Relative Intelligence · Household & Personal Products

How Estée Lauder Companies (EL) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on EL alone. It places EL (The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.) against 17 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where EL stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: EL's full trading record, from November 1995 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowEL has run far ahead of the market, rising 37.3% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. On the flip side, it is 69.2% below its high, bear-market territory, while the S&P 500 sits 1.3% below a record. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?More than an industry move: EL rose 27.3% over the past 3 months, against 4.1% for the household & personal products ETF XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF). The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: EL rose 10.2% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, EL rose 5.0% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (18.3% against 89.3%). Even so, EL lagged its household & personal product peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termEL turned $10,000 into $14,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, EL has typically fallen 1.2 times as far as the S&P 500. The 2022 bear market took 42.0% off EL, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than PG (Procter & Gamble, 23.8%) but less than BBWI (Bath & Body Works, 62.8%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, EL has a correlation of 0.48 over 5 years, more closely than 68% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- ATR (AptarGroup, packaging) and WMT (Walmart, discount retail) earned more than EL with less volatility over the past 5 years. ATR returned 0.9% a year at 22.6% volatility, against a loss of 17.7% a year at 44.5%.
- Whole market
- 2,452 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than EL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in EL have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in EL over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of EL over the same span and EL's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in EL at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $109,782 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of EL, and AMZN finished highest, at $11,484,924.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 496 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of EL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- IPAR$725,262+7,153% total · +15.9% a year
- CHD$554,277+5,443% total · +14.8% a year
- TGT$184,797+1,748% total · +10.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- ATR$126,600+1,166% total · +9.1% a year
- EL$109,782+998% total · +8.6% a year
- CL$89,873+799% total · +7.9% a year
- PG$87,839+778% total · +7.8% a year
- M$20,889+109% total · +2.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 3,403 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of EL; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- TPR$35,288+253% total · +28.7% a year
- ELF$34,758+248% total · +28.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- IPAR$16,792+67.9% total · +10.9% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
- CL$12,718+27.2% total · +4.9% a year
- CHD$12,116+21.2% total · +3.9% a year
- PG$11,814+18.1% total · +3.4% a year
- TGT$8,005−20.0% total · −4.4% a year
- EL$3,341−66.6% total · −19.7% a year
EL at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- EL is still 69.2% below its all-time high.
- EL's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 85.8%, from January 2022 to April 2025. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
- Over 29 full calendar years, EL's best was 2017, when it returned 68.7%, and its worst was 2024, when it lost 47.6%. It lost money in nine of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $38B
- Industry
- Household & Personal Products
- Price history from
- November 1995
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +5.0%total return
- Past 3 years
- −18.3%−6.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- −62.3%−17.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +39.8%+3.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +68.7%2017
- Worst calendar year
- −47.6%2024
- Losing years
- 9 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 44.5%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- -0.21return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −85.8%Jan 2022 to Apr 2025
- From its all-time high
- −69.2%below the peak
EL against the whole market
Where EL ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does EL rank among all stocks?
This section ranks EL on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how EL stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), EL ranks in the bottom 7% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | EL | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +5.0% | 1,775 of 3,287 | bottom 47% |
| 3-year return | −18.3% | 2,568 of 3,017 | bottom 16% |
| 5-year return | −62.3% | 2,532 of 2,893 | bottom 13% |
| 10-year return | +39.8% | 1,631 of 2,202 | bottom 27% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 44.5% | 1,680 of 2,893 | bottom 43% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | -0.21 | 2,704 of 2,893 | bottom 8% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −85.8% | 1,808 of 2,187 | bottom 18% |
What has beaten EL on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). EL sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than EL with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 1,462 stocks and 990 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than EL over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 67% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half EL's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 44% less than EL's 44.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against -0.21 for EL. INSW earned the most, 56.5% a year, while still swinging less than EL (40.5% against 44.5%).
- Among EL's popular alternatives, TPR, IPAR and ULTA are in the region. TPR earned 28.1% a year against a loss of 17.7% a year for EL, at 40.8% volatility, 9% less than EL's 44.5%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to EL; faint dots are 92 more of the 2,452 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than EL?
Investments that beat EL over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among EL's popular alternatives, PG, CL and CHD earned more than EL with less volatility over the past 5 years. PG returned 5.1% a year at 18.2% volatility, against a loss of 17.7% a year at 44.5%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ATR (packaging) and WMT (discount retail) earned more than EL with less volatility over the past 5 years. ATR returned 0.9% a year at 22.6% volatility, against a loss of 17.7% a year at 44.5%.
