Relative Intelligence · Banks

How HSBC compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on HSBC alone. It places HSBC (HSBC Holdings plc) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where HSBC stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: HSBC's full trading record, from September 1995 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, HSBC fell 5.9% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its bank peers were far apart over the past 3 months, from JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co., down 0.6%) to BAC (Bank of America, down 15.8%). Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?HSBC's 5.9% fall over the past 3 months is part of a broader banks sell-off: the banks ETF KBE (State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF) fell 6.8%, with BAC (Bank of America, down 15.8%) and RY (Royal Bank of Canada, down 4.8%). Its bank peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) fell 0.6%, while BAC fell 15.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsHSBC has run far ahead of the market, rising 47.7% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (201% against 89.3%). HSBC finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termThe past 5 years have been the better stretch: HSBC rose 318% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. HSBC's 10-year return of 319% puts it ahead of 76% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Market rank ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, HSBC has typically fallen 1.2 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 10 years HSBC kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: 79% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 53% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.58. Against the S&P 500, HSBC has a correlation of 0.37 over 5 years, less closely than 57% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce), BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria) and MFG (Mizuho Financial Group) were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CIB (Grupo Cibest, banks) and NWG (NatWest Group, banks) were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (32.9% and 34.1% volatility against 25.9%).
- Whole market
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than HSBC with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How much would $10,000 in HSBC have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in HSBC over the past 27 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of HSBC over the same span and HSBC's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in HSBC at the end of September 1999 would have grown to $64,783 by September 2026, less than the $95,018 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of HSBC, and RY finished highest, at $500,230.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1999 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 775 of the 1,166 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of HSBC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- RY$500,230+4,902% total · +15.6% a year
- CM$408,092+3,981% total · +14.7% a year
- GS$215,124+2,051% total · +12.0% a year
- JPM$141,770+1,318% total · +10.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$95,018+850% total · +8.7% a year
- BBVA$80,684+707% total · +8.0% a year
- HSBC$64,783+548% total · +7.2% a year
- SAN$62,862+529% total · +7.0% a year
- ING$36,638+266% total · +4.9% a year
- MUFG$28,101+181% total · +3.9% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 114 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of HSBC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- MPC$71,516+615% total · +48.2% a year
- PBR-A$67,821+578% total · +46.6% a year
- BBVA$57,750+478% total · +42.0% a year
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- HSBC$51,297+413% total · +38.7% a year
- MFG$46,041+360% total · +35.7% a year
- ING$35,607+256% total · +28.9% a year
- CM$25,433+154% total · +20.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
HSBC at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- HSBC's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 74.5%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It took about 15 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 27 full calendar years, HSBC's best was 2025, when it returned 67.9%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 38.0%. It lost money in 11 of those years.
- HSBC is 13.6% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $324B
- Industry
- Banks - Diversified
- Price history from
- September 1995
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +47.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +201%+44.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- +318%+33.1% a year
- Past 10 years
- +319%+15.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +67.9%2025
- Worst calendar year
- −38.0%2008
- Losing years
- 11 of 27full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 25.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 1.24return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −74.5%Oct 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −13.6%below the peak
HSBC against the whole market
Where HSBC ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does HSBC rank among all stocks?
This section ranks HSBC on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how HSBC stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), HSBC ranks in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | HSBC | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +47.7% | 591 of 3,287 | top 18% |
| 3-year return | +201% | 402 of 3,017 | top 13% |
| 5-year return | +318% | 149 of 2,893 | top 5% |
| 10-year return | +319% | 538 of 2,202 | top 24% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 25.9% | 400 of 2,893 | top 14% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 1.24 | 18 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −62.3% | 972 of 2,187 | top 44% |
What has beaten HSBC on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). HSBC sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than HSBC with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- None of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than HSBC over the past 5 years with less volatility: nothing sits in the green region.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to HSBC. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than HSBC?
Investments that beat HSBC over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among HSBC's popular alternatives, CM, BBVA and MFG were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIB (banks) and NWG (banks) were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (32.9% and 34.1% volatility against 25.9%).
