Relative Intelligence · Household & Personal Products

How Procter & Gamble (PG) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on PG alone. It places PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where PG stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: PG's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowIts household & personal product peers were far apart over the past 3 months, from ELF (e.l.f. Beauty, up 44.1%) to CL (Colgate-Palmolive, up 3.4%). Over the past 3 months, PG rose 7.7% against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?PG rose 7.7% over the past 3 months, 3.6 points ahead of the household & personal products ETF XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF), which rose 4.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: PG rose 9.1% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsPG has trailed the market, rising 8.0% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (15.8% against 89.3%). Even so, PG lagged its household & personal product peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termPG turned $10,000 into $24,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, PG has typically lost about 68% as much as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, PG has a correlation of 0.33 over 5 years, less closely than 65% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Over 10 years, PG's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.41: 46% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 41% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- PKG (Packaging Corporation of America, packaging) was ahead of PG in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (25.8% volatility against 18.2%).
- Whole market
- 314 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF), BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway) and BRK-A (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in PG have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in PG over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of PG over the same span and PG's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in PG at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $87,839 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Seven of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of PG, and AMZN finished highest, at $11,484,924.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 581 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PG; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- COST$727,732+7,177% total · +15.9% a year
- IPAR$725,262+7,153% total · +15.9% a year
- CHD$554,277+5,443% total · +14.8% a year
- WMT$272,033+2,620% total · +12.1% a year
- TGT$184,797+1,748% total · +10.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- CL$89,873+799% total · +7.9% a year
- PG$87,839+778% total · +7.8% a year
- UL$84,946+749% total · +7.7% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2,180 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PG; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ELF$34,758+248% total · +28.3% a year
- COST$21,378+114% total · +16.4% a year
- PKG$19,327+93.3% total · +14.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- IPAR$16,792+67.9% total · +10.9% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
- CL$12,718+27.2% total · +4.9% a year
- CHD$12,116+21.2% total · +3.9% a year
- PG$11,814+18.1% total · +3.4% a year
- TGT$8,005−20.0% total · −4.4% a year
PG at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- PG's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 54.4%, from January to March 2000. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, PG's best was 1997, when it returned 50.5%, and its worst was 2000, when it lost 27.1%. It lost money in six of those years.
- PG is 6.9% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $370B
- Industry
- Household & Personal Products
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +8.0%total return
- Past 3 years
- +15.8%+5.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- +28.3%+5.1% a year
- Past 10 years
- +145%+9.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +50.5%1997
- Worst calendar year
- −27.1%2000
- Losing years
- 6 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 18.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.37return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −54.4%Jan 2000 to Mar 2000
- From its all-time high
- −6.9%below the peak
PG against the whole market
Where PG ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does PG rank among all stocks?
This section ranks PG on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how PG stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- PG's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 1% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | PG | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +8.0% | 1,663 of 3,287 | bottom 50% |
| 3-year return | +15.8% | 2,076 of 3,017 | bottom 32% |
| 5-year return | +28.3% | 1,357 of 2,893 | top 47% |
| 10-year return | +145% | 1,100 of 2,202 | top 50% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 18.3% | 50 of 2,893 | top 2% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.37 | 1,341 of 2,893 | top 46% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −23.8% | 3 of 2,187 | top 1% |
What has beaten PG on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). PG sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than PG with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Eight stocks and 306 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than PG over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 9% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half PG's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 39% less than PG's 18.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.37 for PG.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to PG; faint dots are 93 more of the 314 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 3 with more than 1.6× PG's volatility are in the table only
Is there a better investment than PG?
Investments that beat PG over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among PG's popular alternatives, CL, ELF and CHD were ahead of PG in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PKG (packaging) was ahead of PG in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (25.8% volatility against 18.2%).
