Relative Intelligence · Tobacco

How Philip Morris International (PM) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on PM alone. It places PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) against 9 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where PM stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: PM's full trading record, from March 2008 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowPM has run far ahead of the market, rising 29.0% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. After a 20.6% loss from June 2025 to October 2025, PM has bounced 22.5% off the low. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?PM rose 4.6% over the past 3 months, in line with the tobacco ETF XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF), which rose 4.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: PM rose 7.5% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, PM rose 30.9% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (144% against 89.3%). The last two calendar years both went the same way: PM rose 38.0% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termPM turned $10,000 into $34,200 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: PM rose 159% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashPM fell less than the S&P 500 in four of five sell-offs, but the late-2018 sell-off broke the pattern: it fell 26.1%, more than the S&P 500's 19.3%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, PM has a correlation of 0.23 over 5 years, less closely than 82% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. Over 10 years PM kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: 70% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 60% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.58. Market capture ↓
- Better optionsFew investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund). Better options ↓
How much would $10,000 in PM have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in PM over the past 18 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of PM over the same span and PM's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: PM began trading on March 17, 2008, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust. It covers the most recent 18 years of PM's record, starting at the end of September 2008.
- $10,000 invested in PM at the end of September 2008 would have grown to $90,824 by September 2026, about the same as the $91,104 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of PM, and NVDA finished highest, at $9,364,421.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2008 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 482 of the 1,883 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$9M+93,544% total · +46.2% a year
- AAPL$979,453+9,695% total · +29.0% a year
- LLY$431,739+4,217% total · +23.3% a year
- MO$104,562+946% total · +13.9% a year
- WM$103,353+934% total · +13.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$91,104+811% total · +13.1% a year
- PM$90,824+808% total · +13.0% a year
- STZ$62,845+528% total · +10.8% a year
- KO$56,706+467% total · +10.1% a year
- DEO$20,363+104% total · +4.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 506 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of PM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- NHC$35,792+258% total · +29.0% a year
- MPLX$30,642+206% total · +25.1% a year
- ABBV$29,134+191% total · +23.8% a year
- PM$25,119+151% total · +20.2% a year
- MO$21,729+117% total · +16.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- KO$18,994+89.9% total · +13.7% a year
- TPB$12,750+27.5% total · +5.0% a year
PM at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: PM began trading on March 17, 2008, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust.
- PM's deepest decline since it began trading in 2008 was 42.9%, from June 2017 to March 2020. It took 15 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 17 full calendar years, PM's best was 2011, when it returned 39.8%, and its worst was 2018, when it lost 33.3%. It lost money in three of those years.
- PM is 2.8% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $312B
- Industry
- Tobacco
- Price history from
- March 2008
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +30.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +144%+34.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +159%+21.0% a year
- Past 10 years
- +242%+13.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +39.8%2011
- Worst calendar year
- −33.3%2018
- Losing years
- 3 of 17full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 23.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.94return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −42.9%Jun 2017 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- −2.8%below the peak
PM against the whole market
Where PM ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does PM rank among all stocks?
This section ranks PM on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how PM stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), PM ranks in the top 5% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | PM | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +30.9% | 950 of 3,287 | top 29% |
| 3-year return | +144% | 634 of 3,017 | top 21% |
| 5-year return | +159% | 417 of 2,893 | top 14% |
| 10-year return | +242% | 731 of 2,202 | top 33% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 23.4% | 227 of 2,893 | top 8% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.94 | 142 of 2,893 | top 5% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −42.9% | 223 of 2,187 | top 10% |
What has beaten PM on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). PM sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than PM with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- One stock and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than PM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half PM's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 19% less than PM's 23.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.94 for PM.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to PM. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than PM?
Investments that beat PM over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX and DXJ.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat PM over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks PM's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than PM follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than PM's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× PM's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than PM's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with PM?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.23 | 0.09% | |||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 48 of 3,599 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.10 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.29 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.34 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.26 | — | |
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.16 | 0.48% | |
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.27 | — | ||
SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatility | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.20 | 0.80% | |
What these numbers mean for PM
- Annual return
- PM returned 21.0% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $25,900. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- PM's volatility over the past 5 years was 23.4%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PM's return lands within 23.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- PM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.94, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PM earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- PM's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 42.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 42.9% fall takes a 75.0% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, PM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.23 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PM holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than PM with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with PM | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.34 | — | |
| 2 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.16 | 0.48% |
PM against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against PM, compared period by period and year by year.
