Relative Intelligence · Internet Services

How Alphabet (GOOG) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on GOOG alone. It places GOOG (Alphabet Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where GOOG stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: GOOG's full trading record, from August 2004 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowGOOG has trailed the market, rising 0.4% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 6 months, MSFT (Microsoft) rose 27.7% and NFLX (Netflix) fell 27.6%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?GOOG fell 4.2% over the past 3 months, 4.0 points behind the internet services ETF XLC (State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF), which fell 0.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its internet services peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: MSFT (Microsoft) rose 32.5%, while BIDU (Baidu) fell 26.7%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, GOOG rose 31.2% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (148% against 89.3%). GOOG finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termGOOG turned $10,000 into $85,200 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. GOOG's 10-year return of 752% puts it ahead of 92% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 35.0% off GOOG, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than MSFT (Microsoft, 31.0%) but less than AMZN (Amazon.com, 39.6%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationGOOG is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.59 with the total US market, more closely than 91% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- NVDA (NVIDIA) was ahead of GOOG in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (51.9% volatility against 32.0%).
- Nearby categories and themes
- MSGS (Madison Square Garden Sports, entertainment) matched GOOG's return over the past 5 years (18.4% a year against 19.0%) with 20% less volatility.
- Whole market
- 73 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than GOOG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT (Walmart), XOM (Exxonmobil) and ABBV (AbbVie).
How much would $10,000 in GOOG have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in GOOG over the past 22 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of GOOG over the same span and GOOG's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: GOOG began trading on August 19, 2004, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust. It covers the most recent 22 years of GOOG's record, starting at the end of September 2004.
- $10,000 invested in GOOG at the end of September 2004 would have grown to $1,064,820 by September 2026, more than the $102,174 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of GOOG, and NVDA finished highest, at $20,721,476.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2004 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 18 of the 1,487 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of GOOG; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$21M+207,115% total · +41.5% a year
- AAPL$6M+57,365% total · +33.5% a year
- NFLX$3M+31,483% total · +29.9% a year
- TSM$1M+13,047% total · +24.8% a year
- AMZN$1M+12,113% total · +24.4% a year
- GOOG$1M+10,548% total · +23.6% a year
- CRM$597,836+5,878% total · +20.4% a year
- MSFT$302,092+2,921% total · +16.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$102,174+922% total · +11.1% a year
- DIS$58,930+489% total · +8.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 470 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of GOOG; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- PANW$49,770+398% total · +37.8% a year
- TKO$34,410+244% total · +28.0% a year
- FTNT$30,603+206% total · +25.1% a year
- SNX$26,309+163% total · +21.3% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- AAPL$24,129+141% total · +19.3% a year
- SPOT$21,629+116% total · +16.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
GOOG at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: GOOG began trading on August 19, 2004, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust.
- GOOG's deepest decline since it began trading in 2004 was 65.3%, from November 2007 to November 2008. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 21 full calendar years, GOOG's best was 2005, when it returned 115%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 55.5%. It lost money in five of those years.
- GOOG is 15.6% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $4.1T
- Industry
- Internet Content & Information
- Price history from
- August 2004
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +31.2%total return
- Past 3 years
- +148%+35.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- +138%+19.0% a year
- Past 10 years
- +752%+23.9% a year
- Best calendar year
- +115%2005
- Worst calendar year
- −55.5%2008
- Losing years
- 5 of 21full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 32.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.71return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −65.3%Nov 2007 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −15.6%below the peak
GOOG against the whole market
Where GOOG ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does GOOG rank among all stocks?
