Relative Intelligence · Tobacco

How British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on BTI alone. It places BTI (British American Tobacco p.l.c.) against 9 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where BTI stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: BTI's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowBTI has gone against the market, falling 3.9% over the past 3 months while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its tobacco peers split over the past 3 months: PM (Philip Morris International) rose 4.6%, while UVV (Universal) fell 24.1%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is BTI's own: it fell 3.9% over the past 3 months while the tobacco ETF KXI (iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF) rose 3.0%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its tobacco peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: PM (Philip Morris International) rose 4.6%, while UVV (Universal) fell 24.1%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsThe past 3 years (ahead of 80% of the stocks worth at least $300 million) have been far stronger than the record over 10 years (behind 61% of them). Over the past year, BTI rose 22.5% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (148% against 89.3%). Market rank ↓
- Long termBTI turned $10,000 into $19,800 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: BTI rose 136% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, BTI held up better than its tobacco peers, including PM (Philip Morris International), MO and TPB. On the flip side, BTI fell further than the S&P 500 in three of the last four sell-offs, including the late-2018 sell-off (33.0% against 19.3%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationBTI is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.20 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.21 with the total US market, less closely than 86% of stocks worth at least $300 million. That said, over 10 years, BTI's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.55: 51% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 67% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- CCEP (Coca-Cola Europacific Partners, food & beverages) and KOF (Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., food & beverages) were ahead of BTI in most short and long periods.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BTI with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) and SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund).
How much would $10,000 in BTI have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in BTI over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of BTI over the same span and BTI's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in BTI at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $388,024 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of BTI, and AAPL finished highest, at $20,534,853.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 144 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BTI; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- MU$629,766+6,198% total · +15.4% a year
- MSFT$508,386+4,984% total · +14.5% a year
- LLY$396,376+3,864% total · +13.5% a year
- BTI$388,024+3,780% total · +13.4% a year
- MO$372,045+3,620% total · +13.3% a year
- STZ$228,856+2,189% total · +11.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- DEO$61,057+511% total · +6.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 654 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BTI; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- DXJ$32,976+230% total · +27.0% a year
- MPLX$30,642+206% total · +25.1% a year
- ABBV$29,134+191% total · +23.8% a year
- PM$25,119+151% total · +20.2% a year
- KOF$23,968+140% total · +19.1% a year
- BTI$22,055+121% total · +17.1% a year
- MO$21,729+117% total · +16.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- XLP$13,362+33.6% total · +6.0% a year
- TPB$12,750+27.5% total · +5.0% a year
BTI at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- BTI's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 60.8%, from January 1999 to March 2000. It took 17 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, BTI's best was 2000, when it returned 70.2%, and its worst was 2018, when it lost 49.5%. It lost money in five of those years.
- BTI is 8.7% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $128B
- Industry
- Tobacco
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +22.5%total return
- Past 3 years
- +148%+35.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +136%+18.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +98.2%+7.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +70.2%2000
- Worst calendar year
- −49.5%2018
- Losing years
- 5 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 22.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.90return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −60.8%Jan 1999 to Mar 2000
- From its all-time high
- −8.7%below the peak
BTI against the whole market
Where BTI ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does BTI rank among all stocks?
This section ranks BTI on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how BTI stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- BTI is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 5% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | BTI | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +22.5% | 1,169 of 3,287 | top 36% |
| 3-year return | +148% | 616 of 3,017 | top 20% |
| 5-year return | +136% | 502 of 2,893 | top 17% |
| 10-year return | +98.2% | 1,346 of 2,202 | bottom 40% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 22.0% | 148 of 2,893 | top 5% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.90 | 174 of 2,893 | top 6% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −56.1% | 719 of 2,187 | top 33% |
What has beaten BTI on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). BTI sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than BTI with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- One stock and four ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than BTI over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half BTI's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 13% less than BTI's 22.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.90 for BTI.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to BTI; faint dots are 1 more of the 5 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than BTI?
