Relative Intelligence · Discount Retail

How Walmart (WMT) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on WMT alone. It places WMT (Walmart Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where WMT stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: WMT's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowWMT has gone against the market, falling 7.5% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. Its discount retail peers split over the past 6 months: AMZN (Amazon.com) rose 5.8%, while BURL (Burlington Stores) fell 25.6%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?WMT held up far better than its industry: it rose 5.3% over the past 3 months while the discount retail ETF XRT (State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF) fell 1.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Last month cut against the tape: WMT rose 9.7% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsWMT lagged its discount retail peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. That said, over the past year, WMT rose 11.0% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. Consistency ↓
- Long termWMT turned $10,000 into $60,800 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. WMT's 10-year return of 508% puts it ahead of 86% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashWMT fell less than the S&P 500 in five of seven sell-offs, but the 2015 China and oil sell-off broke the pattern: it fell 22.3%, more than the S&P 500's 12.8%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationOver 10 years WMT kept more of the market's gains than of its losses: 74% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 36% of its losses in falling ones, with a beta of 0.53. Against the S&P 500, WMT has a correlation of 0.43 over 5 years, more closely than 59% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better optionsFew investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WMT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund). Better options ↓
How much would $10,000 in WMT have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in WMT over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of WMT over the same span and WMT's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in WMT at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $272,033 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of WMT, and AMZN finished highest, at $11,484,924.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 231 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of WMT; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- ROST$1M+14,044% total · +18.6% a year
- TJX$958,745+9,487% total · +17.0% a year
- COST$727,732+7,177% total · +15.9% a year
- WELL$467,035+4,570% total · +14.2% a year
- WMT$272,033+2,620% total · +12.1% a year
- TGT$184,797+1,748% total · +10.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- PSMT$118,754+1,088% total · +8.9% a year
- KO$60,026+500% total · +6.4% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 560 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of WMT; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MPC$71,516+615% total · +48.2% a year
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- WELL$31,492+215% total · +25.8% a year
- MPLX$30,642+206% total · +25.1% a year
- ABBV$29,134+191% total · +23.8% a year
- WMT$23,813+138% total · +18.9% a year
- PSMT$23,465+135% total · +18.6% a year
- COST$21,378+114% total · +16.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- AMZN$15,169+51.7% total · +8.7% a year
WMT at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- WMT's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 50.6%, from August to December 1987. It took 19 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, WMT's best was 1998, when it returned 107%, and its worst was 2015, when it lost 26.6%. It lost money in seven of those years.
- WMT is 12.0% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $938B
- Industry
- Discount Stores
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +11.0%total return
- Past 3 years
- +130%+32.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- +158%+20.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +508%+19.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +107%1998
- Worst calendar year
- −26.6%2015
- Losing years
- 7 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 22.6%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.96return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −50.6%Aug 1987 to Dec 1987
- From its all-time high
- −12.0%below the peak
WMT against the whole market
Where WMT ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does WMT rank among all stocks?
This section ranks WMT on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how WMT stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- WMT's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 1% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | WMT | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +11.0% | 1,552 of 3,287 | top 47% |
| 3-year return | +130% | 705 of 3,017 | top 23% |
| 5-year return | +158% | 427 of 2,893 | top 15% |
| 10-year return | +508% | 301 of 2,202 | top 14% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 22.6% | 180 of 2,893 | top 6% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.96 | 126 of 2,893 | top 4% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −25.7% | 8 of 2,187 | top 1% |
What has beaten WMT on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). WMT sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than WMT with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- One stock and one ETF worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than WMT over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half WMT's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 16% less than WMT's 22.6%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.96 for WMT.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to WMT. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than WMT?
