Relative Intelligence · Computer Hardware

How Apple (AAPL) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on AAPL alone. It places AAPL (Apple Inc.) against 12 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where AAPL stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: AAPL's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, AAPL rose 24.6% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its computer hardware peers were far apart over the past 6 months, from DELL (Dell Technologies, up 127%) to GOOG (Alphabet, up 0.4%). Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?AAPL rose 4.0% over the past 3 months, in line with the computer hardware ETF XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF), which rose 5.7%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its computer hardware peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: DELL (Dell Technologies) rose 21.3%, while GOOG (Alphabet) fell 4.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsAAPL has outpaced the market, rising 29.9% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (99.0% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termAAPL turned $10,000 into $127,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. AAPL's 10-year return of 1,168% puts it ahead of 96% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAAPL fell harder than the S&P 500 in five of seven sell-offs. The Covid crash was the exception: AAPL fell 30.7%, less than the S&P 500's 33.7%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAAPL is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.68 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.66 with the total US market, more closely than 98% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing) and DELL (Dell Technologies) were ahead of AAPL in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.5% and 54.4% volatility against 28.0%).
- Nearby categories and themes
- ADI (Analog Devices, semiconductors) and NTAP (NetApp, computer hardware) were ahead of AAPL in most short and long periods.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 48 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than AAPL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT (Walmart), XOM (Exxonmobil) and ABBV (AbbVie).
How much would $10,000 in AAPL have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in AAPL over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of AAPL over the same span and AAPL's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in AAPL at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $20,534,853 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Over the past 29 years, only one of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded that long, leveraged funds aside, ended ahead of AAPL. Over the past 5 years, 546 did, and DELL turned $10,000 into $112,363, against $24,129 for AAPL.
- One of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of AAPL, and MNST finished highest, at $45,663,831.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. One of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AAPL. The other 7 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MNST$46M+456,538% total · +33.7% a year
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- QCOM$779,813+7,698% total · +16.2% a year
- LOGI$631,227+6,212% total · +15.4% a year
- BBY$604,450+5,945% total · +15.2% a year
- SWKS$176,981+1,670% total · +10.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- CRUS$82,741+727% total · +7.6% a year
- HPQ$65,988+560% total · +6.7% a year
- SONY$30,560+206% total · +3.9% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 546 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AAPL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- DELL$112,363+1,024% total · +62.2% a year
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- TSM$43,622+336% total · +34.3% a year
- NTAP$26,224+162% total · +21.3% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- ADI$25,751+158% total · +20.8% a year
- AAPL$24,129+141% total · +19.3% a year
- GRMN$20,536+105% total · +15.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- BBY$10,541+5.4% total · +1.1% a year
AAPL at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- AAPL's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 81.8%, from March 2000 to April 2003. It took 21 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, AAPL's best was 1998, when it returned 212%, and its worst was 2000, when it lost 71.1%. It lost money in seven of those years.
- AAPL is 1.1% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $5.0T
- Industry
- Consumer Electronics
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +29.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +99.0%+25.8% a year
- Past 5 years
- +133%+18.5% a year
- Past 10 years
- +1,168%+28.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +212%1998
- Worst calendar year
- −71.1%2000
- Losing years
- 7 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 28.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.75return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −81.8%Mar 2000 to Apr 2003
- From its all-time high
- −1.1%below the peak
AAPL against the whole market
Where AAPL ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does AAPL rank among all stocks?
This section ranks AAPL on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how AAPL stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- AAPL's 10-year return ranks in the top 4% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | AAPL | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +29.9% | 981 of 3,287 | top 30% |
| 3-year return | +99.0% | 924 of 3,017 | top 31% |
| 5-year return | +133% | 515 of 2,893 | top 18% |
| 10-year return | +1,168% | 85 of 2,202 | top 4% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 28.0% | 555 of 2,893 | top 19% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.75 | 367 of 2,893 | top 13% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −38.5% | 119 of 2,187 | top 5% |
What has beaten AAPL on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). AAPL sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than AAPL with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 34 stocks and 14 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than AAPL over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half AAPL's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 12% less than AAPL's 28.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.75 for AAPL.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to AAPL; faint dots are 39 more of the 48 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× AAPL's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than AAPL?