This section ranks GOOG on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how GOOG stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- GOOG's 10-year return ranks in the top 8% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | GOOG | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +31.2% | 939 of 3,287 | top 29% |
| 3-year return | +148% | 611 of 3,017 | top 20% |
| 5-year return | +138% | 492 of 2,893 | top 17% |
| 10-year return | +752% | 172 of 2,202 | top 8% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 32.0% | 907 of 2,893 | top 31% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.71 | 449 of 2,893 | top 16% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −44.6% | 279 of 2,187 | top 13% |
What has beaten GOOG on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). GOOG sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than GOOG with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 57 stocks and 16 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than GOOG over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 2% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half GOOG's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 23% less than GOOG's 32.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.71 for GOOG.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to GOOG; faint dots are 62 more of the 73 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× GOOG's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than GOOG?
Investments that beat GOOG over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among GOOG's popular alternatives, NVDA was ahead of GOOG in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (51.9% volatility against 32.0%).
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSGS (entertainment) matched GOOG's return over the past 5 years (18.4% a year against 19.0%) with 20% less volatility.
- Across the whole market, 73 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than GOOG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT, XOM and ABBV.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat GOOG over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks GOOG's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than GOOG follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than GOOG's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× GOOG's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than GOOG's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with GOOG?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.60 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against GOOG. 1 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +58.0% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | +13,019% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 5 shownEverything else in Internet Services and the categories next to it (Entertainment, E-Commerce, Software, Application Software), plus GOOG's specific themes. 5 of 114 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.12 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +2,626% | 0.02 | — | ||
SNXTD Synnex Corp · Technology Distribution · Cloud Computing theme | Higher return in most periods | +20.3% | 30.4% | 0.76 | −55.8% | +430% | 0.54 | — | |
TKOTKO Group Holdings, Inc. · Entertainment | Higher return, similar volatility | +26.3% | 32.7% | 0.88 | −69.1% | +941% | 0.15 | — | |
MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Similar return, lower volatility | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.11 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 231 of 3,500 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | -0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.13 | — | ||
EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.54 | 0.59% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | -0.08 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.19 | — | |
FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.54 | 0.19% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.50 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.08 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for GOOG
- Annual return
- GOOG returned 19.0% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $23,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- GOOG's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.0%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, GOOG's return lands within 32.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- GOOG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.71, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so GOOG earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- GOOG's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 44.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 44.6% fall takes a 80.5% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, GOOG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against GOOG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a GOOG holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 73 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than GOOG with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 67 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with GOOG | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | -0.22 | — | |
| 2 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.54 | 0.59% |
| 3 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | -0.08 | — | |
| 4 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.19 | — |
| 5 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.54 | 0.19% |
| 6 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.62 | 0.40% |
