Relative Intelligence · Communications Equipment

How Arista Networks (ANET) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ANET alone. It places ANET (Arista Networks, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ANET stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ANET's full trading record, from June 2014 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowNot every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise) rose 26.3% and NOK (Nokia Oyj) fell 10.2%. ANET has outpaced the market, rising 7.0% over the past 3 months against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?ANET rose 7.0% over the past 3 months, in line with the technology sector ETF XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF), which rose 5.7%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its communications equipment peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise) rose 26.3%, while NOK (Nokia Oyj) fell 10.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, ANET rose 23.7% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (289% against 89.3%). Even so, ANET led its communications equipment peers in 2023, then fell behind CSCO (Cisco Systems) and DELL (Dell Technologies) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termANET turned $10,000 into $354,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. ANET's 10-year return of 3,439% puts it ahead of 99% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashANET fell harder than the S&P 500 in three of four sell-offs. The Covid crash was the exception: ANET fell 31.2%, less than the S&P 500's 33.7%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, ANET has a correlation of 0.60 over 5 years, more closely than 91% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- NVDA (NVIDIA) earned more than ANET over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 58.0% a year at 51.9% volatility, against 49.0% a year at 49.0%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- STX (Seagate Technology, computer hardware) and WDC (Western Digital, computer hardware) earned more than ANET over the past 5 years with similar volatility: STX returned 57.4% a year at 48.7% volatility, against 49.0% a year at 49.0%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only ten of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ANET with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PBR (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras), PBR-A (Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras) and MPC (Marathon Petroleum).
How much would $10,000 in ANET have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ANET over the past 12 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ANET over the same span and ANET's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: ANET began trading on June 6, 2014, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 12 years of ANET's record, starting at the end of September 2014.
- $10,000 invested in ANET at the end of September 2014 would have grown to $368,830 by September 2026, more than the $47,240 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ANET, and NVDA finished highest, at $5,214,702.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2014 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 15 of the 2,461 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ANET; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$5M+52,047% total · +68.4% a year
- AMD$2M+17,840% total · +54.1% a year
- FIX$1M+13,154% total · +50.3% a year
- AVGO$532,141+5,221% total · +39.3% a year
- LRCX$512,501+5,025% total · +38.8% a year
- ANET$368,830+3,588% total · +35.1% a year
- MRVL$219,029+2,090% total · +29.3% a year
- CIEN$210,414+2,004% total · +28.9% a year
- AAOI$61,648+516% total · +16.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$47,240+372% total · +13.8% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 35 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ANET; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MU$153,675+1,437% total · +72.7% a year
- AAOI$138,242+1,282% total · +69.1% a year
- STX$128,799+1,188% total · +66.7% a year
- LITE$116,261+1,063% total · +63.3% a year
- DELL$112,363+1,024% total · +62.2% a year
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- WDC$107,081+971% total · +60.7% a year
- ANET$94,783+848% total · +56.8% a year
- MRVL$44,627+346% total · +34.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
ANET at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: ANET began trading on June 6, 2014, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- ANET's deepest decline since it began trading in 2014 was 52.2%, from April 2019 to March 2020. It took 14 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 11 full calendar years, ANET's best was 2017, when it returned 143%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 15.6%. It lost money in three of those years.
- ANET is 16.4% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $229B
- Industry
- Computer Hardware
- Price history from
- June 2014
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +23.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +289%+57.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +634%+49.0% a year
- Past 10 years
- +3,439%+42.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +143%2017
- Worst calendar year
- −15.6%2022
- Losing years
- 3 of 11full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 49.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.06return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −52.2%Apr 2019 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- −16.4%below the peak
ANET against the whole market
Where ANET ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ANET rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ANET on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ANET stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- ANET's 10-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ANET | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +23.7% | 1,145 of 3,287 | top 35% |
| 3-year return | +289% | 237 of 3,017 | top 8% |
| 5-year return | +634% | 47 of 2,893 | top 2% |
| 10-year return | +3,439% | 14 of 2,202 | top 1% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 49.0% | 1,884 of 2,893 | bottom 36% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.06 | 68 of 2,893 | top 2% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −52.2% | 541 of 2,187 | top 25% |
What has beaten ANET on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ANET sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ANET with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Ten stocks worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ANET over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half ANET's swings, MPC has the best return for its risk: 51.2% a year at 33.4% volatility, 32% less than ANET's 49.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.41 against 1.06 for ANET. CRS earned the most, 63.9% a year, while still swinging less than ANET (46.5% against 49.0%).
