Relative Intelligence · E-Commerce

How Amazon.com (AMZN) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on AMZN alone. It places AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where AMZN stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: AMZN's full trading record, from May 1997 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowIts e-commerce peers split over the past 6 months: SHOP (Shopify) rose 28.4%, while BABA (Alibaba Group Holding) fell 21.7%. AMZN has trailed the market, rising 5.8% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?AMZN rose 5.1% over the past 3 months, 4.1 points ahead of the consumer discretionary sector ETF XLY (State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF), which rose 1.0%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its e-commerce peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: SHOP (Shopify) rose 39.4%, while BABA (Alibaba Group Holding) fell 9.7%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, AMZN rose 21.3% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (110% against 89.3%). Even so, AMZN led its e-commerce peers in 2023, then fell behind TGT (Target) and EBAY in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termAMZN turned $10,000 into $64,800 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, over 5 years AMZN trailed the index: 53.8% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAMZN fell harder than the S&P 500 in six of seven sell-offs. The Covid crash was the exception: AMZN fell 22.7%, less than the S&P 500's 33.7%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, AMZN has a correlation of 0.67 over 5 years, more closely than 97% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Over 10 years, AMZN's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.31: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.3 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.4 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- MSFT (Microsoft), COST (Costco Wholesale) and GOOG (Alphabet) earned more than AMZN with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 9.0% a year at 36.6%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- IYW (iShares U.S. Technology ETF, cloud computing theme) and CIBR (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF, cybersecurity) earned more than AMZN with less volatility over the past 5 years. IYW returned 19.0% a year at 26.6% volatility, against 9.0% a year at 36.6%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 9.0% at 36.6% for AMZN.
How much would $10,000 in AMZN have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in AMZN over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of AMZN over the same span and AMZN's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in AMZN at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $11,484,924 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Over the past 29 years, only two of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded that long, leveraged funds aside, ended ahead of AMZN. Over the past 5 years, 1,528 did, and GOOG turned $10,000 into $25,811, against $15,169 for AMZN.
- Two of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of AMZN, and MNST finished highest, at $45,663,831.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 2 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AMZN. The other 6 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MNST$46M+456,538% total · +33.7% a year
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- COST$727,732+7,177% total · +15.9% a year
- BBY$604,450+5,945% total · +15.2% a year
- MSFT$508,386+4,984% total · +14.5% a year
- WMT$272,033+2,620% total · +12.1% a year
- TGT$184,797+1,748% total · +10.6% a year
- FDX$138,138+1,281% total · +9.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,528 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AMZN; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- WMT$23,813+138% total · +18.9% a year
- COST$21,378+114% total · +16.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
- EBAY$16,622+66.2% total · +10.7% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
- SHOP$10,938+9.4% total · +1.8% a year
- W$4,014−59.9% total · −16.7% a year
AMZN at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- AMZN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1997 was 94.4%, from December 1999 to September 2001. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 28 full calendar years, AMZN's best was 1998, when it returned 968%, and its worst was 2000, when it lost 79.6%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- AMZN is 7.5% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $2.8T
- Industry
- Specialty Retail
- Price history from
- May 1997
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +21.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +110%+28.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- +53.8%+9.0% a year
- Past 10 years
- +548%+20.6% a year
- Best calendar year
- +968%1998
- Worst calendar year
- −79.6%2000
- Losing years
- 8 of 28full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 36.6%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.42return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −94.4%Dec 1999 to Sep 2001
- From its all-time high
- −7.5%below the peak
AMZN against the whole market
Where AMZN ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does AMZN rank among all stocks?
This section ranks AMZN on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how AMZN stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- AMZN's 10-year return ranks in the top 12% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | AMZN | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +21.3% | 1,201 of 3,287 | top 37% |
| 3-year return | +110% | 855 of 3,017 | top 28% |
| 5-year return | +53.8% | 1,063 of 2,893 | top 37% |
| 10-year return | +548% | 265 of 2,202 | top 12% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 36.6% | 1,244 of 2,893 | top 43% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.42 | 1,181 of 2,893 | top 41% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −56.1% | 723 of 2,187 | top 33% |
What has beaten AMZN on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). AMZN sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than AMZN with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 412 stocks and 353 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than AMZN over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 21% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half AMZN's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 32% less than AMZN's 36.6%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.42 for AMZN. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than AMZN (33.4% against 36.6%).
