Relative Intelligence · Pharmaceuticals

How Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on MRK alone. It places MRK (Merck & Co., Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where MRK stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: MRK's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowMRK has run far ahead of the market, rising 28.3% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its pharmaceutical peers split over the past 6 months: ABBV (AbbVie) rose 43.8%, while AZN (AstraZeneca) fell 15.3%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?More than an industry move: MRK rose 19.9% over the past 3 months, against 5.0% for the pharmaceuticals ETF IHE (iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF). The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its pharmaceutical peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: TEVA (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries) rose 31.8%, while JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) rose 4.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, MRK rose 76.8% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. On the flip side, the last two calendar years both went the same way: MRK rose 9.8% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termMRK turned $10,000 into $34,100 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: MRK rose 113% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the Covid crash, MRK fell 19.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than LLY (Eli Lilly and Company, 16.9%) but less than JNJ (Johnson & Johnson, 25.4%). MRK fell less than the S&P 500 in two of the last three sell-offs, including the Covid crash (19.3% against 33.7%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, MRK has a correlation of 0.13 over 5 years, less closely than 93% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. Over 10 years, MRK's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.30: 64% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 46% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- COR (Cencora, health care distribution) earned more than MRK with less volatility over the past 5 years: 24.2% a year at 22.8% volatility, against 16.3% a year at 24.8%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 40 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MRK with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT (Walmart), ABBV (AbbVie) and COST (Costco Wholesale).
How much would $10,000 in MRK have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in MRK over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of MRK over the same span and MRK's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in MRK at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $82,561 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Six of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of MRK, and GILD finished highest, at $1,571,438.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 603 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MRK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- GILD$2M+15,614% total · +19.1% a year
- AMGN$526,909+5,169% total · +14.6% a year
- LLY$396,376+3,864% total · +13.5% a year
- TMO$235,386+2,254% total · +11.5% a year
- MCK$208,304+1,983% total · +11.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- NVS$105,143+951% total · +8.5% a year
- MRK$82,561+726% total · +7.6% a year
- TEVA$76,156+662% total · +7.3% a year
- VTRS$23,883+139% total · +3.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 633 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MRK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- MCK$43,941+339% total · +34.5% a year
- TEVA$40,657+307% total · +32.4% a year
- ABBV$29,134+191% total · +23.8% a year
- GILD$25,496+155% total · +20.6% a year
- AMGN$23,160+132% total · +18.3% a year
- MRK$22,538+125% total · +17.6% a year
- NVS$21,146+111% total · +16.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- TMO$11,986+19.9% total · +3.7% a year
MRK at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- MRK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 68.6%, from December 2000 to March 2009. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, MRK's best was 2022, when it returned 49.4%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 45.3%. It lost money in ten of those years.
- MRK is 4.7% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $366B
- Industry
- Drug Manufacturers - General
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +76.8%total return
- Past 3 years
- +58.3%+16.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- +113%+16.3% a year
- Past 10 years
- +241%+13.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +49.4%2022
- Worst calendar year
- −45.3%2008
- Losing years
- 10 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 24.8%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.74return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −68.6%Dec 2000 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −4.7%below the peak
MRK against the whole market
Where MRK ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does MRK rank among all stocks?
This section ranks MRK on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how MRK stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- MRK's 1-year return ranks in the top 9% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | MRK | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +76.8% | 294 of 3,287 | top 9% |
| 3-year return | +58.3% | 1,423 of 3,017 | top 47% |
| 5-year return | +113% | 615 of 2,893 | top 21% |
| 10-year return | +241% | 738 of 2,202 | top 34% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 24.8% | 306 of 2,893 | top 11% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.74 | 388 of 2,893 | top 13% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −43.4% | 240 of 2,187 | top 11% |
What has beaten MRK on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). MRK sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than MRK with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 16 stocks and 24 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than MRK over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half MRK's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 23% less than MRK's 24.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.74 for MRK.
- Among MRK's popular alternatives, ABBV is in the region. ABBV earned 26.1% a year against 16.3% a year for MRK, at 23.4% volatility, 5% less than MRK's 24.8%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to MRK; faint dots are 20 more of the 40 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× MRK's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than MRK?