- Across the whole market, 314 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VOO, BRK-B and BRK-A.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat PG over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks PG's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than PG follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than PG's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× PG's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than PG's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with PG?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +5.1% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +145% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.33 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 5 shownThe investments people most often weigh against PG. 5 of 18 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +7.2% | 19.2% | 0.46 | −29.0% | +68.8% | 0.77 | — | ||
ELFe.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · Household & Personal Products | Higher return in most periods | +31.2% | 58.5% | 0.77 | −77.3% | +331% | 0.27 | — | |
CHDChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. · Household & Personal Products | Higher return in most periods | +6.1% | 21.1% | 0.39 | −31.7% | +154% | 0.80 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | −6.5% | 36.1% | 0.00 | −64.4% | +207% | 0.17 | — | ||
IPARInter Parfums, Inc. · Household & Personal Products | Higher return in most periods | +11.6% | 33.7% | 0.49 | −54.9% | +350% | 0.41 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 1 shownEverything else in Household & Personal Products and the categories next to it (Discount Retail, Packaging, Consumer Health, E-Commerce), plus PG's specific themes. 1 of 26 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
PKGPackaging Corporation of America · Packaging | Higher return in most periods | +15.4% | 25.8% | 0.69 | −38.2% | +294% | 0.49 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 609 of 3,589 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.46 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.70 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.48 | 0.06% | ||
BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.35 | 0.69% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +11.4% | 14.7% | 0.81 | −38.5% | +205% | 0.45 | 0.18% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.47 | 0.08% | ||
JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.17 | 0.20% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.43 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for PG
- Annual return
- PG returned 5.1% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $12,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- PG's volatility over the past 5 years was 18.2%, 1.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PG's return lands within 18.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- PG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.37, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PG earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- PG's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 23.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 23.8% fall takes a 31.2% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, PG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.33 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PG holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 314 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than PG with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with PG | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.46 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.70 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.48 | 0.06% | |
| 4 | BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | Whole market | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.35 | 0.69% |
| 5 | Whole market | +11.4% | 14.7% | 0.81 | −38.5% | +205% | 0.45 | 0.18% | |
| 6 | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.47 | 0.08% | |
| 7 | CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Whole market | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.32 | — |
| 8 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.53 | 0.08% |
| 9 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.33 | 0.79% |
| 10 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.25 | 0.85% |
| 11 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.42 | 0.12% |
| 12 | Whole market | +7.5% | 11.0% | 0.71 | −13.7% | — | 0.60 | 0.35% | |
| 13 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +221% | 0.48 | 0.20% |
| 14 | BCIabrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +10.1% | 16.7% | 0.66 | −32.7% | — | 0.14 | 0.26% |
| 15 | BUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · Buffered Equity | Whole market | +9.9% | 10.5% | 0.96 | −13.7% | — | 0.32 | 0.10% |
| 16 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.40 | 0.05% |
| 17 | FHLCFidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +7.3% | 15.4% | 0.53 | −28.8% | +199% | 0.42 | 0.08% |
| 18 | DSTLDistillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.3% | 16.1% | 0.75 | −33.1% | — | 0.41 | 0.39% |
| 19 | PPHVanEck Pharmaceutical ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.8% | 0.78 | −29.7% | +153% | 0.52 | 0.36% |
| 20 | FTXHFirst Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.9% | 16.9% | 0.75 | −32.1% | +153% | 0.37 | 0.60% |