- Among AMZN's popular alternatives, WMT, COST and GOOG are in the region. WMT earned 20.8% a year against 9.0% a year for AMZN, at 22.6% volatility, 38% less than AMZN's 36.6%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to AMZN; faint dots are 90 more of the 765 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than AMZN?
Investments that beat AMZN over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among AMZN's popular alternatives, MSFT, COST and GOOG earned more than AMZN with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 9.0% a year at 36.6%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, IYW (cloud computing theme) and CIBR (cybersecurity) earned more than AMZN with less volatility over the past 5 years. IYW returned 19.0% a year at 26.6% volatility, against 9.0% a year at 36.6%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 9.0% at 36.6% for AMZN.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat AMZN over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks AMZN's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than AMZN follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than AMZN's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× AMZN's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than AMZN's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with AMZN?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +9.0% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | +548% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.67 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against AMZN. 8 of 21 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.62 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.68 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +11.7% | 32.9% | 0.50 | −53.6% | +374% | 0.49 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.64 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in E-Commerce and the categories next to it (Specialty Retail, Software, Internet Services, Freight & Logistics), plus AMZN's specific themes. 28 of 149 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
IYWiShares U.S. Technology ETF · Technology Equity · Cloud Computing theme | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.0% | 26.6% | 0.79 | −39.4% | +805% | 0.71 | 0.37% | |
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.46 | 0.58% | |
SNXTD Synnex Corp · Technology Distribution · Cloud Computing theme | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +20.3% | 30.4% | 0.76 | −55.8% | +430% | 0.44 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.12 | — | ||
MATXMatson, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +24.9% | 39.4% | 0.76 | −53.6% | +594% | 0.37 | — | |
FOXFox Corporation · Media · Video Streaming theme | Similar return, lower volatility | +9.6% | 28.0% | 0.47 | −60.2% | +162% | 0.33 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,166 of 3,463 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.02 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.20 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | -0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.60 | 0.35% | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.37 | 0.05% | ||
What these numbers mean for AMZN
- Annual return
- AMZN returned 9.0% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $15,400. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- AMZN's volatility over the past 5 years was 36.6%, 2.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AMZN's return lands within 36.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- AMZN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.42, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AMZN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- AMZN's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 56.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 56.1% fall takes a 128% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, AMZN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.67 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AMZN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AMZN holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 765 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than AMZN with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with AMZN | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.02 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.20 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.02 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.51 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.29 | — | |
| 6 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.28 | 0.48% |
| 7 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | -0.21 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.39 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.02 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | -0.16 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.22 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.24 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.69 | 0.09% | |
| 14 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.09 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.32 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.38 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.11 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | -0.09 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.32 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.31 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.38 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.42 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.34 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +426% | 0.27 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | -0.05 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | -0.13 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.17 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +13.3% | 30.0% | 0.57 | −39.2% | +711% | 0.24 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.26 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +13.9% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | +923% | 0.30 | — | |
| 31 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.38 | — |