Investments that beat MRK over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among MRK's popular alternatives, ABBV earned more than MRK with less volatility over the past 5 years: 26.1% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 16.3% a year at 24.8%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, COR (health care distribution) earned more than MRK with less volatility over the past 5 years: 24.2% a year at 22.8% volatility, against 16.3% a year at 24.8%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 40 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MRK with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT, ABBV and COST.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat MRK over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks MRK's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than MRK follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than MRK's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× MRK's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than MRK's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with MRK?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.13 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against MRK. 7 of 22 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.19 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.39 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.27 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +32.2% | 42.8% | 0.86 | −85.5% | −3.6% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 5 shownEverything else in Pharmaceuticals and the categories next to it (Biotechnology, Health Care Distribution, Life Sciences Tools, Medical Devices), plus MRK's specific themes. 5 of 106 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.33 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatility | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.26 | — | ||
EXELExelixis, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return in most periods | +24.4% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | +448% | 0.09 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +2.6% | 30.6% | 0.24 | −43.2% | +306% | 0.27 | — | ||
ITGRInteger Holdings Corporation · Medical Devices | Higher return in most periods | +6.9% | 35.3% | 0.37 | −56.1% | +557% | 0.24 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 107 of 3,505 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.19 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.08 | 0.40% | ||
SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.15 | 0.13% | |
CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.31 | 0.61% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.27 | — | ||
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.35 | 0.40% | |
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.28 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for MRK
- Annual return
- MRK returned 16.3% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $21,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- MRK's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.8%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MRK's return lands within 24.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- MRK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.74, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MRK earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- MRK's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 43.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 43.4% fall takes a 76.8% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, MRK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.13 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MRK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MRK holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 40 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than MRK with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 28 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with MRK | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.19 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.08 | 0.40% | |
| 3 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.15 | 0.13% |
| 4 | Same or nearby category | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.33 | — | |
| 5 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.31 | 0.61% |
| 6 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.27 | — | |
| 7 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.29 | 0.45% |
| 8 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.37 | 0.48% |
| 9 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.01 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.15 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.17 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 0.21 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.16 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.08 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.38 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.17 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.24 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.04 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.30 | — | |
| 20 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.22 | 0.80% |
| 21 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.27 | — |
| 22 | Popular alternative | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.27 | — | |
| 23 | MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy | Whole market | +18.6% | 19.7% | 0.97 | −64.6% | +186% | 0.28 | 0.45% |
| 24 | IXCiShares Global Energy ETF · International | Whole market | +20.7% | 23.2% | 0.93 | −64.2% | +183% | 0.34 | 0.37% |
| 25 | EUFNiShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF · Financial Sector Equity | Whole market | +18.5% | 21.8% | 0.89 | −53.2% | +233% | 0.21 | 0.49% |
| 26 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.5% | 22.5% | 0.83 | −31.4% | — | 0.05 | 0.15% |
| 27 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.27 | 0.95% |
| 28 | NANRState Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.6% | 0.83 | −49.1% | +241% | 0.36 | 0.35% |
MRK against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against MRK, compared period by period and year by year.