Investments that beat AAPL over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among AAPL's popular alternatives, TSM and DELL were ahead of AAPL in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.5% and 54.4% volatility against 28.0%).
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ADI (semiconductors) and NTAP (computer hardware) were ahead of AAPL in most short and long periods.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 48 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than AAPL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT, XOM and ABBV.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat AAPL over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks AAPL's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than AAPL follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than AAPL's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× AAPL's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than AAPL's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with AAPL?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.68 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against AAPL. 2 of 12 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 2 shownEverything else in Computer Hardware and the categories next to it (Semiconductors, Communications Equipment, Software, IT Services), plus AAPL's specific themes. 2 of 166 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.44 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.60 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 144 of 3,455 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.15 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.07 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.32 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.07 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.23 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.20 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.44 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.06 | 0.40% | ||
What these numbers mean for AAPL
- Annual return
- AAPL returned 18.5% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $23,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- AAPL's volatility over the past 5 years was 28.0%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AAPL's return lands within 28.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- AAPL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.75, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AAPL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- AAPL's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 38.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 38.5% fall takes a 62.6% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, AAPL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.68 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AAPL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AAPL holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 48 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than AAPL with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 44 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with AAPL | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.15 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.07 | — | |
| 3 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.32 | 0.48% |
| 4 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.07 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.17 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.23 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.03 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.12 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.33 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.28 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.16 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | -0.04 | — | |
| 13 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.35 | — |
| 14 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.18 | — |
| 15 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.12 | — | |
| 16 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.39 | 0.59% |
| 17 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.16 | — |
| 18 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.40 | 0.19% |
| 19 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.22 | — |
| 20 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.21 | — |
| 21 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.13 | 0.61% |
| 22 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.27 | 0.59% |
| 23 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.24 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.06 | — | |
| 25 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.41 | 0.45% |
| 26 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.18 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.19 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.03 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.31 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.15 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.37 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.29 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.15 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.38 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.15 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | 0.13 | 0.08% | |
| 37 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.25 | — |
| 38 | ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 24.5% | 0.87 | −53.8% | +309% | 0.03 | — |
| 39 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | -0.03 | 0.80% |
| 40 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.22 | — |
| 41 | AMAntero Midstream Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +20.0% | 25.9% | 0.84 | −92.9% | — | 0.17 | — |
| 42 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.33 | — |
| 43 | IYEiShares U.S. Energy ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.1% | 25.2% | 0.89 | −68.6% | +159% | 0.15 | 0.37% |
| 44 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.24 | 0.95% |
See everything that outperformed AAPL →
AAPL against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against AAPL, compared period by period and year by year.