| 21 | ACIOAptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.3% | 11.1% | 0.86 | −14.2% | — | 0.37 | 0.79% |
| 22 | PJPInvesco Pharmaceuticals ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.2% | 16.6% | 0.72 | −34.0% | +135% | 0.33 | 0.58% |
| 23 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.33 | 0.03% | |
| 24 | SIXHETC 6 Meridian Hedged Equity Index Option ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.2% | 1.00 | −11.7% | — | 0.53 | 0.31% |
| 25 | HEGDSwan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +7.9% | 9.5% | 0.85 | −14.5% | — | 0.29 | 0.88% |
| 26 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.51 | 0.40% |
| 27 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.43 | 0.05% | |
| 28 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.44 | 0.03% | |
| 29 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.51 | 0.04% | |
| 30 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.31 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.38 | 0.06% | |
| 32 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.34 | 0.21% | |
| 33 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.1% | 0.57 | −39.0% | +211% | 0.42 | 0.20% | |
| 34 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.3% | 0.71 | −34.1% | +293% | 0.40 | 0.15% | |
| 35 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +157% | 0.44 | 0.31% |
| 36 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.44 | 0.25% |
| 37 | VOEVanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF · US Mid-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.4% | 15.8% | 0.65 | −43.2% | +182% | 0.42 | 0.05% |
| 38 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.37 | 0.15% |
| 39 | HYGHiShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +6.6% | 7.1% | 0.94 | −23.9% | +74.5% | 0.18 | 1.12% |
| 40 | FTSFortis Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.4% | 16.4% | 0.58 | −34.3% | +154% | 0.49 | — |
| 41 | USMViShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF · US Low-Volatility Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 12.3% | 0.66 | −33.1% | +176% | 0.56 | 0.15% |
| 42 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.48 | 0.20% |
| 43 | MGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +12.6% | 13.4% | 0.95 | −35.4% | +244% | 0.52 | 0.05% |
| 44 | SDYState Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 14.0% | 0.59 | −36.7% | +157% | 0.55 | 0.35% |
| 45 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +253% | 0.41 | 0.15% |
| 46 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.46 | 0.35% |
| 47 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.32 | 0.40% |
| 48 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.46 | 0.43% |
| 49 | BBCAJPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +11.4% | 16.7% | 0.73 | −42.8% | — | 0.37 | 0.19% |
| 50 | DIVOAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +11.1% | 11.9% | 0.95 | −30.0% | — | 0.53 | 0.56% |
| 51 | XLPState Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF · Consumer Staples | Whole market | +7.2% | 13.8% | 0.57 | −24.5% | +121% | 0.82 | 0.08% |
| 52 | IGFiShares Global Infrastructure ETF · Infrastructure Equity | Whole market | +9.0% | 13.9% | 0.69 | −42.1% | +113% | 0.45 | 0.37% |
| 53 | FNDESchwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +9.8% | 17.0% | 0.64 | −39.9% | +151% | 0.37 | 0.39% |
| 54 | QYLDGlobal X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.0% | 0.62 | −24.7% | +156% | 0.23 | 0.60% |
| 55 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.42 | 0.95% |
| 56 | VPUVanguard Utilities ETF · Utilities Equity | Whole market | +7.6% | 17.1% | 0.52 | −36.4% | +134% | 0.47 | 0.09% |
| 57 | DBMFiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +9.8% | 12.4% | 0.82 | −20.4% | — | 0.02 | 0.85% |
| 58 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.34 | 0.12% |
| 59 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.47 | 0.60% |
| 60 | FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +6.2% | 13.2% | 0.52 | −31.9% | +188% | 0.56 | 0.53% |
| 61 | TXNMTXNM Energy, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +7.2% | 14.9% | 0.54 | −46.4% | +150% | 0.00 | — |
| 62 | FTLSFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.2% | 10.4% | 0.99 | −20.6% | +158% | 0.39 | 0.95% |
| 63 | OMFLInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF · US Multifactor Equity | Whole market | +9.0% | 16.4% | 0.61 | −33.2% | — | 0.35 | 0.29% |
| 64 | EWUiShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF · International | Whole market | +11.4% | 16.4% | 0.74 | −43.3% | +130% | 0.49 | 0.50% |
| 65 | PTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.5% | 11.8% | 0.83 | −26.6% | +188% | 0.32 | 0.60% |
| 66 | DEMWisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +9.6% | 15.5% | 0.67 | −37.8% | +133% | 0.33 | 0.63% |
| 67 | WTVWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.0% | 0.83 | −42.2% | +303% | 0.36 | 0.12% |
| 68 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.49 | 0.09% |
| 69 | AORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +6.4% | 10.7% | 0.64 | −23.0% | +118% | 0.37 | 0.20% |
| 70 | XYLDGlobal X - S&P 500 Covered Call ETF · International | Whole market | +7.4% | 11.2% | 0.70 | −33.4% | +128% | 0.35 | 0.60% |
| 71 | EQWLInvesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.0% | 0.81 | −34.3% | +291% | 0.42 | 0.30% |