How do MRK's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at MRK, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only ABBV and NVS were both more rewarding and calmer than MRK over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- 12 of the 22 popular alternatives earned less than MRK over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, MRK returned 16.3% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (24.8% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than MRK with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | +40.7% | 32.8% |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | +38.7% | 25.0% |
| TEVA Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited | +32.2% | 42.8% |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | +26.1% | 23.4% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | +22.8% | 24.9% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | +19.6% | 24.9% |
| NVS Novartis AG | +17.2% | 20.7% |
| MRK This pageMerck & Co., Inc. | +16.3% | 24.8% |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | +12.7% | 17.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| TAK Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | +11.8% | 19.4% |
| VTRS Viatris Inc. | +10.4% | 33.6% |
| GSK GSK plc | +9.5% | 24.5% |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | +8.7% | 35.7% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +7.7% | 31.1% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | +5.5% | 24.9% |
| XBI State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | +4.6% | 32.5% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | +2.9% | 27.8% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | +1.3% | 34.7% |
| SNY Sanofi | +0.6% | 25.3% |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | −1.7% | 25.4% |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | −1.8% | 34.7% |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | −4.0% | 39.1% |
| ZTS Zoetis Inc. | −16.3% | 29.6% |
Has MRK consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares MRK with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than MRK helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 22 popular alternatives, TEVA, outperformed MRK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- MCK, LLY and GILD earned more for the risk they took than MRK (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than MRK over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. (this page) | — | −0.8% | +19.9% | +28.3% | +42.2% | +76.8% | +58.3% | +113% | +241% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | — | $366B | — |
| TEVA QualifiedTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited | 3/5 short2/3 long | +2.0% | +31.8% | +27.6% | +32.0% | +110% | +403% | +303% | −3.6% | 42.8% | 0.86 | −85.5% | — | $48B | — |
| LLY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralEli Lilly and Company | 2/5 short3/3 long | +10.2% | +12.1% | +40.0% | +19.4% | +59.7% | +124% | +451% | +1,807% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | — | $1.2T | — |
| ABBV Drug Manufacturers - GeneralAbbVie Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +9.9% | +14.8% | +43.8% | +29.8% | +28.3% | +118% | +218% | +603% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | — | $511B | — |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 2/5 short3/3 long | +16.2% | +24.0% | +20.2% | +25.5% | +31.3% | +131% | +413% | +586% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | — | $120B | — |
| AMGN Drug Manufacturers - GeneralAmgen Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +11.6% | +21.2% | +27.0% | +36.7% | +48.7% | +72.2% | +145% | +266% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | — | $237B | — |
| NVS Drug Manufacturers - GeneralNovartis AG | 1/5 short2/3 long | +9.0% | +2.7% | +1.8% | +13.1% | +18.8% | +75.9% | +121% | +226% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | — | $292B | — |
| GILD Drug Manufacturers - GeneralGilead Sciences, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | +4.0% | +18.2% | +16.6% | +31.0% | +30.3% | +121% | +180% | +200% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | — | $194B | — |
