Relative Intelligence · Asset Management

How BlackRock (BLK) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on BLK alone. It places BLK (BlackRock, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where BLK stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: BLK's full trading record, from October 1999 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowNot every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, VCTR (Victory Capital) rose 10.9% and BX (Blackstone) fell 9.8%. Over the past 3 months, BLK rose 7.6% against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?BLK held up far better than its industry: it rose 7.6% over the past 3 months while the asset management ETF XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) fell 0.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its asset management peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: VCTR (Victory Capital) rose 10.9%, while BX (Blackstone) fell 9.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsBLK has gone against the market, falling 0.6% over the past year while the S&P 500 rose 15.8%. By year ↓
- Long termBLK turned $10,000 into $41,300 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, year by year, BLK has outpaced the S&P 500 69% of the time since 2000. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, BLK has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. The 2022 bear market took 40.8% off BLK, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than BX (Blackstone, 38.5%) but less than TROW (T. Rowe Price Group, 48.2%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationBLK is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.79 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.80 with the total US market, more closely than 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, BLK's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.30: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.3 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.6 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- CME (CME Group), SEIC (SEI Investments) and BNY (Bank of New York Mellon) earned more than BLK with less volatility over the past 5 years. CME returned 11.2% a year at 20.8% volatility, against 7.1% a year at 27.1%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank, banks) and CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, capital markets) earned more than BLK with less volatility over the past 5 years. TD returned 15.8% a year at 20.0% volatility, against 7.1% a year at 27.1%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 7.1% at 27.1% for BLK.
How much would $10,000 in BLK have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in BLK over the past 26 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of BLK over the same span and BLK's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in BLK at the end of September 2000 would have grown to $562,061 by September 2026, more than the $84,332 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of BLK, and MNST finished highest, at $14,696,345.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2000 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 99 of the 1,261 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BLK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MNST$15M+146,863% total · +32.4% a year
- GWW$720,936+7,109% total · +17.9% a year
- GILD$636,955+6,270% total · +17.3% a year
- CSX$599,833+5,898% total · +17.1% a year
- PGR$590,360+5,804% total · +17.0% a year
- BLK$562,061+5,521% total · +16.8% a year
- WT$261,339+2,513% total · +13.4% a year
- AMG$99,489+895% total · +9.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$84,332+743% total · +8.5% a year
- STT$44,136+341% total · +5.9% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,703 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BLK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- WT$46,089+361% total · +35.7% a year
- VCTR$36,954+270% total · +29.9% a year
- BNY$31,954+220% total · +26.2% a year
- AMG$24,224+142% total · +19.4% a year
- STT$23,984+140% total · +19.1% a year
- FHI$20,892+109% total · +15.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- SEIC$18,496+85.0% total · +13.1% a year
- CME$16,716+67.2% total · +10.8% a year
- BLK$14,247+42.5% total · +7.3% a year
BLK at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- BLK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1999 was 60.4%, from August 2008 to March 2009. It took seven months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 26 full calendar years, BLK's best was 2000, when it returned 144%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 37.0%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- BLK is 4.1% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $175B
- Industry
- Asset Management
- Price history from
- October 1999
Returns
- Past 1 year
- −0.6%total return
- Past 3 years
- +96.3%+25.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +41.1%+7.1% a year
- Past 10 years
- +313%+15.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +144%2000
- Worst calendar year
- −37.0%2008
- Losing years
- 8 of 26full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 27.1%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.39return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −60.4%Aug 2008 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −4.1%below the peak
BLK against the whole market
Where BLK ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does BLK rank among all stocks?
This section ranks BLK on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how BLK stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- BLK's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 12% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | BLK | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | −0.6% | 2,009 of 3,287 | bottom 40% |
| 3-year return | +96.3% | 951 of 3,017 | top 32% |
| 5-year return | +41.1% | 1,198 of 2,893 | top 41% |
| 10-year return | +313% | 552 of 2,202 | top 25% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 27.1% | 484 of 2,893 | top 17% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.39 | 1,255 of 2,893 | top 43% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −43.9% | 258 of 2,187 | top 12% |
What has beaten BLK on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). BLK sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than BLK with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 141 stocks and 433 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than BLK over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 16% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half BLK's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 9% less than BLK's 27.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.39 for BLK.
- Among BLK's popular alternatives, BNY, FHI and SEIC are in the region. BNY earned 22.7% a year against 7.1% a year for BLK, at 24.4% volatility, 10% less than BLK's 27.1%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to BLK; faint dots are 88 more of the 574 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than BLK?