- Across the whole market, 2,452 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than EL with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat EL over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks EL's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than EL follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than EL's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× EL's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than EL's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with EL?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| −17.7% | 44.5% | -0.21 | −85.8% | +39.8% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.48 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against EL. 9 of 15 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +5.1% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | +145% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +7.2% | 19.2% | 0.46 | −29.0% | +68.8% | 0.29 | — | ||
CHDChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. · Household & Personal Products | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +6.1% | 21.1% | 0.39 | −31.7% | +154% | 0.38 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +548% | 0.32 | — | ||
TPRTapestry, Inc. · Luxury Goods | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +28.1% | 40.8% | 0.82 | −78.9% | +328% | 0.40 | — | |
ELFe.l.f. Beauty, Inc. · Household & Personal Products | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.2% | 58.5% | 0.77 | −77.3% | +331% | 0.30 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Household & Personal Products and the categories next to it (Discount Retail, Packaging, Consumer Health, E-Commerce), plus EL's specific themes. 25 of 31 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
ATRAptarGroup, Inc. · Packaging | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +0.9% | 22.6% | 0.15 | −39.8% | +89.0% | 0.17 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.03 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +5.5% | 21.5% | 0.36 | −30.1% | +89.8% | 0.36 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +11.7% | 32.9% | 0.50 | −53.6% | +374% | 0.46 | — | ||
FIVEFive Below, Inc. · Discount Retail | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +3.6% | 47.7% | 0.32 | −76.4% | +493% | 0.44 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 2,920 of 3,589 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +2.9% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | +366% | 0.55 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.09 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.03 | — | ||
SAFTSafety Insurance Group, Inc. · Insurance - Property & Casualty | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +10.6% | 28.5% | 0.49 | −32.8% | +138% | 0.03 | — | |
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.25 | 0.58% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.32 | 0.40% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.00 | — | ||
POOLPool Corporation · Industrial Distribution | Similar return, lower volatility | −16.8% | 34.9% | -0.35 | −71.4% | +113% | 0.37 | — | |
What these numbers mean for EL
- Annual return
- EL lost 17.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $3,770. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- EL's volatility over the past 5 years was 44.5%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, EL's return lands within 44.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- EL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.21, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so EL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- EL's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 85.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 85.8% fall takes a 605% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, EL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.48 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against EL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a EL holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2,452 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than EL with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with EL | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +2.9% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | +366% | 0.55 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.09 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.03 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.04 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.02 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | 0.02 | — | |
| 7 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.01 | — |
| 8 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.08 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.06 | — | |