| TMO Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchThermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +4.3% | +30.7% | +30.9% | +16.3% | +26.8% | +49.5% | +15.1% | +366% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | — | $254B | — |
| VTRS Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericViatris Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +9.1% | +10.6% | +27.3% | +53.1% | +87.1% | +127% | +64.3% | −38.0% | 33.6% | 0.47 | −82.0% | — | $21B | — |
| IQV Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchIQVIA Holdings Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −0.8% | +31.4% | +51.5% | +18.8% | +26.3% | +45.3% | +6.5% | +260% | 34.7% | 0.21 | −51.5% | — | $44B | — |
| AZN Drug Manufacturers - GeneralAstraZeneca PLC | 1/5 short1/3 long | +0.4% | +3.3% | −15.3% | −7.0% | +1.8% | +38.8% | +52.1% | +257% | 35.7% | 0.41 | −28.7% | — | $262B | — |
| JNJ Drug Manufacturers - GeneralJohnson & Johnson | 0/5 short1/3 long | −3.8% | +4.8% | +13.6% | +27.1% | +36.9% | +84.6% | +82.1% | +196% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | — | $625B | — |
| XBI HealthcareState Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −3.2% | +1.5% | +11.3% | +26.2% | +39.7% | +130% | +25.1% | +159% | 32.5% | 0.30 | −63.9% | 0.35% | $10B | — |
| BIIB Drug Manufacturers - GeneralBiogen Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +11.0% | +21.6% | +32.6% | +36.7% | +65.8% | −5.6% | −8.8% | −18.9% | 34.7% | 0.11 | −72.7% | — | $36B | — |
| PFE Drug Manufacturers - GeneralPfizer Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +8.5% | +23.8% | +13.2% | +25.7% | +30.5% | +19.2% | −8.3% | +55.0% | 25.4% | 0.06 | −58.9% | — | $172B | — |
| REGN BiotechnologyRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +1.2% | +20.3% | +8.0% | +4.4% | +40.7% | +0.8% | +44.9% | +120% | 31.1% | 0.40 | −59.7% | — | $83B | — |
| ZTS Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericZoetis Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +12.2% | +5.0% | −34.3% | −35.4% | −43.8% | −50.1% | −59.0% | +70.3% | 29.6% | -0.45 | −70.5% | — | $33B | — |
| TAK Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericTakeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | 1/5 short0/3 long | +8.6% | +20.3% | +16.9% | +33.6% | +48.2% | +56.1% | +75.1% | +30.4% | 19.4% | 0.68 | −54.4% | — | $64B | — |
| NVO Drug Manufacturers - GeneralNovo Nordisk A/S | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.1% | −20.0% | −1.5% | −23.9% | −28.5% | −57.0% | −18.5% | +134% | 39.1% | 0.09 | −75.2% | — | $174B | — |
| GSK Drug Manufacturers - GeneralGSK plc | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.9% | +2.1% | −10.1% | +4.7% | +18.9% | +60.0% | +57.2% | +95.1% | 24.5% | 0.49 | −37.6% | — | $102B | — |
| BMY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralBristol-Myers Squibb Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.5% | +3.6% | +6.6% | +19.1% | +47.8% | +25.8% | +30.6% | +74.8% | 24.9% | 0.34 | −47.7% | — | $126B | — |
| SNY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralSanofi | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.6% | −5.9% | −10.3% | −10.7% | −13.4% | −10.0% | +3.0% | +61.5% | 25.3% | 0.15 | −33.5% | — | $99B | — |
How did MRK do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where MRK ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with MRK and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- MRK finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 11 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, MCK came out ahead of MRK most often, in 22 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, MRK finished in the top quarter in six of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in six. In 2025, it ranked 16 of 23.