Investments that beat WMT over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WMT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX and DXJ.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat WMT over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks WMT's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than WMT follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than WMT's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× WMT's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than WMT's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with WMT?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.43 | 0.09% | |||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 72 of 3,552 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.07 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.44 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.38 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +19.0% | 32.0% | 0.71 | −44.6% | +752% | 0.27 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.24 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return in most periods | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.24 | 0.09% | ||
What these numbers mean for WMT
- Annual return
- WMT returned 20.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $25,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- WMT's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.6%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, WMT's return lands within 22.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- WMT's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.96, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so WMT earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- WMT's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 25.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 25.7% fall takes a 34.7% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, WMT's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.43 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against WMT instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a WMT holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than WMT with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with WMT | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.38 | — | |
| 2 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.24 | 0.48% |
WMT against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against WMT, compared period by period and year by year.
How do WMT's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at WMT, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives earned more than WMT over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 14 of the 20 popular alternatives earned less than WMT over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, WMT returned 20.8% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (22.6% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than WMT with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | +23.8% | 40.3% |
| WMT This pageWalmart Inc. | +20.8% | 22.6% |
| TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. | +19.9% | 22.3% |
| PSMT PriceSmart, Inc. | +18.6% | 28.2% |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | +18.1% | 29.5% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | +17.4% | 22.9% |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | +14.7% | 16.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| KR The Kroger Co. | +12.3% | 27.3% |
| BJ BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. | +11.9% | 32.5% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | +9.0% | 36.6% |
| OLLI Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. | +6.8% | 44.4% |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | +5.1% | 18.3% |
| DLTR Dollar Tree, Inc. | +4.3% | 40.1% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | +4.0% | 20.2% |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | −0.5% | 19.1% |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | −1.3% | 44.4% |
| TGT Target Corporation | −6.5% | 36.1% |
| ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc. | −6.7% | 30.4% |
| DG Dollar General Corporation | −7.4% | 37.0% |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | −8.6% | 28.9% |
| GO Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. | −10.8% | 49.4% |