How do PM's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at PM, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the nine popular alternatives earned more than PM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Five of the nine popular alternatives earned less than PM over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, PM returned 21.0% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (23.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than PM with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| PM This pagePhilip Morris International Inc. | +21.0% | 23.4% |
| BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. | +18.7% | 22.0% |
| MO Altria Group, Inc. | +17.8% | 21.4% |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | +14.7% | 16.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | +9.7% | 25.0% |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | +7.4% | 43.1% |
| UVV Universal Corporation | +2.0% | 24.8% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | −0.5% | 19.1% |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | −7.8% | 25.4% |
| DEO Diageo plc | −11.9% | 25.6% |
Has PM consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares PM with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than PM helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the nine popular alternatives outperformed PM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was TPB.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than PM over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| PM Philip Morris International Inc. (this page) | — | +7.5% | +4.6% | +29.0% | +27.9% | +30.9% | +144% | +159% | +242% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | — | $312B | — |
| TPB TobaccoTurning Point Brands, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | +5.1% | −20.0% | −23.6% | −41.4% | −26.2% | +206% | +43.2% | +441% | 43.1% | 0.39 | −72.8% | — | $1.3B | — |
| KO Beverages - Non-AlcoholicThe Coca-Cola Company | 3/5 short0/3 long | +7.3% | +14.5% | +25.4% | +37.9% | +40.2% | +86.8% | +98.2% | +204% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | — | $402B | — |
| MO TobaccoAltria Group, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +8.9% | +1.6% | +19.1% | +36.6% | +23.7% | +118% | +126% | +140% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | — | $125B | — |
| DEO Beverages - AlcoholicDiageo plc | 2/5 short0/3 long | +9.0% | +11.5% | +15.2% | +9.7% | −2.4% | −32.5% | −46.8% | +11.7% | 25.6% | -0.37 | −63.4% | — | $52B | — |
| BUD Beverages - AlcoholicAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 2/5 short0/3 long | +6.9% | +3.1% | +12.3% | +32.7% | +36.7% | +66.6% | +58.7% | −20.0% | 25.0% | 0.50 | −69.8% | — | $166B | — |
| STZ Beverages - AlcoholicConstellation Brands, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +12.1% | −0.4% | −15.7% | −4.0% | −3.3% | −38.5% | −33.2% | −6.6% | 25.4% | -0.19 | −56.0% | — | $22B | — |
| BTI TobaccoBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +7.7% | −3.9% | +6.7% | +9.2% | +22.5% | +148% | +136% | +98.2% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | — | $128B | — |
| PEP Beverages - Non-AlcoholicPepsiCo, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.4% | 0.0% | −12.8% | −2.9% | −9.2% | −6.7% | −2.3% | +72.6% | 19.1% | 0.07 | −30.3% | — | $183B | — |
| UVV TobaccoUniversal Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −6.7% | −24.1% | −20.5% | −19.4% | −20.6% | +4.0% | +10.5% | +25.6% | 24.8% | 0.21 | −45.7% | — | $987M | — |
How did PM do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2009, along with where PM ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with PM and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: PM began trading on March 17, 2008, so the table starts with 2009, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, PM finished in the top quarter in six of 17 years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 10.
