Relative Intelligence · Capital Markets

How Goldman Sachs Group (GS) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on GS alone. It places GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where GS stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: GS's full trading record, from May 1999 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, GS fell 15.7% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. The slide is GS's own: it is 22.8% below its high, against 1.3% for the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is GS's own: it fell 15.7% over the past 3 months while the capital markets ETF IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF) fell 5.9%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its capital market peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) fell 0.6%, while EVR (Evercore) fell 24.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsGS finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. GS lagged its capital market peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termGS turned $10,000 into $62,100 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. GS's 10-year return of 521% puts it ahead of 87% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, GS has typically fallen 1.6 times as far as the S&P 500. On the flip side, in the 2022 bear market, GS held up better than JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.), BAC and MS; only RJF (Raymond James Financial) and PJT fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationGS is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.73 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.76 with the total US market, more closely than 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million. When the S&P 500 had a down month, GS usually fell with it (18 of 22 months). By year ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- VIRT (Virtu Financial) was ahead of GS in most short and long periods.
- Nearby categories and themes
- BNY (Bank of New York Mellon, banks) and CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, capital markets) earned more than GS with less volatility over the past 5 years. BNY returned 22.7% a year at 24.4% volatility, against 19.6% a year at 28.6%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 41 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than GS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT (Walmart), XOM (Exxonmobil) and ABBV (AbbVie).
How much would $10,000 in GS have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in GS over the past 27 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of GS over the same span and GS's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in GS at the end of September 1999 would have grown to $215,124 by September 2026, more than the $95,018 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of GS, and BAP finished highest, at $829,404.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1999 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 317 of the 1,166 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of GS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BAP$829,404+8,194% total · +17.8% a year
- SF$673,462+6,635% total · +16.9% a year
- PGR$593,751+5,838% total · +16.3% a year
- CM$408,092+3,981% total · +14.7% a year
- RJF$390,746+3,807% total · +14.5% a year
- GS$215,124+2,051% total · +12.0% a year
- JPM$141,770+1,318% total · +10.3% a year
- OPY$135,582+1,256% total · +10.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$95,018+850% total · +8.7% a year
- MS$87,725+777% total · +8.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 425 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of GS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- HSBC$51,297+413% total · +38.7% a year
- MUFG$44,537+345% total · +34.8% a year
- BAP$44,181+342% total · +34.6% a year
- GWW$33,303+233% total · +27.2% a year
- BNY$31,954+220% total · +26.2% a year
- OPY$28,799+188% total · +23.6% a year
- VIRT$26,921+169% total · +21.9% a year
- GS$26,885+169% total · +21.9% a year
- JPM$22,905+129% total · +18.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
GS at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- GS is still 22.8% below its all-time high.
- GS's deepest decline since it began trading in 1999 was 78.8%, from October 2007 to November 2008. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 26 full calendar years, GS's best was 2009, when it returned 103%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 60.4%. It lost money in seven of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $258B
- Industry
- Financial - Capital Markets
- Price history from
- May 1999
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +18.2%total return
- Past 3 years
- +215%+46.6% a year
- Past 5 years
- +145%+19.6% a year
- Past 10 years
- +521%+20.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +103%2009
- Worst calendar year
- −60.4%2008
- Losing years
- 7 of 26full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 28.6%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.77return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −78.8%Oct 2007 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −22.8%below the peak
GS against the whole market
Where GS ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does GS rank among all stocks?
This section ranks GS on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how GS stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), GS ranks in the top 11% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | GS | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +18.2% | 1,303 of 3,287 | top 40% |
| 3-year return | +215% | 358 of 3,017 | top 12% |
| 5-year return | +145% | 468 of 2,893 | top 16% |
| 10-year return | +521% | 289 of 2,202 | top 13% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 28.6% | 603 of 2,893 | top 21% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.77 | 325 of 2,893 | top 11% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −48.8% | 415 of 2,187 | top 19% |
What has beaten GS on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). GS sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than GS with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 29 stocks and 12 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than GS over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half GS's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 14% less than GS's 28.6%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.77 for GS.
- None of GS's popular alternatives made it, but HSBC (banks) did: 33.1% a year at 25.9% volatility, 10% less than GS's 28.6%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to GS; faint dots are 27 more of the 41 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than GS?