| 32 | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +13.3% | 23.8% | 0.65 | −49.7% | — | 0.10 | — |
| 33 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.27 | 0.36% |
| 34 | RGLDRoyal Gold, Inc. · Gold Mining | Whole market | +20.6% | 32.4% | 0.74 | −49.5% | +282% | -0.07 | — |
| 35 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.11 | — | |
| 36 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.41 | 0.59% |
| 37 | Popular alternative | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.62 | — | |
| 38 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.19 | — |
| 39 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.40 | 0.15% |
| 40 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | -0.05 | — |
| 41 | AIQGlobal X - Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF · Artificial Intelligence | Whole market | +14.8% | 26.7% | 0.65 | −44.6% | — | 0.65 | 0.68% |
| 42 | ACAArcosa, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +23.1% | 34.0% | 0.78 | −36.8% | — | 0.46 | — |
| 43 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | -0.16 | — |
| 44 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.13 | — |
| 45 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.40 | 0.19% |
| 46 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.58 | 0.40% |
| 47 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.63 | 0.40% |
| 48 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | -0.17 | — | |
| 49 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.5% | 22.5% | 0.83 | −31.4% | — | 0.72 | 0.15% |
| 50 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Same or nearby category | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.46 | 0.58% |
| 51 | NICNicolet Bankshares, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 30.1% | 0.73 | −44.3% | +344% | 0.06 | — |
| 52 | QTECFirst Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund · Technology | Whole market | +13.0% | 30.3% | 0.56 | −45.5% | +531% | 0.66 | 0.55% |
| 53 | HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +12.6% | 25.8% | 0.59 | −38.7% | +373% | 0.48 | 0.60% |
| 54 | GRCThe Gorman-Rupp Company · Industrial - Machinery | Whole market | +15.1% | 31.3% | 0.61 | −49.3% | +281% | 0.30 | — |
| 55 | RBCAARepublic Bancorp, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.8% | 27.9% | 0.64 | −44.7% | +318% | 0.11 | — |
| 56 | CTBICommunity Trust Bancorp, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +16.0% | 26.0% | 0.70 | −43.0% | +192% | 0.08 | — |
| 57 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.14 | 0.59% |
| 58 | IGPTInvesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF · Technology | Whole market | +14.3% | 30.1% | 0.60 | −50.1% | +525% | 0.55 | 0.57% |
| 59 | NPKNational Presto Industries, Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 27.3% | 0.69 | −45.5% | +181% | 0.28 | — |
| 60 | TRSTTrustCo Bank Corp NY · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.5% | 26.8% | 0.68 | −49.5% | +126% | 0.04 | — |
| 61 | THFFFirst Financial Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 26.2% | 0.69 | −42.8% | +161% | 0.05 | — |
| 62 | FSBCFive Star Bancorp · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.1% | 31.3% | 0.58 | −40.8% | +297% | 0.09 | — |
| 63 | FBIZFirst Business Financial Services, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +23.1% | 29.4% | 0.85 | −50.2% | +307% | 0.08 | — |
| 64 | SPHBInvesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 28.1% | 0.59 | −46.8% | +388% | 0.59 | 0.25% |
| 65 | GVALCambria Global Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.4% | 18.7% | 0.82 | −46.8% | +173% | 0.13 | 0.68% |
| 66 | ACNBACNB Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +22.1% | 34.4% | 0.75 | −49.7% | +237% | 0.14 | — |
| 67 | RCBCRiver City Bank · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.6% | 27.2% | 0.64 | −45.5% | +345% | 0.00 | — |
| 68 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.17 | — | |
| 69 | FNGSMicroSectors FANG+ ETN · Technology | Whole market | +19.5% | 30.3% | 0.74 | −49.0% | — | 0.78 | 0.58% |
| 70 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.67 | 0.03% | |
| 71 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.67 | 0.03% | |
| 72 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.24 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.08 | — | |
| 74 | Popular alternative | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.45 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.10 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.04 | — | |
| 77 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.32 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.30 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | -0.15 | — | |
| 80 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | -0.12 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | 0.03 | — | |
| 82 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.16 | — | |
| 83 | Whole market | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +190% | 0.14 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | -0.28 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.34 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.47 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.05 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +24.7% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | +339% | 0.09 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | 0.07 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.37 | — | |
| 91 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.13 | 0.40% |
| 92 | CSWCSW Industrials, Inc. · Industrial Products | Whole market | +17.1% | 34.4% | 0.63 | −46.2% | +867% | 0.39 | — |
| 93 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | -0.11 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.25 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.14 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.27 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.34 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | -0.28 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | -0.12 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | 0.07 | — |
See everything that outperformed AMZN →
AMZN against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against AMZN, compared period by period and year by year.
