Relative Intelligence · Application Software

How Datadog (DDOG) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on DDOG alone. It places DDOG (Datadog, Inc.) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where DDOG stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: DDOG's full trading record, from September 2019 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowDDOG has run far ahead of the market, rising 97.6% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 6 months, SNOW (Snowflake) rose 112% and ORCL (Oracle) fell 25.6%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is DDOG's own: it fell 2.6% over the past 3 months while the application software ETF IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) rose 15.0%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its application software peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: MSFT (Microsoft) rose 32.5%, while CSCO (Cisco Systems) fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, DDOG rose 64.1% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (198% against 89.3%). On the flip side, DDOG finished behind the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termDDOG turned $10,000 into $16,100 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, DDOG fell 53.0%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than MSFT (Microsoft, 31.0%) but less than SNOW (Snowflake, 64.1%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 5 years, DDOG's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.51: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.1 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.2 times as much. DDOG is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.40 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.41 with the total US market, more closely than 51% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft) earned more than DDOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. HPE returned 32.9% a year at 42.2% volatility, against 10.1% a year at 59.7%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- ASX (ASE Technology Holding, semiconductors) and TER (Teradyne, semiconductor equipment) earned more than DDOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. ASX returned 48.8% a year at 43.0% volatility, against 10.1% a year at 59.7%.
- Whole market
- 1,028 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than DDOG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA (NVIDIA), AAPL (Apple) and GOOG (Alphabet).
How much would $10,000 in DDOG have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in DDOG over the past 7 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of DDOG over the same span and DDOG's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: DDOG began trading on September 19, 2019, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 7 years of DDOG's record, starting at the end of September 2019.
- $10,000 invested in DDOG at the end of September 2019 would have grown to $80,755 by September 2026, more than the $28,402 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of DDOG, and NVDA finished highest, at $528,672.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2019 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 125 of the 3,144 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of DDOG; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$528,672+5,187% total · +76.3% a year
- NET$187,012+1,770% total · +51.9% a year
- CRWD$181,581+1,716% total · +51.3% a year
- ASX$132,325+1,223% total · +44.6% a year
- PANW$116,957+1,070% total · +42.1% a year
- DDOG$80,755+708% total · +34.8% a year
- HPE$51,986+420% total · +26.6% a year
- MSFT$39,234+292% total · +21.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$28,402+184% total · +16.1% a year
- IBM$21,137+111% total · +11.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 853 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of DDOG; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- HPE$51,318+413% total · +38.7% a year
- CRWD$43,090+331% total · +33.9% a year
- NET$30,828+208% total · +25.3% a year
- FROG$28,966+190% total · +23.7% a year
- GOOG$25,811+158% total · +20.9% a year
- CSCO$22,737+127% total · +17.9% a year
- DDOG$19,374+93.7% total · +14.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- MSFT$18,958+89.6% total · +13.6% a year
DDOG at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: DDOG began trading on September 19, 2019, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
- DDOG's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 68.1%, from November 2021 to April 2023. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over six full calendar years, DDOG's best was 2020, when it returned 161%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 58.7%. It lost money in two of those years.
- DDOG is 12.6% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $92B
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Price history from
- September 2019
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +64.1%total return
- Past 3 years
- +198%+43.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +61.4%+10.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +161%2020
- Worst calendar year
- −58.7%2022
- Losing years
- 2 of 6full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 59.7%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.45return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −68.1%Nov 2021 to Apr 2023
- From its all-time high
- −12.6%below the peak
DDOG against the whole market
Where DDOG ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does DDOG rank among all stocks?
This section ranks DDOG on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how DDOG stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- DDOG is among the more volatile stocks: its price swings rank in the bottom 22% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
- DDOG's 1-year return ranks in the top 12% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | DDOG | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +64.1% | 379 of 3,287 | top 12% |
| 3-year return | +198% | 415 of 3,017 | top 14% |
| 5-year return | +61.4% | 983 of 2,893 | top 34% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 59.7% | 2,267 of 2,893 | bottom 23% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.45 | 1,075 of 2,893 | top 37% |
What has beaten DDOG on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). DDOG sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than DDOG with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 712 stocks and 316 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than DDOG over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 28% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half DDOG's swings, FIX has the best return for its risk: 77.0% a year at 46.7% volatility, 22% less than DDOG's 59.7%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.46 against 0.45 for DDOG. BELFB earned the most, 78.0% a year, while still swinging less than DDOG (52.1% against 59.7%).