- PM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in seven of its 17 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, TPB came out ahead of PM most often, in six of the nine years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of PM; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places PM among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of PM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM This pagePhilip Morris International Inc. | — | +38.0% | +34.3% | −1.8% | +12.3% | +20.8% | +3.7% | +35.0% | −33.3% | +19.9% | +8.6% | +13.4% | −2.1% | +8.5% | +9.5% | +39.8% | +27.2% | +16.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 17 | 3 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 5 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 5 of 10 | 4 of 9 | 5 of 9 | 7 of 9 | 9 of 9 | 7 of 9 | 1 of 9 | 3 of 9 | 6 of 8 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10 of 17 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | 6 of 9 | +81.0% | +130% | +23.0% | −42.2% | −14.8% | +57.1% | +5.6% | +29.5% | +72.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 4 of 17 | +15.6% | +8.9% | −4.4% | +10.6% | +11.4% | +2.5% | +20.6% | +6.8% | +14.3% | −0.3% | +5.2% | +5.3% | +17.2% | +6.5% | +9.5% | +19.0% | +30.4% |
| MO Altria Group, Inc. | 10 of 17 | +18.2% | +40.8% | −3.7% | +4.4% | +24.2% | −10.2% | +7.9% | −27.1% | +9.4% | +20.4% | +23.1% | +34.5% | +28.4% | +11.8% | +27.7% | +34.0% | +40.3% |
| DEO Diageo plc | 6 of 17 | −29.3% | −10.1% | −16.3% | −17.4% | +41.7% | −3.3% | +21.4% | −0.4% | +44.2% | −1.9% | −1.4% | −11.4% | +16.3% | +37.0% | +21.6% | +11.0% | +27.5% |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 5 of 16 | +30.5% | −21.3% | +9.0% | +0.1% | −12.7% | −14.0% | +27.7% | −38.8% | +9.6% | −12.7% | +14.9% | +8.4% | +25.6% | +46.5% | +8.8% | +10.9% | — |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 9 of 17 | −36.0% | −7.1% | +5.8% | −6.4% | +16.1% | +17.4% | +19.8% | −28.7% | +50.7% | +8.7% | +46.2% | +39.5% | +98.9% | +71.2% | −6.7% | +39.0% | +1.1% |
| BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. | 9 of 17 | +66.4% | +35.5% | −19.9% | +14.2% | +7.8% | −4.7% | +42.8% | −49.5% | +24.5% | +5.8% | +6.8% | +4.9% | +10.5% | +11.3% | +27.9% | +26.0% | +28.4% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 4 of 17 | −1.8% | −7.6% | −3.3% | +6.8% | +20.5% | +11.7% | +27.4% | −4.8% | +17.8% | +7.8% | +8.8% | +17.3% | +24.6% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +14.6% |
| UVV Universal Corporation | 7 of 17 | +2.3% | −13.4% | +35.8% | +1.8% | +19.6% | −9.0% | +11.1% | +7.8% | −14.8% | +18.0% | +33.1% | −16.2% | +13.6% | +13.2% | +18.4% | −7.0% | +61.0% |
Risk and diversification
How PM has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were PM's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents PM's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2008, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: PM began trading on March 17, 2008, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In four of PM's five worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: PM fell 42.9% from June 2017 to March 2020, while the S&P 500 slipped only 3.9%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 20 months, after PM fell 22.8% from February to September 2022.
Green means PM fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | PM fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Late-2018 sell-off | −42.9% | −3.9% | Jun 2017 | Mar 2020 | 2.8 years | Jun 2021 | 15 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −40.8% | −45.1% | Aug 2008 | Mar 2009 | 7 months | Mar 2010 | 12 months |
| 2022 bear market | −22.8% | −17.3% | Feb 2022 | Sep 2022 | 7 months | May 2024 | 20 months |
| No named crash | −20.6% | +14.0% | Jun 2025 | Oct 2025 | 4 months | Feb 2026 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −19.3% | +11.4% | Apr 2013 | Feb 2014 | 10 months | Oct 2015 | 20 months |
How did PM do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far PM, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: PM began trading on March 17, 2008, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust or the 2008 financial crisis. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- PM fell less than the S&P 500 in six of the eight crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when PM fell 13.6% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
- Among its popular alternatives, KO held up best, falling less than PM in six of the eight crashes they both traded through.
- PM began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but seven of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was MO's 38.6%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than PM.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM This pagePhilip Morris International Inc. | — | −2.4% | −22.8% | −31.9% | −26.1% | −4.6% | −10.0% | −13.6% | −1.2% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1 of 8 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | 0 of 5 | −9.1% | −47.9% | −43.2% | −37.8% | −6.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 6 of 8 | −1.4% | −16.7% | −37.0% | −8.8% | −7.8% | −8.8% | −8.3% | 0.0% | −40.6% | −31.3% |
| MO Altria Group, Inc. | 4 of 8 | −0.4% | −25.8% | −31.6% | −26.6% | −7.7% | −8.5% | −7.6% | 0.0% | −38.6% | −35.8% |
| DEO Diageo plc | 3 of 8 | −0.5% | −24.7% | −36.2% | −8.3% | −4.9% | −12.9% | −12.9% | −0.8% | −53.2% | −22.3% |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 1 of 8 | −1.3% | −33.1% | −52.2% | −28.1% | −7.7% | −14.8% | −16.2% | −2.2% | — | — |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2 of 8 | −3.8% | −16.3% | −49.3% | −31.1% | −3.3% | −12.4% | −22.5% | −5.5% | −58.4% | −30.2% |
| BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. | 2 of 8 | −2.3% | −21.0% | −36.6% | −33.0% | −8.2% | −14.5% | −11.6% | −2.0% | −41.7% | −20.5% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 6 of 8 | −0.8% | −11.9% | −28.3% | −12.3% | −7.2% | −10.2% | −8.3% | −0.2% | −40.4% | −33.0% |
| UVV Universal Corporation | 4 of 8 | −1.6% | −28.8% | −24.1% | −21.8% | −2.7% | −9.9% | −13.8% | −6.7% | −59.9% | −25.5% |
How closely does PM move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares PM with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, PM captured 70% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 60% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.58. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only KO had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than PM's 1.17, out of nine popular alternatives with the same record.
