Relative Intelligence · Internet Services

How Meta Platforms (META) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on META alone. It places META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where META stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: META's full trading record, from May 2012 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowIts internet services peers split over the past 6 months: MSFT (Microsoft) rose 27.7%, while NFLX (Netflix) fell 27.6%. After a 34.2% loss from February 2025 to April 2025, META has bounced 34.0% off the low. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?META held up far better than its industry: it rose 7.6% over the past 3 months while the internet services ETF XLC (State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF) fell 0.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its internet services peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SNAP rose 39.9%, while GOOG (Alphabet) fell 4.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsMETA has gone against the market, falling 4.9% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. META led its internet services peers in 2023, then fell behind GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termOver the past decade, META returned 18.4% a year against 15.5% a year for the S&P 500 (439% in total against 321%). META's 10-year return of 439% puts it ahead of 83% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 62.1% off META, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than GOOG (Alphabet, 35.0%) but less than NFLX (Netflix, 71.9%). Across four sell-offs, META has typically fallen 1.5 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationMETA is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.43 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.42 with the total US market, more closely than 59% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, META's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.25: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.3 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.4 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- AAPL (Apple) and GOOG (Alphabet) earned more than META with less volatility over the past 5 years. AAPL returned 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against 15.5% a year at 45.4%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- FFIV (F5, cybersecurity) and MSGS (Madison Square Garden Sports, entertainment) earned more than META with less volatility over the past 5 years. FFIV returned 17.1% a year at 30.8% volatility, against 15.5% a year at 45.4%.
- Whole market
- 379 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than META with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing).
How much would $10,000 in META have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in META over the past 14 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of META over the same span and META's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: META began trading on May 18, 2012, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 14 years of META's record, starting at the end of September 2012.
- $10,000 invested in META at the end of September 2012 would have grown to $338,073 by September 2026, more than the $67,346 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of META, and NVDA finished highest, at $7,517,992.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2012 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 37 of the 2,213 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of META; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$8M+75,080% total · +60.5% a year
- NFLX$894,675+8,847% total · +37.8% a year
- SMH$453,446+4,434% total · +31.3% a year
- PANW$387,235+3,772% total · +29.8% a year
- FTNT$370,856+3,609% total · +29.4% a year
- META$338,073+3,281% total · +28.6% a year
- MSFT$217,246+2,072% total · +24.6% a year
- GOOG$183,095+1,731% total · +23.1% a year
- AAPL$166,180+1,562% total · +22.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$67,346+573% total · +14.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 679 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of META; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- ANET$94,783+848% total · +56.8% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- AAPL$24,129+141% total · +19.3% a year
- FFIV$22,395+124% total · +17.5% a year
- SPOT$21,629+116% total · +16.7% a year
- META$21,571+116% total · +16.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
META at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: META began trading on May 18, 2012, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- META's deepest decline since it began trading in 2012 was 76.7%, from September 2021 to November 2022. It took 14 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 13 full calendar years, META's best was 2023, when it returned 194%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 64.2%. It lost money in two of those years.
- META is 11.8% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $1.8T
- Industry
- Internet Content & Information
- Price history from
- May 2012
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −4.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +127%+31.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- +106%+15.5% a year
- Past 10 years
- +439%+18.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +194%2023
- Worst calendar year
- −64.2%2022
- Losing years
- 2 of 13full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 45.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.55return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −76.7%Sep 2021 to Nov 2022
- From its all-time high
- −11.8%below the peak
META against the whole market
Where META ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does META rank among all stocks?
This section ranks META on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how META stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- META's 10-year return ranks in the top 17% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | META | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −4.9% | 2,178 of 3,287 | bottom 35% |
| 3-year return | +127% | 725 of 3,017 | top 24% |
| 5-year return | +106% | 651 of 2,893 | top 23% |
| 10-year return | +439% | 365 of 2,202 | top 17% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 45.4% | 1,714 of 2,893 | bottom 42% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.55 | 820 of 2,893 | top 28% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −76.7% | 1,517 of 2,187 | bottom 32% |
What has beaten META on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). META sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than META with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 311 stocks and 68 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than META over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 10% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half META's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 45% less than META's 45.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.55 for META. ATI earned the most, 61.8% a year, while still swinging less than META (42.9% against 45.4%).
