Relative Intelligence · Food & Beverages

How Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CCEP alone. It places CCEP (Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC) against 14 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CCEP stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: CCEP's full trading record, from November 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowCCEP has outpaced the market, rising 17.8% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its food & beverage peers split over the past 6 months: KDP (Keurig Dr Pepper) rose 32.5%, while PEP (PepsiCo) fell 12.8%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?CCEP rose 6.8% over the past 3 months, 2.8 points ahead of the food & beverages ETF XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF), which rose 4.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: CCEP rose 12.8% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, CCEP rose 28.3% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (116% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termCCEP turned $10,000 into $39,200 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: CCEP rose 146% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the Covid crash, CCEP fell 47.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than KO (Coca-Cola, 37.0%) but less than CELH (Celsius, 51.8%). CCEP fell further than the S&P 500 in three of the last three sell-offs, including the Covid crash (47.6% against 33.7%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationCCEP is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.34 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.33 with the total US market, less closely than 62% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years CCEP kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: 69% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 56% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.66. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- COKE (Coca-Cola Consolidated) was ahead of CCEP in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.0% volatility against 23.2%).
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CCEP with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF).
How much would $10,000 in CCEP have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CCEP over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CCEP over the same span and CCEP's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in CCEP at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $129,076 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CCEP, and MNST finished highest, at $45,663,831.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 444 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CCEP; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MNST$46M+456,538% total · +33.7% a year
- COKE$514,380+5,044% total · +14.6% a year
- FIZZ$407,992+3,980% total · +13.6% a year
- BALL$345,859+3,359% total · +13.0% a year
- ABEV$151,187+1,412% total · +9.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- CCEP$129,076+1,191% total · +9.2% a year
- KOF$107,079+971% total · +8.5% a year
- KO$60,026+500% total · +6.4% a year
- CCK$27,821+178% total · +3.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 679 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CCEP; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- COKE$50,300+403% total · +38.1% a year
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- MCK$43,941+339% total · +34.5% a year
- DXJ$32,976+230% total · +27.0% a year
- KOF$23,968+140% total · +19.1% a year
- CCEP$21,567+116% total · +16.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- KO$18,994+89.9% total · +13.7% a year
- CELH$9,107−8.9% total · −1.9% a year
CCEP at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- CCEP's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 79.5%, from April 1998 to November 2008. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- CCEP is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, CCEP's best was 1997, when it returned 121%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 52.9%. It lost money in six of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $50B
- Industry
- Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
- Price history from
- November 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +28.3%total return
- Past 3 years
- +116%+29.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +146%+19.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +292%+14.6% a year
- Best calendar year
- +121%1997
- Worst calendar year
- −52.9%2008
- Losing years
- 6 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 23.2%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.90return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −79.5%Apr 1998 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
CCEP against the whole market
Where CCEP ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does CCEP rank among all stocks?
This section ranks CCEP on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how CCEP stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), CCEP ranks in the top 6% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | CCEP | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +28.3% | 1,019 of 3,287 | top 31% |
| 3-year return | +116% | 802 of 3,017 | top 27% |
| 5-year return | +146% | 466 of 2,893 | top 16% |
| 10-year return | +292% | 608 of 2,202 | top 28% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 23.2% | 221 of 2,893 | top 8% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.90 | 174 of 2,893 | top 6% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −48.8% | 416 of 2,187 | top 19% |
What has beaten CCEP on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). CCEP sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than CCEP with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- One stock and four ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CCEP over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half CCEP's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 18% less than CCEP's 23.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.90 for CCEP.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to CCEP; faint dots are 2 more of the 5 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× CCEP's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than CCEP?