Investments that beat GS over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among GS's popular alternatives, VIRT was ahead of GS in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, BNY (banks) and CBOE (capital markets) earned more than GS with less volatility over the past 5 years. BNY returned 22.7% a year at 24.4% volatility, against 19.6% a year at 28.6%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 41 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than GS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT, XOM and ABBV.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat GS over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks GS's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than GS follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than GS's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× GS's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than GS's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with GS?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +521% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.73 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against GS. 1 of 21 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc. · Capital Markets | Higher return in most periods | +20.8% | 33.8% | 0.73 | −56.2% | +545% | 0.39 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Capital Markets and the categories next to it (Investment Banking & Brokerage, Financial Data, Banks, Asset Management), plus GS's specific themes. 19 of 119 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.71 | — | ||
CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.21 | — | |
BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.45 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatility | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.43 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.24 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.58 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 155 of 3,493 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.13 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.42 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.14 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.10 | — | ||
RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.46 | — | |
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.27 | 0.48% | |
FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.44 | 0.19% | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.37 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for GS
- Annual return
- GS returned 19.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $24,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- GS's volatility over the past 5 years was 28.6%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, GS's return lands within 28.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- GS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.77, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so GS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- GS's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 48.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 48.8% fall takes a 95.1% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, GS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.73 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against GS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a GS holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 41 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than GS with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 37 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with GS | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.13 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.42 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.14 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.10 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.32 | — | |
| 6 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.27 | 0.48% |
| 7 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.59 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.36 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.25 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.32 | — | |
| 11 | Same or nearby category | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.71 | — | |
| 12 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.54 | — |
| 13 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.24 | — | |
| 14 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Same or nearby category | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.21 | — |
| 15 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.44 | 0.19% |
| 16 | EPUiShares MSCI Peru and Global Exposure ETF · International | Whole market | +29.5% | 24.9% | 1.17 | −51.0% | +275% | 0.45 | 0.59% |
| 17 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.49 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.23 | — | |
| 19 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.35 | 0.45% |
| 20 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.17 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.30 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.42 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.36 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.34 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.53 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.54 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | 0.37 | 0.08% | |
| 28 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.14 | 0.80% |
| 29 | Same or nearby category | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.43 | — | |
| 30 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.33 | — |
| 31 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.58 | — |
| 32 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.49 | — |
| 33 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.24 | — |
| 34 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.50 | — |
| 35 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.48 | — |
| 36 | IYEiShares U.S. Energy ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.1% | 25.2% | 0.89 | −68.6% | +159% | 0.39 | 0.37% |
| 37 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.53 | 0.95% |
GS against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against GS, compared period by period and year by year.
How do GS's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at GS, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 21 popular alternatives earned more than GS over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 14 of the 21 popular alternatives earned less than GS over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, GS returned 19.6% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (28.6% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than GS with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | +20.8% | 33.8% |