How do AAPL's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at AAPL, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 12 popular alternatives earned more than AAPL over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Nine of the 12 popular alternatives earned less than AAPL over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, AAPL returned 18.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (28.0% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than AAPL with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | +55.2% | 54.4% |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | +31.5% | 38.5% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| AAPL This pageApple Inc. | +18.4% | 28.0% |
| GRMN Garmin Ltd. | +14.8% | 31.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | +8.2% | 42.8% |
| CRUS Cirrus Logic, Inc. | +6.5% | 36.9% |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | +5.7% | 37.0% |
| HPQ HP Inc. | +5.7% | 37.3% |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | +2.9% | 29.2% |
| BBY Best Buy Co., Inc. | +0.7% | 38.1% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | −10.8% | 42.9% |
| SONO Sonos, Inc. | −11.9% | 48.7% |
Has AAPL consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares AAPL with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than AAPL helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- DELL outperformed AAPL in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the 12 popular alternatives, DELL and TSM, outperformed AAPL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than AAPL over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| AAPL Apple Inc. (this page) | — | +0.2% | +4.0% | +24.6% | +25.6% | +29.9% | +99.0% | +133% | +1,168% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | — | $5.0T | — |
| DELL QualifiedDell Technologies Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −19.6% | +21.3% | +127% | +265% | +217% | +636% | +800% | +3,701% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | — | $294B | — |
| TSM QualifiedTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 3/5 short3/3 long | −4.5% | +5.9% | +16.6% | +34.0% | +44.3% | +382% | +293% | +1,505% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | — | $2.2T | — |
| GOOG Internet Content & InformationAlphabet Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | +752% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| GRMN Hardware, Equipment & PartsGarmin Ltd. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +3.6% | +19.1% | +9.4% | +45.2% | +18.5% | +196% | +99.1% | +670% | 31.6% | 0.59 | −54.6% | — | $56B | — |
| BBY Specialty RetailBest Buy Co., Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +0.7% | +11.4% | +43.6% | +41.1% | +22.1% | +58.2% | +3.5% | +242% | 38.1% | 0.21 | −52.6% | — | $20B | — |
| HPQ Computer HardwareHP Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −5.3% | +30.1% | +62.8% | +46.5% | +18.6% | +35.8% | +31.9% | +207% | 37.3% | 0.33 | −51.2% | — | $28B | — |
| SWKS SemiconductorsSkyworks Solutions, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −8.4% | +36.0% | +37.9% | +28.9% | +10.2% | −2.8% | −43.5% | +29.2% | 42.9% | -0.05 | −72.9% | — | $12B | — |
| LOGI Computer HardwareLogitech International S.A. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +5.6% | +9.1% | +11.0% | +10.7% | +0.8% | +65.4% | +32.1% | +489% | 37.0% | 0.34 | −67.8% | — | $16B | — |
| SONY Consumer ElectronicsSony Group Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +7.3% | +19.7% | +18.1% | −2.2% | −13.2% | +54.0% | +15.4% | +309% | 29.2% | 0.24 | −50.6% | — | $150B | — |
| SONO Consumer ElectronicsSonos, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +6.2% | +14.3% | +18.8% | −0.7% | +2.5% | +55.2% | −47.1% | — | 48.7% | -0.02 | −82.5% | — | $2.1B | — |
| QCOM SemiconductorsQUALCOMM Incorporated | 1/5 short0/3 long | −9.5% | +3.7% | +28.9% | +3.2% | +7.4% | +72.4% | +48.3% | +239% | 42.8% | 0.40 | −44.3% | — | $188B | — |
| CRUS SemiconductorsCirrus Logic, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −7.6% | −19.0% | −34.2% | −7.4% | −15.6% | +63.6% | +37.1% | +106% | 36.9% | 0.35 | −55.9% | — | $5.6B | — |
How did AAPL do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where AAPL ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with AAPL and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, AAPL finished in the top quarter in 15 of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 9 of 13.