Has WMT consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares WMT with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than WMT helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives outperformed WMT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was COST.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than WMT over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| WMT Walmart Inc. (this page) | — | +9.7% | +5.3% | −7.5% | +5.2% | +11.0% | +130% | +158% | +508% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | — | $938B | — |
| COST Discount StoresCostco Wholesale Corporation | 4/5 short1/3 long | +10.7% | +6.5% | 0.0% | +16.9% | +6.9% | +87.2% | +123% | +685% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | — | $441B | — |
| AMZN Specialty RetailAmazon.com, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +1.6% | +5.1% | +5.8% | +16.0% | +21.3% | +110% | +53.8% | +548% | 36.6% | 0.42 | −56.1% | — | $2.8T | — |
| PSMT Discount StoresPriceSmart, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +1.6% | −3.6% | +9.3% | +41.7% | +43.2% | +153% | +135% | +124% | 28.2% | 0.75 | −53.2% | — | $5.3B | — |
| SFM Grocery StoresSprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −5.7% | −13.3% | −13.0% | −19.7% | −41.4% | +52.7% | +191% | +202% | 40.3% | 0.74 | −65.2% | — | $6.0B | — |
| TGT Discount StoresTarget Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | −2.4% | +11.2% | +20.3% | +57.4% | +75.1% | +58.0% | −28.5% | +207% | 36.1% | 0.00 | −64.4% | — | $70B | — |
| KO Beverages - Non-AlcoholicThe Coca-Cola Company | 4/5 short0/3 long | +7.3% | +14.5% | +25.4% | +37.9% | +40.2% | +86.8% | +98.2% | +204% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | — | $402B | — |
| DG Discount StoresDollar General Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | +10.6% | +8.1% | +7.2% | 0.0% | +28.5% | +24.2% | −32.0% | +127% | 37.0% | -0.01 | −72.6% | — | $30B | — |
| BJ Discount StoresBJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +10.9% | +9.0% | +9.4% | +11.3% | +9.0% | +47.7% | +75.3% | — | 32.5% | 0.51 | −38.8% | — | $13B | — |
| GO Grocery StoresGrocery Outlet Holding Corp. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +15.9% | +40.3% | +66.7% | +28.0% | −17.4% | −52.8% | −43.5% | — | 49.4% | 0.01 | −87.6% | — | $1.3B | — |
| ROST Apparel - RetailRoss Stores, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +2.6% | +0.8% | +4.3% | +30.6% | +51.9% | +111% | +129% | +312% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | — | $76B | — |
| OLLI Discount StoresOllie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +16.3% | +37.4% | −1.1% | −16.8% | −23.3% | +23.8% | +38.9% | +238% | 44.4% | 0.37 | −66.2% | — | $5.5B | — |
| PG Household & Personal ProductsThe Procter & Gamble Company | 3/5 short0/3 long | +9.1% | +7.7% | +12.0% | +14.9% | +8.0% | +15.8% | +28.3% | +145% | 18.3% | 0.37 | −23.8% | — | $370B | — |
| MDLZ Food ConfectionersMondelez International, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +7.3% | +7.1% | +13.6% | +22.4% | +5.5% | +9.2% | +21.5% | +93.4% | 20.2% | 0.29 | −29.8% | — | $82B | — |
| DLTR Discount StoresDollar Tree, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +11.2% | −1.1% | +16.5% | −2.1% | +26.2% | +13.1% | +23.3% | +64.7% | 40.1% | 0.31 | −64.8% | — | $23B | — |
| KR Grocery StoresThe Kroger Co. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +5.5% | +8.7% | −6.1% | +1.8% | −6.9% | +52.6% | +78.5% | +151% | 27.3% | 0.56 | −43.8% | — | $37B | — |
| UPS Integrated Freight & LogisticsUnited Parcel Service, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +4.0% | −11.5% | −5.0% | +2.2% | +20.8% | −23.0% | −36.1% | +35.4% | 28.9% | -0.17 | −57.9% | — | $74B | — |
| TJX Apparel - RetailThe TJX Companies, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +12.3% | −5.3% | −7.3% | −3.8% | +3.8% | +71.6% | +147% | +361% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | — | $162B | — |
| ACI Grocery StoresAlbertsons Companies, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +11.1% | −8.6% | −17.0% | −19.5% | −28.6% | −33.6% | −29.2% | — | 30.4% | -0.07 | −54.7% | — | $6.5B | — |
| BURL Apparel - RetailBurlington Stores, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +2.8% | −26.5% | −25.6% | −13.2% | −3.1% | +112% | −6.2% | +240% | 44.4% | 0.19 | −68.9% | — | $16B | — |