Investments that beat BLK over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among BLK's popular alternatives, CME, SEIC and BNY earned more than BLK with less volatility over the past 5 years. CME returned 11.2% a year at 20.8% volatility, against 7.1% a year at 27.1%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TD (banks) and CBOE (capital markets) earned more than BLK with less volatility over the past 5 years. TD returned 15.8% a year at 20.0% volatility, against 7.1% a year at 27.1%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 7.1% at 27.1% for BLK.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat BLK over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks BLK's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than BLK follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than BLK's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× BLK's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than BLK's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with BLK?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +7.1% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | +313% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.79 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against BLK. 9 of 23 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.30 | — | ||
SEICSEI Investments Company · Asset Management | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 22.3% | 0.65 | −51.8% | +168% | 0.82 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatility | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.73 | — | ||
FHIFederated Hermes, Inc. · Asset Management | Higher return, lower volatility | +15.1% | 24.6% | 0.70 | −64.9% | +214% | 0.56 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −59.6% | +212% | 0.80 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +627% | 0.67 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Asset Management and the categories next to it (Banks, Investment Banking & Brokerage, Alternative Asset Management, Capital Markets), plus BLK's specific themes. 35 of 112 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.51 | — | ||
CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.39 | — | |
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.35 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +8.9% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | +407% | 0.70 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 973 of 3,498 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.62 | 0.18% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.3% | 17.3% | 0.76 | −34.3% | +324% | 0.79 | 0.03% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.24 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.56 | — | ||
BALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Crypto | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +6.3% | 3.3% | 1.85 | −4.9% | — | 0.73 | 0.69% | |
What these numbers mean for BLK
- Annual return
- BLK returned 7.1% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $14,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- BLK's volatility over the past 5 years was 27.1%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BLK's return lands within 27.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- BLK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.39, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BLK earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- BLK's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 43.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 43.9% fall takes a 78.3% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, BLK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.79 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BLK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BLK holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 574 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than BLK with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with BLK | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.53 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.62 | 0.18% | |
| 3 | Whole market | +12.3% | 17.3% | 0.76 | −34.3% | +324% | 0.79 | 0.03% | |
| 4 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.24 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.59 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.45 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.70 | 0.04% | |
| 8 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.64 | 0.40% |
| 9 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.14 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.31 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.38 | — | |
| 12 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.57 | 0.70% |
| 13 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.56 | 0.13% |
| 14 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.41 | — | |
| 15 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +243% | 0.37 | — |
| 16 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.39 | — | |
| 17 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.45 | 0.59% |
| 18 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.16 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.48 | — | |
| 20 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.44 | 0.19% |
| 21 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.11 | — | |
| 22 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.5% | 22.5% | 0.83 | −31.4% | — | 0.65 | 0.15% |
| 23 | Same or nearby category | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.51 | — | |
| 24 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.81 | 0.05% |
| 25 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.24 | — | |
| 26 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Same or nearby category | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.39 | — |
| 27 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.16 | — | |
| 28 | Same or nearby category | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.53 | — | |
| 29 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.30 | 0.48% |
| 30 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.55 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.28 | — | |
| 32 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.75 | 0.40% |
| 33 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.33 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.24 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.36 | — | |
| 36 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.25 | — | |
