Relative Intelligence · Health Care Distribution

How Cardinal Health (CAH) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CAH alone. It places CAH (Cardinal Health, Inc.) against 8 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CAH stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: CAH's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, CAH rose 22.5% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Both CAH and the S&P 500 are within a few percent of a record high. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?CAH's 14.3% gain over the past 3 months far outran its industry: the health care distribution ETF IHF (iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF) rose 7.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: CAH rose 14.3% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsCAH has run far ahead of the market, rising 65.3% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (191% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termCAH turned $10,000 into $44,900 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. CAH's 10-year return of 349% puts it ahead of 78% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, CAH held up better than HSIC (Henry Schein); only MCK (McKesson) and COR fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationCAH is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.29 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.30 with the total US market, less closely than 72% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years CAH kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: 71% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 51% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.75. Market capture ↓
- Better optionsNothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CAH with less volatility over the past 5 years. Better options ↓
How much would $10,000 in CAH have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CAH over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CAH over the same span and CAH's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in CAH at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $113,257 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CAH, and VLO finished highest, at $1,019,941.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 484 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CAH; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- VLO$1M+10,099% total · +17.3% a year
- UNH$772,802+7,628% total · +16.2% a year
- COR$574,137+5,641% total · +15.0% a year
- MCK$208,304+1,983% total · +11.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- HSIC$119,782+1,098% total · +8.9% a year
- CAH$113,257+1,033% total · +8.7% a year
- CVS$97,705+877% total · +8.2% a year
- MDT$61,200+512% total · +6.4% a year
- BAX$31,168+212% total · +4.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 123 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CAH; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- AVGO$79,117+691% total · +51.2% a year
- MPC$71,516+615% total · +48.2% a year
- VLO$64,131+541% total · +45.0% a year
- TRGP$61,030+510% total · +43.6% a year
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- MCK$43,941+339% total · +34.5% a year
- COR$26,420+164% total · +21.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- BDX$10,410+4.1% total · +0.8% a year
CAH at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- CAH's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 66.1%, from June 2001 to September 2009. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- CAH is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, CAH's best was 2000, when it returned 108%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 39.6%. It lost money in 12 of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $60B
- Industry
- Medical - Distribution
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +65.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +191%+42.8% a year
- Past 5 years
- +479%+42.1% a year
- Past 10 years
- +349%+16.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +108%2000
- Worst calendar year
- −39.6%2008
- Losing years
- 12 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 24.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.55return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −66.1%Jun 2001 to Sep 2009
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
CAH against the whole market
Where CAH ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does CAH rank among all stocks?
This section ranks CAH on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how CAH stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), CAH ranks in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | CAH | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +65.3% | 367 of 3,287 | top 11% |
| 3-year return | +191% | 433 of 3,017 | top 14% |
| 5-year return | +479% | 69 of 2,893 | top 2% |
| 10-year return | +349% | 484 of 2,202 | top 22% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 24.7% | 303 of 2,893 | top 10% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.55 | 1 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −46.1% | 324 of 2,187 | top 15% |
What has beaten CAH on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). CAH sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than CAH with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- None of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CAH over the past 5 years with less volatility: nothing sits in the green region.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to CAH. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than CAH?
Investments that beat CAH over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CAH with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat CAH over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks CAH's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than CAH's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× CAH's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than CAH's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with CAH?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.29 | 0.09% | |||
| The whole marketbest 6 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 11 of 3,570 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.18 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.30 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.14 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.19 | — | |
| On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.33 | — | ||
| On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.34 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for CAH
- Annual return
- CAH returned 42.1% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $57,900. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- CAH's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.7%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CAH's return lands within 24.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- CAH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.55, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CAH earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- CAH's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 46.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 46.1% fall takes a 85.4% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, CAH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.29 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CAH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CAH holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
CAH against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against CAH, compared period by period and year by year.