How do AMZN's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at AMZN, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- 12 of the 21 popular alternatives earned less than AMZN over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Six of the 21 popular alternatives, led by WMT, GOOG and COST, were both more rewarding and calmer than AMZN over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, AMZN returned 9.0% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (36.6% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than AMZN with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | +20.8% | 22.6% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | +17.4% | 22.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| FDX FedEx Corporation | +12.0% | 32.8% |
| EBAY eBay Inc. | +11.7% | 32.9% |
| AMZN This pageAmazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | +3.2% | 49.5% |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | +3.1% | 66.9% |
| BBY Best Buy Co., Inc. | +0.7% | 38.1% |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | −1.3% | 44.4% |
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. | −3.9% | 66.0% |
| TGT Target Corporation | −6.5% | 36.1% |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | −8.2% | 51.3% |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | −8.6% | 28.9% |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | −13.1% | 52.0% |
| W Wayfair Inc. | −14.5% | 81.8% |
| ETSY Etsy, Inc. | −17.8% | 55.4% |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | −18.6% | 52.6% |
| CHWY Chewy, Inc. | −20.1% | 61.0% |
| SE Sea Limited | −25.9% | 64.6% |
Has AMZN consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares AMZN with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than AMZN helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Four of the 21 popular alternatives, led by EBAY, SHOP and MSFT, outperformed AMZN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- WMT, COST and GOOG earned more for the risk they took than AMZN (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- GOOG outperformed AMZN over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so AMZN has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than AMZN over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. (this page) | — | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| EBAY QualifiedeBay Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +11.9% | +6.5% | +13.8% | +40.5% | +28.3% | +213% | +74.2% | +374% | 32.9% | 0.50 | −53.6% | — | $54B | — |
| SHOP QualifiedShopify Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +25.8% | +39.4% | +28.4% | +10.4% | +5.3% | +239% | +16.6% | +3,916% | 66.9% | 0.38 | −84.8% | — | $225B | — |
| MSFT QualifiedMicrosoft Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| COST QualifiedCostco Wholesale Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | +10.7% | +6.5% | 0.0% | +16.9% | +6.9% | +87.2% | +123% | +685% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | — | $441B | — |
| NVDA SemiconductorsNVIDIA Corporation | 2/5 short3/3 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| GOOG Internet Content & InformationAlphabet Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | +752% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| WMT Discount StoresWalmart Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | +9.7% | +5.3% | −7.5% | +5.2% | +11.0% | +130% | +158% | +508% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | — | $938B | — |
| W Specialty RetailWayfair Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +8.2% | +29.4% | +40.0% | +6.6% | +36.6% | +159% | −54.2% | +213% | 81.8% | 0.21 | −93.0% | — | $16B | — |
| FDX Integrated Freight & LogisticsFedEx Corporation | 2/5 short1/3 long | +1.0% | −2.1% | −5.4% | +27.6% | +56.7% | +63.1% | +76.6% | +156% | 32.8% | 0.52 | −66.0% | — | $71B | — |
| MELI Specialty RetailMercadoLibre, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +3.2% | +2.6% | +0.5% | −4.8% | −10.6% | +60.7% | +17.2% | +1,002% | 49.5% | 0.31 | −69.1% | — | $95B | — |
