Relative Intelligence · Oil & Gas

How Marathon Petroleum (MPC) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on MPC alone. It places MPC (Marathon Petroleum Corporation) against 13 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where MPC stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: MPC's full trading record, from June 2011 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowMPC has run far ahead of the market, rising 123% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. After a 44.8% loss from April 2024 to April 2025, MPC has bounced 77.3% off the low. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?More than an industry move: MPC rose 51.1% over the past 3 months, against 20.3% for the oil & gas ETF CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF). The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: MPC rose 18.1% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, MPC rose 159% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (234% against 89.3%). On the flip side, MPC led its oil & gas peers in 2023, then fell behind VLO (Valero Energy) and PBF (PBF Energy) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termMPC turned $10,000 into $149,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. MPC's 10-year return of 1,387% puts it ahead of 97% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross five sell-offs, MPC has typically fallen 2.3 times as far as the S&P 500. In the Covid crash, MPC fell 72.4%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than VLO (Valero Energy, 61.3%) but less than PBF (PBF Energy, 78.8%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, MPC has a correlation of 0.26 over 5 years, less closely than 77% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. MPC moves far less with the S&P 500 than it used to, with a correlation of 0.26 over the past 5 years against 0.71 in the 5 years before. Market capture ↓
- Better optionsNothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MPC with less volatility over the past 5 years. Across the whole market, MPC outpaced 97% of stocks worth at least $300 million over the past decade. Better options ↓
How much would $10,000 in MPC have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in MPC over the past 15 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of MPC over the same span and MPC's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: MPC began trading on June 23, 2011, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash. It covers the most recent 15 years of MPC's record, starting at the end of September 2011.
- $10,000 invested in MPC at the end of September 2011 would have grown to $445,808 by September 2026, more than the $87,526 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of MPC, and NVDA finished highest, at $8,017,015.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2011 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 34 of the 2,130 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MPC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$8M+80,070% total · +56.2% a year
- FIX$2M+22,558% total · +43.6% a year
- TSLA$2M+21,667% total · +43.2% a year
- AVGO$1M+14,846% total · +39.6% a year
- TSM$545,694+5,357% total · +30.6% a year
- MPC$445,808+4,358% total · +28.8% a year
- VLO$399,578+3,896% total · +27.9% a year
- CVI$155,462+1,455% total · +20.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$87,526+775% total · +15.6% a year
- CLMT$47,442+374% total · +10.9% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 55 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MPC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- FIX$236,701+2,267% total · +88.3% a year
- MU$153,675+1,437% total · +72.7% a year
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- LPG$96,257+863% total · +57.3% a year
- AVGO$79,117+691% total · +51.2% a year
- MPC$71,516+615% total · +48.2% a year
- CLMT$66,220+562% total · +45.9% a year
- VLO$64,131+541% total · +45.0% a year
- CVI$43,250+333% total · +34.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
MPC at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: MPC began trading on June 23, 2011, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash.
- MPC's deepest decline since it began trading in 2011 was 79.7%, from October 2018 to March 2020. It took 23 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 14 full calendar years, MPC's best was 2012, when it returned 94.3%, and its worst was 2020, when it lost 27.4%. It lost money in three of those years.
- MPC is 2.0% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $133B
- Industry
- Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
- Price history from
- June 2011
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +159%total return
- Past 3 years
- +234%+49.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- +690%+51.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +1,387%+31.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +94.3%2012
- Worst calendar year
- −27.4%2020
- Losing years
- 3 of 14full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 33.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.41return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −79.7%Oct 2018 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- −2.0%below the peak
MPC against the whole market
Where MPC ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does MPC rank among all stocks?
This section ranks MPC on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how MPC stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), MPC ranks in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | MPC | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +159% | 64 of 3,287 | top 2% |
| 3-year return | +234% | 327 of 3,017 | top 11% |
| 5-year return | +690% | 43 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| 10-year return | +1,387% | 67 of 2,202 | top 3% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 33.4% | 1,025 of 2,893 | top 35% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.41 | 6 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −79.7% | 1,632 of 2,187 | bottom 26% |
What has beaten MPC on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). MPC sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than MPC with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- None of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MPC over the past 5 years with less volatility: nothing sits in the green region.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to MPC. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than MPC?