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ANET; faint dots are 6 more of the 10 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than ANET?
Investments that beat ANET over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ANET's popular alternatives, NVDA earned more than ANET over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 58.0% a year at 51.9% volatility, against 49.0% a year at 49.0%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, STX (computer hardware) and WDC (computer hardware) earned more than ANET over the past 5 years with similar volatility: STX returned 57.4% a year at 48.7% volatility, against 49.0% a year at 49.0%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only ten of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ANET with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PBR, PBR-A and MPC.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ANET over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ANET's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ANET follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ANET's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ANET's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ANET's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ANET?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +3,439% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.60 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ANET. 2 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.08 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 4 shownEverything else in Communications Equipment and the categories next to it (Semiconductors, Electronic Components, Electronics Manufacturing, Computer Hardware), plus ANET's specific themes. 4 of 68 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +2,698% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +5,243% | 0.27 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +35.7% | 57.6% | 0.82 | −65.5% | +7,583% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +53.7% | 53.5% | 1.07 | −70.5% | +911% | 0.37 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 24 of 3,545 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | -0.05 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.06 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.02 | — | ||
CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,021% | 0.06 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +51.4% | 67.0% | 0.95 | −84.6% | — | 0.11 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatility | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.50 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for ANET
- Annual return
- ANET returned 49.0% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $73,400. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ANET's volatility over the past 5 years was 49.0%, 2.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ANET's return lands within 49.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ANET's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.06, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ANET earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ANET's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 52.2%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 52.2% fall takes a 109% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ANET's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ANET instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ANET holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 10 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ANET with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with ANET | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | -0.05 | — |
| 2 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.06 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.02 | — | |
| 4 | CRSCarpenter Technology Corporation · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +63.9% | 46.5% | 1.30 | −74.7% | +1,021% | 0.06 | — |
| 5 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | -0.02 | — | |
| 6 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | 0.04 | — |
| 7 | FTITechnipFMC plc · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +54.1% | 41.3% | 1.26 | −85.8% | +178% | 0.02 | — |
| 8 | TRMDTORM plc · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +54.3% | 45.9% | 1.18 | −60.6% | — | 0.19 | — |
| 9 | TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +50.5% | 45.1% | 1.14 | −63.4% | +490% | 0.06 | — |
| 10 | LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +1,821% | 0.06 | — |
ANET against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ANET, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ANET's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ANET, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives earned more than ANET over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, ANET returned 49.0% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (49.0% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than ANET with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| AAOI Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. | +59.6% | 123% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | +57.3% | 64.5% |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | +55.2% | 54.4% |
