Relative Intelligence · Biotechnology

How Amgen (AMGN) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on AMGN alone. It places AMGN (Amgen Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where AMGN stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: AMGN's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowAMGN has run far ahead of the market, rising 27.0% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 6 months, ABBV (AbbVie) rose 43.8% and AZN (AstraZeneca) fell 15.3%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?More than an industry move: AMGN rose 21.2% over the past 3 months, against 1.5% for the biotechnology ETF XBI (State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF). The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. AMGN rose 11.6% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, AMGN rose 48.7% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termAMGN turned $10,000 into $36,600 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: AMGN rose 145% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAMGN fell less than the S&P 500 in five of seven sell-offs, but the 2015 China and oil sell-off broke the pattern: it fell 22.1%, more than the S&P 500's 12.8%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAMGN is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.26 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.25 with the total US market, less closely than 77% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, AMGN's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.54: 74% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 64% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- EXEL (Exelixis, biotechnology) was ahead of AMGN in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (35.8% volatility against 24.9%).
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 12 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than AMGN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT (Walmart), ABBV (AbbVie) and PM (Philip Morris International).
How much would $10,000 in AMGN have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in AMGN over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of AMGN over the same span and AMGN's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in AMGN at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $526,909 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of AMGN, and GILD finished highest, at $1,571,438.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 96 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AMGN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- GILD$2M+15,614% total · +19.1% a year
- DHR$777,394+7,674% total · +16.2% a year
- REGN$683,800+6,738% total · +15.7% a year
- WST$660,969+6,510% total · +15.5% a year
- NVO$560,210+5,502% total · +14.9% a year
- AMGN$526,909+5,169% total · +14.6% a year
- LLY$396,376+3,864% total · +13.5% a year
- VRTX$276,941+2,669% total · +12.1% a year
- MCK$208,304+1,983% total · +11.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 595 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AMGN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- MCK$43,941+339% total · +34.5% a year
- UTHR$29,358+194% total · +24.0% a year
- ABBV$29,134+191% total · +23.8% a year
- VRTX$28,822+188% total · +23.6% a year
- EXEL$27,629+176% total · +22.5% a year
- GILD$25,496+155% total · +20.6% a year
- AMGN$23,160+132% total · +18.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- WST$8,848−11.5% total · −2.4% a year
AMGN at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- AMGN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 63.5%, from March to October 1987. It took 20 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, AMGN's best was 1999, when it returned 130%, and its worst was 2007, when it lost 32.0%. It lost money in ten of those years.
- AMGN is 1.2% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $237B
- Industry
- Drug Manufacturers - General
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +48.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +72.2%+19.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +145%+19.6% a year
- Past 10 years
- +266%+13.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +130%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −32.0%2007
- Losing years
- 10 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 24.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.85return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −63.5%Mar 1987 to Oct 1987
- From its all-time high
- −1.2%below the peak
AMGN against the whole market
Where AMGN ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does AMGN rank among all stocks?
This section ranks AMGN on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how AMGN stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- AMGN's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 1% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | AMGN | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +48.7% | 577 of 3,287 | top 18% |
| 3-year return | +72.2% | 1,216 of 3,017 | top 40% |
| 5-year return | +145% | 470 of 2,893 | top 16% |
| 10-year return | +266% | 670 of 2,202 | top 30% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 24.9% | 316 of 2,893 | top 11% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.85 | 235 of 2,893 | top 8% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −24.9% | 6 of 2,187 | top 1% |
What has beaten AMGN on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). AMGN sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than AMGN with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Six stocks and six ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than AMGN over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half AMGN's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 23% less than AMGN's 24.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.85 for AMGN.
- Among AMGN's popular alternatives, ABBV is in the region. ABBV earned 26.1% a year against 19.6% a year for AMGN, at 23.4% volatility, 6% less than AMGN's 24.9%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to AMGN; faint dots are 5 more of the 12 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than AMGN?
