Relative Intelligence · Cybersecurity

How Fortinet (FTNT) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on FTNT alone. It places FTNT (Fortinet, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where FTNT stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: FTNT's full trading record, from November 2009 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, FTNT rose 107% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its cybersecurity peers were far apart over the past 6 months, from OKTA (up 156%) to CSCO (Cisco Systems, up 22.6%). Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?Not a move of its own: the cybersecurity ETF CIBR (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF) rose 9.4% over the past 3 months, with CRWD (CrowdStrike, up 14.5%) and NET (Cloudflare, up 7.0%), against 3.9% for the S&P 500. Its cybersecurity peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: ZS (Zscaler) rose 43.2%, while CSCO (Cisco Systems) fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsFTNT has run far ahead of the market, rising 101% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (203% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termFTNT turned $10,000 into $273,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. FTNT's 10-year return of 2,626% puts it ahead of 99% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross five sell-offs, FTNT has typically fallen 1.8 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 10 years, FTNT's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.09: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.6 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 92% as much. FTNT is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.36 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.37 with the total US market, less closely than 57% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise) earned more than FTNT with less volatility over the past 5 years: 32.9% a year at 42.2% volatility, against 20.7% a year at 44.8%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, semiconductors) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF, semiconductors) earned more than FTNT with less volatility over the past 5 years. TSM returned 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 20.7% a year at 44.8%.
- Whole market
- 179 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than FTNT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) and XOM (Exxonmobil).
How much would $10,000 in FTNT have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in FTNT over the past 14 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of FTNT over the same span and FTNT's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: The chart covers the past 14 years rather than FTNT's full 16 years, because most of its popular alternatives have not traded that long.
- $10,000 invested in FTNT at the end of September 2012 would have grown to $370,856 by September 2026, more than the $67,346 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of FTNT, and AVGO finished highest, at $1,377,337.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2012 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 32 of the 2,213 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of FTNT; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AVGO$1M+13,673% total · +42.2% a year
- KLAC$674,517+6,645% total · +35.1% a year
- SMH$453,446+4,434% total · +31.3% a year
- PANW$387,235+3,772% total · +29.8% a year
- TSM$380,802+3,708% total · +29.7% a year
- FTNT$370,856+3,609% total · +29.4% a year
- MSFT$217,246+2,072% total · +24.6% a year
- QLYS$132,202+1,222% total · +20.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$67,346+573% total · +14.6% a year
- FFIV$42,542+325% total · +10.9% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 339 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of FTNT; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ANET$94,783+848% total · +56.8% a year
- AVGO$79,117+691% total · +51.2% a year
- ASX$70,798+608% total · +47.9% a year
- HPE$51,318+413% total · +38.7% a year
- PANW$49,770+398% total · +37.8% a year
- CRWD$43,090+331% total · +33.9% a year
- NET$30,828+208% total · +25.3% a year
- FTNT$30,603+206% total · +25.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- OKTA$8,811−11.9% total · −2.5% a year
FTNT at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: FTNT began trading on November 18, 2009, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust or the 2008 financial crisis.
- FTNT's deepest decline since it began trading in 2009 was 51.2%, from August 2015 to February 2016. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 16 full calendar years, FTNT's best was 2021, when it returned 142%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 32.0%. It lost money in five of those years.
- FTNT is 12.2% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $125B
- Industry
- Software - Infrastructure
- Price history from
- November 2009
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +101%total return
- Past 3 years
- +203%+44.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +156%+20.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +2,626%+39.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +142%2021
- Worst calendar year
- −32.0%2022
- Losing years
- 5 of 16full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 44.8%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.65return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −51.2%Aug 2015 to Feb 2016
- From its all-time high
- −12.2%below the peak
FTNT against the whole market
Where FTNT ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does FTNT rank among all stocks?
