Relative Intelligence · Discount Retail

How Costco Wholesale (COST) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on COST alone. It places COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where COST stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: COST's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, COST was flat while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 6 months, TGT (Target) rose 20.3% and WMT (Walmart) fell 7.5%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?COST held up far better than its industry: it rose 6.5% over the past 3 months while the discount retail ETF XRT (State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF) fell 1.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. COST rose 10.7% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsCOST has trailed the market, rising 6.9% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. COST led its discount retail peers in 2023, then fell behind WMT (Walmart) and ROST (Ross Stores) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termCOST turned $10,000 into $78,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. COST's 10-year return of 685% puts it ahead of 91% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashCOST fell further than the S&P 500 in three of the last four sell-offs, including the 2022 bear market (31.4% against 24.5%). That said, the Covid crash took 13.7% off COST, against 33.7% for the S&P 500, and less than discount retail peers such as TJX (TJX Companies, 42.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationCOST is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.59 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.60 with the total US market, more closely than 89% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, COST's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.77: 93% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 50% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- KOF (Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., food & beverages) earned more than COST over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 22.3% a year at 24.7% volatility, against 17.4% a year at 22.9%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 14 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than COST with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce), AFL (Aflac) and MPLX.
How much would $10,000 in COST have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in COST over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of COST over the same span and COST's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in COST at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $727,732 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of COST, and AAPL finished highest, at $20,534,853.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 57 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of COST; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- ROST$1M+14,044% total · +18.6% a year
- ASML$984,088+9,741% total · +17.1% a year
- TJX$958,745+9,487% total · +17.0% a year
- COST$727,732+7,177% total · +15.9% a year
- BJRI$285,031+2,750% total · +12.2% a year
- WMT$272,033+2,620% total · +12.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- PSMT$118,754+1,088% total · +8.9% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 695 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of COST; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MPLX$30,642+206% total · +25.1% a year
- KOF$23,968+140% total · +19.1% a year
- WMT$23,813+138% total · +18.9% a year
- PSMT$23,465+135% total · +18.6% a year
- ROST$22,648+126% total · +17.8% a year
- TJX$21,559+116% total · +16.6% a year
- COST$21,378+114% total · +16.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
- BJRI$13,719+37.2% total · +6.5% a year
COST at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- COST's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 70.9%, from January 1992 to January 1995. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, COST's best was 1997, when it returned 77.7%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 36.8%. It lost money in five of those years.
- COST is 9.0% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $441B
- Industry
- Discount Stores
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +6.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +87.2%+23.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +123%+17.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +685%+22.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +77.7%1997
- Worst calendar year
- −36.8%2002
- Losing years
- 5 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 22.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.82return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −70.9%Jan 1992 to Jan 1995
- From its all-time high
- −9.0%below the peak
COST against the whole market
Where COST ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does COST rank among all stocks?
This section ranks COST on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how COST stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- COST's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 1% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | COST | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +6.9% | 1,704 of 3,287 | bottom 49% |
| 3-year return | +87.2% | 1,043 of 3,017 | top 35% |
| 5-year return | +123% | 557 of 2,893 | top 19% |
| 10-year return | +685% | 196 of 2,202 | top 9% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 22.9% | 208 of 2,893 | top 7% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.82 | 263 of 2,893 | top 9% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −31.4% | 31 of 2,187 | top 1% |
What has beaten COST on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). COST sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than COST with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Three stocks and 11 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than COST over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half COST's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 17% less than COST's 22.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.82 for COST.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to COST; faint dots are 8 more of the 14 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than COST?