Investments that beat CCEP over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among CCEP's popular alternatives, COKE was ahead of CCEP in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.0% volatility against 23.2%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CCEP with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ and DBJP.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat CCEP over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks CCEP's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than CCEP follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than CCEP's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× CCEP's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than CCEP's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with CCEP?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.34 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against CCEP. 1 of 14 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | Higher return in most periods | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | 0.45 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 65 of 3,583 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.37 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.39 | 0.48% | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.25 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.24 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.33 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.37 | — | ||
SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatility | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | -0.03 | 0.80% | |
What these numbers mean for CCEP
- Annual return
- CCEP returned 19.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $24,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- CCEP's volatility over the past 5 years was 23.2%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CCEP's return lands within 23.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- CCEP's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.90, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CCEP earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- CCEP's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 48.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 48.8% fall takes a 95.2% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, CCEP's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.34 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CCEP instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CCEP holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 5 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than CCEP with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 4 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with CCEP | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.39 | 0.48% |
| 2 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.37 | — | |
| 3 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.34 | 0.45% |
| 4 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.32 | 0.95% |
CCEP against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against CCEP, compared period by period and year by year.
How do CCEP's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at CCEP, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 14 popular alternatives earned more than CCEP over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Eight of the 14 popular alternatives earned less than CCEP over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, CCEP returned 19.7% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (23.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than CCEP with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | +41.2% | 38.0% |
| KOF Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. | +22.3% | 24.7% |
| CCEP This pageCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC | +19.7% | 23.2% |
| MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | +17.2% | 24.9% |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | +14.7% | 16.8% |
| FMX Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. | +14.1% | 25.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| ABEV Ambev S.A. | +9.9% | 30.2% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | +4.0% | 20.2% |
| CCK Crown Holdings, Inc. | +2.7% | 29.0% |
| KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. | +2.5% | 22.1% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | −0.5% | 19.1% |
| CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | −0.9% | 66.2% |
| AMCR Amcor plc | −0.9% | 25.7% |
| FIZZ National Beverage Corp. | −4.8% | 29.9% |
| BALL Ball Corporation | −5.8% | 30.6% |