Investments that beat BTI over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among BTI's popular alternatives, PM was ahead of BTI in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CCEP (food & beverages) and KOF (food & beverages) were ahead of BTI in most short and long periods.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BTI with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ and SDCI.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat BTI over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks BTI's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than BTI follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than BTI's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× BTI's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than BTI's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with BTI?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.20 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against BTI. 2 of 9 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.56 | — | ||
XLPState Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF · Consumer Staples | Smaller losses in recent crashes | +7.2% | 13.8% | 0.57 | −24.5% | +121% | 0.48 | 0.08% | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 3 shownEverything else in Tobacco and the categories next to it (Alcoholic Beverages, Food & Beverages), plus BTI's specific themes. 3 of 26 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.34 | — | ||
KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Higher return in most periods | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.10 | — | |
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +2.5% | 22.1% | 0.23 | −36.9% | +281% | 0.24 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 166 of 3,598 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.22 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.25 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.41 | — | ||
DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.10 | 0.45% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.46 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.02 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.21 | — | |
What these numbers mean for BTI
- Annual return
- BTI returned 18.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $23,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- BTI's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.0%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BTI's return lands within 22.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- BTI's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.90, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BTI earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- BTI's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 56.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 56.1% fall takes a 128% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, BTI's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.20 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BTI instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BTI holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 5 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than BTI with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 4 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with BTI | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.22 | 0.48% |
| 2 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.41 | — | |
| 3 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.10 | 0.45% |
| 4 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.28 | 0.80% |
BTI against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against BTI, compared period by period and year by year.
How do BTI's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at BTI, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the nine popular alternatives earned more than BTI over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Six of the nine popular alternatives earned less than BTI over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, BTI returned 18.7% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (22.0% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than BTI with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| PM Philip Morris International Inc. | +21.0% | 23.4% |
| BTI This pageBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. | +18.7% | 22.0% |
| MO Altria Group, Inc. | +17.8% | 21.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | +9.7% | 25.0% |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | +7.4% | 43.1% |
| XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | +7.2% | 13.8% |
| UVV Universal Corporation | +2.0% | 24.8% |
| TAP Molson Coors Beverage Company | +0.9% | 26.0% |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | −7.8% | 25.4% |
| DEO Diageo plc | −11.9% | 25.6% |
Has BTI consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares BTI with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than BTI helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the nine popular alternatives, PM, outperformed BTI in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- PM earned more for the risk it took than BTI (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than BTI over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. (this page) | — | +7.7% | −3.9% | +6.7% | +9.2% | +22.5% | +148% | +136% | +98.2% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | — | $128B | — |
| PM QualifiedPhilip Morris International Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +7.5% | +4.6% | +29.0% | +27.9% | +30.9% | +144% | +159% | +242% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | — | $312B | — |
| TPB TobaccoTurning Point Brands, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | +5.1% | −20.0% | −23.6% | −41.4% | −26.2% | +206% | +43.2% | +441% | 43.1% | 0.39 | −72.8% | — | $1.3B | — |
| MO TobaccoAltria Group, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +8.9% | +1.6% | +19.1% | +36.6% | +23.7% | +118% | +126% | +140% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | — | $125B | — |
| XLP Consumer StaplesState Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3/5 short1/3 long | +7.1% | +4.1% | +7.9% | +15.1% | +13.2% | +41.5% | +41.4% | +121% | 13.8% | 0.57 | −24.5% | 0.08% | $15B | — |
| DEO Beverages - AlcoholicDiageo plc | 4/5 short0/3 long | +9.0% | +11.5% | +15.2% | +9.7% | −2.4% | −32.5% | −46.8% | +11.7% | 25.6% | -0.37 | −63.4% | — | $52B | — |
| BUD Beverages - AlcoholicAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 4/5 short0/3 long | +6.9% | +3.1% | +12.3% | +32.7% | +36.7% | +66.6% | +58.7% | −20.0% | 25.0% | 0.50 | −69.8% | — | $166B | — |
| STZ Beverages - AlcoholicConstellation Brands, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +12.1% | −0.4% | −15.7% | −4.0% | −3.3% | −38.5% | −33.2% | −6.6% | 25.4% | -0.19 | −56.0% | — | $22B | — |
| TAP Beverages - AlcoholicMolson Coors Beverage Company | 1/5 short0/3 long | +7.0% | −2.3% | −7.1% | −12.3% | −9.9% | −23.7% | +4.6% | −51.6% | 26.0% | 0.17 | −67.0% | — | $7.5B | — |
| UVV TobaccoUniversal Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −6.7% | −24.1% | −20.5% | −19.4% | −20.6% | +4.0% | +10.5% | +25.6% | 24.8% | 0.21 | −45.7% | — | $987M | — |
How did BTI do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where BTI ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with BTI and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, BTI finished in the top quarter in 13 of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 2 of 10.