| 37 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.67 | 0.50% |
| 38 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.16 | — | |
| 39 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.39 | — | |
| 40 | Popular alternative | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.30 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.55 | — | |
| 42 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.54 | 0.40% |
| 43 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.47 | — | |
| 44 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.23 | — | |
| 45 | Whole market | +8.2% | 16.4% | 0.57 | −36.0% | +140% | 0.70 | 0.05% | |
| 46 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.62 | — | |
| 47 | PWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.8% | 22.2% | 0.74 | −32.4% | +409% | 0.62 | 0.55% |
| 48 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.27 | — | |
| 49 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.32 | — | |
| 50 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.75 | 0.03% | |
| 51 | Whole market | +8.3% | 23.3% | 0.46 | −40.5% | +446% | 0.64 | — | |
| 52 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.26 | — | |
| 53 | Whole market | +9.3% | 16.9% | 0.61 | −35.8% | +153% | 0.70 | 0.03% | |
| 54 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.49 | — | |
| 55 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.25 | 0.40% | |
| 56 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.19 | — |
| 57 | PTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETF · Technology | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.1% | 0.73 | −28.1% | +305% | 0.44 | 0.65% |
| 58 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.38 | — |
| 59 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.80 | 0.19% |
| 60 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.79 | 0.04% | |
| 61 | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +13.3% | 23.8% | 0.65 | −49.7% | — | 0.21 | — |
| 62 | Whole market | +9.7% | 14.3% | 0.72 | −33.4% | +252% | 0.74 | 0.06% | |
| 63 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.23 | — | |
| 64 | Whole market | +11.1% | 24.2% | 0.56 | −36.7% | +204% | 0.20 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.80 | 0.06% | |
| 66 | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.8% | 0.67 | −38.4% | +170% | 0.25 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.81 | 0.21% | |
| 68 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.77 | 0.79% |
| 69 | Whole market | +9.5% | 24.5% | 0.49 | −37.6% | +95.1% | 0.12 | — | |
| 70 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.79 | 0.85% |
| 71 | Whole market | +12.4% | 20.2% | 0.68 | −32.9% | +185% | 0.31 | — | |
| 72 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.62 | 0.15% |
| 73 | AIZAssurant, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +13.3% | 25.3% | 0.62 | −44.6% | +312% | 0.30 | — |
| 74 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.41 | — |
| 75 | Same or nearby category | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.58 | — | |
| 76 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.78 | 0.26% | |
| 77 | Same or nearby category | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.63 | — | |
| 78 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.3% | 0.71 | −34.1% | +293% | 0.76 | 0.15% | |
| 79 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.17 | — |
| 80 | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.8% | 0.70 | −30.9% | +114% | 0.26 | — | |
| 81 | Whole market | +8.4% | 15.3% | 0.60 | −28.4% | +202% | 0.47 | 0.08% | |
| 82 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.42 | — |
| 83 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.67 | 0.27% |
| 84 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.77 | 0.15% |
| 85 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.62 | 0.08% |
| 86 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.39 | — |
| 87 | DFATDimensional - US Targeted Value ETF · US Small-Cap Equity | Whole market | +9.6% | 21.0% | 0.54 | −26.1% | — | 0.72 | 0.33% |
| 88 | FTSFortis Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +8.4% | 16.4% | 0.58 | −34.3% | +154% | 0.34 | — |
| 89 | AVEMAvantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.5% | 0.56 | −36.0% | — | 0.54 | 0.33% |
| 90 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.65 | 0.20% |
| 91 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.41 | — |
| 92 | COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.7% | 0.70 | −38.7% | — | 0.70 | 0.49% |
| 93 | BUFRFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF · Buffered Equity | Whole market | +9.9% | 10.5% | 0.96 | −13.7% | — | 0.81 | 0.10% |
| 94 | Whole market | +9.0% | 22.9% | 0.49 | −40.8% | +320% | 0.62 | — | |
| 95 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.78 | 0.39% |
| 96 | EVRGEvergy, Inc. · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +9.5% | 18.9% | 0.57 | −38.8% | +109% | 0.40 | — |
| 97 | BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.3% | 18.6% | 0.57 | −32.7% | — | 0.58 | 0.19% |
| 98 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.40 | — | |
| 99 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.62 | 0.35% |
| 100 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.35 | — |
BLK against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against BLK, compared period by period and year by year.
How do BLK's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at BLK, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Four of the 23 popular alternatives, led by BNY, FHI and SEIC, were both more rewarding and calmer than BLK over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, BLK returned 7.1% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (27.1% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than BLK with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| WT WisdomTree, Inc. | +31.4% | 32.8% |
| VCTR Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. | +28.1% | 35.0% |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | +22.7% | 24.4% |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | +18.8% | 31.9% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | +16.0% | 28.8% |
| FHI Federated Hermes, Inc. | +15.1% | 24.6% |
| STT State Street Corporation | +14.4% | 29.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| SEIC SEI Investments Company | +12.7% | 22.3% |
| ARES Ares Management Corporation | +11.4% | 38.2% |
| CME CME Group Inc. | +11.2% | 20.8% |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | +10.5% | 37.3% |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | +8.9% | 29.3% |