Has CCEP consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares CCEP with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than CCEP helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 14 popular alternatives, COKE, outperformed CCEP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- KO earned more for the risk it took than CCEP (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than CCEP over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| CCEP Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (this page) | — | +12.8% | +6.8% | +17.8% | +29.9% | +28.3% | +116% | +146% | +292% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | — | $50B | — |
| COKE QualifiedCoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +12.3% | +17.3% | +14.9% | +42.9% | +61.7% | +255% | +461% | +1,569% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | — | $14B | — |
| KOF Beverages - Non-AlcoholicCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +7.5% | +15.1% | +18.1% | +28.7% | +46.7% | +96.0% | +174% | +119% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | — | $25B | — |
| CELH Beverages - Non-AlcoholicCelsius Holdings, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +6.9% | +1.8% | −11.3% | −37.3% | −53.5% | −44.5% | −4.3% | +4,120% | 66.2% | 0.32 | −77.9% | — | $7.6B | — |
| KO Beverages - Non-AlcoholicThe Coca-Cola Company | 4/5 short0/3 long | +7.3% | +14.5% | +25.4% | +37.9% | +40.2% | +86.8% | +98.2% | +204% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | — | $402B | — |
| KDP Beverages - Non-AlcoholicKeurig Dr Pepper Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +13.9% | +14.6% | +32.5% | +27.8% | +28.7% | +31.9% | +13.4% | +281% | 22.1% | 0.23 | −36.9% | — | $47B | — |
| ABEV Beverages - AlcoholicAmbev S.A. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +11.8% | +8.1% | +8.9% | +35.5% | +53.0% | +62.0% | +60.4% | −21.1% | 30.2% | 0.46 | −72.4% | — | $52B | — |
| MNST Beverages - Non-AlcoholicMonster Beverage Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +6.9% | −1.4% | +21.8% | +23.5% | +34.9% | +88.2% | +121% | +285% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | — | $92B | — |
| FMX Beverages - Non-AlcoholicFomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +9.3% | +0.8% | +15.1% | +36.5% | +44.0% | +53.7% | +92.9% | +79.7% | 25.7% | 0.64 | −45.5% | — | $44B | — |
| FIZZ Beverages - Non-AlcoholicNational Beverage Corp. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +11.9% | +12.8% | +14.7% | +22.7% | +6.7% | −5.6% | −21.8% | +108% | 29.9% | -0.02 | −69.6% | — | $3.3B | — |
| BALL Packaging & ContainersBall Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +7.5% | +3.4% | +0.9% | +21.4% | +33.6% | +51.5% | −25.9% | +78.6% | 30.6% | -0.04 | −55.1% | — | $17B | — |
| CCK Packaging & ContainersCrown Holdings, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +4.9% | −0.2% | +10.1% | +10.5% | +22.3% | +50.9% | +14.4% | +121% | 29.0% | 0.24 | −48.3% | — | $12B | — |
| MDLZ Food ConfectionersMondelez International, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +7.3% | +7.1% | +13.6% | +22.4% | +5.5% | +9.2% | +21.5% | +93.4% | 20.2% | 0.29 | −29.8% | — | $82B | — |
| PEP Beverages - Non-AlcoholicPepsiCo, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.4% | 0.0% | −12.8% | −2.9% | −9.2% | −6.7% | −2.3% | +72.6% | 19.1% | 0.07 | −30.3% | — | $183B | — |
| AMCR Packaging & ContainersAmcor plc | 0/5 short0/3 long | +6.1% | +5.0% | +10.7% | +11.1% | +16.5% | +23.9% | −4.6% | — | 25.7% | 0.09 | −47.2% | — | $21B | — |
How did CCEP do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where CCEP ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with CCEP and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- CCEP finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 15 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, CELH came out ahead of CCEP most often, in 12 of the 18 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CCEP finished in the top quarter in six of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in six. In 2025, it ranked 8 of 15.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of CCEP; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places CCEP among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of CCEP | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP This pageCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC | — | +21.2% | +18.3% | +24.5% | +2.3% | +15.6% | +0.5% | +13.8% | +18.6% | +30.0% | −9.3% | +14.0% | +2.5% | +42.0% | +26.0% | +5.0% | +74.8% | +79.5% | −52.9% | +28.7% | +7.6% | −7.4% | −3.9% | +1.8% | +15.4% | +0.2% | −4.9% | −43.3% | +1.0% | +121% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 29 | 8 of 15 | 2 of 15 | 5 of 15 | 10 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 11 of 15 | 11 of 14 | 3 of 14 | 5 of 14 | 12 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 2 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 1 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 12 of 13 | 5 of 12 | 11 of 12 | 8 of 12 | 11 of 12 | 10 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 6 of 11 | 7 of 11 | 11 of 11 | 5 of 10 | 1 of 9 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 14 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +22.6% | +38.7% | +82.9% | −17.1% | +133% | −5.9% | +60.7% | −15.0% | +23.2% | −1.4% | +109% | +22.1% | +11.9% | +14.9% | +7.4% | +5.0% | +20.0% | −20.1% | −12.4% | +62.4% | −23.2% | +10.0% | −16.1% | +73.3% | +2.8% | −18.0% | −16.0% | −16.3% | +41.7% |