| ETSY Specialty RetailEtsy, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +19.0% | +4.0% | +36.2% | +52.6% | +22.5% | +34.7% | −62.5% | +511% | 55.4% | -0.08 | −86.3% | — | $8.0B | — |
| BBY Specialty RetailBest Buy Co., Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +0.7% | +11.4% | +43.6% | +41.1% | +22.1% | +58.2% | +3.5% | +242% | 38.1% | 0.21 | −52.6% | — | $20B | — |
| TGT Discount StoresTarget Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | −2.4% | +11.2% | +20.3% | +57.4% | +75.1% | +58.0% | −28.5% | +207% | 36.1% | 0.00 | −64.4% | — | $70B | — |
| BURL Apparel - RetailBurlington Stores, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.8% | −26.5% | −25.6% | −13.2% | −3.1% | +112% | −6.2% | +240% | 44.4% | 0.19 | −68.9% | — | $16B | — |
| UPS Integrated Freight & LogisticsUnited Parcel Service, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +4.0% | −11.5% | −5.0% | +2.2% | +20.8% | −23.0% | −36.1% | +35.4% | 28.9% | -0.17 | −57.9% | — | $74B | — |
| CHWY Specialty RetailChewy, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +5.0% | −2.1% | −25.4% | −35.7% | −42.5% | +28.2% | −67.3% | — | 61.0% | -0.07 | −87.4% | — | $8.7B | — |
| PDD Specialty RetailPDD Holdings Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.9% | −5.1% | −21.7% | −29.5% | −38.0% | −20.6% | −17.9% | — | 66.0% | 0.26 | −87.4% | — | $116B | — |
| JD Specialty RetailJD.com, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.9% | −12.5% | −14.7% | −6.2% | −18.0% | +20.2% | −64.3% | +14.4% | 52.6% | -0.14 | −79.1% | — | $36B | — |
| BABA Specialty RetailAlibaba Group Holding Limited | 0/5 short0/3 long | −6.1% | −9.7% | −21.7% | −29.6% | −36.8% | +44.5% | −34.8% | +11.2% | 51.3% | 0.08 | −80.1% | — | $270B | — |
| CPNG Specialty RetailCoupang, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.1% | −12.9% | −33.4% | −38.7% | −54.8% | −18.9% | −50.3% | — | 52.0% | -0.01 | −81.5% | — | $26B | — |
| SE Specialty RetailSea Limited | 0/5 short0/3 long | −21.6% | −23.9% | −10.0% | −38.8% | −51.5% | +80.3% | −77.7% | — | 64.6% | -0.14 | −90.5% | — | $49B | — |
How did AMZN do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1998, along with where AMZN ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with AMZN and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Among its popular alternatives, SHOP came out ahead of AMZN most often, in eight of the ten years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, AMZN finished in the top quarter in 12 of 28 years and in the bottom quarter in six. In 2025, it ranked 13 of 22.
- AMZN finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 16 of its 28 full calendar years.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of AMZN; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places AMZN among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of AMZN | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN This pageAmazon.com, Inc. | — | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% | −16.0% | +178% | +74.6% | −30.5% | −79.6% | +42.2% | +968% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 12 of 28 | 13 of 22 | 6 of 22 | 5 of 22 | 17 of 22 | 13 of 21 | 10 of 21 | 17 of 20 | 4 of 19 | 9 of 18 | 11 of 18 | 2 of 16 | 13 of 13 | 2 of 12 | 2 of 12 | 7 of 12 | 1 of 12 | 2 of 12 | 7 of 12 | 1 of 11 | 10 of 11 | 4 of 11 | 10 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 10 of 10 | 10 of 10 | 5 of 8 | 1 of 7 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 28 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% |
| EBAY eBay Inc. | 11 of 27 | +42.7% | +44.8% | +7.7% | −36.5% | +33.8% | +41.2% | +30.6% | −25.6% | +27.1% | +8.1% | +16.3% | +2.3% | +7.6% | +68.0% | +9.0% | +18.3% | +68.2% | −57.9% | +10.4% | −30.4% | −25.7% | +80.1% | +90.3% | +1.5% | +103% | −47.3% | +55.8% | — |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 8 of 10 | +51.4% | +36.5% | +124% | −74.8% | +21.7% | +185% | +187% | +37.1% | +135% | +66.