This section ranks FTNT on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how FTNT stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- FTNT's 10-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | FTNT | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +101% | 170 of 3,287 | top 5% |
| 3-year return | +203% | 395 of 3,017 | top 13% |
| 5-year return | +156% | 431 of 2,893 | top 15% |
| 10-year return | +2,626% | 26 of 2,202 | top 1% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 44.8% | 1,684 of 2,893 | bottom 43% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.65 | 564 of 2,893 | top 19% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −38.3% | 113 of 2,187 | top 5% |
What has beaten FTNT on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). FTNT sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than FTNT with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 161 stocks and 18 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than FTNT over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 5% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half FTNT's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 45% less than FTNT's 44.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.65 for FTNT. INSW earned the most, 56.5% a year, while still swinging less than FTNT (40.5% against 44.8%).
- Among FTNT's popular alternatives, HPE is in the region. HPE earned 32.9% a year against 20.7% a year for FTNT, at 42.2% volatility, 6% less than FTNT's 44.8%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to FTNT; faint dots are 91 more of the 179 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than FTNT?
Investments that beat FTNT over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among FTNT's popular alternatives, HPE earned more than FTNT with less volatility over the past 5 years: 32.9% a year at 42.2% volatility, against 20.7% a year at 44.8%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TSM (semiconductors) and SMH (semiconductors) earned more than FTNT with less volatility over the past 5 years. TSM returned 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 20.7% a year at 44.8%.
- Across the whole market, 179 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than FTNT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them TSM, LLY and XOM.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat FTNT over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks FTNT's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than FTNT follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than FTNT's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× FTNT's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than FTNT's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with FTNT?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +2,626% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.36 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 4 shownThe investments people most often weigh against FTNT. 4 of 21 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +48.3% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | +2,380% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +3,439% | 0.04 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Cybersecurity and Software and the categories next to it (Cloud Computing, Application Software, Communications Equipment, Enterprise Software, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus FTNT's specific themes. 9 of 138 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +967% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.33 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +29.5% | 65.2% | 0.72 | −61.9% | +1,874% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +57.3% | 64.5% | 1.03 | −66.9% | +1,904% | 0.05 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +38.7% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | +2,534% | 0.20 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 286 of 3,475 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.06 | — | ||
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.11 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | -0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.06 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.06 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +32.2% | 42.8% | 0.86 | −85.5% | −3.6% | -0.14 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.12 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, lower volatility | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | -0.05 | 0.08% | ||
What these numbers mean for FTNT
- Annual return
- FTNT returned 20.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $25,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- FTNT's volatility over the past 5 years was 44.8%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, FTNT's return lands within 44.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- FTNT's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.65, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so FTNT earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- FTNT's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 38.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 38.3% fall takes a 62.1% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, FTNT's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.36 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against FTNT instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a FTNT holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 179 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than FTNT with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with FTNT | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.06 | — | |