Investments that beat MPC over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MPC with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat MPC over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks MPC's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than MPC's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× MPC's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than MPC's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with MPC?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.26 | 0.09% | |||
| The whole marketbest 4 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 4 of 3,547 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.12 | — | ||
| On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +5,305% | 0.14 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.10 | — | ||
LPGDorian LPG Ltd. · Oil & Gas Midstream | On the frontierSmaller losses in recent crashes | +54.6% | 43.6% | 1.22 | −62.9% | +1,821% | 0.30 | — | |
What these numbers mean for MPC
- Annual return
- MPC returned 51.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $79,000. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- MPC's volatility over the past 5 years was 33.4%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MPC's return lands within 33.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- MPC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.41, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MPC earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- MPC's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 79.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 79.7% fall takes a 392% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, MPC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.26 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MPC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MPC holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
MPC against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against MPC, compared period by period and year by year.
How do MPC's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at MPC, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 13 popular alternatives earned more than MPC over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Eight of the 13 popular alternatives earned less than MPC over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, MPC returned 51.2% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (33.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than MPC with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| MPC This pageMarathon Petroleum Corporation | +51.2% | 33.4% |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | +44.2% | 36.9% |
| PBF PBF Energy Inc. | +42.9% | 59.1% |
| CLMT Calumet Inc. | +39.4% | 56.5% |
| PARR Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. | +38.9% | 50.6% |
| DK Delek US Holdings, Inc. | +34.0% | 52.7% |
| PSX Phillips 66 | +33.2% | 32.9% |
| CVI CVR Energy, Inc. | +32.2% | 52.3% |
| DINO HF Sinclair Corporation | +31.8% | 38.8% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | +27.1% | 26.5% |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | +23.5% | 18.8% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | +19.5% | 25.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| DKL Delek Logistics Partners, LP | +12.1% | 31.5% |
| DAR Darling Ingredients Inc. | −5.2% | 40.3% |
Has MPC consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares MPC with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than MPC helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 13 popular alternatives outperformed MPC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was VLO.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than MPC over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation (this page) | — | +18.1% | +51.1% | +123% | +191% | +159% | +234% | +690% | +1,387% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | — | $133B | — |
| VLO Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingValero Energy Corporation | 1/5 short1/3 long | +10.2% | +38.9% | +93.2% | +166% | +176% | +259% | +524% | +1,061% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | — | $125B | — |
| CVI Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingCVR Energy, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +16.4% | +79.1% | +106% | +147% | +78.5% | +115% | +304% | +1,424% | 52.3% | 0.80 | −79.9% | — | $6.2B | — |
| CLMT Chemicals - SpecialtyCalumet Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.6% | +29.0% | +74.8% | +187% | +198% | +235% | +427% | +1,319% | 56.5% | 0.87 | −90.4% | — | $4.9B | — |
| PBF Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingPBF Energy Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +14.5% | +30.5% | +122% | +196% | +189% | +89.0% | +495% | +427% | 59.1% | 0.90 | −91.5% | — | $9.8B | — |
| DINO Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingHF Sinclair Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +14.7% | +39.5% | +119% | +174% | +146% | +152% | +298% | +649% | 38.8% | 0.91 | −77.3% | — | $22B | — |
| DK Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingDelek US Holdings, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +4.4% | +20.5% | +106% | +165% | +132% | +226% | +332% | +524% | 52.7% | 0.82 | −84.3% | — | $4.8B | — |
| DKL Oil & Gas MidstreamDelek Logistics Partners, LP | 0/5 short0/3 long | +2.6% | +5.5% | +18.9% | +29.4% | +41.3% | +80.0% | +77.2% | +511% | 31.5% | 0.52 | −82.7% | — | $3.3B | — |
| PARR Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingPar Pacific Holdings, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.8% | +9.7% | +43.9% | +138% | +138% | +161% | +417% | +504% | 50.6% | 0.91 | −76.4% | — | $4.3B | — |
| PSX Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingPhillips 66 | 0/5 short0/3 long | +11.2% | +40.1% | +89.2% | +128% | +130% | +183% | +319% | +430% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | — | $117B | — |
| MPLX Oil & Gas MidstreamMPLX Lp | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.2% | +4.1% | +8.8% | +14.7% | +27.2% | +105% | +187% | +350% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | — | $59B | — |
| DAR Packaged FoodsDarling Ingredients Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −6.4% | −6.7% | +0.2% | +57.3% | +86.2% | +42.0% | −23.4% | +342% | 40.3% | 0.07 | −68.3% | — | $9.3B | — |
| CVX Oil & Gas IntegratedChevron Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +10.8% | +20.0% | +25.4% | +48.8% | +51.9% | +53.4% | +144% | +238% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | — | $446B | — |
| XOM Oil & Gas IntegratedExxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +12.4% | +20.7% | +22.0% | +47.9% | +62.4% | +76.7% | +232% | +214% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | — | $731B | — |
How did MPC do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2012, along with where MPC ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with MPC and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: MPC began trading on June 23, 2011, so the table starts with 2012, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, MPC finished in the top quarter in six of 14 years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 14.