Investments that beat AMGN over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among AMGN's popular alternatives, ABBV earned more than AMGN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 26.1% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 19.6% a year at 24.9%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, EXEL (biotechnology) was ahead of AMGN in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (35.8% volatility against 24.9%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 12 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than AMGN with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT, ABBV and PM.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat AMGN over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks AMGN's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than AMGN follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than AMGN's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× AMGN's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than AMGN's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with AMGN?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.26 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 4 shownThe investments people most often weigh against AMGN. 4 of 22 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.38 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 1 shownEverything else in Biotechnology and the categories next to it (Pharmaceuticals, Life Sciences Tools, Contract Research), plus AMGN's specific themes. 1 of 77 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
EXELExelixis, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return in most periods | +24.4% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | +448% | 0.13 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 50 of 3,534 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.47 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.39 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.38 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.15 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.34 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, lower volatility | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.42 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatility | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.29 | — | ||
MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy | Similar return, lower volatility | +18.6% | 19.7% | 0.97 | −64.6% | +186% | 0.38 | 0.45% | |
What these numbers mean for AMGN
- Annual return
- AMGN returned 19.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $24,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- AMGN's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.9%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AMGN's return lands within 24.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- AMGN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.85, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AMGN earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- AMGN's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 24.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 24.9% fall takes a 33.1% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, AMGN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.26 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AMGN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AMGN holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 12 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than AMGN with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 11 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with AMGN | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.47 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.39 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.15 | — | |
| 4 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.34 | 0.48% |
| 5 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.42 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.50 | — | |
| 7 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.20 | 0.80% |
| 8 | Popular alternative | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.47 | — | |
| 9 | IXCiShares Global Energy ETF · International | Whole market | +20.7% | 23.2% | 0.93 | −64.2% | +183% | 0.45 | 0.37% |
| 10 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.30 | 0.45% |
| 11 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.38 | 0.95% |
AMGN against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against AMGN, compared period by period and year by year.
How do AMGN's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at AMGN, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only ABBV was both more rewarding and calmer than AMGN over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- 14 of the 22 popular alternatives earned less than AMGN over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, AMGN returned 19.6% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (24.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than AMGN with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | +40.7% | 32.8% |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | +38.7% | 25.0% |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | +26.1% | 23.4% |
| UTHR United Therapeutics Corporation | +23.6% | 35.1% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | +22.8% | 24.9% |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | +22.6% | 29.1% |
| AMGN This pageAmgen Inc. | +19.6% | 24.9% |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | +16.3% | 24.8% |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | +12.7% | 17.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | +12.2% | 30.1% |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | +8.7% | 35.7% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +7.7% | 31.1% |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | +6.6% | 33.2% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | +5.5% | 24.9% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | +2.9% | 27.8% |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +2.5% | 50.9% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | +1.3% | 34.7% |
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | −1.0% | 40.7% |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | −1.7% | 25.4% |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | −1.8% | 34.7% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | −3.8% | 29.1% |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | −4.0% | 39.1% |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | −5.6% | 33.0% |
Has AMGN consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares AMGN with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than AMGN helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 22 popular alternatives outperformed AMGN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was LLY.