- Among META's popular alternatives, AAPL and GOOG are in the region. AAPL earned 18.5% a year against 15.5% a year for META, at 28.0% volatility, 38% less than META's 45.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to META; faint dots are 89 more of the 379 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than META?
Investments that beat META over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among META's popular alternatives, AAPL and GOOG earned more than META with less volatility over the past 5 years. AAPL returned 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against 15.5% a year at 45.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, FFIV (cybersecurity) and MSGS (entertainment) earned more than META with less volatility over the past 5 years. FFIV returned 17.1% a year at 30.8% volatility, against 15.5% a year at 45.4%.
- Across the whole market, 379 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than META with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and TSM.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat META over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks META's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than META follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than META's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× META's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than META's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with META?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +15.5% | 45.4% | 0.55 | −76.7% | +439% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.43 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 4 shownThe investments people most often weigh against META. 4 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.21 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +3,439% | 0.32 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.50 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Internet Services and the categories next to it (Entertainment, E-Commerce, Software, Application Software), plus META's specific themes. 11 of 107 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | 0.40 | — | |
MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.09 | — | |
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF · Technology Equity · Digital Advertising theme | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.1% | 26.5% | 0.76 | −40.7% | +720% | 0.53 | 0.37% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +2,626% | 0.09 | — | ||
TKOTKO Group Holdings, Inc. · Entertainment | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.3% | 32.7% | 0.88 | −69.1% | +941% | 0.02 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 652 of 3,507 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.02 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.19 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.14 | — | ||
BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | 0.00 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.50 | 0.35% | ||
SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.31 | 0.13% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +57.4% | 48.7% | 1.18 | −57.0% | +2,698% | 0.35 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.22 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for META
- Annual return
- META returned 15.5% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $20,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- META's volatility over the past 5 years was 45.4%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, META's return lands within 45.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- META's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.55, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so META earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- META's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 76.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 76.7% fall takes a 330% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, META's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.43 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against META instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a META holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 379 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than META with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with META | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.02 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +19.4% | 26.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | +767% | 0.45 | 0.08% | |
| 3 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.19 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.14 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | -0.04 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.59 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.01 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.20 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.03 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.25 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.07 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.21 | — | |
| 13 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.13 | — |
| 14 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.34 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.20 | — | |
| 16 | BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | 0.00 | — |
| 17 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.32 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.22 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | -0.04 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.26 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.38 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.29 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | -0.05 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.01 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.22 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.20 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +190% | 0.10 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | -0.12 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.27 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +352% | 0.05 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.32 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.12 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.32 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.50 | 0.35% | |
