | 0.72 | −55.1% | +1,488% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.50 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against AMAT. 6 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.72 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +38.7% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | +2,534% | 0.93 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +37.4% | 49.9% | 0.89 | −56.4% | +2,989% | 0.88 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +5,243% | 0.60 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +24.0% | 54.3% | 0.67 | −59.1% | +1,565% | 0.73 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Semiconductor Equipment and Semiconductors and the categories next to it (Computer Hardware, Communications Equipment, Software), plus AMAT's specific themes. 22 of 132 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.77 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.70 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.28 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.34 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.30 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +3,439% | 0.37 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 183 of 3,481 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.21 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.03 | — | ||
JXNJackson Financial Inc. · Life Insurance | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +41.7% | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | — | 0.11 | — | |
SOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +28.3% | 38.9% | 0.84 | −46.0% | — | 0.77 | 0.19% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.21 | — | ||
EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.32 | 0.59% | |
What these numbers mean for AMAT
- Annual return
- AMAT returned 25.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $31,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- AMAT's volatility over the past 5 years was 47.4%, 2.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AMAT's return lands within 47.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- AMAT's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.72, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AMAT earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- AMAT's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 55.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 55.1% fall takes a 123% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, AMAT's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AMAT instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AMAT holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 112 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than AMAT with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with AMAT | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.26 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.21 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.03 | — | |
| 4 | JXNJackson Financial Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +41.7% | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | — | 0.11 | — |
| 5 | Same or nearby category | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.77 | 0.35% | |
| 6 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | 0.14 | — |
| 7 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.30 | — |
| 8 | SOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Whole market | +28.3% | 38.9% | 0.84 | −46.0% | — | 0.77 | 0.19% |
| 9 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | 0.28 | — |
| 10 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.35 | — | |
| 11 | NWPXNWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +32.5% | 36.2% | 0.96 | −46.5% | +682% | 0.46 | — |
| 12 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | 0.06 | — |
| 13 | Whole market | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +332% | 0.25 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.17 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.12 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.34 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.20 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.64 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.05 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.70 | — | |
| 21 | FTITechnipFMC plc · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +54.1% | 41.3% | 1.26 | −85.8% | +178% | 0.19 | — |
| 22 | Whole market | +32.2% | 42.8% | 0.86 | −85.5% | −3.6% | 0.13 | — | |
| 23 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.40 | — |
| 24 | NWGNatWest Group plc · Banks | Whole market | +27.7% | 34.1% | 0.89 | −67.4% | +495% | 0.28 | — |
| 25 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.23 | — |
| 26 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.23 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.46 | — | |
| 28 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | 0.25 | — |
| 29 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.53 | — |
| 30 | Popular alternative | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.72 | — | |
| 31 | Same or nearby category | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.70 | — | |
| 32 | EMBJEmbraer S.A. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +32.8% | 45.0% | 0.86 | −85.2% | +283% | 0.29 | — |
| 33 | Same or nearby category | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.28 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +510% | 0.00 | — | |
| 35 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | -0.08 | — |
| 36 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | 0.37 | — |
| 37 | Same or nearby category | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.34 | — | |
| 38 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.30 | — |
| 39 | LGNDLigand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated · Biotechnology | Whole market | +30.2% | 44.2% | 0.82 | −76.9% | +414% | 0.49 | — |
| 40 | ENVAEnova International, Inc. · Consumer Finance | Whole market | +37.8% | 41.9% | 0.98 | −77.6% | +1,819% | 0.40 | — |
| 41 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.39 | — |
| 42 | CHEFThe Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +27.5% | 39.8% | 0.81 | −91.3% | +787% | 0.28 | — |