| PEP Beverages - Non-AlcoholicPepsiCo, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +3.4% | 0.0% | −12.8% | −2.9% | −9.2% | −6.7% | −2.3% | +72.6% | 19.1% | 0.07 | −30.3% | — | $183B | — |
How did WMT do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where WMT ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with WMT and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- WMT finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 15 of its 29 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, COST came out ahead of WMT most often, in 20 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, WMT finished in the top quarter in eight of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in seven. In 2025, it ranked 5 of 21.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of WMT; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places WMT among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of WMT | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT This pageWalmart Inc. | — | +24.5% | +74.0% | +12.9% | −0.5% | +1.9% | +23.4% | +30.1% | −3.4% | +46.6% | +16.1% | −26.6% | +11.8% | +18.2% | +17.1% | +13.8% | +3.1% | −2.5% | +20.0% | +4.9% | +0.2% | −10.2% | +0.6% | +5.6% | −11.8% | +8.9% | −22.7% | +70.5% | +107% | +74.6% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 8 of 29 | 5 of 21 | 2 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 11 of 21 | 17 of 21 | 9 of 20 | 9 of 19 | 12 of 18 | 3 of 18 | 5 of 18 | 17 of 17 | 10 of 17 | 13 of 15 | 6 of 15 | 8 of 15 | 15 of 15 | 13 of 14 | 2 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 13 of 14 | 11 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 12 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 6 of 13 | 10 of 13 | 2 of 12 | 2 of 12 | 2 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 13 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 20 of 29 | −5.4% | +39.6% | +49.0% | −19.1% | +51.8% | +32.7% | +45.7% | +10.6% | +22.4% | +0.3% | +18.9% | +20.5% | +21.9% | +28.4% | +16.7% | +23.7% | +14.3% | −24.0% | +33.2% | +7.9% | +3.2% | +31.1% | +32.5% | −36.8% | +11.1% | −12.5% | +26.4% | +61.8% | +77.7% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 14 of 28 | +5.2% | +44.4% | +80.9% | −49.6% | +2.4% | +76.3% | +23.0% | +28.4% | +56.0% | +10.9% | +118% | −22.2% | +59.0% | +45.0% | −3.9% | +33.7% | +163% | −44.7% | +135% | −16.5% | +6.8% | −16.0% | +178% | +74.6% | −30.5% | −79.6% | +42.2% | +968% | — |
| PSMT PriceSmart, Inc. | 14 of 28 | +34.8% | +25.0% | +26.2% | −15.8% | −19.1% | +29.6% | +21.6% | −30.8% | +3.5% | +1.5% | −8.3% | −20.4% | +50.6% | +12.0% | +85.5% | +90.2% | +1.8% | −29.9% | +69.4% | +114% | +10.5% | +20.9% | −72.7% | −34.6% | +6.5% | −16.1% | +124% | +2.2% | — |
| SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 5 of 12 | −37.3% | +164% | +48.6% | +9.1% | +47.7% | +3.9% | −17.7% | −3.5% | +28.7% | −28.8% | −21.8% | −11.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TGT Target Corporation | 15 of 29 | −24.5% | −2.3% | −1.4% | −34.2% | +32.9% | +40.5% | +100% | +4.7% | −5.8% | +2.7% | −1.6% | +23.8% | +9.5% | +18.2% | −13.0% | +26.3% | +42.4% | −30.0% | −11.6% | +4.7% | +6.6% | +36.1% | +29.0% | −26.5% | +28.0% | −11.5% | +36.2% | +62.2% | +74.2% |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 12 of 29 | +15.6% | +8.9% | −4.4% | +10.6% | +11.4% | +2.5% | +20.6% | +6.8% | +14.3% | −0.3% | +5.2% | +5.3% | +17.2% | +6.5% | +9.5% | +19.0% | +30.4% | −24.0% | +30.4% | +23.2% | −0.8% | −16.2% | +18.2% | −5.5% | −21.9% | +6.1% | −12.2% | +1.3% | +27.9% |
| DG Dollar General Corporation | 11 of 16 | +79.6% | −43.1% | −44.1% | +5.6% | +13.0% | +35.9% | +45.7% | +17.6% | +26.9% | +4.3% | +2.9% | +17.2% | +36.8% | +7.1% | +34.2% | +36.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BJ BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. | 2 of 7 | +0.8% | +34.0% | +0.8% | −1.2% | +79.6% | +63.9% | +2.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GO Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. | 1 of 6 | −35.3% | −42.1% | −7.6% | +3.2% | −28.0% | +21.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 18 of 29 | +20.4% | +10.4% | +20.6% | +2.9% | −6.0% | +5.8% | +41.3% | +4.8% | +23.5% | +23.0% | +15.3% | +27.0% | +39.9% | +14.9% | +52.0% | +49.7% | +45.3% | +17.8% | −12.0% | +2.4% | +0.9% | +9.4% | +25.5% | +32.9% | +91.0% | −5.7% | −8.3% | +9.7% | +47.9% |