| 35 | Whole market | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.21 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +426% | 0.25 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.14 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +510% | 0.07 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | -0.29 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +24.3% | 39.1% | 0.75 | −63.3% | +1,270% | 0.21 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +18.9% | 37.3% | 0.65 | −53.9% | +194% | 0.01 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +21.7% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −57.2% | +569% | 0.07 | — | |
| 43 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.11 | — |
| 44 | Whole market | +25.3% | 34.4% | 0.83 | −64.1% | +390% | 0.24 | — | |
| 45 | STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +32.2% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | +1,018% | -0.03 | — |
| 46 | NWGNatWest Group plc · Banks | Whole market | +27.7% | 34.1% | 0.89 | −67.4% | +495% | 0.17 | — |
| 47 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.05 | — |
| 48 | Whole market | +17.3% | 27.8% | 0.71 | −57.7% | +809% | 0.10 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.26 | — | |
| 50 | SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP · Water Utilities | Whole market | +39.1% | 37.1% | 1.08 | −62.0% | +293% | -0.06 | — |
| 51 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.15 | — |
| 52 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.29 | — |
| 53 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.31 | 0.13% |
| 54 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.11 | — |
| 55 | GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF · Gold Mining | Whole market | +22.9% | 38.2% | 0.73 | −49.8% | +283% | 0.06 | 0.51% |
| 56 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | -0.01 | — |
| 57 | NMRNomura Holdings, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +17.1% | 29.9% | 0.68 | −54.0% | +179% | 0.27 | — |
| 58 | WFWoori Financial Group Inc. · Banks | Whole market | +26.3% | 31.6% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +282% | 0.30 | — |
| 59 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.00 | — |
| 60 | Popular alternative | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.21 | — | |
| 61 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Whole market | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.18 | — |
| 62 | SNXTD Synnex Corp · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +20.3% | 30.4% | 0.76 | −55.8% | +430% | 0.28 | — |
| 63 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | 0.05 | — |
| 64 | EXELExelixis, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +24.4% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | +448% | 0.00 | — |
| 65 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +1,196% | 0.02 | — |
| 66 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | -0.01 | — | |
| 67 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.47 | 0.59% |
| 68 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | -0.09 | — |
| 69 | PAGPenske Automotive Group, Inc. · Specialty Retail | Whole market | +18.3% | 31.9% | 0.69 | −60.0% | +528% | 0.16 | — |
| 70 | CACICACI International Inc · Business Services | Whole market | +16.6% | 29.9% | 0.66 | −42.9% | +499% | -0.07 | — |
| 71 | LAURLaureate Education, Inc. · Education Services | Whole market | +37.5% | 32.8% | 1.14 | −64.5% | — | 0.01 | — |
| 72 | BPOPPopular, Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +17.7% | 29.7% | 0.70 | −59.0% | +448% | 0.12 | — |
| 73 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | 0.08 | — |
| 74 | TFPMTriple Flag Precious Metals Corp. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +29.3% | 37.7% | 0.87 | −36.2% | — | 0.00 | — |
| 75 | MATXMatson, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +24.9% | 39.4% | 0.76 | −53.6% | +594% | 0.08 | — |
| 76 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.07 | — |
| 77 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.47 | 0.19% |
| 78 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.42 | 0.40% |
| 79 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.40 | 0.40% |
| 80 | GFFGriffon Corporation · Building Products | Whole market | +36.4% | 41.7% | 0.95 | −61.3% | +761% | 0.12 | — |
| 81 | IFSIntercorp Financial Services Inc. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +20.8% | 31.1% | 0.77 | −56.9% | — | 0.00 | — |
| 82 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +1,050% | -0.07 | — |
| 83 | PSMTPriceSmart, Inc. · Discount Retail | Whole market | +18.6% | 28.2% | 0.75 | −53.2% | +124% | 0.18 | — |
| 84 | CNOCNO Financial Group, Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +18.8% | 28.1% | 0.76 | −63.8% | +342% | -0.01 | — |
| 85 | VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +20.8% | 33.8% | 0.73 | −56.2% | +545% | -0.05 | — |
| 86 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Same or nearby category | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | 0.40 | — |
| 87 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.5% | 22.5% | 0.83 | −31.4% | — | 0.47 | 0.15% |
| 88 | FBPFirst BanCorp. · Regional Banks | Whole market | +19.1% | 31.5% | 0.71 | −67.8% | +561% | 0.03 | — |
| 89 | OPLNOPENLANE, Inc. · Auto Auctions | Whole market | +19.9% | 39.6% | 0.65 | −64.5% | +153% | -0.05 | — |
| 90 | FRDMFreedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF · International | Whole market | +17.3% | 22.8% | 0.82 | −40.5% | — | 0.37 | 0.49% |
| 91 | SOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Whole market | +28.3% | 38.9% | 0.84 | −46.0% | — | 0.44 | 0.19% |
| 92 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Same or nearby category | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.09 | — |
| 93 | NICNicolet Bankshares, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 30.1% | 0.73 | −44.3% | +344% | 0.05 | — |
| 94 | DCODucommun Incorporated · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +27.5% | 34.5% | 0.88 | −70.8% | +706% | 0.04 | — |
| 95 | DGIIDigi International Inc. · Communication Equipment | Whole market | +28.0% | 42.4% | 0.79 | −65.7% | +587% | 0.07 | — |
| 96 | BHEBenchmark Electronics, Inc. · Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Whole market | +24.9% | 37.3% | 0.78 | −60.3% | +243% | 0.10 | — |
| 97 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +929% | -0.02 | — |
| 98 | RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · International | Whole market | +24.7% | 38.2% | 0.77 | −52.0% | +315% | 0.08 | 0.39% |
| 99 | OFGOFG Bancorp · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.5% | 28.7% | 0.77 | −61.2% | +580% | 0.05 | — |
| 100 | AKO-AEmbotelladora Andina S.A. · Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Whole market | +28.4% | 42.8% | 0.80 | −63.5% | +119% | 0.27 | — |
See everything that outperformed META →
META against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against META, compared period by period and year by year.