| 43 | WTWisdomTree, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +31.4% | 32.8% | 1.00 | −84.0% | +174% | 0.18 | — |
| 44 | LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +1,821% | 0.03 | — |
| 45 | GTXGarrett Motion Inc. · Auto Parts | Whole market | +27.0% | 41.4% | 0.78 | −93.1% | — | 0.29 | — |
| 46 | AAMIAcadian Asset Management · Asset Management | Whole market | +29.0% | 35.6% | 0.90 | −78.1% | +652% | 0.14 | — |
| 47 | Same or nearby category | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.30 | — | |
| 48 | DCODucommun Incorporated · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +27.5% | 34.5% | 0.88 | −70.8% | +706% | 0.45 | — |
| 49 | EZPWEZCORP, Inc. · Financial - Credit Services | Whole market | +33.2% | 35.4% | 0.99 | −76.6% | +202% | 0.30 | — |
| 50 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.02 | — | |
| 51 | ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings, Inc. · Auto Parts | Whole market | +27.3% | 29.9% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +367% | 0.23 | — |
| 52 | TKTeekay Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +47.1% | 41.7% | 1.13 | −83.8% | +244% | 0.04 | — |
| 53 | SNEXStoneX Group Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +33.0% | 37.3% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +670% | 0.18 | — |
| 54 | UVEUniversal Insurance Holdings, Inc. · Insurance - Property & Casualty | Whole market | +34.3% | 42.8% | 0.91 | −79.6% | +216% | 0.21 | — |
| 55 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.35 | — | |
| 56 | TFPMTriple Flag Precious Metals Corp. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +29.3% | 37.7% | 0.87 | −36.2% | — | -0.09 | — |
| 57 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +1,050% | 0.08 | — |
| 58 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.32 | 0.59% |
| 59 | USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +35.6% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | +803% | -0.06 | — |
| 60 | HWKNHawkins, Inc. · Chemicals - Specialty | Whole market | +29.1% | 36.5% | 0.89 | −44.8% | +627% | 0.08 | — |
| 61 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | -0.11 | — | |
| 62 | ODCOil-Dri Corporation of America · Chemicals - Specialty | Whole market | +35.9% | 36.9% | 1.02 | −48.9% | +460% | 0.32 | — |
| 63 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.17 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.54 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.19 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | -0.02 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.33 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | -0.02 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.51 | — | |
| 70 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | -0.15 | — | |
| 71 | Whole market | +31.4% | 42.1% | 0.86 | −51.5% | +616% | 0.68 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +352% | 0.00 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | 0.04 | — | |
| 74 | STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +32.2% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | +1,018% | 0.25 | — |
| 75 | JBLJabil Inc. · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +35.8% | 39.6% | 0.97 | −57.3% | +1,264% | 0.55 | — |
| 76 | SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP · Water Utilities | Whole market | +39.1% | 37.1% | 1.08 | −62.0% | +293% | 0.28 | — |
| 77 | NVTnVent Electric plc · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +35.4% | 38.0% | 0.99 | −56.2% | — | 0.51 | — |
| 78 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.12 | — |
| 79 | DINOHF Sinclair Corporation · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +31.8% | 38.8% | 0.91 | −77.3% | +649% | 0.00 | — |
| 80 | RLRalph Lauren Corporation · Apparel & Footwear | Whole market | +28.6% | 36.9% | 0.87 | −55.1% | +370% | 0.46 | — |
| 81 | TPRTapestry, Inc. · Luxury Goods | Whole market | +28.1% | 40.8% | 0.82 | −78.9% | +328% | 0.36 | — |
| 82 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | 0.00 | — |
| 83 | MLIMueller Industries, Inc. · Metal Fabrication | Whole market | +38.9% | 33.4% | 1.16 | −53.0% | +800% | 0.20 | — |
| 84 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | 0.34 | — |
| 85 | AGIAlamos Gold Inc. · Gold Mining | Whole market | +32.6% | 42.4% | 0.88 | −66.1% | +294% | -0.02 | — |
| 86 | IDCCInterDigital, Inc. · Intellectual Property Licensing | Whole market | +39.0% | 36.9% | 1.08 | −64.9% | +395% | 0.32 | — |
| 87 | LAURLaureate Education, Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +37.5% | 32.8% | 1.14 | −64.5% | — | 0.13 | — |
| 88 | UGPUltrapar Participações S.A. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +29.5% | 41.5% | 0.83 | −83.3% | −4.0% | 0.18 | — |
| 89 | DRSLeonardo DRS, Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +26.8% | 42.8% | 0.77 | −67.5% | +3,294% | 0.00 | — |
| 90 | DYDycom Industries, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +27.0% | 44.5% | 0.76 | −89.0% | +197% | 0.40 | — |
| 91 | AROCArchrock, Inc. · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +33.1% | 36.4% | 0.97 | −84.9% | +288% | 0.46 | — |
| 92 | CAAPCorporacion America Airports S.A. · Infrastructure | Whole market | +35.1% | 35.9% | 1.02 | −89.9% | — | 0.10 | — |
| 93 | GFFGriffon Corporation · Building Products | Whole market | +36.4% | 41.7% | 0.95 | −61.3% | +761% | 0.39 | — |
| 94 | STNGScorpio Tankers Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +37.9% | 43.6% | 0.96 | −80.6% | +126% | 0.00 | — |
| 95 | GLNGGolar LNG Limited · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +29.4% | 37.8% | 0.87 | −86.3% | +117% | -0.12 | — |
| 96 | ARLPAlliance Resource Partners, L.P. · Coal | Whole market | +29.4% | 31.6% | 0.98 | −85.3% | +173% | -0.05 | — |
| 97 | CVSACovista Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +28.9% | 43.3% | 0.81 | −66.1% | +475% | 0.01 | — |
| 98 | HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc. · Consulting Services | Whole market | +29.7% | 40.7% | 0.84 | −51.4% | +221% | -0.40 | — |
| 99 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.39 | — |
| 100 | CXWCoreCivic, Inc. · Security & Protection Services | Whole market | +26.9% | 44.0% | 0.76 | −77.9% | +197% | 0.25 | — |
AMAT against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against AMAT, compared period by period and year by year.