| ANET This pageArista Networks, Inc. | +49.0% | 49.0% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | +48.3% | 44.5% |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | +45.2% | 52.6% |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | +32.9% | 42.2% |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | +31.6% | 66.3% |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | +29.5% | 65.2% |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | +17.9% | 47.9% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | +17.1% | 30.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | +16.8% | 26.1% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | +16.8% | 48.8% |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | +15.5% | 45.4% |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | +14.4% | 49.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | +11.6% | 40.1% |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | +1.7% | 35.7% |
| NTGR NETGEAR, Inc. | −7.1% | 45.8% |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | −17.3% | 56.4% |
Has ANET consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ANET with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ANET helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- DELL outperformed ANET in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Only one of the 20 popular alternatives, DELL, outperformed ANET in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- AVGO earned more for the risk it took than ANET (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ANET over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. (this page) | — | −11.8% | +7.0% | +8.6% | +35.6% | +23.7% | +289% | +634% | +3,439% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | — | $229B | — |
| DELL QualifiedDell Technologies Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −19.6% | +21.3% | +127% | +265% | +217% | +636% | +800% | +3,701% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | — | $294B | — |
| NVDA SemiconductorsNVIDIA Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| LITE Communication EquipmentLumentum Holdings Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −13.8% | +7.4% | −8.1% | +113% | +411% | +2,029% | +863% | +1,904% | 64.5% | 1.03 | −66.9% | — | $75B | — |
| AAOI Communication EquipmentApplied Optoelectronics, Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −29.4% | −25.5% | −53.1% | +93.8% | +125% | +1,011% | +936% | +270% | 123% | 0.97 | −98.5% | — | $6.5B | — |
| MRVL SemiconductorsMarvell Technology, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | −6.6% | +23.4% | +62.7% | +169% | +181% | +390% | +264% | +1,874% | 65.2% | 0.72 | −61.9% | — | $211B | — |
| CIEN Communication EquipmentCiena Corporation | 3/5 short1/3 long | −6.6% | −9.7% | −32.1% | +39.0% | +97.5% | +721% | +546% | +1,600% | 52.6% | 0.97 | −49.5% | — | $48B | — |
| VIAV Communication EquipmentViavi Solutions Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −4.1% | −11.9% | −22.2% | +91.3% | +164% | +359% | +127% | +376% | 47.9% | 0.58 | −62.9% | — | $8.5B | — |
| UI Communication EquipmentUbiquiti Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +3.2% | +13.8% | −43.9% | +7.3% | −17.3% | +434% | +95.9% | +1,194% | 49.2% | 0.52 | −72.2% | — | $37B | — |
| AVGO SemiconductorsBroadcom Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −7.8% | −11.4% | −16.0% | −3.3% | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | — | $1.6T | — |
| COHR Hardware, Equipment & PartsCoherent, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −27.9% | −18.8% | −33.3% | +19.3% | +92.8% | +648% | +295% | +795% | 66.3% | 0.75 | −72.2% | — | $46B | — |
| HPE Computer HardwareHewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 5/5 short0/3 long | −9.1% | +26.3% | +103% | +135% | +150% | +296% | +315% | +483% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | — | $74B | — |
| FFIV Software - InfrastructureF5, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +1.5% | +10.9% | +45.4% | +78.0% | +54.0% | +208% | +120% | +287% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | — | $26B | — |
| CSCO Communication EquipmentCisco Systems, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | −3.9% | −3.2% | +22.6% | +42.2% | +53.8% | +118% | +118% | +374% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $421B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| EXTR Communication EquipmentExtreme Networks, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −2.2% | −26.6% | +21.5% | +34.3% | +8.7% | +6.4% | +117% | +445% | 48.8% | 0.56 | −87.5% | — | $2.9B | — |
| META Internet Content & InformationMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −6.3% | +7.6% | +3.7% | +7.0% | −4.9% | +127% | +106% | +439% | 45.4% | 0.55 | −76.7% | — | $1.8T | — |
| ERIC Communication EquipmentTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 2/5 short0/3 long | +5.5% | +12.9% | −8.0% | +15.6% | +15.6% | +164% | +8.9% | +161% | 35.7% | 0.23 | −66.6% | — | $36B | — |
| NOK Communication EquipmentNokia Oyj | 2/5 short0/3 long | −17.5% | −10.2% | −14.3% | +40.3% | +60.8% | +211% | +72.8% | +123% | 40.1% | 0.47 | −62.6% | — | $49B | — |
| NTGR Communication EquipmentNETGEAR, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +3.2% | −1.3% | −14.5% | −5.6% | −30.0% | +109% | −30.7% | −29.3% | 45.8% | 0.06 | −78.4% | — | $623M | — |
| ADTN Communication EquipmentADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −8.7% | −43.3% | −62.7% | −24.2% | −28.3% | −8.7% | −61.3% | −59.8% | 56.4% | -0.05 | −82.0% | — | $536M | — |
How did ANET do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2015, along with where ANET ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ANET and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: ANET began trading on June 6, 2014, so the table starts with 2015, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- ANET finished ahead of the S&P 500 in nine of its 11 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last six.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ANET finished in the top quarter in four of 11 years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 11 of 21.