- Among DDOG's popular alternatives, NVDA, HPE and PANW are in the region. NVDA earned 58.0% a year against 10.1% a year for DDOG, at 51.9% volatility, 13% less than DDOG's 59.7%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to DDOG; faint dots are 90 more of the 1,028 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than DDOG?
Investments that beat DDOG over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among DDOG's popular alternatives, HPE, GOOG and MSFT earned more than DDOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. HPE returned 32.9% a year at 42.2% volatility, against 10.1% a year at 59.7%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ASX (semiconductors) and TER (semiconductor equipment) earned more than DDOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. ASX returned 48.8% a year at 43.0% volatility, against 10.1% a year at 59.7%.
- Across the whole market, 1,028 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than DDOG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVDA, AAPL and GOOG.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat DDOG over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks DDOG's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than DDOG follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than DDOG's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× DDOG's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than DDOG's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with DDOG?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +10.1% | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | +61.4% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.40 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against DDOG. 9 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +315% | 0.56 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +138% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +80.3% | 0.40 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +118% | 0.49 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.3% | 52.7% | 0.71 | −67.7% | +221% | 0.74 | — | ||
FROGJFrog Ltd. · Application Software | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +20.8% | 57.9% | 0.61 | −80.4% | +157% | 0.62 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Application Software and Software and the categories next to it (Enterprise Software, Payment Processing, Semiconductors), plus DDOG's specific themes. 44 of 121 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +631% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +24.0% | 54.3% | 0.67 | −59.1% | +193% | 0.27 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +82.5% | -0.02 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +38.7% | 46.7% | 0.94 | −46.3% | +413% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +68.1% | 57.1% | 1.20 | −57.6% | +1,244% | 0.50 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +9.9% | 33.7% | 0.45 | −33.4% | +60.5% | 0.20 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,321 of 3,493 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | +839% | -0.19 | — | |
FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +52.6% | 49.7% | 1.10 | −52.0% | +726% | -0.14 | — | |
EXELExelixis, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +24.4% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | +198% | 0.23 | — | |
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +226% | 0.01 | — | |
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +301% | 0.12 | — | |
FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | +168% | 0.40 | 0.19% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +57.3% | 64.5% | 1.03 | −66.9% | +863% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +64.0% | 0.24 | 0.04% | ||
What these numbers mean for DDOG
- Annual return
- DDOG returned 10.1% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $16,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- DDOG's volatility over the past 5 years was 59.7%, 3.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, DDOG's return lands within 59.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- DDOG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.45, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so DDOG earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- DDOG's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 68.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 68.1% fall takes a 214% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, DDOG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.40 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against DDOG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a DDOG holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 1,028 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than DDOG with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with DDOG | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INSWInternational Seaways, Inc. · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +56.5% | 40.5% | 1.31 | −57.4% | +839% | -0.19 | — |
