Relative Intelligence · Pharmaceuticals

How AbbVie (ABBV) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ABBV alone. It places ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ABBV stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ABBV's full trading record, from December 2012 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, ABBV rose 43.8% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. ABBV has bounced back 26.2% from its April 2025 low after a 20.7% loss from March 2025 to April 2025 after falling while the S&P 500 fell 8.1%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?More than an industry move: ABBV rose 14.8% over the past 3 months, against 5.0% for the pharmaceuticals ETF IHE (iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF). The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: ABBV rose 9.9% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, ABBV rose 28.3% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (118% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termABBV turned $10,000 into $70,300 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. ABBV's 10-year return of 603% puts it ahead of 89% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashABBV fell less than the S&P 500 in three of four sell-offs, but the 2015 China and oil sell-off broke the pattern: it fell 29.8%, more than the S&P 500's 12.8%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, ABBV has a correlation of 0.17 over 5 years, less closely than 89% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. Over 10 years, ABBV's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.54: 92% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 57% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) fell less than ABBV in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade.
- Nearby categories and themes
- MCK (McKesson, health care distribution) earned more for the risk it took than ABBV over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 38.1%, against 45.1% for ABBV.
- Whole market
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ABBV with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How much would $10,000 in ABBV have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ABBV over the past 13 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ABBV over the same span and ABBV's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: ABBV began trading on December 10, 2012, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 13 years of ABBV's record, starting at the end of September 2013.
- $10,000 invested in ABBV at the end of September 2013 would have grown to $97,598 by September 2026, more than the $56,474 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ABBV, and NVDA finished highest, at $6,301,092.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2013 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 179 of the 2,311 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ABBV; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$6M+62,911% total · +64.2% a year
- LLY$293,821+2,838% total · +29.7% a year
- AAPL$227,163+2,172% total · +27.2% a year
- MPC$178,765+1,688% total · +24.8% a year
- GOOG$157,675+1,477% total · +23.6% a year
- ABBV$97,598+876% total · +19.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$56,474+465% total · +14.2% a year
- AMGN$54,013+440% total · +13.9% a year
- BIIB$9,382−6.2% total · −0.5% a year
- VTRS$5,805−41.9% total · −4.1% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 361 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ABBV; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MPC$71,516+615% total · +48.2% a year
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- MCK$43,941+339% total · +34.5% a year
- PSX$43,718+337% total · +34.3% a year
- ABBV$29,134+191% total · +23.8% a year
- AMGN$23,160+132% total · +18.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- VTRS$16,124+61.2% total · +10.0% a year
- BIIB$7,982−20.2% total · −4.4% a year
ABBV at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: ABBV began trading on December 10, 2012, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- ABBV is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- ABBV's deepest decline since it began trading in 2012 was 45.1%, from January 2018 to August 2019. It took 16 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 13 full calendar years, ABBV's best was 2013, when it returned 60.7%, and its worst was 2015, when it lost 6.5%. It lost money in three of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $511B
- Industry
- Drug Manufacturers - General
- Price history from
- December 2012
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +28.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +118%+29.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +218%+26.1% a year
- Past 10 years
- +603%+21.5% a year
- Best calendar year
- +60.7%2013
- Worst calendar year
- −6.5%2015
- Losing years
- 3 of 13full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 23.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.11return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −45.1%Jan 2018 to Aug 2019
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
ABBV against the whole market
Where ABBV ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ABBV rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ABBV on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ABBV stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), ABBV ranks in the top 2% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ABBV | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +28.3% | 1,021 of 3,287 | top 31% |
| 3-year return | +118% | 779 of 3,017 | top 26% |
| 5-year return | +218% | 279 of 2,893 | top 10% |
| 10-year return | +603% | 232 of 2,202 | top 11% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 23.4% | 229 of 2,893 | top 8% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.11 | 46 of 2,893 | top 2% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −45.1% | 291 of 2,187 | top 13% |
What has beaten ABBV on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ABBV sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ABBV with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- None of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ABBV over the past 5 years with less volatility: nothing sits in the green region.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ABBV. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than ABBV?
Investments that beat ABBV over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ABBV's popular alternatives, LLY fell less than ABBV in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MCK (health care distribution) earned more for the risk it took than ABBV over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 38.1%, against 45.1% for ABBV.