| 7 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.32 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.11 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.28 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.27 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.10 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.32 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | -0.05 | — | |
| 14 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.35 | 0.48% |
| 15 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.34 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.29 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.05 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | -0.13 | — | |
| 19 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.21 | — |
| 20 | USFDUS Foods Holding Corp. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +22.7% | 29.8% | 0.84 | −77.3% | +347% | 0.13 | — |
| 21 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.14 | — | |
| 22 | IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +470% | 0.30 | — |
| 23 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.24 | — |
| 24 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.22 | — |
| 25 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.06 | — |
| 26 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.33 | 0.59% |
| 27 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.06 | — | |
| 28 | FBIZFirst Business Financial Services, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +23.1% | 29.4% | 0.85 | −50.2% | +307% | -0.03 | — |
| 29 | BWFGBankwell Financial Group, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +20.1% | 28.5% | 0.79 | −64.7% | +240% | 0.06 | — |
| 30 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | -0.14 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | -0.06 | — | |
| 32 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.47 | 0.45% |
| 33 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | -0.12 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | -0.07 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.19 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | -0.07 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.06 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.28 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.42 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.08 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.07 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.30 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | -0.17 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | -0.02 | 0.08% | |
| 45 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.08 | — |
| 46 | ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 24.5% | 0.87 | −53.8% | +309% | -0.14 | — |
| 47 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.09 | 0.80% |
| 48 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.16 | — |
| 49 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.23 | — |
| 50 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.39 | — |
| 51 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.02 | — |
| 52 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.15 | — |
| 53 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Whole market | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +180% | 0.12 | — |
| 54 | HUBBHubbell Incorporated · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +21.0% | 30.0% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +442% | 0.15 | — |
| 55 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | -0.10 | — |
| 56 | WESWestern Midstream Partners, LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +23.5% | 27.6% | 0.91 | −91.9% | +128% | 0.14 | — |
| 57 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Whole market | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.23 | — |
| 58 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | 0.15 | — |
| 59 | RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 27.8% | 0.80 | −40.7% | +215% | -0.16 | — |
| 60 | ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings, Inc. · Auto Parts | Whole market | +27.3% | 29.9% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +367% | 0.16 | — |
| 61 | AMAntero Midstream Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +20.0% | 25.9% | 0.84 | −92.9% | — | -0.01 | — |
| 62 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.03 | — |
| 63 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | -0.02 | — |
| 64 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.19 | — |
| 65 | IYEiShares U.S. Energy ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.1% | 25.2% | 0.89 | −68.6% | +159% | 0.00 | 0.37% |
| 66 | DMLPDorchester Minerals, L.P. · Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Whole market | +21.1% | 29.1% | 0.81 | −56.8% | +435% | 0.00 | — |
| 67 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.09 | 0.95% |
See everything that outperformed GOOG →
GOOG against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against GOOG, compared period by period and year by year.
How do GOOG's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at GOOG, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 19 popular alternatives earned more than GOOG over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 15 of the 19 popular alternatives earned less than GOOG over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, GOOG returned 19.0% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (32.0% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than GOOG with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| GOOG This pageAlphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | +18.4% | 28.0% |
| SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | +15.9% | 47.8% |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | +15.5% | 45.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | +7.7% | 44.3% |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | +1.9% | 43.8% |
| TME Tencent Music Entertainment Group | +1.0% | 58.7% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | −3.2% | 39.4% |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | −7.5% | 29.5% |
| YELP Yelp Inc. | −12.4% | 37.6% |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | −15.0% | 51.9% |
| PINS Pinterest, Inc. | −18.2% | 55.6% |
| Z Zillow Group, Inc. Class C | −18.3% | 52.8% |
| WB Weibo Corporation | −29.1% | 50.2% |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | −29.9% | 77.4% |
| TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | −30.8% | 67.7% |
| SNAP Snap Inc. | −39.0% | 76.2% |
Has GOOG consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares GOOG with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than GOOG helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 20 popular alternatives, NVDA, outperformed GOOG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- AAPL earned more for the risk it took than GOOG (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than GOOG over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. (this page) | — | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | +752% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| NVDA QualifiedNVIDIA Corporation | 3/5 short3/3 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| AAPL Consumer ElectronicsApple Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +0.2% | +4.0% | +24.6% | +25.6% | +29.9% | +99.0% | +133% | +1,168% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | — | $5.0T | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 4/5 short1/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| SPOT Internet Content & InformationSpotify Technology S.A. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +1.8% | +6.9% | −2.0% | −8.5% | −22.1% | +251% | +109% | — | 47.8% | 0.55 | −80.5% | — | $108B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| CRM Software - ApplicationSalesforce, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +2.5% | +39.7% | +30.7% | −3.8% | −3.9% | +21.3% | −14.8% | +240% | 39.4% | 0.12 | −58.7% | — | $200B | — |
| DIS EntertainmentThe Walt Disney Company | 3/5 short0/3 long | +7.1% | +15.8% | +5.8% | +0.6% | +1.2% | +39.3% | −32.5% | +31.7% | 29.5% | -0.12 | −60.7% | — | $193B | — |
| PINS Internet Content & InformationPinterest, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +18.7% | +0.7% | +11.3% | −13.5% | −30.2% | −11.5% | −63.3% | — | 55.6% | -0.08 | −82.7% | — | $13B | — |
| SNAP Internet Content & InformationSnap Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +11.9% | +39.9% | +6.3% | −21.5% | −17.5% | −32.4% | −91.6% | — | 76.2% | -0.26 | −95.3% | — | $11B | — |
| META Internet Content & InformationMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −6.3% | +7.6% | +3.7% | +7.0% | −4.9% | +127% | +106% | +439% | 45.4% | 0.55 | −76.7% | — | $1.8T | — |
| Z Internet Content & InformationZillow Group, Inc. Class C | 2/5 short0/3 long | +5.2% | −2.4% | −31.8% | −51.1% | −56.8% | −17.2% | −63.6% | −3.8% | 52.8% | -0.12 | −86.5% | — | $7.3B | — |
| NFLX EntertainmentNetflix, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −6.4% | +1.6% | −27.6% | −24.5% | −44.5% | +71.3% | +9.9% | +457% | 43.8% | 0.27 | −75.9% | — | $286B | — |
| ORCL Software - InfrastructureOracle Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −11.4% | +8.4% | −25.6% | −32.1% | −52.1% | +33.3% | +45.1% | +300% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $396B | — |
| YELP Internet Content & InformationYelp Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +4.5% | −23.0% | −28.0% | −32.8% | −38.3% | −51.9% | −48.5% | −41.0% | 37.6% | -0.17 | −72.2% | — | $1.1B | — |
| WB Internet Content & InformationWeibo Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.0% | −18.3% | −25.5% | −33.7% | −38.4% | −25.4% | −82.0% | −82.5% | 50.2% | -0.44 | −94.0% | — | $1.6B | — |
| RDDT Internet Content & InformationReddit, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.9% | −14.3% | −6.3% | −35.6% | −23.1% | — | — | — | — | — | −61.4% | — | $30B | — |
| TME Internet Content & InformationTencent Music Entertainment Group | 1/5 short0/3 long | +4.9% | −6.5% | −15.2% | −50.8% | −61.3% | +35.2% | +4.9% | — | 58.7% | 0.30 | −90.2% | — | $13B | — |
| TTD Advertising AgenciesThe Trade Desk, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.9% | −32.1% | −47.4% | −66.4% | −75.9% | −82.9% | −84.1% | +377% | 67.7% | -0.20 | −91.5% | — | $6.0B | — |
| BIDU Internet Content & InformationBaidu, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.7% | −26.7% | −37.0% | −46.4% | −34.1% | −24.4% | −55.5% | −54.0% | 51.9% | -0.06 | −77.5% | — | $27B | — |
| BILI Internet Content & InformationBilibili Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.3% | −24.4% | −44.3% | −47.2% | −49.5% | +11.3% | −83.1% | — | 77.4% | -0.09 | −94.3% | — | $5.9B | — |
How did GOOG do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2005, along with where GOOG ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with GOOG and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: GOOG began trading on August 19, 2004, so the table starts with 2005, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust.
- GOOG finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 21 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, GOOG finished in the top quarter in five of 21 years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 1 of 21.