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than HSBC with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat HSBC over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks HSBC's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than HSBC's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× HSBC's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than HSBC's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with HSBC?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.37 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 5 shownThe investments people most often weigh against HSBC. 5 of 24 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.55 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.46 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +332% | 0.65 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +24.7% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | +339% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 4 shownEverything else in Banks and the categories next to it (Regional Banks, Capital Markets, Payment Processing, Asset Management), plus HSBC's specific themes. 4 of 118 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Higher return in most periods | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.39 | — | |
NWGNatWest Group plc · Banks | Higher return in most periods | +27.7% | 34.1% | 0.89 | −67.4% | +495% | 0.57 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +25.3% | 34.4% | 0.83 | −64.1% | +390% | 0.48 | — | ||
VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc. · Capital Markets | Higher return in most periods | +20.8% | 33.8% | 0.73 | −56.2% | +545% | 0.06 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 23 of 3,491 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.00 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.12 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.16 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.09 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +51.8% | 37.5% | 1.31 | −71.7% | +768% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.37 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.26 | 0.35% | ||
FTXLFirst Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF · Technology | Higher return in most periods | +27.4% | 38.8% | 0.82 | −43.9% | +1,077% | 0.24 | 0.60% | |
What these numbers mean for HSBC
- Annual return
- HSBC returned 33.1% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $41,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- HSBC's volatility over the past 5 years was 25.9%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, HSBC's return lands within 25.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- HSBC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.24, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so HSBC earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- HSBC's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 62.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 62.3% fall takes a 165% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, HSBC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.37 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against HSBC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a HSBC holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
HSBC against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against HSBC, compared period by period and year by year.
How do HSBC's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at HSBC, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 24 popular alternatives earned more than HSBC over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, HSBC returned 33.1% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (25.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than HSBC with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | +38.7% | 33.3% |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | +33.7% | 29.4% |
| MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | +33.6% | 30.6% |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | +33.2% | 29.4% |
| HSBC This pageHSBC Holdings plc | +33.1% | 25.9% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | +31.6% | 33.9% |
| UBS UBS Group AG | +25.4% | 30.4% |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | +24.7% | 31.1% |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | +22.1% | 37.4% |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | +20.3% | 32.1% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | +19.6% | 28.6% |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | +19.2% | 21.6% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | +18.5% | 34.1% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | +17.3% | 24.3% |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | +17.3% | 18.2% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | +16.0% | 28.8% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | +15.8% | 20.0% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | +15.1% | 29.4% |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | +13.6% | 21.4% |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | +13.1% | 29.5% |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | +12.8% | 19.9% |
| V Visa Inc. | +12.8% | 22.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | +12.4% | 23.8% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | +4.0% | 26.6% |
| EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | +1.5% | 20.1% |