- AAPL finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 19 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, DELL came out ahead of AAPL most often, in five of the nine years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of AAPL; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places AAPL among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of AAPL | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL This pageApple Inc. | — | +9.0% | +30.7% | +49.0% | −26.4% | +34.6% | +82.3% | +89.0% | −5.4% | +48.5% | +12.5% | −3.0% | +40.6% | +8.0% | +32.6% | +25.5% | +53.2% | +147% | −56.9% | +133% | +18.1% | +123% | +201% | +49.1% | −34.6% | +47.2% | −71.1% | +151% | +212% | −37.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 15 of 29 | 9 of 13 | 5 of 13 | 4 of 13 | 5 of 13 | 4 of 13 | 3 of 13 | 2 of 13 | 7 of 12 | 3 of 12 | 9 of 11 | 7 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 9 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 2 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 3 of 11 | 8 of 11 | 1 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 1 of 11 | 1 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 9 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 2 of 9 | 7 of 7 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 5 of 9 | +11.2% | +53.0% | +95.9% | −26.6% | +51.3% | +42.6% | +5.1% | +8.6% | +47.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 12 of 28 | +55.7% | +92.0% | +41.8% | −37.0% | +11.7% | +91.6% | +63.3% | −4.3% | +37.9% | +31.2% | +4.9% | +31.1% | +4.5% | +37.7% | +7.3% | +14.9% | +52.9% | −16.1% | −4.3% | +18.9% | +27.1% | −4.2% | +56.7% | −54.8% | +39.5% | −51.0% | +290% | +13.4% | — |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 7 of 21 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% | +29.1% | −1.0% | +35.6% | +1.7% | +44.5% | −6.0% | +58.5% | +9.5% | +8.8% | −4.2% | +101% | −55.5% | +50.2% | +11.1% | +115% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 8 of 25 | −0.1% | +63.3% | +43.1% | −30.2% | +15.9% | +25.9% | +58.1% | +9.8% | +27.6% | +36.5% | −26.1% | +18.3% | +18.6% | +6.7% | +34.7% | +5.1% | +64.1% | −79.3% | +75.6% | +69.5% | +9.9% | +12.7% | +87.6% | +37.4% | +7.8% | — | — | — | — |
| BBY Best Buy Co., Inc. | 10 of 29 | −17.8% | +14.4% | +2.5% | −17.5% | +4.4% | +16.7% | +70.5% | −20.6% | +64.5% | +46.5% | −18.8% | +0.1% | +244% | −47.3% | −30.3% | −11.8% | +43.2% | −45.9% | +7.8% | +13.9% | +10.8% | +14.6% | +117% | −51.3% | +152% | −41.2% | +63.7% | +233% | +247% |
| HPQ HP Inc. | 10 of 29 | −28.7% | +12.2% | +16.1% | −26.4% | +57.2% | +24.3% | +3.9% | −0.2% | +43.5% | +31.2% | −33.3% | +46.2% | +101% | −43.1% | −37.8% | −17.8% | +43.1% | −27.6% | +23.5% | +45.1% | +38.4% | −7.1% | +34.4% | −14.0% | −34.1% | −0.4% | +67.9% | +11.0% | +26.0% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 9 of 29 | −25.5% | −18.9% | +26.5% | −40.0% | +2.7% | +28.4% | +84.1% | −28.3% | +28.7% | −1.2% | +6.7% | +156% | +40.6% | +25.2% | −43.4% | +102% | +156% | −34.8% | +20.2% | +38.9% | −45.9% | +8.4% | +0.9% | −60.5% | −41.1% | +29.1% | +139% | +123% | +104% |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | 11 of 28 | +23.4% | −12.0% | +55.2% | −22.9% | −14.3% | +109% | +53.5% | −5.7% | +38.1% | +68.8% | +16.6% | +1.7% | +86.1% | +5.2% | −58.1% | +8.4% | +9.8% | −57.5% | +28.1% | +22.3% | +54.1% | +42.8% | +39.3% | −15.4% | +49.0% | +75.8% | +143% | −24.5% | — |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 10 of 29 | +21.7% | +12.4% | +24.9% | −39.3% | +25.6% | +49.7% | +41.7% | +8.1% | +61.1% | +14.8% | +20.7% | +19.0% | +56.6% | −36.7% | −48.8% | +24.1% | +34.2% | −59.3% | +27.3% | +5.6% | +5.5% | +13.0% | −15.6% | −8.0% | −34.9% | −51.1% | +297% | −20.2% | +39.1% |
| SONO Sonos, Inc. | 1 of 7 | +16.8% | −12.3% | +1.4% | −43.3% | +27.4% | +49.7% | +59.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 8 of 29 | +13.8% | +8.3% | +35.1% | −38.6% | +22.3% | +77.1% | +60.8% | −7.6% | +1.1% | +35.1% | −30.6% | +2.3% | +22.4% | +14.9% | +12.3% | +9.0% | +31.1% | −7.6% | +5.5% | −11.3% | +2.5% | +58.3% | +49.1% | −28.0% | −38.5% | −53.3% | +2,621% | +6.4% | +27.2% |
| CRUS Cirrus Logic, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +19.0% | +19.7% | +11.7% | −19.1% | +11.9% | −0.3% | +148% | −36.0% | −8.3% | +91.5% | +25.3% | +15.4% | −29.5% | +82.8% | −0.8% | +134% | +154% | −49.2% | −23.3% | +3.0% | +21.2% | −28.3% | +167% | −78.2% | −29.5% | +40.9% | +35.7% | −7.7% | −31.4% |
Risk and diversification
How AAPL has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were AAPL's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents AAPL's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of AAPL's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: AAPL fell 43.8% from September 2012 to April 2013, while the S&P 500 rose 7.8%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 21 months, after AAPL fell 81.8% from March 2000 to April 2003.