- Among its popular alternatives, AAPL came out ahead of GOOG most often, in 13 of the 21 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of GOOG; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places GOOG among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of GOOG | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG This pageAlphabet Inc. | — | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% | +29.1% | −1.0% | +35.6% | +1.7% | +44.5% | −6.0% | +58.5% | +9.5% | +8.8% | −4.2% | +101% | −55.5% | +50.2% | +11.1% | +115% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 21 | 1 of 21 | 9 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 9 of 20 | 2 of 20 | 16 of 20 | 10 of 19 | 7 of 16 | 11 of 15 | 11 of 14 | 4 of 13 | 9 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 7 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 5 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 3 of 9 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 21 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 11 of 21 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% | −11.0% | −10.0% | −17.6% | +131% | −76.3% | +37.9% | +102% | +55.2% |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 13 of 21 | +9.0% | +30.7% | +49.0% | −26.4% | +34.6% | +82.3% | +89.0% | −5.4% | +48.5% | +12.5% | −3.0% | +40.6% | +8.0% | +32.6% | +25.5% | +53.2% | +147% | −56.9% | +133% | +18.1% | +123% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 9 of 21 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% | +5.8% | −4.5% | −6.5% | +60.5% | −44.4% | +20.8% | +15.8% | −1.0% |
| SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | 4 of 7 | +29.8% | +138% | +138% | −66.3% | −25.6% | +110% | +31.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 12 of 21 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 11 of 21 | −20.2% | +27.8% | +98.5% | −47.8% | +14.2% | +36.8% | +18.7% | +34.0% | +49.3% | −12.7% | +32.2% | +7.5% | +31.3% | +65.8% | −23.2% | +79.0% | +130% | −49.0% | +72.0% | +13.7% | +88.9% |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | 7 of 21 | +3.3% | +24.4% | +4.3% | −43.9% | −14.5% | +25.3% | +33.5% | +3.6% | +4.8% | +0.7% | +12.9% | +24.9% | +55.3% | +34.8% | +1.6% | +17.6% | +43.8% | −28.7% | −4.6% | +44.3% | −12.9% |
| PINS Pinterest, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −10.7% | −21.7% | +52.5% | −33.2% | −44.8% | +254% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SNAP Snap Inc. | 3 of 8 | −25.1% | −36.4% | +89.2% | −81.0% | −6.1% | +207% | +196% | −62.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 8 of 13 | +13.1% | +66.0% | +194% | −64.2% | +23.1% | +33.1% | +56.6% | −25.7% | +53.4% | +9.9% | +34.2% | +42.8% | +105% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Z Zillow Group, Inc. Class C | 4 of 10 | −7.9% | +28.0% | +79.6% | −49.5% | −50.8% | +183% | +45.5% | −22.8% | +12.2% | +55.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 12 of 21 | +5.2% | +83.0% | +65.1% | −51.0% | +11.4% | +67.1% | +20.9% | +39.4% | +55.1% | +8.2% | +134% | −7.2% | +298% | +33.4% | −60.6% | +219% | +84.3% | +12.3% | +2.9% | −4.4% | +119% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 8 of 21 | +18.1% | +60.0% | +30.9% | −4.7% | +36.9% | +24.3% | +19.4% | −3.0% | +24.9% | +6.9% | −17.6% | +19.0% | +15.7% | +31.8% | −17.5% | +28.6% | +39.4% | −21.4% | +31.7% | +40.4% | −11.0% |
| YELP Yelp Inc. | 4 of 13 | −21.5% | −18.3% | +73.2% | −24.6% | +10.9% | −6.2% | −0.5% | −16.6% | +10.0% | +32.4% | −47.4% | −20.6% | +266% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WB Weibo Corporation | 2 of 11 | +19.5% | −4.0% | −39.1% | −38.3% | −24.4% | −11.6% | −20.7% | −43.5% | +155% | +108% | +36.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RDDT Reddit, Inc. | 0 of 1 | +40.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TME Tencent Music Entertainment Group | 2 of 7 | +56.4% | +27.2% | +8.7% | +21.0% | −64.4% | +63.8% | −11.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −67.7% | +63.3% | +60.5% | −51.1% | +14.4% | +208% | +124% | +154% | +65.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | 10 of 20 | +55.0% | −29.2% | +4.1% | −23.1% | −31.2% | +71.1% | −20.3% | −32.3% | +42.4% | −13.0% | −17.1% | +28.2% | +77.4% | −13.9% | +20.7% | +135% | +215% | −66.5% | +246% | +79.2% | — |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 2 of 7 | +35.8% | +48.8% | −48.6% | −48.9% | −45.9% | +360% | +27.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How GOOG has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were GOOG's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents GOOG's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2004, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: GOOG began trading on August 19, 2004, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In four of GOOG's five worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: GOOG fell 28.5% from January to March 2006, while the S&P 500 slipped only 0.4%.