| 10 | SAFTSafety Insurance Group, Inc. · Insurance - Property & Casualty | Whole market | +10.6% | 28.5% | 0.49 | −32.8% | +138% | 0.03 | — |
| 11 | Whole market | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.40 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +18.6% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | +304% | 0.39 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.29 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.25 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.00 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +2.2% | 29.4% | 0.23 | −50.4% | +307% | 0.16 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.25 | — | |
| 18 | DINOHF Sinclair Corporation · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +31.8% | 38.8% | 0.91 | −77.3% | +649% | 0.10 | — |
| 19 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.10 | — | |
| 20 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | 0.18 | — |
| 21 | Whole market | +2.6% | 30.6% | 0.24 | −43.2% | +306% | 0.55 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | −0.1% | 39.6% | 0.19 | −55.7% | +715% | 0.39 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | −0.3% | 38.5% | 0.19 | −69.9% | +166% | 0.17 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +1.3% | 34.7% | 0.21 | −51.5% | +260% | 0.51 | — | |
| 25 | EXELExelixis, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +24.4% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | +448% | -0.09 | — |
| 26 | Whole market | −6.0% | 41.7% | 0.06 | −63.4% | +132% | 0.23 | — | |
| 27 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +1,196% | 0.17 | — |
| 28 | CNCCentene Corp. · Managed Health Care | Whole market | +0.8% | 40.0% | 0.24 | −74.1% | +129% | 0.23 | — |
| 29 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.25 | 0.58% |
| 30 | HPQHP Inc. · Computer Hardware | Whole market | +5.7% | 37.3% | 0.33 | −51.2% | +207% | 0.23 | — |
| 31 | MTDMettler-Toledo International Inc. · Life Sciences Tools | Whole market | +2.6% | 32.5% | 0.24 | −43.5% | +298% | 0.49 | — |
| 32 | CACICACI International Inc · Business Services | Whole market | +16.6% | 29.9% | 0.66 | −42.9% | +499% | 0.19 | — |
| 33 | WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. · Medical Supplies | Whole market | −1.0% | 40.7% | 0.19 | −59.3% | +455% | 0.29 | — |
| 34 | HASHasbro, Inc. · Toys & Games | Whole market | +8.0% | 33.3% | 0.40 | −63.8% | +85.0% | 0.31 | — |
| 35 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | 0.34 | — |
| 36 | TXTernium S.A. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +13.7% | 34.8% | 0.54 | −74.9% | +393% | 0.54 | — |
| 37 | BBYBest Buy Co., Inc. · Specialty Retail | Whole market | +0.7% | 38.1% | 0.21 | −52.6% | +242% | 0.29 | — |
| 38 | GMABGenmab A/S · Biotechnology | Whole market | −3.1% | 34.1% | 0.08 | −63.1% | +130% | 0.22 | — |
| 39 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.32 | 0.40% | |
| 40 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.05 | — |
| 41 | MANHManhattan Associates, Inc. · Enterprise Software | Whole market | +6.5% | 40.2% | 0.36 | −61.0% | +344% | 0.22 | — |
| 42 | DTDynatrace, Inc. · Application Software | Whole market | −3.6% | 41.6% | 0.12 | −61.8% | — | 0.11 | — |
| 43 | RVTYRevvity, Inc. · Life Sciences Tools | Whole market | −2.2% | 35.1% | 0.11 | −59.0% | +203% | 0.48 | — |
| 44 | CAKEThe Cheesecake Factory Incorporated · Restaurants | Whole market | +25.8% | 39.9% | 0.78 | −75.6% | +187% | 0.28 | — |
| 45 | DHTDHT Holdings, Inc. · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +38.7% | 39.0% | 1.04 | −39.7% | +1,050% | 0.05 | — |
| 46 | FLRTPacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF · Financials | Whole market | +6.0% | 2.3% | 2.55 | −21.0% | +58.0% | 0.30 | 0.60% |
| 47 | Whole market | +3.8% | 0.3% | 13.25 | −0.3% | — | -0.03 | 0.09% | |
| 48 | AAMIAcadian Asset Management · Asset Management | Whole market | +29.0% | 35.6% | 0.90 | −78.1% | +652% | 0.32 | — |
| 49 | ITGartner, Inc. · IT Services | Whole market | −7.0% | 38.5% | 0.01 | −77.2% | +152% | 0.20 | — |
| 50 | Whole market | +9.8% | 25.2% | 0.50 | −39.4% | +60.7% | 0.05 | — | |
| 51 | MOHMolina Healthcare, Inc. · Managed Health Care | Whole market | −5.4% | 40.6% | 0.07 | −70.8% | +277% | 0.05 | — |
| 52 | DBXDropbox, Inc. · Application Software | Whole market | +3.9% | 34.4% | 0.29 | −62.6% | — | 0.13 | — |
| 53 | SAICScience Applications International Corporation · Business Services | Whole market | +9.9% | 30.7% | 0.46 | −45.9% | +135% | 0.08 | — |
| 54 | BOXBox, Inc. · Enterprise Software | Whole market | +10.1% | 33.3% | 0.46 | −68.6% | +176% | 0.13 | — |
| 55 | HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc. · Consulting Services | Whole market | +29.7% | 40.7% | 0.84 | −51.4% | +221% | 0.07 | — |