How do AMAT's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at AMAT, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only KLAC and TSM were both more rewarding and calmer than AMAT over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- 12 of the 20 popular alternatives earned less than AMAT over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, AMAT returned 25.8% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (47.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than AMAT with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| MU Micron Technology, Inc. | +68.2% | 57.1% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | +38.7% | 46.7% |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | +37.4% | 49.9% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +31.5% | 38.5% |
| CAMT Camtek Ltd. | +27.0% | 58.0% |
| AMAT This pageApplied Materials, Inc. | +25.8% | 47.4% |
| NVMI Nova Ltd. | +25.6% | 49.6% |
| FORM FormFactor, Inc. | +24.7% | 61.7% |
| ONTO Onto Innovation Inc. | +24.6% | 59.6% |
| TER Teradyne, Inc. | +24.0% | 54.3% |
| ACLS Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | +17.7% | 57.4% |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | +17.3% | 43.4% |
| VECO Veeco Instruments Inc. | +13.7% | 49.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | +12.4% | 55.6% |
| COHU Cohu, Inc. | +11.0% | 51.1% |
| KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | +10.4% | 46.5% |
| ACMR ACM Research, Inc. | +9.1% | 82.3% |
| UCTT Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. | +3.0% | 63.6% |
| ENTG Entegris, Inc. | +2.2% | 55.4% |
| ICHR Ichor Holdings, Ltd. | +1.3% | 71.1% |
Has AMAT consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares AMAT with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than AMAT helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Four of the 20 popular alternatives, led by MU, NVDA and TER, outperformed AMAT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- MU outperformed AMAT in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- KLAC earned more for the risk it took than AMAT (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than AMAT over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. (this page) | — | −12.8% | −22.9% | +3.7% | +51.2% | +78.5% | +209% | +215% | +1,488% | 47.4% | 0.72 | −55.1% | — | $321B | — |
| MU QualifiedMicron Technology, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −14.2% | +3.6% | +99.9% | +184% | +334% | +1,246% | +1,244% | +5,243% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | — | $1.0T | — |
| NVDA QualifiedNVIDIA Corporation | 3/5 short3/3 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| TER QualifiedTeradyne, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | −11.8% | +0.9% | −10.2% | +62.4% | +142% | +271% | +193% | +1,565% | 54.3% | 0.67 | −59.1% | — | $53B | — |
| TSM QualifiedTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 3/5 short2/3 long | −4.5% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +34.0% | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | — | $2.2T | — |
| LRCX SemiconductorsLam Research Corporation | 2/5 short3/3 long | −12.8% | −14.0% | +0.3% | +42.8% | +83.7% | +350% | +390% | +2,989% | 49.9% | 0.89 | −56.4% | — | $330B | — |