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of MRK; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places MRK among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of MRK | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRK This pageMerck & Co., Inc. | — | +9.8% | −6.3% | +1.0% | +49.4% | +1.8% | −7.2% | +22.3% | +40.0% | −1.5% | +15.0% | −3.9% | +16.9% | +26.9% | +13.1% | +9.6% | +2.9% | +26.7% | −45.3% | +37.3% | +42.8% | +4.0% | −27.7% | −11.2% | −1.2% | −36.0% | +41.8% | −7.7% | +41.6% | +35.7% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 29 | 16 of 23 | 17 of 23 | 14 of 23 | 2 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 21 of 23 | 12 of 23 | 2 of 23 | 21 of 23 | 2 of 23 | 18 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 15 of 21 | 14 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 13 of 20 | 8 of 20 | 19 of 19 | 4 of 19 | 3 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 16 of 18 | 17 of 18 | 4 of 17 | 17 of 17 | 9 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 7 of 17 | 10 of 17 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 17 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| TEVA Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited | 16 of 29 | +41.6% | +111% | +14.5% | +13.9% | −17.0% | −1.5% | −36.4% | −18.6% | −46.0% | −43.2% | +16.7% | +47.4% | +10.9% | −5.1% | −21.0% | −5.9% | +33.6% | −7.4% | +50.9% | −27.1% | +45.2% | +6.1% | +47.8% | +26.1% | −15.5% | +105% | +77.0% | −13.4% | −5.3% |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 16 of 29 | +40.3% | +33.3% | +60.9% | +34.3% | +66.1% | +31.0% | +16.2% | +40.5% | +17.8% | −10.4% | +25.4% | +39.8% | +7.3% | +24.2% | +25.2% | +3.6% | −6.2% | −21.3% | +5.7% | −5.2% | +2.6% | −17.6% | +13.1% | −17.6% | −14.4% | +41.9% | −24.3% | +29.1% | +93.6% |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 7 of 13 | +33.1% | +18.9% | −0.2% | +24.0% | +32.4% | +27.7% | +1.5% | −1.0% | +60.1% | +9.8% | −6.5% | +27.9% | +60.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 22 of 29 | +44.5% | +23.7% | +24.1% | +51.8% | +44.2% | +27.1% | +26.7% | −28.4% | +12.0% | −28.3% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +67.7% | +25.6% | +11.8% | +13.8% | +62.9% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −1.2% | +64.9% | −1.4% | +19.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | −71.3% | +46.9% | +96.3% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 17 of 29 | +29.7% | −6.8% | +13.5% | +20.4% | +0.9% | −2.0% | +27.6% | +15.2% | +22.3% | −7.6% | +4.0% | +42.3% | +34.8% | +36.8% | +18.2% | −3.0% | −2.0% | +24.3% | −32.0% | −13.4% | +22.9% | +3.8% | +27.8% | −14.4% | −11.7% | +6.5% | +130% | +93.3% | −0.4% |
| NVS Novartis AG | 17 of 29 | +46.0% | −0.5% | +21.1% | +6.6% | −5.0% | +2.2% | +29.1% | +6.2% | +19.8% | −11.8% | −4.3% | +19.4% | +32.2% | +16.1% | +1.5% | +12.6% | +14.6% | −5.4% | −3.4% | +11.3% | +6.0% | +12.3% | +27.5% | +2.1% | −17.2% | +30.6% | −24.1% | +21.9% | +52.9% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 19 of 29 | +36.6% | +18.7% | −2.0% | +23.6% | +29.9% | −6.7% | +7.9% | −9.9% | +3.0% | −27.6% | +8.6% | +25.5% | +105% | +79.5% | +12.9% | −16.3% | −15.4% | +11.2% | +41.7% | +23.4% | +50.2% | +20.1% | +71.4% | +3.6% | +58.2% | +53.9% | +31.7% | +6.7% | +53.6% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 17 of 29 | +11.8% | −1.7% | −3.4% | −17.3% | +43.5% | +43.7% | +45.6% | +18.2% | +35.0% | −0.1% | +13.8% | +13.1% | +75.8% | +43.2% | −18.8% | +16.1% | +40.0% | −40.9% | +27.4% | +50.3% | −0.2% | +19.8% | +25.3% | −15.7% | +5.6% | +98.2% | −11.4% | −61.5% | +6.7% |
| VTRS Viatris Inc. | 13 of 29 | +5.0% | +19.7% | +2.0% | −14.3% | −26.2% | −6.8% | −26.6% | −35.2% | +10.9% | −29.4% | −4.1% | +29.9% | +58.1% | +27.9% | +1.6% | +14.6% | +86.4% | −29.7% | −29.1% | +1.1% | +14.2% | −29.6% | +63.5% | −6.4% | +49.9% | +0.7% | −19.5% | +51.3% | +27.1% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 8 of 12 | +14.7% | −15.1% | +12.9% | −27.4% | +57.5% | +16.0% | +33.0% | +18.7% | +28.7% | +10.8% | +16.6% | +27.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 16 of 29 | +38.0% | −1.2% | +0.8% | +20.4% | +17.9% | +2.9% | +37.4% | +13.9% | +35.3% | −16.7% | +0.1% | +24.6% | +32.0% | +8.6% | +6.0% | +3.5% | +20.4% | +0.3% | −17.1% | +12.7% | +36.9% | −22.0% | +38.2% | −23.2% | −7.9% | +28.7% | −5.3% | +27.0% | +31.8% |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 12 of 29 | +47.5% | −4.8% | −8.6% | +6.0% | +11.4% | +10.8% | +16.2% | −5.1% | +24.4% | +15.3% | +1.2% | +17.3% | +34.6% | +10.8% | +9.9% | −0.6% | +11.3% | −7.7% | +3.6% | +12.4% | −3.4% | +25.2% | −2.0% | −7.9% | +14.0% | +14.2% | +12.5% | +29.0% | +34.3% |
