Relative Intelligence · Energy Equity

How State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on XLE alone. It places XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where XLE stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: XLE's full trading record, from December 1998 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- What you're buyingXLE is a energy bet first: 100% of assets, versus 4% in the S&P 500. At a glance ↓
- Right nowXLE has run far ahead of the market, rising 25.1% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its similar funds were far apart over the past 6 months, from IEO (iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF, up 36.4%) to AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF, up 6.6%). Consistency ↓
- Fund or market?XLE rose 18.0% over the past 3 months while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: XLE rose 8.8% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Long termXLE turned $10,000 into $28,900 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: XLE rose 177% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, XLE has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. The Covid crash took 56.3% off XLE, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF, 55.1%) but less than AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF, 63.7%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, XLE has a correlation of 0.29 over 5 years, less closely than 94% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. XLE's link to the S&P 500 has loosened: a correlation of 0.29 over the past 5 years, down from 0.75 in the 5 years before. Market capture ↓
- Better optionsFew investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than XLE with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them ABBV (AbbVie), WELL (Welltower) and WMB (Williams Companies). Better options ↓
How much would $10,000 in XLE have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in XLE over the past 24 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of XLE over the same span and XLE's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: The chart covers the past 24 years rather than XLE's full 27 years, because most of its popular alternatives have not traded that long.
- $10,000 invested in XLE at the end of September 2002 would have grown to $111,825 by September 2026, less than the $144,215 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of XLE, and WMB finished highest, at $2,934,958.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2002 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 640 of the 1,370 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of XLE; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- WMB$3M+29,250% total · +26.7% a year
- GWW$431,509+4,215% total · +17.0% a year
- WELL$280,457+2,705% total · +14.9% a year
- COR$234,223+2,242% total · +14.0% a year
- NHC$219,973+2,100% total · +13.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$144,215+1,342% total · +11.8% a year
- XLE$111,825+1,018% total · +10.6% a year
- XLB$92,414+824% total · +9.7% a year
- IXP$86,960+770% total · +9.4% a year
- IXC$79,459+695% total · +9.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 392 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of XLE; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- NHC$35,792+258% total · +29.0% a year
- GWW$33,303+233% total · +27.2% a year
- DXJ$32,976+230% total · +27.0% a year
- XOM$32,965+230% total · +26.9% a year
- XLE$28,160+182% total · +23.0% a year
- USO$27,713+177% total · +22.6% a year
- IEO$26,205+162% total · +21.2% a year
- ENFR$24,434+144% total · +19.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
XLE at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the fund, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- XLE's deepest decline since it began trading in 1998 was 71.3%, from June 2014 to March 2020. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- XLE is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 27 full calendar years, XLE's best was 2022, when it returned 64.4%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 38.9%. It lost money in nine of those years.
The fund
- Issuer
- SPDR
- Began trading
- December 1998
- Expense ratio
- 0.08%per year
- Assets
- $44B
- Category
- Energy
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +60.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +65.6%+18.3% a year
- Past 5 years
- +177%+22.6% a year
- Past 10 years
- +189%+11.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +64.4%2022
- Worst calendar year
- −38.9%2008
- Losing years
- 9 of 27full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 25.5%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.93return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −71.3%Jun 2014 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
XLE against the whole market
Where XLE ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does XLE rank among all ETFs?
This section ranks XLE on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every ETF worth at least $100 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how XLE stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- XLE's 1-year return ranks in the top 1% of the 2,485 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with 1 year of history.
- XLE's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the bottom 5% of the 951 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed ETFs with at least $100M in assets that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller ETFs and leveraged funds are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | XLE | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +60.9% | 31 of 2,485 | top 1% |
| 3-year return | +65.6% | 875 of 1,949 | top 45% |
| 5-year return | +177% | 20 of 1,560 | top 1% |
| 10-year return | +189% | 325 of 958 | top 34% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 25.5% | 1,380 of 1,560 | bottom 13% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.93 | 175 of 1,560 | top 11% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −66.8% | 902 of 951 | bottom 6% |
What has beaten XLE on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). XLE sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than XLE with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Four stocks and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than XLE over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half XLE's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 25% less than XLE's 25.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.93 for XLE.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to XLE; faint dots are 3 more of the 5 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than XLE?