How do CAH's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at CAH, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the eight popular alternatives earned more than CAH over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Five of the eight popular alternatives earned less than CAH over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, CAH returned 42.1% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (24.7% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than CAH with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| CAH This pageCardinal Health, Inc. | +42.1% | 24.7% |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | +38.7% | 25.0% |
| COR Cencora, Inc. | +24.2% | 22.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| CVS CVS Health Corp. | +5.3% | 30.4% |
| BDX Becton, Dickinson and Company | +2.3% | 24.1% |
| HSIC Henry Schein, Inc. | +1.5% | 25.4% |
| UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | +1.1% | 32.1% |
| MDT Medtronic Plc | −1.8% | 22.5% |
| BAX Baxter International Inc. | −19.8% | 34.9% |
Has CAH consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares CAH with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than CAH helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the eight popular alternatives outperformed CAH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was MCK.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than CAH over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. (this page) | — | +14.3% | +14.3% | +22.5% | +26.1% | +65.3% | +191% | +479% | +349% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | — | $60B | — |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 2/5 short1/3 long | +16.2% | +24.0% | +20.2% | +25.5% | +31.3% | +131% | +413% | +586% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | — | $120B | — |
| COR Medical - DistributionCencora, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +8.5% | +13.1% | +6.7% | +1.9% | +5.7% | +86.5% | +195% | +406% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | — | $66B | — |
| BDX Medical - Instruments & SuppliesBecton, Dickinson and Company | 3/5 short0/3 long | +7.2% | +26.2% | +23.7% | +28.9% | +32.3% | +1.6% | +12.2% | +71.4% | 24.1% | 0.22 | −39.9% | — | $53B | — |
| UNH Medical - Healthcare PlansUnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 2/5 short0/3 long | +11.0% | +0.1% | +31.2% | +27.1% | +18.1% | −15.3% | +5.5% | +241% | 32.1% | 0.20 | −61.4% | — | $376B | — |
| CVS Medical - Healthcare PlansCVS Health Corp. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +8.2% | −11.4% | +25.6% | +21.0% | +18.5% | +52.5% | +29.2% | +47.0% | 30.4% | 0.32 | −56.8% | — | $121B | — |
| BAX Medical - Instruments & SuppliesBaxter International Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +6.9% | +11.1% | +30.2% | +25.9% | +6.2% | −20.7% | −66.7% | −40.7% | 34.9% | -0.45 | −81.2% | — | $13B | — |
| MDT Medical - DevicesMedtronic Plc | 0/5 short0/3 long | +4.0% | +14.5% | +13.3% | +1.0% | +1.9% | +43.6% | −8.8% | +46.7% | 22.5% | 0.03 | −45.1% | — | $121B | — |
| HSIC Medical - DistributionHenry Schein, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.6% | −1.8% | +7.0% | +10.2% | +32.5% | +24.0% | +7.9% | +41.3% | 25.4% | 0.19 | −41.4% | — | $9.4B | — |
How did CAH do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where CAH ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with CAH and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- CAH finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, UNH came out ahead of CAH most often, in 19 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CAH finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in eight. In 2025, it ranked 2 of 9.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of CAH; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places CAH among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of CAH | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAH This pageCardinal Health, Inc. | — | +76.3% | +19.0% | +34.1% | +54.1% | −0.4% | +10.1% | +18.0% | −24.5% | −12.7% | −17.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +66.0% | +3.8% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −4.4% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −5.8% | +18.7% | −4.7% | +3.5% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | −36.8% | +51.7% | +29.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 29 | 2 of 9 | 2 of 9 | 1 of 9 | 1 of 9 | 8 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 7 of 9 | 8 of 9 | 9 of 9 | 6 of 9 | 5 of 9 | 7 of 9 | 2 of 9 | 9 of 9 | 5 of 9 | 2 of 9 | 9 of 9 | 6 of 9 | 9 of 9 | 7 of 9 | 5 of 9 | 9 of 9 | 9 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 6 of 8 | 4 of 8 | 5 of 8 | 2 of 8 | 4 of 8 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 16 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 16 of 29 | +44.5% | +23.7% | +24.1% | +51.8% | +44.2% | +27.1% | +26.7% | −28.4% | +12.0% | −28.3% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +67.7% | +25.6% | +11.8% | +13.8% | +62.9% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −1.2% | +64.9% | −1.4% | +19.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | −71.3% | +46.9% | +96.3% |