| 72 | HDEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +12.8% | 14.2% | 0.92 | −36.4% | +134% | 0.47 | 0.09% |
| 73 | MLPAGlobal X - MLP ETF · Energy | Whole market | +15.2% | 17.2% | 0.91 | −74.3% | +80.0% | 0.28 | 0.77% |
| 74 | FTHIFirst Trust BuyWrite Income ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +10.3% | 13.3% | 0.81 | −32.7% | +126% | 0.27 | 0.75% |
| 75 | FLQLFranklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.8% | 16.3% | 0.88 | −33.6% | — | 0.38 | 0.15% |
| 76 | HFXINYLI FTSE International Equity Currency Neutral ETF · International | Whole market | +11.4% | 15.3% | 0.79 | −32.4% | +180% | 0.45 | 0.19% |
| 77 | FNDCSchwab Fundamental International Small Company Index ETF · International | Whole market | +7.7% | 16.0% | 0.55 | −43.2% | +121% | 0.41 | 0.39% |
| 78 | DDWMWisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund · International | Whole market | +12.3% | 13.4% | 0.94 | −35.0% | +149% | 0.50 | 0.40% |
| 79 | DHSWisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Fund · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.0% | 13.9% | 0.89 | −37.4% | +156% | 0.45 | 0.38% |
| 80 | RODMHartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF · International | Whole market | +10.6% | 13.5% | 0.82 | −36.0% | +141% | 0.46 | 0.29% |
| 81 | SEAL-PBSeapeak LLC · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +8.0% | 14.3% | 0.62 | −47.8% | — | 0.03 | — |
| 82 | FGDFirst Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund · International | Whole market | +11.6% | 14.8% | 0.82 | −44.8% | +155% | 0.40 | 0.55% |
| 83 | RLYState Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +9.9% | 13.3% | 0.78 | −34.2% | +128% | 0.38 | 0.50% |
| 84 | RAAXVanEck Real Assets ETF · Commodities | Whole market | +11.7% | 15.6% | 0.79 | −33.9% | — | 0.40 | 0.55% |
| 85 | FDLOFidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.8% | 13.0% | 0.79 | −34.4% | +249% | 0.48 | 0.15% |
| 86 | DBAInvesco DB Agriculture Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +10.7% | 13.8% | 0.81 | −35.3% | +62.2% | 0.27 | 0.90% |
| 87 | RDIVInvesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.2% | 17.3% | 0.75 | −50.0% | +184% | 0.36 | 0.39% |
| 88 | EDIVState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +11.2% | 13.8% | 0.84 | −40.7% | +119% | 0.42 | 0.49% |
| 89 | TDVGT. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +9.6% | 13.8% | 0.73 | −19.2% | — | 0.52 | 0.50% |
| 90 | EXIiShares Global Industrials ETF · Industrials | Whole market | +10.6% | 17.3% | 0.67 | −39.6% | +203% | 0.47 | 0.38% |
| 91 | PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Technology | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.1% | 0.73 | −28.1% | +305% | 0.18 | 0.65% |
| 92 | REGLProShares - S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +7.2% | 16.0% | 0.52 | −36.4% | +148% | 0.41 | 0.40% |
| 93 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.46 | 0.19% |
| 94 | JVALJPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.0% | 17.2% | 0.75 | −40.4% | — | 0.35 | 0.12% |
| 95 | FLSPFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +8.4% | 13.4% | 0.68 | −22.9% | — | 0.28 | 0.65% |
| 96 | ROUSHartford Multifactor US Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.3% | 14.4% | 0.88 | −35.5% | +238% | 0.48 | 0.19% |
| 97 | NTSXWisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +8.2% | 17.2% | 0.55 | −31.4% | — | 0.33 | 0.20% |
| 98 | LGLVState Street SPDR US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +7.6% | 13.0% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +199% | 0.58 | 0.12% |
| 99 | FDRRFidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.6% | 15.0% | 0.87 | −36.5% | +265% | 0.40 | 0.15% |
| 100 | FYLDCambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.0% | 0.85 | −44.6% | +203% | 0.40 | 0.59% |
PG against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against PG, compared period by period and year by year.
How do PG's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at PG, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 18 popular alternatives earned more than PG over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Ten of the 18 popular alternatives earned less than PG over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, PG returned 5.1% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (18.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than PG with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | +31.2% | 58.5% |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | +20.8% | 22.6% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | +17.4% | 22.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | +11.6% | 33.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | +7.2% | 19.2% |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | +6.1% | 21.1% |
| UL Unilever PLC | +5.5% | 21.5% |
| PG This pageThe Procter & Gamble Company | +5.1% | 18.3% |
| KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 0.0% | 21.1% |
| EPC Edgewell Personal Care Company | −2.4% | 34.3% |
| ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc. | −6.0% | 36.3% |
| TGT Target Corporation | −6.5% | 36.1% |
| CLX The Clorox Company | −8.3% | 26.7% |
| COTY Coty Inc. | −16.1% | 45.3% |
| EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | −17.7% | 44.5% |
| NWL Newell Brands Inc. | −20.7% | 55.5% |
| WD Walker & Dunlop, Inc. | −20.9% | 38.0% |
| HELE Helen of Troy Limited | −33.6% | 53.0% |
