Relative Intelligence · Tobacco

How Altria Group (MO) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on MO alone. It places MO (Altria Group, Inc.) against 9 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where MO stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: MO's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowMO has outpaced the market, rising 19.1% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 6 months, PM (Philip Morris International) rose 29.0% and TPB (Turning Point Brands) fell 23.6%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?MO rose 1.6% over the past 3 months, 2.5 points behind the tobacco ETF XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF), which rose 4.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. On the flip side, last month cut against the tape: MO rose 8.9% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, MO rose 23.7% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (118% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termMO turned $10,000 into $24,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: MO rose 126% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashMO fell less than the S&P 500 in five of seven sell-offs, but the late-2018 sell-off broke the pattern: it fell 26.6%, more than the S&P 500's 19.3%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, MO has a correlation of 0.30 over 5 years, less closely than 70% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- CCEP (Coca-Cola Europacific Partners, food & beverages) was ahead of MO in most short and long periods.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only six of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) and EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF).
How much would $10,000 in MO have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in MO over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of MO over the same span and MO's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in MO at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $372,045 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of MO, and AAPL finished highest, at $20,534,853.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 157 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- MSFT$508,386+4,984% total · +14.5% a year
- LLY$396,376+3,864% total · +13.5% a year
- BTI$388,024+3,780% total · +13.4% a year
- MO$372,045+3,620% total · +13.3% a year
- STZ$228,856+2,189% total · +11.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- PEP$64,589+546% total · +6.6% a year
- KO$60,026+500% total · +6.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 671 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- DXJ$32,976+230% total · +27.0% a year
- MPLX$30,642+206% total · +25.1% a year
- ABBV$29,134+191% total · +23.8% a year
- DBJP$26,428+164% total · +21.5% a year
- PM$25,119+151% total · +20.2% a year
- BTI$22,055+121% total · +17.1% a year
- MO$21,729+117% total · +16.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- KO$18,994+89.9% total · +13.7% a year
- TPB$12,750+27.5% total · +5.0% a year
MO at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- MO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 65.4%, from November 1998 to February 2000. It took 13 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- MO is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, MO's best was 2000, when it returned 105%, and its worst was 1999, when it lost 54.5%. It lost money in six of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $125B
- Industry
- Tobacco
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +23.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +118%+29.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +126%+17.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +140%+9.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +105%2000
- Worst calendar year
- −54.5%1999
- Losing years
- 6 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 21.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.88return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −65.4%Nov 1998 to Feb 2000
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
MO against the whole market
Where MO ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does MO rank among all stocks?
This section ranks MO on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how MO stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- MO is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 4% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | MO | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +23.7% | 1,144 of 3,287 | top 35% |
| 3-year return | +118% | 783 of 3,017 | top 26% |
| 5-year return | +126% | 546 of 2,893 | top 19% |
| 10-year return | +140% | 1,126 of 2,202 | bottom 50% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 21.4% | 130 of 2,893 | top 4% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.88 | 198 of 2,893 | top 7% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −53.7% | 605 of 2,187 | top 28% |
What has beaten MO on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). MO sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than MO with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- One stock and five ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than MO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half MO's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 11% less than MO's 21.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.88 for MO.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to MO; faint dots are 2 more of the 6 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than MO?
