Relative Intelligence · Food & Beverages

How Coca-Cola (KO) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on KO alone. It places KO (The Coca-Cola Company) against 14 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where KO stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: KO's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, KO rose 25.4% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its food & beverage peers split over the past 6 months: KDP (Keurig Dr Pepper) rose 32.5%, while PEP (PepsiCo) fell 12.8%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?More than an industry move: KO rose 14.5% over the past 3 months, against 4.1% for the food & beverages ETF XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF). The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. KO rose 7.3% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsKO has run far ahead of the market, rising 40.2% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termKO turned $10,000 into $30,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. That said, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: KO rose 98.2% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashKO fell less than the S&P 500 in six of seven sell-offs, but the Covid crash broke the pattern: it fell 37.0%, more than the S&P 500's 33.7%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationKO is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.30 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.29 with the total US market, less closely than 69% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, KO's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.47: 57% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 44% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- COKE (Coca-Cola Consolidated), KOF (Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.) and COCO (Vita Coco) were ahead of KO in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.0%, 24.7% and 56.2% volatility against 16.8%).
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than KO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF).
How much would $10,000 in KO have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in KO over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of KO over the same span and KO's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in KO at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $60,026 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- All eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of KO, and MNST finished highest, at $45,663,831.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 700 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of KO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MNST$46M+456,538% total · +33.7% a year
- COST$727,732+7,177% total · +15.9% a year
- COKE$514,380+5,044% total · +14.6% a year
- FIZZ$407,992+3,980% total · +13.6% a year
- WMT$272,033+2,620% total · +12.1% a year
- STZ$228,856+2,189% total · +11.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- CCEP$129,076+1,191% total · +9.2% a year
- KOF$107,079+971% total · +8.5% a year
- KO$60,026+500% total · +6.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 905 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of KO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- COKE$50,300+403% total · +38.1% a year
- SHEL$25,892+159% total · +21.0% a year
- TRV$25,788+158% total · +20.9% a year
- KOF$23,968+140% total · +19.1% a year
- WMT$23,813+138% total · +18.9% a year
- LVHI$21,792+118% total · +16.9% a year
- CCEP$21,567+116% total · +16.6% a year
- COST$21,378+114% total · +16.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- KO$18,994+89.9% total · +13.7% a year
KO at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- KO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 55.5%, from July 1998 to March 2003. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- KO is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, KO's best was 2007, when it returned 30.4%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 24.0%. It lost money in eight of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $402B
- Industry
- Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +40.2%total return
- Past 3 years
- +86.8%+23.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +98.2%+14.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +204%+11.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +30.4%2007
- Worst calendar year
- −24.0%2008
- Losing years
- 8 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 16.8%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.91return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −55.5%Jul 1998 to Mar 2003
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
KO against the whole market
Where KO ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does KO rank among all stocks?
This section ranks KO on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how KO stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- KO is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | KO | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +40.2% | 726 of 3,287 | top 22% |
| 3-year return | +86.8% | 1,046 of 3,017 | top 35% |
| 5-year return | +98.2% | 695 of 2,893 | top 24% |
| 10-year return | +204% | 849 of 2,202 | top 39% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 16.8% | 32 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.91 | 163 of 2,893 | top 6% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −37.0% | 86 of 2,187 | top 4% |
What has beaten KO on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). KO sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than KO with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Two ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than KO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half KO's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 34% less than KO's 16.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.91 for KO.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to KO. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- The whole market
- 2 with more than 1.6× KO's volatility are in the table only
Is there a better investment than KO?