Has PG consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares PG with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than PG helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Five of the 19 popular alternatives, led by CHD, ELF and TGT, outperformed PG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- CHD outperformed PG in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than PG over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company (this page) | — | +9.1% | +7.7% | +12.0% | +14.9% | +8.0% | +15.8% | +28.3% | +145% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | — | $370B | — |
| CHD QualifiedChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +11.0% | +8.7% | +10.4% | +29.4% | +21.9% | +21.9% | +34.6% | +154% | 21.1% | 0.39 | −31.7% | — | $25B | — |
| ELF Qualifiede.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +17.3% | +44.1% | +67.7% | +47.5% | −10.0% | +12.6% | +289% | +331% | 58.5% | 0.77 | −77.3% | — | $6.8B | — |
| TGT QualifiedTarget Corporation | 4/5 short2/3 long | −2.4% | +11.2% | +20.3% | +57.4% | +75.1% | +58.0% | −28.5% | +207% | 36.1% | 0.00 | −64.4% | — | $70B | — |
| CL QualifiedColgate-Palmolive Company | 4/5 short2/3 long | +10.2% | +3.4% | +14.5% | +24.6% | +22.9% | +38.3% | +41.8% | +68.8% | 19.2% | 0.46 | −29.0% | — | $75B | — |
| IPAR QualifiedInter Parfums, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +2.8% | −6.2% | +20.0% | +38.9% | +21.2% | +1.3% | +72.8% | +350% | 33.7% | 0.49 | −54.9% | — | $3.7B | — |
| COST Discount StoresCostco Wholesale Corporation | 2/5 short3/3 long | +10.7% | +6.5% | 0.0% | +16.9% | +6.9% | +87.2% | +123% | +685% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | — | $441B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| WMT Discount StoresWalmart Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +9.7% | +5.3% | −7.5% | +5.2% | +11.0% | +130% | +158% | +508% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | — | $938B | — |
| UL Household & Personal ProductsUnilever PLC | 1/5 short2/3 long | +4.9% | +6.1% | +14.6% | +2.9% | −4.7% | +32.9% | +30.5% | +89.8% | 21.5% | 0.36 | −30.1% | — | $141B | — |
| NWL Household & Personal ProductsNewell Brands Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +1.4% | +12.0% | +34.0% | +60.0% | +25.1% | −5.5% | −68.7% | −83.2% | 55.5% | -0.14 | −91.8% | — | $2.4B | — |
| EL Household & Personal ProductsThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +10.2% | +27.3% | +37.3% | +0.4% | +5.0% | −18.3% | −62.3% | +39.8% | 44.5% | -0.21 | −85.8% | — | $38B | — |
| EPC Household & Personal ProductsEdgewell Personal Care Company | 3/5 short0/3 long | +4.2% | −0.8% | +21.3% | +70.7% | +45.3% | −14.0% | −11.5% | −58.3% | 34.3% | 0.10 | −78.6% | — | $1.3B | — |
| HELE Household & Personal ProductsHelen of Troy Limited | 3/5 short0/3 long | +6.4% | +5.1% | +48.7% | +42.7% | +53.8% | −71.6% | −87.1% | −63.6% | 53.0% | -0.51 | −94.7% | — | $688M | — |
| COTY Household & Personal ProductsCoty Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +28.3% | +19.3% | +35.9% | +3.5% | −22.0% | −66.1% | −58.3% | −84.3% | 45.3% | -0.16 | −91.0% | — | $2.8B | — |
| KVUE Household & Personal ProductsKenvue Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +9.1% | +3.7% | +13.5% | +16.6% | +36.7% | +12.0% | — | — | — | — | −44.1% | — | $37B | — |
| KMB Household & Personal ProductsKimberly-Clark Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +10.8% | +1.1% | +12.8% | +11.0% | −5.7% | −0.4% | 0.0% | +29.9% | 21.1% | 0.11 | −34.1% | — | $36B | — |
| ENR Electrical Equipment & PartsEnergizer Holdings, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +2.8% | +10.8% | +12.2% | +16.7% | −2.5% | −19.5% | −26.5% | −35.4% | 36.3% | 0.01 | −67.5% | — | $1.5B | — |
| WD Financial - MortgagesWalker & Dunlop, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.9% | −29.9% | −32.2% | −40.4% | −57.2% | −43.6% | −69.0% | +74.8% | 38.0% | -0.43 | −76.0% | — | $1.1B | — |
| CLX Household & Personal ProductsThe Clorox Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.0% | −8.1% | −12.3% | −10.2% | −23.5% | −20.1% | −35.3% | −3.1% | 26.7% | -0.19 | −58.8% | — | $11B | — |
How did PG do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where PG ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with PG and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- PG finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, COST came out ahead of PG most often, in 22 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, PG finished in the top quarter in three of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 20.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of PG; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places PG among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of PG | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG This pageThe Procter & Gamble Company | — | −12.3% | +17.3% | −0.9% | −5.1% | +20.5% | +14.2% | +39.7% | +3.6% | +12.7% | +9.3% | −10.0% | +15.4% | +23.6% | +5.2% | +7.0% | +9.3% | +1.2% | −13.8% | +16.7% | +13.4% | +7.2% | +12.4% | +18.5% | +11.4% | +3.1% | −27.1% | +21.6% | +16.0% | +50.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 29 | 7 of 20 | 7 of 20 | 13 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 9 of 19 | 13 of 19 | 7 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 12 of 19 | 5 of 18 | 14 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 11 of 16 | 15 of 16 | 10 of 16 | 10 of 15 | 14 of 15 | 6 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 10 of 15 | 3 of 15 | 9 of 15 | 11 of 15 | 6 of 15 | 9 of 15 | 11 of 14 | 9 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 6 of 13 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 16 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 21 of 29 | −18.9% | +12.0% | +18.7% | −20.4% | +18.9% | +25.5% | +8.3% | +33.2% | +15.3% | +5.7% | +9.4% | +21.2% | +26.0% | +19.3% | +34.8% | +15.4% | +8.7% | +4.4% | +27.6% | +30.0% | −0.9% | +28.1% | +31.3% | +15.2% | +21.3% | −15.3% | +50.0% | +29.7% | +25.0% |