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 11 of 28 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% | +5.8% | −4.5% | −6.5% | +60.5% | −44.4% | +20.8% | +15.8% | −1.0% | +9.2% | +6.2% | −22.0% | +52.8% | −62.9% | +68.4% | +115% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 10 of 28 | −5.4% | +39.6% | +49.0% | −19.1% | +51.8% | +32.7% | +45.7% | +10.6% | +22.4% | +0.3% | +18.9% | +20.5% | +21.9% | +28.4% | +16.7% | +23.7% | +14.3% | −24.0% | +33.2% | +7.9% | +3.2% | +31.1% | +32.5% | −36.8% | +11.1% | −12.5% | +26.4% | +61.8% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 14 of 26 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% | −11.0% | −10.0% | −17.6% | +131% | −76.3% | +37.9% | +102% | +55.2% | +1.6% | +102% | −82.8% | +308% | +39.6% | — | — |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 8 of 21 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% | +29.1% | −1.0% | +35.6% | +1.7% | +44.5% | −6.0% | +58.5% | +9.5% | +8.8% | −4.2% | +101% | −55.5% | +50.2% | +11.1% | +115% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 13 of 28 | +24.5% | +74.0% | +12.9% | −0.5% | +1.9% | +23.4% | +30.1% | −3.4% | +46.6% | +16.1% | −26.6% | +11.8% | +18.2% | +17.1% | +13.8% | +3.1% | −2.5% | +20.0% | +4.9% | +0.2% | −10.2% | +0.6% | +5.6% | −11.8% | +8.9% | −22.7% | +70.5% | +107% |
| W Wayfair Inc. | 5 of 11 | +127% | −28.2% | +87.6% | −82.7% | −15.9% | +150% | +0.3% | +12.2% | +129% | −26.4% | +140% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FDX FedEx Corporation | 8 of 28 | +5.1% | +13.5% | +49.1% | −31.6% | +0.7% | +74.3% | −4.8% | −34.7% | +35.2% | +26.1% | −13.7% | +21.4% | +57.6% | +10.5% | −9.7% | +12.1% | +31.1% | −27.7% | −17.6% | +5.4% | +5.3% | +46.4% | +24.9% | +4.8% | +61.0% | −2.4% | −8.2% | +46.0% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 10 of 18 | +18.4% | +8.2% | +85.7% | −37.2% | −19.5% | +193% | +95.3% | −6.9% | +102% | +37.1% | −10.1% | +19.2% | +38.0% | −0.7% | +19.9% | +28.5% | +216% | −77.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ETSY Etsy, Inc. | 6 of 10 | +4.8% | −34.7% | −32.3% | −45.3% | +23.1% | +302% | −6.9% | +133% | +73.6% | +42.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BBY Best Buy Co., Inc. | 13 of 28 | −17.8% | +14.4% | +2.5% | −17.5% | +4.4% | +16.7% | +70.5% | −20.6% | +64.5% | +46.5% | −18.8% | +0.1% | +244% | −47.3% | −30.3% | −11.8% | +43.2% | −45.9% | +7.8% | +13.9% | +10.8% | +14.6% | +117% | −51.3% | +152% | −41.2% | +63.7% | +233% |
| TGT Target Corporation | 9 of 28 | −24.5% | −2.3% | −1.4% | −34.2% | +32.9% | +40.5% | +100% | +4.7% | −5.8% | +2.7% | −1.6% | +23.8% | +9.5% | +18.2% | −13.0% | +26.3% | +42.4% | −30.0% | −11.6% | +4.7% | +6.6% | +36.1% | +29.0% | −26.5% | +28.0% | −11.5% | +36.2% | +62.2% |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 7 of 12 | +1.3% | +46.6% | −4.1% | −30.4% | +11.5% | +14.7% | +40.2% | +32.2% | +45.2% | +97.5% | −9.2% | +47.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 11 of 26 | −15.9% | −15.9% | −6.0% | −16.2% | +30.0% | +48.6% | +24.2% | −15.5% | +7.1% | +22.7% | −10.9% | +8.7% | +46.5% | +3.9% | +3.8% | +30.3% | +7.8% | −19.8% | −3.5% | +1.8% | −10.5% | +16.4% | +19.9% | +17.3% | −6.0% | −13.8% | — | — |
| CHWY Chewy, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −1.3% | +41.7% | −36.3% | −37.1% | −34.4% | +210% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. | 4 of 7 | +16.9% | −33.7% | +79.4% | +39.9% | −67.2% | +370% | +68.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 4 of 11 | −14.9% | +23.5% | −47.8% | −17.9% | −20.3% | +149% | +68.3% | −49.5% | +62.9% | −21.2% | +39.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 4 of 11 | +75.8% | +11.8% | −10.8% | −25.9% | −49.0% | +9.7% | +54.7% | −20.5% | +96.4% | +8.1% | −21.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | 1 of 4 | +7.3% | +35.8% | +10.1% | −49.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SE Sea Limited | 5 of 8 | +20.2% | +162% | −22.2% | −76.7% | +12.4% | +395% | +255% | −15.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How AMZN has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were AMZN's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents AMZN's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1997, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of AMZN's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: AMZN fell 59.2% from April to August 1999, while the S&P 500 slipped only 3.9%.