- Among its popular alternatives, NVDA came out ahead of ANET most often, in eight of the 11 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ANET; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ANET among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ANET | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANET This pageArista Networks, Inc. | — | +18.6% | +87.7% | +94.1% | −15.6% | +97.9% | +42.9% | −3.5% | −10.5% | +143% | +24.2% | +28.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 11 | 11 of 21 | 8 of 21 | 6 of 21 | 5 of 21 | 3 of 21 | 8 of 21 | 16 of 21 | 12 of 21 | 2 of 21 | 12 of 20 | 6 of 18 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 11 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 2 of 9 | +11.2% | +53.0% | +95.9% | −26.6% | +51.3% | +42.6% | +5.1% | +8.6% | +47.8% | — | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 8 of 11 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 3 of 10 | +339% | +60.2% | +0.5% | −50.7% | +11.6% | +19.6% | +88.8% | −14.1% | +26.5% | +75.5% | — |
| AAOI Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. | 4 of 11 | −5.4% | +90.8% | +922% | −63.2% | −39.6% | −28.4% | −23.0% | −59.2% | +61.4% | +36.6% | +52.9% |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 3 of 11 | −22.8% | +83.8% | +63.7% | −57.5% | +84.6% | +80.3% | +65.7% | −23.6% | +56.9% | +60.5% | −37.8% |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | 3 of 11 | +176% | +88.4% | −11.7% | −33.8% | +45.6% | +23.8% | +25.9% | +62.0% | −14.3% | +18.0% | +6.6% |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 4 of 11 | +76.4% | +0.3% | −4.2% | −40.4% | +17.6% | −0.1% | +49.3% | +15.0% | +6.9% | +34.3% | −21.9% |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 7 of 11 | +67.7% | +141% | −48.2% | −10.0% | +10.8% | +48.5% | +91.7% | +40.7% | +22.9% | +82.4% | +7.0% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 8 of 11 | +50.6% | +110% | +104% | −13.3% | +56.5% | +45.0% | +29.0% | +2.2% | +48.2% | +23.6% | +46.1% |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 6 of 11 | +94.8% | +118% | +24.0% | −48.6% | −10.1% | +126% | +3.7% | −30.9% | +58.4% | +59.8% | +36.0% |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 4 of 10 | +15.5% | +29.1% | +9.7% | +4.5% | +37.4% | −21.9% | +23.7% | −5.7% | +8.6% | +54.2% | — |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 2 of 11 | +1.5% | +40.5% | +24.7% | −41.3% | +39.1% | +26.0% | −13.8% | +23.5% | −9.3% | +49.3% | −25.7% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3 of 11 | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% | +13.8% | +16.6% | +31.3% | +15.1% | +0.6% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 2 of 11 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 4 of 11 | −0.5% | −5.1% | −3.7% | +16.6% | +128% | −6.5% | +20.8% | −51.3% | +149% | +23.3% | +15.6% |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 3 of 11 | +13.1% | +66.0% | +194% | −64.2% | +23.1% | +33.1% | +56.6% | −25.7% | +53.4% | +9.9% | +34.2% |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 3 of 11 | +24.0% | +33.5% | +13.2% | −44.4% | −7.2% | +38.3% | +0.1% | +35.2% | +16.7% | −36.4% | −18.1% |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 2 of 11 | +50.7% | +34.6% | −23.9% | −24.4% | +59.3% | +5.2% | −34.9% | +29.7% | −0.3% | −27.8% | −8.4% |
| NTGR NETGEAR, Inc. | 3 of 11 | −12.0% | +91.1% | −19.5% | −38.0% | −28.1% | +65.8% | −24.1% | −11.4% | +8.1% | +29.7% | +17.8% |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 2 of 11 | +4.3% | +13.5% | −59.9% | −16.3% | +57.4% | +54.4% | −5.2% | −43.2% | −12.0% | +32.4% | −19.3% |
Risk and diversification
How ANET has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ANET's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ANET's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2014, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: ANET began trading on June 6, 2014, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of ANET's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ANET fell 43.2% from September 2014 to February 2016, while the S&P 500 slipped only 3.7%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 14 months, after ANET fell 52.2% from April 2019 to March 2020.