Has HSBC consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares HSBC with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than HSBC helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Two of the 24 popular alternatives, CM and MFG, outperformed HSBC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than HSBC over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc (this page) | — | −10.1% | −5.9% | +2.3% | +19.8% | +47.7% | +201% | +318% | +319% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | — | $324B | — |
| CM QualifiedCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 4/5 short2/3 long | −2.0% | −3.3% | +4.3% | +25.8% | +44.4% | +261% | +141% | +395% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | — | $103B | — |
| MFG QualifiedMizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | −10.6% | +0.7% | +15.2% | +33.7% | +53.1% | +216% | +326% | +345% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | — | $121B | — |
| BBVA Banks - DiversifiedBanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −10.4% | +3.1% | +11.7% | +11.3% | +35.2% | +281% | +413% | +542% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | — | $142B | — |
| ING Banks - DiversifiedING Groep N.V. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −10.7% | +2.4% | +14.0% | +18.9% | +42.5% | +209% | +201% | +339% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | — | $94B | — |
| SAN Banks - DiversifiedBanco Santander, S.A. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −10.2% | −1.4% | +4.5% | +9.8% | +35.9% | +305% | +295% | +332% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | — | $194B | — |
| GS Financial - Capital MarketsThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −7.8% | −15.7% | −5.2% | −1.8% | +18.2% | +215% | +145% | +521% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | — | $258B | — |
| SMFG Banks - DiversifiedSumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | −7.9% | −1.3% | +15.9% | +28.3% | +53.5% | +181% | +327% | +474% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | — | $94B | — |
| MUFG Banks - DiversifiedMitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −6.9% | +1.8% | +19.6% | +36.5% | +41.3% | +184% | +319% | +483% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | — | $244B | — |
| MA Financial - Credit ServicesMastercard Incorporated | 3/5 short1/3 long | +9.5% | +13.5% | +20.5% | +10.9% | +10.3% | +64.3% | +79.2% | +541% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | — | $543B | — |
| JPM Banks - DiversifiedJPMorgan Chase & Co. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −4.3% | −0.6% | +6.8% | +5.0% | +13.0% | +150% | +122% | +537% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | — | $891B | — |
| V Financial - Credit ServicesVisa Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +9.9% | +13.0% | +30.0% | +18.0% | +19.0% | +78.2% | +82.5% | +429% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | — | $759B | — |
| RY Banks - DiversifiedRoyal Bank of Canada | 3/5 short1/3 long | −3.5% | −4.8% | +12.0% | +18.9% | +39.2% | +173% | +122% | +352% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | — | $276B | — |
| UBS Banks - DiversifiedUBS Group AG | 2/5 short1/3 long | −7.5% | −8.3% | +10.6% | +2.9% | +26.3% | +116% | +210% | +374% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | — | $145B | — |
| C Banks - DiversifiedCitigroup Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −9.3% | −4.3% | −7.0% | +4.8% | +26.0% | +238% | +102% | +234% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | — | $206B | — |
| MS Financial - Capital MarketsMorgan Stanley | 0/5 short1/3 long | −12.5% | −14.0% | −4.4% | +0.8% | +13.9% | +170% | +110% | +627% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | — | $285B | — |
| BCS Banks - DiversifiedBarclays PLC | 0/5 short1/3 long | −11.7% | −17.1% | −6.2% | −13.3% | +15.1% | +242% | +134% | +238% | 34.1% | 0.67 | −66.0% | — | $75B | — |
| DB Banks - RegionalDeutsche Bank AG | 0/5 short1/3 long | −17.1% | −8.6% | −1.6% | −17.0% | −3.1% | +244% | +171% | +165% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −72.7% | — | $60B | — |
| TD Banks - DiversifiedThe Toronto-Dominion Bank | 5/5 short0/3 long | −0.9% | +2.1% | +16.3% | +33.1% | +57.5% | +141% | +109% | +310% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | — | $206B | — |
| BNS Banks - DiversifiedThe Bank of Nova Scotia | 5/5 short0/3 long | −2.3% | +6.9% | +22.4% | +28.9% | +50.0% | +162% | +83.1% | +187% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | — | $112B | — |
| BMO Banks - DiversifiedBank of Montreal | 4/5 short0/3 long | −5.5% | −5.3% | +10.8% | +29.7% | +37.6% | +146% | +89.4% | +295% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | — | $116B | — |
| WFC Banks - DiversifiedWells Fargo & Company | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.0% | −4.3% | +1.4% | −12.3% | −2.4% | +119% | +85.0% | +141% | 29.5% | 0.57 | −64.5% | — | $248B | — |
| EWH Broad MarketiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 2/5 short0/3 long | −2.9% | −0.1% | −4.5% | +2.7% | +8.2% | +51.1% | +7.7% | +42.7% | 20.1% | 0.17 | −42.7% | 0.50% | $1.2B | — |
| LYG Banks - RegionalLloyds Banking Group plc | 1/5 short0/3 long | −8.1% | −6.7% | −2.5% | +1.7% | +22.4% | +207% | +152% | +213% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −66.5% | — | $80B | — |
| BAC Banks - DiversifiedBank of America Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.6% | −15.8% | −5.2% | −8.0% | −0.6% | +107% | +21.6% | +282% | 26.6% | 0.28 | −49.0% | — | $354B | — |
How did HSBC do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where HSBC ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with HSBC and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- HSBC finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 11 of its 27 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last four.