Investments that beat XLE over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than XLE with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them ABBV, WELL and WMB.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat XLE over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes, and, for funds, the same exposure at a lower expense ratio. It checks XLE's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than XLE follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than XLE's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× XLE's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than XLE's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with XLE?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | 1.00 | 0.08% | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.29 | 0.09% | |||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 262 of 3,614 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.42 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.92 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.25 | 0.48% | |
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.04 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.30 | — | ||
| On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatility | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.68 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.29 | 0.03% | ||
What these numbers mean for XLE
- Annual return
- XLE returned 22.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $27,700. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- XLE's volatility over the past 5 years was 25.5%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, XLE's return lands within 25.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- XLE's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.93, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so XLE earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- XLE's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 66.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 66.8% fall takes a 202% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, XLE's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.29 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against XLE instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a XLE holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 5 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than XLE with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with XLE | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.42 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.16 | — | |
| 3 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.25 | 0.48% |
| 4 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.20 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.68 | — |
XLE against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against XLE, compared period by period and year by year.
How do XLE's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at XLE, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 21 popular alternatives earned more than XLE over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, XLE returned 22.6% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (25.5% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than XLE with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| XLE This pageState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | +22.6% | 25.5% |
| USO United States Oil Fund, LP | +22.5% | 37.7% |
| VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | +22.0% | 25.8% |
| RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | +21.6% | 27.4% |
| IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | +21.5% | 29.9% |
| IYE iShares U.S. Energy ETF | +21.1% | 25.2% |
| IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | +20.7% | 23.2% |
| AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | +19.7% | 24.8% |
| ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | +18.4% | 19.1% |
| FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | +16.4% | 28.5% |
| AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | +16.1% | 18.9% |
| XOP State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | +15.9% | 32.9% |
| MLPA Global X - MLP ETF | +15.2% | 17.2% |
| IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | +13.1% | 35.4% |
| XES State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | +12.7% | 38.0% |
| OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | +12.7% | 35.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | +11.7% | 19.3% |
| IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | +8.0% | 19.3% |
| XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | +7.8% | 17.4% |
| XLB State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | +5.8% | 19.1% |
| IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | +5.1% | 24.4% |
| UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | −32.1% | 63.2% |
Has XLE consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares XLE with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than XLE helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 22 popular alternatives outperformed XLE in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was IEO.