Investments that beat MO over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among MO's popular alternatives, PM earned more than MO over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 21.0% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 17.8% a year at 21.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CCEP (food & beverages) was ahead of MO in most short and long periods.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only six of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ and EWP.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat MO over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks MO's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than MO follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than MO's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× MO's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than MO's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with MO?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.30 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against MO. 1 of 9 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.57 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 1 shownEverything else in Tobacco and the categories next to it (Alcoholic Beverages, Food & Beverages), plus MO's specific themes. 1 of 25 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.42 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 105 of 3,599 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.27 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.27 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.48 | — | ||
DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.21 | 0.45% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.51 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.28 | — | ||
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.57 | 0.40% | |
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.37 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for MO
- Annual return
- MO returned 17.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $22,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- MO's volatility over the past 5 years was 21.4%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MO's return lands within 21.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- MO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.88, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MO earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- MO's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 53.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 53.7% fall takes a 116% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, MO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.30 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MO holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 6 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than MO with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 5 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with MO | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.27 | 0.48% |
| 2 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.48 | — | |
| 3 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.21 | 0.45% |
| 4 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.35 | 0.80% |
| 5 | EWPiShares MSCI Spain ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +19.2% | 20.3% | 0.97 | −46.4% | +196% | 0.45 | 0.50% |
MO against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against MO, compared period by period and year by year.
How do MO's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at MO, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the nine popular alternatives earned more than MO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Five of the nine popular alternatives earned less than MO over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, MO returned 17.8% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (21.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than MO with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| PM Philip Morris International Inc. | +21.0% | 23.4% |
| BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. | +18.7% | 22.0% |
| MO This pageAltria Group, Inc. | +17.8% | 21.4% |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | +14.7% | 16.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | +9.7% | 25.0% |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | +7.4% | 43.1% |
| UVV Universal Corporation | +2.0% | 24.8% |
| TAP Molson Coors Beverage Company | +0.9% | 26.0% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | −0.5% | 19.1% |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | −7.8% | 25.4% |
Has MO consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares MO with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than MO helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the nine popular alternatives, PM, outperformed MO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- PM and KO earned more for the risk they took than MO (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than MO over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| MO Altria Group, Inc. (this page) | — | +8.9% | +1.6% | +19.1% | +36.6% | +23.7% | +118% | +126% | +140% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | — | $125B | — |
| PM QualifiedPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +7.5% | +4.6% | +29.0% | +27.9% | +30.9% | +144% | +159% | +242% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | — | $312B | — |
| TPB TobaccoTurning Point Brands, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | +5.1% | −20.0% | −23.6% | −41.4% | −26.2% | +206% | +43.2% | +441% | 43.1% | 0.39 | −72.8% | — | $1.3B | — |
| BTI TobaccoBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. | 0/5 short2/3 long | +7.7% | −3.9% | +6.7% | +9.2% | +22.5% | +148% | +136% | +98.2% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | — | $128B | — |
| KO Beverages - Non-AlcoholicThe Coca-Cola Company | 4/5 short1/3 long | +7.3% | +14.5% | +25.4% | +37.9% | +40.2% | +86.8% | +98.2% | +204% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | — | $402B | — |
| BUD Beverages - AlcoholicAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 2/5 short0/3 long | +6.9% | +3.1% | +12.3% | +32.7% | +36.7% | +66.6% | +58.7% | −20.0% | 25.0% | 0.50 | −69.8% | — | $166B | — |
| STZ Beverages - AlcoholicConstellation Brands, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +12.1% | −0.4% | −15.7% | −4.0% | −3.3% | −38.5% | −33.2% | −6.6% | 25.4% | -0.19 | −56.0% | — | $22B | — |
| PEP Beverages - Non-AlcoholicPepsiCo, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.4% | 0.0% | −12.8% | −2.9% | −9.2% | −6.7% | −2.3% | +72.6% | 19.1% | 0.07 | −30.3% | — | $183B | — |
| UVV TobaccoUniversal Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −6.7% | −24.1% | −20.5% | −19.4% | −20.6% | +4.0% | +10.5% | +25.6% | 24.8% | 0.21 | −45.7% | — | $987M | — |
| TAP Beverages - AlcoholicMolson Coors Beverage Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | +7.0% | −2.3% | −7.1% | −12.3% | −9.9% | −23.7% | +4.6% | −51.6% | 26.0% | 0.17 | −67.0% | — | $7.5B | — |
How did MO do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where MO ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with MO and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, MO finished in the top quarter in 11 of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 5 of 10.