| 56 | HAEHaemonetics Corporation · Medical Devices | Whole market | +10.7% | 41.0% | 0.45 | −68.6% | +241% | 0.21 | — |
| 57 | NSITInsight Enterprises, Inc. · IT Services | Whole market | +11.8% | 33.6% | 0.50 | −71.4% | +393% | 0.36 | — |
| 58 | Whole market | +2.7% | 22.9% | 0.23 | −41.2% | +55.8% | 0.16 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.30 | — | |
| 60 | APLEApple Hospitality REIT, Inc. · Hotel REITs | Whole market | +9.0% | 26.8% | 0.46 | −71.9% | +68.3% | 0.19 | — |
| 61 | HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +12.6% | 25.8% | 0.59 | −38.7% | +373% | 0.23 | 0.60% |
| 62 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.10 | — | |
| 63 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.04 | — |
| 64 | IMAXIMAX Corporation · Entertainment | Whole market | +20.2% | 40.1% | 0.66 | −79.4% | +65.3% | 0.16 | — |
| 65 | PCTYPaylocity Holding Corporation · Application Software | Whole market | −10.1% | 41.1% | -0.06 | −68.9% | +288% | 0.20 | — |
| 66 | ITGRInteger Holdings Corporation · Medical Devices | Whole market | +6.9% | 35.3% | 0.37 | −56.1% | +557% | 0.15 | — |
| 67 | OPCHOption Care Health, Inc. · Health Care Services | Whole market | +4.4% | 41.0% | 0.31 | −66.7% | +165% | 0.41 | — |
| 68 | Whole market | −0.5% | 19.1% | 0.07 | −30.3% | +72.6% | 0.29 | — | |
| 69 | CRVLCorVel Corporation · Insurance | Whole market | +7.0% | 33.2% | 0.37 | −64.2% | +594% | 0.20 | — |
| 70 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.14 | — | |
| 71 | CBZCBIZ, Inc. · Specialty Business Services | Whole market | +9.3% | 36.1% | 0.43 | −71.6% | +392% | 0.19 | — |
| 72 | Whole market | −3.8% | 29.1% | 0.01 | −43.8% | +232% | 0.42 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +6.5% | 28.8% | 0.36 | −57.4% | +76.0% | 0.32 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.23 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.13 | — | |
| 76 | UFCSUnited Fire Group, Inc. · Insurance - Property & Casualty | Whole market | +23.7% | 39.1% | 0.74 | −64.5% | +86.7% | 0.16 | — |
| 77 | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +114% | 0.07 | — | |
| 78 | IDTIDT Corporation · Telecommunications Services | Whole market | +12.3% | 38.5% | 0.49 | −77.1% | +429% | 0.08 | — |
| 79 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.18 | — | |
| 80 | JAAAJanus Henderson AAA CLO ETF · CLO Bonds | Whole market | +5.1% | 1.7% | 2.98 | −2.6% | — | 0.22 | 0.20% |
| 81 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.28 | 0.61% |
| 82 | BUGGlobal X - Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +7.1% | 30.4% | 0.38 | −41.7% | — | 0.19 | 0.50% |
| 83 | CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. · Integrated Telecommunications | Whole market | +7.7% | 13.3% | 0.63 | −23.8% | +101% | 0.35 | — |
| 84 | TNETTriNet Group, Inc. · Staffing & Employment Services | Whole market | −5.2% | 38.1% | 0.05 | −74.0% | +277% | 0.28 | — |
| 85 | Whole market | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.26 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +6.5% | 20.9% | 0.41 | −34.4% | +156% | 0.08 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +12.3% | 27.3% | 0.56 | −43.8% | +151% | 0.06 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.16 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +3.2% | 24.1% | 0.25 | −37.9% | +107% | 0.26 | — | |
| 90 | WKCWorld Kinect Corporation · Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Whole market | +5.0% | 34.5% | 0.32 | −57.9% | −6.6% | 0.28 | — |
| 91 | HYGHiShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF · Bonds | Whole market | +6.6% | 7.1% | 0.94 | −23.9% | +74.5% | 0.29 | 1.12% |
| 92 | Whole market | +6.1% | 20.0% | 0.40 | −31.6% | +270% | 0.10 | — | |
| 93 | GICGlobal Industrial Co · Industrial - Distribution | Whole market | +5.3% | 39.0% | 0.33 | −55.7% | +995% | 0.24 | — |
| 94 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.12 | — |
| 95 | MYEMyers Industries, Inc. · Packaging & Containers | Whole market | +12.7% | 39.1% | 0.50 | −70.0% | +254% | 0.27 | — |
| 96 | BNOUnited States Brent Oil Fund LP · Commodities | Whole market | +24.2% | 37.1% | 0.77 | −75.2% | +348% | -0.13 | 1.15% |
| 97 | SPSCSPS Commerce, Inc. · Software - Application | Whole market | −11.6% | 40.6% | -0.10 | −76.8% | +157% | 0.21 | — |
| 98 | Whole market | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.31 | — | |
| 99 | SCSCScanSource, Inc. · Technology Distributors | Whole market | +10.5% | 36.3% | 0.46 | −67.5% | +67.8% | 0.23 | — |
| 100 | RLJRLJ Lodging Trust · REIT - Hotel & Motel | Whole market | +1.2% | 32.8% | 0.20 | −79.5% | −8.9% | 0.24 | — |
EL against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against EL, compared period by period and year by year.