| 2 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | — | -0.11 | — |
| 3 | Whole market | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | -0.02 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.06 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.01 | — | |
| 6 | CAKEThe Cheesecake Factory Incorporated · Restaurants | Whole market | +25.8% | 39.9% | 0.78 | −75.6% | +187% | 0.29 | — |
| 7 | Popular alternative | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.47 | — | |
| 8 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.02 | — |
| 9 | Whole market | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | -0.16 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +47.3% | 32.5% | 1.36 | −68.9% | +1,028% | 0.19 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.15 | — | |
| 12 | FSSFederal Signal Corporation · Industrial Machinery | Whole market | +23.3% | 31.7% | 0.82 | −33.0% | +882% | 0.05 | — |
| 13 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.12 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.30 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | -0.11 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.17 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.00 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +36.0% | 31.0% | 1.15 | −80.9% | +139% | 0.27 | — | |
| 19 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.12 | 0.48% |
| 20 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +936% | 0.14 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | -0.06 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +50.3% | 37.5% | 1.28 | −75.3% | +674% | -0.15 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | -0.04 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.22 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | -0.03 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +332% | 0.08 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.05 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +35.4% | 35.4% | 1.04 | −55.1% | +935% | 0.40 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | -0.03 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +32.0% | 40.7% | 0.89 | −55.3% | +1,017% | 0.13 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.03 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.04 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | -0.09 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.16 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +39.3% | 37.2% | 1.08 | −45.5% | +2,045% | 0.15 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.13 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +33.1% | 32.5% | 1.05 | −73.5% | +295% | -0.10 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.07 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +26.5% | 32.5% | 0.89 | −77.5% | +433% | -0.08 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.19 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.00 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +31.4% | 42.1% | 0.86 | −51.5% | +616% | 0.12 | — | |
| 43 | Whole market | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +190% | -0.09 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.10 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.11 | — | |
| 46 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.28 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | -0.11 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +352% | -0.10 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +24.7% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | +339% | -0.02 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +34.3% | 32.0% | 1.09 | −77.1% | +430% | -0.11 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.10 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.33 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.19 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +510% | -0.03 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | -0.11 | — | |
| 56 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.24 | — |
| 57 | Whole market | +26.5% | 39.4% | 0.80 | −89.2% | +163% | -0.13 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +24.3% | 39.1% | 0.75 | −63.3% | +1,270% | 0.15 | — | |
| 59 | EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +43.0% | 35.3% | 1.20 | −48.0% | +1,202% | 0.10 | — |
| 60 | FTITechnipFMC plc · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +54.1% | 41.3% | 1.26 | −85.8% | +178% | -0.06 | — |
| 61 | Same or nearby category | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.11 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | -0.05 | 0.08% | |
| 63 | Whole market | +22.1% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −72.7% | +165% | 0.08 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +21.7% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −57.2% | +569% | 0.24 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +24.1% | 39.9% | 0.74 | −38.2% | — | 0.14 | — | |
| 66 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.30 | — |
| 67 | Whole market | +25.3% | 34.4% | 0.83 | −64.1% | +390% | -0.07 | — | |
| 68 | STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +32.2% | 38.0% | 0.93 | −68.5% | +1,018% | 0.26 | — |