| GS This pageThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | +19.6% | 28.6% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | +17.3% | 24.3% |
| OPY Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. | +17.2% | 33.4% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | +16.0% | 28.8% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | +15.1% | 29.4% |
| PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | +13.5% | 35.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| CME CME Group Inc. | +11.2% | 20.8% |
| EVR Evercore Inc. | +11.0% | 36.3% |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | +10.4% | 27.9% |
| PJT PJT Partners Inc. | +10.2% | 31.1% |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | +8.4% | 31.0% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | +7.1% | 27.1% |
| HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc. | +6.6% | 28.7% |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | +5.7% | 39.8% |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | +5.4% | 36.5% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | +5.4% | 21.8% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | +4.0% | 26.6% |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | +0.4% | 39.8% |
| PWP Perella Weinberg Partners | +0.3% | 45.2% |
| MC Moelis & Company | −0.5% | 37.6% |
| LAZ Lazard Inc | −2.0% | 38.2% |
Has GS consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares GS with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than GS helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- VIRT outperformed GS in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Only one of the 21 popular alternatives, VIRT, outperformed GS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- JPM earned more for the risk it took than GS (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than GS over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (this page) | — | −7.8% | −15.7% | −5.2% | −1.8% | +18.2% | +215% | +145% | +521% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | — | $258B | — |
| VIRT QualifiedVirtu Financial, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −1.5% | +1.1% | +13.8% | +77.5% | +76.5% | +243% | +158% | +545% | 33.8% | 0.73 | −56.2% | — | $5.0B | — |
| JPM Banks - DiversifiedJPMorgan Chase & Co. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −4.3% | −0.6% | +6.8% | +5.0% | +13.0% | +150% | +122% | +537% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | — | $891B | — |
| OPY Financial - Capital MarketsOppenheimer Holdings Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −15.5% | −6.8% | −11.0% | +39.4% | +50.8% | +201% | +121% | +743% | 33.4% | 0.64 | −54.9% | — | $1.1B | — |
| MS Financial - Capital MarketsMorgan Stanley | 3/5 short1/3 long | −12.5% | −14.0% | −4.4% | +0.8% | +13.9% | +170% | +110% | +627% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | — | $285B | — |
| C Banks - DiversifiedCitigroup Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −9.3% | −4.3% | −7.0% | +4.8% | +26.0% | +238% | +102% | +234% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | — | $206B | — |
| HLI Investment - Banking & Investment ServicesHoulihan Lokey, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −1.7% | −6.3% | −18.2% | −25.1% | −31.2% | +35.0% | +37.8% | +549% | 28.7% | 0.37 | −40.3% | — | $9.1B | — |
| KKR Asset ManagementKKR & Co. Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −11.5% | −7.8% | −13.8% | −30.4% | −25.2% | +65.7% | +31.8% | +653% | 39.8% | 0.34 | −49.4% | — | $80B | — |
| BX Asset ManagementBlackstone Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −12.7% | −9.8% | −12.8% | −28.3% | −28.4% | +28.6% | +2.1% | +628% | 39.8% | 0.21 | −49.3% | — | $127B | — |
| PIPR Investment - Banking & Investment ServicesPiper Sandler Companies | 0/5 short1/3 long | −13.2% | −15.5% | −29.3% | −24.9% | −20.5% | +103% | +88.4% | +762% | 35.5% | 0.54 | −60.0% | — | $4.5B | — |
| CME Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesCME Group Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +7.2% | +21.0% | +3.8% | +13.2% | +14.6% | +57.7% | +70.1% | +319% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | — | $106B | — |
| BLK Asset ManagementBlackRock, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +3.5% | +7.6% | +8.8% | +5.7% | −0.6% | +96.3% | +41.1% | +313% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | — | $175B | — |
| ICE Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesIntercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +2.1% | +12.4% | −0.6% | +0.1% | +3.5% | +52.4% | +30.0% | +240% | 21.8% | 0.35 | −34.3% | — | $89B | — |
| RJF Asset ManagementRaymond James Financial, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −5.7% | −7.4% | +2.7% | −4.1% | −4.5% | +69.5% | +64.2% | +358% | 27.9% | 0.50 | −45.6% | — | $30B | — |
| JEF Financial - Capital MarketsJefferies Financial Group Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.9% | −17.8% | −3.9% | −27.5% | −14.2% | +51.7% | +30.3% | +249% | 36.5% | 0.33 | −54.4% | — | $8.5B | — |
| LAZ Financial - Capital MarketsLazard Inc | 2/5 short0/3 long | +0.5% | −11.9% | −22.4% | −24.0% | −23.6% | +47.7% | −9.7% | +73.5% | 38.2% | 0.14 | −60.0% | — | $3.6B | — |
| EVR Financial - Capital MarketsEvercore Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −6.3% | −24.2% | −29.2% | −27.6% | −20.6% | +102% | +68.8% | +499% | 36.3% | 0.47 | −67.4% | — | $9.7B | — |
| SF Financial - Capital MarketsStifel Financial Corp | 1/5 short0/3 long | −11.7% | −13.4% | −17.4% | −20.8% | −9.0% | +86.5% | +49.5% | +374% | 31.0% | 0.41 | −51.8% | — | $10B | — |
| PWP Financial - Capital MarketsPerella Weinberg Partners | 1/5 short0/3 long | −5.4% | −18.8% | −40.3% | −26.7% | −33.5% | +40.2% | +1.7% | — | 45.2% | 0.23 | −60.5% | — | $1.4B | — |
| PJT Investment - Banking & Investment ServicesPJT Partners Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −9.5% | −16.6% | −13.2% | −18.9% | −22.5% | +88.7% | +62.6% | +477% | 31.1% | 0.47 | −58.4% | — | $3.5B | — |
| MC Financial - Capital MarketsMoelis & Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | −11.1% | −18.9% | −20.0% | −22.1% | −18.4% | +49.4% | −2.3% | +343% | 37.6% | 0.17 | −58.3% | — | $4.0B | — |
| BAC Banks - DiversifiedBank of America Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.6% | −15.8% | −5.2% | −8.0% | −0.6% | +107% | +21.6% | +282% | 26.6% | 0.28 | −49.0% | — | $354B | — |
How did GS do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2000, along with where GS ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with GS and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, GS finished in the top quarter in six of 26 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 2 of 22.