- ENFR and IXC earned more for the risk they took than XLE (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than XLE over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (this page) | — | +8.8% | +18.0% | +25.1% | +51.9% | +60.9% | +65.6% | +177% | +189% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | 0.08% | $44B | — |
| IEO Broad MarketiShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 5/5 short1/3 long | +11.0% | +24.0% | +36.4% | +67.4% | +73.9% | +61.3% | +165% | +217% | 29.9% | 0.80 | −75.0% | 0.37% | $915M | — |
| USO CommoditiesUnited States Oil Fund, LP | 4/5 short1/3 long | +8.4% | +28.0% | +32.4% | +133% | +137% | +99.0% | +176% | +75.6% | 37.7% | 0.73 | −86.8% | 0.86% | $1.9B | — |
| ENFR Broad MarketAlerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −0.7% | −3.0% | +8.1% | +25.2% | +31.5% | +99.2% | +133% | +183% | 19.1% | 0.98 | −62.6% | 0.35% | $543M | — |
| IXC InternationaliShares Global Energy ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | +8.7% | +16.8% | +20.3% | +48.2% | +58.8% | +69.1% | +156% | +183% | 23.2% | 0.93 | −64.2% | 0.37% | $3.3B | — |
| IWC Broad MarketiShares Micro-Cap ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −6.8% | −6.0% | −1.8% | +12.6% | +13.8% | +97.3% | +28.0% | +161% | 24.4% | 0.33 | −47.2% | 0.60% | $1.2B | 5% |
| IXP CommunicationiShares Global Comm Services ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −5.2% | −0.5% | −4.9% | −3.1% | −3.6% | +79.8% | +47.2% | +143% | 19.3% | 0.50 | −43.9% | 0.37% | $601M | 0% |
| AMZA AlternativesInfraCap MLP ETF | 0/5 short1/3 long | −3.0% | +0.1% | +12.1% | +27.5% | +34.1% | +72.8% | +146% | +53.1% | 24.8% | 0.85 | −87.8% | 1.72% | $470M | 100% |
| XOP EnergyState Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 2/5 short0/3 long | +8.3% | +18.1% | +25.3% | +57.1% | +62.9% | +42.9% | +109% | +59.3% | 32.9% | 0.61 | −82.6% | 0.35% | $4.3B | 96% |
| VDE EnergyVanguard Energy ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | +8.1% | +16.4% | +22.5% | +49.8% | +58.4% | +63.8% | +171% | +174% | 25.8% | 0.90 | −69.3% | 0.09% | $13B | 100% |
| FENY EnergyFidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | +8.1% | +16.5% | +22.6% | +50.0% | +58.6% | +63.9% | +171% | +171% | 25.9% | 0.90 | −69.1% | 0.08% | $2.1B | 100% |
| XLB MaterialsState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.1% | +2.9% | −1.1% | +12.5% | +17.3% | +44.1% | +32.8% | +166% | 19.1% | 0.39 | −37.3% | 0.08% | $8.0B | 0% |
| IYE Broad MarketiShares U.S. Energy ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | +8.5% | +16.8% | +23.6% | +49.5% | +58.3% | +63.5% | +161% | +159% | 25.2% | 0.89 | −68.6% | 0.37% | $1.8B | — |
| RSPG EnergyInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | +6.0% | +13.7% | +20.5% | +47.9% | +58.3% | +62.4% | +165% | +158% | 27.4% | 0.85 | −73.2% | 0.40% | $663M | 100% |
| PDBC AlternativesInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.0% | +15.2% | +17.1% | +50.8% | +56.2% | +50.5% | +73.9% | +153% | 19.3% | 0.67 | −40.7% | 0.74% | $7.9B | — |
| XLU UtilitiesState Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.0% | −6.1% | −7.2% | −1.0% | −5.9% | +57.9% | +45.4% | +138% | 17.4% | 0.52 | −36.0% | 0.08% | $24B | 0% |
| FXN EnergyFirst Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 0/5 short0/3 long | +6.9% | +14.4% | +19.2% | +45.8% | +59.5% | +45.5% | +113% | +99.8% | 28.5% | 0.68 | −80.6% | 0.63% | $387M | 96% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.2% | −1.6% | +6.6% | +17.5% | +22.8% | +56.0% | +111% | +91.0% | 18.9% | 0.89 | −72.9% | 1.01% | $13B | 98% |
| MLPA EnergyGlobal X - MLP ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.2% | −1.3% | +6.5% | +17.3% | +22.5% | +50.6% | +103% | +80.0% | 17.2% | 0.91 | −74.3% | 0.77% | $2.3B | 97% |
| IEZ Broad MarketiShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.2% | +0.2% | −5.9% | +24.7% | +44.2% | +19.1% | +85.2% | −22.4% | 35.4% | 0.53 | −88.3% | 0.37% | $338M | — |
| OIH EnergyVanEck Oil Services ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.0% | +2.6% | −3.5% | +30.0% | +52.5% | +19.0% | +81.9% | −25.3% | 35.9% | 0.52 | −89.6% | 0.35% | $1.8B | 99% |
| XES EnergyState Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | −6.0% | −3.5% | −6.8% | +27.1% | +48.2% | +20.2% | +82.0% | −38.2% | 38.0% | 0.51 | −91.2% | 0.35% | $332M | 98% |
| UNG CommoditiesUnited States Natural Gas Fund LP | 0/5 short0/3 long | +2.3% | +2.0% | −3.2% | −12.9% | −18.8% | −61.3% | −85.6% | −92.9% | 63.2% | -0.30 | −93.9% | 1.17% | $463M | — |
How did XLE do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1999, along with where XLE ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with XLE and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- XLE finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 11 of its 27 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, XLE finished in the top quarter in seven of 24 years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 6 of 22.