How do META's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at META, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only GOOG and AAPL were both more rewarding and calmer than META over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, META returned 15.5% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (45.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than META with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | +49.0% | 49.0% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | +18.4% | 28.0% |
| SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | +15.9% | 47.8% |
| META This pageMeta Platforms, Inc. | +15.5% | 45.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | +1.9% | 43.8% |
| TME Tencent Music Entertainment Group | +1.0% | 58.7% |
| RBLX Roblox Corporation | −7.8% | 71.1% |
| YELP Yelp Inc. | −12.4% | 37.6% |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | −15.0% | 51.9% |
| PINS Pinterest, Inc. | −18.2% | 55.6% |
| MTCH Match Group, Inc. | −21.1% | 44.0% |
| U Unity Software Inc. | −22.4% | 77.5% |
| WB Weibo Corporation | −29.1% | 50.2% |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | −29.9% | 77.4% |
| TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | −30.8% | 67.7% |
| SNAP Snap Inc. | −39.0% | 76.2% |
Has META consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares META with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than META helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Three of the 20 popular alternatives, NVDA, ANET and AAPL, outperformed META in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- NVDA outperformed META in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- NVDA, ANET and AAPL earned more for the risk they took than META (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than META over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. (this page) | — | −6.3% | +7.6% | +3.7% | +7.0% | −4.9% | +127% | +106% | +439% | 45.4% | 0.55 | −76.7% | — | $1.8T | — |
| NVDA QualifiedNVIDIA Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| ANET QualifiedArista Networks, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −11.8% | +7.0% | +8.6% | +35.6% | +23.7% | +289% | +634% | +3,439% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | — | $229B | — |
| AAPL QualifiedApple Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +0.2% | +4.0% | +24.6% | +25.6% | +29.9% | +99.0% | +133% | +1,168% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | — | $5.0T | — |
| GOOG Internet Content & InformationAlphabet Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | +752% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| SPOT Internet Content & InformationSpotify Technology S.A. | 1/5 short2/3 long | +1.8% | +6.9% | −2.0% | −8.5% | −22.1% | +251% | +109% | — | 47.8% | 0.55 | −80.5% | — | $108B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 5/5 short1/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| NFLX EntertainmentNetflix, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −6.4% | +1.6% | −27.6% | −24.5% | −44.5% | +71.3% | +9.9% | +457% | 43.8% | 0.27 | −75.9% | — | $286B | — |
| MTCH Internet Content & InformationMatch Group, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +8.3% | +19.8% | +30.2% | +49.9% | +44.3% | +37.1% | −69.4% | +166% | 44.0% | -0.32 | −84.4% | — | $11B | — |
| SNAP Internet Content & InformationSnap Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +11.9% | +39.9% | +6.3% | −21.5% | −17.5% | −32.4% | −91.6% | — | 76.2% | -0.26 | −95.3% | — | $11B | — |
| U Software - ApplicationUnity Software Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −7.1% | +34.7% | +51.4% | −9.2% | +13.9% | +47.8% | −71.8% | — | 77.5% | 0.06 | −93.1% | — | $18B | — |
| PINS Internet Content & InformationPinterest, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +18.7% | +0.7% | +11.3% | −13.5% | −30.2% | −11.5% | −63.3% | — | 55.6% | -0.08 | −82.7% | — | $13B | — |
| YELP Internet Content & InformationYelp Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +4.5% | −23.0% | −28.0% | −32.8% | −38.3% | −51.9% | −48.5% | −41.0% | 37.6% | -0.17 | −72.2% | — | $1.1B | — |
| WB Internet Content & InformationWeibo Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.0% | −18.3% | −25.5% | −33.7% | −38.4% | −25.4% | −82.0% | −82.5% | 50.2% | -0.44 | −94.0% | — | $1.6B | — |
| RBLX Electronic Gaming & MultimediaRoblox Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.1% | −1.7% | −15.3% | −35.3% | −61.2% | +64.8% | −33.4% | — | 71.1% | 0.24 | −82.8% | — | $37B | — |