| 69 | NWGNatWest Group plc · Banks | Whole market | +27.7% | 34.1% | 0.89 | −67.4% | +495% | 0.02 | — |
| 70 | JBLJabil Inc. · Electronics Manufacturing | Whole market | +35.8% | 39.6% | 0.97 | −57.3% | +1,264% | 0.29 | — |
| 71 | IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +470% | 0.18 | — |
| 72 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | -0.04 | — |
| 73 | SBSCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP · Water Utilities | Whole market | +39.1% | 37.1% | 1.08 | −62.0% | +293% | -0.05 | — |
| 74 | CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Whole market | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.07 | — |
| 75 | TSTenaris S.A. · Oilfield Services | Whole market | +24.3% | 33.3% | 0.82 | −75.1% | +181% | -0.03 | — |
| 76 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.08 | — |
| 77 | NVTnVent Electric plc · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +35.4% | 38.0% | 0.99 | −56.2% | — | 0.25 | — |
| 78 | EQTEQT Corporation · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +22.5% | 40.9% | 0.70 | −87.5% | +69.1% | -0.04 | — |
| 79 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.18 | — |
| 80 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.02 | — |
| 81 | DINOHF Sinclair Corporation · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +31.8% | 38.8% | 0.91 | −77.3% | +649% | -0.01 | — |
| 82 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.28 | — |
| 83 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Whole market | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +180% | -0.13 | — |
| 84 | RLRalph Lauren Corporation · Apparel & Footwear | Whole market | +28.6% | 36.9% | 0.87 | −55.1% | +370% | 0.26 | — |
| 85 | TPRTapestry, Inc. · Luxury Goods | Whole market | +28.1% | 40.8% | 0.82 | −78.9% | +328% | 0.26 | — |
| 86 | GDXVanEck Gold Miners ETF · Gold Mining | Whole market | +22.9% | 38.2% | 0.73 | −49.8% | +283% | -0.07 | 0.51% |
| 87 | USFDUS Foods Holding Corp. · Food Distribution | Whole market | +22.7% | 29.8% | 0.84 | −77.3% | +347% | 0.08 | — |
| 88 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | -0.03 | — |
| 89 | UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corporation · Biotechnology | Whole market | +23.6% | 35.1% | 0.78 | −55.6% | +390% | -0.04 | — |
| 90 | UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Whole market | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | 0.18 | — |
| 91 | MLIMueller Industries, Inc. · Metal Fabrication | Whole market | +38.9% | 33.4% | 1.16 | −53.0% | +800% | 0.12 | — |
| 92 | WESWestern Midstream Partners, LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +23.5% | 27.6% | 0.91 | −91.9% | +128% | 0.10 | — |
| 93 | WFWoori Financial Group Inc. · Banks | Whole market | +26.3% | 31.6% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +282% | -0.10 | — |
| 94 | MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.29 | — |
| 95 | WWDWoodward, Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +23.8% | 32.3% | 0.82 | −60.6% | +488% | 0.14 | — |
| 96 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Whole market | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.01 | — |
| 97 | APGAPi Group Corporation · Engineering & Construction | Whole market | +23.0% | 31.9% | 0.81 | −49.6% | — | 0.12 | — |
| 98 | NRGNRG Energy, Inc. · Independent Power Producers | Whole market | +21.9% | 41.8% | 0.69 | −48.8% | +933% | 0.08 | — |
| 99 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | 0.15 | — |
| 100 | EXELExelixis, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +24.4% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | +448% | 0.30 | — |
FTNT against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against FTNT, compared period by period and year by year.
How do FTNT's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at FTNT, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- AVGO, HPE and PANW were both more rewarding and calmer than FTNT over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, FTNT returned 20.7% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (44.8% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than FTNT with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | +49.0% | 49.0% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | +48.3% | 44.5% |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | +32.9% | 42.2% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | +31.9% | 43.4% |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | +26.3% | 52.7% |
| FTNT This pageFortinet, Inc. | +20.7% | 44.8% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | +17.1% | 30.8% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | +16.8% | 26.1% |
| ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | +14.0% | 42.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | +10.7% | 69.1% |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | +10.7% | 42.8% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | +10.1% | 59.7% |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | +2.8% | 29.0% |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | −3.5% | 38.8% |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | −3.7% | 39.2% |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | −5.2% | 53.7% |
| TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | −5.3% | 47.7% |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | −5.4% | 60.1% |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. | −6.3% | 57.9% |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | −18.9% | 62.9% |