- The slowest recovery came after AMZN fell 94.4% from December 1999 to September 2001; it did not regain that peak until October 2009, eight years later.
Green means AMZN fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | AMZN fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −94.4% | −24.7% | Dec 1999 | Sep 2001 | 21 months | Oct 2009 | 8.1 years |
| No named crash | −59.2% | −3.9% | Apr 1999 | Aug 1999 | 4 months | Dec 1999 | 4 months |
| 2022 bear market | −56.1% | −10.6% | Jul 2021 | Dec 2022 | 17 months | Apr 2024 | 16 months |
| No named crash | −51.5% | −2.2% | Jan 1999 | Feb 1999 | 1 month | Apr 1999 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −47.6% | −10.3% | Jul 1998 | Sep 1998 | 2 months | Nov 1998 | 2 months |
How did AMZN do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far AMZN, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- AMZN fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when AMZN fell 91.8% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, WMT held up best, falling less than AMZN in all ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than AMZN.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN This pageAmazon.com, Inc. | — | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| EBAY eBay Inc. | 3 of 10 | −6.6% | −44.2% | −31.6% | −23.2% | −7.4% | −25.6% | −21.8% | −3.5% | −74.7% | −77.1% |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 2 of 6 | −5.1% | −79.0% | −40.7% | −27.6% | −5.4% | −49.2% | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 7 of 10 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 9 of 10 | −3.1% | −31.4% | −13.7% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −15.2% | −13.5% | −1.2% | −48.0% | −50.1% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 3 of 10 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 4 of 9 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 10 of 10 | −0.8% | −25.7% | −13.1% | −18.3% | −4.9% | −22.3% | −10.5% | −1.5% | −26.2% | −31.8% |
| W Wayfair Inc. | 1 of 6 | −15.8% | −83.8% | −71.4% | −45.5% | −3.3% | −40.5% | — | — | — | — |
| FDX FedEx Corporation | 2 of 10 | −5.3% | −45.3% | −44.9% | −38.1% | −8.0% | −27.0% | −29.7% | −3.3% | −67.8% | −30.0% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −7.2% | −51.6% | −39.1% | −30.3% | −8.8% | −31.9% | −39.5% | 0.0% | −89.5% | — |
| ETSY Etsy, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −8.4% | −65.7% | −49.3% | −25.1% | −5.6% | −63.3% | — | — | — | — |
| BBY Best Buy Co., Inc. | 3 of 10 | −6.6% | −40.7% | −44.3% | −39.7% | −4.5% | −33.1% | −25.2% | −1.1% | −66.9% | −74.1% |
| TGT Target Corporation | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −43.9% | −21.7% | −30.3% | −3.0% | −15.8% | −10.4% | −1.3% | −60.6% | −42.6% |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −4.8% | −61.5% | −51.4% | −15.6% | −3.7% | −26.8% | — | — | — | — |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 9 of 10 | −1.5% | −29.8% | −18.5% | −23.7% | −8.7% | −16.4% | −16.4% | −1.6% | −47.9% | −26.5% |
| CHWY Chewy, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −3.7% | −57.1% | −26.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PDD PDD Holdings Inc. | 1 of 4 | −7.9% | −61.4% | −15.7% | −38.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −14.6% | −45.1% | −21.0% | −27.3% | −8.2% | −29.9% | — | — | — | — |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 3 of 6 | −4.7% | −45.1% | −20.6% | −20.7% | −7.3% | −29.1% | — | — | — | — |
| CPNG Coupang, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −7.3% | −64.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SE Sea Limited | 1 of 5 | −8.0% | −73.3% | −27.7% | −26.4% | −8.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does AMZN move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares AMZN with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- MSFT took just 91% of the S&P 500's losses, against 139% for AMZN, while still keeping 127% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, AMZN captured 134% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 139% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.31. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Seven of the 17 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than AMZN's 0.96, led by WMT, COST and NVDA.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than AMZN's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN This pageAmazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 74% | 36% | 2.08 | 0.53 |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 93% | 50% | 1.85 | 0.77 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 135% | 111% | 1.21 | 1.44 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 132% | 110% | 1.20 | 1.12 |
| SHOP Shopify Inc. | 233% | 203% | 1.15 | 2.09 |
| TGT Target Corporation | 83% | 87% | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| ETSY Etsy, Inc. | 133% | 148% | 0.90 | 1.76 |
| EBAY eBay Inc. | 113% | 133% | 0.85 | 1.23 |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 103% | 121% | 0.85 | 1.22 |
| BBY Best Buy Co., Inc. | 127% | 164% | 0.77 | 1.40 |
| FDX FedEx Corporation | 116% | 166% | 0.70 | 1.29 |
| W Wayfair Inc. | 230% | 356% | 0.65 | 3.06 |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 85% | 149% | 0.57 | 1.08 |
| JD JD.com, Inc. | 51% | 92% | 0.56 | 0.57 |
| BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 74% | 140% | 0.53 | 0.65 |