How do EL's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at EL, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Eight of the 15 popular alternatives, led by TPR, IPAR and ULTA, were both more rewarding and calmer than EL over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, EL returned -17.7% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (44.5% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than EL with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | +31.2% | 58.5% |
| TPR Tapestry, Inc. | +28.1% | 40.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | +11.6% | 33.7% |
| ULTA Ulta Beauty, Inc. | +11.0% | 34.4% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | +7.2% | 19.2% |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | +6.1% | 21.1% |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | +5.1% | 18.3% |
| M Macy's, Inc. | +1.5% | 52.4% |
| TGT Target Corporation | −6.5% | 36.1% |
| COTY Coty Inc. | −16.1% | 45.3% |
| EL This pageThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | −17.7% | 44.5% |
| BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | −19.2% | 51.7% |
| HLF Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. | −21.3% | 61.2% |
| USNA USANA Health Sciences, Inc. | −31.8% | 40.4% |
| NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | −32.0% | 47.5% |
Has EL consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares EL with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than EL helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- ELF outperformed EL in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the 17 popular alternatives, ELF and CHD, outperformed EL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- TPR, ELF and IPAR earned more for the risk they took than EL (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than EL over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (this page) | — | +10.2% | +27.3% | +37.3% | +0.4% | +5.0% | −18.3% | −62.3% | +39.8% | 44.5% | -0.21 | −85.8% | — | $38B | — |
| ELF Qualifiede.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +17.3% | +44.1% | +67.7% | +47.5% | −10.0% | +12.6% | +289% | +331% | 58.5% | 0.77 | −77.3% | — | $6.8B | — |
| CHD QualifiedChurch & Dwight Co., Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +11.0% | +8.7% | +10.4% | +29.4% | +21.9% | +21.9% | +34.6% | +154% | 21.1% | 0.39 | −31.7% | — | $25B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| IPAR Household & Personal ProductsInter Parfums, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +2.8% | −6.2% | +20.0% | +38.9% | +21.2% | +1.3% | +72.8% | +350% | 33.7% | 0.49 | −54.9% | — | $3.7B | — |
| TGT Discount StoresTarget Corporation | 2/5 short3/3 long | −2.4% | +11.2% | +20.3% | +57.4% | +75.1% | +58.0% | −28.5% | +207% | 36.1% | 0.00 | −64.4% | — | $70B | — |
| PG Household & Personal ProductsThe Procter & Gamble Company | 2/5 short3/3 long | +9.1% | +7.7% | +12.0% | +14.9% | +8.0% | +15.8% | +28.3% | +145% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | — | $370B | — |
| CL Household & Personal ProductsColgate-Palmolive Company | 2/5 short3/3 long | +10.2% | +3.4% | +14.5% | +24.6% | +22.9% | +38.3% | +41.8% | +68.8% | 19.2% | 0.46 | −29.0% | — | $75B | — |
| ULTA Specialty RetailUlta Beauty, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | +8.1% | +23.5% | +5.4% | −2.8% | +15.1% | +62.1% | +68.3% | +137% | 34.4% | 0.48 | −64.9% | — | $26B | — |
| TPR Luxury GoodsTapestry, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | +3.9% | −16.4% | −23.0% | −8.1% | +2.3% | +346% | +245% | +328% | 40.8% | 0.82 | −78.9% | — | $23B | — |
| M Department StoresMacy's, Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | +5.5% | +1.3% | +19.3% | +5.7% | +34.8% | +131% | +7.7% | +0.7% | 52.4% | 0.29 | −87.8% | — | $6.1B | — |
| HLF Packaged FoodsHerbalife Nutrition Ltd. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +15.5% | +12.3% | −18.9% | +7.4% | +59.7% | −3.0% | −69.7% | −56.0% | 61.2% | -0.09 | −91.7% | — | $1.4B | — |
| ODD Household & Personal ProductsOddity Tech Ltd. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +28.6% | +44.4% | +59.6% | −40.4% | −54.4% | −13.0% | — | — | — | — | −87.3% | — | $1.3B | — |
| COTY Household & Personal ProductsCoty Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +28.3% | +19.3% | +35.9% | +3.5% | −22.0% | −66.1% | −58.3% | −84.3% | 45.3% | -0.16 | −91.0% | — | $2.8B | — |
| KVUE Household & Personal ProductsKenvue Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +9.1% | +3.7% | +13.5% | +16.6% | +36.7% | +12.0% | — | — | — | — | −44.1% | — | $37B | — |
| BBWI Specialty RetailBath & Body Works, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +21.5% | +1.2% | +0.4% | +2.1% | −16.8% | −27.8% | −65.6% | −51.0% | 51.7% | -0.16 | −85.2% | — | $4.1B | — |
| USNA Packaged FoodsUSANA Health Sciences, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +1.6% | −34.3% | −28.7% | −24.3% | −28.8% | −73.7% | −85.2% | −80.0% | 40.4% | -0.73 | −90.6% | — | $272M | — |