| XBI State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 12 of 19 | +35.9% | +1.0% | +7.6% | −25.9% | −20.4% | +48.3% | +32.6% | −15.3% | +43.8% | −15.4% | +13.6% | +45.0% | +48.4% | +32.7% | +5.2% | +17.6% | +0.4% | −8.5% | +29.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 14 of 29 | +15.1% | −40.9% | −6.6% | +15.4% | −2.0% | −17.5% | −1.4% | −5.5% | +12.3% | −7.4% | −9.8% | +21.4% | +91.0% | +33.0% | +64.1% | +25.3% | +12.3% | −16.3% | +15.7% | +8.6% | −32.0% | +81.5% | +10.6% | −51.9% | +9.1% | +93.0% | +318% | +36.6% | +44.7% |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 13 of 29 | +0.6% | −2.2% | −41.3% | −10.4% | +66.7% | +3.4% | −6.7% | +25.1% | +16.1% | +4.4% | +7.3% | +5.4% | +26.5% | +20.6% | +28.8% | +0.6% | +8.1% | −16.9% | −8.2% | +15.3% | −10.6% | −22.3% | +17.7% | −22.2% | −12.5% | +43.0% | −21.5% | +68.8% | +82.0% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 16 of 29 | +9.0% | −18.9% | +21.7% | +14.2% | +30.7% | +28.7% | +0.5% | −0.7% | +2.4% | −32.4% | +32.3% | +49.0% | +60.9% | +209% | +68.8% | +35.8% | +31.7% | −24.0% | +20.3% | +26.2% | +72.7% | −37.4% | −20.6% | −34.3% | −20.2% | +177% | +72.8% | −13.8% | −46.9% |
| ZTS Zoetis Inc. | 7 of 12 | −21.8% | −16.6% | +35.9% | −39.5% | +48.3% | +25.8% | +55.7% | +19.5% | +35.6% | +12.7% | +12.1% | +32.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TAK Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | 6 of 17 | +22.7% | −3.2% | −4.8% | +20.1% | −21.6% | −3.0% | +22.1% | −38.8% | +41.3% | −14.0% | +24.4% | −6.5% | +7.4% | +5.8% | −5.0% | +21.2% | −16.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 17 of 29 | −39.2% | −15.9% | +54.8% | +22.6% | +63.5% | +23.3% | +28.7% | −11.8% | +54.3% | −36.6% | +39.3% | +16.7% | +15.3% | +44.0% | +4.1% | +79.3% | +27.2% | −19.8% | +57.4% | +51.3% | +5.6% | +34.6% | +43.5% | −27.0% | +14.4% | +39.0% | −1.9% | −7.3% | +54.9% |
| GSK GSK plc | 15 of 29 | +51.3% | −5.2% | +9.8% | −16.8% | +27.1% | −17.7% | +29.2% | +13.8% | −3.0% | +2.1% | −0.3% | −15.7% | +28.9% | +0.6% | +22.7% | −2.1% | +19.2% | −22.2% | −0.8% | +7.9% | +9.9% | +5.6% | +28.8% | −21.6% | −9.7% | +4.1% | −17.9% | +48.2% | +55.8% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 16 of 29 | +0.1% | +15.8% | −26.1% | +19.0% | +2.9% | +0.4% | +27.7% | −12.9% | +7.7% | −13.5% | +19.3% | +14.2% | +70.0% | −3.8% | +39.4% | +8.8% | +14.8% | −6.1% | +4.8% | +19.9% | −6.2% | −7.2% | +29.1% | −52.4% | −26.2% | +17.1% | −2.8% | +42.9% | +77.1% |
| SNY Sanofi | 13 of 23 | +4.9% | +1.1% | +6.5% | +0.5% | +7.0% | +0.4% | +20.5% | +6.0% | +9.9% | −1.2% | −3.4% | −11.9% | +17.1% | +36.0% | +18.8% | −13.4% | +28.7% | −26.5% | +1.0% | +7.2% | +11.6% | +8.2% | +26.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How MRK has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were MRK's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents MRK's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of MRK's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: MRK fell 43.4% from June 2024 to May 2025, while the S&P 500 rose 9.3%.
- The slowest recovery came after MRK fell 68.6% from December 2000 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until February 2014, five years later.
Green means MRK fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | MRK fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −68.6% | −41.3% | Dec 2000 | Mar 2009 | 8.3 years | Feb 2014 | 4.9 years |
| No named crash | −47.2% | — | Jan 1992 | Aug 1993 | 19 months | Jul 1995 | 23 months |
| No named crash | −43.4% | +9.3% | Jun 2024 | May 2025 | 11 months | Jun 2026 | 13 months |
| No named crash | −36.5% | +6.3% | Mar 1999 | Mar 2000 | 12 months | Oct 2000 | 7 months |
| No named crash | −32.8% | — | Sep 1987 | Jan 1988 | 4 months | May 1989 | 16 months |