- The slowest recovery came after GOOG fell 65.3% from November 2007 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until September 2012, four years later.
Green means GOOG fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | GOOG fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −65.3% | −42.9% | Nov 2007 | Nov 2008 | 12 months | Sep 2012 | 3.8 years |
| 2022 bear market | −44.6% | −19.8% | Nov 2021 | Nov 2022 | 12 months | Jan 2024 | 14 months |
| Covid crash | −30.8% | −33.7% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jul 2020 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −29.3% | −17.3% | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 | 2 months | Aug 2025 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −28.5% | −0.4% | Jan 2006 | Mar 2006 | 2 months | Oct 2006 | 7 months |
How did GOOG do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far GOOG, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: GOOG began trading on August 19, 2004, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, MSFT held up best, falling less than GOOG in seven of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- GOOG began trading after the dot-com bust, but six of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was MSFT's 62.9%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
- GOOG fell further than the S&P 500 in four of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when GOOG fell 35.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than GOOG.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG This pageAlphabet Inc. | — | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 4 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 1 of 9 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 5 of 9 | −2.9% | −27.4% | −30.7% | −36.5% | −4.8% | −23.4% | −12.5% | −4.3% | −60.9% | −81.2% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 7 of 9 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | 1 of 4 | −4.2% | −65.7% | −20.6% | −42.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −5.3% | −42.7% | −35.7% | −24.8% | −6.1% | −34.2% | −26.9% | −4.2% | −70.5% | — |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | 3 of 9 | −6.8% | −41.8% | −39.3% | −14.9% | −6.8% | −25.5% | −28.7% | −1.8% | −54.9% | −67.6% |
| PINS Pinterest, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −8.0% | −50.1% | −53.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SNAP Snap Inc. | 1 of 5 | −7.4% | −78.3% | −51.3% | −45.4% | −9.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −2.9% | −62.1% | −32.9% | −26.5% | −9.8% | −13.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Z Zillow Group, Inc. Class C | 1 of 6 | −6.4% | −57.0% | −61.5% | −38.6% | −2.7% | −78.6% | — | — | — | — |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −6.1% | −71.9% | −22.6% | −38.7% | −6.7% | −36.8% | −59.7% | −6.5% | −55.9% | — |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 5 of 9 | −5.0% | −31.0% | −28.3% | −17.2% | −6.6% | −16.1% | −23.9% | −2.1% | −41.1% | −84.2% |
| YELP Yelp Inc. | 1 of 6 | −4.9% | −27.3% | −58.3% | −39.1% | −14.8% | −51.5% | — | — | — | — |
| WB Weibo Corporation | 1 of 6 | −5.3% | −60.7% | −30.6% | −29.7% | −8.0% | −39.7% | — | — | — | — |
| TME Tencent Music Entertainment Group | 2 of 3 | −2.3% | −57.4% | −26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | 1 of 5 | −8.4% | −51.7% | −54.2% | −33.0% | −8.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −7.5% | −36.6% | −38.4% | −31.8% | −9.0% | −35.5% | −36.0% | −4.3% | −74.9% | — |
| BILI Bilibili Inc. | 2 of 4 | −8.0% | −70.2% | −28.2% | −17.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does GOOG move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares GOOG with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, GOOG captured 132% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 110% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.12. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Only NVDA, AAPL and MSFT had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than GOOG's 1.20, out of 14 popular alternatives with the same record.