| TLS Telos Corporation | −30.5% | 93.9% |
Has FTNT consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares FTNT with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than FTNT helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 21 popular alternatives, HPE, outperformed FTNT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- ANET outperformed FTNT over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so FTNT has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than FTNT over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. (this page) | — | −2.5% | +6.6% | +107% | +119% | +101% | +203% | +156% | +2,626% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | — | $125B | — |
| HPE QualifiedHewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 3/5 short2/3 long | −9.1% | +26.3% | +103% | +135% | +150% | +296% | +315% | +483% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | — | $74B | — |
| ANET Computer HardwareArista Networks, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −11.8% | +7.0% | +8.6% | +35.6% | +23.7% | +289% | +634% | +3,439% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | — | $229B | — |
| CRWD Software - InfrastructureCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −8.8% | +14.5% | +110% | +101% | +80.6% | +409% | +221% | — | 52.7% | 0.71 | −67.7% | — | $233B | — |
| AVGO SemiconductorsBroadcom Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −7.8% | −11.4% | −16.0% | −3.3% | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | — | $1.6T | — |
| PANW Software - InfrastructurePalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −8.5% | −2.4% | +101% | +89.7% | +60.6% | +180% | +299% | +1,274% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | — | $278B | — |
| NET Software - InfrastructureCloudflare, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −17.1% | +7.0% | +42.3% | +48.7% | +36.8% | +391% | +66.1% | — | 69.1% | 0.49 | −82.6% | — | $104B | — |
| OKTA Software - InfrastructureOkta, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +1.4% | +30.7% | +156% | +132% | +120% | +157% | −24.3% | — | 60.1% | 0.21 | −84.6% | — | $32B | — |
| QLYS Software - InfrastructureQualys, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +5.2% | +21.8% | +132% | +45.4% | +49.2% | +22.3% | +65.9% | +412% | 42.8% | 0.45 | −63.0% | — | $6.6B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | +946% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| FFIV Software - InfrastructureF5, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +1.5% | +10.9% | +45.4% | +78.0% | +54.0% | +208% | +120% | +287% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | — | $26B | — |
| ZS Software - InfrastructureZscaler, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +3.6% | +43.2% | +59.1% | −2.7% | −29.9% | +32.3% | −27.9% | — | 57.9% | 0.18 | −76.4% | — | $35B | — |
| VRNS Software - InfrastructureVaronis Systems, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +0.5% | +2.6% | +99.4% | +51.9% | −21.8% | +51.1% | −23.3% | +412% | 53.7% | 0.20 | −78.2% | — | $5.6B | — |
| RDWR Software - InfrastructureRadware Ltd. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −0.6% | −3.6% | +14.6% | +23.3% | +14.4% | +84.0% | −16.3% | +136% | 38.8% | 0.10 | −65.5% | — | $1.2B | — |
| CHKP Software - InfrastructureCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +4.9% | +3.8% | +2.0% | −22.2% | −27.1% | +4.6% | +14.8% | +82.7% | 29.0% | 0.24 | −51.8% | — | $14B | — |
| DDOG Software - ApplicationDatadog, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +4.6% | −2.6% | +97.6% | +91.7% | +64.1% | +198% | +61.4% | — | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | $92B | — |
| S Software - InfrastructureSentinelOne, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −7.6% | +13.1% | +53.6% | +50.3% | +28.4% | +37.7% | −64.8% | — | 62.9% | -0.01 | −84.4% | — | $7.5B | — |
| TENB Software - InfrastructureTenable Holdings, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +7.7% | +3.2% | +99.7% | +71.5% | +31.0% | −8.7% | −24.0% | — | 47.7% | 0.12 | −74.4% | — | $4.3B | — |
| TLS Information Technology ServicesTelos Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +9.4% | −3.5% | +0.5% | −11.1% | −37.9% | +89.3% | −83.8% | — | 93.9% | 0.12 | −96.0% | — | $330M | — |
| CSCO Communication EquipmentCisco Systems, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.9% | −3.2% | +22.6% | +42.2% | +53.8% | +118% | +118% | +374% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $421B | — |
| ATEN Software - InfrastructureA10 Networks, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.6% | −31.0% | −9.1% | +43.0% | +40.8% | +134% | +92.7% | +180% | 42.8% | 0.52 | −64.0% | — | $1.8B | — |
| AKAM Software - InfrastructureAkamai Technologies, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −23.7% | −27.2% | −8.2% | +5.3% | +20.7% | −13.8% | −17.1% | +58.0% | 39.2% | 0.10 | −46.8% | — | $13B | — |
How did FTNT do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2010, along with where FTNT ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with FTNT and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: FTNT began trading on November 18, 2009, so the table starts with 2010, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust or the 2008 financial crisis.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, FTNT finished in the top quarter in five of 16 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 19 of 22.