| NUS Household & Personal ProductsNu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +6.4% | −5.3% | −34.9% | −47.1% | −52.3% | −71.8% | −85.5% | −89.2% | 47.5% | -0.58 | −93.0% | — | $242M | — |
How did EL do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where EL ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with EL and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- EL finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, ULTA came out ahead of EL most often, in 12 of the 18 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, EL finished in the top quarter in five of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in six. In 2025, it ranked 4 of 18.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of EL; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places EL among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of EL | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EL This pageThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | — | +42.1% | −47.6% | −40.1% | −32.3% | +40.0% | +29.8% | +60.3% | +3.4% | +68.7% | −11.9% | +17.0% | +2.3% | +27.2% | +7.9% | +40.5% | +68.5% | +58.1% | −27.6% | +8.2% | +23.3% | −26.0% | +17.7% | +49.9% | −17.5% | −26.5% | −12.7% | +18.4% | +67.1% | +1.7% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 29 | 4 of 18 | 16 of 18 | 15 of 16 | 11 of 16 | 6 of 16 | 6 of 16 | 4 of 16 | 10 of 16 | 1 of 16 | 13 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 10 of 15 | 9 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 5 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 9 of 14 | 5 of 14 | 5 of 13 | 6 of 13 | 12 of 13 | 7 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 10 of 12 | 11 of 12 | 4 of 11 | 8 of 11 | 2 of 11 | 8 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −39.4% | −13.0% | +161% | +66.5% | +31.8% | +56.2% | +86.3% | −61.2% | −22.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 16 of 29 | −18.9% | +12.0% | +18.7% | −20.4% | +18.9% | +25.5% | +8.3% | +33.2% | +15.3% | +5.7% | +9.4% | +21.2% | +26.0% | +19.3% | +34.8% | +15.4% | +8.7% | +4.4% | +27.6% | +30.0% | −0.9% | +28.1% | +31.3% | +15.2% | +21.3% | −15.3% | +50.0% | +29.7% | +25.0% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 15 of 28 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% | −16.0% | +178% | +74.6% | −30.5% | −79.6% | +42.2% | +968% | — |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 16 of 29 | −33.6% | −6.5% | +52.0% | −7.4% | +79.0% | −16.2% | +12.7% | +53.3% | +35.1% | +40.3% | −11.6% | −22.1% | +89.6% | +27.3% | −15.9% | +57.4% | +60.9% | −35.1% | −5.5% | +7.6% | +14.1% | −29.2% | +194% | +4.2% | +26.0% | +41.0% | +55.4% | −11.0% | +5.4% |
| TGT Target Corporation | 14 of 29 | −24.5% | −2.3% | −1.4% | −34.2% | +32.9% | +40.5% | +100% | +4.7% | −5.8% | +2.7% | −1.6% | +23.8% | +9.5% | +18.2% | −13.0% | +26.3% | +42.4% | −30.0% | −11.6% | +4.7% | +6.6% | +36.1% | +29.0% | −26.5% | +28.0% | −11.5% | +36.2% | +62.2% | +74.2% |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 12 of 29 | −12.3% | +17.3% | −0.9% | −5.1% | +20.5% | +14.2% | +39.7% | +3.6% | +12.7% | +9.3% | −10.0% | +15.4% | +23.6% | +5.2% | +7.0% | +9.3% | +1.2% | −13.8% | +16.7% | +13.4% | +7.2% | +12.4% | +18.5% | +11.4% | +3.1% | −27.1% | +21.6% | +16.0% | +50.5% |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 14 of 29 | −11.0% | +16.6% | +3.8% | −5.5% | +2.1% | +27.2% | +18.6% | −19.2% | +17.9% | +0.4% | −1.6% | +8.4% | +27.6% | +15.9% | +18.1% | +0.4% | +22.9% | −10.1% | +22.0% | +21.5% | +9.6% | +4.1% | −3.0% | −8.0% | −9.4% | +0.4% | +41.6% | +28.0% | +62.3% |
| ULTA Ulta Beauty, Inc. | 12 of 18 | +39.1% | −11.2% | +4.5% | +13.8% | +43.6% | +13.4% | +3.4% | +9.5% | −12.3% | +37.8% | +44.7% | +32.5% | −1.8% | +53.0% | +91.0% | +87.2% | +119% | −51.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TPR Tapestry, Inc. | 12 of 25 | +98.7% | +82.8% | +0.1% | −3.3% | +32.3% | +16.8% | −15.9% | −21.4% | +30.5% | +10.8% | −9.3% | −30.7% | +3.6% | −7.4% | +11.9% | +53.3% | +77.2% | −32.1% | −28.8% | +28.8% | +18.2% | +49.3% | +130% | +68.9% | +35.6% | — | — | — | — |
| M Macy's, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +36.4% | −12.4% | +1.6% | −18.7% | +136% | −31.1% | −38.2% | +23.6% | −25.3% | +6.5% | −45.4% | +25.6% | +39.6% | +23.8% | +28.8% | +52.4% | +64.5% | −58.7% | −31.1% | +16.6% | +16.1% | +23.9% | +65.3% | −29.7% | +16.8% | −30.8% | +16.1% | +1.2% | +26.2% |