| KOF Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. | 15 of 29 | +27.1% | −13.8% | +45.1% | +29.8% | +24.9% | −19.8% | +2.5% | −10.1% | +12.4% | −8.2% | −16.1% | −27.5% | −17.0% | +59.5% | +18.3% | +27.5% | +53.2% | −10.9% | +31.0% | +42.4% | +15.2% | +13.2% | +18.7% | −9.5% | −9.3% | +28.5% | +33.8% | −31.0% | +102% |
| CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | 12 of 18 | +73.7% | −51.7% | +57.2% | +39.5% | +48.2% | +942% | +38.8% | −33.7% | +114% | +26.3% | +288% | +47.1% | +70.0% | −4.8% | −50.0% | −91.7% | +534% | −75.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 13 of 29 | +15.6% | +8.9% | −4.4% | +10.6% | +11.4% | +2.5% | +20.6% | +6.8% | +14.3% | −0.3% | +5.2% | +5.3% | +17.2% | +6.5% | +9.5% | +19.0% | +30.4% | −24.0% | +30.4% | +23.2% | −0.8% | −16.2% | +18.2% | −5.5% | −21.9% | +6.1% | −12.2% | +1.3% | +27.9% |
| KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. | 9 of 17 | −10.1% | −1.1% | −4.2% | −1.2% | +17.5% | +13.1% | +15.4% | +70.3% | +25.4% | +12.7% | +51.5% | +74.9% | +36.4% | +37.5% | +37.5% | +44.3% | +80.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ABEV Ambev S.A. | 14 of 28 | +42.4% | −30.1% | +8.8% | +2.3% | −4.7% | −32.8% | +21.9% | −37.7% | +33.5% | +14.1% | −25.3% | −11.1% | −10.6% | +49.9% | +15.1% | +57.3% | +150% | −43.8% | +57.3% | +37.6% | −22.8% | +155% | +64.1% | −21.7% | −26.1% | +123% | +23.3% | −28.0% | — |
| MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 17 of 29 | +45.9% | −8.8% | +13.5% | +5.7% | +3.9% | +45.5% | +29.1% | −22.2% | +42.7% | −10.7% | +37.5% | +59.8% | +28.1% | +14.8% | +76.1% | +36.3% | +14.3% | −24.3% | +31.2% | +72.0% | +332% | +332% | +99.5% | +0.5% | +8.4% | −10.1% | −19.8% | +197% | +70.6% |
| FMX Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. | 11 of 27 | +26.8% | −32.0% | +70.1% | +2.9% | +4.0% | −17.8% | +11.7% | −6.9% | +25.1% | −16.2% | +6.5% | −10.1% | +0.4% | +46.8% | +26.9% | +18.3% | +60.6% | −20.2% | 0.0% | +61.3% | +39.4% | +44.2% | +2.3% | +7.0% | +17.1% | −31.8% | +68.9% | — | — |
| FIZZ National Beverage Corp. | 15 of 29 | −25.3% | −8.0% | +6.9% | +2.6% | +13.4% | +77.1% | −28.9% | −23.9% | +93.8% | +15.7% | +101% | +12.2% | +38.3% | +5.9% | +22.4% | +23.9% | +53.9% | +12.1% | −26.3% | +60.4% | +17.6% | +12.0% | +6.4% | +29.4% | +32.1% | +8.7% | −11.8% | −7.6% | +12.8% |
| BALL Ball Corporation | 15 of 29 | −2.4% | −3.0% | +14.2% | −46.2% | +4.1% | +45.2% | +41.9% | +22.7% | +1.8% | +3.9% | +7.5% | +33.1% | +16.7% | +26.5% | +5.7% | +32.4% | +25.5% | −6.7% | +4.1% | +10.8% | −8.9% | +49.0% | +17.5% | +45.8% | +55.1% | +19.1% | −12.5% | +30.9% | +37.5% |
| CCK Crown Holdings, Inc. | 11 of 29 | +25.9% | −9.1% | +13.3% | −25.0% | +11.3% | +38.1% | +74.5% | −26.1% | +7.0% | +3.7% | −0.4% | +14.2% | +21.1% | +9.6% | +0.6% | +30.4% | +33.3% | −25.1% | +22.6% | +7.1% | +42.1% | +51.8% | +13.9% | +213% | −65.9% | −64.3% | −24.8% | −37.0% | −6.0% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 12 of 24 | −7.0% | −15.3% | +11.2% | +2.9% | +15.9% | +8.6% | +40.4% | −4.3% | −1.6% | +0.6% | +25.4% | +4.6% | +41.7% | +121% | +24.7% | +22.8% | +8.8% | −13.0% | −4.1% | +32.6% | −17.3% | +14.4% | −14.4% | +16.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 13 of 29 | −1.8% | −7.6% | −3.3% | +6.8% | +20.5% | +11.7% | +27.4% | −4.8% | +17.8% | +7.8% | +8.8% | +17.3% | +24.6% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +14.6% | −26.0% | +23.8% | +7.9% | +15.3% | +13.8% | +12.1% | −12.2% | −0.6% | +42.6% | −12.4% | +14.3% | +25.7% |
| AMCR Amcor plc | 2 of 6 | −6.2% | +2.6% | −15.0% | +3.2% | +6.2% | +13.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How CCEP has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were CCEP's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents CCEP's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of CCEP's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CCEP fell 29.5% from June 2021 to March 2022, while the S&P 500 slipped only 0.2%.
- The slowest recovery came after CCEP fell 46.3% from August 1987 to August 1992; it did not regain that peak until February 1995, two years later.