- ABBV outperformed AMGN over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so AMGN has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than AMGN over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| AMGN Amgen Inc. (this page) | — | +11.6% | +21.2% | +27.0% | +36.7% | +48.7% | +72.2% | +145% | +266% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | — | $237B | — |
| LLY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralEli Lilly and Company | 2/5 short3/3 long | +10.2% | +12.1% | +40.0% | +19.4% | +59.7% | +124% | +451% | +1,807% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | — | $1.2T | — |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 2/5 short3/3 long | +16.2% | +24.0% | +20.2% | +25.5% | +31.3% | +131% | +413% | +586% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | — | $120B | — |
| ABBV Drug Manufacturers - GeneralAbbVie Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | +9.9% | +14.8% | +43.8% | +29.8% | +28.3% | +118% | +218% | +603% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | — | $511B | — |
| UTHR BiotechnologyUnited Therapeutics Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | +12.3% | +4.6% | −3.4% | +11.5% | +28.0% | +146% | +188% | +390% | 35.1% | 0.78 | −55.6% | — | $24B | — |
| VRTX BiotechnologyVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 0/5 short2/3 long | +0.8% | +7.1% | +17.2% | +13.8% | +22.8% | +42.2% | +177% | +521% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | — | $130B | — |
| GILD Drug Manufacturers - GeneralGilead Sciences, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | +4.0% | +18.2% | +16.6% | +31.0% | +30.3% | +121% | +180% | +200% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | — | $194B | — |
| WST Medical - Instruments & SuppliesWest Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +7.5% | +10.4% | +40.0% | +41.0% | +41.9% | +7.8% | −5.0% | +455% | 40.7% | 0.19 | −59.3% | — | $27B | — |
| TMO Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchThermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +4.3% | +30.7% | +30.9% | +16.3% | +26.8% | +49.5% | +15.1% | +366% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | — | $254B | — |
| ALNY BiotechnologyAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −5.6% | −15.4% | −25.8% | −42.3% | −53.0% | +42.6% | +13.2% | +514% | 50.9% | 0.29 | −58.2% | — | $31B | — |
| JNJ Drug Manufacturers - GeneralJohnson & Johnson | 0/5 short1/3 long | −3.8% | +4.8% | +13.6% | +27.1% | +36.9% | +84.6% | +82.1% | +196% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | — | $625B | — |
| INCY BiotechnologyIncyte Corporation | 0/5 short1/3 long | −6.4% | +0.8% | +20.3% | +15.0% | +35.3% | +112% | +77.6% | +31.8% | 30.1% | 0.53 | −66.5% | — | $24B | — |
| MRK Drug Manufacturers - GeneralMerck & Co., Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −0.8% | +19.9% | +28.3% | +42.2% | +76.8% | +58.3% | +113% | +241% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | — | $366B | — |
| IQV Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchIQVIA Holdings Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −0.8% | +31.4% | +51.5% | +18.8% | +26.3% | +45.3% | +6.5% | +260% | 34.7% | 0.21 | −51.5% | — | $44B | — |
| BIIB Drug Manufacturers - GeneralBiogen Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +11.0% | +21.6% | +32.6% | +36.7% | +65.8% | −5.6% | −8.8% | −18.9% | 34.7% | 0.11 | −72.7% | — | $36B | — |
| PFE Drug Manufacturers - GeneralPfizer Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +8.5% | +23.8% | +13.2% | +25.7% | +30.5% | +19.2% | −8.3% | +55.0% | 25.4% | 0.06 | −58.9% | — | $172B | — |
| AZN Drug Manufacturers - GeneralAstraZeneca PLC | 0/5 short0/3 long | +0.4% | +3.3% | −15.3% | −7.0% | +1.8% | +38.8% | +52.1% | +257% | 35.7% | 0.41 | −28.7% | — | $262B | — |
| DHR Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchDanaher Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +4.0% | +11.6% | +15.0% | −2.2% | +8.3% | +10.8% | −17.6% | +232% | 29.1% | 0.01 | −43.8% | — | $157B | — |
| NBIX BiotechnologyNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.4% | −17.9% | +7.9% | +1.0% | +0.5% | +28.6% | +37.4% | +211% | 33.2% | 0.36 | −46.4% | — | $14B | — |