- BTI finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 18 of its 29 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, TPB came out ahead of BTI most often, in six of the nine years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of BTI; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places BTI among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of BTI | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTI This pageBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. | — | +66.4% | +35.5% | −19.9% | +14.2% | +7.8% | −4.7% | +42.8% | −49.5% | +24.5% | +5.8% | +6.8% | +4.9% | +10.5% | +11.3% | +27.9% | +26.0% | +28.4% | −30.0% | +44.1% | +30.3% | +35.7% | +31.2% | +49.6% | +22.2% | +13.9% | +70.2% | −38.0% | +26.9% | +22.9% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 13 of 29 | 2 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 10 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 10 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 5 of 9 | 8 of 9 | 6 of 9 | 8 of 9 | 6 of 9 | 2 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 3 of 8 | 3 of 7 | 1 of 7 | 2 of 7 | 1 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 1 of 7 | 1 of 7 | 2 of 7 | 2 of 7 | 6 of 7 | 2 of 6 | 6 of 6 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 8 of 17 | +38.0% | +34.3% | −1.8% | +12.3% | +20.8% | +3.7% | +35.0% | −33.3% | +19.9% | +8.6% | +13.4% | −2.1% | +8.5% | +9.5% | +39.8% | +27.2% | +16.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | 6 of 9 | +81.0% | +130% | +23.0% | −42.2% | −14.8% | +57.1% | +5.6% | +29.5% | +72.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MO Altria Group, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +18.2% | +40.8% | −3.7% | +4.4% | +24.2% | −10.2% | +7.9% | −27.1% | +9.4% | +20.4% | +23.1% | +34.5% | +28.4% | +11.8% | +27.7% | +34.0% | +40.3% | −31.6% | +22.3% | +19.7% | +27.7% | +18.2% | +42.9% | −6.9% | +9.3% | +105% | −54.5% | +22.6% | +23.6% |
| XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 8 of 27 | +1.5% | +12.2% | −0.8% | −0.8% | +17.2% | +10.1% | +27.4% | −8.1% | +13.0% | +5.0% | +6.8% | +15.7% | +26.3% | +10.7% | +14.0% | +13.8% | +14.3% | −15.0% | +12.7% | +14.5% | +2.8% | +7.6% | +11.0% | −20.1% | −9.9% | +25.5% | −14.3% | — | — |
| DEO Diageo plc | 10 of 29 | −29.3% | −10.1% | −16.3% | −17.4% | +41.7% | −3.3% | +21.4% | −0.4% | +44.2% | −1.9% | −1.4% | −11.4% | +16.3% | +37.0% | +21.6% | +11.0% | +27.5% | −31.6% | +11.7% | +40.7% | +4.6% | +13.8% | +25.7% | −2.2% | +8.1% | +44.9% | −28.5% | +24.9% | +38.6% |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 6 of 16 | +30.5% | −21.3% | +9.0% | +0.1% | −12.7% | −14.0% | +27.7% | −38.8% | +9.6% | −12.7% | +14.9% | +8.4% | +25.6% | +46.5% | +8.8% | +10.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 15 of 29 | −36.0% | −7.1% | +5.8% | −6.4% | +16.1% | +17.4% | +19.8% | −28.7% | +50.7% | +8.7% | +46.2% | +39.5% | +98.9% | +71.2% | −6.7% | +39.0% | +1.1% | −33.3% | −18.5% | +10.6% | +12.8% | +41.3% | +38.8% | +10.7% | +46.0% | +14.9% | −11.7% | +4.5% | +94.0% |
| TAP Molson Coors Beverage Company | 10 of 29 | −15.5% | −3.4% | +22.1% | +14.4% | +4.1% | −15.2% | −0.4% | −29.9% | −14.1% | +5.4% | +28.7% | +35.7% | +34.6% | +1.3% | −10.7% | +13.9% | −5.7% | −3.8% | +37.0% | +16.4% | −9.7% | +36.6% | −7.0% | +16.3% | −32.5% | +54.9% | −5.8% | +72.5% | +78.4% |
| UVV Universal Corporation | 10 of 29 | +2.3% | −13.4% | +35.8% | +1.8% | +19.6% | −9.0% | +11.1% | +7.8% | −14.8% | +18.0% | +33.1% | −16.2% | +13.6% | +13.2% | +18.4% | −7.0% | +61.0% | −39.5% | +7.8% | +18.2% | −5.8% | +11.9% | +23.8% | +5.4% | +7.8% | +62.5% | −32.2% | −12.1% | +32.2% |