| 2 | FROFrontline Plc · Oil & Gas | Whole market | +52.6% | 49.7% | 1.10 | −52.0% | +726% | -0.14 | — |
| 3 | Same or nearby category | +48.8% | 43.0% | 1.15 | −52.5% | +631% | 0.31 | — | |
| 4 | EXELExelixis, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +24.4% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | +198% | 0.23 | — |
| 5 | HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +26.6% | 40.4% | 0.79 | −49.1% | +226% | 0.01 | — |
| 6 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +301% | 0.12 | — |
| 7 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | +168% | 0.40 | 0.19% |
| 8 | VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +20.8% | 33.8% | 0.73 | −56.2% | +158% | 0.05 | — |
| 9 | Whole market | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +800% | 0.59 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.13 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +133% | 0.39 | — | |
| 12 | FTXLFirst Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Whole market | +27.4% | 38.8% | 0.82 | −43.9% | +235% | 0.47 | 0.60% |
| 13 | CPACCementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +24.4% | 38.8% | 0.74 | −55.9% | +198% | -0.01 | — |
| 14 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.12 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +72.6% | 0.41 | 0.03% | |
| 16 | VBNKVersaBank · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.7% | 35.1% | 0.57 | −50.7% | +98.2% | 0.23 | — |
| 17 | Whole market | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +82.3% | 0.40 | 0.03% | |
| 18 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +158% | -0.16 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +87.8% | -0.05 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +218% | -0.07 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +318% | 0.03 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +82.1% | -0.19 | — | |
| 23 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | 0.14 | 0.48% |
| 24 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | -0.12 | 0.40% |
| 25 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +98.2% | -0.13 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +31.1% | 31.9% | 1.01 | −43.4% | +288% | 0.11 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +123% | 0.16 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +97.2% | 0.54 | 0.18% | |
| 29 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +319% | 0.07 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +159% | -0.12 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +690% | -0.10 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +49.0% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | +634% | 0.16 | — | |
| 33 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +413% | -0.11 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +113% | -0.10 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +121% | -0.16 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +329% | 0.30 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +76.6% | 0.13 | 0.03% | |
| 38 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +145% | -0.25 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +180% | -0.21 | — | |
| 40 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Whole market | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | +245% | 0.21 | — |
| 41 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +326% | 0.08 | — | |
| 42 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +126% | -0.19 | 0.40% | |
| 43 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +72.6% | -0.07 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +133% | 0.60 | 0.09% | |
| 45 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +327% | -0.01 | — | |
| 46 | Same or nearby category | +24.0% | 54.3% | 0.67 | −59.1% | +193% | 0.27 | — | |
| 47 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +136% | -0.05 | — | |
| 48 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +162% | -0.27 | — | |
| 49 | Popular alternative | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +315% | 0.56 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +177% | -0.18 | — | |
| 51 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +126% | -0.20 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +31.4% | 42.1% | 0.86 | −51.5% | +292% | 0.08 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +96.1% | -0.08 | — | |
| 54 | Whole market | +29.5% | 38.4% | 0.87 | −54.2% | +264% | -0.19 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +11.3% | 13.8% | 0.85 | −35.2% | +71.1% | 0.09 | 0.04% | |
| 56 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +195% | -0.10 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +221% | 0.17 | — | |
| 58 | Whole market | +18.6% | 39.1% | 0.63 | −62.4% | +135% | -0.19 | — | |
| 59 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +121% | 0.15 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +11.1% | 24.2% | 0.56 | −36.7% | +69.0% | -0.17 | — | |