| NVO Drug Manufacturers - GeneralNovo Nordisk A/S | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.1% | −20.0% | −1.5% | −23.9% | −28.5% | −57.0% | −18.5% | +134% | 39.1% | 0.09 | −75.2% | — | $174B | — |
| REGN BiotechnologyRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +1.2% | +20.3% | +8.0% | +4.4% | +40.7% | +0.8% | +44.9% | +120% | 31.1% | 0.40 | −59.7% | — | $83B | — |
| BMY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralBristol-Myers Squibb Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.5% | +3.6% | +6.6% | +19.1% | +47.8% | +25.8% | +30.6% | +74.8% | 24.9% | 0.34 | −47.7% | — | $126B | — |
| BMRN BiotechnologyBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −11.9% | −4.5% | +2.8% | −5.1% | +6.3% | −31.3% | −24.9% | −33.0% | 33.0% | -0.01 | −62.1% | — | $11B | — |
How did AMGN do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where AMGN ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with AMGN and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- AMGN finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, TMO came out ahead of AMGN most often, in 18 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, AMGN finished in the top quarter in five of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in seven. In 2025, it ranked 10 of 23.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of AMGN; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places AMGN among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of AMGN | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMGN This pageAmgen Inc. | — | +29.7% | −6.8% | +13.5% | +20.4% | +0.9% | −2.0% | +27.6% | +15.2% | +22.3% | −7.6% | +4.0% | +42.3% | +34.8% | +36.8% | +18.2% | −3.0% | −2.0% | +24.3% | −32.0% | −13.4% | +22.9% | +3.8% | +27.8% | −14.4% | −11.7% | +6.5% | +130% | +93.3% | −0.4% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 29 | 10 of 23 | 18 of 23 | 7 of 23 | 11 of 23 | 18 of 23 | 19 of 23 | 12 of 23 | 6 of 23 | 10 of 23 | 11 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 6 of 23 | 15 of 22 | 8 of 21 | 7 of 21 | 18 of 21 | 17 of 21 | 2 of 21 | 19 of 21 | 19 of 21 | 10 of 21 | 10 of 20 | 9 of 20 | 8 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 16 of 20 | 3 of 18 | 1 of 18 | 15 of 18 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 14 of 29 | +40.3% | +33.3% | +60.9% | +34.3% | +66.1% | +31.0% | +16.2% | +40.5% | +17.8% | −10.4% | +25.4% | +39.8% | +7.3% | +24.2% | +25.2% | +3.6% | −6.2% | −21.3% | +5.7% | −5.2% | +2.6% | −17.6% | +13.1% | −17.6% | −14.4% | +41.9% | −24.3% | +29.1% | +93.6% |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 15 of 29 | +44.5% | +23.7% | +24.1% | +51.8% | +44.2% | +27.1% | +26.7% | −28.4% | +12.0% | −28.3% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +67.7% | +25.6% | +11.8% | +13.8% | +62.9% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −1.2% | +64.9% | −1.4% | +19.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | −71.3% | +46.9% | +96.3% |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 8 of 13 | +33.1% | +18.9% | −0.2% | +24.0% | +32.4% | +27.7% | +1.5% | −1.0% | +60.1% | +9.8% | −6.5% | +27.9% | +60.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| UTHR United Therapeutics Corporation | 14 of 26 | +38.1% | +60.5% | −20.9% | +28.7% | +42.4% | +72.3% | −19.1% | −26.4% | +3.1% | −8.4% | +20.9% | +14.5% | +112% | +13.1% | −25.3% | +20.1% | +68.3% | −35.9% | +79.7% | −21.3% | +53.1% | +96.7% | +37.5% | +60.3% | −29.4% | −67.9% | — | — | — |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 14 of 29 | +12.6% | −1.0% | +40.9% | +31.5% | −7.1% | +7.9% | +32.1% | +10.6% | +103% | −41.4% | +5.9% | +59.9% | +77.3% | +26.2% | −5.2% | −18.3% | +41.0% | +30.8% | −37.9% | +35.2% | +162% | +2.1% | −34.7% | −35.5% | −65.6% | +309% | +17.6% | −9.8% | −18.0% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 16 of 29 | +36.6% | +18.7% | −2.0% | +23.6% | +29.9% | −6.7% | +7.9% | −9.9% | +3.0% | −27.6% | +8.6% | +25.5% | +105% | +79.5% | +12.9% | −16.3% | −15.4% | +11.2% | +41.7% | +23.4% | +50.2% | +20.1% | +71.4% | +3.6% | +58.2% | +53.9% | +31.7% | +6.7% | +53.6% |