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −39.4% | −13.0% | +161% | +66.5% | +31.8% | +56.2% | +86.3% | −61.2% | −22.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TGT Target Corporation | 16 of 29 | −24.5% | −2.3% | −1.4% | −34.2% | +32.9% | +40.5% | +100% | +4.7% | −5.8% | +2.7% | −1.6% | +23.8% | +9.5% | +18.2% | −13.0% | +26.3% | +42.4% | −30.0% | −11.6% | +4.7% | +6.6% | +36.1% | +29.0% | −26.5% | +28.0% | −11.5% | +36.2% | +62.2% | +74.2% |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 17 of 29 | −11.0% | +16.6% | +3.8% | −5.5% | +2.1% | +27.2% | +18.6% | −19.2% | +17.9% | +0.4% | −1.6% | +8.4% | +27.6% | +15.9% | +18.1% | +0.4% | +22.9% | −10.1% | +22.0% | +21.5% | +9.6% | +4.1% | −3.0% | −8.0% | −9.4% | +0.4% | +41.6% | +28.0% | +62.3% |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 14 of 29 | −33.6% | −6.5% | +52.0% | −7.4% | +79.0% | −16.2% | +12.7% | +53.3% | +35.1% | +40.3% | −11.6% | −22.1% | +89.6% | +27.3% | −15.9% | +57.4% | +60.9% | −35.1% | −5.5% | +7.6% | +14.1% | −29.2% | +194% | +4.2% | +26.0% | +41.0% | +55.4% | −11.0% | +5.4% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 22 of 29 | −5.4% | +39.6% | +49.0% | −19.1% | +51.8% | +32.7% | +45.7% | +10.6% | +22.4% | +0.3% | +18.9% | +20.5% | +21.9% | +28.4% | +16.7% | +23.7% | +14.3% | −24.0% | +33.2% | +7.9% | +3.2% | +31.1% | +32.5% | −36.8% | +11.1% | −12.5% | +26.4% | +61.8% | +77.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 17 of 28 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% | −16.0% | +178% | +74.6% | −30.5% | −79.6% | +42.2% | +968% | — |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 15 of 29 | +24.5% | +74.0% | +12.9% | −0.5% | +1.9% | +23.4% | +30.1% | −3.4% | +46.6% | +16.1% | −26.6% | +11.8% | +18.2% | +17.1% | +13.8% | +3.1% | −2.5% | +20.0% | +4.9% | +0.2% | −10.2% | +0.6% | +5.6% | −11.8% | +8.9% | −22.7% | +70.5% | +107% | +74.6% |
| UL Unilever PLC | 14 of 29 | +5.8% | +20.9% | −0.2% | −2.8% | −7.6% | +9.1% | +12.9% | −2.4% | +40.2% | −2.6% | +9.7% | +1.9% | +10.1% | +19.6% | +12.9% | +0.6% | +44.1% | −36.3% | +38.6% | +30.9% | +5.3% | +9.2% | +1.3% | +18.0% | −1.0% | +17.6% | −31.0% | +31.5% | +45.2% |
| NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 12 of 29 | −60.5% | +18.9% | −30.9% | −37.0% | +6.8% | +16.7% | +9.5% | −37.5% | −29.3% | +2.9% | +17.9% | +19.9% | +49.0% | +41.0% | −9.5% | +22.8% | +57.9% | −60.3% | −8.0% | +25.8% | +1.8% | +10.2% | −22.4% | +13.0% | +25.2% | −18.9% | −28.2% | +1.2% | +37.2% |
| EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | 16 of 29 | +42.1% | −47.6% | −40.1% | −32.3% | +40.0% | +29.8% | +60.3% | +3.4% | +68.7% | −11.9% | +17.0% | +2.3% | +27.2% | +7.9% | +40.5% | +68.5% | +58.1% | −27.6% | +8.2% | +23.3% | −26.0% | +17.7% | +49.9% | −17.5% | −26.5% | −12.7% | +18.4% | +67.1% | +1.7% |
| EPC Edgewell Personal Care Company | 10 of 25 | −47.9% | −6.8% | −3.5% | −14.4% | +34.3% | +12.2% | −17.1% | −37.1% | −18.6% | −6.9% | −17.0% | +20.9% | +37.8% | +4.4% | +6.3% | +19.0% | +13.2% | −51.7% | +58.0% | +42.6% | +0.2% | +32.3% | +34.6% | +46.4% | −10.8% | — | — | — | — |
| HELE Helen of Troy Limited | 15 of 29 | −64.5% | −50.5% | +8.9% | −54.6% | +10.0% | +23.6% | +37.1% | +36.1% | +14.1% | −10.4% | +44.9% | +31.8% | +47.8% | +8.9% | +3.2% | +21.6% | +40.9% | +1.3% | −29.3% | +50.6% | −52.1% | +45.3% | +98.8% | −6.2% | +154% | −32.7% | −50.6% | −8.9% | +46.6% |
| COTY Coty Inc. | 5 of 12 | −55.8% | −44.0% | +45.1% | −18.5% | +49.6% | −36.9% | +79.2% | −65.7% | +11.7% | −27.4% | +25.2% | +37.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KVUE Kenvue Inc. | 0 of 2 | −15.8% | +3.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 12 of 29 | −19.9% | +11.8% | −7.1% | −1.6% | +9.7% | +0.9% | +24.6% | −2.1% | +9.0% | −7.7% | +13.8% | +18.9% | +27.9% | +19.1% | +21.6% | +3.3% | +26.1% | −21.0% | +5.2% | +17.5% | −6.8% | +18.1% | +27.9% | −19.0% | −13.8% | +10.2% | +22.3% | +12.9% | +5.5% |
| ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −40.1% | +14.4% | −2.2% | −13.2% | −2.2% | −13.8% | +14.3% | −3.9% | +10.1% | +34.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WD Walker & Dunlop, Inc. | 8 of 15 | −35.9% | −10.1% | +46.0% | −46.8% | +67.0% | +45.9% | +52.7% | −7.2% | +52.2% | +8.3% | +64.2% | +8.5% | −3.0% | +32.6% | +24.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CLX The Clorox Company | 17 of 29 | −35.6% | +17.7% | +5.0% | −17.0% | −11.5% | +34.5% | +2.2% | +6.6% | +24.7% | −3.0% | +25.0% | +15.9% | +30.8% | +13.9% | +8.8% | +7.2% | +13.7% | −12.1% | +3.9% | +14.9% | −1.6% | +23.9% | +20.5% | +6.5% | +14.1% | −28.1% | −12.5% | +49.4% | +61.2% |
Risk and diversification
How PG has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were PG's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents PG's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: PG fell 54.4% from January to March 2000, while the S&P 500 slipped only 3.0%.