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than ABBV with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ABBV over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ABBV's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ABBV's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ABBV's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ABBV's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ABBV?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.17 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ABBV. 1 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 2 shownEverything else in Pharmaceuticals and the categories next to it (Biotechnology, Health Care Distribution, Life Sciences Tools, Medical Devices), plus ABBV's specific themes. 2 of 106 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.07 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatility | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.07 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 8 of 3,507 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.13 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | 0.06 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.11 | 0.48% | |
CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Higher return in most periods | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.21 | — | |
VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Higher return in most periods | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | -0.06 | — | |
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher return in most periods | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.19 | — | |
EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Higher return, similar volatility | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.34 | 0.59% | |
What these numbers mean for ABBV
- Annual return
- ABBV returned 26.1% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $31,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ABBV's volatility over the past 5 years was 23.4%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ABBV's return lands within 23.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ABBV's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.11, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ABBV earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ABBV's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 45.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 45.1% fall takes a 82.1% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ABBV's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.17 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ABBV instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ABBV holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
ABBV against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ABBV, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ABBV's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ABBV, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives earned more than ABBV over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 15 of the 20 popular alternatives earned less than ABBV over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, ABBV returned 26.1% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (23.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than ABBV with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | +40.7% | 32.8% |
| ABBV This pageAbbVie Inc. | +26.1% | 23.4% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | +22.8% | 24.9% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | +19.6% | 24.9% |
| NVS Novartis AG | +17.2% | 20.7% |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | +16.3% | 24.8% |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | +12.7% | 17.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| TAK Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | +11.8% | 19.4% |
| VTRS Viatris Inc. | +10.4% | 33.6% |
| GSK GSK plc | +9.5% | 24.5% |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | +8.7% | 35.7% |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | +7.7% | 31.1% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | +5.5% | 24.9% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | +2.9% | 27.8% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | +1.3% | 34.7% |
| SNY Sanofi | +0.6% | 25.3% |
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | −1.0% | 40.7% |
| ABT Abbott Laboratories | −1.7% | 23.1% |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | −1.7% | 25.4% |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | −1.8% | 34.7% |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | −4.0% | 39.1% |
Has ABBV consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ABBV with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ABBV helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives outperformed ABBV in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was LLY.
- LLY earned more for the risk it took than ABBV (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
- LLY outperformed ABBV over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so ABBV has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ABBV over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. (this page) | — | +9.9% | +14.8% | +43.8% | +29.8% | +28.3% | +118% | +218% | +603% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | — | $511B | — |