| KLAC SemiconductorsKLA Corporation | 2/5 short3/3 long | −12.1% | −22.0% | −10.2% | +27.4% | +41.0% | +258% | +413% | +2,534% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | — | $211B | — |
| CAMT SemiconductorsCamtek Ltd. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −14.5% | −13.0% | −30.7% | +10.7% | +4.1% | +149% | +231% | +4,551% | 58.0% | 0.70 | −63.2% | — | $6.0B | — |
| NVMI SemiconductorsNova Ltd. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −11.8% | −26.1% | −39.9% | −7.9% | −5.1% | +232% | +213% | +2,512% | 49.6% | 0.71 | −52.8% | — | $10B | — |
| FORM SemiconductorsFormFactor, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −9.7% | +2.3% | −25.2% | +82.0% | +144% | +227% | +201% | +964% | 61.7% | 0.67 | −64.4% | — | $8.4B | — |
| ASML SemiconductorsASML Holding N.V. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −4.7% | −6.1% | +10.8% | +40.8% | +57.5% | +188% | +123% | +1,628% | 43.4% | 0.59 | −56.9% | — | $630B | — |
| KLIC SemiconductorsKulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −4.3% | −19.4% | −3.2% | +67.6% | +106% | +95.7% | +64.1% | +598% | 46.5% | 0.45 | −60.4% | — | $4.2B | — |
| COHU SemiconductorsCohu, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −13.0% | +2.3% | +19.1% | +114% | +132% | +61.0% | +68.5% | +406% | 51.1% | 0.46 | −73.6% | — | $2.5B | — |
| INTC SemiconductorsIntel Corp. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −24.7% | −5.5% | +39.6% | +133% | +141% | +167% | +79.8% | +219% | 55.6% | 0.49 | −70.8% | — | $485B | — |
| ENTG SemiconductorsEntegris, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −0.2% | +6.9% | −3.9% | +59.9% | +54.8% | +59.3% | +11.4% | +823% | 55.4% | 0.32 | −59.3% | — | $22B | — |
| ACLS SemiconductorsAxcelis Technologies, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −0.2% | −14.3% | −13.8% | +31.1% | +34.6% | −21.9% | +126% | +730% | 57.4% | 0.57 | −78.8% | — | $3.5B | — |
| VECO SemiconductorsVeeco Instruments Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +0.8% | −12.1% | −4.6% | +45.9% | +50.9% | +77.7% | +90.3% | +110% | 49.1% | 0.51 | −81.0% | — | $2.7B | — |
| ICHR SemiconductorsIchor Holdings, Ltd. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −24.8% | −49.5% | −34.5% | +107% | +87.0% | +63.9% | +6.6% | — | 71.1% | 0.38 | −77.4% | — | $1.6B | — |
| ONTO SemiconductorsOnto Innovation Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −20.4% | −21.2% | −25.6% | +32.4% | +61.9% | +86.2% | +200% | +1,005% | 59.6% | 0.67 | −62.8% | — | $11B | — |
| UCTT SemiconductorsUltra Clean Holdings, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −29.4% | −43.8% | −35.1% | +88.8% | +76.8% | +108% | +16.2% | +574% | 63.6% | 0.37 | −79.3% | — | $2.3B | — |
| ACMR SemiconductorsACM Research, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −24.5% | −33.4% | +10.6% | +22.5% | +38.1% | +208% | +54.8% | — | 82.3% | 0.51 | −87.2% | — | $3.6B | — |
How did AMAT do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where AMAT ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with AMAT and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, AMAT finished in the top quarter in six of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 21.