Investments that beat COST over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among COST's popular alternatives, WMT earned more for the risk it took than COST over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 25.7%, against 31.4% for COST.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, KOF (food & beverages) earned more than COST over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 22.3% a year at 24.7% volatility, against 17.4% a year at 22.9%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 14 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than COST with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them CM, AFL and MPLX.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat COST over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks COST's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than COST follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than COST's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× COST's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than COST's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with COST?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.59 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against COST. 3 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +18.1% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | +312% | 0.43 | — | ||
PSMTPriceSmart, Inc. · Discount Retail | Higher return in most periods | +18.6% | 28.2% | 0.75 | −53.2% | +124% | 0.41 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 2 shownEverything else in Discount Retail and the categories next to it (Specialty Retail, Grocery Stores, E-Commerce, Food & Beverages), plus COST's specific themes. 2 of 58 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.20 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.26 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 134 of 3,556 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.38 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.28 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.42 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.22 | — | ||
SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.41 | 0.13% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.14 | — | ||
DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.29 | — | |
| On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatility | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.30 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for COST
- Annual return
- COST returned 17.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $22,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- COST's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.9%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, COST's return lands within 22.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- COST's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.82, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so COST earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- COST's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 31.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 31.4% fall takes a 45.8% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, COST's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.59 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against COST instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a COST holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 14 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than COST with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 12 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with COST | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.38 | — | |
| 2 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.28 | 0.48% |
| 3 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.42 | — | |
| 4 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.41 | 0.13% |
| 5 | MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy | Whole market | +18.6% | 19.7% | 0.97 | −64.6% | +186% | 0.39 | 0.45% |
| 6 | EUFNiShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF · Financial Sector Equity | Whole market | +18.5% | 21.8% | 0.89 | −53.2% | +233% | 0.27 | 0.49% |
| 7 | EWPiShares MSCI Spain ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +19.2% | 20.3% | 0.97 | −46.4% | +196% | 0.19 | 0.50% |
| 8 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.36 | 0.45% |
| 9 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.18 | 0.61% |
| 10 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.35 | 0.95% |
| 11 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.31 | — | |
| 12 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | -0.02 | 0.80% |
See everything that outperformed COST →
COST against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against COST, compared period by period and year by year.
How do COST's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at COST, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only WMT and TJX were both more rewarding and calmer than COST over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- 13 of the 19 popular alternatives earned less than COST over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, COST returned 17.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (22.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than COST with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| WMT Walmart Inc. | +20.8% | 22.6% |
| TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. | +19.9% | 22.3% |