- GS finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 26 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, BX came out ahead of GS most often, in 12 of the 18 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of GS; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places GS among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of GS | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS This pageThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | — | +56.6% | +52.0% | +15.9% | −7.9% | +47.6% | +17.4% | +40.5% | −33.5% | +7.4% | +34.9% | −5.8% | +10.8% | +40.8% | +43.4% | −45.6% | +0.5% | +103% | −60.4% | +8.6% | +57.4% | +23.9% | +6.5% | +46.3% | −26.0% | −12.8% | +14.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 26 | 2 of 22 | 11 of 22 | 16 of 22 | 4 of 22 | 10 of 22 | 15 of 21 | 7 of 21 | 21 of 21 | 21 of 21 | 4 of 21 | 11 of 18 | 9 of 17 | 11 of 17 | 4 of 17 | 16 of 17 | 11 of 17 | 5 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 8 of 15 | 4 of 14 | 4 of 12 | 9 of 12 | 5 of 11 | 8 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 7 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 26 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% |
| VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −4.2% | +83.0% | +4.6% | −26.5% | +18.6% | +64.3% | −34.8% | +46.0% | +21.4% | −25.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 10 of 26 | +37.3% | +44.3% | +30.6% | −12.6% | +27.8% | −5.5% | +47.3% | −6.6% | +26.8% | +34.5% | +8.4% | +9.9% | +36.7% | +36.2% | −19.9% | +2.3% | +34.4% | −25.1% | −6.9% | +25.7% | +5.7% | +10.0% | +60.5% | −30.7% | −17.4% | −10.1% |
| OPY Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. | 14 of 26 | +15.5% | +57.3% | −0.9% | −7.2% | +52.7% | +20.4% | +9.4% | −3.3% | +47.6% | +10.2% | −23.7% | −4.5% | +47.0% | +10.3% | −37.3% | −19.8% | +164% | −69.0% | +28.1% | +69.7% | −20.3% | −23.7% | +36.0% | −9.4% | +19.2% | +64.2% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 8 of 26 | +45.2% | +39.7% | +13.9% | −10.3% | +46.6% | +38.1% | +32.7% | −22.8% | +26.6% | +36.1% | −16.7% | +25.0% | +65.4% | +27.6% | −43.9% | −7.5% | +88.3% | −68.8% | −22.1% | +46.3% | +4.6% | −2.0% | +48.4% | −27.0% | −28.1% | +12.3% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 11 of 26 | +70.4% | +41.9% | +19.0% | −22.1% | +0.9% | −19.7% | +57.9% | −28.5% | +27.0% | +15.9% | −4.1% | +3.9% | +31.8% | +50.5% | −44.3% | +42.9% | −50.6% | −75.9% | −44.8% | +19.6% | +4.6% | +2.8% | +41.6% | −20.4% | +0.1% | +23.6% |
| HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc. | 5 of 10 | +1.6% | +47.0% | +40.7% | −13.9% | +57.0% | +40.6% | +36.4% | −17.2% | +49.2% | +21.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | 11 of 18 | −13.3% | +79.6% | +80.5% | −37.0% | +85.8% | +41.1% | +51.5% | −4.3% | +41.8% | +3.4% | −28.0% | +4.0% | +73.8% | +25.6% | −5.3% | +70.4% | +153% | −81.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 12 of 18 | −7.8% | +35.1% | +82.8% | −40.0% | +107% | +19.8% | +96.3% | +0.1% | +27.4% | −1.5% | −5.0% | +13.9% | +114% | +15.7% | +3.4% | +12.7% | +117% | −67.