- AMAT finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 16 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, NVDA came out ahead of AMAT most often, in 17 of the 26 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of AMAT; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places AMAT among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of AMAT | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAT This pageApplied Materials, Inc. | — | +59.6% | +1.1% | +68.0% | −37.5% | +83.6% | +43.3% | +89.9% | −34.9% | +59.8% | +75.7% | −23.5% | +43.7% | +58.6% | +10.2% | −21.9% | +3.0% | +40.4% | −42.1% | −2.6% | +3.8% | +5.4% | −23.8% | +72.3% | −35.0% | +5.0% | −39.7% | +197% | +41.7% | +67.9% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 29 | 7 of 21 | 10 of 21 | 11 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 8 of 21 | 13 of 21 | 8 of 21 | 18 of 21 | 12 of 20 | 3 of 19 | 15 of 19 | 4 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 6 of 19 | 12 of 19 | 16 of 19 | 18 of 19 | 4 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 12 of 19 | 10 of 19 | 13 of 18 | 12 of 17 | 4 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 7 of 13 | 5 of 12 | 4 of 12 | 3 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 13 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +240% | −1.0% | +71.9% | −45.9% | +24.2% | +39.8% | +69.5% | −22.8% | +87.6% | +54.7% | −59.5% | +60.9% | +243% | +0.8% | −21.6% | −24.1% | +301% | −63.6% | −48.0% | +4.9% | +7.8% | −8.3% | +38.2% | −68.6% | −12.7% | −8.7% | +53.8% | +94.9% | −10.9% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 17 of 26 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% | −11.0% | −10.0% | −17.6% | +131% | −76.3% | +37.9% | +102% | +55.2% | +1.6% | +102% | −82.8% | +308% | +39.6% | — | — | — |
| TER Teradyne, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +54.4% | +16.5% | +24.8% | −46.4% | +36.8% | +76.8% | +119% | −24.4% | +65.8% | +24.3% | +5.8% | +13.4% | +4.3% | +23.9% | −2.9% | +30.9% | +154% | −59.1% | −30.9% | +2.7% | −14.7% | −32.9% | +95.6% | −56.8% | −19.1% | −43.6% | +211% | +32.5% | +31.3% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 14 of 28 | +55.7% | +92.0% | +41.8% | −37.0% | +11.7% | +91.6% | +63.3% | −4.3% | +37.9% | +31.2% | +4.9% | +31.1% | +4.5% | +37.7% | +7.3% | +14.9% | +52.9% | −16.1% | −4.3% | +18.9% | +27.1% | −4.2% | +56.7% | −54.8% | +39.5% | −51.0% | +290% | +13.4% | — |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 16 of 29 | +139% | −6.9% | +88.6% | −40.7% | +53.7% | +64.2% | +119% | −24.4% | +75.1% | +35.3% | +1.5% | +46.5% | +51.0% | −2.5% | −28.5% | +31.9% | +84.1% | −50.7% | −14.6% | +41.6% | +23.5% | −10.5% | +199% | −53.4% | +59.7% | −61.0% | +527% | −39.1% | +4.0% |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 14 of 29 | +94.5% | +9.4% | +56.0% | −11.2% | +68.1% | +47.9% | +104% | −12.4% | +36.7% | +17.0% | +2.1% | +39.4% | +39.0% | +2.1% | +28.8% | +9.9% | +69.8% | −53.5% | −2.7% | +1.9% | +6.2% | −20.3% | +65.8% | −28.7% | +46.6% | −39.3% | +157% | +11.9% | +8.9% |
| CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 11 of 25 | +31.7% | +18.3% | +216% | −52.3% | +110% | +102% | +63.1% | +20.5% | +77.7% | +51.7% | −28.0% | −25.8% | +189% | −19.8% | −38.4% | +13.4% | +625% | −80.0% | −59.5% | −0.8% | −4.1% | +54.3% | +835% | −91.4% | −51.2% | — | — | — | — |
| NVMI Nova Ltd. | 13 of 25 | +66.7% | +43.4% | +68.2% | −44.3% | +108% | +86.6% | +66.1% | −12.1% | +96.9% | +34.3% | −5.7% | +5.6% | +23.3% | +8.3% | −11.3% | +28.6% | +1,014% | −77.6% | −1.5% | +13.4% | −33.1% | −41.0% | +292% | −64.7% | −38.8% | — | — | — | — |