- FTNT finished ahead of the S&P 500 in nine of its 16 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, ANET came out ahead of FTNT most often, in eight of the 11 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of FTNT; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places FTNT among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of FTNT | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT This pageFortinet, Inc. | — | −16.0% | +61.4% | +19.7% | −32.0% | +142% | +39.2% | +51.5% | +61.2% | +45.2% | −3.4% | +1.6% | +60.1% | −8.8% | −3.7% | +34.6% | +84.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 16 | 19 of 22 | 3 of 22 | 17 of 22 | 12 of 22 | 1 of 21 | 14 of 20 | 3 of 17 | 2 of 15 | 5 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 7 of 13 | 4 of 10 | 10 of 10 | 6 of 8 | 1 of 8 | 4 of 8 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 16 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 3 of 10 | +15.5% | +29.1% | +9.7% | +4.5% | +37.4% | −21.9% | +23.7% | −5.7% | +8.6% | +54.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 8 of 11 | +18.6% | +87.7% | +94.1% | −15.6% | +97.9% | +42.9% | −3.5% | −10.5% | +143% | +24.2% | +28.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 6 | +37.0% | +34.0% | +143% | −48.6% | −3.3% | +325% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 11 of 16 | +50.6% | +110% | +104% | −13.3% | +56.5% | +45.0% | +29.0% | +2.2% | +48.2% | +23.6% | +46.1% | +93.4% | +70.0% | +12.0% | +3.0% | +55.4% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 7 of 13 | +1.2% | +23.4% | +111% | −24.8% | +56.7% | +53.7% | +22.8% | +29.9% | +15.9% | −29.0% | +43.7% | +113% | +7.4% | — | — | — |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 3 of 6 | +83.1% | +29.3% | +84.2% | −65.6% | +73.0% | +345% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | 5 of 8 | +9.7% | −13.0% | +32.5% | −69.5% | −11.8% | +120% | +80.8% | +149% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 7 of 13 | −5.2% | −28.6% | +74.9% | −18.2% | +12.6% | +46.2% | +11.6% | +25.9% | +87.5% | −4.3% | −12.3% | +63.3% | +56.3% | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 9 of 16 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% | +57.6% | +20.8% | +40.8% | +15.1% | +22.7% | +27.5% | +44.3% | +5.8% | −4.5% | −6.5% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 5 of 16 | +1.5% | +40.5% | +24.7% | −41.3% | +39.1% | +26.0% | −13.8% | +23.5% | −9.3% | +49.3% | −25.7% | +43.6% | −6.5% | −8.5% | −18.5% | +146% |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. | 3 of 7 | +24.7% | −18.6% | +98.0% | −65.2% | +60.9% | +329% | +18.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | 4 of 11 | −26.2% | −1.9% | +89.1% | −50.9% | −10.6% | +111% | +46.9% | +9.0% | +81.2% | +42.4% | −42.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | 4 of 16 | +6.9% | +35.1% | −15.5% | −52.6% | +50.0% | +7.6% | +13.5% | +17.1% | +33.1% | −5.0% | −30.3% | +22.5% | +9.0% | +12.8% | −22.0% | +148% |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 6 of 16 | −0.6% | +22.2% | +21.1% | +8.2% | −12.3% | +19.8% | +8.1% | −0.9% | +22.7% | +3.8% | +3.6% | +21.8% | +35.4% | −9.3% | +13.6% | +36.5% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −4.8% | +17.7% | +65.1% | −58.7% | +80.9% | +161% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −32.4% | −19.1% | +88.1% | −71.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 7 | −40.3% | −14.5% | +20.7% | −30.7% | +5.4% | +118% | +8.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TLS Telos Corporation | 1 of 5 | +49.1% | −6.3% | −28.3% | −67.0% | −53.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 5 of 16 | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% | +13.8% | +16.6% | +31.3% | +15.1% | +0.6% | +28.0% | +16.7% | +11.6% | −9.6% | −15.5% |
| ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | 5 of 11 | −2.6% | +42.1% | −19.4% | +1.7% | +68.5% | +43.6% | +10.2% | −19.2% | −7.1% | +26.7% | +50.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 6 of 16 | −8.8% | −19.2% | +40.4% | −28.0% | +11.5% | +21.6% | +41.4% | −6.1% | −2.5% | +26.7% | −16.4% | +33.5% | +15.3% | +26.7% | −31.4% | +85.7% |
Risk and diversification
How FTNT has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were FTNT's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents FTNT's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2009, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: FTNT began trading on November 18, 2009, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust or the 2008 financial crisis. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of FTNT's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: FTNT fell 41.8% from April 2012 to June 2013, while the S&P 500 rose 15.5%.
- The slowest recovery came after FTNT fell 51.2% from August 2015 to February 2016; it did not regain that peak until February 2018, two years later.