- The slowest recovery came after PG fell 54.4% from January to March 2000; it did not regain that peak until May 2004, four years later.
- In three of PG's four worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
Green means PG fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | PG fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −54.4% | −3.0% | Jan 2000 | Mar 2000 | 2 months | May 2004 | 4.2 years |
| No named crash | −40.1% | — | Oct 1987 | Oct 1987 | Under a month | May 1989 | 19 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −39.0% | −53.1% | Dec 2007 | Mar 2009 | 15 months | Dec 2011 | 2.8 years |
| No named crash | −28.7% | −12.1% | Jul 1998 | Sep 1998 | 2 months | Nov 1998 | 2 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −25.5% | −5.1% | Dec 2014 | Sep 2015 | 9 months | Sep 2016 | 12 months |
How did PG do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far PG, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- PG fell less than the S&P 500 in all ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when PG fell 27.1% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, KMB held up best, falling less than PG in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than PG.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG This pageThe Procter & Gamble Company | — | −0.7% | −23.8% | −22.9% | −9.6% | −5.1% | −10.9% | −8.9% | −0.7% | −39.0% | −27.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 5 of 10 | 0.0% | −31.7% | −21.1% | −9.4% | −1.1% | −13.3% | −12.4% | −1.5% | −28.0% | −23.6% |
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 0 of 5 | −6.0% | −35.3% | −58.4% | −41.7% | −4.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| TGT Target Corporation | 2 of 10 | −3.4% | −43.9% | −21.7% | −30.3% | −3.0% | −15.8% | −10.4% | −1.3% | −60.6% | −42.6% |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 3 of 10 | −0.9% | −18.2% | −20.7% | −15.7% | −4.8% | −12.2% | −8.5% | −1.9% | −31.1% | −30.8% |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −1.6% | −37.9% | −49.1% | −13.7% | −4.4% | −25.9% | −38.2% | −3.0% | −80.9% | −52.1% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 1 of 10 | −3.1% | −31.4% | −13.7% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −15.2% | −13.5% | −1.2% | −48.0% | −50.1% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 2 of 10 | −0.8% | −25.7% | −13.1% | −18.3% | −4.9% | −22.3% | −10.5% | −1.5% | −26.2% | −31.8% |
| UL Unilever PLC | 3 of 10 | −0.2% | −19.1% | −25.3% | −8.0% | −7.7% | −15.2% | −11.8% | −2.7% | −53.5% | −21.5% |
| NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 0 of 10 | −12.1% | −44.9% | −46.2% | −29.5% | −6.7% | −29.9% | −27.8% | −2.2% | −83.2% | −33.9% |
| EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | 1 of 10 | −5.4% | −42.0% | −32.1% | −19.8% | −4.2% | −16.1% | −21.5% | −3.7% | −62.1% | −50.7% |
| EPC Edgewell Personal Care Company | 0 of 9 | −4.0% | −36.7% | −40.7% | −24.6% | −7.5% | −25.7% | −21.2% | −3.9% | −74.0% | — |
| HELE Helen of Troy Limited | 1 of 10 | −12.0% | −60.8% | −44.2% | −14.0% | −2.6% | −20.5% | −29.1% | −1.9% | −65.0% | −46.1% |
| COTY Coty Inc. | 1 of 6 | −5.4% | −43.5% | −67.5% | −52.6% | −4.3% | −28.2% | — | — | — | — |
| KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 6 of 10 | −0.2% | −22.2% | −23.7% | −12.4% | −4.1% | −11.6% | −7.8% | −0.1% | −35.0% | −26.5% |
| ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −5.7% | −37.6% | −44.8% | −30.4% | −5.5% | −29.6% | — | — | — | — |
| WD Walker & Dunlop, Inc. | 1 of 7 | −10.2% | −44.3% | −53.8% | −28.7% | −3.2% | −38.8% | −20.5% | — | — | — |
| CLX The Clorox Company | 4 of 10 | −1.2% | −33.4% | −14.0% | −12.6% | −3.0% | −8.6% | −13.2% | −1.5% | −28.4% | −37.3% |
How closely does PG move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares PG with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, PG captured 46% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 41% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.41. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only WMT, COST and CHD had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than PG's 1.13, out of 18 popular alternatives with the same record.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than PG's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG This pageThe Procter & Gamble Company | 46% | 41% | 1.13 | 0.41 |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 74% | 36% | 2.08 | 0.53 |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 93% | 50% | 1.85 | 0.77 |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 47% | 38% | 1.22 | 0.44 |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 105% | 108% | 0.97 | 1.02 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| TGT Target Corporation | 83% | 87% | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 133% | 171% | 0.78 | 1.81 |
| UL Unilever PLC | 46% | 60% | 0.77 | 0.45 |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 39% | 52% | 0.75 | 0.46 |
| WD Walker & Dunlop, Inc. | 108% | 170% | 0.63 | 1.42 |
| KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 27% | 48% | 0.57 | 0.39 |
| EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | 103% | 188% | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| CLX The Clorox Company | 31% | 73% | 0.43 | 0.40 |
| ENR Energizer Holdings, Inc. | 46% | 126% | 0.37 | 0.99 |
| HELE Helen of Troy Limited | 52% | 177% | 0.29 | 1.11 |
| COTY Coty Inc. | 39% | 212% | 0.18 | 1.70 |
| EPC Edgewell Personal Care Company | 13% | 93% | 0.15 | 0.68 |
| NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 5% | 135% | 0.04 | 0.92 |