Green means ANET fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ANET fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covid crash | −52.2% | −16.1% | Apr 2019 | Mar 2020 | 11 months | May 2021 | 14 months |
| No named crash | −50.4% | −16.4% | Jan 2025 | Apr 2025 | 3 months | Aug 2025 | 4 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −43.2% | −3.7% | Sep 2014 | Feb 2016 | 17 months | Nov 2016 | 9 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −38.8% | −17.6% | Aug 2018 | Dec 2018 | 4 months | Mar 2019 | 3 months |
| 2022 bear market | −38.4% | −22.9% | Dec 2021 | Jun 2022 | 6 months | Mar 2023 | 9 months |
How did ANET do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ANET, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: ANET began trading on June 6, 2014, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, CSCO held up best, falling less than ANET in five of the six crashes they both traded through.
- ANET began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but 13 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was ADTN's 52.3%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
- ANET fell further than the S&P 500 in three of the six crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when ANET fell 36.6% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ANET.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANET This pageArista Networks, Inc. | — | −1.5% | −36.6% | −31.2% | −31.2% | −6.1% | −36.6% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 6 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 1 of 5 | −5.7% | −43.6% | −45.9% | −28.6% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 1 of 6 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 3 of 6 | −6.5% | −36.3% | −28.7% | −40.1% | −5.0% | −34.1% | — | — | — | — |
| AAOI Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −5.7% | −71.6% | −54.5% | −58.8% | −8.1% | −45.1% | — | — | — | — |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −12.0% | −56.8% | −31.6% | −26.1% | −7.5% | −37.6% | −23.1% | 0.0% | −74.3% | — |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | 4 of 6 | −2.9% | −48.4% | −22.4% | −11.8% | −4.7% | −31.7% | −41.8% | −5.1% | −89.5% | −98.4% |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 4 of 6 | −3.0% | −27.2% | −37.5% | −26.5% | −3.0% | −27.6% | −41.5% | −4.5% | −86.0% | −98.8% |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 4 of 6 | −3.5% | −26.5% | −22.7% | −17.6% | −14.4% | −26.2% | — | — | — | — |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 4 of 6 | −2.8% | −34.3% | −46.8% | −15.2% | −4.5% | −21.6% | −26.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −10.7% | −56.3% | −43.0% | −39.5% | −9.8% | −15.0% | −40.4% | −2.1% | −68.2% | −61.4% |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 2 of 5 | −7.2% | −30.5% | −45.3% | −27.4% | −9.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −5.6% | −42.7% | −32.1% | −24.7% | −5.5% | −35.0% | −31.6% | −3.7% | −59.2% | −96.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 5 of 6 | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 4 of 6 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −4.6% | −43.9% | −71.0% | −23.0% | −26.4% | −46.8% | −30.5% | −4.8% | −75.8% | −98.0% |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −2.9% | −62.1% | −32.9% | −26.5% | −9.8% | −13.9% | — | — | — | — |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 2 of 6 | −2.3% | −53.5% | −31.3% | −13.3% | −7.5% | −19.2% | −31.9% | −0.8% | −71.4% | −98.6% |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 4 of 6 | −2.1% | −32.1% | −42.4% | −9.7% | −2.8% | −23.3% | −21.1% | 0.0% | −78.1% | −82.1% |
| NTGR NETGEAR, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −4.2% | −42.5% | −31.1% | −26.6% | −17.9% | −22.7% | −41.0% | −3.0% | −76.6% | — |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 3 of 6 | −8.6% | −28.9% | −45.4% | −43.5% | −2.5% | −13.2% | −26.6% | −0.1% | −52.3% | −81.1% |
How closely does ANET move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ANET with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, ANET captured 174% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 91% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.40. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only DELL and CIEN had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ANET's 1.92, out of 20 popular alternatives with the same record.