- Among its popular alternatives, IWC came out ahead of XLE most often, in 13 of the 20 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of XLE; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places XLE among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of XLE | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLE This pageState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | — | +7.9% | +5.6% | −0.6% | +64.4% | +53.3% | −32.7% | +11.7% | −18.2% | −0.9% | +28.0% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +26.3% | +5.2% | +2.8% | +21.9% | +21.8% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +18.0% | +40.1% | +33.8% | +25.9% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +24.4% | +18.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 24 | 6 of 22 | 12 of 22 | 17 of 22 | 3 of 22 | 7 of 22 | 11 of 22 | 10 of 22 | 10 of 22 | 10 of 22 | 7 of 22 | 5 of 22 | 8 of 20 | 8 of 19 | 4 of 18 | 4 of 18 | 7 of 17 | 12 of 17 | 6 of 17 | 7 of 15 | 7 of 9 | 2 of 8 | 2 of 7 | 5 of 7 | 4 of 7 | — | — | — |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 16 of 27 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% |
| IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 6 of 19 | +2.1% | −1.5% | +3.6% | +57.8% | +75.6% | −32.8% | +9.6% | −19.4% | +0.3% | +25.0% | −24.6% | −12.3% | +30.8% | +4.2% | −3.2% | +18.6% | +41.0% | −41.9% | +39.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| USO United States Oil Fund, LP | 5 of 19 | −8.5% | +13.4% | −4.9% | +29.0% | +64.7% | −67.8% | +32.6% | −19.6% | +2.5% | +6.6% | −46.0% | −42.4% | +5.8% | −12.4% | −2.3% | −0.7% | +18.7% | −56.3% | +46.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 7 of 12 | +5.9% | +42.2% | +15.6% | +17.5% | +40.0% | −24.1% | +21.7% | −18.7% | −0.2% | +42.1% | −37.1% | +12.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 11 of 24 | +14.0% | +2.0% | +3.9% | +48.5% | +40.8% | −31.0% | +12.7% | −14.8% | +5.5% | +27.9% | −22.1% | −11.6% | +16.1% | +2.8% | +0.1% | +11.8% | +24.7% | −36.8% | +29.8% | +20.9% | +29.5% | +26.6% | +30.2% | −5.7% | — | — | — |
| IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | 13 of 20 | +22.4% | +13.6% | +9.0% | −21.9% | +18.7% | +20.9% | +22.2% | −13.1% | +12.8% | +20.6% | −5.0% | +3.6% | +45.2% | +19.5% | −9.8% | +29.6% | +23.7% | −39.0% | −9.0% | +14.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | 12 of 24 | +29.3% | +31.3% | +38.8% | −33.0% | +12.8% | +22.1% | +25.2% | −13.7% | +6.7% | +5.5% | −0.1% | −1.4% | +24.1% | +7.4% | +1.0% | +11.6% | +11.4% | −30.9% | +24.7% | +33.2% | −6.7% | +19.0% | +24.4% | −27.7% | — | — | — |
| AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 2 of 11 | +0.2% | +30.9% | +23.3% | +33.2% | +51.3% | −49.2% | +6.2% | −26.8% | −11.6% | +24.2% | −45.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XOP State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 6 of 19 | −2.2% | −1.0% | +3.6% | +45.4% | +66.8% | −36.4% | −9.4% | −28.1% | −9.5% | +38.3% | −35.8% | −29.4% | +27.9% | +3.9% | +0.9% | +28.6% | +40.1% | −42.7% | +36.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 6 of 21 | +7.1% | +6.8% | 0.0% | +62.9% | +56.3% | −33.0% | +9.3% | −19.9% | −2.5% | +29.2% | −23.2% | −9.9% | +25.8% | +3.4% | +2.8% | +21.1% | +25.5% | −39.6% | +34.6% | +19.0% | +39.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XLB State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 14 of 27 | +9.9% | +0.1% | +12.4% | −12.3% | +27.4% | +20.5% | +24.1% | −14.9% | +24.1% | +16.8% | −8.6% | +7.1% | +26.0% | +14.6% | −10.8% | +20.4% | +48.1% | −44.0% | +22.2% | +18.5% | +4.0% | +13.5% | +37.5% | −5.4% | +2.3% | −16.1% | +22.8% |
| IYE iShares U.S. Energy ETF | 5 of 25 | +7.3% | +6.1% | −2.2% | +60.2% | +53.4% | −33.5% | +10.0% | −19.4% | −1.8% | +25.5% | −22.2% | −9.7% | +25.7% | +4.3% | +3.7% | +18.9% | +19.3% | −37.2% | +35.7% | +20.2% | +34.7% | +31.7% | +27.6% | −16.1% | −12.3% | — | — |
| RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 9 of 19 | +7.0% | +6.1% | +4.5% | +58.0% | +57.8% | −32.4% | +13.4% | −24.7% | −6.4% | +37.8% | −28.8% | −14.9% | +27.9% | +4.7% | −1.3% | +26.1% | +44.7% | −48.3% | +40.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3 of 11 | +6.0% | +2.0% | −6.2% | +19.3% | +41.7% | −7.9% | +11.4% | −12.8% | +5.1% | +18.0% | −26.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 13 of 27 | +16.0% | +23.3% | −7.2% | +1.4% | +17.7% | +0.6% | +26.0% | +3.9% | +12.1% | +16.1% | −4.9% | +28.7% | +13.1% | +1.0% | +19.7% | +5.3% | +11.6% | −28.9% | +18.4% | +20.9% | +16.3% | +23.7% | +26.8% | −28.8% | −12.9% | +21.6% | −4.4% |
| FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 5 of 18 | +3.4% | +0.3% | +1.0% | +46.9% | +51.7% | −19.9% | −6.9% | −24.8% | −5.1% | +20.6% | −32.6% | −16.0% | +28.5% | +4.0% | −8.4% | +27.6% | +46.5% | −50.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 5 of 15 | +5.8% | +22.8% | +21.4% | +25.5% | +39.1% | −32.3% | +6.0% | −12.6% | −7.9% | +14.9% | −25.7% | +4.8% | +18.6% | +1.9% | +10.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MLPA Global X - MLP ETF | 4 of 13 | +5.8% | +20.4% | +15.9% | +27.1% | +39.7% | −34.0% | +11.9% | −15.7% | −8.3% | +20.6% | −30.0% | +4.1% | +17.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 5 of 19 | +7.5% | −8.2% | +4.4% | +65.7% | +16.1% | −43.0% | +1.8% | −42.5% | −18.2% | +28.4% | −26.9% | −21.9% | +28.1% | −1.1% | −7.6% | +31.8% | +63.6% | −58.7% | +42.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 5 of 24 | +6.8% | −10.5% | +3.2% | +66.2% | +21.2% | −41.2% | −3.4% | −45.0% | −19.7% | +27.8% | −24.6% | −23.5% | +25.9% | +4.3% | −17.3% | +19.5% | +62.7% | −60.7% | +36.2% | +8.8% | +52.0% | +37.9% | +8.8% | −5.5% | — | — | — |
| XES State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 5 of 19 | +5.9% | −5.5% | +6.7% | +62.0% | +12.0% | −43.4% | −9.0% | −47.0% | −21.9% | +28.4% | −36.6% | −34.7% | +27.1% | +0.6% | −5.3% | +30.1% | +67.8% | −57.6% | +38.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | 2 of 18 | −27.1% | −17.1% | −64.0% | +12.9% | +35.8% | −45.4% | −31.8% | +6.0% | −37.6% | +7.7% | −41.3% | −28.6% | +9.5% | −26.9% | −46.1% | −40.6% | −56.5% | −36.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How XLE has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were XLE's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents XLE's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1998, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of XLE's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: XLE fell 71.3% from June 2014 to March 2020, while the S&P 500 rose 36.6%.
- The slowest recovery came after XLE fell 57.4% from May 2008 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until May 2013, four years later.
Green means XLE fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | XLE fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −71.3% | +36.6% | Jun 2014 | Mar 2020 | 5.8 years | Mar 2022 | 2 years |
| 2008 financial crisis | −57.4% | −49.3% | May 2008 | Mar 2009 | 10 months | May 2013 | 4.2 years |
| Dot-com bust | −41.5% | −37.4% | May 2001 | Jul 2002 | 14 months | Jul 2004 | 2 years |
| 2022 bear market | −26.1% | −7.7% | Jun 2022 | Jul 2022 | 1 month | Nov 2022 | 4 months |
| No named crash | −20.1% | −16.1% | Nov 2024 | Apr 2025 | 5 months | Jan 2026 | 9 months |
How did XLE do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far XLE, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- XLE fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when XLE fell 56.3% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
- Among its popular alternatives, PDBC held up best, falling less than XLE in all six crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than XLE.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLE This pageState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | — | −4.7% | −26.1% | −56.3% | −30.1% | −8.0% | −26.8% | −28.8% | −1.9% | −57.4% | −41.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 0 of 9 | −6.0% | −30.6% | −61.0% | −38.9% | −8.4% | −35.7% | −34.9% | −3.1% | −66.4% | — |
| USO United States Oil Fund, LP | 2 of 9 | −2.8% | −31.3% | −58.2% | −42.2% | −9.0% | −50.4% | −23.6% | −1.8% | −80.5% | — |
| ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4 of 6 | −3.6% | −20.3% | −60.1% | −22.7% | −4.9% | −40.3% | — | — | — | — |
| IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 7 of 9 | −4.5% | −24.9% | −55.1% | −26.1% | −7.4% | −26.3% | −26.4% | 0.0% | −55.8% | — |
| IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | 4 of 9 | −8.4% | −27.8% | −42.9% | −27.1% | −4.5% | −22.6% | −28.5% | −3.4% | −63.8% | — |
| IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | 8 of 9 | −3.1% | −37.0% | −27.1% | −16.1% | −6.1% | −13.1% | −12.8% | 0.0% | −50.1% | — |
| AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 3 of 6 | −4.1% | −25.2% | −78.9% | −34.3% | −6.1% | −59.5% | — | — | — | — |
| XOP State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 0 of 9 | −7.3% | −33.2% | −60.3% | −45.8% | −8.8% | −41.1% | −38.6% | −3.4% | −67.7% | — |
| VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 0 of 9 | −5.2% | −26.6% | −56.7% | −32.3% | −8.1% | −27.7% | −29.3% | −1.9% | −58.2% | — |
| XLB State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 8 of 10 | −5.6% | −24.7% | −36.3% | −21.3% | −5.0% | −18.4% | −28.2% | −1.1% | −59.8% | −31.1% |
| IYE iShares U.S. Energy ETF | 2 of 9 | −4.7% | −25.6% | −56.8% | −31.5% | −8.1% | −27.1% | −27.9% | −1.6% | −55.8% | — |
| RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 0 of 9 | −5.9% | −28.4% | −61.6% | −36.5% | −8.7% | −34.1% | −33.7% | −2.9% | −65.5% | — |
| PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 6 of 6 | −1.3% | −23.4% | −27.1% | −21.9% | −5.2% | −25.7% | — | — | — | — |
| XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 9 of 10 | −2.3% | −20.7% | −35.5% | −8.7% | −4.7% | −10.7% | −11.0% | −0.5% | −46.4% | −52.6% |
| FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 1 of 9 | −6.2% | −24.5% | −61.5% | −40.8% | −9.0% | −37.5% | −36.9% | −1.7% | −72.5% | — |
| AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 5 of 7 | −2.8% | −20.9% | −63.7% | −22.4% | −4.8% | −42.8% | −10.8% | — | — | — |
| MLPA Global X - MLP ETF | 4 of 6 | −2.2% | −18.8% | −66.1% | −23.9% | −5.4% | −42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 0 of 9 | −10.9% | −36.6% | −69.7% | −47.6% | −11.6% | −33.6% | −40.0% | −4.2% | −72.2% | — |
| OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 0 of 9 | −11.2% | −36.4% | −69.8% | −47.8% | −11.1% | −32.8% | −38.3% | −3.8% | −70.5% | — |
| XES State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 0 of 9 | −12.6% | −37.5% | −70.2% | −52.1% | −12.4% | −41.2% | −39.5% | −3.7% | −73.0% | — |
| UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | 4 of 9 | −6.3% | −41.2% | −18.0% | −27.0% | −9.0% | −50.6% | −19.7% | 0.0% | −75.1% | — |
How closely does XLE move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares XLE with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- IXC took just 94% of the S&P 500's losses, against 112% for XLE, while still keeping 81% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, XLE captured 90% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 112% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.05. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
- Four of the 21 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than XLE's 0.81, led by PDBC, XLU and IXC.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than XLE's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLE This pageState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 90% | 112% | 0.81 | 1.05 |
| PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 52% | 42% | 1.25 | 0.38 |
| XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 48% | 42% | 1.15 | 0.48 |
| IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 81% | 94% | 0.86 | 0.87 |
| ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 86% | 103% | 0.84 | 1.10 |
| IXP iShares Global Comm Services ETF | 82% | 102% | 0.80 | 0.86 |
| IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 100% | 127% | 0.79 | 1.24 |
| IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | 97% | 124% | 0.78 | 1.17 |
| VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 91% | 116% | 0.78 | 1.08 |
| XLB State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 91% | 116% | 0.78 | 0.99 |
| IYE iShares U.S. Energy ETF | 89% | 116% | 0.76 | 1.07 |
| RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 98% | 134% | 0.73 | 1.26 |
| AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 79% | 112% | 0.70 | 1.18 |
| MLPA Global X - MLP ETF | 78% | 115% | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| USO United States Oil Fund, LP | 71% | 105% | 0.67 | 0.64 |
| FXN First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund | 98% | 152% | 0.65 | 1.42 |
| AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 101% | 169% | 0.60 | 1.66 |
| XOP State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 95% | 162% | 0.59 | 1.46 |
| IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 111% | 226% | 0.49 | 1.71 |
| OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 109% | 226% | 0.48 | 1.73 |
| XES State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 109% | 237% | 0.46 | 1.75 |
| UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | -25% | 122% | -0.21 | 0.30 |
What diversifies XLE?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with XLE's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing XLE with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in XLE into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+23.0% for XLE alone, +22.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and DBEF have moved largely independently of XLE over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.33 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in six of the nine calendar years in which XLE lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which XLE lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% XLE and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2020 | 2018 | 2017 | 2015 | 2014 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +177% | 0.93 | −0.6% | −32.7% | −18.2% | −0.9% | −21.5% | −8.7% | −39.0% | −14.8% | −18.2% | 26.0% | +23.0% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.25 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +3.9% | −19.8% | +22.