| FORM FormFactor, Inc. | 8 of 22 | +26.8% | +5.5% | +87.6% | −51.4% | +6.3% | +65.6% | +84.3% | −10.0% | +39.7% | +24.4% | +4.7% | +43.1% | +31.8% | −9.9% | −43.0% | −59.2% | +49.1% | −55.9% | −11.1% | +52.5% | −10.0% | +37.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 16 of 29 | +55.8% | −7.7% | +39.9% | −30.5% | +64.1% | +66.3% | +93.2% | −9.7% | +56.5% | +27.9% | −17.1% | +16.2% | +46.9% | +19.7% | +10.4% | +13.2% | +90.9% | −41.4% | +22.3% | +22.7% | +26.1% | −20.6% | +140% | −51.0% | −24.4% | −40.5% | +273% | −9.7% | +171% |
| KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 10 of 29 | −0.3% | −13.2% | +25.4% | −25.8% | +92.4% | +19.4% | +36.9% | −15.4% | +52.6% | +36.6% | −19.3% | +8.7% | +11.0% | +29.6% | +28.4% | +33.6% | +218% | −75.3% | −18.4% | −5.0% | +2.5% | −40.0% | +152% | −66.7% | +52.5% | −47.1% | +140% | −4.6% | −2.1% |
| COHU Cohu, Inc. | 10 of 29 | −12.8% | −24.6% | +10.4% | −15.9% | −0.2% | +67.5% | +44.3% | −26.0% | +59.9% | +17.6% | +3.6% | +15.9% | −0.8% | −2.1% | −30.2% | +21.1% | +17.6% | −19.2% | −23.1% | −10.7% | +24.5% | −2.1% | +31.9% | −24.7% | +43.3% | −54.6% | +185% | −27.2% | +32.7% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 12 of 29 | +84.0% | −59.6% | +94.5% | −46.6% | +6.0% | −14.7% | +30.7% | +4.2% | +30.9% | +8.7% | −2.2% | +44.3% | +30.9% | −12.0% | +19.4% | +6.3% | +43.9% | −43.5% | +34.2% | −17.2% | +8.1% | −26.6% | +107% | −50.3% | +4.9% | −26.9% | +39.1% | +69.0% | +7.4% |
| ENTG Entegris, Inc. | 12 of 25 | −14.6% | −17.0% | +83.5% | −52.5% | +44.6% | +92.9% | +80.8% | −7.5% | +70.5% | +34.9% | +0.4% | +14.0% | +26.3% | +5.2% | +16.8% | +41.4% | +142% | −74.7% | −20.2% | +14.9% | −5.4% | −22.6% | +24.8% | −6.1% | +46.6% | — | — | — | — |
| ACLS Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | 12 of 25 | +15.0% | −46.1% | +63.4% | +6.4% | +156% | +20.8% | +35.4% | −38.0% | +97.3% | +40.4% | +1.2% | +4.9% | +76.8% | +3.8% | −61.6% | +145% | +176% | −88.9% | +216% | +22.2% | −41.3% | −20.4% | +82.2% | −56.5% | +45.2% | — | — | — | — |
| VECO Veeco Instruments Inc. | 9 of 29 | +6.6% | −13.6% | +67.0% | −34.7% | +64.0% | +18.2% | +98.3% | −50.1% | −49.1% | +41.8% | −41.0% | +6.0% | +11.6% | +41.8% | −51.6% | +30.0% | +421% | −62.0% | −10.8% | +8.1% | −17.8% | −25.2% | +144% | −67.9% | −10.2% | −14.3% | −11.9% | +142% | 0.0% |
| ICHR Ichor Holdings, Ltd. | 3 of 9 | −42.8% | −4.2% | +25.4% | −41.7% | +52.7% | −9.4% | +104% | −33.7% | +127% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ONTO Onto Innovation Inc. | 15 of 29 | −5.3% | +9.0% | +125% | −32.7% | +113% | +30.1% | +33.7% | +9.7% | −0.6% | +65.5% | −10.0% | −11.7% | +32.1% | −21.7% | +43.6% | +13.2% | +894% | −88.4% | +24.6% | −28.1% | −31.8% | +9.6% | +251% | −78.4% | +40.5% | −31.4% | +158% | −4.6% | +72.4% |
| UCTT Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. | 10 of 21 | −29.5% | +5.3% | +3.0% | −42.2% | +84.1% | +32.7% | +177% | −63.3% | +138% | +89.5% | −44.8% | −7.5% | +104% | −19.6% | −34.4% | +33.2% | +248% | −83.5% | −1.2% | +70.6% | +19.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ACMR ACM Research, Inc. | 4 of 8 | +161% | −22.7% | +153% | −72.9% | +5.0% | +340% | +69.4% | +107% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How AMAT has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were AMAT's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents AMAT's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of AMAT's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: AMAT fell 62.0% from August 1995 to July 1996, while the S&P 500 rose 14.1%.
- The slowest recovery came after AMAT fell 85.2% from April 2000 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until May 2017, eight years later.