| COR Cencora, Inc. | 18 of 29 | +51.5% | +10.4% | +25.3% | +26.3% | +38.0% | +17.0% | +18.2% | −16.6% | +20.6% | −23.3% | +16.9% | +29.9% | +65.3% | +17.9% | +10.3% | +32.4% | +48.0% | −19.8% | +3.3% | +8.9% | +41.4% | +2.5% | +5.6% | −14.5% | +25.8% | +233% | −53.3% | +11.7% | +20.8% |
| BDX Becton, Dickinson and Company | 14 of 24 | −12.5% | −5.3% | −2.7% | +5.1% | +1.9% | −6.8% | +22.2% | +6.6% | +31.2% | +9.2% | +12.6% | +28.3% | +44.3% | +7.3% | −9.7% | +9.4% | +17.6% | −16.9% | +20.7% | +18.3% | +7.2% | +39.8% | +35.6% | −6.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 19 of 29 | −33.1% | −2.4% | +0.8% | +6.9% | +45.2% | +21.3% | +20.0% | +14.5% | +39.8% | +38.4% | +18.3% | +36.5% | +41.0% | +8.6% | +42.2% | +19.9% | +14.8% | −54.3% | +8.3% | −13.5% | +41.2% | +51.4% | +39.4% | +18.1% | +15.3% | +131% | +23.5% | −13.4% | +10.3% |
| CVS CVS Health Corp. | 16 of 29 | +84.3% | −40.8% | −12.6% | −7.6% | +54.9% | −5.1% | +17.3% | −7.0% | −5.8% | −17.8% | +2.9% | +36.5% | +50.4% | +20.3% | +19.0% | +9.1% | +13.2% | −27.2% | +29.4% | +17.7% | +17.8% | +25.7% | +45.7% | −14.9% | −50.4% | +51.1% | −27.1% | +72.6% | +55.5% |
| BAX Baxter International Inc. | 14 of 29 | −33.3% | −22.4% | −21.9% | −39.6% | +8.5% | −3.0% | +28.4% | +2.9% | +47.3% | +17.6% | −2.1% | +8.4% | +7.3% | +38.5% | +0.1% | −11.6% | +11.7% | −6.3% | +26.8% | +24.8% | +10.7% | +15.2% | +11.2% | −46.8% | +22.8% | +56.1% | −0.5% | +30.3% | +26.0% |
| MDT Medtronic Plc | 13 of 29 | +24.0% | +0.3% | +9.6% | −22.6% | −9.8% | +5.7% | +27.3% | +15.2% | +15.3% | −5.4% | +8.6% | +28.1% | +42.8% | +10.6% | +5.8% | −13.8% | +42.6% | −36.3% | −5.2% | −6.3% | +16.8% | +2.7% | +7.3% | −10.3% | −14.8% | +66.4% | −1.5% | +42.1% | +55.3% |
| HSIC Henry Schein, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +9.2% | −8.6% | −5.2% | +3.0% | +16.0% | +0.2% | +8.3% | +12.3% | −7.9% | −4.1% | +16.2% | +19.1% | +42.1% | +24.8% | +5.0% | +16.7% | +43.4% | −40.2% | +25.4% | +12.3% | +25.4% | +3.0% | +50.2% | +21.5% | +6.9% | +160% | −70.2% | +27.8% | +1.8% |
Risk and diversification
How CAH has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were CAH's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents CAH's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of CAH's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CAH fell 53.7% from February 1999 to March 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 8.7%.
- The slowest recovery came after CAH fell 66.1% from June 2001 to September 2009; it did not regain that peak until December 2013, four years later.
Green means CAH fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | CAH fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −66.1% | −5.4% | Jun 2001 | Sep 2009 | 8.3 years | Dec 2013 | 4.3 years |
| No named crash | −53.7% | +8.7% | Feb 1999 | Mar 2000 | 13 months | Aug 2000 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −52.6% | — | Jul 1987 | Dec 1987 | 5 months | Mar 1989 | 15 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −48.9% | +20.8% | Dec 2015 | Dec 2018 | 3 years | Oct 2022 | 3.8 years |
| No named crash | −40.3% | — | Oct 1991 | Dec 1991 | 2 months | Oct 1993 | 22 months |
How did CAH do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far CAH, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, COR held up best, falling less than CAH in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- CAH fell less than the S&P 500 in four of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when CAH fell 36.1% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than CAH.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAH This pageCardinal Health, Inc. | — | −3.5% | −21.0% | −32.1% | −25.5% | −4.6% | −15.9% | −17.5% | −1.8% | −57.9% | −36.1% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 4 of 10 | −0.9% | −10.5% | −32.1% | −20.7% | −6.5% | −30.8% | −14.2% | −3.5% | −57.7% | −39.4% |
| COR Cencora, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −2.3% | −17.8% | −23.8% | −24.2% | −7.1% | −21.4% | −14.5% | −2.8% | −41.9% | −29.7% |
| BDX Becton, Dickinson and Company | 6 of 9 | −2.0% | −19.7% | −21.8% | −20.4% | −10.8% | −15.1% | −18.3% | −1.6% | −34.1% | — |
| UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 6 of 10 | −1.8% | −16.9% | −35.9% | −18.6% | −6.7% | −12.4% | −20.7% | −0.8% | −72.4% | −19.8% |
| CVS CVS Health Corp. | 6 of 10 | −4.4% | −19.9% | −27.3% | −22.1% | −9.2% | −16.9% | −14.2% | −1.1% | −45.3% | −62.4% |
| BAX Baxter International Inc. | 3 of 10 | −3.6% | −39.1% | −23.0% | −20.9% | −8.7% | −23.0% | −18.6% | −1.9% | −31.6% | −55.7% |
| MDT Medtronic Plc | 3 of 10 | −2.1% | −27.9% | −36.0% | −13.8% | −7.2% | −17.6% | −18.0% | −1.5% | −56.5% | −44.2% |
| HSIC Henry Schein, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −1.0% | −28.5% | −41.4% | −17.7% | −4.7% | −12.8% | −18.3% | −3.0% | −47.8% | −25.6% |
How closely does CAH move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares CAH with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, CAH captured 71% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 51% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.75. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only MCK had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CAH's 1.40, out of eight popular alternatives with the same record.