| 61 | Whole market | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +70.1% | -0.04 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +91.5% | -0.02 | — | |
| 63 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.13 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +110% | -0.14 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +99.4% | -0.05 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +45.2% | 52.6% | 0.97 | −49.5% | +546% | 0.18 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +27.5% | 36.9% | 0.85 | −46.7% | +236% | -0.14 | — | |
| 68 | ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +435% | 0.13 | — |
| 69 | Whole market | +11.8% | 22.6% | 0.61 | −39.2% | +74.5% | -0.04 | — | |
| 70 | ATIATI Inc. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +61.8% | 42.9% | 1.34 | −82.4% | +1,008% | 0.12 | — |
| 71 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +79.4% | -0.17 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +17.9% | 26.1% | 0.76 | −37.9% | +128% | 0.00 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +18.9% | 37.3% | 0.65 | −53.9% | +138% | -0.07 | — | |
| 74 | Whole market | +11.9% | 19.4% | 0.68 | −54.4% | +75.1% | -0.32 | — | |
| 75 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +108% | 0.02 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +85.4% | 0.51 | 0.04% | |
| 77 | Whole market | +24.1% | 39.9% | 0.74 | −38.2% | +194% | 0.14 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +13.3% | 30.0% | 0.57 | −39.2% | +86.6% | 0.09 | — | |
| 79 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | +98.5% | 0.44 | 0.26% | |
| 80 | AMALAmalgamated Financial Corp. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +24.7% | 33.4% | 0.83 | −62.9% | +202% | 0.11 | — |
| 81 | IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +200% | 0.17 | — |
| 82 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | +156% | -0.14 | 0.80% |
| 83 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +270% | -0.06 | — |
| 84 | Whole market | +12.3% | 25.3% | 0.59 | −42.1% | +78.6% | -0.34 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +159% | 0.68 | — | |
| 86 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +89.0% | -0.05 | 0.31% |
| 87 | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +76.3% | -0.24 | — | |
| 88 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +100% | -0.10 | — |
| 89 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +89.2% | 0.06 | 0.25% |
| 90 | Whole market | +77.0% | 46.7% | 1.46 | −49.7% | +1,636% | 0.18 | — | |
| 91 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +136% | 0.39 | 0.13% |
| 92 | KRTKarat Packaging Inc. · Packaging & Containers | Whole market | +25.4% | 44.1% | 0.74 | −48.4% | +210% | 0.18 | — |
| 93 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Whole market | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +208% | -0.07 | — |
| 94 | Whole market | +12.3% | 27.3% | 0.56 | −43.8% | +78.5% | -0.17 | — | |
| 95 | FERFerrovial N.V. · Infrastructure | Whole market | +13.4% | 31.3% | 0.56 | −38.9% | +87.6% | 0.03 | — |
| 96 | COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +461% | -0.10 | — |
| 97 | UTHRUnited Therapeutics Corporation · Biotechnology | Whole market | +23.6% | 35.1% | 0.78 | −55.6% | +188% | -0.05 | — |
| 98 | SLViShares Silver Trust · Silver | Whole market | +18.3% | 37.5% | 0.64 | −52.4% | +131% | -0.11 | 0.50% |
| 99 | NMRNomura Holdings, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +17.1% | 29.9% | 0.68 | −54.0% | +120% | 0.08 | — |
| 100 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +83.3% | -0.12 | 0.08% |
DDOG against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against DDOG, compared period by period and year by year.
How do DDOG's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at DDOG, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Nine of the 19 popular alternatives, led by NVDA, HPE and PANW, were both more rewarding and calmer than DDOG over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, DDOG returned 10.1% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (59.7% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than DDOG with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | +32.9% | 42.2% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | +31.9% | 43.4% |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | +26.3% | 52.7% |
| FROG JFrog Ltd. | +20.8% | 57.9% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | +19.0% | 32.0% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | +16.8% | 26.1% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | +16.6% | 30.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | +12.5% | 28.2% |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | +10.7% | 69.1% |