Risk and diversification
How BTI has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were BTI's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents BTI's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of BTI's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: BTI fell 60.8% from January 1999 to March 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 12.6%.
- The slowest recovery came after BTI fell 56.1% from June 2017 to March 2020; it did not regain that peak until February 2025, five years later.
Green means BTI fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | BTI fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −60.8% | +12.6% | Jan 1999 | Mar 2000 | 14 months | Aug 2001 | 17 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −56.1% | −3.0% | Jun 2017 | Mar 2020 | 2.8 years | Feb 2025 | 4.9 years |
| 2008 financial crisis | −42.7% | −39.5% | Apr 2008 | Mar 2009 | 11 months | Sep 2010 | 18 months |
| No named crash | −42.5% | — | Jul 1989 | Sep 1990 | 14 months | Apr 1993 | 2.6 years |
| No named crash | −39.4% | — | Oct 1987 | Jan 1988 | 3 months | Jul 1989 | 18 months |
How did BTI do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far BTI, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, XLP held up best, falling less than BTI in nine of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- BTI fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when BTI fell 20.5% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than BTI.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTI This pageBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. | — | −2.3% | −21.0% | −36.6% | −33.0% | −8.2% | −14.5% | −11.6% | −2.0% | −41.7% | −20.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 5 of 8 | −2.4% | −22.8% | −31.9% | −26.1% | −4.6% | −10.0% | −13.6% | −1.2% | — | — |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −9.1% | −47.9% | −43.2% | −37.8% | −6.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| MO Altria Group, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −0.4% | −25.8% | −31.6% | −26.6% | −7.7% | −8.5% | −7.6% | 0.0% | −38.6% | −35.8% |
| XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 9 of 10 | −1.4% | −16.3% | −24.3% | −13.5% | −5.1% | −9.2% | −10.7% | −0.6% | −32.4% | −32.9% |
| DEO Diageo plc | 5 of 10 | −0.5% | −24.7% | −36.2% | −8.3% | −4.9% | −12.9% | −12.9% | −0.8% | −53.2% | −22.3% |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 3 of 8 | −1.3% | −33.1% | −52.2% | −28.1% | −7.7% | −14.8% | −16.2% | −2.2% | — | — |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −3.8% | −16.3% | −49.3% | −31.1% | −3.3% | −12.4% | −22.5% | −5.5% | −58.4% | −30.2% |
| TAP Molson Coors Beverage Company | 2 of 10 | −4.2% | −20.7% | −36.9% | −16.6% | −8.5% | −12.1% | −17.0% | −2.0% | −43.6% | −45.4% |
| UVV Universal Corporation | 5 of 10 | −1.6% | −28.8% | −24.1% | −21.8% | −2.7% | −9.9% | −13.8% | −6.7% | −59.9% | −25.5% |
How closely does BTI move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares BTI with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, BTI captured 51% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 67% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.55. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
- MO took just 51% of the S&P 500's losses, against 67% for BTI, while still keeping 51% of its gains.