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −20.8% | — | — | 21.6% | +24.4% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.02 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | +55.5% | −9.1% | +38.5% | −0.3% | +30.2% | −44.7% | −47.0% | −14.6% | 21.8% | +27.6% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.33 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +20.1% | +2.1% | −9.5% | +16.7% | +4.1% | +3.4% | — | — | — | 21.7% | +21.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.10 | +126% | 0.96 | +12.7% | +24.8% | −1.9% | +12.8% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +4.9% | — | — | 21.4% | +22.9% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.15 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | +28.2% | −0.9% | +27.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 21.8% | +23.6% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.37 | +109% | 0.90 | +14.2% | −0.2% | −11.1% | +21.9% | −4.1% | +12.8% | — | — | — | 22.7% | +22.5% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.00 | +153% | 0.89 | +29.0% | +31.5% | −9.9% | +26.9% | −12.9% | +7.0% | −45.3% | −24.4% | +2.1% | 21.5% | +23.9% |
| EUFN InternationaliShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 0.33 | +133% | 0.89 | +26.1% | −8.5% | −23.1% | +27.0% | −4.7% | −9.7% | — | — | — | 22.5% | +23.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2020 | 2018 | 2017 | 2015 | 2014 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +177% | 0.93 | −0.6% | −32.7% | −18.2% | −0.9% | −21.5% | −8.7% | −39.0% | −14.8% | −18.2% | 26.0% | +23.0% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.17 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | +10.1% | −24.5% | −12.7% | +12.6% | +23.0% | −39.6% | −8.3% | −2.5% | 22.4% | +26.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.12 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | −2.4% | −16.3% | −11.6% | −6.0% | +12.9% | −20.5% | −65.1% | −25.6% | 25.1% | +40.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.16 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +6.7% | +0.8% | +32.1% | +67.7% | −10.4% | −15.2% | −9.4% | +73.7% | 23.9% | +36.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.39 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | +27.1% | −28.4% | +12.0% | −4.5% | +29.3% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | 23.3% | +26.0% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.26 | +594% | 1.36 | +37.8% | −7.2% | −37.5% | +48.4% | −36.3% | +50.9% | −67.4% | −33.1% | +9.8% | 23.5% | +29.1% |
Common questions
What was XLE's worst drawdown?
XLE's deepest decline since it began trading in 1998 was 71.3%, from June 2014 to March 2020. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were XLE's best and worst years?
Over 27 full calendar years, XLE's best year was 2022, when it returned 64.4%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -38.9%.
Is there a better investment than XLE?
Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than XLE with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them ABBV, WELL and WMB.
Is XLE more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. XLE's volatility over the past 5 years was 25.5%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, XLE's return lands within 25.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is XLE's Sharpe ratio?
XLE's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.93, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so XLE earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is XLE with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, XLE's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.29 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against XLE instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a XLE holding.
What are the best alternatives to XLE?
None of the 22 popular alternatives we compared outperformed XLE in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about XLE's strength than about its alternatives.
Did XLE outperform the S&P 500?
XLE finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 11 of 27 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +7.9%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did XLE do in stock market crashes?
XLE fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when XLE fell 56.3% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies XLE?
These had a low correlation with XLE over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.25), SMH (correlation -0.02) and DBEF (correlation 0.33); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.17), CLS (correlation 0.12) and FIX (correlation 0.16). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than XLE's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of XLE's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.