| LLY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralEli Lilly and Company | 1/5 short3/3 long | +10.2% | +12.1% | +40.0% | +19.4% | +59.7% | +124% | +451% | +1,807% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | — | $1.2T | — |
| VTRS Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericViatris Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +9.1% | +10.6% | +27.3% | +53.1% | +87.1% | +127% | +64.3% | −38.0% | 33.6% | 0.47 | −82.0% | — | $21B | — |
| AMGN Drug Manufacturers - GeneralAmgen Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +11.6% | +21.2% | +27.0% | +36.7% | +48.7% | +72.2% | +145% | +266% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | — | $237B | — |
| BIIB Drug Manufacturers - GeneralBiogen Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +11.0% | +21.6% | +32.6% | +36.7% | +65.8% | −5.6% | −8.8% | −18.9% | 34.7% | 0.11 | −72.7% | — | $36B | — |
| MRK Drug Manufacturers - GeneralMerck & Co., Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −0.8% | +19.9% | +28.3% | +42.2% | +76.8% | +58.3% | +113% | +241% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | — | $366B | — |
| GILD Drug Manufacturers - GeneralGilead Sciences, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +4.0% | +18.2% | +16.6% | +31.0% | +30.3% | +121% | +180% | +200% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | — | $194B | — |
| TAK Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericTakeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | 3/5 short0/3 long | +8.6% | +20.3% | +16.9% | +33.6% | +48.2% | +56.1% | +75.1% | +30.4% | 19.4% | 0.68 | −54.4% | — | $64B | — |
| WST Medical - Instruments & SuppliesWest Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +7.5% | +10.4% | +40.0% | +41.0% | +41.9% | +7.8% | −5.0% | +455% | 40.7% | 0.19 | −59.3% | — | $27B | — |
| IQV Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchIQVIA Holdings Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −0.8% | +31.4% | +51.5% | +18.8% | +26.3% | +45.3% | +6.5% | +260% | 34.7% | 0.21 | −51.5% | — | $44B | — |
| REGN BiotechnologyRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +1.2% | +20.3% | +8.0% | +4.4% | +40.7% | +0.8% | +44.9% | +120% | 31.1% | 0.40 | −59.7% | — | $83B | — |
| PFE Drug Manufacturers - GeneralPfizer Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +8.5% | +23.8% | +13.2% | +25.7% | +30.5% | +19.2% | −8.3% | +55.0% | 25.4% | 0.06 | −58.9% | — | $172B | — |
| TMO Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchThermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +4.3% | +30.7% | +30.9% | +16.3% | +26.8% | +49.5% | +15.1% | +366% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | — | $254B | — |
| JNJ Drug Manufacturers - GeneralJohnson & Johnson | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.8% | +4.8% | +13.6% | +27.1% | +36.9% | +84.6% | +82.1% | +196% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | — | $625B | — |
| BMY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralBristol-Myers Squibb Company | 1/5 short0/3 long | −0.5% | +3.6% | +6.6% | +19.1% | +47.8% | +25.8% | +30.6% | +74.8% | 24.9% | 0.34 | −47.7% | — | $126B | — |
| AZN Drug Manufacturers - GeneralAstraZeneca PLC | 0/5 short0/3 long | +0.4% | +3.3% | −15.3% | −7.0% | +1.8% | +38.8% | +52.1% | +257% | 35.7% | 0.41 | −28.7% | — | $262B | — |
| NVS Drug Manufacturers - GeneralNovartis AG | 0/5 short0/3 long | +9.0% | +2.7% | +1.8% | +13.1% | +18.8% | +75.9% | +121% | +226% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | — | $292B | — |
| ABT Medical - DevicesAbbott Laboratories | 0/5 short0/3 long | +0.3% | +1.6% | +8.4% | −15.3% | −18.7% | +13.0% | −8.0% | +204% | 23.1% | 0.04 | −39.6% | — | $178B | — |
| NVO Drug Manufacturers - GeneralNovo Nordisk A/S | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.1% | −20.0% | −1.5% | −23.9% | −28.5% | −57.0% | −18.5% | +134% | 39.1% | 0.09 | −75.2% | — | $174B | — |
| GSK Drug Manufacturers - GeneralGSK plc | 0/5 short0/3 long | −0.9% | +2.1% | −10.1% | +4.7% | +18.9% | +60.0% | +57.2% | +95.1% | 24.5% | 0.49 | −37.6% | — | $102B | — |
| SNY Drug Manufacturers - GeneralSanofi | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.6% | −5.9% | −10.3% | −10.7% | −13.4% | −10.0% | +3.0% | +61.5% | 25.3% | 0.15 | −33.5% | — | $99B | — |
How did ABBV do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2013, along with where ABBV ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ABBV and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: ABBV began trading on December 10, 2012, so the table starts with 2013, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ABBV finished in the top quarter in six of 13 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 21.
- ABBV finished ahead of the S&P 500 in eight of its 13 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, LLY came out ahead of ABBV most often, in ten of the 13 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ABBV; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ABBV among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ABBV | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABBV This pageAbbVie Inc. | — | +33.1% | +18.9% | −0.2% | +24.0% | +32.4% | +27.7% | +1.5% | −1.0% | +60.1% | +9.8% | −6.5% | +27.9% | +60.7% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 13 | 7 of 21 | 3 of 21 | 14 of 21 | 3 of 21 | 7 of 21 | 6 of 21 | 17 of 21 | 14 of 21 | 1 of 21 | 5 of 21 | 20 of 21 | 5 of 21 | 7 of 20 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 13 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 10 of 13 | +40.3% | +33.3% | +60.9% | +34.3% | +66.1% | +31.0% | +16.2% | +40.5% | +17.8% | −10.4% | +25.4% | +39.8% | +7.3% |