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 13 of 22 | +15.5% | +74.3% | +37.8% | −23.4% | +85.3% | +29.7% | +33.6% | −10.7% | +28.2% | +79.7% | −30.5% | +46.8% | +23.2% | +58.8% | −42.2% | −30.9% | +27.3% | −14.2% | −28.9% | +61.4% | −15.8% | +15.5% | — | — | — | — |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 11 of 23 | +19.8% | +15.4% | +31.3% | −22.9% | +29.5% | −6.3% | +9.7% | +32.1% | +32.4% | +33.9% | +4.4% | +18.3% | +64.0% | +11.4% | −22.7% | −2.7% | +64.3% | −68.8% | +35.3% | +39.5% | +61.8% | +219% | +67.5% | — | — | — |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 15 of 26 | +6.6% | +29.3% | +17.9% | −20.4% | +29.4% | +47.2% | +31.9% | −21.6% | +38.2% | +14.6% | −2.4% | +15.7% | +57.0% | +19.8% | −3.6% | −15.9% | +76.6% | −37.0% | +45.1% | +41.8% | +42.4% | +47.6% | +35.9% | −5.5% | −0.7% | +144% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 11 of 20 | +9.9% | +17.5% | +27.1% | −23.9% | +19.9% | +26.2% | +24.5% | +8.1% | +26.6% | +11.5% | +18.3% | −1.3% | +82.2% | +2.7% | +1.2% | +6.1% | +36.2% | −57.2% | +78.4% | +197% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 12 of 26 | +4.7% | +40.8% | +6.1% | +8.3% | +59.5% | +8.7% | +22.8% | −15.7% | +30.0% | +21.3% | +2.5% | +11.1% | +37.2% | +26.3% | −3.7% | +39.8% | +41.8% | −46.4% | +8.7% | +22.1% | +22.9% | +24.7% | +28.9% | −15.8% | +3.1% | +89.7% |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | 12 of 26 | −18.8% | +98.9% | +27.8% | −8.5% | +61.9% | +18.9% | +35.1% | −33.2% | +15.5% | +35.5% | −21.5% | −20.1% | +23.5% | +5.8% | −21.2% | +23.8% | +20.1% | −58.0% | +67.9% | +19.9% | +3.0% | +51.6% | +24.4% | +32.2% | −17.9% | +54.6% |
| LAZ Lazard Inc | 8 of 20 | −1.6% | +54.9% | +6.9% | −16.2% | +7.4% | +12.1% | +13.8% | −25.4% | +36.2% | −1.1% | −5.8% | +13.2% | +56.0% | +19.0% | −32.7% | +5.5% | +29.4% | −26.1% | −13.4% | +49.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EVR Evercore Inc. | 11 of 19 | +24.3% | +64.3% | +60.6% | −17.6% | +26.3% | +51.7% | +7.4% | −18.9% | +33.4% | +30.2% | +5.6% | −10.7% | +102% | +17.0% | −19.6% | +14.3% | +150% | −39.7% | −40.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | 17 of 26 | +20.9% | +57.2% | +22.7% | −14.8% | +41.4% | +27.1% | +48.8% | −29.5% | +20.0% | +17.9% | −16.9% | +6.4% | +49.9% | −0.3% | −22.5% | +4.8% | +29.1% | +30.7% | +34.2% | +4.2% | +79.5% | +43.1% | +75.7% | +7.1% | −5.9% | +17.4% |
| PWP Perella Weinberg Partners | 2 of 5 | −26.4% | +98.1% | +28.4% | −21.2% | +15.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PJT PJT Partners Inc. | 6 of 10 | +6.6% | +56.2% | +40.0% | +0.9% | +2.6% | +67.3% | +17.0% | −14.6% | +48.4% | +10.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MC Moelis & Company | 5 of 11 | −3.1% | +37.1% | +54.9% | −35.2% | +49.1% | +62.8% | +0.8% | −22.5% | +51.1% | +30.5% | −13.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 10 of 26 | +28.0% | +33.9% | +4.9% | −23.8% | +49.6% | −11.6% | +46.1% | −15.0% | +35.7% | +33.4% | −4.8% | +15.7% | +34.5% | +109% | −58.1% | −11.2% | +7.6% | −63.1% | −18.9% | +20.8% | +2.4% | +21.5% | +20.1% | +14.6% | +42.7% | −4.5% |
Risk and diversification
How GS has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were GS's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents GS's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1999, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of GS's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after GS fell 78.8% from October 2007 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until December 2016, eight years later.