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | 17 of 29 | −15.7% | −6.8% | +50.0% | −49.7% | +65.9% | +89.0% | +54.1% | −0.1% | +17.0% | +41.9% | +14.0% | +9.5% | +81.3% | +46.6% | −6.4% | +7.0% | +5.5% | −5.7% | −19.8% | +108% | +1.8% | +51.2% | +43.6% | −5.2% | +11.6% | −18.4% | −11.6% | +22.4% | +7.4% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 18 of 29 | +11.8% | −1.7% | −3.4% | −17.3% | +43.5% | +43.7% | +45.6% | +18.2% | +35.0% | −0.1% | +13.8% | +13.1% | +75.8% | +43.2% | −18.8% | +16.1% | +40.0% | −40.9% | +27.4% | +50.3% | −0.2% | +19.8% | +25.3% | −15.7% | +5.6% | +98.2% | −11.4% | −61.5% | +6.7% |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 13 of 21 | +69.0% | +22.9% | −19.5% | +40.1% | +30.5% | +12.8% | +58.0% | −42.6% | +239% | −60.2% | −2.9% | +50.8% | +252% | +124% | −17.3% | −44.0% | −28.7% | −15.0% | +35.9% | +60.2% | +78.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 15 of 29 | +47.5% | −4.8% | −8.6% | +6.0% | +11.4% | +10.8% | +16.2% | −5.1% | +24.4% | +15.3% | +1.2% | +17.3% | +34.6% | +10.8% | +9.9% | −0.6% | +11.3% | −7.7% | +3.6% | +12.4% | −3.4% | +25.2% | −2.0% | −7.9% | +14.0% | +14.2% | +12.5% | +29.0% | +34.3% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 14 of 29 | +43.0% | +10.0% | −21.8% | +9.4% | −15.6% | −0.4% | +37.3% | −32.9% | −5.5% | −7.5% | +48.3% | +44.4% | +205% | +10.7% | −9.4% | +81.8% | +140% | −62.3% | +72.1% | +9.4% | −46.6% | +46.1% | +50.0% | −76.5% | −21.9% | −17.1% | +60.5% | −16.9% | +74.7% |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 12 of 29 | +9.8% | −6.3% | +1.0% | +49.4% | +1.8% | −7.2% | +22.3% | +40.0% | −1.5% | +15.0% | −3.9% | +16.9% | +26.9% | +13.1% | +9.6% | +2.9% | +26.7% | −45.3% | +37.3% | +42.8% | +4.0% | −27.7% | −11.2% | −1.2% | −36.0% | +41.8% | −7.7% | +41.6% | +35.7% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 7 of 12 | +14.7% | −15.1% | +12.9% | −27.4% | +57.5% | +16.0% | +33.0% | +18.7% | +28.7% | +10.8% | +16.6% | +27.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 11 of 29 | +15.1% | −40.9% | −6.6% | +15.4% | −2.0% | −17.5% | −1.4% | −5.5% | +12.3% | −7.4% | −9.8% | +21.4% | +91.0% | +33.0% | +64.1% | +25.3% | +12.3% | −16.3% | +15.7% | +8.6% | −32.0% | +81.5% | +10.6% | −51.9% | +9.1% | +93.0% | +318% | +36.6% | +44.7% |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 13 of 29 | +0.6% | −2.2% | −41.3% | −10.4% | +66.7% | +3.4% | −6.7% | +25.1% | +16.1% | +4.4% | +7.3% | +5.4% | +26.5% | +20.6% | +28.8% | +0.6% | +8.1% | −16.9% | −8.2% | +15.3% | −10.6% | −22.3% | +17.7% | −22.2% | −12.5% | +43.0% | −21.5% | +68.8% | +82.0% |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 15 of 29 | +38.0% | −1.2% | +0.8% | +20.4% | +17.9% | +2.9% | +37.4% | +13.9% | +35.3% | −16.7% | +0.1% | +24.6% | +32.0% | +8.6% | +6.0% | +3.5% | +20.4% | +0.3% | −17.1% | +12.7% | +36.9% | −22.0% | +38.2% | −23.2% | −7.9% | +28.7% | −5.3% | +27.0% | +31.8% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 16 of 29 | +0.4% | −0.4% | −1.2% | −19.0% | +48.6% | +45.4% | +49.5% | +11.8% | +20.0% | +73.2% | +9.3% | +11.6% | +38.3% | +19.1% | −0.1% | +25.7% | +33.0% | −35.4% | +21.3% | +30.1% | −2.7% | +25.3% | +39.7% | +9.1% | −11.7% | +41.5% | −11.0% | +72.4% | +35.2% |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +3.9% | +3.6% | +10.3% | +40.2% | −11.1% | −10.8% | +50.5% | −8.0% | +100% | −31.6% | +153% | +139% | +24.9% | −12.0% | +11.3% | +181% | −15.0% | −29.5% | −56.4% | −83.4% | +27.2% | −9.6% | +19.4% | −11.0% | +54.9% | +33.9% | +260% | −12.7% | −21.2% |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 17 of 29 | −39.2% | −15.9% | +54.8% | +22.6% | +63.5% | +23.3% | +28.7% | −11.8% | +54.3% | −36.6% | +39.3% | +16.7% | +15.3% | +44.0% | +4.1% | +79.3% | +27.2% | −19.8% | +57.4% | +51.3% | +5.6% | +34.6% | +43.5% | −27.0% | +14.4% | +39.0% | −1.9% | −7.3% | +54.9% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +9.0% | −18.9% | +21.7% | +14.2% | +30.7% | +28.7% | +0.5% | −0.7% | +2.4% | −32.4% | +32.3% | +49.0% | +60.9% | +209% | +68.8% | +35.8% | +31.7% | −24.0% | +20.3% | +26.2% | +72.7% | −37.4% | −20.6% | −34.3% | −20.2% | +177% | +72.8% | −13.8% | −46.9% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 