What diversifies AMZN?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with AMZN's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing AMZN with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in AMZN into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+8.7% for AMZN alone, +11.3% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of AMZN over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.28 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in five of the eight calendar years in which AMZN lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which AMZN lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% AMZN and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2006 | 2004 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +53.8% | 0.42 | −49.6% | −22.2% | −3.9% | −44.7% | −16.5% | −16.0% | −30.5% | −79.6% | 34.0% | +8.7% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.13 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27.5% | +11.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.28 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +8.1% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 28.0% | +13.1% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.27 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.1% | +10.9% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.10 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | +12.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27.6% | +10.4% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.39 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | +3.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.1% | +10.5% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.04 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +22.6% | — | — | — | 27.5% | +11.7% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.45 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29.2% | +12.0% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.05 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −8.7% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +18.0% | +33.8% | −18.2% | +24.4% | 27.9% | +12.9% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 2006 | 2004 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +53.8% | 0.42 | −49.6% | −22.2% | −3.9% | −44.7% | −16.5% | −16.0% | −30.5% | −79.6% | 34.0% | +8.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.02 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | +23.0% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −5.8% | −4.7% | −2.5% | +108% | 27.8% | +15.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.47 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | +12.9% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −26.0% | −6.4% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 34.2% | +26.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.39 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | −10.4% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +38.9% | +40.0% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 31.7% | +23.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.02 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +29.3% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −1.2% | −1.4% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 27.7% | +15.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.11 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | +17.5% |
Common questions
What was AMZN's worst drawdown?
AMZN's deepest decline since it began trading in 1997 was 94.4%, from December 1999 to September 2001. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were AMZN's best and worst years?
Over 28 full calendar years, AMZN's best year was 1998, when it returned 968%. Its worst was 2000, with a return of -79.6%.
Is there a better investment than AMZN?
Among AMZN's popular alternatives, MSFT, COST and GOOG earned more than AMZN with less volatility over the past 5 years. MSFT returned 12.5% a year at 28.2% volatility, against 9.0% a year at 36.6%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, IYW (cloud computing theme) and CIBR (cybersecurity) earned more than AMZN with less volatility over the past 5 years. IYW returned 19.0% a year at 26.6% volatility, against 9.0% a year at 36.6%.
Is AMZN more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. AMZN's volatility over the past 5 years was 36.6%, 2.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AMZN's return lands within 36.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is AMZN's Sharpe ratio?
AMZN's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.42, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AMZN earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is AMZN with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, AMZN's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.67 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AMZN instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AMZN holding.
What are the best alternatives to AMZN?
Of the 21 popular alternatives we compared, four outperformed AMZN in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: EBAY, SHOP and MSFT.
Did AMZN outperform the S&P 500?
AMZN finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 16 of 28 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +5.2%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did AMZN do in stock market crashes?
AMZN fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when AMZN fell 91.8% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies AMZN?
These had a low correlation with AMZN over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.13), DXJ (correlation 0.28) and EMLP (correlation 0.27); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.02), CLS (correlation 0.47) and FIX (correlation 0.39). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than AMZN's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of AMZN's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.