- MPC finished ahead of the S&P 500 in eight of its 14 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, CVI came out ahead of MPC most often, in eight of the 14 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of MPC; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places MPC among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of MPC | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPC This pageMarathon Petroleum Corporation | — | +19.2% | −4.0% | +30.4% | +86.6% | +61.0% | −27.4% | +6.0% | −8.2% | +34.8% | +0.7% | +17.4% | +0.4% | +48.6% | +94.3% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 3 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 3 of 14 | 4 of 9 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 14 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 6 of 14 | +37.0% | −2.9% | +5.9% | +75.0% | +40.3% | −35.7% | +30.3% | −15.7% | +40.0% | +0.7% | +46.8% | +0.3% | +65.0% | +66.3% |
| CVI CVR Energy, Inc. | 8 of 14 | +35.8% | −34.9% | +11.6% | +115% | +93.5% | −60.9% | +27.6% | +1.1% | +63.5% | −25.1% | +8.0% | +1.3% | +20.1% | +161% |
| CLMT Calumet Inc. | 5 of 14 | −9.8% | +23.2% | +5.9% | +27.9% | +322% | −14.2% | +65.2% | −71.3% | +92.5% | −79.1% | −1.6% | −5.5% | −7.2% | +64.6% |
| PBF PBF Energy Inc. | 4 of 13 | +6.7% | −38.0% | +10.0% | +216% | +82.7% | −77.1% | +0.1% | −4.9% | +33.6% | −20.5% | +43.7% | −11.5% | +12.7% | — |
| DINO HF Sinclair Corporation | 4 of 14 | +38.2% | −34.4% | +11.0% | +62.0% | +28.0% | −46.5% | +1.9% | +2.0% | +63.2% | −14.1% | +9.6% | −19.9% | +14.0% | +117% |
| DK Delek US Holdings, Inc. | 6 of 14 | +68.7% | −25.0% | −0.8% | +84.0% | −6.7% | −49.5% | +6.6% | −4.9% | +48.8% | +1.6% | −7.8% | −18.2% | +40.5% | +127% |
| DKL Delek Logistics Partners, LP | 5 of 13 | +17.2% | +8.8% | +4.3% | +14.4% | +45.9% | +14.3% | +21.6% | +2.2% | +20.8% | −12.3% | +6.3% | +17.7% | +44.3% | — |
| PARR Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. | 5 of 13 | +114% | −54.9% | +56.4% | +41.0% | +17.9% | −39.9% | +63.9% | −26.5% | +32.6% | −38.2% | +44.9% | −27.1% | +85.8% | — |
| PSX Phillips 66 | 3 of 13 | +17.5% | −11.6% | +33.1% | +49.6% | +8.4% | −33.9% | +34.0% | −12.3% | +20.9% | +9.0% | +17.1% | −4.7% | +48.3% | — |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | 4 of 13 | +20.6% | +41.7% | +22.5% | +21.1% | +54.0% | −1.8% | −8.2% | −8.4% | +8.9% | −6.3% | −44.8% | +69.0% | +46.9% | — |
| DAR Darling Ingredients Inc. | 5 of 14 | +6.9% | −32.4% | −20.4% | −9.7% | +20.1% | +105% | +45.9% | +6.1% | +40.4% | +22.7% | −42.1% | −13.0% | +30.2% | +20.7% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 4 of 14 | +10.1% | +1.3% | −13.6% | +58.5% | +46.2% | −25.9% | +15.3% | −9.7% | +10.6% | +36.7% | −16.2% | −7.0% | +19.3% | +5.1% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 3 of 14 | +16.0% | +11.3% | −6.3% | +87.4% | +57.6% | −36.2% | +7.2% | −15.1% | −3.8% | +19.9% | −12.8% | −6.0% | +20.1% | +4.7% |
Risk and diversification
How MPC has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were MPC's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents MPC's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2011, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: MPC began trading on June 23, 2011, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of MPC's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: MPC fell 44.8% from April 2024 to April 2025, while the S&P 500 slipped only 3.0%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 23 months, after MPC fell 79.7% from October 2018 to March 2020.