| PSMT PriceSmart, Inc. | +18.6% | 28.2% |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | +18.1% | 29.5% |
| COST This pageCostco Wholesale Corporation | +17.4% | 22.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| KR The Kroger Co. | +12.3% | 27.3% |
| BJ BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. | +11.9% | 32.5% |
| BJRI BJ's Restaurants, Inc. | +10.8% | 46.3% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| OLLI Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. | +6.8% | 44.4% |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | +5.1% | 18.3% |
| DLTR Dollar Tree, Inc. | +4.3% | 40.1% |
| FIVE Five Below, Inc. | +3.6% | 47.7% |
| SYY Sysco Corporation | +3.5% | 23.6% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | −0.5% | 19.1% |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | −1.3% | 44.4% |
| TGT Target Corporation | −6.5% | 36.1% |
| ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc. | −6.7% | 30.4% |
| DG Dollar General Corporation | −7.4% | 37.0% |
| GO Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. | −10.8% | 49.4% |
Has COST consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares COST with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than COST helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Two of the 19 popular alternatives, ROST and PSMT, outperformed COST in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- WMT earned more for the risk it took than COST (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than COST over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation (this page) | — | +10.7% | +6.5% | 0.0% | +16.9% | +6.9% | +87.2% | +123% | +685% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | — | $441B | — |
| ROST QualifiedRoss Stores, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +2.6% | +0.8% | +4.3% | +30.6% | +51.9% | +111% | +129% | +312% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | — | $76B | — |
| PSMT QualifiedPriceSmart, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +1.6% | −3.6% | +9.3% | +41.7% | +43.2% | +153% | +135% | +124% | 28.2% | 0.75 | −53.2% | — | $5.3B | — |
| WMT Discount StoresWalmart Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | +9.7% | +5.3% | −7.5% | +5.2% | +11.0% | +130% | +158% | +508% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | — | $938B | — |
| BJRI RestaurantsBJ's Restaurants, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −3.3% | −14.2% | +50.6% | +43.8% | +89.9% | +146% | +67.1% | +76.2% | 46.3% | 0.45 | −91.2% | — | $1.3B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| TJX Apparel - RetailThe TJX Companies, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +12.3% | −5.3% | −7.3% | −3.8% | +3.8% | +71.6% | +147% | +361% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | — | $162B | — |
| BURL Apparel - RetailBurlington Stores, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +2.8% | −26.5% | −25.6% | −13.2% | −3.1% | +112% | −6.2% | +240% | 44.4% | 0.19 | −68.9% | — | $16B | — |
| TGT Discount StoresTarget Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | −2.4% | +11.2% | +20.3% | +57.4% | +75.1% | +58.0% | −28.5% | +207% | 36.1% | 0.00 | −64.4% | — | $70B | — |
| GO Grocery StoresGrocery Outlet Holding Corp. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +15.9% | +40.3% | +66.7% | +28.0% | −17.4% | −52.8% | −43.5% | — | 49.4% | 0.01 | −87.6% | — | $1.3B | — |
| PG Household & Personal ProductsThe Procter & Gamble Company | 3/5 short0/3 long | +9.1% | +7.7% | +12.0% | +14.9% | +8.0% | +15.8% | +28.3% | +145% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | — | $370B | — |
| DG Discount StoresDollar General Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +10.6% | +8.1% | +7.2% | 0.0% | +28.5% | +24.2% | −32.0% | +127% | 37.0% | -0.01 | −72.6% | — | $30B | — |
| DLTR Discount StoresDollar Tree, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +11.2% | −1.1% | +16.5% | −2.1% | +26.2% | +13.1% | +23.3% | +64.7% | 40.1% | 0.31 | −64.8% | — | $23B | — |
| BJ Discount StoresBJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +10.9% | +9.0% | +9.4% | +11.3% | +9.0% | +47.7% | +75.3% | — | 32.5% | 0.51 | −38.8% | — | $13B | — |
| FIVE Specialty RetailFive Below, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.2% | +9.6% | −9.7% | +15.7% | +43.3% | +27.2% | +19.6% | +493% | 47.7% | 0.32 | −76.4% | — | $12B | — |
| OLLI Discount StoresOllie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +16.3% | +37.4% | −1.1% | −16.8% | −23.3% | +23.8% | +38.9% | +238% | 44.4% | 0.37 | −66.2% | — | $5.5B | — |
| KR Grocery StoresThe Kroger Co. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +5.5% | +8.7% | −6.1% | +1.8% | −6.9% | +52.6% | +78.5% | +151% | 27.3% | 0.56 | −43.8% | — | $37B | — |
| SYY Food DistributionSysco Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +6.4% | +3.3% | +10.2% | +16.6% | +6.7% | +37.6% | +18.7% | +126% | 23.6% | 0.27 | −63.4% | — | $41B | — |
| PEP Beverages - Non-AlcoholicPepsiCo, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.4% | 0.0% | −12.8% | −2.9% | −9.2% | −6.7% | −2.3% | +72.6% | 19.1% | 0.07 | −30.3% | — | $183B | — |
| ACI Grocery StoresAlbertsons Companies, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +11.1% | −8.6% | −17.0% | −19.5% | −28.6% | −33.6% | −29.2% | — | 30.4% | -0.07 | −54.7% | — | $6.5B | — |
How did COST do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where COST ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with COST and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, COST finished in the top quarter in ten of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 16 of 20.