Green means CCEP fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | CCEP fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −79.5% | −20.7% | Apr 1998 | Nov 2008 | 10.6 years | Nov 2010 | 2 years |
| Covid crash | −48.8% | −24.4% | Oct 2019 | Mar 2020 | 5 months | Apr 2021 | 13 months |
| No named crash | −46.3% | — | Aug 1987 | Aug 1992 | 5 years | Feb 1995 | 2.5 years |
| 2022 bear market | −29.5% | −0.2% | Jun 2021 | Mar 2022 | 9 months | Mar 2023 | 12 months |
| No named crash | −23.5% | +2.0% | Sep 2016 | Dec 2016 | 3 months | May 2017 | 5 months |
How did CCEP do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far CCEP, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, KDP held up best, falling less than CCEP in six of the eight crashes they both traded through.
- CCEP fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the late-2018 sell-off, when CCEP fell 7.4% and the S&P 500 fell 19.3%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than CCEP.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP This pageCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC | — | −1.5% | −28.2% | −47.6% | −7.4% | −2.9% | −13.8% | −20.4% | −0.6% | −71.0% | −40.3% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −4.5% | −35.5% | −30.4% | −21.3% | −8.5% | −28.4% | −21.5% | −1.8% | −48.4% | −37.8% |
| KOF Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. | 5 of 10 | −4.9% | −12.4% | −40.1% | −10.3% | −7.0% | −19.3% | −14.2% | −0.4% | −57.7% | −35.1% |
| CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −7.4% | −41.3% | −51.8% | −26.2% | −13.9% | −40.9% | −50.0% | 0.0% | −95.3% | — |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 7 of 10 | −1.4% | −16.7% | −37.0% | −8.8% | −7.8% | −8.8% | −8.3% | 0.0% | −40.6% | −31.3% |
| KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. | 6 of 8 | −1.5% | −12.2% | −33.5% | −13.6% | −1.7% | −9.7% | −13.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| ABEV Ambev S.A. | 5 of 10 | −2.7% | −25.8% | −42.9% | −18.8% | −4.4% | −30.4% | −17.6% | 0.0% | −60.4% | −52.7% |
| MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 4 of 10 | −2.9% | −25.9% | −27.6% | −20.1% | −7.0% | −25.7% | −14.6% | −12.4% | −69.2% | −50.4% |
| FMX Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. | 3 of 10 | −3.9% | −28.7% | −39.6% | −18.2% | −8.2% | −16.4% | −16.0% | −0.5% | −61.0% | −48.5% |
| FIZZ National Beverage Corp. | 4 of 10 | −2.6% | −33.1% | −19.5% | −36.1% | −12.0% | −30.3% | −10.1% | −1.1% | −31.0% | −34.6% |
| BALL Ball Corporation | 3 of 10 | −5.6% | −50.7% | −33.9% | −16.0% | −3.7% | −15.5% | −23.5% | −2.5% | −49.4% | −34.8% |
| CCK Crown Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −5.7% | −38.2% | −44.8% | −22.9% | −10.1% | −18.1% | −24.9% | −2.5% | −52.1% | −94.7% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −0.5% | −18.3% | −29.3% | −12.3% | −7.4% | −22.3% | −7.4% | 0.0% | −38.2% | — |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −0.8% | −11.9% | −28.3% | −12.3% | −7.2% | −10.2% | −8.3% | −0.2% | −40.4% | −33.0% |
| AMCR Amcor plc | 2 of 3 | −1.9% | −20.7% | −41.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does CCEP move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares CCEP with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, CCEP captured 69% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 56% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.66. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- KDP took just 38% of the S&P 500's losses, against 56% for CCEP, while still keeping 59% of its gains.