| HLF Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. | 10 of 21 | +92.7% | −56.2% | +2.5% | −63.6% | −14.8% | +0.8% | −19.1% | +74.1% | +40.7% | −10.2% | +42.2% | −51.9% | +145% | −34.8% | +53.0% | +71.5% | +93.2% | −44.7% | +1.7% | +23.6% | +100% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ODD Oddity Tech Ltd. | 1 of 2 | −4.4% | −9.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| COTY Coty Inc. | 7 of 12 | −55.8% | −44.0% | +45.1% | −18.5% | +49.6% | −36.9% | +79.2% | −65.7% | +11.7% | −27.4% | +25.2% | +37.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KVUE Kenvue Inc. | 1 of 2 | −15.8% | +3.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | 18 of 29 | −46.5% | −8.3% | +4.7% | −38.4% | +134% | +108% | −25.3% | −54.3% | −3.9% | −25.4% | +18.5% | +48.7% | +34.5% | +30.0% | +45.6% | +87.9% | +102% | −44.5% | −32.6% | +32.4% | −0.2% | +38.8% | +33.4% | −3.8% | −12.0% | −20.2% | +60.5% | +16.8% | +42.4% |
| USNA USANA Health Sciences, Inc. | 14 of 29 | −45.3% | −33.0% | +0.8% | −47.4% | +31.3% | −1.8% | −33.3% | +59.0% | +21.0% | −4.2% | +24.6% | +35.7% | +129% | +8.4% | −30.1% | +36.2% | −6.8% | −7.7% | −28.2% | +34.7% | +12.2% | +11.8% | +408% | +895% | −19.3% | −70.0% | −50.6% | +11.5% | +0.9% |
| NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 9 of 29 | +43.3% | −63.7% | −51.0% | −13.9% | −4.3% | +38.7% | −31.0% | −8.3% | +46.5% | +30.5% | −10.4% | −67.5% | +280% | −22.4% | +63.0% | +14.6% | +165% | −34.5% | −7.6% | +6.2% | −29.6% | +50.5% | +46.4% | +39.6% | +69.4% | −41.4% | −61.7% | +29.5% | −40.9% |
Risk and diversification
How EL has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were EL's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents EL's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1995, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of EL's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: EL fell 85.8% from January 2022 to April 2025, while the S&P 500 rose 9.0%.
- The slowest recovery came after EL fell 53.3% from July 1999 to December 2002; it did not regain that peak until September 2008, six years later.
Green means EL fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | EL fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −85.8% | +9.0% | Jan 2022 | Apr 2025 | 3.3 years | Not yet | — |
| 2008 financial crisis | −62.1% | −45.6% | Sep 2008 | Mar 2009 | 6 months | Jan 2010 | 10 months |
| Dot-com bust | −53.3% | −35.6% | Jul 1999 | Dec 2002 | 3.4 years | Sep 2008 | 5.8 years |
| Covid crash | −34.2% | −32.4% | Jan 2020 | Mar 2020 | 2 months | Aug 2020 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −33.0% | −11.8% | Apr 1998 | Oct 1998 | 6 months | Nov 1998 | 1 month |
How did EL do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far EL, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- EL fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when EL fell 42.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, CHD held up best, falling less than EL in all ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than EL.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EL This pageThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | — | −5.4% | −42.0% | −32.1% | −19.8% | −4.2% | −16.1% | −21.5% | −3.7% | −62.1% | −50.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −6.0% | −35.3% | −58.4% | −41.7% | −4.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 10 of 10 | 0.0% | −31.7% | −21.1% | −9.4% | −1.1% | −13.3% | −12.4% | −1.5% | −28.0% | −23.6% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −1.6% | −37.9% | −49.1% | −13.7% | −4.4% | −25.9% | −38.2% | −3.0% | −80.9% | −52.1% |
| TGT Target Corporation | 7 of 10 | −3.4% | −43.9% | −21.7% | −30.3% | −3.0% | −15.8% | −10.4% | −1.3% | −60.6% | −42.6% |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 9 of 10 | −0.7% | −23.8% | −22.9% | −9.6% | −5.1% | −10.9% | −8.9% | −0.7% | −39.0% | −27.1% |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 9 of 10 | −0.9% | −18.2% | −20.7% | −15.7% | −4.8% | −12.2% | −8.5% | −1.9% | −31.1% | −30.8% |
| ULTA Ulta Beauty, Inc. | 2 of 8 | −2.0% | −20.7% | −57.4% | −27.1% | −4.7% | −18.8% | −25.9% | −3.5% | — | — |
| TPR Tapestry, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −4.6% | −35.9% | −62.8% | −35.3% | −2.5% | −16.1% | −31.2% | −2.1% | −74.1% | — |
| M Macy's, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −11.4% | −44.6% | −69.9% | −24.6% | −5.7% | −48.1% | −24.4% | −2.2% | −83.2% | −46.4% |
| HLF Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. | 4 of 9 | −7.8% | −56.6% | −39.5% | −7.5% | −2.4% | −28.6% | −18.2% | −0.8% | −74.5% | — |
| COTY Coty Inc. | 0 of 6 | −5.4% | −43.5% | −67.5% | −52.6% | −4.3% | −28.2% | — | — | — | — |
| BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −6.6% | −62.8% | −62.3% | −32.1% | −3.2% | −18.6% | −21.1% | −0.8% | −70.5% | −65.4% |
| USNA USANA Health Sciences, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −0.8% | −45.7% | −38.9% | −15.0% | −3.9% | −42.2% | −25.7% | −1.8% | −62.4% | −80.7% |
| NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −1.3% | −38.6% | −57.4% | −33.6% | −4.7% | −36.3% | −14.3% | 0.0% | −57.6% | −52.4% |
How closely does EL move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares EL with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Nine of the 15 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than EL's 0.55, led by CHD, PG and IPAR.