- MO finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, TPB came out ahead of MO most often, in six of the nine years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of MO; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places MO among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of MO | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO This pageAltria Group, Inc. | — | +18.2% | +40.8% | −3.7% | +4.4% | +24.2% | −10.2% | +7.9% | −27.1% | +9.4% | +20.4% | +23.1% | +34.5% | +28.4% | +11.8% | +27.7% | +34.0% | +40.3% | −31.6% | +22.3% | +19.7% | +27.7% | +18.2% | +42.9% | −6.9% | +9.3% | +105% | −54.5% | +22.6% | +23.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 11 of 29 | 5 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 5 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 1 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 3 of 9 | 3 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 3 of 9 | 2 of 9 | 2 of 8 | 5 of 7 | 5 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 2 of 7 | 4 of 7 | 2 of 7 | 6 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 1 of 7 | 7 of 7 | 3 of 7 | 6 of 7 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 7 of 17 | +38.0% | +34.3% | −1.8% | +12.3% | +20.8% | +3.7% | +35.0% | −33.3% | +19.9% | +8.6% | +13.4% | −2.1% | +8.5% | +9.5% | +39.8% | +27.2% | +16.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | 6 of 9 | +81.0% | +130% | +23.0% | −42.2% | −14.8% | +57.1% | +5.6% | +29.5% | +72.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. | 15 of 29 | +66.4% | +35.5% | −19.9% | +14.2% | +7.8% | −4.7% | +42.8% | −49.5% | +24.5% | +5.8% | +6.8% | +4.9% | +10.5% | +11.3% | +27.9% | +26.0% | +28.4% | −30.0% | +44.1% | +30.3% | +35.7% | +31.2% | +49.6% | +22.2% | +13.9% | +70.2% | −38.0% | +26.9% | +22.9% |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 11 of 29 | +15.6% | +8.9% | −4.4% | +10.6% | +11.4% | +2.5% | +20.6% | +6.8% | +14.3% | −0.3% | +5.2% | +5.3% | +17.2% | +6.5% | +9.5% | +19.0% | +30.4% | −24.0% | +30.4% | +23.2% | −0.8% | −16.2% | +18.2% | −5.5% | −21.9% | +6.1% | −12.2% | +1.3% | +27.9% |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 4 of 16 | +30.5% | −21.3% | +9.0% | +0.1% | −12.7% | −14.0% | +27.7% | −38.8% | +9.6% | −12.7% | +14.9% | +8.4% | +25.6% | +46.5% | +8.8% | +10.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 14 of 29 | −36.0% | −7.1% | +5.8% | −6.4% | +16.1% | +17.4% | +19.8% | −28.7% | +50.7% | +8.7% | +46.2% | +39.5% | +98.9% | +71.2% | −6.7% | +39.0% | +1.1% | −33.3% | −18.5% | +10.6% | +12.8% | +41.3% | +38.8% | +10.7% | +46.0% | +14.9% | −11.7% | +4.5% | +94.0% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 9 of 29 | −1.8% | −7.6% | −3.3% | +6.8% | +20.5% | +11.7% | +27.4% | −4.8% | +17.8% | +7.8% | +8.8% | +17.3% | +24.6% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +14.6% | −26.0% | +23.8% | +7.9% | +15.3% | +13.8% | +12.1% | −12.2% | −0.6% | +42.6% | −12.4% | +14.3% | +25.7% |
| UVV Universal Corporation | 10 of 29 | +2.3% | −13.4% | +35.8% | +1.8% | +19.6% | −9.0% | +11.1% | +7.8% | −14.8% | +18.0% | +33.1% | −16.2% | +13.6% | +13.2% | +18.4% | −7.0% | +61.0% | −39.5% | +7.8% | +18.2% | −5.8% | +11.9% | +23.8% | +5.4% | +7.8% | +62.5% | −32.2% | −12.1% | +32.2% |
| TAP Molson Coors Beverage Company | 12 of 29 | −15.5% | −3.4% | +22.1% | +14.4% | +4.1% | −15.2% | −0.4% | −29.9% | −14.1% | +5.4% | +28.7% | +35.7% | +34.6% | +1.3% | −10.7% | +13.9% | −5.7% | −3.8% | +37.0% | +16.4% | −9.7% | +36.6% | −7.0% | +16.3% | −32.5% | +54.9% | −5.8% | +72.5% | +78.4% |
Risk and diversification
How MO has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were MO's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents MO's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: MO fell 65.4% from November 1998 to February 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 18.5%.