- COST finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 20 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, OLLI came out ahead of COST most often, in seven of the ten years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of COST; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places COST among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of COST | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COST This pageCostco Wholesale Corporation | — | −5.4% | +39.6% | +49.0% | −19.1% | +51.8% | +32.7% | +45.7% | +10.6% | +22.4% | +0.3% | +18.9% | +20.5% | +21.9% | +28.4% | +16.7% | +23.7% | +14.3% | −24.0% | +33.2% | +7.9% | +3.2% | +31.1% | +32.5% | −36.8% | +11.1% | −12.5% | +26.4% | +61.8% | +77.7% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 10 of 29 | 16 of 20 | 5 of 20 | 3 of 20 | 16 of 20 | 3 of 20 | 6 of 19 | 2 of 18 | 8 of 17 | 9 of 17 | 14 of 17 | 3 of 16 | 7 of 16 | 11 of 15 | 3 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 9 of 13 | 7 of 13 | 3 of 13 | 7 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 2 of 13 | 3 of 13 | 13 of 13 | 6 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 6 of 13 | 6 of 13 | 1 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +20.4% | +10.4% | +20.6% | +2.9% | −6.0% | +5.8% | +41.3% | +4.8% | +23.5% | +23.0% | +15.3% | +27.0% | +39.9% | +14.9% | +52.0% | +49.7% | +45.3% | +17.8% | −12.0% | +2.4% | +0.9% | +9.4% | +25.5% | +32.9% | +91.0% | −5.7% | −8.3% | +9.7% | +47.9% |
| PSMT PriceSmart, Inc. | 11 of 28 | +34.8% | +25.0% | +26.2% | −15.8% | −19.1% | +29.6% | +21.6% | −30.8% | +3.5% | +1.5% | −8.3% | −20.4% | +50.6% | +12.0% | +85.5% | +90.2% | +1.8% | −29.9% | +69.4% | +114% | +10.5% | +20.9% | −72.7% | −34.6% | +6.5% | −16.1% | +124% | +2.2% | — |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 9 of 29 | +24.5% | +74.0% | +12.9% | −0.5% | +1.9% | +23.4% | +30.1% | −3.4% | +46.6% | +16.1% | −26.6% | +11.8% | +18.2% | +17.1% | +13.8% | +3.1% | −2.5% | +20.0% | +4.9% | +0.2% | −10.2% | +0.6% | +5.6% | −11.8% | +8.9% | −22.7% | +70.5% | +107% | +74.6% |
| BJRI BJ's Restaurants, Inc. | 11 of 29 | +12.1% | −2.4% | +36.5% | −23.6% | −10.2% | +1.8% | −24.1% | +40.0% | −7.0% | −9.6% | −13.4% | +61.7% | −5.6% | −27.4% | +27.9% | +88.1% | +74.8% | −33.8% | −19.5% | −11.6% | +63.3% | −6.2% | +116% | +32.9% | +71.2% | +161% | −13.7% | −10.3% | −70.0% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 18 of 28 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% | −16.0% | +178% | +74.6% | −30.5% | −79.6% | +42.2% | +968% | — |
| TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +28.7% | +30.6% | +19.7% | +6.7% | +12.8% | +12.3% | +38.8% | +18.9% | +3.5% | +7.4% | +4.6% | +8.8% | +51.7% | +33.0% | +47.6% | +22.9% | +81.0% | −27.4% | +1.8% | +24.0% | −6.8% | +15.0% | +13.8% | −1.6% | +44.3% | +37.1% | −29.5% | +70.3% | +44.9% |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 6 of 12 | +1.3% | +46.6% | −4.1% | −30.4% | +11.5% | +14.7% | +40.2% | +32.2% | +45.2% | +97.5% | −9.2% | +47.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TGT Target Corporation | 12 of 29 | −24.5% | −2.3% | −1.4% | −34.2% | +32.9% | +40.5% | +100% | +4.7% | −5.8% | +2.7% | −1.6% | +23.8% | +9.5% | +18.2% | −13.0% | +26.3% | +42.4% | −30.0% | −11.6% | +4.7% | +6.6% | +36.1% | +29.0% | −26.5% | +28.0% | −11.5% | +36.2% | +62.2% | +74.2% |