Green means AAPL fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | AAPL fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −81.8% | −37.9% | Mar 2000 | Apr 2003 | 3.1 years | Jan 2005 | 21 months |
| No named crash | −81.2% | — | Apr 1991 | Dec 1997 | 6.7 years | Sep 1999 | 21 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −60.9% | −44.0% | Dec 2007 | Jan 2009 | 13 months | Oct 2009 | 9 months |
| No named crash | −56.5% | — | Oct 1987 | Oct 1990 | 3 years | Feb 1991 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −43.8% | +7.8% | Sep 2012 | Apr 2013 | 7 months | Jul 2014 | 15 months |
How did AAPL do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far AAPL, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, LOGI held up best, falling less than AAPL in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- AAPL fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when AAPL fell 81.2% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than AAPL.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL This pageApple Inc. | — | −2.9% | −27.4% | −30.7% | −36.5% | −4.8% | −23.4% | −12.5% | −4.3% | −60.9% | −81.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 1 of 5 | −5.7% | −43.6% | −45.9% | −28.6% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 5 of 10 | −3.9% | −54.3% | −23.3% | −21.4% | −9.3% | −13.2% | −15.7% | 0.0% | −48.0% | −82.4% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 3 of 9 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 5 of 9 | −3.2% | −40.0% | −38.1% | −12.9% | −3.1% | −20.3% | −9.3% | 0.0% | −87.7% | — |
| BBY Best Buy Co., Inc. | 2 of 10 | −6.6% | −40.7% | −44.3% | −39.7% | −4.5% | −33.1% | −25.2% | −1.1% | −66.9% | −74.1% |
| HPQ HP Inc. | 3 of 10 | −3.3% | −37.9% | −43.3% | −26.1% | −11.3% | −37.8% | −40.4% | −3.2% | −51.7% | −82.9% |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −3.0% | −50.0% | −43.0% | −32.3% | −5.3% | −38.6% | −37.2% | −3.4% | −66.0% | −95.7% |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | 6 of 10 | −0.8% | −48.3% | −21.3% | −35.9% | −8.3% | −14.3% | −33.7% | −3.0% | −79.4% | −59.0% |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 4 of 10 | −3.8% | −50.6% | −22.9% | −24.3% | −9.7% | −30.2% | −32.0% | −1.0% | −72.3% | −76.2% |
| SONO Sonos, Inc. | 0 of 4 | −3.2% | −55.1% | −50.7% | −40.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 3 of 10 | −5.6% | −41.5% | −32.2% | −26.8% | −6.6% | −30.7% | −19.2% | −0.5% | −48.0% | −84.9% |
| CRUS Cirrus Logic, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −4.1% | −32.3% | −37.4% | −25.2% | −13.9% | −27.4% | −21.4% | −5.6% | −70.5% | −96.8% |
How closely does AAPL move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares AAPL with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, AAPL captured 137% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 94% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.15. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only DELL and TSM had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than AAPL's 1.46, out of 11 popular alternatives with the same record.