Green means AMAT fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | AMAT fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −85.2% | −42.6% | Apr 2000 | Nov 2008 | 8.6 years | May 2017 | 8.5 years |
| No named crash | −65.4% | — | Oct 1987 | Oct 1987 | Under a month | Jun 1988 | 8 months |
| No named crash | −62.0% | +14.1% | Aug 1995 | Jul 1996 | 11 months | May 1997 | 10 months |
| No named crash | −58.8% | — | Jul 1990 | Nov 1990 | 4 months | Feb 1992 | 15 months |
| No named crash | −58.6% | +4.3% | Aug 1997 | Oct 1998 | 14 months | Jan 1999 | 3 months |
How did AMAT do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far AMAT, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- AMAT fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when AMAT fell 82.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, KLAC held up best, falling less than AMAT in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than AMAT.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAT This pageApplied Materials, Inc. | — | −3.6% | −54.2% | −43.6% | −26.4% | −9.7% | −18.8% | −24.5% | −1.6% | −61.7% | −82.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −5.3% | −49.6% | −42.5% | −36.6% | −8.8% | −49.4% | −46.5% | −2.0% | −84.2% | −87.8% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 3 of 10 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| TER Teradyne, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −1.9% | −56.6% | −34.8% | −24.6% | −10.7% | −18.3% | −28.2% | −2.5% | −79.2% | −93.4% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 6 of 10 | −3.9% | −54.3% | −23.3% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −13.2% | −15.7% | 0.0% | −48.0% | −82.4% |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 2 of 10 | −3.3% | −55.1% | −43.7% | −22.9% | −9.5% | −20.5% | −20.1% | −2.2% | −73.3% | −87.9% |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 7 of 10 | −5.9% | −37.6% | −33.8% | −21.6% | −7.5% | −13.5% | −23.0% | −2.8% | −71.8% | −73.2% |
| CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 2 of 9 | −5.6% | −52.0% | −46.5% | −27.1% | −10.9% | −42.1% | −47.6% | 0.0% | −90.8% | — |
| NVMI Nova Ltd. | 5 of 9 | −1.8% | −50.1% | −31.6% | −20.3% | −2.8% | −27.7% | −44.5% | −3.9% | −86.4% | — |
| FORM FormFactor, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −3.1% | −45.2% | −35.8% | −22.6% | −11.6% | −31.9% | −38.0% | −3.5% | −72.9% | — |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 6 of 10 | −2.9% | −48.4% | −37.9% | −24.4% | −7.5% | −22.1% | −17.7% | −2.7% | −64.1% | −90.0% |
| KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −3.1% | −41.2% | −28.8% | −28.2% | −7.2% | −18.9% | −33.3% | −6.0% | −87.0% | −95.3% |
| COHU Cohu, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −2.4% | −36.8% | −57.1% | −42.2% | −6.0% | −16.3% | −30.1% | −6.3% | −64.4% | −82.1% |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 7 of 10 | −1.0% | −54.1% | −33.5% | −13.0% | −6.7% | −19.7% | −16.2% | −0.9% | −55.2% | −82.3% |
| ENTG Entegris, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −7.8% | −45.8% | −32.7% | −19.3% | −9.2% | −28.2% | −34.8% | −6.1% | −94.5% | — |
| ACLS Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −6.5% | −41.9% | −52.0% | −23.6% | −12.3% | −34.3% | −40.7% | −7.8% | −97.1% | — |
| VECO Veeco Instruments Inc. | 1 of 10 | −3.4% | −46.5% | −53.2% | −39.2% | −14.2% | −30.2% | −42.7% | −4.0% | −81.0% | −91.9% |
| ICHR Ichor Holdings, Ltd. | 0 of 5 | −5.9% | −54.6% | −58.5% | −31.9% | −25.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ONTO Onto Innovation Inc. | 3 of 10 | −4.6% | −44.0% | −45.9% | −31.8% | −5.5% | −18.6% | −28.4% | 0.0% | −92.6% | −96.8% |
| UCTT Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −4.7% | −58.8% | −52.6% | −47.9% | −15.2% | −43.2% | −53.0% | −3.3% | −94.3% | — |
| ACMR ACM Research, Inc. | 2 of 5 | −5.9% | −73.0% | −59.6% | −20.6% | −5.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does AMAT move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares AMAT with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, AMAT captured 152% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 97% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.51. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- KLAC took just 59% of the S&P 500's losses, against 97% for AMAT, while still keeping 152% of its gains.