- Four of the 13 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CCEP's 1.25, led by COKE, KDP and CELH.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than CCEP's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP This pageCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC | 69% | 56% | 1.25 | 0.66 |
| COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 123% | 60% | 2.05 | 0.81 |
| KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. | 59% | 38% | 1.56 | 0.56 |
| CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | 195% | 127% | 1.54 | 1.54 |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 57% | 44% | 1.29 | 0.47 |
| MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 87% | 87% | 0.99 | 0.80 |
| KOF Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. | 63% | 73% | 0.86 | 0.68 |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 45% | 55% | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| FMX Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. | 50% | 63% | 0.80 | 0.72 |
| CCK Crown Holdings, Inc. | 69% | 91% | 0.76 | 0.87 |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 48% | 65% | 0.75 | 0.48 |
| FIZZ National Beverage Corp. | 73% | 99% | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| BALL Ball Corporation | 51% | 73% | 0.70 | 0.74 |
| ABEV Ambev S.A. | 49% | 121% | 0.41 | 0.85 |
What diversifies CCEP?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with CCEP's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing CCEP with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in CCEP into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+16.6% for CCEP alone, +17.5% for the mix).
- XLE made money in five of the six calendar years in which CCEP lost money.
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and SMH have moved largely independently of CCEP over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which CCEP lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% CCEP and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2016 | 2008 | 2005 | 2004 | 2000 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (this page) | 1.00 | +146% | 0.90 | −9.3% | −52.9% | −7.4% | −3.9% | −4.9% | −43.3% | 23.3% | +16.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.39 | +225% | 1.34 | +1.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 19.8% | +19.1% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.46 | +101% | 1.04 | +29.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.2% | +16.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18 | +323% | 0.97 | +35.6% | −44.7% | +10.8% | −19.3% | — | — | 21.1% | +21.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.22 | +126% | 0.96 | +8.0% | +4.9% | +17.8% | — | — | — | 19.7% | +17.5% |
| DIVO Dividend & IncomeAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 0.47 | +69.0% | 0.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.9% | +16.0% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.27 | +136% | 0.93 | +7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.2% | +18.2% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.19 | +177% | 0.93 | +28.0% | −39.0% | +40.1% | +33.8% | +24.4% | +18.1% | 20.3% | +18.8% |
| FDVV Dividend & IncomeFidelity High Dividend ETF | 0.49 | +85.9% | 0.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.3% | +16.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2016 | 2008 | 2005 | 2004 | 2000 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (this page) | 1.00 | +146% | 0.90 | −9.3% | −52.9% | −7.4% | −3.9% | −4.9% | −43.3% | 23.3% | +16.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.31 | +479% | 1.55 | −17.5% | −39.6% | +18.7% | −4.7% | +108% | −36.8% | 20.9% | +21.4% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.04 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +7.4% | −20.5% | −25.2% | −6.4% | −2.3% | +350% | 22.5% | +34.9% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.20 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +18.3% | −15.2% | +20.1% | +40.0% | −71.1% | −58.7% | 22.3% | +30.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.37 | +413% | 1.44 | −28.3% | −40.4% | +64.9% | −1.4% | +61.2% | −71.3% | 21.1% | +20.7% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.08 | +690% | 1.41 | +0.7% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.3% | +23.8% |
Common questions
What was CCEP's worst drawdown?
CCEP's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 79.5%, from April 1998 to November 2008. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were CCEP's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, CCEP's best year was 1997, when it returned 121%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -52.9%.
Is there a better investment than CCEP?
Among CCEP's popular alternatives, COKE was ahead of CCEP in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.0% volatility against 23.2%). Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CCEP with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ and DBJP.
Is CCEP more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. CCEP's volatility over the past 5 years was 23.2%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CCEP's return lands within 23.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is CCEP's Sharpe ratio?
CCEP's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.90, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CCEP earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is CCEP with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, CCEP's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.34 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CCEP instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CCEP holding.
What are the best alternatives to CCEP?
Of the 14 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed CCEP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: COKE.
Did CCEP outperform the S&P 500?
CCEP finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 15 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +21.2%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did CCEP do in stock market crashes?
CCEP fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the late-2018 sell-off, when CCEP fell 7.4% and the S&P 500 fell 19.3%.
What diversifies CCEP?
These had a low correlation with CCEP over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.39), EMLP (correlation 0.46) and SMH (correlation 0.18); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.31), CLS (correlation 0.04) and FIX (correlation 0.20). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than CCEP's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of CCEP's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to CCEP
KOCoca-Cola
KDPKeurig Dr Pepper
ABEVAmbev
MNSTMonster Beverage
FMXFomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V.
MDLZMondelez International
PEPPepsiCo