| BLK This pageBlackRock, Inc. | +7.1% | 27.1% |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | +6.9% | 36.4% |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | +5.7% | 39.8% |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | +5.6% | 31.7% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | +5.4% | 21.8% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | +3.6% | 31.9% |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | +0.9% | 31.1% |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | +0.7% | 25.6% |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | +0.4% | 39.8% |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 0.0% | 27.6% |
| CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | −1.4% | 30.5% |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | −8.9% | 30.5% |
Has BLK consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares BLK with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than BLK helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Five of the 23 popular alternatives, led by AMG, VCTR and STT, outperformed BLK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- CME earned more for the risk it took than BLK (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
- MS outperformed BLK over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so BLK has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than BLK over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. (this page) | — | +3.5% | +7.6% | +8.8% | +5.7% | −0.6% | +96.3% | +41.1% | +313% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | — | $175B | — |
| AMG QualifiedAffiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +6.6% | +6.2% | +29.2% | +34.6% | +59.9% | +214% | +137% | +185% | 31.9% | 0.70 | −78.5% | — | $10B | — |
| VCTR QualifiedVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +0.6% | +10.9% | +47.0% | +72.1% | +69.8% | +305% | +245% | — | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | $6.7B | — |
| STT QualifiedState Street Corporation | 3/5 short2/3 long | −9.2% | −8.3% | +12.1% | +31.3% | +47.9% | +181% | +96.2% | +212% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −59.6% | — | $46B | — |
| WT QualifiedWisdomTree, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −8.9% | +6.9% | +18.5% | +73.6% | +67.0% | +230% | +292% | +174% | 32.8% | 1.00 | −84.0% | — | $3.3B | — |
| SEIC QualifiedSEI Investments Company | 3/5 short2/3 long | +1.7% | +7.8% | +32.4% | +29.8% | +32.7% | +102% | +81.6% | +168% | 22.3% | 0.65 | −51.8% | — | $13B | — |
| BNY Investment - Banking & Investment ServicesBank of New York Mellon Corp | 2/5 short3/3 long | −6.3% | −7.7% | +7.4% | +24.8% | +35.3% | +272% | +179% | +341% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | — | $98B | — |
| MS Financial - Capital MarketsMorgan Stanley | 1/5 short3/3 long | −12.5% | −14.0% | −4.4% | +0.8% | +13.9% | +170% | +110% | +627% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | — | $285B | — |
| FHI Asset ManagementFederated Hermes, Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −3.8% | −3.1% | −0.6% | +9.0% | +11.1% | +101% | +102% | +214% | 24.6% | 0.70 | −64.9% | — | $4.2B | — |
| NTRS Asset ManagementNorthern Trust Corporation | 2/5 short2/3 long | −7.5% | −9.1% | +5.0% | +20.6% | +31.1% | +180% | +52.9% | +205% | 29.3% | 0.44 | −50.0% | — | $30B | — |
| ARES Asset ManagementAres Management Corporation | 0/5 short2/3 long | −8.2% | −3.1% | −0.1% | −27.7% | −17.4% | +24.9% | +71.4% | +926% | 38.2% | 0.48 | −49.9% | — | $38B | — |
| APO Asset ManagementApollo Global Management, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −13.0% | −5.5% | −11.9% | −23.2% | −9.7% | +41.4% | +64.9% | +825% | 37.3% | 0.46 | −53.5% | — | $66B | — |
| CME Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesCME Group Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +7.2% | +21.0% | +3.8% | +13.2% | +14.6% | +57.7% | +70.1% | +319% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | — | $106B | — |
| IVZ Asset ManagementInvesco Ltd. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −8.3% | −2.3% | +17.0% | +9.3% | +30.0% | +158% | +39.8% | +50.9% | 36.4% | 0.37 | −79.8% | — | $13B | — |
| KKR Asset ManagementKKR & Co. Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −11.5% | −7.8% | −13.8% | −30.4% | −25.2% | +65.7% | +31.8% | +653% | 39.8% | 0.34 | −49.4% | — | $80B | — |
| BX Asset ManagementBlackstone Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −12.7% | −9.8% | −12.8% | −28.3% | −28.4% | +28.6% | +2.1% | +628% | 39.8% | 0.21 | −49.3% | — | $127B | — |
| BEN Asset ManagementFranklin Resources, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −6.2% | −2.1% | +14.9% | +35.9% | +44.8% | +62.4% | +31.5% | +49.2% | 31.7% | 0.33 | −62.1% | — | $16B | — |
| ICE Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesIntercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +2.1% | +12.4% | −0.6% | +0.1% | +3.5% | +52.4% | +30.0% | +240% | 21.8% | 0.35 | −34.3% | — | $89B | — |
| CNS Asset ManagementCohen & Steers, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −3.2% | −12.0% | +7.4% | +16.5% | +5.8% | +53.3% | −6.9% | +195% | 30.5% | 0.10 | −55.1% | — | $3.7B | — |
| SPGI Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesS&P Global Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +8.3% | −2.1% | −0.6% | −13.9% | −7.4% | +28.2% | +3.7% | +293% | 25.6% | 0.16 | −39.8% | — | $129B | — |
| TROW Asset ManagementT. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −2.4% | −11.2% | +6.7% | +1.5% | +3.1% | +22.7% | −37.4% | +126% | 30.5% | -0.16 | −58.2% | — | $22B | — |
| AB Asset ManagementAllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.1% | −6.1% | −6.3% | −3.5% | −3.7% | +56.6% | −0.1% | +281% | 27.6% | 0.14 | −58.1% | — | $3.2B | — |
| SCHW Financial - Capital MarketsThe Charles Schwab Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −15.0% | −11.1% | −1.8% | −9.6% | −3.1% | +86.2% | +19.1% | +221% | 31.9% | 0.27 | −51.1% | — | $157B | — |
| APAM Asset ManagementArtisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −10.4% | −12.7% | −8.8% | −14.1% | −16.8% | +26.9% | +4.6% | +200% | 31.1% | 0.18 | −51.1% | — | $2.3B | — |
How did BLK do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2000, along with where BLK ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with BLK and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, BLK finished in the top quarter in seven of 26 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 14 of 24.