Green means MPC fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | MPC fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Late-2018 sell-off | −79.7% | −21.2% | Oct 2018 | Mar 2020 | 17 months | Feb 2022 | 23 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −48.2% | −11.5% | Dec 2015 | Feb 2016 | 2 months | Aug 2017 | 18 months |
| No named crash | −44.8% | −3.0% | Apr 2024 | Apr 2025 | 12 months | Mar 2026 | 11 months |
| 2011 euro debt crisis | −39.5% | −11.7% | Aug 2011 | Sep 2011 | 1 month | Feb 2012 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −31.2% | +7.4% | Mar 2013 | Oct 2013 | 7 months | Dec 2013 | 2 months |
How did MPC do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far MPC, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: MPC began trading on June 23, 2011, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- MPC fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the seven crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when MPC fell 72.4% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
- Among its popular alternatives, CVX held up best, falling less than MPC in all seven crashes they both traded through.
- MPC began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but seven of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was XOM's 33.7%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than MPC.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPC This pageMarathon Petroleum Corporation | — | −3.7% | −30.2% | −72.4% | −36.7% | −6.9% | −48.2% | −39.5% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 7 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 3 of 7 | −3.5% | −31.9% | −61.3% | −42.0% | −6.9% | −24.2% | −35.6% | −4.3% | −80.7% | −54.1% |
| CVI CVR Energy, Inc. | 5 of 7 | −10.2% | −34.8% | −55.0% | −27.7% | −4.8% | −45.9% | −31.9% | −2.5% | — | — |
| CLMT Calumet Inc. | 2 of 7 | −7.0% | −48.5% | −77.7% | −69.6% | −4.3% | −52.2% | −30.9% | 0.0% | −84.4% | — |
| PBF PBF Energy Inc. | 1 of 6 | −9.2% | −39.6% | −78.8% | −44.0% | −6.5% | −34.0% | — | — | — | — |
| DINO HF Sinclair Corporation | 6 of 7 | −7.2% | −26.0% | −56.6% | −34.1% | −4.5% | −43.6% | −32.6% | −2.5% | −83.0% | −40.3% |
| DK Delek US Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 7 | −8.9% | −35.8% | −68.1% | −33.6% | −6.2% | −63.6% | −37.0% | −2.0% | −84.7% | — |
| DKL Delek Logistics Partners, LP | 5 of 6 | 0.0% | −24.6% | −81.4% | −18.3% | −2.4% | −39.9% | — | — | — | — |
| PARR Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −7.5% | −33.1% | −70.3% | −32.7% | −0.8% | −22.7% | — | — | — | — |
| PSX Phillips 66 | 4 of 6 | −5.6% | −32.0% | −53.3% | −33.2% | −4.7% | −21.1% | — | — | — | — |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | 5 of 6 | −1.2% | −18.4% | −64.6% | −17.9% | −4.5% | −66.8% | — | — | — | — |
| DAR Darling Ingredients Inc. | 5 of 7 | −7.6% | −34.8% | −51.0% | −18.8% | −5.6% | −43.0% | −36.4% | −4.9% | −83.0% | −85.7% |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 7 of 7 | −2.6% | −24.9% | −51.0% | −19.6% | −5.3% | −18.5% | −17.2% | −0.1% | −43.8% | −29.5% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 6 of 7 | −3.1% | −20.5% | −47.9% | −23.6% | −10.0% | −15.0% | −19.6% | −0.3% | −33.7% | −33.6% |
How closely does MPC move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares MPC with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, MPC captured 138% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 95% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.29. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only CLMT had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than MPC's 1.45, out of 13 popular alternatives with the same record.