- Among its popular alternatives, RY came out ahead of HSBC most often, in 18 of the 27 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, HSBC finished in the top quarter in five of 27 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 9 of 25.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of HSBC; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places HSBC among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of HSBC | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSBC This pageHSBC Holdings plc | — | +67.9% | +34.5% | +39.3% | +7.8% | +20.8% | −31.7% | +1.5% | −16.1% | +35.9% | +9.9% | −11.5% | −10.2% | +8.5% | +45.9% | −22.2% | −7.5% | +22.2% | −38.0% | −4.0% | +18.9% | −1.5% | +12.6% | +52.3% | −5.2% | −15.3% | +6.5% | +15.8% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 27 | 9 of 25 | 11 of 25 | 4 of 25 | 5 of 25 | 17 of 25 | 23 of 25 | 23 of 25 | 10 of 25 | 5 of 25 | 13 of 25 | 16 of 25 | 17 of 25 | 25 of 25 | 6 of 25 | 15 of 25 | 19 of 25 | 16 of 25 | 6 of 24 | 11 of 24 | 16 of 21 | 19 of 21 | 14 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 7 of 21 | 12 of 20 | 13 of 19 | 14 of 16 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 16 of 27 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +33.5% |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 16 of 26 | +49.0% | +37.9% | +26.5% | −26.8% | +44.7% | +9.3% | +20.3% | −19.8% | +23.5% | +29.8% | −19.6% | +4.8% | +11.0% | +16.8% | −3.3% | +27.1% | +64.3% | −37.9% | −12.0% | +32.5% | +13.7% | +26.0% | +87.9% | −14.9% | +14.2% | +38.0% | — |
| MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 8 of 19 | +54.5% | +47.8% | +26.2% | +17.2% | +4.9% | −12.8% | +7.3% | −14.1% | +4.9% | −7.2% | +23.0% | −19.3% | +22.2% | +43.0% | −23.4% | +10.1% | −35.1% | −38.1% | −33.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 16 of 27 | +154% | +14.2% | +62.5% | +10.0% | +22.2% | −6.4% | +10.9% | −35.0% | +31.3% | −1.5% | −19.3% | −20.6% | +39.6% | +18.2% | −10.8% | −39.7% | +53.1% | −45.6% | +4.6% | +39.4% | +4.1% | +32.9% | +47.9% | −19.3% | −13.1% | +8.9% | +85.6% |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 14 of 27 | +91.3% | +12.2% | +32.0% | −4.4% | +55.4% | −21.6% | +20.6% | −39.4% | +36.7% | +11.1% | +6.4% | −7.4% | +47.6% | +32.5% | −26.8% | −0.2% | −11.7% | −69.6% | −8.2% | +31.9% | +20.8% | +36.1% | +48.7% | −31.3% | −34.4% | +35.1% | +25.1% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 13 of 27 | +165% | +14.9% | +46.4% | −6.8% | +10.2% | −19.6% | −2.2% | −28.5% | +33.3% | +12.3% | −37.9% | −0.4% | +27.4% | +22.8% | −20.2% | −30.2% | +91.8% | −52.3% | +20.2% | +47.1% | +10.5% | +6.8% | +77.6% | −11.3% | −19.8% | −7.6% | +53.6% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 15 of 26 | +56.6% | +52.0% | +15.9% | −7.9% | +47.6% | +17.4% | +40.5% | −33.5% | +7.4% | +34.9% | −5.8% | +10.8% | +40.8% | +43.4% | −45.6% | +0.5% | +103% | −60.4% | +8.6% | +57.4% | +23.9% | +6.5% | +46.3% | −26.0% | −12.8% | +14.1% | — |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 8 of 19 | +38.0% | +54.8% | +25.7% | +24.5% | +18.6% | −10.9% | +19.4% | −22.2% | +18.0% | +5.2% | +7.7% | −28.7% | +47.2% | +38.4% | −19.2% | +30.0% | −28.6% | −43.6% | −27.