| VTRS Viatris Inc. | 4 of 13 | +5.0% | +19.7% | +2.0% | −14.3% | −26.2% | −6.8% | −26.6% | −35.2% | +10.9% | −29.4% | −4.1% | +29.9% | +58.1% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 5 of 13 | +29.7% | −6.8% | +13.5% | +20.4% | +0.9% | −2.0% | +27.6% | +15.2% | +22.3% | −7.6% | +4.0% | +42.3% | +34.8% |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 1 of 13 | +15.1% | −40.9% | −6.6% | +15.4% | −2.0% | −17.5% | −1.4% | −5.5% | +12.3% | −7.4% | −9.8% | +21.4% | +91.0% |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 6 of 13 | +9.8% | −6.3% | +1.0% | +49.4% | +1.8% | −7.2% | +22.3% | +40.0% | −1.5% | +15.0% | −3.9% | +16.9% | +26.9% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 4 of 13 | +36.6% | +18.7% | −2.0% | +23.6% | +29.9% | −6.7% | +7.9% | −9.9% | +3.0% | −27.6% | +8.6% | +25.5% | +105% |
| TAK Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | 2 of 13 | +22.7% | −3.2% | −4.8% | +20.1% | −21.6% | −3.0% | +22.1% | −38.8% | +41.3% | −14.0% | +24.4% | −6.5% | +7.4% |
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | 8 of 13 | −15.7% | −6.8% | +50.0% | −49.7% | +65.9% | +89.0% | +54.1% | −0.1% | +17.0% | +41.9% | +14.0% | +9.5% | +81.3% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 6 of 12 | +14.7% | −15.1% | +12.9% | −27.4% | +57.5% | +16.0% | +33.0% | +18.7% | +28.7% | +10.8% | +16.6% | +27.0% | — |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 4 of 13 | +9.0% | −18.9% | +21.7% | +14.2% | +30.7% | +28.7% | +0.5% | −0.7% | +2.4% | −32.4% | +32.3% | +49.0% | +60.9% |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 3 of 13 | +0.6% | −2.2% | −41.3% | −10.4% | +66.7% | +3.4% | −6.7% | +25.1% | +16.1% | +4.4% | +7.3% | +5.4% | +26.5% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 6 of 13 | +11.8% | −1.7% | −3.4% | −17.3% | +43.5% | +43.7% | +45.6% | +18.2% | +35.0% | −0.1% | +13.8% | +13.1% | +75.8% |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 4 of 13 | +47.5% | −4.8% | −8.6% | +6.0% | +11.4% | +10.8% | +16.2% | −5.1% | +24.4% | +15.3% | +1.2% | +17.3% | +34.6% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 3 of 13 | +0.1% | +15.8% | −26.1% | +19.0% | +2.9% | +0.4% | +27.7% | −12.9% | +7.7% | −13.5% | +19.3% | +14.2% | +70.0% |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 5 of 13 | +38.0% | −1.2% | +0.8% | +20.4% | +17.9% | +2.9% | +37.4% | +13.9% | +35.3% | −16.7% | +0.1% | +24.6% | +32.0% |
| NVS Novartis AG | 5 of 13 | +46.0% | −0.5% | +21.1% | +6.6% | −5.0% | +2.2% | +29.1% | +6.2% | +19.8% | −11.8% | −4.3% | +19.4% | +32.2% |
| ABT Abbott Laboratories | 4 of 13 | +12.9% | +4.8% | +2.3% | −20.7% | +30.5% | +28.1% | +22.1% | +29.1% | +52.0% | −12.3% | +1.9% | +20.1% | +24.3% |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4 of 13 | −39.2% | −15.9% | +54.8% | +22.6% | +63.5% | +23.3% | +28.7% | −11.8% | +54.3% | −36.6% | +39.3% | +16.7% | +15.3% |
| GSK GSK plc | 5 of 13 | +51.3% | −5.2% | +9.8% | −16.8% | +27.1% | −17.7% | +29.2% | +13.8% | −3.0% | +2.1% | −0.3% | −15.7% | +28.9% |
| SNY Sanofi | 4 of 13 | +4.9% | +1.1% | +6.5% | +0.5% | +7.0% | +0.4% | +20.5% | +6.0% | +9.9% | −1.2% | −3.4% | −11.9% | +17.1% |
Risk and diversification
How ABBV has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ABBV's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ABBV's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2012, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: ABBV began trading on December 10, 2012, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of ABBV's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ABBV fell 45.1% from January 2018 to August 2019, while the S&P 500 rose 2.1%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 19 months, after ABBV fell 31.6% from July to October 2015.
Green means ABBV fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ABBV fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Late-2018 sell-off | −45.1% | +2.1% | Jan 2018 | Aug 2019 | 19 months | Dec 2020 | 16 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −31.6% | −1.4% | Jul 2015 | Oct 2015 | 3 months | May 2017 | 19 months |
| 2022 bear market | −21.9% | −19.5% | Apr 2022 | Sep 2022 | 5 months | Jan 2024 | 16 months |
| No named crash | −20.7% | −8.1% | Mar 2025 | Apr 2025 | 1 month | Sep 2025 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −19.8% | −1.1% | Dec 2014 | Feb 2015 | 2 months | Jun 2015 | 4 months |
How did ABBV do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ABBV, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: ABBV began trading on December 10, 2012, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- ABBV fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the six crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when ABBV fell 21.9% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, LLY held up best, falling less than ABBV in five of the six crashes they both traded through.