- CLMT took just 81% of the S&P 500's losses, against 95% for MPC, while still keeping 127% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than MPC's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPC This pageMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 138% | 95% | 1.45 | 1.29 |
| CLMT Calumet Inc. | 127% | 81% | 1.56 | 1.67 |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 142% | 114% | 1.24 | 1.31 |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | 87% | 76% | 1.14 | 1.16 |
| CVI CVR Energy, Inc. | 169% | 150% | 1.12 | 1.37 |
| DINO HF Sinclair Corporation | 135% | 140% | 0.97 | 1.21 |
| DK Delek US Holdings, Inc. | 130% | 136% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| PSX Phillips 66 | 116% | 122% | 0.95 | 1.16 |
| PARR Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. | 142% | 150% | 0.94 | 1.64 |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 78% | 83% | 0.94 | 0.76 |
| DAR Darling Ingredients Inc. | 118% | 127% | 0.92 | 1.05 |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 86% | 94% | 0.91 | 0.89 |
| DKL Delek Logistics Partners, LP | 131% | 146% | 0.90 | 1.67 |
| PBF PBF Energy Inc. | 137% | 164% | 0.83 | 1.44 |
What diversifies MPC?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with MPC's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing MPC with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in MPC into SMH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+48.2% for MPC alone, +48.2% for the mix).
- FIX made money in three of the three calendar years in which MPC lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of MPC over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which MPC lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% MPC and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2020 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | −27.4% | −8.2% | 32.4% | +48.2% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.41 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | −9.0% | −5.2% | 26.7% | +42.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.23 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +3.9% | −19.8% | 26.6% | +44.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.48 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | −13.4% | −8.7% | 27.4% | +41.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.07 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | +55.5% | −9.1% | 27.3% | +48.2% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.30 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | +2.1% | −9.5% | 26.7% | +41.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.01 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | +24.8% | −1.9% | 26.1% | +43.2% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.16 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | +28.2% | −0.9% | 26.9% | +43.8% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.40 | +99.4% | 0.93 | +7.2% | — | — | 27.3% | +42.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2020 | 2018 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation (this page) | 1.00 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | −27.4% | −8.2% | 32.4% | +48.2% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.18 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +10.1% | −24.5% | 27.4% | +47.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.16 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | −2.4% | −16.3% | 30.1% | +63.2% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.14 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +6.7% | +0.8% | 28.6% | +58.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.30 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +27.1% | −28.4% | 27.8% | +46.7% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.20 | +594% | 1.36 | +103% | −7.2% | −37.5% | 28.1% | +50.3% |
Common questions
What was MPC's worst drawdown?
MPC's deepest decline since it began trading in 2011 was 79.7%, from October 2018 to March 2020. It took 23 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because MPC launched in June 2011, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or the 2010 flash crash.
What were MPC's best and worst years?
Over 14 full calendar years, MPC's best year was 2012, when it returned 94.3%. Its worst was 2020, with a return of -27.4%.
Is there a better investment than MPC?
Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MPC with less volatility over the past 5 years.
Is MPC more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. MPC's volatility over the past 5 years was 33.4%, about twice the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MPC's return lands within 33.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is MPC's Sharpe ratio?
MPC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.41, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MPC earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is MPC with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, MPC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.26 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MPC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MPC holding.
What are the best alternatives to MPC?
None of the 13 popular alternatives we compared outperformed MPC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about MPC's strength than about its alternatives.
Did MPC outperform the S&P 500?
MPC finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in eight of 14 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +19.2%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did MPC do in stock market crashes?
MPC fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the seven major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when MPC fell 72.4% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies MPC?
These had a low correlation with MPC over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.41), DXJ (correlation 0.23) and EMLP (correlation 0.48); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.18), CLS (correlation 0.16) and FIX (correlation 0.14). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than MPC's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of MPC's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.