How did MRK do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far MRK, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, LLY held up best, falling less than MRK in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- MRK fell less than the S&P 500 in four of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when MRK fell 19.3% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than MRK.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRK This pageMerck & Co., Inc. | — | −2.4% | −10.8% | −19.3% | −9.7% | −6.6% | −18.2% | −17.4% | −2.3% | −63.3% | −57.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| TEVA Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited | 2 of 10 | −7.4% | −34.0% | −50.3% | −40.1% | −10.7% | −21.8% | −25.8% | −2.4% | −23.5% | −34.7% |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 6 of 10 | −0.6% | −11.7% | −16.9% | −10.2% | −8.6% | −19.6% | −10.9% | 0.0% | −50.0% | −54.3% |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 2 of 6 | −1.5% | −21.9% | −32.1% | −18.1% | −5.8% | −29.8% | — | — | — | — |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 4 of 10 | −0.9% | −10.5% | −32.1% | −20.7% | −6.5% | −30.8% | −14.2% | −3.5% | −57.7% | −39.4% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 5 of 10 | −1.2% | −11.9% | −18.3% | −14.3% | −7.4% | −22.1% | −12.6% | −0.5% | −31.3% | −60.2% |
| NVS Novartis AG | 4 of 10 | −1.1% | −20.4% | −25.5% | −9.9% | −6.6% | −30.1% | −14.5% | −2.6% | −41.7% | −25.7% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −1.6% | −20.0% | −13.7% | −22.7% | −5.5% | −28.7% | −18.2% | −2.1% | −34.3% | −53.6% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 3 of 10 | −2.4% | −19.8% | −24.8% | −17.2% | −8.7% | −14.7% | −24.4% | −3.6% | −53.9% | −41.8% |
| VTRS Viatris Inc. | 2 of 10 | −6.9% | −43.3% | −37.3% | −32.8% | −6.8% | −31.9% | −32.4% | −0.1% | −64.4% | −47.3% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 1 of 6 | −6.8% | −35.9% | −48.9% | −19.2% | −5.3% | −28.7% | — | — | — | — |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 5 of 10 | −0.5% | −25.7% | −22.6% | −11.4% | −6.4% | −18.0% | −16.4% | −1.1% | −37.4% | −43.5% |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 6 of 10 | −1.1% | −12.7% | −25.4% | −16.9% | −8.2% | −9.0% | −9.8% | −0.1% | −34.4% | −35.9% |
| XBI State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 2 of 9 | −6.9% | −43.6% | −32.9% | −32.5% | −5.5% | −42.6% | −26.7% | −4.1% | −37.5% | — |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 2 of 10 | −2.5% | −22.4% | −21.2% | −21.7% | −9.3% | −24.6% | −19.4% | −0.6% | −52.7% | −59.8% |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 5 of 10 | −1.8% | −24.6% | −21.8% | −12.3% | −8.1% | −18.2% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −49.8% | −46.0% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −0.2% | −25.8% | −12.7% | −17.3% | −7.3% | −37.7% | −23.2% | −7.2% | −49.9% | −71.6% |
| ZTS Zoetis Inc. | 0 of 6 | −4.2% | −34.9% | −35.7% | −16.7% | −6.9% | −18.9% | — | — | — | — |
| TAK Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | 3 of 8 | −0.6% | −14.8% | −31.5% | −27.9% | −6.5% | −17.0% | −5.6% | −3.7% | — | — |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 5 of 10 | −1.1% | −21.4% | −23.7% | −13.8% | −3.9% | −20.8% | −23.1% | −1.7% | −40.9% | −51.0% |
| GSK GSK plc | 6 of 10 | −0.3% | −37.6% | −26.5% | −11.5% | −4.3% | −15.7% | −12.4% | −2.0% | −46.6% | −45.1% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 5 of 10 | −2.3% | −16.0% | −29.4% | −22.9% | −4.1% | −16.3% | −10.5% | 0.0% | −39.2% | −69.5% |
| SNY Sanofi | 3 of 9 | −0.5% | −33.5% | −25.2% | −9.0% | −9.8% | −30.2% | −20.7% | −2.8% | −46.6% | — |
How closely does MRK move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares MRK with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, MRK captured 64% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 46% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.30. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- LLY took just 6% of the S&P 500's losses, against 46% for MRK, while still keeping 101% of its gains.