| RDDT Internet Content & InformationReddit, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.9% | −14.3% | −6.3% | −35.6% | −23.1% | — | — | — | — | — | −61.4% | — | $30B | — |
| TME Internet Content & InformationTencent Music Entertainment Group | 1/5 short0/3 long | +4.9% | −6.5% | −15.2% | −50.8% | −61.3% | +35.2% | +4.9% | — | 58.7% | 0.30 | −90.2% | — | $13B | — |
| TTD Advertising AgenciesThe Trade Desk, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.9% | −32.1% | −47.4% | −66.4% | −75.9% | −82.9% | −84.1% | +377% | 67.7% | -0.20 | −91.5% | — | $6.0B | — |
| BIDU Internet Content & InformationBaidu, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.7% | −26.7% | −37.0% | −46.4% | −34.1% | −24.4% | −55.5% | −54.0% | 51.9% | -0.06 | −77.5% | — | $27B | — |
| BILI Internet Content & InformationBilibili Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.3% | −24.4% | −44.3% | −47.2% | −49.5% | +11.3% | −83.1% | — | 77.4% | -0.09 | −94.3% | — | $5.9B | — |
How did META do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2013, along with where META ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with META and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: META began trading on May 18, 2012, so the table starts with 2013, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, META finished in the top quarter in four of 13 years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 13 of 21.
- META finished ahead of the S&P 500 in eight of its 13 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, NVDA came out ahead of META most often, in ten of the 13 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of META; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places META among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of META | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META This pageMeta Platforms, Inc. | — | +13.1% | +66.0% | +194% | −64.2% | +23.1% | +33.1% | +56.6% | −25.7% | +53.4% | +9.9% | +34.2% | +42.8% | +105% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 13 | 13 of 21 | 5 of 20 | 2 of 20 | 15 of 20 | 6 of 19 | 15 of 18 | 7 of 17 | 10 of 14 | 8 of 13 | 9 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 1 of 10 | 3 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 13 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10 of 13 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 8 of 11 | +18.6% | +87.7% | +94.1% | −15.6% | +97.9% | +42.9% | −3.5% | −10.5% | +143% | +24.2% | +28.2% | — | — |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 6 of 13 | +9.0% | +30.7% | +49.0% | −26.4% | +34.6% | +82.3% | +89.0% | −5.4% | +48.5% | +12.5% | −3.0% | +40.6% | +8.0% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 5 of 13 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% | +29.1% | −1.0% | +35.6% | +1.7% | +44.5% | −6.0% | +58.5% |
| SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | 3 of 7 | +29.8% | +138% | +138% | −66.3% | −25.6% | +110% | +31.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 6 of 13 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 6 of 13 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 7 of 13 | +5.2% | +83.0% | +65.1% | −51.0% | +11.4% | +67.1% | +20.9% | +39.4% | +55.1% | +8.2% | +134% | −7.2% | +298% |
| MTCH Match Group, Inc. | 5 of 13 | +1.0% | −10.4% | −12.0% | −68.6% | −12.5% | +84.1% | +92.0% | +43.5% | +83.1% | +26.2% | −22.0% | −11.4% | +45.2% |
| SNAP Snap Inc. | 2 of 8 | −25.1% | −36.4% | +89.2% | −81.0% | −6.1% | +207% | +196% | −62.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| U Unity Software Inc. | 1 of 5 | +96.6% | −45.1% | +43.0% | −80.0% | −6.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PINS Pinterest, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −10.7% | −21.7% | +52.5% | −33.2% | −44.8% | +254% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| YELP Yelp Inc. | 4 of 13 | −21.5% | −18.3% | +73.2% | −24.6% | +10.9% | −6.2% | −0.5% | −16.6% | +10.0% | +32.4% | −47.4% | −20.6% | +266% |
| WB Weibo Corporation | 5 of 11 | +19.5% | −4.0% | −39.1% | −38.3% | −24.4% | −11.6% | −20.7% | −43.5% | +155% | +108% | +36.9% | — | — |