Investments that beat KO over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among KO's popular alternatives, COKE, KOF and COCO were ahead of KO in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.0%, 24.7% and 56.2% volatility against 16.8%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than KO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PVAL and LVHI.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat KO over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks KO's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than KO follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than KO's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× KO's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than KO's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with KO?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.30 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against KO. 3 of 14 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
COKECoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. · Food & Beverages | On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +41.2% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | +1,569% | 0.23 | — | |
KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Higher return in most periods | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.51 | — | |
COCOThe Vita Coco Company, Inc. · Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Higher return in most periods | +35.5% | 56.2% | 0.82 | −57.0% | — | — | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 13 of 3,583 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.46 | — | ||
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.62 | 0.40% | |
| Higher return in most periods | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.42 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.52 | — | ||
PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatility | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.44 | 0.56% | |
DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | On the frontierHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.19 | 0.45% | |
SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatility | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.31 | 0.80% | |
What these numbers mean for KO
- Annual return
- KO returned 14.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $19,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- KO's volatility over the past 5 years was 16.8%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, KO's return lands within 16.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- KO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.91, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so KO earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- KO's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 37.0%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 37.0% fall takes a 58.7% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, KO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.30 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against KO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a KO holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than KO with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with KO | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.62 | 0.40% |
| 2 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.44 | 0.56% |
KO against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against KO, compared period by period and year by year.
How do KO's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at KO, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 14 popular alternatives earned more than KO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Seven of the 14 popular alternatives earned less than KO over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, KO returned 14.7% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with lower volatility (16.8% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than KO with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | +41.2% | 38.0% |
| COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc. | +35.5% | 56.2% |
| KOF Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. | +22.3% | 24.7% |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | +20.8% | 22.6% |
| CCEP Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC | +19.7% | 23.2% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | +17.4% | 22.9% |
| MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | +17.2% | 24.9% |
| KO This pageThe Coca-Cola Company | +14.7% | 16.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| PRMB Primo Brands Corporation | +7.1% | 34.2% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | +4.0% | 20.2% |
| KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. | +2.5% | 22.1% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | −0.5% | 19.1% |
| CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | −0.9% | 66.2% |
| FIZZ National Beverage Corp. | −4.8% | 29.9% |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | −7.8% | 25.4% |
Has KO consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares KO with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than KO helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- COKE outperformed KO in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the 14 popular alternatives, COKE and COCO, outperformed KO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- WMT earned more for the risk it took than KO (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than KO over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| KO The Coca-Cola Company (this page) | — | +7.3% | +14.5% | +25.4% | +37.9% | +40.2% | +86.8% | +98.2% | +204% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | — | $402B | — |
| COKE QualifiedCoca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +12.3% | +17.3% | +14.9% | +42.9% | +61.7% | +255% | +461% | +1,569% | 38.0% | 1.10 | −51.7% | — | $14B | — |
| COCO QualifiedThe Vita Coco Company, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +7.9% | −16.4% | +30.1% | +15.5% | +48.4% | +152% | +357% | — | 56.2% | 0.82 | −57.0% | — | $3.5B | — |
| WMT Discount StoresWalmart Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | +9.7% | +5.3% | −7.5% | +5.2% | +11.0% | +130% | +158% | +508% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | — | $938B | — |
| CCEP Beverages - Non-AlcoholicCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC | 1/5 short3/3 long | +12.8% | +6.8% | +17.8% | +29.9% | +28.3% | +116% | +146% | +292% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | — | $50B | — |
| KOF Beverages - Non-AlcoholicCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. | 2/5 short2/3 long | +7.5% | +15.1% | +18.1% | +28.7% | +46.7% | +96.0% | +174% | +119% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | — | $25B | — |
| COST Discount StoresCostco Wholesale Corporation | 1/5 short2/3 long | +10.7% | +6.5% | 0.0% | +16.9% | +6.9% | +87.2% | +123% | +685% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | — | $441B | — |
| MNST Beverages - Non-AlcoholicMonster Beverage Corporation | 0/5 short2/3 long | +6.9% | −1.4% | +21.8% | +23.5% | +34.9% | +88.2% | +121% | +285% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | — | $92B | — |
| KDP Beverages - Non-AlcoholicKeurig Dr Pepper Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +13.9% | +14.6% | +32.5% | +27.8% | +28.7% | +31.9% | +13.4% | +281% | 22.1% | 0.23 | −36.9% | — | $47B | — |
| CELH Beverages - Non-AlcoholicCelsius Holdings, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +6.9% | +1.8% | −11.3% | −37.3% | −53.5% | −44.5% | −4.3% | +4,120% | 66.2% | 0.32 | −77.9% | — | $7.6B | — |
| FIZZ Beverages - Non-AlcoholicNational Beverage Corp. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +11.9% | +12.8% | +14.7% | +22.7% | +6.7% | −5.6% | −21.8% | +108% | 29.9% | -0.02 | −69.6% | — | $3.3B | — |
| STZ Beverages - AlcoholicConstellation Brands, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +12.1% | −0.4% | −15.7% | −4.0% | −3.3% | −38.5% | −33.2% | −6.6% | 25.4% | -0.19 | −56.0% | — | $22B | — |
| MDLZ Food ConfectionersMondelez International, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +7.3% | +7.1% | +13.6% | +22.4% | +5.5% | +9.2% | +21.5% | +93.4% | 20.2% | 0.29 | −29.8% | — | $82B | — |
| PRMB Beverages - Non-AlcoholicPrimo Brands Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.3% | −17.3% | −1.7% | +25.5% | −7.8% | +64.5% | +41.2% | +79.7% | 34.2% | 0.38 | −64.6% | — | $7.2B | — |
| PEP Beverages - Non-AlcoholicPepsiCo, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.4% | 0.0% | −12.8% | −2.9% | −9.2% | −6.7% | −2.3% | +72.6% | 19.1% | 0.07 | −30.3% | — | $183B | — |
How did KO do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where KO ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with KO and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- KO finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 11 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, KO finished in the top quarter in one of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in six. In 2025, it ranked 8 of 15.