| DDOG This pageDatadog, Inc. | +10.1% | 59.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | +7.7% | 44.3% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | +1.9% | 45.5% |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | −0.9% | 62.6% |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | −3.6% | 41.6% |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | −6.2% | 71.1% |
| ESTC Elastic N.V. | −10.7% | 60.4% |
| GTLB GitLab Inc. | −12.2% | 73.1% |
| PD PagerDuty, Inc. | −16.7% | 57.1% |
Has DDOG consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares DDOG with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than DDOG helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Three of the 19 popular alternatives, HPE, CRWD and FROG, outperformed DDOG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
- HPE and CRWD outperformed DDOG in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- NVDA, HPE and PANW earned more for the risk they took than DDOG (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than DDOG over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. (this page) | — | +4.6% | −2.6% | +97.6% | +91.7% | +64.1% | +198% | +61.4% | 59.7% | 0.45 | −68.1% | — | $92B | — |
| HPE QualifiedHewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 4/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | −9.1% | +26.3% | +103% | +135% | +150% | +296% | +315% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | — | $74B | — |
| CRWD QualifiedCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 4/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | −8.8% | +14.5% | +110% | +101% | +80.6% | +409% | +221% | 52.7% | 0.71 | −67.7% | — | $233B | — |
| FROG QualifiedJFrog Ltd. | 3/5 short2/2 long | +0.4% | +2.1% | +103% | +55.1% | +92.5% | +313% | +157% | 57.9% | 0.61 | −80.4% | — | $11B | — |
| NVDA SemiconductorsNVIDIA Corporation | 1/5 short2/2 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| NET Software - InfrastructureCloudflare, Inc. | 1/5 short2/2 long | −17.1% | +7.0% | +42.3% | +48.7% | +36.8% | +391% | +66.1% | 69.1% | 0.49 | −82.6% | — | $104B | — |
| MSFT Software - InfrastructureMicrosoft Corporation | 2/5 short1/2 long | +6.0% | +32.5% | +27.7% | +13.2% | +3.8% | +66.6% | +80.3% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | — | $3.9T | — |
| PANW Software - InfrastructurePalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 1/5 short1/2 long | −8.5% | −2.4% | +101% | +89.7% | +60.6% | +180% | +299% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | — | $278B | — |
| IBM Information Technology ServicesInternational Business Machines Corporation | 1/5 short1/2 long | +4.3% | +14.4% | −3.3% | −15.3% | −12.5% | +93.5% | +116% | 30.5% | 0.66 | −41.1% | — | $228B | — |
| GOOG Internet Content & InformationAlphabet Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | −4.1% | −4.2% | +0.4% | +6.9% | +31.2% | +148% | +138% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | — | $4.1T | — |
| CSCO Communication EquipmentCisco Systems, Inc. | 0/5 short1/2 long | −3.9% | −3.2% | +22.6% | +42.2% | +53.8% | +118% | +118% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $421B | — |
| GTLB Software - ApplicationGitLab Inc. | 3/5 short0/2 long | +10.5% | +61.4% | +154% | +52.0% | +16.8% | +24.1% | −47.9% | 73.1% | 0.18 | −85.2% | — | $9.2B | — |
| PD Software - ApplicationPagerDuty, Inc. | 3/5 short0/2 long | +17.1% | +63.7% | +160% | +36.6% | +6.9% | −13.8% | −59.9% | 57.1% | -0.04 | −90.0% | — | $1.3B | — |
| NOW Software - ApplicationServiceNow, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +8.6% | +42.8% | +50.0% | +1.4% | −18.5% | +37.8% | +9.8% | 45.5% | 0.27 | −64.5% | — | $155B | — |
| SNOW Software - ApplicationSnowflake Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | −5.8% | +16.5% | +112% | +47.5% | +30.1% | +116% | −4.3% | 62.6% | 0.29 | −73.0% | — | $113B | — |
| DT Software - ApplicationDynatrace, Inc. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +12.8% | +42.3% | +79.6% | +50.3% | +27.0% | +37.4% | −16.9% | 41.6% | 0.12 | −61.8% | — | $18B | — |
| ESTC Software - ApplicationElastic N.V. | 2/5 short0/2 long | +6.6% | +52.4% | +95.3% | +31.8% | +14.1% | +20.1% | −43.3% | 60.4% | 0.11 | −76.8% | — | $10B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| ORCL Software - InfrastructureOracle Corporation | 1/5 short0/2 long | −11.4% | +8.4% | −25.6% | −32.1% | −52.1% | +33.3% | +45.1% | 44.3% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $396B | — |
| MDB Software - InfrastructureMongoDB, Inc. | 1/5 short0/2 long | −10.1% | +13.2% | +38.6% | −8.4% | +11.8% | +5.7% | −27.4% | 71.1% | 0.26 | −76.5% | — | $29B | — |
How did DDOG do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2020, along with where DDOG ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with DDOG and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: DDOG began trading on September 19, 2019, so the table starts with 2020, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
- Among its popular alternatives, CRWD came out ahead of DDOG most often, in five of the six years both traded.