- DELL took just 43% of the S&P 500's losses, against 91% for ANET, while still keeping 154% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ANET's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANET This pageArista Networks, Inc. | 174% | 91% | 1.92 | 1.40 |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 154% | 43% | 3.59 | 1.13 |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | 129% | 64% | 2.02 | 1.07 |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86% | 1.85 | 1.19 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 162% | 101% | 1.61 | 1.24 |
| MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 167% | 116% | 1.44 | 1.68 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 98% | 76% | 1.30 | 0.97 |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 150% | 125% | 1.19 | 1.35 |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 116% | 102% | 1.14 | 1.31 |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 162% | 146% | 1.11 | 1.80 |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 101% | 96% | 1.06 | 0.97 |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 87% | 84% | 1.03 | 1.04 |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 134% | 143% | 0.94 | 1.25 |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 63% | 72% | 0.87 | 1.01 |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 144% | 172% | 0.84 | 1.88 |
| AAOI Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. | 169% | 221% | 0.77 | 2.83 |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 73% | 108% | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| NTGR NETGEAR, Inc. | 45% | 124% | 0.36 | 1.02 |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 47% | 150% | 0.31 | 1.46 |
What diversifies ANET?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ANET's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ANET with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ANET into MPC would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+56.8% for ANET alone, +58.0% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of ANET over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.19 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- XLE made money in two of the three calendar years in which ANET lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ANET lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ANET and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2019 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +634% | 1.06 | −15.6% | −3.5% | −10.5% | 41.4% | +56.8% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.05 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | +17.8% | −5.2% | 33.3% | +49.8% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.19 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +18.9% | −19.8% | 33.7% | +52.2% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.16 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | +23.4% | −8.7% | 33.8% | +49.4% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.11 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | +20.1% | −3.0% | 33.6% | +48.6% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.35 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | +24.9% | −9.5% | 34.0% | +48.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.02 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | +17.9% | −1.9% | 33.4% | +50.4% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.06 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | +11.7% | −18.2% | 33.3% | +52.2% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.11 | +99.4% | 0.93 | −3.7% | — | — | 33.7% | +49.6% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2019 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +634% | 1.06 | −15.6% | −3.5% | −10.5% | 41.4% | +56.8% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | -0.02 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | +18.0% | −24.5% | 33.4% | +55.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.41 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −5.7% | −16.3% | 39.4% | +69.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.02 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +26.7% | −28.4% | 33.4% | +54.7% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.06 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | +6.0% | −8.2% | 34.2% | +58.0% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.11 | +594% | 1.36 | +24.2% | +83.6% | −37.5% | 34.6% | +58.1% |
Common questions
What was ANET's worst drawdown?
ANET's deepest decline since it began trading in 2014 was 52.2%, from April 2019 to March 2020. It took 14 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because ANET launched in June 2014, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were ANET's best and worst years?
Over 11 full calendar years, ANET's best year was 2017, when it returned 143%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -15.6%.
Is there a better investment than ANET?
Among ANET's popular alternatives, NVDA earned more than ANET over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 58.0% a year at 51.9% volatility, against 49.0% a year at 49.0%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, STX (computer hardware) and WDC (computer hardware) earned more than ANET over the past 5 years with similar volatility: STX returned 57.4% a year at 48.7% volatility, against 49.0% a year at 49.0%.
Is ANET more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ANET's volatility over the past 5 years was 49.0%, 2.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ANET's return lands within 49.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ANET's Sharpe ratio?
ANET's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.06, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ANET earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ANET with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ANET's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ANET instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ANET holding.
What are the best alternatives to ANET?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed ANET in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: DELL.
Did ANET outperform the S&P 500?
ANET finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in nine of 11 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +18.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ANET do in stock market crashes?
ANET fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the six major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when ANET fell 36.6% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies ANET?
These had a low correlation with ANET over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.05), DXJ (correlation 0.19) and EMLP (correlation 0.16); among large stocks, CAH (correlation -0.02), CLS (correlation 0.41) and MCK (correlation -0.02). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ANET's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ANET's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.