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 12 of 27 | +40.0% | +39.7% | +32.7% | +26.2% | +27.9% | −13.7% | +15.8% | −31.3% | +20.7% | +2.5% | +15.2% | −14.6% | +26.0% | +33.1% | −19.9% | +13.3% | −19.1% | −32.3% | −24.2% | −8.6% | +35.4% | +31.3% | +47.6% | −16.0% | −33.1% | −30.0% | −24.2% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 11 of 19 | +9.0% | +24.2% | +23.4% | −2.7% | +1.2% | +20.2% | +59.2% | +25.3% | +47.7% | +6.9% | +13.8% | +3.7% | +70.7% | +32.1% | +66.7% | −12.2% | +79.8% | −33.4% | +119% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 17 of 27 | +37.3% | +44.3% | +30.6% | −12.6% | +27.8% | −5.5% | +47.3% | −6.6% | +26.8% | +34.5% | +8.4% | +9.9% | +36.7% | +36.2% | −19.9% | +2.3% | +34.4% | −25.1% | −6.9% | +25.7% | +5.7% | +10.0% | +60.5% | −30.7% | −17.4% | −10.1% | +25.5% |
| V Visa Inc. | 10 of 17 | +11.8% | +22.3% | +26.3% | −3.4% | −0.3% | +17.1% | +43.3% | +16.5% | +47.2% | +1.4% | +19.1% | +18.7% | +48.0% | +50.5% | +45.4% | −18.9% | +68.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 18 of 27 | +46.3% | +23.8% | +12.2% | −8.0% | +34.1% | +8.4% | +20.2% | −12.9% | +23.9% | +31.8% | −19.3% | +6.7% | +16.0% | +23.3% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +89.3% | −39.4% | +10.7% | +26.0% | +50.7% | +15.9% | +33.6% | +15.8% | −0.9% | +58.5% | +54.8% |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 12 of 25 | +57.6% | +0.7% | +69.8% | +7.4% | +29.4% | +19.5% | +7.1% | −29.9% | +17.4% | −14.4% | +18.1% | −10.2% | +23.3% | +34.3% | −28.2% | +6.2% | +8.5% | −68.9% | −21.5% | +32.5% | +18.2% | +27.9% | +50.4% | +1.7% | −8.0% | — | — |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 15 of 27 | +70.4% | +41.9% | +19.0% | −22.1% | +0.9% | −19.7% | +57.9% | −28.5% | +27.0% | +15.9% | −4.1% | +3.9% | +31.8% | +50.5% | −44.3% | +42.9% | −50.6% | −75.9% | −44.8% | +19.6% | +4.6% | +2.8% | +41.6% | −20.4% | +0.1% | +23.6% | +79.9% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 12 of 27 | +45.2% | +39.7% | +13.9% | −10.3% | +46.6% | +38.1% | +32.7% | −22.8% | +26.6% | +36.1% | −16.7% | +25.0% | +65.4% | +27.6% | −43.9% | −7.5% | +88.3% | −68.8% | −22.1% | +46.3% | +4.6% | −2.0% | +48.4% | −27.0% | −28.1% | +12.3% | +80.3% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 15 of 27 | +96.5% | +76.2% | +6.0% | −21.9% | +31.6% | −12.8% | +31.9% | −29.3% | +0.5% | −12.8% | −11.4% | −14.9% | +16.1% | +61.7% | −31.9% | −4.7% | +80.0% | −73.6% | −27.2% | +44.2% | −4.0% | +31.1% | +55.0% | −23.6% | +7.7% | +16.0% | +62.3% |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 9 of 27 | +133% | +29.4% | +21.4% | −5.9% | +14.7% | +40.1% | −2.9% | −56.7% | +6.4% | −25.0% | −17.7% | −36.4% | +10.9% | +19.7% | −26.1% | −20.1% | +75.4% | −65.5% | −0.6% | +42.0% | +12.3% | +9.8% | +83.6% | −34.3% | −22.1% | 0.0% | +54.6% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 18 of 27 | +85.3% | −13.4% | +4.5% | −12.2% | +41.3% | +5.6% | +17.5% | −12.1% | +22.9% | +30.9% | −14.9% | +5.0% | +16.1% | +16.8% | +4.1% | +22.7% | +85.4% | −46.8% | +20.4% | +16.1% | +30.7% | +29.7% | +61.4% | −11.7% | −7.2% | +11.2% | +52.7% |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 16 of 26 | +45.1% | +17.5% | +6.0% | −28.8% | +40.6% | +1.7% | +17.5% | −19.2% | +20.5% | +43.7% | −25.1% | −4.2% | +11.5% | +21.0% | −9.6% | +27.1% | +82.6% | −44.4% | +16.6% | +16.8% | +21.4% | +40.4% | +59.9% | +232% | +17.5% | +25.4% | — |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 18 of 27 | +39.6% | +3.0% | +14.6% | −12.4% | +46.9% | +3.3% | +23.9% | −14.9% | +15.4% | +32.9% | −16.8% | +10.4% | +13.7% | +17.3% | −0.3% | +13.7% | +121% | −51.9% | −0.4% | +9.4% | +20.4% | +21.0% | +62.9% | +23.0% | −9.6% | +62.5% | +44.8% |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 13 of 27 | +35.6% | +46.5% | +22.9% | −11.9% | +61.1% | −41.6% | +21.4% | −21.8% | +13.2% | +4.7% | +1.8% | +24.1% | +36.7% | +27.3% | −9.6% | +15.7% | −6.3% | +1.7% | −12.1% | +16.9% | +4.5% | +9.0% | +29.5% | +10.3% | −20.2% | +40.5% | +81.9% |
| EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 13 of 27 | +34.5% | −0.1% | −13.8% | −6.8% | −3.4% | +4.2% | +10.8% | −8.7% | +36.5% | +1.3% | −1.1% | +3.3% | +9.5% | +29.2% | −16.2% | +24.1% | +55.1% | −50.3% | +39.5% | +29.2% | +7.3% | +23.7% | +36.4% | −17.4% | −18.1% | −17.6% | −26.0% |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 9 of 24 | +104% | +20.2% | +14.5% | −9.7% | +34.6% | −36.5% | +36.9% | −28.4% | +26.8% | −25.9% | −4.4% | −12.7% | +66.1% | +104% | −61.7% | +25.4% | −27.5% | −77.5% | −11.6% | +42.9% | −1.5% | +22.5% | +25.3% | −33.0% | — | — | — |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 15 of 27 | +28.0% | +33.9% | +4.9% | −23.8% | +49.6% | −11.6% | +46.1% | −15.0% | +35.7% | +33.4% | −4.8% | +15.7% | +34.5% | +109% | −58.1% | −11.2% | +7.6% | −63.1% | −18.9% | +20.8% | +2.4% | +21.5% | +20.1% | +14.6% | +42.7% | −4.5% | +27.3% |
Risk and diversification
How HSBC has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were HSBC's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents HSBC's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1995, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of HSBC's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: HSBC fell 41.2% from August 1997 to January 1998, while the S&P 500 slipped only 1.1%.
- The slowest recovery came after HSBC fell 74.5% from October 2007 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until April 2024, 15 years later.
Green means HSBC fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | HSBC fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −74.5% | −51.6% | Oct 2007 | Mar 2009 | 17 months | Apr 2024 | 15.1 years |
| Dot-com bust | −41.4% | −27.7% | Jan 2001 | Sep 2001 | 8 months | Oct 2003 | 2.1 years |
| No named crash | −41.2% | −1.1% | Aug 1997 | Jan 1998 | 5 months | Jul 1999 | 18 months |
| No named crash | −22.4% | −6.7% | Dec 1999 | Mar 2000 | 3 months | Aug 2000 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −21.8% | −14.6% | Mar 2025 | Apr 2025 | 1 month | May 2025 | 1 month |
How did HSBC do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far HSBC, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, RY held up best, falling less than HSBC in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- HSBC fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when HSBC fell 20.5% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than HSBC.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSBC This pageHSBC Holdings plc | — | −7.3% | −31.8% | −20.5% | −13.1% | −4.6% | −30.8% | −25.1% | 0.0% | −73.8% | −41.4% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 4 of 10 | −7.0% | −36.2% | −43.6% | −22.2% | −5.9% | −25.3% | −12.9% | 0.0% | −71.8% | −39.8% |
| MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −9.7% | −24.1% | −29.6% | −18.1% | −4.2% | −34.9% | −17.7% | −1.0% | −72.2% | — |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 0 of 10 | −10.9% | −39.6% | −47.9% | −22.7% | −5.4% | −41.0% | −32.7% | 0.0% | −75.7% | −55.9% |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 0 of 10 | −10.7% | −43.4% | −56.9% | −24.1% | −5.8% | −35.4% | −47.4% | −3.6% | −93.0% | −66.4% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 0 of 10 | −11.4% | −41.0% | −48.1% | −19.0% | −6.0% | −44.7% | −33.2% | −0.9% | −76.1% | −58.4% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −9.7% | −30.5% | −42.8% | −33.3% | −5.3% | −31.2% | −34.3% | 0.0% | −78.8% | −54.7% |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −9.2% | −24.7% | −32.2% | −23.2% | −4.5% | −44.2% | −19.8% | −2.2% | −70.9% | — |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −9.5% | −33.4% | −33.0% | −27.0% | −6.7% | −45.1% | −20.7% | −0.3% | −65.5% | −65.1% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 5 of 9 | −4.0% | −28.2% | −41.0% | −21.9% | −5.8% | −20.4% | −13.8% | −3.1% | −62.7% | — |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 3 of 10 | −5.4% | −37.9% | −42.5% | −21.3% | −5.6% | −22.0% | −32.1% | −0.1% | −67.7% | −74.0% |
| V Visa Inc. | 4 of 8 | −3.5% | −24.1% | −36.4% | −19.1% | −5.8% | −15.8% | −11.5% | −0.8% | — | — |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 6 of 10 | −3.8% | −26.0% | −40.0% | −17.1% | −5.7% | −23.1% | −21.8% | 0.0% | −63.1% | −21.6% |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 0 of 9 | −9.5% | −32.5% | −42.3% | −28.5% | −8.2% | −36.7% | −39.7% | −0.9% | −87.5% | — |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 0 of 10 | −11.7% | −39.2% | −54.8% | −33.1% | −6.7% | −40.3% | −42.6% | −1.0% | −97.7% | −52.7% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 0 of 10 | −8.2% | −32.4% | −50.6% | −24.6% | −6.7% | −43.9% | −47.7% | 0.0% | −86.2% | −72.0% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 1 of 10 | −10.2% | −48.1% | −57.1% | −22.9% | −4.1% | −50.6% | −44.9% | −4.8% | −93.9% | −38.4% |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 0 of 10 | −11.6% | −54.2% | −48.6% | −36.3% | −9.3% | −54.8% | −46.8% | 0.0% | −82.7% | −64.9% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 5 of 10 | −6.7% | −29.0% | −41.0% | −20.9% | −5.5% | −18.1% | −19.6% | 0.0% | −63.4% | −44.1% |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 5 of 10 | −4.6% | −35.4% | −43.0% | −17.7% | −6.1% | −24.3% | −19.8% | 0.0% | −63.8% | −23.6% |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 6 of 10 | −5.5% | −30.5% | −49.4% | −23.5% | −6.2% | −18.9% | −16.4% | 0.0% | −68.5% | −26.5% |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 3 of 10 | −12.4% | −36.3% | −47.1% | −20.1% | −13.5% | −20.9% | −21.1% | −1.2% | −79.0% | −29.2% |
| EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 5 of 10 | −3.0% | −25.2% | −24.4% | −12.3% | −6.3% | −23.2% | −26.4% | 0.0% | −63.6% | −48.6% |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 0 of 9 | −7.8% | −40.5% | −53.4% | −23.3% | −4.3% | −34.6% | −41.6% | −4.5% | −94.8% | — |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 1 of 10 | −12.4% | −38.7% | −47.8% | −26.4% | −6.9% | −37.8% | −45.2% | −0.6% | −93.4% | −36.3% |
How closely does HSBC move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares HSBC with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, HSBC captured 79% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 53% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.58. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only MUFG, SMFG and MFG had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than HSBC's 1.49, out of 24 popular alternatives with the same record.