13 of 29 | +0.1% | +15.8% | −26.1% | +19.0% | +2.9% | +0.4% | +27.7% | −12.9% | +7.7% | −13.5% | +19.3% | +14.2% | +70.0% | −3.8% | +39.4% | +8.8% | +14.8% | −6.1% | +4.8% | +19.9% | −6.2% | −7.2% | +29.1% | −52.4% | −26.2% | +17.1% | −2.8% | +42.9% | +77.1% |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 11 of 26 | −9.6% | −31.8% | −6.8% | +17.1% | +0.8% | +3.7% | −0.7% | −4.5% | +7.6% | −20.9% | +15.9% | +28.5% | +43.0% | +43.1% | +27.7% | +43.2% | +5.7% | −49.7% | +116% | +52.0% | +68.7% | −17.6% | +10.1% | −47.5% | +38.7% | −17.5% | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How AMGN has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were AMGN's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents AMGN's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: AMGN fell 53.6% from September 2005 to March 2008, while the S&P 500 rose 10.4%.
- The slowest recovery came after AMGN fell 53.6% from September 2005 to March 2008; it did not regain that peak until August 2012, four years later.
Green means AMGN fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | AMGN fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −63.5% | — | Mar 1987 | Oct 1987 | 7 months | Jun 1989 | 20 months |
| Dot-com bust | −60.2% | −35.9% | Jul 2000 | Jul 2002 | 2 years | Jul 2005 | 3 years |
| No named crash | −59.5% | — | Dec 1992 | Aug 1993 | 8 months | Jun 1995 | 22 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −53.6% | +10.4% | Sep 2005 | Mar 2008 | 2.5 years | Aug 2012 | 4.4 years |
| No named crash | −35.5% | — | Jan 1992 | Apr 1992 | 3 months | Nov 1992 | 7 months |
How did AMGN do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far AMGN, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- AMGN fell less than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when AMGN fell 31.3% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, LLY held up best, falling less than AMGN in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than AMGN.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMGN This pageAmgen Inc. | — | −1.2% | −11.9% | −18.3% | −14.3% | −7.4% | −22.1% | −12.6% | −0.5% | −31.3% | −60.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 7 of 10 | −0.6% | −11.7% | −16.9% | −10.2% | −8.6% | −19.6% | −10.9% | 0.0% | −50.0% | −54.3% |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 3 of 10 | −0.9% | −10.5% | −32.1% | −20.7% | −6.5% | −30.8% | −14.2% | −3.5% | −57.7% | −39.4% |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 1 of 6 | −1.5% | −21.9% | −32.1% | −18.1% | −5.8% | −29.8% | — | — | — | — |
| UTHR United Therapeutics Corporation | 1 of 10 | −1.8% | −22.3% | −31.2% | −21.2% | −5.3% | −31.3% | −35.1% | −3.5% | −57.8% | −93.2% |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 1 of 10 | 0.0% | −19.2% | −19.4% | −21.2% | −8.8% | −43.7% | −23.9% | −2.7% | −59.9% | −86.7% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −1.6% | −20.0% | −13.7% | −22.7% | −5.5% | −28.7% | −18.2% | −2.1% | −34.3% | −53.6% |
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −1.6% | −44.2% | −26.2% | −24.9% | −8.5% | −14.6% | −23.1% | −1.5% | −45.1% | −41.9% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 2 of 10 | −2.4% | −19.8% | −24.8% | −17.2% | −8.7% | −14.7% | −24.4% | −3.6% | −53.9% | −41.8% |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −4.1% | −28.9% | −30.0% | −33.7% | −6.9% | −48.9% | −39.3% | −1.5% | −58.6% | — |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 3 of 10 | −1.1% | −12.7% | −25.4% | −16.9% | −8.2% | −9.0% | −9.8% | −0.1% | −34.4% | −35.9% |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 1 of 10 | −2.4% | −20.4% | −23.7% | −16.4% | −4.8% | −50.2% | −32.9% | −4.5% | −83.5% | −97.1% |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 5 of 10 | −2.4% | −10.8% | −19.3% | −9.7% | −6.6% | −18.2% | −17.4% | −2.3% | −63.3% | −57.5% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 1 of 6 | −6.8% | −35.9% | −48.9% | −19.2% | −5.3% | −28.7% | — | — | — | — |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 0 of 10 | −2.5% | −22.4% | −21.2% | −21.7% | −9.3% | −24.6% | −19.4% | −0.6% | −52.7% | −59.8% |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 3 of 10 | −1.8% | −24.6% | −21.8% | −12.3% | −8.1% | −18.2% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −49.8% | −46.0% |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 5 of 10 | −0.5% | −25.7% | −22.6% | −11.4% | −6.4% | −18.0% | −16.4% | −1.1% | −37.4% | −43.5% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 3 of 10 | −3.2% | −22.8% | −25.9% | −13.4% | −9.8% | −14.0% | −21.8% | −0.6% | −45.7% | −33.7% |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −3.5% | −24.3% | −27.9% | −45.1% | −5.7% | −44.1% | −32.8% | −7.1% | −83.0% | −65.8% |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 3 of 10 | −1.1% | −21.4% | −23.7% | −13.8% | −3.9% | −20.8% | −23.1% | −1.7% | −40.9% | −51.0% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −0.2% | −25.8% | −12.7% | −17.3% | −7.3% | −37.7% | −23.2% | −7.2% | −49.9% | −71.6% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 4 of 10 | −2.3% | −16.0% | −29.4% | −22.9% | −4.1% | −16.3% | −10.5% | 0.0% | −39.2% | −69.5% |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 0 of 10 | −4.5% | −22.9% | −26.3% | −24.4% | −11.6% | −53.6% | −23.1% | −4.1% | −74.9% | −89.7% |
How closely does AMGN move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares AMGN with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, AMGN captured 74% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 64% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.54. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- LLY took just 6% of the S&P 500's losses, against 64% for AMGN, while still keeping 101% of its gains.
- Nine of the 22 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than AMGN's 1.16, led by LLY, MCK and VRTX.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than AMGN's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMGN This pageAmgen Inc. | 74% | 64% | 1.16 | 0.54 |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 101% | 6% | 15.73 | 0.37 |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 72% | 27% | 2.71 | 0.56 |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated | 87% | 50% | 1.75 | 0.46 |
| UTHR United Therapeutics Corporation | 75% | 45% | 1.66 | 0.52 |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 92% | 57% | 1.62 | 0.54 |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 60% | 39% | 1.52 | 0.39 |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 52% | 36% | 1.44 | 0.35 |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 64% | 46% | 1.39 | 0.30 |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 64% | 53% | 1.20 | 0.46 |
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | 107% | 99% | 1.09 | 1.08 |
| NBIX Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 69% | 66% | 1.04 | 0.56 |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 84% | 84% | 1.01 | 0.75 |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 104% | 104% | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 92% | 93% | 0.99 | 0.73 |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 55% | 66% | 0.84 | 0.19 |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 75% | 94% | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 128% | 167% | 0.77 | 1.31 |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 55% | 75% | 0.73 | 0.41 |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 52% | 81% | 0.65 | 0.54 |
| INCY Incyte Corporation | 52% | 87% | 0.60 | 0.77 |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 35% | 91% | 0.38 | 0.28 |
| BMRN BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. | 20% | 70% | 0.29 | 0.38 |
What diversifies AMGN?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with AMGN's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing AMGN with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in AMGN into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+18.3% for AMGN alone, +20.5% for the mix).