- Among its popular alternatives, COST came out ahead of KO most often, in 22 of the 29 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of KO; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places KO among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of KO | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KO This pageThe Coca-Cola Company | — | +15.6% | +8.9% | −4.4% | +10.6% | +11.4% | +2.5% | +20.6% | +6.8% | +14.3% | −0.3% | +5.2% | +5.3% | +17.2% | +6.5% | +9.5% | +19.0% | +30.4% | −24.0% | +30.4% | +23.2% | −0.8% | −16.2% | +18.2% | −5.5% | −21.9% | +6.1% | −12.2% | +1.3% | +27.9% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 1 of 29 | 8 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 15 of 15 | 4 of 15 | 12 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 5 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 12 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 12 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 7 of 13 | 4 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 7 of 12 | 12 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 8 of 12 | 11 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 7 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 8 of 11 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 18 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +22.6% | +38.7% | +82.9% | −17.1% | +133% | −5.9% | +60.7% | −15.0% | +23.2% | −1.4% | +109% | +22.1% | +11.9% | +14.9% | +7.4% | +5.0% | +20.0% | −20.1% | −12.4% | +62.4% | −23.2% | +10.0% | −16.1% | +73.3% | +2.8% | −18.0% | −16.0% | −16.3% | +41.7% |
| COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc. | 4 of 4 | +43.6% | +43.9% | +85.6% | +23.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 17 of 29 | +24.5% | +74.0% | +12.9% | −0.5% | +1.9% | +23.4% | +30.1% | −3.4% | +46.6% | +16.1% | −26.6% | +11.8% | +18.2% | +17.1% | +13.8% | +3.1% | −2.5% | +20.0% | +4.9% | +0.2% | −10.2% | +0.6% | +5.6% | −11.8% | +8.9% | −22.7% | +70.5% | +107% | +74.6% |
| CCEP Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC | 15 of 29 | +21.2% | +18.3% | +24.5% | +2.3% | +15.6% | +0.5% | +13.8% | +18.6% | +30.0% | −9.3% | +14.0% | +2.5% | +42.0% | +26.0% | +5.0% | +74.8% | +79.5% | −52.9% | +28.7% | +7.6% | −7.4% | −3.9% | +1.8% | +15.4% | +0.2% | −4.9% | −43.3% | +1.0% | +121% |
| KOF Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. | 16 of 29 | +27.1% | −13.8% | +45.1% | +29.8% | +24.9% | −19.8% | +2.5% | −10.1% | +12.4% | −8.2% | −16.1% | −27.5% | −17.0% | +59.5% | +18.3% | +27.5% | +53.2% | −10.9% | +31.0% | +42.4% | +15.2% | +13.2% | +18.7% | −9.5% | −9.3% | +28.5% | +33.8% | −31.0% | +102% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 22 of 29 | −5.4% | +39.6% | +49.0% | −19.1% | +51.8% | +32.7% | +45.7% | +10.6% | +22.4% | +0.3% | +18.9% | +20.5% | +21.9% | +28.4% | +16.7% | +23.7% | +14.3% | −24.0% | +33.2% | +7.9% | +3.2% | +31.1% | +32.5% | −36.8% | +11.1% | −12.5% | +26.4% | +61.8% | +77.7% |
| MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 19 of 29 | +45.9% | −8.8% | +13.5% | +5.7% | +3.9% | +45.5% | +29.1% | −22.2% | +42.7% | −10.7% | +37.5% | +59.8% | +28.1% | +14.8% | +76.1% | +36.3% | +14.3% | −24.3% | +31.2% | +72.0% | +332% | +332% | +99.5% | +0.5% | +8.4% | −10.1% | −19.8% | +197% | +70.6% |
| KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. | 12 of 17 | −10.1% | −1.1% | −4.2% | −1.2% | +17.5% | +13.1% | +15.4% | +70.3% | +25.4% | +12.7% | +51.5% | +74.9% | +36.4% | +37.5% | +37.5% | +44.3% | +80.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | 12 of 18 | +73.7% | −51.7% | +57.2% | +39.5% | +48.2% | +942% | +38.8% | −33.7% | +114% | +26.3% | +288% | +47.1% | +70.0% | −4.8% | −50.0% | −91.7% | +534% | −75.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FIZZ National Beverage Corp. | 18 of 29 | −25.3% | −8.0% | +6.9% | +2.6% | +13.4% | +77.1% | −28.9% | −23.9% | +93.8% | +15.7% | +101% | +12.2% | +38.3% | +5.9% | +22.4% | +23.9% | +53.9% | +12.1% | −26.3% | +60.4% | +17.6% | +12.0% | +6.4% | +29.4% | +32.1% | +8.7% | −11.8% | −7.6% | +12.8% |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 18 of 29 | −36.0% | −7.1% | +5.8% | −6.4% | +16.1% | +17.4% | +19.8% | −28.7% | +50.7% | +8.7% | +46.2% | +39.5% | +98.9% | +71.2% | −6.7% | +39.0% | +1.1% | −33.3% | −18.5% | +10.6% | +12.8% | +41.3% | +38.8% | +10.7% | +46.0% | +14.9% | −11.7% | +4.5% | +94.0% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 14 of 24 | −7.0% | −15.3% | +11.2% | +2.9% | +15.9% | +8.6% | +40.4% | −4.3% | −1.6% | +0.6% | +25.4% | +4.6% | +41.7% | +121% | +24.7% | +22.8% | +8.8% | −13.0% | −4.1% | +32.6% | −17.3% | +14.4% | −14.4% | +16.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| PRMB Primo Brands Corporation | 17 of 29 | −45.9% | +115% | −1.0% | −10.2% | +14.0% | +41.9% | −18.1% | +13.3% | +4.2% | +57.1% | +93.9% | +73.6% | +154% | −58.5% | −78.6% | +73.4% | +540% | −80.8% | −53.4% | −2.7% | −40.5% | −11.7% | +57.2% | +12.1% | +108% | +45.3% | +48.6% | −57.9% | +17.1% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 14 of 29 | −1.8% | −7.6% | −3.3% | +6.8% | +20.5% | +11.7% | +27.4% | −4.8% | +17.8% | +7.8% | +8.8% | +17.3% | +24.6% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +14.6% | −26.0% | +23.8% | +7.9% | +15.3% | +13.8% | +12.1% | −12.2% | −0.6% | +42.6% | −12.4% | +14.3% | +25.7% |
Risk and diversification
How KO has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were KO's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents KO's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of KO's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: KO fell 25.3% from June to October 1997, while the S&P 500 slipped only 2.1%.