What diversifies PG?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with PG's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing PG with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in PG into DBEF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 14% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+3.4% for PG alone, +5.6% for the mix).
- CAH made money in five of the six calendar years in which PG lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and SMH have moved largely independently of PG over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.42 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which PG lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% PG and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2023 | 2022 | 2015 | 2008 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company (this page) | 1.00 | +28.3% | 0.37 | −12.3% | −0.9% | −5.1% | −10.0% | −13.8% | −27.1% | 18.3% | +3.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.39 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +42.0% | +6.0% | +7.7% | −20.8% | — | 15.8% | +8.0% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.42 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +8.0% | +10.4% | −25.3% | — | — | 16.1% | +6.0% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.10 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | +73.4% | −33.5% | −0.3% | −44.7% | — | 16.8% | +10.7% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.46 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | +20.1% | −5.1% | +4.1% | — | — | 15.8% | +5.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.30 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | +12.7% | −0.8% | −10.7% | +4.9% | — | 16.0% | +6.6% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.30 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | +17.6% | −10.4% | — | — | — | 16.4% | +7.2% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.20 | +177% | 0.93 | +7.9% | −0.6% | +64.4% | −21.5% | −39.0% | +24.4% | 16.5% | +7.8% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.40 | +99.4% | 0.93 | +45.4% | +17.7% | −3.7% | — | — | — | 16.2% | +6.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2023 | 2022 | 2015 | 2008 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company (this page) | 1.00 | +28.3% | 0.37 | −12.3% | −0.9% | −5.1% | −10.0% | −13.8% | −27.1% | 18.3% | +3.4% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.39 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +34.1% | +54.1% | +12.6% | −39.6% | +108% | 17.4% | +10.1% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.03 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +160% | +1.3% | −6.0% | −20.5% | −2.3% | 19.1% | +22.6% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.21 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +79.6% | +17.0% | +67.7% | −15.2% | −71.1% | 18.7% | +18.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.37 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +24.1% | +51.8% | −4.5% | −40.4% | +61.2% | 17.2% | +9.6% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.17 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +30.4% | +86.6% | +17.4% | — | — | 17.0% | +12.2% |
Common questions
What was PG's worst drawdown?
PG's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 54.4%, from January to March 2000. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were PG's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, PG's best year was 1997, when it returned 50.5%. Its worst was 2000, with a return of -27.1%.
Is there a better investment than PG?
Among PG's popular alternatives, CL, ELF and CHD were ahead of PG in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PKG (packaging) was ahead of PG in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (25.8% volatility against 18.2%).
Is PG more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. PG's volatility over the past 5 years was 18.2%, 1.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PG's return lands within 18.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is PG's Sharpe ratio?
PG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.37, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PG earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is PG with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, PG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.33 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PG holding.
What are the best alternatives to PG?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed PG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CHD, ELF and TGT.
Did PG outperform the S&P 500?
PG finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -12.3%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did PG do in stock market crashes?
PG fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in ten of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in no. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when PG fell 27.1% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies PG?
These had a low correlation with PG over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.39), EMLP (correlation 0.42) and SMH (correlation 0.10); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.39), CLS (correlation 0.03) and FIX (correlation 0.21). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than PG's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of PG's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to PG
TGTTarget
CLColgate-Palmolive
COSTCostco Wholesale
AMZNAmazon.com
WMTWalmart
ULUnilever
ELEstée Lauder Companies