| GO Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. | 1 of 6 | −35.3% | −42.1% | −7.6% | +3.2% | −28.0% | +21.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 7 of 29 | −12.3% | +17.3% | −0.9% | −5.1% | +20.5% | +14.2% | +39.7% | +3.6% | +12.7% | +9.3% | −10.0% | +15.4% | +23.6% | +5.2% | +7.0% | +9.3% | +1.2% | −13.8% | +16.7% | +13.4% | +7.2% | +12.4% | +18.5% | +11.4% | +3.1% | −27.1% | +21.6% | +16.0% | +50.5% |
| DG Dollar General Corporation | 9 of 16 | +79.6% | −43.1% | −44.1% | +5.6% | +13.0% | +35.9% | +45.7% | +17.6% | +26.9% | +4.3% | +2.9% | +17.2% | +36.8% | +7.1% | +34.2% | +36.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DLTR Dollar Tree, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +64.1% | −47.2% | +0.4% | +0.7% | +30.1% | +14.9% | +4.1% | −15.8% | +39.0% | −0.1% | +9.7% | +24.7% | +39.1% | −2.4% | +48.2% | +74.2% | +15.8% | +60.9% | −13.9% | +25.7% | −16.8% | −4.3% | +22.3% | −20.5% | +26.1% | −24.1% | +10.8% | +58.4% | +62.2% |
| BJ BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 7 | +0.8% | +34.0% | +0.8% | −1.2% | +79.6% | +63.9% | +2.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FIVE Five Below, Inc. | 7 of 13 | +79.5% | −50.8% | +20.5% | −14.5% | +18.2% | +36.9% | +25.0% | +54.3% | +66.0% | +24.5% | −21.4% | −5.5% | +34.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OLLI Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −0.1% | +44.6% | +62.0% | −8.5% | −37.4% | +25.2% | −1.8% | +24.9% | +87.2% | +67.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KR The Kroger Co. | 11 of 29 | +4.2% | +36.9% | +5.0% | +0.4% | +45.4% | +11.9% | +7.9% | +2.1% | −19.0% | −16.4% | +31.8% | +64.8% | +54.5% | +9.6% | +10.5% | +10.7% | −20.9% | 0.0% | +17.0% | +23.4% | +7.6% | −5.3% | +20.0% | −26.1% | −22.8% | +43.4% | −37.6% | +64.7% | +58.1% |
| SYY Sysco Corporation | 8 of 29 | −1.0% | +7.4% | −1.7% | −0.3% | +8.3% | −10.4% | +39.6% | +5.5% | +12.5% | +38.8% | +5.8% | +13.4% | +18.9% | +11.9% | +3.5% | +8.0% | +26.7% | −23.5% | −13.2% | +21.0% | −17.3% | +3.7% | +26.8% | +15.6% | −11.7% | +53.5% | +45.6% | +22.1% | +41.8% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 7 of 29 | −1.8% | −7.6% | −3.3% | +6.8% | +20.5% | +11.7% | +27.4% | −4.8% | +17.8% | +7.8% | +8.8% | +17.3% | +24.6% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +14.6% | −26.0% | +23.8% | +7.9% | +15.3% | +13.8% | +12.1% | −12.2% | −0.6% | +42.6% | −12.4% | +14.3% | +25.7% |
| ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc. | 2 of 5 | −10.0% | −12.5% | +13.4% | −6.8% | +75.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How COST has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were COST's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents COST's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- The slowest recovery came after COST fell 53.4% from May 2000 to December 2002; it did not regain that peak until July 2006, four years later.