- MSFT took just 91% of the S&P 500's losses, against 110% for GOOG, while still keeping 127% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than GOOG's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG This pageAlphabet Inc. | 132% | 110% | 1.20 | 1.12 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 137% | 94% | 1.46 | 1.15 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 122% | 105% | 1.16 | 1.18 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 134% | 143% | 0.94 | 1.25 |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 131% | 159% | 0.82 | 1.30 |
| TTD The Trade Desk, Inc. | 140% | 173% | 0.81 | 1.75 |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 115% | 143% | 0.80 | 1.16 |
| DIS The Walt Disney Company | 90% | 162% | 0.56 | 1.32 |
| Z Zillow Group, Inc. Class C | 124% | 251% | 0.49 | 1.65 |
| BIDU Baidu, Inc. | 56% | 159% | 0.35 | 0.79 |
| YELP Yelp Inc. | 52% | 156% | 0.33 | 1.14 |
| WB Weibo Corporation | 15% | 144% | 0.10 | 0.63 |
What diversifies GOOG?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with GOOG's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing GOOG with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in GOOG into CAH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+20.9% for GOOG alone, +25.7% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of GOOG over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.35 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- CAH made money in three of the five calendar years in which GOOG lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which GOOG lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% GOOG and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2014 | 2010 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +138% | 0.71 | −38.7% | −1.0% | −6.0% | −4.2% | −55.5% | 31.1% | +20.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.21 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | 25.3% | +20.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.35 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +8.1% | −1.8% | −20.8% | 25.8% | +22.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.20 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −8.7% | +23.8% | — | — | 25.6% | +20.6% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.14 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −3.0% | +12.6% | — | — | 25.4% | +20.0% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.44 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | −9.5% | +3.4% | — | — | 25.9% | +20.1% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.25 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −2.2% | +29.3% | +4.9% | 25.9% | +21.3% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.44 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | −0.9% | — | — | — | 26.9% | +21.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.02 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −8.7% | +21.9% | −39.0% | 25.3% | +22.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2014 | 2010 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +138% | 0.71 | −38.7% | −1.0% | −6.0% | −4.2% | −55.5% | 31.1% | +20.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | -0.08 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +23.0% | +21.4% | −39.6% | 25.0% | +25.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.35 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | −10.4% | +8.7% | −15.2% | 29.2% | +34.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.05 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | +29.3% | +13.8% | −40.4% | 25.1% | +25.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | -0.01 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +0.4% | — | — | 25.6% | +27.9% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.10 | +594% | 1.36 | +24.2% | −37.5% | +50.9% | −2.8% | −67.4% | 26.4% | +27.9% |
Common questions
What was GOOG's worst drawdown?
GOOG's deepest decline since it began trading in 2004 was 65.3%, from November 2007 to November 2008. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high. Because GOOG launched in August 2004, that record does not include the dot-com bust.
What were GOOG's best and worst years?
Over 21 full calendar years, GOOG's best year was 2005, when it returned 115%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -55.5%.
Is there a better investment than GOOG?
Among GOOG's popular alternatives, NVDA was ahead of GOOG in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (51.9% volatility against 32.0%). Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MSGS (entertainment) matched GOOG's return over the past 5 years (18.4% a year against 19.0%) with 20% less volatility.
Is GOOG more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. GOOG's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.0%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, GOOG's return lands within 32.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is GOOG's Sharpe ratio?
GOOG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.71, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so GOOG earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is GOOG with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, GOOG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against GOOG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a GOOG holding.
What are the best alternatives to GOOG?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed GOOG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: NVDA.
Did GOOG outperform the S&P 500?
GOOG finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 21 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +65.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did GOOG do in stock market crashes?
GOOG fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in four. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when GOOG fell 35.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies GOOG?
These had a low correlation with GOOG over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.21), DXJ (correlation 0.35) and EMLP (correlation 0.20); among large stocks, CAH (correlation -0.08), FIX (correlation 0.35) and MCK (correlation -0.05). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than GOOG's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of GOOG's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to GOOG
NVDANVIDIA
AAPLApple
MSFTMicrosoft
SPOTSpotify Technology
AMZNAmazon.com
CRMSalesforce
DISWalt Disney
METAMeta Platforms
NFLXNetflix
ORCLOracle