- The slowest recovery came after MO fell 53.7% from June 2017 to March 2020; it did not regain that peak until July 2024, four years later.
- In three of MO's four worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
Green means MO fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | MO fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −65.4% | +18.5% | Nov 1998 | Feb 2000 | 15 months | Mar 2001 | 13 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −53.7% | −3.9% | Jun 2017 | Mar 2020 | 2.8 years | Jul 2024 | 4.3 years |
| Dot-com bust | −48.4% | −16.4% | Jun 2002 | Apr 2003 | 10 months | Dec 2003 | 8 months |
| No named crash | −46.3% | — | Sep 1992 | Apr 1993 | 7 months | Jun 1995 | 2.2 years |
| 2008 financial crisis | −38.6% | −45.4% | Jan 2008 | Nov 2008 | 10 months | Apr 2010 | 17 months |
How did MO do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far MO, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- MO fell less than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when MO fell 38.6% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than MO in most of the crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than MO.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO This pageAltria Group, Inc. | — | −0.4% | −25.8% | −31.6% | −26.6% | −7.7% | −8.5% | −7.6% | 0.0% | −38.6% | −35.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3 of 8 | −2.4% | −22.8% | −31.9% | −26.1% | −4.6% | −10.0% | −13.6% | −1.2% | — | — |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −9.1% | −47.9% | −43.2% | −37.8% | −6.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. | 2 of 10 | −2.3% | −21.0% | −36.6% | −33.0% | −8.2% | −14.5% | −11.6% | −2.0% | −41.7% | −20.5% |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 3 of 10 | −1.4% | −16.7% | −37.0% | −8.8% | −7.8% | −8.8% | −8.3% | 0.0% | −40.6% | −31.3% |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 0 of 8 | −1.3% | −33.1% | −52.2% | −28.1% | −7.7% | −14.8% | −16.2% | −2.2% | — | — |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −3.8% | −16.3% | −49.3% | −31.1% | −3.3% | −12.4% | −22.5% | −5.5% | −58.4% | −30.2% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −0.8% | −11.9% | −28.3% | −12.3% | −7.2% | −10.2% | −8.3% | −0.2% | −40.4% | −33.0% |
| UVV Universal Corporation | 4 of 10 | −1.6% | −28.8% | −24.1% | −21.8% | −2.7% | −9.9% | −13.8% | −6.7% | −59.9% | −25.5% |
| TAP Molson Coors Beverage Company | 2 of 10 | −4.2% | −20.7% | −36.9% | −16.6% | −8.5% | −12.1% | −17.0% | −2.0% | −43.6% | −45.4% |
How closely does MO move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares MO with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, MO captured 51% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 51% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.53. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only KO, PM and TPB had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than MO's 1.01, out of nine popular alternatives with the same record.