Green means COST fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | COST fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −70.9% | — | Jan 1992 | Jan 1995 | 3 years | Nov 1997 | 2.8 years |
| No named crash | −62.4% | — | Mar 1987 | Oct 1987 | 7 months | Jul 1988 | 9 months |
| Dot-com bust | −53.4% | −37.0% | May 2000 | Dec 2002 | 2.6 years | Jul 2006 | 3.6 years |
| 2008 financial crisis | −48.0% | −45.7% | Jul 2008 | Mar 2009 | 8 months | Dec 2010 | 21 months |
| No named crash | −36.5% | — | Jul 1990 | Sep 1990 | 2 months | Dec 1990 | 3 months |
How did COST do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far COST, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, GO held up best, falling less than COST in all three crashes they both traded through.
- COST fell further than the S&P 500 in four of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when COST fell 31.4% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than COST.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COST This pageCostco Wholesale Corporation | — | −3.1% | −31.4% | −13.7% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −15.2% | −13.5% | −1.2% | −48.0% | −50.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −4.9% | −37.5% | −51.4% | −26.0% | −5.1% | −20.5% | −12.4% | −2.6% | −46.5% | −45.8% |
| PSMT PriceSmart, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −2.6% | −34.1% | −29.7% | −34.1% | −4.4% | −27.9% | −22.1% | −2.6% | −66.5% | −60.0% |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 8 of 10 | −0.8% | −25.7% | −13.1% | −18.3% | −4.9% | −22.3% | −10.5% | −1.5% | −26.2% | −31.8% |
| BJRI BJ's Restaurants, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −8.8% | −43.3% | −85.0% | −31.7% | −4.1% | −16.7% | −18.7% | −1.4% | −66.9% | −40.9% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −4.7% | −27.7% | −42.5% | −25.6% | −5.3% | −16.1% | −9.7% | −2.1% | −49.9% | −32.6% |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −4.8% | −61.5% | −51.4% | −15.6% | −3.7% | −26.8% | — | — | — | — |
| TGT Target Corporation | 3 of 10 | −3.4% | −43.9% | −21.7% | −30.3% | −3.0% | −15.8% | −10.4% | −1.3% | −60.6% | −42.6% |
| GO Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. | 3 of 3 | −1.8% | −28.7% | −13.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 8 of 10 | −0.7% | −23.8% | −22.9% | −9.6% | −5.1% | −10.9% | −8.9% | −0.7% | −39.0% | −27.1% |
| DG Dollar General Corporation | 5 of 8 | −0.7% | −27.6% | −18.4% | −15.9% | −4.4% | −25.2% | −8.4% | −2.6% | — | — |
| DLTR Dollar Tree, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −1.5% | −26.5% | −30.2% | −7.2% | −6.7% | −24.1% | −11.3% | −1.9% | −49.1% | −67.1% |
| BJ BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −3.3% | −25.4% | −20.3% | −32.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FIVE Five Below, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −2.5% | −44.6% | −55.8% | −31.1% | −2.7% | −28.9% | — | — | — | — |
| OLLI Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −6.2% | −27.7% | −40.0% | −36.1% | −3.9% | −23.3% | — | — | — | — |
| KR The Kroger Co. | 6 of 10 | −1.3% | −29.6% | −13.0% | −14.9% | −6.0% | −14.3% | −13.7% | −2.2% | −35.3% | −58.3% |
| SYY Sysco Corporation | 6 of 10 | −2.3% | −20.8% | −59.5% | −17.8% | −6.8% | −6.4% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −43.1% | −27.2% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 8 of 10 | −0.8% | −11.9% | −28.3% | −12.3% | −7.2% | −10.2% | −8.3% | −0.2% | −40.4% | −33.0% |
| ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −2.4% | −31.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does COST move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares COST with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, COST captured 93% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 50% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.77. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only WMT had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than COST's 1.85, out of 16 popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than COST's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COST This pageCostco Wholesale Corporation | 93% | 50% | 1.85 | 0.77 |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 74% | 36% | 2.08 | 0.53 |
| KR The Kroger Co. | 49% | 36% | 1.34 | 0.40 |
| TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. | 81% | 65% | 1.25 | 0.78 |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 46% | 41% | 1.13 | 0.41 |
| FIVE Five Below, Inc. | 111% | 102% | 1.09 | 1.13 |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 93% | 89% | 1.05 | 0.93 |
| DG Dollar General Corporation | 46% | 46% | 1.00 | 0.37 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| TGT Target Corporation | 83% | 87% | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| OLLI Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. | 92% | 100% | 0.92 | 0.83 |
| PSMT PriceSmart, Inc. | 68% | 79% | 0.86 | 0.80 |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 103% | 121% | 0.85 | 1.22 |
| SYY Sysco Corporation | 76% | 100% | 0.76 | 1.02 |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 48% | 65% | 0.75 | 0.48 |
| DLTR Dollar Tree, Inc. | 52% | 79% | 0.66 | 0.75 |
| BJRI BJ's Restaurants, Inc. | 99% | 158% | 0.63 | 1.77 |