- BLK finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 16 of its 26 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, APO came out ahead of BLK most often, in nine of the 14 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of BLK; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places BLK among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of BLK | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLK This pageBlackRock, Inc. | — | +6.6% | +29.3% | +17.9% | −20.4% | +29.4% | +47.2% | +31.9% | −21.6% | +38.2% | +14.6% | −2.4% | +15.7% | +57.0% | +19.8% | −3.6% | −15.9% | +76.6% | −37.0% | +45.1% | +41.8% | +42.4% | +47.6% | +35.9% | −5.5% | −0.7% | +144% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 26 | 14 of 24 | 13 of 24 | 13 of 24 | 13 of 24 | 19 of 24 | 2 of 24 | 12 of 24 | 13 of 23 | 9 of 23 | 10 of 23 | 10 of 23 | 8 of 22 | 11 of 21 | 14 of 21 | 7 of 20 | 20 of 20 | 6 of 20 | 3 of 20 | 3 of 18 | 8 of 18 | 3 of 17 | 3 of 16 | 8 of 16 | 4 of 15 | 5 of 15 | 2 of 15 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 26 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 9 of 26 | +55.9% | +22.2% | −4.4% | −3.7% | +61.8% | +20.5% | −11.8% | −52.1% | +41.9% | −9.0% | −24.7% | −2.1% | +66.6% | +35.6% | −3.3% | +47.3% | +60.7% | −64.3% | +11.7% | +31.0% | +18.5% | +46.0% | +38.4% | −28.6% | +28.5% | +35.7% |
| VCTR Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 7 | −0.8% | +95.9% | +33.5% | −23.9% | +49.7% | +19.7% | +106% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| STT State Street Corporation | 6 of 26 | +35.5% | +30.2% | +3.5% | −13.8% | +31.0% | −4.8% | +29.3% | −34.0% | +27.8% | +19.8% | −13.9% | +8.7% | +58.6% | +19.2% | −11.4% | +6.6% | +10.8% | −50.7% | +21.9% | +23.2% | +14.5% | −4.4% | +35.4% | −24.5% | −15.2% | +71.1% |
| WT WisdomTree, Inc. | 12 of 26 | +17.3% | +53.6% | +29.4% | −8.9% | +16.5% | +13.7% | −25.9% | −46.2% | +16.5% | −26.6% | +2.8% | −11.0% | +189% | +1.1% | +46.0% | +125% | +163% | −74.7% | −64.3% | +236% | +33.3% | +4,221% | −69.2% | +88.4% | −83.0% | −88.0% |
| SEIC SEI Investments Company | 10 of 26 | +0.6% | +31.5% | +10.6% | −2.9% | +7.4% | −11.1% | +43.4% | −34.9% | +46.2% | −4.8% | +32.1% | +16.8% | +50.8% | +38.5% | −26.0% | +37.0% | +13.2% | −50.9% | +8.3% | +61.7% | −11.2% | +38.8% | +12.4% | −39.4% | −19.3% | +183% |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | 12 of 26 | +54.4% | +51.9% | +18.5% | −19.1% | +40.6% | −12.9% | +9.6% | −10.8% | +15.7% | +17.1% | +3.3% | +18.3% | +38.6% | +32.1% | −32.8% | +9.3% | +0.9% | −40.4% | +20.0% | +26.8% | −1.2% | +4.8% | +45.2% | −38.9% | −23.4% | +42.7% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 12 of 26 | +45.2% | +39.7% | +13.9% | −10.3% | +46.6% | +38.1% | +32.7% | −22.8% | +26.6% | +36.1% | −16.7% | +25.0% | +65.4% | +27.6% | −43.9% | −7.5% | +88.3% | −68.8% | −22.1% | +46.3% | +4.6% | −2.0% | +48.4% | −27.0% | −28.1% | +12.3% |
| FHI Federated Hermes, Inc. | 7 of 26 | +30.5% | +29.6% | −3.8% | −0.1% | +34.6% | −3.8% | +27.0% | −23.4% | +30.9% | +6.5% | −10.3% | +18.4% | +48.0% | +50.2% | −39.6% | +4.0% | +69.0% | −57.6% | +24.6% | −6.9% | +24.2% | +5.0% | +17.0% | −19.9% | +10.1% | +119% |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 8 of 26 | +36.9% | +25.6% | −1.0% | −23.8% | +31.6% | −9.3% | +30.6% | −14.7% | +14.2% | +26.1% | +9.1% | +11.1% | +26.1% | +29.9% | −26.5% | +8.1% | +2.7% | −30.8% | +28.2% | +19.1% | +8.6% | +6.7% | +34.5% | −40.9% | −25.4% | +55.1% |