- ABBV began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but 18 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was ABT's 22.3%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ABBV.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABBV This pageAbbVie Inc. | — | −1.5% | −21.9% | −32.1% | −18.1% | −5.8% | −29.8% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1 of 6 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 5 of 6 | −0.6% | −11.7% | −16.9% | −10.2% | −8.6% | −19.6% | −10.9% | 0.0% | −50.0% | −54.3% |
| VTRS Viatris Inc. | 0 of 6 | −6.9% | −43.3% | −37.3% | −32.8% | −6.8% | −31.9% | −32.4% | −0.1% | −64.4% | −47.3% |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 4 of 6 | −1.2% | −11.9% | −18.3% | −14.3% | −7.4% | −22.1% | −12.6% | −0.5% | −31.3% | −60.2% |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 2 of 6 | −2.5% | −22.4% | −21.2% | −21.7% | −9.3% | −24.6% | −19.4% | −0.6% | −52.7% | −59.8% |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 4 of 6 | −2.4% | −10.8% | −19.3% | −9.7% | −6.6% | −18.2% | −17.4% | −2.3% | −63.3% | −57.5% |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −1.6% | −20.0% | −13.7% | −22.7% | −5.5% | −28.7% | −18.2% | −2.1% | −34.3% | −53.6% |
| TAK Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | 4 of 6 | −0.6% | −14.8% | −31.5% | −27.9% | −6.5% | −17.0% | −5.6% | −3.7% | — | — |
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −1.6% | −44.2% | −26.2% | −24.9% | −8.5% | −14.6% | −23.1% | −1.5% | −45.1% | −41.9% |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 2 of 6 | −6.8% | −35.9% | −48.9% | −19.2% | −5.3% | −28.7% | — | — | — | — |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −0.2% | −25.8% | −12.7% | −17.3% | −7.3% | −37.7% | −23.2% | −7.2% | −49.9% | −71.6% |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 3 of 6 | −1.8% | −24.6% | −21.8% | −12.3% | −8.1% | −18.2% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −49.8% | −46.0% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 4 of 6 | −2.4% | −19.8% | −24.8% | −17.2% | −8.7% | −14.7% | −24.4% | −3.6% | −53.9% | −41.8% |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 4 of 6 | −1.1% | −12.7% | −25.4% | −16.9% | −8.2% | −9.0% | −9.8% | −0.1% | −34.4% | −35.9% |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 4 of 6 | −2.3% | −16.0% | −29.4% | −22.9% | −4.1% | −16.3% | −10.5% | 0.0% | −39.2% | −69.5% |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 4 of 6 | −0.5% | −25.7% | −22.6% | −11.4% | −6.4% | −18.0% | −16.4% | −1.1% | −37.4% | −43.5% |
| NVS Novartis AG | 3 of 6 | −1.1% | −20.4% | −25.5% | −9.9% | −6.6% | −30.1% | −14.5% | −2.6% | −41.7% | −25.7% |
| ABT Abbott Laboratories | 3 of 6 | −2.5% | −27.9% | −29.7% | −11.7% | −8.8% | −27.4% | −11.5% | −0.5% | −22.3% | −45.7% |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 5 of 6 | −1.1% | −21.4% | −23.7% | −13.8% | −3.9% | −20.8% | −23.1% | −1.7% | −40.9% | −51.0% |
| GSK GSK plc | 5 of 6 | −0.3% | −37.6% | −26.5% | −11.5% | −4.3% | −15.7% | −12.4% | −2.0% | −46.6% | −45.1% |
| SNY Sanofi | 3 of 6 | −0.5% | −33.5% | −25.2% | −9.0% | −9.8% | −30.2% | −20.7% | −2.8% | −46.6% | — |
How closely does ABBV move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ABBV with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, ABBV captured 92% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 57% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.54. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only LLY had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ABBV's 1.62, out of 20 popular alternatives with the same record.