- DDOG finished ahead of the S&P 500 in three of its six full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last two.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, DDOG finished in the top quarter in two of six years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 15 of 20.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of DDOG; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places DDOG among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of DDOG | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDOG This pageDatadog, Inc. | — | −4.8% | +17.7% | +65.1% | −58.7% | +80.9% | +161% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 2 of 6 | 15 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 9 of 20 | 18 of 20 | 2 of 19 | 4 of 17 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 6 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 3 of 6 | +15.5% | +29.1% | +9.7% | +4.5% | +37.4% | −21.9% |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 5 of 6 | +37.0% | +34.0% | +143% | −48.6% | −3.3% | +325% |
| FROG JFrog Ltd. | 2 of 5 | +112% | −15.0% | +62.3% | −28.2% | −52.7% | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 5 of 6 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 4 of 6 | +83.1% | +29.3% | +84.2% | −65.6% | +73.0% | +345% |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 2 of 6 | +15.6% | +12.9% | +58.2% | −28.0% | +52.5% | +42.5% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 4 of 6 | +1.2% | +23.4% | +111% | −24.8% | +56.7% | +53.7% |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 3 of 6 | +38.2% | +39.3% | +21.9% | +10.6% | +16.6% | −1.2% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 3 of 6 | +65.4% | +35.6% | +58.8% | −38.7% | +65.2% | +31.0% |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3 of 6 | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% |
| GTLB GitLab Inc. | 1 of 4 | −33.4% | −10.5% | +38.6% | −47.8% | — | — |
| PD PagerDuty, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −28.2% | −21.1% | −12.8% | −23.6% | −16.7% | +78.3% |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −27.8% | +50.0% | +82.0% | −40.2% | +17.9% | +95.0% |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 1 of 5 | +42.1% | −22.4% | +38.6% | −57.6% | +20.4% | — |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −20.3% | −0.6% | +42.8% | −36.5% | +39.5% | +71.0% |
| ESTC Elastic N.V. | 1 of 6 | −23.9% | −12.1% | +119% | −58.2% | −15.8% | +127% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 4 of 6 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 3 of 6 | +18.1% | +60.0% | +30.9% | −4.7% | +36.9% | +24.3% |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 3 of 6 | +80.3% | −43.1% | +108% | −62.8% | +47.4% | +173% |
Risk and diversification
How DDOG has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were DDOG's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents DDOG's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2019, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: DDOG began trading on September 19, 2019, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of DDOG's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: DDOG fell 48.6% from November 2025 to February 2026, while the S&P 500 rose 0.4%.
- The slowest recovery came after DDOG fell 68.1% from November 2021 to April 2023; it did not regain that peak until November 2025, three years later.
Green means DDOG fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | DDOG fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −68.1% | −11.1% | Nov 2021 | Apr 2023 | 17 months | Nov 2025 | 2.6 years |
| No named crash | −48.6% | +0.4% | Nov 2025 | Feb 2026 | 3 months | May 2026 | 3 months |
| Covid crash | −42.1% | −28.9% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | May 2020 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −39.5% | +7.7% | Feb 2021 | May 2021 | 3 months | Aug 2021 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −27.4% | −0.8% | Aug 2026 | Sep 2026 | 1 month | Oct 2026 | 1 month |
How did DDOG do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far DDOG, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: DDOG began trading on September 19, 2019, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- DDOG fell further than the S&P 500 in all three crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DDOG fell 53.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, MSFT held up best, falling less than DDOG in all three crashes they both traded through.
- DDOG began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but seven of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was ORCL's 41.1%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than DDOG.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDOG This pageDatadog, Inc. | — | −9.5% | −53.0% | −38.8% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 3 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 2 of 3 | −7.2% | −30.5% | −45.3% | −27.4% | −9.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −7.1% | −42.7% | −50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FROG JFrog Ltd. | 1 of 2 | −14.1% | −43.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 2 of 3 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −11.1% | −69.5% | −31.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 3 of 3 | −2.0% | −31.0% | −27.7% | −18.2% | −7.4% | −14.4% | −14.1% | −2.6% | −57.9% | −62.9% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 2 of 3 | −2.1% | −30.6% | −46.8% | −29.1% | −3.3% | −40.2% | — | — | — | — |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 3 of 3 | −2.0% | −16.7% | −37.3% | −29.1% | −6.3% | −23.3% | −14.6% | −1.5% | −44.3% | −58.3% |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 3 of 3 | −3.9% | −35.0% | −30.8% | −18.9% | −9.9% | −12.7% | −21.1% | −1.1% | −65.3% | — |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| GTLB GitLab Inc. | 0 of 2 | −11.3% | −57.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PD PagerDuty, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −10.4% | −43.3% | −41.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −7.2% | −39.9% | −28.8% | −20.6% | −8.5% | −47.6% | — | — | — | — |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 1 of 2 | −7.8% | −64.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −9.2% | −46.9% | −45.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ESTC Elastic N.V. | 0 of 3 | −11.5% | −54.4% | −40.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 3 of 3 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 3 of 3 | −5.0% | −31.0% | −28.3% | −17.2% | −6.6% | −16.1% | −23.9% | −2.1% | −41.1% | −84.2% |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 0 of 3 | −15.1% | −61.3% | −45.0% | −24.9% | −2.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does DDOG move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares DDOG with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- PANW took just -13% of the S&P 500's losses, against 119% for DDOG, while still keeping 104% of its gains.