| RBLX Roblox Corporation | 1 of 4 | +40.0% | +26.6% | +60.6% | −72.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RDDT Reddit, Inc. | 1 of 1 | +40.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TME Tencent Music Entertainment Group | 3 of 7 | +56.4% | +27.2% | +8.7% | +21.0% | −64.4% | +63.8% | −11.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −67.7% | +63.3% | +60.5% | −51.1% | +14.4% | +208% | +124% | +154% | +65.0% | — | — | — | — |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | 3 of 13 | +55.0% | −29.2% | +4.1% | −23.1% | −31.2% | +71.1% | −20.3% | −32.3% | +42.4% | −13.0% | −17.1% | +28.2% | +77.4% |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 3 of 7 | +35.8% | +48.8% | −48.6% | −48.9% | −45.9% | +360% | +27.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How META has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were META's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents META's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2012, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: META began trading on May 18, 2012, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of META's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: META fell 53.6% from May to September 2012, while the S&P 500 rose 9.3%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 14 months, after META fell 76.7% from September 2021 to November 2022.
Green means META fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | META fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −76.7% | −16.3% | Sep 2021 | Nov 2022 | 14 months | Jan 2024 | 14 months |
| No named crash | −53.6% | +9.3% | May 2012 | Sep 2012 | 4 months | Aug 2013 | 11 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −43.0% | −16.6% | Jul 2018 | Dec 2018 | 5 months | Jan 2020 | 13 months |
| Covid crash | −34.6% | −26.6% | Jan 2020 | Mar 2020 | 2 months | May 2020 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −34.2% | −15.5% | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 | 2 months | Jun 2025 | 2 months |
How did META do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far META, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: META began trading on May 18, 2012, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- META fell further than the S&P 500 in four of the six crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when META fell 62.1% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, TME held up best, falling less than META in all three crashes they both traded through.
- META began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but eight of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was MTCH's 51.6%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than META.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META This pageMeta Platforms, Inc. | — | −2.9% | −62.1% | −32.9% | −26.5% | −9.8% | −13.9% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 6 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 2 of 6 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −1.5% | −36.6% | −31.2% | −31.2% | −6.1% | −36.6% | — | — | — | — |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 3 of 6 | −2.9% | −27.4% | −30.7% | −36.5% | −4.8% | −23.4% | −12.5% | −4.3% | −60.9% | −81.2% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 4 of 6 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | 1 of 4 | −4.2% | −65.7% | −20.6% | −42.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 5 of 6 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −6.1% | −71.9% | −22.6% | −38.7% | −6.7% | −36.8% | −59.7% | −6.5% | −55.9% | — |
| MTCH Match Group, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −8.6% | −65.1% | −37.6% | −38.9% | −6.8% | −57.7% | −18.8% | −2.4% | −51.6% | −51.4% |
| SNAP Snap Inc. | 0 of 5 | −7.4% | −78.3% | −51.3% | −45.4% | −9.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| U Unity Software Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.6% | −76.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PINS Pinterest, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −8.0% | −50.1% | −53.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| YELP Yelp Inc. | 1 of 6 | −4.9% | −27.3% | −58.3% | −39.1% | −14.8% | −51.5% | — | — | — | — |
| WB Weibo Corporation | 3 of 6 | −5.3% | −60.7% | −30.6% | −29.7% | −8.0% | −39.7% | — | — | — | — |
| RBLX Roblox Corporation | 0 of 2 | −3.4% | −75.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TME Tencent Music Entertainment Group | 3 of 3 | −2.3% | −57.4% | −26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | 2 of 5 | −8.4% | −51.7% | −54.2% | −33.0% | −8.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −7.5% | −36.6% | −38.4% | −31.8% | −9.0% | −35.5% | −36.0% | −4.3% | −74.9% | — |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 2 of 4 | −8.0% | −70.2% | −28.2% | −17.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does META move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares META with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Seven of the 12 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than META's 0.94, led by ANET, NVDA and AAPL.