- The slowest recovery came after KO fell 55.5% from July 1998 to March 2003; it did not regain that peak until April 2011, eight years later.
Green means KO fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | KO fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −55.5% | −27.0% | Jul 1998 | Mar 2003 | 4.7 years | Apr 2011 | 8.1 years |
| No named crash | −41.1% | — | Aug 1987 | Oct 1987 | 2 months | Mar 1989 | 17 months |
| Covid crash | −37.0% | −32.8% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jul 2021 | 16 months |
| No named crash | −25.3% | −2.1% | Jun 1997 | Oct 1997 | 4 months | Mar 1998 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −21.3% | — | Jul 1990 | Aug 1990 | 1 month | Dec 1990 | 4 months |
How did KO do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far KO, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- KO fell less than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when KO fell 31.3% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than KO in most of the crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than KO.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KO This pageThe Coca-Cola Company | — | −1.4% | −16.7% | −37.0% | −8.8% | −7.8% | −8.8% | −8.3% | 0.0% | −40.6% | −31.3% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −4.5% | −35.5% | −30.4% | −21.3% | −8.5% | −28.4% | −21.5% | −1.8% | −48.4% | −37.8% |
| COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −6.1% | −40.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 4 of 10 | −0.8% | −25.7% | −13.1% | −18.3% | −4.9% | −22.3% | −10.5% | −1.5% | −26.2% | −31.8% |
| CCEP Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC | 2 of 10 | −1.5% | −28.2% | −47.6% | −7.4% | −2.9% | −13.8% | −20.4% | −0.6% | −71.0% | −40.3% |
| KOF Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. | 2 of 10 | −4.9% | −12.4% | −40.1% | −10.3% | −7.0% | −19.3% | −14.2% | −0.4% | −57.7% | −35.1% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2 of 10 | −3.1% | −31.4% | −13.7% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −15.2% | −13.5% | −1.2% | −48.0% | −50.1% |
| MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 2 of 10 | −2.9% | −25.9% | −27.6% | −20.1% | −7.0% | −25.7% | −14.6% | −12.4% | −69.2% | −50.4% |
| KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. | 3 of 8 | −1.5% | −12.2% | −33.5% | −13.6% | −1.7% | −9.7% | −13.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −7.4% | −41.3% | −51.8% | −26.2% | −13.9% | −40.9% | −50.0% | 0.0% | −95.3% | — |
| FIZZ National Beverage Corp. | 2 of 10 | −2.6% | −33.1% | −19.5% | −36.1% | −12.0% | −30.3% | −10.1% | −1.1% | −31.0% | −34.6% |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −3.8% | −16.3% | −49.3% | −31.1% | −3.3% | −12.4% | −22.5% | −5.5% | −58.4% | −30.2% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −0.5% | −18.3% | −29.3% | −12.3% | −7.4% | −22.3% | −7.4% | 0.0% | −38.2% | — |
| PRMB Primo Brands Corporation | 1 of 10 | −4.4% | −30.3% | −54.3% | −26.9% | −3.6% | −19.5% | −75.7% | 0.0% | −92.0% | −33.5% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −0.8% | −11.9% | −28.3% | −12.3% | −7.2% | −10.2% | −8.3% | −0.2% | −40.4% | −33.0% |
How closely does KO move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares KO with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, KO captured 57% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 44% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.47. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- WMT took just 36% of the S&P 500's losses, against 44% for KO, while still keeping 74% of its gains.