- Over the past 5 years, DDOG captured 112% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 119% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.51. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Eight of the 17 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than DDOG's 0.94, led by CRWD, HPE and NVDA.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than DDOG's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDOG This pageDatadog, Inc. | 112% | 119% | 0.94 | 1.51 |
| CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 122% | 38% | 3.21 | 1.19 |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 154% | 72% | 2.15 | 1.39 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 259% | 152% | 1.70 | 2.21 |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 118% | 72% | 1.65 | 1.64 |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 98% | 75% | 1.31 | 0.99 |
| FROG JFrog Ltd. | 146% | 127% | 1.15 | 1.23 |
| GOOG Alphabet Inc. | 140% | 132% | 1.07 | 1.20 |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 106% | 104% | 1.02 | 0.73 |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 115% | 126% | 0.91 | 1.10 |
| ORCL Oracle Corporation | 159% | 213% | 0.75 | 1.77 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 125% | 170% | 0.74 | 1.45 |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 83% | 134% | 0.62 | 1.35 |
| NOW ServiceNow, Inc. | 85% | 142% | 0.60 | 0.99 |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 145% | 285% | 0.51 | 1.74 |
| DT Dynatrace, Inc. | 57% | 127% | 0.44 | 0.77 |
| ESTC Elastic N.V. | 66% | 177% | 0.37 | 1.04 |
| PD PagerDuty, Inc. | 36% | 187% | 0.19 | 0.98 |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 104% | -13% | — | 0.93 |
What diversifies DDOG?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with DDOG's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing DDOG with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in DDOG into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+14.1% for DDOG alone, +17.9% for the mix).
- LVHI made money in two of the two calendar years in which DDOG lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of DDOG over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.14 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which DDOG lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% DDOG and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +61.4% | 0.45 | −4.8% | −58.7% | 59.4% | +14.1% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | -0.12 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +3.8% | 47.3% | +17.2% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.14 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +6.0% | 47.9% | +19.0% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | -0.05 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +10.4% | 47.4% | +16.9% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | -0.12 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +11.9% | +7.1% | 47.2% | +16.4% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.48 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −33.5% | 51.2% | +20.4% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.14 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | −5.1% | 47.9% | +16.4% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.19 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −0.8% | 47.0% | +17.9% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.39 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −10.4% | 49.2% | +17.6% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDOG Datadog, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +61.4% | 0.45 | −4.8% | −58.7% | 59.4% | +14.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.13 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +54.1% | 48.4% | +21.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.32 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +1.3% | 52.4% | +32.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.18 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +17.0% | 49.9% | +29.7% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | -0.11 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +51.8% | 47.2% | +21.2% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | -0.10 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +86.6% | 47.3% | +24.1% |
Common questions
What was DDOG's worst drawdown?
DDOG's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 68.1%, from November 2021 to April 2023. It took about three years from the low to climb back to its old high. Because DDOG launched in September 2019, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
What were DDOG's best and worst years?
Over six full calendar years, DDOG's best year was 2020, when it returned 161%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -58.7%.
Is there a better investment than DDOG?
Among DDOG's popular alternatives, HPE, GOOG and MSFT earned more than DDOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. HPE returned 32.9% a year at 42.2% volatility, against 10.1% a year at 59.7%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, ASX (semiconductors) and TER (semiconductor equipment) earned more than DDOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. ASX returned 48.8% a year at 43.0% volatility, against 10.1% a year at 59.7%.
Is DDOG more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. DDOG's volatility over the past 5 years was 59.7%, 3.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, DDOG's return lands within 59.7% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is DDOG's Sharpe ratio?
DDOG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.45, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so DDOG earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is DDOG with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, DDOG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.40 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against DDOG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a DDOG holding.
What are the best alternatives to DDOG?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, three outperformed DDOG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: HPE, CRWD and FROG.
Did DDOG outperform the S&P 500?
DDOG finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of six full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -4.8%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did DDOG do in stock market crashes?
DDOG fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the three major crashes it has traded through, and further in three. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DDOG fell 53.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies DDOG?
These had a low correlation with DDOG over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation -0.12), DXJ (correlation 0.14) and EMLP (correlation -0.05); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.13), CLS (correlation 0.32) and FIX (correlation 0.18). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than DDOG's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of DDOG's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.