| ARES Ares Management Corporation | 7 of 11 | −6.2% | +52.7% | +79.5% | −12.7% | +77.7% | +37.3% | +110% | −5.6% | +11.6% | +56.5% | −20.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 9 of 14 | −11.1% | +79.9% | +49.5% | −9.6% | +53.3% | +8.0% | +107% | −22.0% | +85.4% | +37.3% | −29.3% | −15.9% | +112% | +54.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 11 of 23 | +19.8% | +15.4% | +31.3% | −22.9% | +29.5% | −6.3% | +9.7% | +32.1% | +32.4% | +33.9% | +4.4% | +18.3% | +64.0% | +11.4% | −22.7% | −2.7% | +64.3% | −68.8% | +35.3% | +39.5% | +61.8% | +219% | +67.5% | — | — | — |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | 7 of 26 | +56.9% | +3.0% | +4.2% | −18.7% | +35.5% | +3.0% | +14.9% | −52.0% | +24.6% | −5.9% | −12.1% | +11.5% | +43.4% | +33.4% | −14.6% | +4.8% | +66.6% | −52.6% | +442% | +72.6% | +35.5% | −6.8% | +36.2% | −52.8% | −30.3% | +101% |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | 10 of 18 | −13.3% | +79.6% | +80.5% | −37.0% | +85.8% | +41.1% | +51.5% | −4.3% | +41.8% | +3.4% | −28.0% | +4.0% | +73.8% | +25.6% | −5.3% | +70.4% | +153% | −81.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 9 of 18 | −7.8% | +35.1% | +82.8% | −40.0% | +107% | +19.8% | +96.3% | +0.1% | +27.4% | −1.5% | −5.0% | +13.9% | +114% | +15.7% | +3.4% | +12.7% | +117% | −67.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 7 of 26 | +24.8% | −27.2% | +16.9% | −17.5% | +39.0% | +1.4% | −9.2% | −23.4% | +11.6% | +9.8% | −32.5% | −2.3% | +38.9% | +35.2% | −10.9% | +6.5% | +71.8% | −43.7% | +4.4% | +17.8% | +39.8% | +34.6% | +53.3% | −2.5% | −6.7% | +19.6% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 9 of 20 | +9.9% | +17.5% | +27.1% | −23.9% | +19.9% | +26.2% | +24.5% | +8.1% | +26.6% | +11.5% | +18.3% | −1.3% | +82.2% | +2.7% | +1.2% | +6.1% | +36.2% | −57.2% | +78.4% | +197% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 8 of 21 | −29.8% | +25.5% | +21.8% | −28.0% | +29.0% | +23.4% | +93.9% | −19.7% | +46.9% | +14.9% | −24.1% | +9.8% | +37.9% | +13.6% | +15.9% | +27.9% | +110% | −62.1% | −23.1% | +119% | +19.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 11 of 26 | +5.7% | +13.9% | +32.8% | −28.4% | +44.7% | +21.4% | +62.3% | +1.4% | +59.3% | +10.5% | +12.3% | +15.5% | +45.9% | +30.1% | +26.6% | +12.0% | +49.3% | −45.5% | −34.7% | +33.5% | +14.2% | +33.0% | +17.8% | +0.8% | +5.7% | −3.2% |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 6 of 26 | −4.7% | +9.7% | +3.4% | −42.2% | +34.9% | +28.1% | +35.6% | −9.8% | +43.4% | +8.5% | −12.2% | +4.7% | +31.3% | +18.1% | −9.8% | +23.8% | +54.2% | −40.6% | +41.1% | +23.0% | +17.6% | +33.2% | +77.2% | −19.8% | −16.3% | +15.8% |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 10 of 26 | +13.4% | +30.4% | −2.3% | −23.4% | +56.3% | +23.0% | +19.9% | +21.0% | +16.9% | +7.0% | −1.1% | +30.3% | +31.2% | +42.6% | −39.4% | −12.2% | +44.2% | −70.1% | −1.2% | +50.2% | +42.7% | +28.7% | +16.1% | −31.8% | +0.9% | +82.0% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 10 of 26 | +36.6% | +9.2% | −16.0% | +0.1% | +60.2% | +13.6% | +16.4% | −18.4% | +31.1% | +21.0% | +9.9% | +17.2% | +83.3% | +29.8% | −33.1% | −7.8% | +18.1% | −36.1% | +40.0% | +32.8% | +23.5% | +1.7% | +9.5% | −29.5% | −45.4% | +11.4% |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 4 of 12 | +2.8% | +4.9% | +60.3% | −31.3% | +2.8% | +71.0% | +67.1% | −38.2% | +45.2% | −10.1% | −23.1% | −17.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How BLK has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were BLK's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents BLK's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1999, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of BLK's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after BLK fell 41.9% from January to August 2010; it did not regain that peak until January 2013, two years later.