- FIX made money in eight of the ten calendar years in which AMGN lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and SMH have moved largely independently of AMGN over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.43 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which AMGN lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% AMGN and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2020 | 2016 | 2010 | 2009 | 2007 | 2006 | 2002 | 2001 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMGN Amgen Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +145% | 0.85 | −6.8% | −2.0% | −7.6% | −3.0% | −2.0% | −32.0% | −13.4% | −14.4% | −11.7% | −0.4% | 24.8% | +18.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.34 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +3.9% | +1.1% | −1.8% | +2.0% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | 20.8% | +20.5% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.43 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | −13.4% | +29.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.2% | +18.2% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.05 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +55.5% | +35.6% | +19.0% | +60.5% | +6.0% | −6.7% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 21.4% | +23.5% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.45 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | +2.1% | +6.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.9% | +17.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.22 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | +24.8% | +8.0% | +29.3% | +24.0% | +30.4% | +22.6% | — | — | — | 20.9% | +18.9% |
| DIVO Dividend & IncomeAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 0.48 | +69.0% | 0.95 | +16.2% | +12.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.1% | +17.3% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.22 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +28.2% | +7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.1% | +19.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.45 | +177% | 0.93 | +5.6% | −32.7% | +28.0% | +21.9% | +21.8% | +36.8% | +18.0% | −14.8% | −18.2% | — | 22.7% | +19.9% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2020 | 2016 | 2010 | 2009 | 2007 | 2006 | 2002 | 2001 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMGN Amgen Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +145% | 0.85 | −6.8% | −2.0% | −7.6% | −3.0% | −2.0% | −32.0% | −13.4% | −14.4% | −11.7% | −0.4% | 24.8% | +18.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.29 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +10.1% | −17.5% | +21.4% | −4.4% | −9.8% | −5.8% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +29.1% | 21.9% | +22.8% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.06 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | −2.4% | +7.4% | +2.8% | +105% | −25.7% | −26.0% | −65.1% | −25.6% | — | 23.6% | +36.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | -0.02 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +6.7% | +18.3% | +8.7% | +17.8% | +2.1% | +38.9% | −9.4% | +73.7% | — | 21.6% | +32.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.38 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +27.1% | −28.3% | +13.8% | +62.9% | +29.7% | −1.2% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +96.3% | 22.2% | +22.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.38 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | −27.4% | +0.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.1% | +24.8% |
Common questions
What was AMGN's worst drawdown?
AMGN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 63.5%, from March to October 1987. It took 20 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were AMGN's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, AMGN's best year was 1999, when it returned 130%. Its worst was 2007, with a return of -32.0%.
Is there a better investment than AMGN?
Among AMGN's popular alternatives, ABBV earned more than AMGN with less volatility over the past 5 years: 26.1% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 19.6% a year at 24.9%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, EXEL (biotechnology) was ahead of AMGN in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (35.8% volatility against 24.9%).
Is AMGN more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. AMGN's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.9%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AMGN's return lands within 24.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is AMGN's Sharpe ratio?
AMGN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.85, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AMGN earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is AMGN with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, AMGN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.26 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AMGN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AMGN holding.
What are the best alternatives to AMGN?
None of the 22 popular alternatives we compared outperformed AMGN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about AMGN's strength than about its alternatives.
Did AMGN outperform the S&P 500?
AMGN finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +29.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did AMGN do in stock market crashes?
AMGN fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in seven of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when AMGN fell 31.3% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies AMGN?
These had a low correlation with AMGN over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.34), EMLP (correlation 0.43) and SMH (correlation 0.05); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.29), CLS (correlation 0.06) and FIX (correlation -0.02). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than AMGN's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of AMGN's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.