- Eight of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than AMAT's 1.58, led by KLAC, CAMT and TSM.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than AMAT's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAT This pageApplied Materials, Inc. | 152% | 97% | 1.58 | 1.51 |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 152% | 59% | 2.57 | 1.32 |
| CAMT Camtek Ltd. | 191% | 96% | 1.99 | 1.60 |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75% | 1.84 | 1.15 |
| MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 204% | 114% | 1.79 | 1.75 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 183% | 104% | 1.75 | 1.56 |
| FORM FormFactor, Inc. | 132% | 81% | 1.64 | 1.29 |
| NVMI Nova Ltd. | 179% | 110% | 1.62 | 1.46 |
| ONTO Onto Innovation Inc. | 139% | 92% | 1.50 | 1.41 |
| TER Teradyne, Inc. | 167% | 121% | 1.37 | 1.53 |
| ENTG Entegris, Inc. | 123% | 89% | 1.37 | 1.30 |
| ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 170% | 132% | 1.29 | 1.44 |
| KLIC Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. | 131% | 111% | 1.18 | 1.44 |
| ACLS Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | 151% | 136% | 1.10 | 1.67 |
| UCTT Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. | 165% | 156% | 1.06 | 1.93 |
| COHU Cohu, Inc. | 122% | 116% | 1.05 | 1.65 |
| INTC Intel Corp. | 98% | 100% | 0.98 | 1.43 |
| VECO Veeco Instruments Inc. | 76% | 84% | 0.90 | 1.38 |
What diversifies AMAT?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with AMAT's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing AMAT with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in AMAT into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+32.9% for AMAT alone, +32.3% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of AMAT over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.43 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- XLE made money in five of the nine calendar years in which AMAT lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which AMAT lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% AMAT and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2004 | 2002 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +215% | 0.72 | −37.5% | −34.9% | −23.5% | −21.9% | −42.1% | −2.6% | −23.8% | −35.0% | −39.7% | 49.2% | +32.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.25 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 39.9% | +31.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.43 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | 40.5% | +33.5% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.29 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.3% | +31.2% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.21 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −3.0% | −0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.1% | +30.5% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.00 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | — | — | 39.5% | +32.3% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.02 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +33.8% | −14.8% | +24.4% | 39.6% | +33.7% |
| VTV Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 0.44 | +76.6% | 0.90 | −2.1% | −5.5% | −1.0% | +1.1% | −35.9% | −0.1% | — | — | — | 40.7% | +30.3% |
| EUFN InternationaliShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 0.29 | +133% | 0.89 | −8.8% | −23.1% | −4.7% | −26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | 40.7% | +32.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2004 | 2002 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +215% | 0.72 | −37.5% | −34.9% | −23.5% | −21.9% | −42.1% | −2.6% | −23.8% | −35.0% | −39.7% | 49.2% | +32.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.35 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −4.7% | −8.3% | +108% | 41.5% | +36.0% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.34 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −6.4% | −65.1% | −2.3% | 44.7% | +49.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.05 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +61.2% | 40.0% | +36.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.03 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.1% | +39.1% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.35 | +594% | 1.36 | +24.2% | −37.5% | −36.3% | −42.9% | −67.4% | +26.4% | −14.1% | −33.1% | −15.9% | 42.3% | +38.2% |
Common questions
What was AMAT's worst drawdown?
AMAT's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 85.2%, from April 2000 to November 2008. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were AMAT's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, AMAT's best year was 1999, when it returned 197%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -42.1%.
Is there a better investment than AMAT?
Among AMAT's popular alternatives, TSM earned more than AMAT with less volatility over the past 5 years: 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 25.8% a year at 47.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, SMH (semiconductors) and ASX (semiconductors) earned more than AMAT with less volatility over the past 5 years. SMH returned 33.4% a year at 36.9% volatility, against 25.8% a year at 47.4%.
Is AMAT more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. AMAT's volatility over the past 5 years was 47.4%, 2.8 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AMAT's return lands within 47.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is AMAT's Sharpe ratio?
AMAT's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.72, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AMAT earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is AMAT with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, AMAT's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.50 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AMAT instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AMAT holding.
What are the best alternatives to AMAT?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, four outperformed AMAT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: MU, NVDA and TER.
Did AMAT outperform the S&P 500?
AMAT finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 16 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +59.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did AMAT do in stock market crashes?
AMAT fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when AMAT fell 82.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies AMAT?
These had a low correlation with AMAT over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.25), DXJ (correlation 0.43) and EMLP (correlation 0.29); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.35), CLS (correlation 0.34) and MCK (correlation 0.05). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than AMAT's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of AMAT's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to AMAT
MUMicron Technology
NVDANVIDIA
TERTeradyne
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
LRCXLam Research
KLACKLA
ASMLASML Holding
INTCIntel