- Five of the 22 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than MRK's 1.39, led by LLY, MCK and ABBV.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than MRK's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRK This pageMerck & Co., Inc. | 64% | 46% | 1.39 | 0.30 |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 101% | 6% | 15.73 | 0.37 |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 72% | 27% | 2.71 | 0.56 |
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 92% | 57% | 1.62 | 0.54 |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 60% | 39% | 1.52 | 0.39 |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 52% | 36% | 1.44 | 0.35 |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 64% | 53% | 1.20 | 0.46 |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 74% | 64% | 1.16 | 0.54 |
| NVS Novartis AG | 69% | 64% | 1.08 | 0.49 |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 104% | 104% | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 55% | 66% | 0.84 | 0.19 |
| GSK GSK plc | 51% | 61% | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 75% | 94% | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 128% | 167% | 0.77 | 1.31 |
| XBI State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 93% | 122% | 0.76 | 1.01 |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 55% | 75% | 0.73 | 0.41 |
| SNY Sanofi | 53% | 74% | 0.72 | 0.46 |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 52% | 81% | 0.65 | 0.54 |
| ZTS Zoetis Inc. | 64% | 101% | 0.64 | 0.72 |
| TAK Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | 34% | 58% | 0.58 | 0.44 |
| TEVA Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited | 55% | 116% | 0.48 | 1.11 |
| VTRS Viatris Inc. | 74% | 179% | 0.41 | 1.14 |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 35% | 91% | 0.38 | 0.28 |
What diversifies MRK?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with MRK's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing MRK with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in MRK into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+17.6% for MRK alone, +18.5% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of MRK over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.37 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in seven of the ten calendar years in which MRK lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which MRK lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% MRK and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2020 | 2017 | 2015 | 2008 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +113% | 0.74 | −6.3% | −7.2% | −1.5% | −3.9% | −45.3% | −27.7% | −11.2% | −1.2% | −36.0% | −7.7% | 24.7% | +17.6% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.35 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | −9.0% | +10.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.5% | +18.0% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.37 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +3.9% | +22.8% | +7.7% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.8% | +19.9% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.24 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | −13.4% | +1.1% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.7% | +17.8% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.41 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | −6.5% | +13.5% | −0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.1% | +17.0% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.05 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +55.5% | +38.5% | −0.3% | −44.7% | −19.3% | +87.3% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 20.6% | +23.1% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.31 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | +2.1% | +16.7% | +4.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.6% | +17.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.08 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | +24.8% | +12.8% | −10.7% | +4.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.3% | +18.5% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.15 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +28.2% | +27.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.8% | +19.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2020 | 2017 | 2015 | 2008 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +113% | 0.74 | −6.3% | −7.2% | −1.5% | −3.9% | −45.3% | −27.7% | −11.2% | −1.2% | −36.0% | −7.7% | 24.7% | +17.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.26 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +10.1% | −12.7% | +12.6% | −39.6% | −4.7% | +3.5% | −8.3% | −2.5% | −36.8% | 21.8% | +22.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.20 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | −2.4% | −11.6% | −6.0% | −20.5% | −6.4% | +6.9% | −65.1% | −25.6% | +350% | 20.9% | +36.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.09 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +6.7% | +32.1% | +67.7% | −15.2% | +40.0% | +63.6% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −58.7% | 22.4% | +31.7% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.19 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +27.1% | +12.0% | −4.5% | −40.4% | −1.4% | +19.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | −71.3% | 21.3% | +21.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.22 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | −27.4% | +34.8% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.1% | +24.5% |
Common questions
What was MRK's worst drawdown?
MRK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 68.6%, from December 2000 to March 2009. It took about five years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were MRK's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, MRK's best year was 2022, when it returned 49.4%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -45.3%.
Is there a better investment than MRK?
Among MRK's popular alternatives, ABBV earned more than MRK with less volatility over the past 5 years: 26.1% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 16.3% a year at 24.8%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, COR (health care distribution) earned more than MRK with less volatility over the past 5 years: 24.2% a year at 22.8% volatility, against 16.3% a year at 24.8%.
Is MRK more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. MRK's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.8%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MRK's return lands within 24.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is MRK's Sharpe ratio?
MRK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.74, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MRK earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is MRK with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, MRK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.13 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MRK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MRK holding.
What are the best alternatives to MRK?
Of the 22 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed MRK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: TEVA.
Did MRK outperform the S&P 500?
MRK finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 11 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +9.8%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did MRK do in stock market crashes?
MRK fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when MRK fell 19.3% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies MRK?
These had a low correlation with MRK over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.35), DXJ (correlation 0.37) and EMLP (correlation 0.24); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.26), CLS (correlation -0.20) and FIX (correlation 0.09). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than MRK's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of MRK's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.