Green means FTNT fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | FTNT fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −51.2% | −10.7% | Aug 2015 | Feb 2016 | 6 months | Feb 2018 | 2 years |
| 2011 euro debt crisis | −42.3% | −14.8% | Jul 2011 | Sep 2011 | 2 months | Apr 2012 | 7 months |
| No named crash | −41.8% | +15.5% | Apr 2012 | Jun 2013 | 14 months | Dec 2014 | 18 months |
| No named crash | −38.3% | −2.7% | Jul 2023 | Nov 2023 | 4 months | Oct 2024 | 11 months |
| Covid crash | −37.6% | −28.2% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | May 2020 | 2 months |
How did FTNT do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far FTNT, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: FTNT began trading on November 18, 2009, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust or the 2008 financial crisis. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- FTNT fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the eight crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when FTNT fell 50.2% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, CHKP held up best, falling less than FTNT in all eight crashes they both traded through.
- FTNT began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but six of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was CHKP's 34.4%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than FTNT.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT This pageFortinet, Inc. | — | −4.9% | −30.6% | −36.5% | −29.0% | −4.4% | −50.2% | −23.0% | −4.1% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 8 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 1 of 5 | −7.2% | −30.5% | −45.3% | −27.4% | −9.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −1.5% | −36.6% | −31.2% | −31.2% | −6.1% | −36.6% | — | — | — | — |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −7.1% | −42.7% | −50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 4 of 8 | −2.8% | −34.3% | −46.8% | −15.2% | −4.5% | −21.6% | −26.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −2.1% | −30.6% | −46.8% | −29.1% | −3.3% | −40.2% | — | — | — | — |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −11.1% | −69.5% | −31.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OKTA Okta, Inc. | 2 of 5 | −7.0% | −76.4% | −31.1% | −33.4% | −2.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −4.2% | −24.9% | −27.9% | −24.4% | −6.2% | −55.8% | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 6 of 8 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 3 of 8 | −5.6% | −42.7% | −32.1% | −24.7% | −5.5% | −35.0% | −31.6% | −3.7% | −59.2% | −96.8% |
| ZS Zscaler, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −8.3% | −55.3% | −39.4% | −24.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −12.4% | −54.6% | −44.3% | −31.5% | −4.4% | −43.4% | — | — | — | — |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | 5 of 8 | −7.0% | −45.4% | −29.8% | −18.9% | −3.5% | −49.2% | −42.6% | −2.9% | −70.5% | −88.9% |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 8 of 8 | −1.9% | −26.6% | −30.2% | −15.9% | −3.5% | −16.7% | −18.5% | −1.3% | −34.4% | −89.3% |
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −9.5% | −53.0% | −38.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| S SentinelOne, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −10.4% | −59.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TENB Tenable Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 4 | −5.2% | −51.8% | −40.9% | −47.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TLS Telos Corporation | 0 of 2 | −20.2% | −55.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 6 of 8 | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | 4 of 6 | −5.8% | −23.3% | −51.5% | −10.9% | −2.8% | −39.3% | — | — | — | — |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 3 of 8 | −4.9% | −36.0% | −21.9% | −20.6% | −4.9% | −47.6% | −39.2% | −4.5% | −77.0% | −99.8% |
How closely does FTNT move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares FTNT with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, FTNT captured 159% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 92% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.09. Its share of the market's gains was larger than its share of the losses.
- Only PANW, ANET and AVGO had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than FTNT's 1.72, out of 13 popular alternatives with the same record.