Green means GS fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | GS fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −78.8% | −50.2% | Oct 2007 | Nov 2008 | 13 months | Dec 2016 | 8.1 years |
| Dot-com bust | −54.7% | −46.2% | Sep 2000 | Oct 2002 | 2.1 years | Nov 2005 | 3.1 years |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −48.8% | −16.4% | Mar 2018 | Mar 2020 | 2 years | Dec 2020 | 9 months |
| Dot-com bust | −42.4% | −10.1% | Mar 2000 | May 2000 | 2 months | Aug 2000 | 3 months |
| 2022 bear market | −32.8% | −19.9% | Nov 2021 | Jun 2022 | 7 months | Mar 2024 | 21 months |
How did GS do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far GS, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- GS fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when GS fell 78.8% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, VIRT held up best, falling less than GS in five of the six crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than GS.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS This pageThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | — | −9.7% | −30.5% | −42.8% | −33.3% | −5.3% | −31.2% | −34.3% | 0.0% | −78.8% | −54.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | 5 of 6 | −8.7% | −44.4% | −21.7% | −9.6% | −3.4% | −20.9% | — | — | — | — |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 5 of 10 | −5.4% | −37.9% | −42.5% | −21.3% | −5.6% | −22.0% | −32.1% | −0.1% | −67.7% | −74.0% |
| OPY Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. | 2 of 10 | −9.9% | −41.4% | −46.3% | −28.1% | −7.4% | −35.6% | −47.9% | −5.4% | −85.3% | −30.3% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 2 of 10 | −8.2% | −32.4% | −50.6% | −24.6% | −6.7% | −43.9% | −47.7% | 0.0% | −86.2% | −72.0% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 1 of 10 | −11.7% | −39.2% | −54.8% | −33.1% | −6.7% | −40.3% | −42.6% | −1.0% | −97.7% | −52.7% |
| HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc. | 3 of 5 | −7.9% | −36.6% | −19.4% | −24.9% | −4.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | 0 of 9 | −12.6% | −41.7% | −45.5% | −33.5% | −10.2% | −51.3% | −37.8% | −2.2% | −90.1% | — |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 2 of 9 | −12.3% | −38.5% | −42.6% | −29.1% | −4.2% | −37.7% | −35.6% | −3.5% | −84.9% | — |
| PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 3 of 9 | −12.4% | −41.5% | −59.6% | −20.0% | −5.6% | −27.8% | −46.7% | −2.8% | −67.7% | — |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 7 of 9 | −3.4% | −31.7% | −37.4% | −9.4% | −4.3% | −17.3% | −18.0% | −1.9% | −77.5% | — |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −7.2% | −40.8% | −42.3% | −25.2% | −7.1% | −19.9% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −60.4% | −33.0% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −7.0% | −33.8% | −33.0% | −13.3% | −9.4% | −12.7% | −19.3% | −2.0% | −73.9% | — |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −16.2% | −25.8% | −45.6% | −26.5% | −8.8% | −31.6% | −29.3% | −0.3% | −69.7% | −40.7% |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | 2 of 10 | −15.2% | −35.3% | −48.3% | −29.9% | −9.3% | −37.0% | −39.3% | −3.3% | −80.7% | −28.6% |
| LAZ Lazard Inc | 2 of 9 | −11.2% | −31.3% | −50.4% | −29.9% | −6.7% | −41.7% | −46.1% | −6.5% | −59.6% | — |
| EVR Evercore Inc. | 3 of 9 | −12.8% | −41.4% | −55.8% | −36.5% | −8.7% | −27.5% | −33.8% | −3.9% | −74.2% | — |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | 3 of 10 | −17.1% | −34.9% | −51.8% | −28.7% | −8.3% | −47.4% | −39.6% | −4.2% | −41.5% | −31.3% |
| PWP Perella Weinberg Partners | 0 of 2 | −9.7% | −56.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PJT PJT Partners Inc. | 3 of 5 | −5.3% | −27.7% | −52.5% | −33.3% | −4.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| MC Moelis & Company | 3 of 6 | −9.2% | −44.4% | −37.1% | −41.8% | −2.8% | −22.1% | — | — | — | — |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2 of 10 | −12.4% | −38.7% | −47.8% | −26.4% | −6.9% | −37.8% | −45.2% | −0.6% | −93.4% | −36.3% |
How closely does GS move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares GS with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- OPY took just 74% of the S&P 500's losses, against 133% for GS, while still keeping 119% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, GS captured 136% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 133% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.39. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Eight of the 19 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than GS's 1.02, led by CME, OPY and HLI.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than GS's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS This pageThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 136% | 133% | 1.02 | 1.39 |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 50% | 11% | 4.48 | 0.33 |
| OPY Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. | 119% | 74% | 1.60 | 1.12 |
| HLI Houlihan Lokey, Inc. | 101% | 74% | 1.36 | 0.84 |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 117% | 103% | 1.14 | 1.09 |
| PJT PJT Partners Inc. | 111% | 97% | 1.14 | 0.91 |
| PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 152% | 142% | 1.07 | 1.39 |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 103% | 97% | 1.06 | 1.07 |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 142% | 137% | 1.04 | 1.39 |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | 120% | 125% | 0.96 | 1.25 |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 88% | 94% | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 156% | 170% | 0.92 | 1.48 |