- MFG took just 42% of the S&P 500's losses, against 53% for HSBC, while still keeping 75% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than HSBC's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSBC This pageHSBC Holdings plc | 79% | 53% | 1.49 | 0.58 |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 84% | 42% | 2.01 | 0.66 |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 84% | 43% | 1.94 | 0.65 |
| MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 75% | 42% | 1.81 | 0.54 |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 121% | 97% | 1.25 | 1.11 |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 105% | 88% | 1.20 | 0.95 |
| V Visa Inc. | 93% | 79% | 1.18 | 0.87 |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 117% | 103% | 1.14 | 1.09 |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 97% | 88% | 1.11 | 0.88 |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 101% | 92% | 1.10 | 1.02 |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 89% | 80% | 1.10 | 0.88 |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 142% | 137% | 1.04 | 1.39 |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 108% | 106% | 1.02 | 1.07 |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 136% | 133% | 1.02 | 1.39 |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 116% | 120% | 0.97 | 1.18 |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 104% | 112% | 0.93 | 1.12 |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 136% | 155% | 0.88 | 1.36 |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 127% | 146% | 0.87 | 1.36 |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 113% | 131% | 0.86 | 1.26 |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 102% | 118% | 0.86 | 1.21 |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 106% | 130% | 0.82 | 1.20 |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 97% | 120% | 0.81 | 1.05 |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 131% | 165% | 0.80 | 1.49 |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 96% | 129% | 0.75 | 1.13 |
| EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 54% | 84% | 0.65 | 0.54 |
What diversifies HSBC?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with HSBC's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing HSBC with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in HSBC into CAH would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+38.7% for HSBC alone, +39.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and HDV have moved largely independently of HSBC over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in seven of the 11 calendar years in which HSBC lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which HSBC lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% HSBC and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc (this page) | 1.00 | +318% | 1.24 | −31.7% | −16.1% | −11.5% | −10.2% | −22.2% | −7.5% | −38.0% | −4.0% | −1.5% | −5.2% | −15.3% | 25.2% | +38.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.35 | +225% | 1.34 | +3.9% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | 21.2% | +36.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.40 | +101% | 1.04 | −13.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | +23.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.5% | +34.3% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.46 | +83.3% | 1.00 | −6.5% | −3.0% | −0.3% | +12.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.6% | +33.4% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.26 | +323% | 0.97 | +55.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +30.2% | +6.8% | +19.0% | −44.7% | +6.0% | +10.8% | −47.0% | −14.6% | 23.0% | +39.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.24 | +126% | 0.96 | +24.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +4.9% | +30.4% | +17.8% | — | — | 21.3% | +35.1% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.15 | +136% | 0.93 | +28.2% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.1% | +36.0% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.31 | +177% | 0.93 | −32.7% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +2.8% | +21.9% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +40.1% | −14.8% | −18.2% | 22.3% | +36.3% |
| VTV Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 0.46 | +76.6% | 0.90 | +2.3% | −5.5% | −1.0% | +13.2% | +1.1% | +14.5% | −35.9% | −0.1% | +7.2% | — | — | 21.6% | +33.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc (this page) | 1.00 | +318% | 1.24 | −31.7% | −16.1% | −11.5% | −10.2% | −22.2% | −7.5% | −38.0% | −4.0% | −1.5% | −5.2% | −15.3% | 25.2% | +38.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.00 | +479% | 1.55 | +10.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −39.6% | −9.8% | +18.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | 20.8% | +39.8% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.16 | +3,143% | 1.47 | −2.4% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +12.9% | −24.4% | +2.8% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −25.2% | −65.1% | −25.6% | 24.9% | +54.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.05 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +6.7% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −10.4% | −17.0% | +8.7% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +20.1% | −9.4% | +73.7% | 22.4% | +50.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.12 | +413% | 1.44 | +27.1% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +11.8% | +13.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | +64.9% | −27.2% | +4.9% | 21.4% | +39.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.09 | +690% | 1.41 | −27.4% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.7% | +42.2% |
Common questions
What was HSBC's worst drawdown?
HSBC's deepest decline since it began trading in 1995 was 74.5%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It took about 15 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were HSBC's best and worst years?
Over 27 full calendar years, HSBC's best year was 2025, when it returned 67.9%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -38.0%.
Is there a better investment than HSBC?
Among HSBC's popular alternatives, CM, BBVA and MFG were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CIB (banks) and NWG (banks) were ahead of HSBC in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (32.9% and 34.1% volatility against 25.9%).
Is HSBC more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. HSBC's volatility over the past 5 years was 25.9%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, HSBC's return lands within 25.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is HSBC's Sharpe ratio?
HSBC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 1.24, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so HSBC earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is HSBC with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, HSBC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.37 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against HSBC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a HSBC holding.
What are the best alternatives to HSBC?
Of the 24 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed HSBC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CM and MFG.
Did HSBC outperform the S&P 500?
HSBC finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 11 of 27 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +67.9%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did HSBC do in stock market crashes?
HSBC fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when HSBC fell 20.5% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies HSBC?
These had a low correlation with HSBC over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.35), EMLP (correlation 0.40) and HDV (correlation 0.46); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.00), CLS (correlation 0.16) and FIX (correlation 0.05). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than HSBC's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of HSBC's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.