- MCK took just 27% of the S&P 500's losses, against 51% for CAH, while still keeping 72% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than CAH's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAH This pageCardinal Health, Inc. | 71% | 51% | 1.40 | 0.75 |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 72% | 27% | 2.71 | 0.56 |
| COR Cencora, Inc. | 80% | 58% | 1.39 | 0.56 |
| UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 81% | 82% | 0.98 | 0.70 |
| BDX Becton, Dickinson and Company | 53% | 77% | 0.69 | 0.48 |
| CVS CVS Health Corp. | 59% | 99% | 0.60 | 0.70 |
| MDT Medtronic Plc | 62% | 105% | 0.59 | 0.68 |
| HSIC Henry Schein, Inc. | 72% | 124% | 0.59 | 0.85 |
| BAX Baxter International Inc. | 45% | 125% | 0.36 | 0.64 |
What diversifies CAH?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with CAH's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing CAH with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in CAH into SMH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 13% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+37.8% for CAH alone, +39.4% for the mix).
- FIX made money in nine of the 12 calendar years in which CAH lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of CAH over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.41 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which CAH lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% CAH and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2021 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +479% | 1.55 | −0.4% | −24.5% | −12.7% | −17.5% | −4.4% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −5.8% | −4.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | −36.8% | 26.4% | +37.8% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.33 | +119% | 1.48 | +17.8% | −5.2% | +10.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.8% | +33.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.39 | +225% | 1.34 | +18.0% | −19.8% | +22.8% | +1.1% | +2.0% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 22.2% | +36.1% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.41 | +101% | 1.04 | +23.1% | −8.7% | +1.1% | +29.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.4% | +33.6% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.34 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +19.6% | −3.0% | +13.5% | +15.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.2% | +32.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.12 | +323% | 0.97 | +42.1% | −9.1% | +38.5% | +35.6% | +60.5% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −6.7% | −19.3% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 23.0% | +39.4% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.39 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +19.6% | −9.5% | +16.7% | +6.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.1% | +33.2% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.04 | +126% | 0.96 | −4.2% | −1.9% | +12.8% | +8.0% | +24.0% | +4.9% | +30.4% | +22.6% | — | — | — | — | 21.5% | +34.6% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.27 | +136% | 0.93 | +22.7% | −0.9% | +27.8% | +7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.6% | +35.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2021 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +479% | 1.55 | −0.4% | −24.5% | −12.7% | −17.5% | −4.4% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −5.8% | −4.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | −36.8% | 26.4% | +37.8% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.07 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +37.9% | −16.3% | −11.6% | +7.4% | +105% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −26.0% | −6.4% | −65.1% | −25.6% | +350% | 24.9% | +54.1% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.19 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +89.0% | +0.8% | +32.1% | +18.3% | +17.8% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +38.9% | +40.0% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −58.7% | 24.4% | +49.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.48 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.2% | −28.4% | +12.0% | −28.3% | +62.9% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −1.2% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | −71.3% | 23.9% | +37.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.18 | +690% | 1.41 | +61.0% | −8.2% | +34.8% | +0.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.2% | +41.3% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.44 | +594% | 1.36 | +11.7% | −37.5% | +48.4% | −11.5% | +51.3% | −67.4% | +26.4% | +5.5% | −14.1% | −33.1% | +9.8% | +133% | 24.9% | +41.0% |
Common questions
What was CAH's worst drawdown?
CAH's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 66.1%, from June 2001 to September 2009. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were CAH's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, CAH's best year was 2000, when it returned 108%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -39.6%.
Is there a better investment than CAH?
Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CAH with less volatility over the past 5 years.
Is CAH more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. CAH's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.7%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CAH's return lands within 24.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is CAH's Sharpe ratio?
CAH's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.55, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CAH earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is CAH with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, CAH's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.29 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CAH instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CAH holding.
What are the best alternatives to CAH?
None of the eight popular alternatives we compared outperformed CAH in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about CAH's strength than about its alternatives.
Did CAH outperform the S&P 500?
CAH finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +76.3%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did CAH do in stock market crashes?
CAH fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when CAH fell 36.1% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies CAH?
These had a low correlation with CAH over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.33), DXJ (correlation 0.39) and EMLP (correlation 0.41); among large stocks, CLS (correlation 0.07), FIX (correlation 0.19) and MCK (correlation 0.48). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than CAH's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of CAH's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.