- TGT took just 87% of the S&P 500's losses, against 188% for EL, while still keeping 83% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, EL captured 103% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 188% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.14. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than EL's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EL This pageThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc. | 103% | 188% | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 47% | 38% | 1.22 | 0.44 |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 46% | 41% | 1.13 | 0.41 |
| IPAR Inter Parfums, Inc. | 105% | 108% | 0.97 | 1.02 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| TGT Target Corporation | 83% | 87% | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| TPR Tapestry, Inc. | 119% | 136% | 0.88 | 1.46 |
| ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. | 133% | 171% | 0.78 | 1.81 |
| CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 39% | 52% | 0.75 | 0.46 |
| ULTA Ulta Beauty, Inc. | 101% | 141% | 0.72 | 1.25 |
| M Macy's, Inc. | 93% | 183% | 0.51 | 1.75 |
| BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | 62% | 184% | 0.34 | 1.59 |
| HLF Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. | 32% | 126% | 0.25 | 0.89 |
| COTY Coty Inc. | 39% | 212% | 0.18 | 1.70 |
| NUS Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. | 18% | 191% | 0.10 | 1.09 |
| USNA USANA Health Sciences, Inc. | 2% | 110% | 0.02 | 0.78 |
What diversifies EL?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with EL's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing EL with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in EL into MCK would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (-19.7% for EL alone, -9.0% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of EL over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.36 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in six of the nine calendar years in which EL lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which EL lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% EL and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2016 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −62.3% | -0.21 | −47.6% | −40.1% | −32.3% | −11.9% | −27.6% | −26.0% | −17.5% | −26.5% | −12.7% | 41.8% | −19.7% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.36 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +17.4% | +3.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34.2% | −12.1% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.35 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +42.0% | +6.0% | +1.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 34.4% | −10.6% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.18 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +8.0% | +10.4% | +29.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 34.1% | −12.2% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.27 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +1.8% | +7.1% | +15.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 34.3% | −12.8% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.35 | +140% | 0.97 | +5.7% | +30.3% | −5.2% | −1.8% | −36.8% | +4.6% | −13.6% | −9.2% | −11.8% | 34.9% | −11.6% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.36 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +73.4% | −33.5% | +35.6% | −44.7% | +10.8% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 36.5% | −8.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.32 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | +12.7% | −0.8% | +8.0% | +4.9% | +17.8% | — | — | — | 34.7% | −11.9% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.36 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +17.6% | −10.4% | +7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 35.1% | −11.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2016 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EL The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | −62.3% | -0.21 | −47.6% | −40.1% | −32.3% | −11.9% | −27.6% | −26.0% | −17.5% | −26.5% | −12.7% | 41.8% | −19.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.13 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +34.1% | +54.1% | −17.5% | −39.6% | +18.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | 34.5% | −8.7% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.11 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +160% | +1.3% | +7.4% | −20.5% | −25.2% | −65.1% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 36.6% | +1.6% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.27 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +79.6% | +17.0% | +18.3% | −15.2% | +20.1% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 36.9% | −2.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.02 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +24.1% | +51.8% | −28.3% | −40.4% | +64.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 33.7% | −9.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.09 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +30.4% | +86.6% | +0.7% | — | — | — | — | — | 34.6% | −6.9% |
Common questions
What was EL's worst drawdown?
EL's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 85.8%, from January 2022 to April 2025. It has not yet climbed back to that peak.
What were EL's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, EL's best year was 2017, when it returned 68.7%. Its worst was 2024, with a return of -47.6%.
Is there a better investment than EL?
Among EL's popular alternatives, PG, CL and CHD earned more than EL with less volatility over the past 5 years. PG returned 5.1% a year at 18.2% volatility, against a loss of 17.7% a year at 44.5%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ATR (packaging) and WMT (discount retail) earned more than EL with less volatility over the past 5 years. ATR returned 0.9% a year at 22.6% volatility, against a loss of 17.7% a year at 44.5%.
Is EL more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. EL's volatility over the past 5 years was 44.5%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, EL's return lands within 44.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is EL's Sharpe ratio?
EL's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was -0.21, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so EL earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is EL with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, EL's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.48 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against EL instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a EL holding.
What are the best alternatives to EL?
Of the 17 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed EL in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: ELF and CHD.
Did EL outperform the S&P 500?
EL finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +42.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did EL do in stock market crashes?
EL fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when EL fell 42.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies EL?
These had a low correlation with EL over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.36), DXJ (correlation 0.35) and EMLP (correlation 0.18); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.13), CLS (correlation 0.11) and FIX (correlation 0.27). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than EL's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of EL's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.