- AVGO took just 86% of the S&P 500's losses, against 92% for FTNT, while still keeping 158% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than FTNT's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT This pageFortinet, Inc. | 159% | 92% | 1.72 | 1.09 |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 118% | 49% | 2.44 | 1.14 |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 174% | 91% | 1.92 | 1.40 |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86% | 1.85 | 1.19 |
| QLYS Qualys, Inc. | 81% | 51% | 1.57 | 0.63 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 127% | 91% | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 116% | 102% | 1.14 | 1.31 |
| VRNS Varonis Systems, Inc. | 99% | 89% | 1.11 | 1.00 |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 101% | 96% | 1.06 | 0.97 |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 87% | 84% | 1.03 | 1.04 |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 57% | 66% | 0.86 | 0.55 |
| ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | 86% | 101% | 0.85 | 1.04 |
| RDWR Radware Ltd. | 80% | 104% | 0.76 | 0.88 |
| CHKP Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | 59% | 83% | 0.71 | 0.58 |
What diversifies FTNT?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with FTNT's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing FTNT with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in FTNT into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+25.1% for FTNT alone, +25.7% for the mix).
- MPC made money in five of the five calendar years in which FTNT lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of FTNT over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.12 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which FTNT lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% FTNT and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2016 | 2013 | 2012 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +156% | 0.65 | −16.0% | −32.0% | −3.4% | −8.8% | −3.7% | 44.3% | +25.1% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | -0.02 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | — | — | — | 35.5% | +25.1% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.12 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | +1.1% | +41.3% | +19.6% | 35.8% | +27.1% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.09 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | +29.8% | +16.6% | — | 35.8% | +24.7% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.10 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +7.1% | +15.9% | +23.8% | +9.6% | 35.9% | +24.0% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.33 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | +35.6% | +33.4% | +8.6% | 38.3% | +29.3% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.25 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | −5.1% | +6.3% | +26.4% | +20.9% | 36.1% | +24.2% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.11 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | +8.0% | −28.3% | +6.6% | 35.2% | +25.7% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.40 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −10.4% | +7.4% | — | — | 37.3% | +25.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 2016 | 2013 | 2012 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +156% | 0.65 | −16.0% | −32.0% | −3.4% | −8.8% | −3.7% | 44.3% | +25.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.15 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | −17.5% | +66.0% | +3.8% | 36.6% | +29.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.08 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | +7.4% | +27.6% | +11.2% | 38.2% | +43.4% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.21 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | +18.3% | +61.7% | +15.7% | 38.3% | +38.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.04 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | −28.3% | +67.7% | +25.6% | 35.6% | +29.2% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.06 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | +0.7% | +48.6% | +94.3% | 36.4% | +32.0% |
Common questions
What was FTNT's worst drawdown?
FTNT's deepest decline since it began trading in 2009 was 51.2%, from August 2015 to February 2016. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because FTNT launched in November 2009, that record does not include the dot-com bust or the 2008 financial crisis.
What were FTNT's best and worst years?
Over 16 full calendar years, FTNT's best year was 2021, when it returned 142%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -32.0%.
Is there a better investment than FTNT?
Among FTNT's popular alternatives, HPE earned more than FTNT with less volatility over the past 5 years: 32.9% a year at 42.2% volatility, against 20.7% a year at 44.8%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TSM (semiconductors) and SMH (semiconductors) earned more than FTNT with less volatility over the past 5 years. TSM returned 31.5% a year at 38.5% volatility, against 20.7% a year at 44.8%.
Is FTNT more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. FTNT's volatility over the past 5 years was 44.8%, 2.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, FTNT's return lands within 44.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is FTNT's Sharpe ratio?
FTNT's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.65, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so FTNT earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is FTNT with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, FTNT's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.36 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against FTNT instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a FTNT holding.
What are the best alternatives to FTNT?
Of the 21 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed FTNT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: HPE.
Did FTNT outperform the S&P 500?
FTNT finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in nine of 16 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -16.0%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did FTNT do in stock market crashes?
FTNT fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the eight major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when FTNT fell 50.2% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies FTNT?
These had a low correlation with FTNT over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation -0.02), DXJ (correlation 0.12) and EMLP (correlation 0.09); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.15), CLS (correlation 0.08) and FIX (correlation 0.21). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than FTNT's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of FTNT's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to FTNT
HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise
ANETArista Networks
CRWDCrowdStrike
AVGOBroadcom
PANWPalo Alto Networks
NETCloudflare
MSFTMicrosoft
DDOGDatadog
CSCOCisco Systems