| EVR Evercore Inc. | 147% | 162% | 0.91 | 1.58 |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | 171% | 191% | 0.89 | 1.62 |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 127% | 146% | 0.87 | 1.36 |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 127% | 157% | 0.81 | 1.30 |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 131% | 165% | 0.80 | 1.49 |
| MC Moelis & Company | 154% | 196% | 0.79 | 1.58 |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | 147% | 197% | 0.75 | 1.52 |
| LAZ Lazard Inc | 128% | 209% | 0.61 | 1.50 |
| VIRT Virtu Financial, Inc. | 45% | -28% | — | 0.20 |
What diversifies GS?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with GS's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing GS with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in GS into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+21.9% for GS alone, +22.0% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, GCOW and SMH have moved largely independently of GS over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in four of the seven calendar years in which GS lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which GS lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% GS and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +145% | 0.77 | −7.9% | −33.5% | −5.8% | −45.6% | −60.4% | −26.0% | −12.8% | 27.5% | +21.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.27 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | 22.8% | +23.5% |
| GCOW InternationalPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 0.49 | +93.4% | 1.04 | +5.5% | −8.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 23.6% | +20.7% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.49 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +6.8% | −44.7% | −47.0% | −14.6% | 26.1% | +25.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.10 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | — | — | 22.6% | +22.0% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.37 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | +2.8% | −39.0% | −14.8% | −18.2% | 24.4% | +22.9% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.45 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | −9.9% | −12.9% | −21.8% | −45.3% | −24.4% | +2.1% | 24.8% | +22.6% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.48 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −12.6% | −25.7% | +10.2% | — | — | — | 24.0% | +21.7% |
| EDIV InternationalState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 0.40 | +69.9% | 0.84 | −15.3% | −6.2% | −27.4% | — | — | — | — | 23.2% | +20.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +145% | 0.77 | −7.9% | −33.5% | −5.8% | −45.6% | −60.4% | −26.0% | −12.8% | 27.5% | +21.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.24 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −8.3% | −2.5% | 23.9% | +25.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.45 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −65.1% | −25.6% | 29.2% | +38.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.42 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | −9.4% | +73.7% | 27.0% | +34.7% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.14 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | 23.3% | +25.4% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.22 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | 24.3% | +28.1% |
Common questions
What was GS's worst drawdown?
GS's deepest decline since it began trading in 1999 was 78.8%, from October 2007 to November 2008. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were GS's best and worst years?
Over 26 full calendar years, GS's best year was 2009, when it returned 103%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -60.4%.
Is there a better investment than GS?
Among GS's popular alternatives, VIRT was ahead of GS in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, BNY (banks) and CBOE (capital markets) earned more than GS with less volatility over the past 5 years. BNY returned 22.7% a year at 24.4% volatility, against 19.6% a year at 28.6%.
Is GS more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. GS's volatility over the past 5 years was 28.6%, 1.7 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, GS's return lands within 28.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is GS's Sharpe ratio?
GS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.77, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so GS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is GS with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, GS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.73 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against GS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a GS holding.
What are the best alternatives to GS?
Of the 21 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed GS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: VIRT.
Did GS outperform the S&P 500?
GS finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 26 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +56.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did GS do in stock market crashes?
GS fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when GS fell 78.8% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies GS?
These had a low correlation with GS over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.27), GCOW (correlation 0.49) and SMH (correlation 0.49); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.24), CLS (correlation 0.45) and FIX (correlation 0.42). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than GS's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of GS's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to GS
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
MSMorgan Stanley
CCitigroup
KKRKKR & Co. Inc.
BXBlackstone
CMECME Group
BLKBlackRock
ICEIntercontinental Exchange
BACBank of America