What diversifies COST?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with COST's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing COST with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in COST into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+16.4% for COST alone, +16.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and FJAN have moved largely independently of COST over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- XLE made money in three of the five calendar years in which COST lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which COST lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% COST and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2008 | 2002 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +123% | 0.82 | −5.4% | −19.1% | −24.0% | −36.8% | −12.5% | 23.3% | +16.4% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.39 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | — | — | — | 19.5% | +16.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.28 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | −20.8% | — | — | 19.5% | +18.9% |
| FJAN Multi-AssetFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | 0.48 | +69.0% | 1.05 | +12.7% | −4.0% | — | — | — | 19.7% | +15.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.49 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | — | — | — | 20.3% | +16.6% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.39 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | −44.7% | −47.0% | — | 22.3% | +21.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.15 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | +4.9% | — | — | 19.5% | +17.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.41 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −10.4% | — | — | — | 20.7% | +17.9% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.14 | +177% | 0.93 | +7.9% | +64.4% | −39.0% | −14.8% | +24.4% | 20.0% | +18.7% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2008 | 2002 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +123% | 0.82 | −5.4% | −19.1% | −24.0% | −36.8% | −12.5% | 23.3% | +16.4% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.22 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −39.6% | −8.3% | +108% | 20.5% | +21.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.26 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | −20.5% | −65.1% | −2.3% | 24.4% | +34.2% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.36 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | −15.2% | −9.4% | −71.1% | 23.4% | +30.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.34 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +61.2% | 20.9% | +20.5% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.14 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | — | — | — | 20.6% | +23.5% |
Common questions
What was COST's worst drawdown?
COST's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 70.9%, from January 1992 to January 1995. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were COST's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, COST's best year was 1997, when it returned 77.7%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -36.8%.
Is there a better investment than COST?
Among COST's popular alternatives, WMT earned more for the risk it took than COST over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 25.7%, against 31.4% for COST. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, KOF (food & beverages) earned more than COST over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 22.3% a year at 24.7% volatility, against 17.4% a year at 22.9%.
Is COST more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. COST's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.9%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, COST's return lands within 22.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is COST's Sharpe ratio?
COST's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.82, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so COST earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is COST with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, COST's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.59 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against COST instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a COST holding.
What are the best alternatives to COST?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed COST in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: ROST and PSMT.
Did COST outperform the S&P 500?
COST finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 20 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -5.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did COST do in stock market crashes?
COST fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when COST fell 31.4% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies COST?
These had a low correlation with COST over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.39), DXJ (correlation 0.28) and FJAN (correlation 0.48); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.22), CLS (correlation 0.26) and FIX (correlation 0.36). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than COST's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of COST's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to COST
ROSTRoss Stores
WMTWalmart
AMZNAmazon.com
TJXTJX Companies
TGTTarget
PGProcter & Gamble
KRKroger
SYYSysco
PEPPepsiCo