Green means BLK fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | BLK fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −60.4% | −45.6% | Aug 2008 | Mar 2009 | 7 months | Oct 2009 | 7 months |
| 2022 bear market | −43.9% | −22.5% | Nov 2021 | Oct 2022 | 11 months | Sep 2024 | 23 months |
| Covid crash | −42.4% | −33.5% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jul 2020 | 4 months |
| 2010 flash crash | −41.9% | −7.5% | Jan 2010 | Aug 2010 | 7 months | Jan 2013 | 2.4 years |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −37.5% | −15.5% | Jan 2018 | Dec 2018 | 11 months | Feb 2020 | 14 months |
How did BLK do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far BLK, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- BLK fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when BLK fell 40.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, CME held up best, falling less than BLK in seven of the nine crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than BLK.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLK This pageBlackRock, Inc. | — | −7.2% | −40.8% | −42.3% | −25.2% | −7.1% | −19.9% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −60.4% | −33.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −12.8% | −32.9% | −49.1% | −38.7% | −9.0% | −44.4% | −31.8% | −4.8% | −85.9% | −46.4% |
| VCTR Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 4 | −9.7% | −36.2% | −43.8% | −28.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| STT State Street Corporation | 0 of 10 | −14.6% | −41.4% | −45.1% | −32.3% | −8.3% | −34.1% | −28.3% | −1.9% | −82.3% | −50.7% |
| WT WisdomTree, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −4.2% | −26.7% | −60.0% | −26.7% | −6.9% | −59.2% | −35.9% | −3.5% | −86.4% | −99.5% |
| SEIC SEI Investments Company | 1 of 10 | −6.9% | −24.7% | −47.2% | −31.1% | −7.3% | −38.4% | −31.1% | −2.8% | −71.2% | −69.0% |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | 3 of 10 | −11.4% | −40.5% | −40.1% | −16.2% | −5.4% | −27.0% | −30.9% | −0.5% | −62.4% | −62.6% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 2 of 10 | −8.2% | −32.4% | −50.6% | −24.6% | −6.7% | −43.9% | −47.7% | 0.0% | −86.2% | −72.0% |
| FHI Federated Hermes, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −3.5% | −26.9% | −64.3% | −11.9% | −7.0% | −30.9% | −25.7% | −0.1% | −62.6% | −32.8% |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 2 of 10 | −10.7% | −36.0% | −39.0% | −27.2% | −8.1% | −29.9% | −25.4% | 0.0% | −60.5% | −65.2% |
| ARES Ares Management Corporation | 1 of 6 | −12.7% | −35.7% | −44.1% | −26.7% | −6.9% | −43.4% | — | — | — | — |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 1 of 7 | −17.9% | −35.5% | −48.9% | −35.7% | −10.8% | −40.0% | −44.2% | — | — | — |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 7 of 9 | −3.4% | −31.7% | −37.4% | −9.4% | −4.3% | −17.3% | −18.0% | −1.9% | −77.5% | — |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | 0 of 10 | −7.5% | −43.4% | −57.8% | −34.4% | −9.2% | −33.1% | −35.1% | −3.6% | −85.0% | −82.0% |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | 0 of 9 | −12.6% | −41.7% | −45.5% | −33.5% | −10.2% | −51.3% | −37.8% | −2.2% | −90.1% | — |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 2 of 9 | −12.3% | −38.5% | −42.6% | −29.1% | −4.2% | −37.7% | −35.6% | −3.5% | −84.9% | — |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −5.5% | −39.2% | −40.4% | −19.0% | −7.1% | −29.3% | −32.1% | −2.5% | −72.5% | −40.3% |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −7.0% | −33.8% | −33.0% | −13.3% | −9.4% | −12.7% | −19.3% | −2.0% | −73.9% | — |
| CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −9.7% | −38.9% | −55.1% | −14.7% | −2.8% | −16.7% | −31.6% | −1.8% | −80.2% | — |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 7 of 10 | −4.2% | −36.3% | −38.1% | −24.6% | −6.2% | −21.3% | −20.8% | −0.4% | −66.4% | −29.5% |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −6.8% | −48.2% | −38.0% | −23.4% | −7.2% | −15.0% | −23.4% | −1.7% | −67.4% | −54.1% |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 3 of 10 | −4.1% | −32.5% | −58.1% | −23.3% | −7.5% | −40.9% | −28.1% | 0.0% | −87.5% | −54.7% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 3 of 10 | −31.9% | −36.9% | −41.5% | −26.5% | −8.2% | −37.0% | −28.9% | −5.5% | −56.0% | −83.1% |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 1 of 6 | −6.8% | −39.4% | −49.7% | −38.0% | −10.1% | −46.5% | — | — | — | — |
How closely does BLK move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares BLK with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 13 of the 22 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than BLK's 0.81, led by CME, ARES and MS.