- Four of the nine popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than BTI's 0.76, led by PM, TPB and MO.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than BTI's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTI This pageBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. | 51% | 67% | 0.76 | 0.55 |
| PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 70% | 60% | 1.17 | 0.58 |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | 102% | 89% | 1.15 | 0.78 |
| MO Altria Group, Inc. | 51% | 51% | 1.01 | 0.53 |
| XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 53% | 60% | 0.89 | 0.55 |
| UVV Universal Corporation | 51% | 86% | 0.59 | 0.66 |
| DEO Diageo plc | 46% | 94% | 0.48 | 0.61 |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 48% | 111% | 0.44 | 0.79 |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 51% | 125% | 0.40 | 1.04 |
| TAP Molson Coors Beverage Company | 23% | 103% | 0.23 | 0.75 |
What diversifies BTI?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with BTI's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing BTI with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in BTI into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+17.1% for BTI alone, +19.5% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and SMH have moved largely independently of BTI over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- GLD made money in three of the five calendar years in which BTI lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which BTI lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% BTI and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2020 | 2018 | 2008 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. (this page) | 1.00 | +136% | 0.90 | −19.9% | −4.7% | −49.5% | −30.0% | −38.0% | 22.2% | +17.1% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.22 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +3.9% | −19.8% | −20.8% | — | 18.5% | +19.5% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.46 | +101% | 1.04 | +8.0% | −13.4% | −8.7% | — | — | 19.3% | +17.2% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.07 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | +55.5% | −9.1% | −44.7% | — | 18.6% | +22.6% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.27 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +20.1% | +2.1% | −9.5% | — | — | 18.5% | +16.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.13 | +126% | 0.96 | +12.7% | +24.8% | −1.9% | +4.9% | — | 18.5% | +18.0% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.22 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | +28.2% | −0.9% | — | — | 19.1% | +18.6% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39 | +177% | 0.93 | −0.6% | −32.7% | −18.2% | −39.0% | +18.1% | 20.4% | +18.9% |
| VTV Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 0.48 | +76.6% | 0.90 | +9.3% | +2.3% | −5.5% | −35.9% | — | 19.3% | +16.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2020 | 2018 | 2008 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. (this page) | 1.00 | +136% | 0.90 | −19.9% | −4.7% | −49.5% | −30.0% | −38.0% | 22.2% | +17.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.29 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | +10.1% | −24.5% | −39.6% | −36.8% | 20.0% | +21.8% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.12 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | −2.4% | −16.3% | −20.5% | +350% | 22.4% | +35.2% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.20 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +6.7% | +0.8% | −15.2% | −58.7% | 21.4% | +30.9% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.22 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | +27.1% | −28.4% | −40.4% | −71.3% | 19.5% | +21.2% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.17 | +690% | 1.41 | +30.4% | −27.4% | −8.2% | — | — | 19.9% | +24.0% |
Common questions
What was BTI's worst drawdown?
BTI's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 60.8%, from January 1999 to March 2000. It took 17 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were BTI's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, BTI's best year was 2000, when it returned 70.2%. Its worst was 2018, with a return of -49.5%.
Is there a better investment than BTI?
Among BTI's popular alternatives, PM was ahead of BTI in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CCEP (food & beverages) and KOF (food & beverages) were ahead of BTI in most short and long periods.
Is BTI more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. BTI's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.0%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BTI's return lands within 22.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is BTI's Sharpe ratio?
BTI's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.90, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BTI earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is BTI with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, BTI's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.20 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BTI instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BTI holding.
What are the best alternatives to BTI?
Of the nine popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed BTI in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: PM.
Did BTI outperform the S&P 500?
BTI finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 18 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +66.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did BTI do in stock market crashes?
BTI fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when BTI fell 20.5% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies BTI?
These had a low correlation with BTI over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.22), EMLP (correlation 0.46) and SMH (correlation -0.07); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.29), CLS (correlation 0.12) and FIX (correlation 0.20). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than BTI's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of BTI's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.