- KO took just 44% of the S&P 500's losses, against 60% for PM, while still keeping 57% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than PM's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM This pagePhilip Morris International Inc. | 70% | 60% | 1.17 | 0.58 |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 57% | 44% | 1.29 | 0.47 |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | 102% | 89% | 1.15 | 0.78 |
| MO Altria Group, Inc. | 51% | 51% | 1.01 | 0.53 |
| BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. | 51% | 67% | 0.76 | 0.55 |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 48% | 65% | 0.75 | 0.48 |
| UVV Universal Corporation | 51% | 86% | 0.59 | 0.66 |
| DEO Diageo plc | 46% | 94% | 0.48 | 0.61 |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 48% | 111% | 0.44 | 0.79 |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 51% | 125% | 0.40 | 1.04 |
What diversifies PM?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with PM's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing PM with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in PM into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+20.2% for PM alone, +22.1% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and SMH have moved largely independently of PM over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.43 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- CLS made money in two of the three calendar years in which PM lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which PM lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% PM and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2018 | 2014 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM Philip Morris International Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +159% | 0.94 | −1.8% | −33.3% | −2.1% | 23.1% | +20.2% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.16 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | −19.8% | +8.1% | 19.1% | +22.1% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.43 | +101% | 1.04 | +8.0% | −8.7% | +23.8% | 19.9% | +19.7% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.01 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | −9.1% | +30.2% | 19.7% | +25.1% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.40 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +20.1% | −9.5% | +3.4% | 19.5% | +19.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.30 | +126% | 0.96 | +12.7% | −1.9% | −2.2% | 19.8% | +20.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.20 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | −0.9% | — | 19.7% | +21.2% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.34 | +177% | 0.93 | −0.6% | −18.2% | −8.7% | 20.8% | +21.5% |
| FDVV Dividend & IncomeFidelity High Dividend ETF | 0.46 | +85.9% | 0.92 | +18.0% | −1.2% | — | 20.0% | +19.4% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2018 | 2014 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM Philip Morris International Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +159% | 0.94 | −1.8% | −33.3% | −2.1% | 23.1% | +20.2% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.25 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | −24.5% | +23.0% | 20.4% | +24.4% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.05 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | −16.3% | +12.9% | 21.4% | +38.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | -0.05 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +0.8% | −10.4% | 20.1% | +34.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.25 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | −28.4% | +29.3% | 20.4% | +23.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.14 | +690% | 1.41 | +30.4% | −8.2% | +0.4% | 20.4% | +26.7% |
Common questions
What was PM's worst drawdown?
PM's deepest decline since it began trading in 2008 was 42.9%, from June 2017 to March 2020. It took 15 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because PM launched in March 2008, that record does not include the dot-com bust.
What were PM's best and worst years?
Over 17 full calendar years, PM's best year was 2011, when it returned 39.8%. Its worst was 2018, with a return of -33.3%.
Is there a better investment than PM?
Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than PM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX and DXJ.
Is PM more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. PM's volatility over the past 5 years was 23.4%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, PM's return lands within 23.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is PM's Sharpe ratio?
PM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.94, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so PM earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is PM with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, PM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.23 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against PM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a PM holding.
What are the best alternatives to PM?
None of the nine popular alternatives we compared outperformed PM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about PM's strength than about its alternatives.
Did PM outperform the S&P 500?
PM finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in seven of 17 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +38.0%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did PM do in stock market crashes?
PM fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in six of the eight major crashes it has traded through, and further in one. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when PM fell 13.6% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
What diversifies PM?
These had a low correlation with PM over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.16), EMLP (correlation 0.43) and SMH (correlation -0.01); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.25), CLS (correlation -0.05) and FIX (correlation -0.05). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than PM's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of PM's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to PM
KOCoca-Cola
MOAltria Group
DEODiageo
BUDAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
BTIBritish American Tobacco p.l.c.
PEPPepsiCo