- AB took just 112% of the S&P 500's losses, against 157% for BLK, while still keeping 102% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, BLK captured 127% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 157% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.30. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than BLK's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLK This pageBlackRock, Inc. | 127% | 157% | 0.81 | 1.30 |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 50% | 11% | 4.48 | 0.33 |
| ARES Ares Management Corporation | 157% | 146% | 1.07 | 1.29 |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 142% | 137% | 1.04 | 1.39 |
| APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 166% | 168% | 0.99 | 1.58 |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 89% | 90% | 0.99 | 0.91 |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | 115% | 120% | 0.96 | 1.08 |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 88% | 94% | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 156% | 170% | 0.92 | 1.48 |
| FHI Federated Hermes, Inc. | 85% | 93% | 0.91 | 0.90 |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 102% | 112% | 0.91 | 1.10 |
| KKR KKR & Co. Inc. | 171% | 191% | 0.89 | 1.62 |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 107% | 125% | 0.85 | 1.04 |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 111% | 136% | 0.82 | 1.18 |
| STT State Street Corporation | 128% | 166% | 0.77 | 1.48 |
| CNS Cohen & Steers, Inc. | 104% | 134% | 0.77 | 1.27 |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 103% | 137% | 0.76 | 1.22 |
| SEIC SEI Investments Company | 97% | 127% | 0.76 | 1.03 |
| WT WisdomTree, Inc. | 133% | 185% | 0.72 | 1.48 |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 160% | 224% | 0.72 | 1.79 |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 118% | 172% | 0.68 | 1.35 |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 102% | 170% | 0.60 | 1.39 |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | 119% | 201% | 0.59 | 1.46 |
What diversifies BLK?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with BLK's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing BLK with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in BLK into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 23% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+7.3% for BLK alone, +8.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and GLD have moved largely independently of BLK over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in five of the eight calendar years in which BLK lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which BLK lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% BLK and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +41.1% | 0.39 | −20.4% | −21.6% | −2.4% | −3.6% | −15.9% | −37.0% | −5.5% | −0.7% | 27.8% | +7.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.30 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −20.8% | — | — | 23.2% | +11.6% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.46 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +6.8% | +19.0% | −44.7% | −47.0% | −14.6% | 26.2% | +13.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.25 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +4.9% | — | — | 23.3% | +10.2% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.38 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | +2.8% | +21.9% | −39.0% | −14.8% | −18.2% | 24.7% | +11.1% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.45 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | −9.9% | −12.9% | −21.8% | +22.8% | −45.3% | −24.4% | +2.1% | 25.0% | +10.7% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.43 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −12.6% | −25.7% | +10.2% | — | — | — | — | 24.1% | +10.1% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.37 | +59.7% | 0.82 | +21.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.5% | +8.9% |
| DBA AlternativesInvesco DB Agriculture Fund | 0.19 | +66.4% | 0.81 | +2.5% | −8.7% | −17.2% | −10.7% | +22.4% | −19.1% | — | — | 22.8% | +8.7% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +41.1% | 0.39 | −20.4% | −21.6% | −2.4% | −3.6% | −15.9% | −37.0% | −5.5% | −0.7% | 27.8% | +7.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.16 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −39.6% | −8.3% | −2.5% | 23.7% | +14.0% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.37 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −24.4% | +2.8% | −20.5% | −65.1% | −25.6% | 28.7% | +25.6% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.37 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −17.0% | +8.7% | −15.2% | −9.4% | +73.7% | 26.9% | +21.9% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.14 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +11.8% | +13.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | 23.5% | +13.4% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.23 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 24.6% | +15.8% |
Common questions
What was BLK's worst drawdown?
BLK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1999 was 60.4%, from August 2008 to March 2009. It took seven months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were BLK's best and worst years?
Over 26 full calendar years, BLK's best year was 2000, when it returned 144%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -37.0%.
Is there a better investment than BLK?
Among BLK's popular alternatives, CME, SEIC and BNY earned more than BLK with less volatility over the past 5 years. CME returned 11.2% a year at 20.8% volatility, against 7.1% a year at 27.1%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, TD (banks) and CBOE (capital markets) earned more than BLK with less volatility over the past 5 years. TD returned 15.8% a year at 20.0% volatility, against 7.1% a year at 27.1%.
Is BLK more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. BLK's volatility over the past 5 years was 27.1%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BLK's return lands within 27.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is BLK's Sharpe ratio?
BLK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.39, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BLK earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is BLK with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, BLK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.79 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BLK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BLK holding.
What are the best alternatives to BLK?
Of the 23 popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed BLK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: AMG, VCTR and STT.
Did BLK outperform the S&P 500?
BLK finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 16 of 26 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +6.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did BLK do in stock market crashes?
BLK fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when BLK fell 40.8% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies BLK?
These had a low correlation with BLK over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.30), SMH (correlation 0.46) and GLD (correlation 0.25); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.16), CLS (correlation 0.37) and FIX (correlation 0.37). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than BLK's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of BLK's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to BLK
STTState Street
BNYBank of New York Mellon
MSMorgan Stanley
ARESAres Management
APOApollo Global Management
CMECME Group
KKRKKR & Co. Inc.
BXBlackstone
ICEIntercontinental Exchange
SPGIS&P Global
SCHWCharles Schwab