- ANET took just 91% of the S&P 500's losses, against 143% for META, while still keeping 174% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, META captured 134% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 143% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.25. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than META's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META This pageMeta Platforms, Inc. | 134% | 143% | 0.94 | 1.25 |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 174% | 91% | 1.92 | 1.40 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 137% | 94% | 1.46 | 1.15 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 132% | 110% | 1.20 | 1.12 |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 122% | 105% | 1.16 | 1.18 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | 140% | 173% | 0.81 | 1.75 |
| MTCH Match Group, Inc. | 98% | 131% | 0.75 | 0.98 |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | 56% | 159% | 0.35 | 0.79 |
| YELP Yelp Inc. | 52% | 156% | 0.33 | 1.14 |
| WB Weibo Corporation | 15% | 144% | 0.10 | 0.63 |
What diversifies META?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with META's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing META with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in META into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 22% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+16.6% for META alone, +22.9% for the mix).
- FIX made money in two of the two calendar years in which META lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of META over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.30 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which META lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% META and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +106% | 0.55 | −64.2% | −25.7% | 42.8% | +16.6% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.24 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | 34.7% | +18.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.30 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | 35.1% | +20.3% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.06 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −8.7% | 34.5% | +18.3% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.02 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −3.0% | 34.4% | +17.7% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.39 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | −9.5% | 35.1% | +17.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.08 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | 34.7% | +18.9% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.31 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | −0.9% | 35.7% | +19.3% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.17 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | 33.7% | +20.7% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +106% | 0.55 | −64.2% | −25.7% | 42.8% | +16.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | -0.04 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | 34.4% | +23.2% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.30 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | 39.3% | +35.2% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.17 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | 36.8% | +31.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.21 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | 33.5% | +22.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | -0.01 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | 34.8% | +25.4% |
Common questions
What was META's worst drawdown?
META's deepest decline since it began trading in 2012 was 76.7%, from September 2021 to November 2022. It took 14 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because META launched in May 2012, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were META's best and worst years?
Over 13 full calendar years, META's best year was 2023, when it returned 194%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -64.2%.
Is there a better investment than META?
Among META's popular alternatives, AAPL and GOOG earned more than META with less volatility over the past 5 years. AAPL returned 18.5% a year at 28.0% volatility, against 15.5% a year at 45.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, FFIV (cybersecurity) and MSGS (entertainment) earned more than META with less volatility over the past 5 years. FFIV returned 17.1% a year at 30.8% volatility, against 15.5% a year at 45.4%.
Is META more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. META's volatility over the past 5 years was 45.4%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, META's return lands within 45.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is META's Sharpe ratio?
META's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.55, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so META earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is META with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, META's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.43 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against META instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a META holding.
What are the best alternatives to META?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed META in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: NVDA, ANET and AAPL.
Did META outperform the S&P 500?
META finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in eight of 13 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +13.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did META do in stock market crashes?
META fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the six major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when META fell 62.1% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies META?
These had a low correlation with META over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.24), DXJ (correlation 0.30) and EMLP (correlation 0.06); among large stocks, CAH (correlation -0.04), CLS (correlation 0.30) and FIX (correlation 0.17). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than META's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of META's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to META
NVDANVIDIA
ANETArista Networks
AAPLApple
GOOGAlphabet
SPOTSpotify Technology
MSFTMicrosoft
AMZNAmazon.com
NFLXNetflix
RBLXRoblox