- Five of the 13 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than KO's 1.29, led by WMT, COKE and COST.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than KO's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KO This pageThe Coca-Cola Company | 57% | 44% | 1.29 | 0.47 |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 74% | 36% | 2.08 | 0.53 |
| COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 123% | 60% | 2.05 | 0.81 |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 93% | 50% | 1.85 | 0.77 |
| KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. | 59% | 38% | 1.56 | 0.56 |
| CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | 195% | 127% | 1.54 | 1.54 |
| CCEP Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC | 69% | 56% | 1.25 | 0.66 |
| MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 87% | 87% | 0.99 | 0.80 |
| KOF Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. | 63% | 73% | 0.86 | 0.68 |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 45% | 55% | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 48% | 65% | 0.75 | 0.48 |
| PRMB Primo Brands Corporation | 71% | 96% | 0.74 | 1.05 |
| FIZZ National Beverage Corp. | 73% | 99% | 0.73 | 0.94 |
| STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 48% | 111% | 0.44 | 0.79 |
What diversifies KO?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with KO's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing KO with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in KO into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 15% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+13.7% for KO alone, +16.5% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, EMLP and SMH have moved largely independently of KO over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in five of the eight calendar years in which KO lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which KO lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% KO and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2016 | 2008 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KO The Coca-Cola Company (this page) | 1.00 | +98.2% | 0.91 | −4.4% | −0.3% | −24.0% | −0.8% | −16.2% | −5.5% | −21.9% | −12.2% | 16.3% | +13.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.24 | +225% | 1.34 | +42.0% | +1.1% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 13.8% | +16.5% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.49 | +101% | 1.04 | +8.0% | +29.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.7% | +14.2% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.02 | +323% | 0.97 | +73.4% | +35.6% | −44.7% | +10.8% | −19.3% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 14.9% | +19.4% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.48 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +20.1% | +6.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.2% | +13.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.33 | +126% | 0.96 | +12.7% | +8.0% | +4.9% | +17.8% | — | — | — | — | 14.5% | +14.9% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.20 | +136% | 0.93 | +17.6% | +7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.4% | +15.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.33 | +177% | 0.93 | −0.6% | +28.0% | −39.0% | +40.1% | +33.8% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +18.1% | 15.5% | +16.1% |
| FDVV Dividend & IncomeFidelity High Dividend ETF | 0.48 | +85.9% | 0.92 | +18.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.7% | +14.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2023 | 2016 | 2008 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KO The Coca-Cola Company (this page) | 1.00 | +98.2% | 0.91 | −4.4% | −0.3% | −24.0% | −0.8% | −16.2% | −5.5% | −21.9% | −12.2% | 16.3% | +13.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.37 | +479% | 1.55 | +34.1% | −17.5% | −39.6% | +18.7% | −4.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | −36.8% | 15.8% | +18.7% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.12 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +160% | +7.4% | −20.5% | −25.2% | −6.4% | −65.1% | −25.6% | +350% | 16.4% | +32.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.10 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +79.6% | +18.3% | −15.2% | +20.1% | +40.0% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −58.7% | 16.5% | +27.9% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.31 | +413% | 1.44 | +24.1% | −28.3% | −40.4% | +64.9% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | −71.3% | 15.4% | +18.2% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.25 | +690% | 1.41 | +30.4% | +0.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15.9% | +20.9% |
Common questions
What was KO's worst drawdown?
KO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 55.5%, from July 1998 to March 2003. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were KO's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, KO's best year was 2007, when it returned 30.4%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -24.0%.
Is there a better investment than KO?
Among KO's popular alternatives, COKE, KOF and COCO were ahead of KO in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (38.0%, 24.7% and 56.2% volatility against 16.8%). Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than KO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PVAL and LVHI.
Is KO more volatile than the S&P 500?
No. KO's volatility over the past 5 years was 16.8%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, KO's return lands within 16.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is KO's Sharpe ratio?
KO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.91, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so KO earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is KO with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, KO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.30 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against KO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a KO holding.
What are the best alternatives to KO?
Of the 14 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed KO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: COKE and COCO.
Did KO outperform the S&P 500?
KO finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 11 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +15.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did KO do in stock market crashes?
KO fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in eight of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when KO fell 31.3% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies KO?
These had a low correlation with KO over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.24), EMLP (correlation 0.49) and SMH (correlation 0.02); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.37), CLS (correlation -0.12) and FIX (correlation 0.10). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than KO's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of KO's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to KO
WMTWalmart
CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners
COSTCostco Wholesale
MNSTMonster Beverage
KDPKeurig Dr Pepper
MDLZMondelez International
PEPPepsiCo