- DELL took just 43% of the S&P 500's losses, against 94% for AAPL, while still keeping 154% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than AAPL's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL This pageApple Inc. | 137% | 94% | 1.46 | 1.15 |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 154% | 43% | 3.59 | 1.13 |
| TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 138% | 75% | 1.84 | 1.15 |
| GRMN Garmin Ltd. | 111% | 80% | 1.39 | 0.93 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 132% | 110% | 1.20 | 1.12 |
| LOGI Logitech International S.A. | 112% | 106% | 1.05 | 1.01 |
| SONY Sony Group Corporation | 96% | 99% | 0.97 | 0.86 |
| CRUS Cirrus Logic, Inc. | 71% | 85% | 0.84 | 1.02 |
| QCOM QUALCOMM Incorporated | 115% | 139% | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| BBY Best Buy Co., Inc. | 127% | 164% | 0.77 | 1.40 |
| HPQ HP Inc. | 106% | 137% | 0.77 | 1.11 |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 88% | 149% | 0.59 | 1.31 |
What diversifies AAPL?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with AAPL's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing AAPL with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in AAPL into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+19.3% for AAPL alone, +19.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of AAPL over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.32 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- CAH made money in four of the seven calendar years in which AAPL lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which AAPL lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% AAPL and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2008 | 2002 | 2000 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL Apple Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +133% | 0.75 | −26.4% | −5.4% | −3.0% | −56.9% | −34.6% | −71.1% | −37.1% | 24.7% | +19.3% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.32 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.4% | +19.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.32 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −20.8% | — | — | — | 20.7% | +21.3% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.30 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | 20.8% | +19.0% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.32 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −3.0% | −0.3% | — | — | — | — | 20.8% | +18.3% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.49 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | −44.7% | −47.0% | — | — | 24.0% | +23.6% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.47 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | −9.5% | +4.1% | — | — | — | — | 20.9% | +18.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.06 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +4.9% | — | — | — | 20.3% | +19.9% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.40 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 21.8% | +20.3% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2008 | 2002 | 2000 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL Apple Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +133% | 0.75 | −26.4% | −5.4% | −3.0% | −56.9% | −34.6% | −71.1% | −37.1% | 24.7% | +19.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.15 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | −39.6% | −8.3% | +108% | +29.1% | 21.2% | +23.8% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.25 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −20.5% | −65.1% | −2.3% | — | 25.3% | +36.8% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.24 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −15.2% | −9.4% | −71.1% | — | 23.6% | +32.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.17 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +61.2% | +96.3% | 21.2% | +23.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.07 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | 21.2% | +26.1% |
Common questions
What was AAPL's worst drawdown?
AAPL's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 81.8%, from March 2000 to April 2003. It took 21 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were AAPL's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, AAPL's best year was 1998, when it returned 212%. Its worst was 2000, with a return of -71.1%.
Is there a better investment than AAPL?
Among AAPL's popular alternatives, TSM and DELL were ahead of AAPL in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.5% and 54.4% volatility against 28.0%). Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ADI (semiconductors) and NTAP (computer hardware) were ahead of AAPL in most short and long periods.
Is AAPL more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. AAPL's volatility over the past 5 years was 28.0%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AAPL's return lands within 28.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is AAPL's Sharpe ratio?
AAPL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.75, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AAPL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is AAPL with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, AAPL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.68 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AAPL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AAPL holding.
What are the best alternatives to AAPL?
Of the 12 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed AAPL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: DELL and TSM.
Did AAPL outperform the S&P 500?
AAPL finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 19 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +9.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did AAPL do in stock market crashes?
AAPL fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when AAPL fell 81.2% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies AAPL?
These had a low correlation with AAPL over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.32), DXJ (correlation 0.32) and EMLP (correlation 0.30); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.15), CLS (correlation 0.25) and FIX (correlation 0.24). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than AAPL's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of AAPL's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to AAPL
DELLDell Technologies
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
GOOGAlphabet
GRMNGarmin
SONYSony Group
QCOMQUALCOMM