- LLY took just 6% of the S&P 500's losses, against 57% for ABBV, while still keeping 101% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ABBV's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABBV This pageAbbVie Inc. | 92% | 57% | 1.62 | 0.54 |
| LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 101% | 6% | 15.73 | 0.37 |
| AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 60% | 39% | 1.52 | 0.39 |
| GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 52% | 36% | 1.44 | 0.35 |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 64% | 46% | 1.39 | 0.30 |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 64% | 53% | 1.20 | 0.46 |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 74% | 64% | 1.16 | 0.54 |
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | 107% | 99% | 1.09 | 1.08 |
| NVS Novartis AG | 69% | 64% | 1.08 | 0.49 |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 104% | 104% | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| ABT Abbott Laboratories | 76% | 79% | 0.96 | 0.64 |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 55% | 66% | 0.84 | 0.19 |
| GSK GSK plc | 51% | 61% | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 75% | 94% | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| IQV IQVIA Holdings Inc. | 128% | 167% | 0.77 | 1.31 |
| BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 55% | 75% | 0.73 | 0.41 |
| SNY Sanofi | 53% | 74% | 0.72 | 0.46 |
| PFE Pfizer Inc. | 52% | 81% | 0.65 | 0.54 |
| TAK Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | 34% | 58% | 0.58 | 0.44 |
| VTRS Viatris Inc. | 74% | 179% | 0.41 | 1.14 |
| BIIB Biogen Inc. | 35% | 91% | 0.38 | 0.28 |
What diversifies ABBV?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ABBV's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ABBV with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ABBV into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+23.8% for ABBV alone, +25.0% for the mix).
- FIX made money in three of the three calendar years in which ABBV lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of ABBV over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.27 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ABBV lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ABBV and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2018 | 2015 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +218% | 1.11 | −0.2% | −1.0% | −6.5% | 22.4% | +23.8% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.27 | +119% | 1.48 | +17.4% | −5.2% | — | 18.5% | +22.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.11 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | 18.4% | +25.0% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.19 | +101% | 1.04 | +8.0% | −8.7% | −25.3% | 18.7% | +22.7% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.46 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +1.8% | −3.0% | −0.3% | 19.4% | +21.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.05 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | −9.1% | −0.3% | 19.5% | +28.0% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.25 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +20.1% | −9.5% | +4.1% | 18.6% | +22.2% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.14 | +126% | 0.96 | +12.7% | −1.9% | −10.7% | 18.7% | +23.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.23 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | −0.9% | — | 19.3% | +24.1% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2018 | 2015 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABBV AbbVie Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +218% | 1.11 | −0.2% | −1.0% | −6.5% | 22.4% | +23.8% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.07 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | 19.0% | +27.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.02 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | −16.3% | −6.0% | 21.1% | +41.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | -0.02 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +0.8% | +67.7% | 19.9% | +37.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.07 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | −28.4% | −4.5% | 18.9% | +26.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.13 | +690% | 1.41 | +30.4% | −8.2% | +17.4% | 19.8% | +29.7% |
Common questions
What was ABBV's worst drawdown?
ABBV's deepest decline since it began trading in 2012 was 45.1%, from January 2018 to August 2019. It took 16 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because ABBV launched in December 2012, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or two other sell-offs.
What were ABBV's best and worst years?
Over 13 full calendar years, ABBV's best year was 2013, when it returned 60.7%. Its worst was 2015, with a return of -6.5%.
Is there a better investment than ABBV?
Among ABBV's popular alternatives, LLY fell less than ABBV in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MCK (health care distribution) earned more for the risk it took than ABBV over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 38.1%, against 45.1% for ABBV.
Is ABBV more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ABBV's volatility over the past 5 years was 23.4%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ABBV's return lands within 23.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ABBV's Sharpe ratio?
ABBV's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.11, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ABBV earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ABBV with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ABBV's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.17 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ABBV instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ABBV holding.
What are the best alternatives to ABBV?
None of the 20 popular alternatives we compared outperformed ABBV in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about ABBV's strength than about its alternatives.
Did ABBV outperform the S&P 500?
ABBV finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in eight of 13 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +33.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ABBV do in stock market crashes?
ABBV fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the six major crashes it has traded through, and further in one. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when ABBV fell 21.9% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies ABBV?
These had a low correlation with ABBV over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.27), DXJ (correlation 0.11) and EMLP (correlation 0.19); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.07), CLS (correlation -0.02) and FIX (correlation -0.02). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ABBV's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ABBV's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.