- KO took just 44% of the S&P 500's losses, against 51% for MO, while still keeping 57% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than MO's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO This pageAltria Group, Inc. | 51% | 51% | 1.01 | 0.53 |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 57% | 44% | 1.29 | 0.47 |
| PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 70% | 60% | 1.17 | 0.58 |
| TPB Turning Point Brands, Inc. | 102% | 89% | 1.15 | 0.78 |
| BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. | 51% | 67% | 0.76 | 0.55 |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 48% | 65% | 0.75 | 0.48 |
| UVV Universal Corporation | 51% | 86% | 0.59 | 0.66 |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 48% | 111% | 0.44 | 0.79 |
| BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 51% | 125% | 0.40 | 1.04 |
| TAP Molson Coors Beverage Company | 23% | 103% | 0.23 | 0.75 |
What diversifies MO?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with MO's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing MO with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in MO into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+16.8% for MO alone, +17.7% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and DBEF have moved largely independently of MO over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.39 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, CLS and FIX have moved largely independently of MO over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.28 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which MO lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% MO and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2020 | 2018 | 2008 | 2002 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO Altria Group, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +126% | 0.88 | −3.7% | −10.2% | −27.1% | −31.6% | −6.9% | −54.5% | 22.1% | +16.8% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.27 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +3.9% | −19.8% | −20.8% | — | — | 18.5% | +19.3% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.08 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | +55.5% | −9.1% | −44.7% | −47.0% | — | 19.5% | +22.1% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.39 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +20.1% | +2.1% | −9.5% | — | — | — | 18.6% | +16.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.15 | +126% | 0.96 | +12.7% | +24.8% | −1.9% | +4.9% | — | — | 18.5% | +17.7% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.32 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | +28.2% | −0.9% | — | — | — | 19.4% | +18.3% |
| FDVV Dividend & IncomeFidelity High Dividend ETF | 0.49 | +85.9% | 0.92 | +18.0% | +2.8% | −1.2% | — | — | — | 19.3% | +16.6% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.41 | +109% | 0.90 | +14.2% | −0.2% | −11.1% | — | — | — | 19.7% | +17.4% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.20 | +153% | 0.89 | +29.0% | +31.5% | −9.9% | −45.3% | −24.4% | — | 19.4% | +18.6% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2020 | 2018 | 2008 | 2002 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO Altria Group, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +126% | 0.88 | −3.7% | −10.2% | −27.1% | −31.6% | −6.9% | −54.5% | 22.1% | +16.8% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.28 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | +10.1% | −24.5% | −39.6% | −8.3% | −36.8% | 19.8% | +21.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.05 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | −2.4% | −16.3% | −20.5% | −65.1% | +350% | 21.7% | +35.1% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.25 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +6.7% | +0.8% | −15.2% | −9.4% | −58.7% | 21.7% | +30.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.28 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | +27.1% | −28.4% | −40.4% | −27.2% | −71.3% | 19.7% | +20.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.27 | +690% | 1.41 | +30.4% | −27.4% | −8.2% | — | — | — | 20.4% | +23.6% |
Common questions
What was MO's worst drawdown?
MO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 65.4%, from November 1998 to February 2000. It took 13 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were MO's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, MO's best year was 2000, when it returned 105%. Its worst was 1999, with a return of -54.5%.
Is there a better investment than MO?
Among MO's popular alternatives, PM earned more than MO over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 21.0% a year at 23.4% volatility, against 17.8% a year at 21.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CCEP (food & beverages) was ahead of MO in most short and long periods.
Is MO more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. MO's volatility over the past 5 years was 21.4%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MO's return lands within 21.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is MO's Sharpe ratio?
MO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.88, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MO earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is MO with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, MO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.30 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MO holding.
What are the best alternatives to MO?
Of the nine popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed MO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: PM.
Did MO outperform the S&P 500?
MO finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +18.2%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did MO do in stock market crashes?
MO fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in seven of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when MO fell 38.6% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies MO?
These had a low correlation with MO over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.27), SMH (correlation 0.08) and DBEF (correlation 0.39); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.28), CLS (correlation 0.05) and FIX (correlation 0.25). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than MO's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of MO's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to MO
PMPhilip Morris International
BTIBritish American Tobacco p.l.c.
KOCoca-Cola
BUDAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
PEPPepsiCo