| OLLI Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −0.1% | +44.6% | +62.0% | −8.5% | −37.4% | +25.2% | −1.8% | +24.9% | +87.2% | +67.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 14 of 29 | −12.3% | +17.3% | −0.9% | −5.1% | +20.5% | +14.2% | +39.7% | +3.6% | +12.7% | +9.3% | −10.0% | +15.4% | +23.6% | +5.2% | +7.0% | +9.3% | +1.2% | −13.8% | +16.7% | +13.4% | +7.2% | +12.4% | +18.5% | +11.4% | +3.1% | −27.1% | +21.6% | +16.0% | +50.5% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 12 of 24 | −7.0% | −15.3% | +11.2% | +2.9% | +15.9% | +8.6% | +40.4% | −4.3% | −1.6% | +0.6% | +25.4% | +4.6% | +41.7% | +121% | +24.7% | +22.8% | +8.8% | −13.0% | −4.1% | +32.6% | −17.3% | +14.4% | −14.4% | +16.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| DLTR Dollar Tree, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +64.1% | −47.2% | +0.4% | +0.7% | +30.1% | +14.9% | +4.1% | −15.8% | +39.0% | −0.1% | +9.7% | +24.7% | +39.1% | −2.4% | +48.2% | +74.2% | +15.8% | +60.9% | −13.9% | +25.7% | −16.8% | −4.3% | +22.3% | −20.5% | +26.1% | −24.1% | +10.8% | +58.4% | +62.2% |
| KR The Kroger Co. | 12 of 29 | +4.2% | +36.9% | +5.0% | +0.4% | +45.4% | +11.9% | +7.9% | +2.1% | −19.0% | −16.4% | +31.8% | +64.8% | +54.5% | +9.6% | +10.5% | +10.7% | −20.9% | 0.0% | +17.0% | +23.4% | +7.6% | −5.3% | +20.0% | −26.1% | −22.8% | +43.4% | −37.6% | +64.7% | +58.1% |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 12 of 26 | −15.9% | −15.9% | −6.0% | −16.2% | +30.0% | +48.6% | +24.2% | −15.5% | +7.1% | +22.7% | −10.9% | +8.7% | +46.5% | +3.9% | +3.8% | +30.3% | +7.8% | −19.8% | −3.5% | +1.8% | −10.5% | +16.4% | +19.9% | +17.3% | −6.0% | −13.8% | — | — | — |
| TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. | 19 of 29 | +28.7% | +30.6% | +19.7% | +6.7% | +12.8% | +12.3% | +38.8% | +18.9% | +3.5% | +7.4% | +4.6% | +8.8% | +51.7% | +33.0% | +47.6% | +22.9% | +81.0% | −27.4% | +1.8% | +24.0% | −6.8% | +15.0% | +13.8% | −1.6% | +44.3% | +37.1% | −29.5% | +70.3% | +44.9% |
| ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc. | 2 of 5 | −10.0% | −12.5% | +13.4% | −6.8% | +75.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 6 of 12 | +1.3% | +46.6% | −4.1% | −30.4% | +11.5% | +14.7% | +40.2% | +32.2% | +45.2% | +97.5% | −9.2% | +47.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 13 of 29 | −1.8% | −7.6% | −3.3% | +6.8% | +20.5% | +11.7% | +27.4% | −4.8% | +17.8% | +7.8% | +8.8% | +17.3% | +24.6% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +14.6% | −26.0% | +23.8% | +7.9% | +15.3% | +13.8% | +12.1% | −12.2% | −0.6% | +42.6% | −12.4% | +14.3% | +25.7% |
Risk and diversification
How WMT has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were WMT's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents WMT's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of WMT's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: WMT fell 42.4% from March 1993 to January 1996, while the S&P 500 rose 44.6%.
- The slowest recovery came after WMT fell 37.7% from December 1999 to October 2000; it did not regain that peak until November 2011, 11 years later.
Green means WMT fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | WMT fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −50.6% | — | Aug 1987 | Dec 1987 | 4 months | Jul 1989 | 19 months |
| No named crash | −42.4% | +44.6% | Mar 1993 | Jan 1996 | 2.8 years | Jun 1997 | 17 months |
| Dot-com bust | −37.7% | −4.0% | Dec 1999 | Oct 2000 | 10 months | Nov 2011 | 11.1 years |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −36.4% | −0.2% | Jan 2015 | Nov 2015 | 10 months | Oct 2017 | 23 months |
| No named crash | −31.1% | — | Jul 1990 | Oct 1990 | 3 months | Feb 1991 | 4 months |
How did WMT do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far WMT, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- WMT fell less than the S&P 500 in seven of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when WMT fell 26.2% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, KO held up best, falling less than WMT in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than WMT.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT This pageWalmart Inc. | — | −0.8% | −25.7% | −13.1% | −18.3% | −4.9% | −22.3% | −10.5% | −1.5% | −26.2% | −31.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 1 of 10 | −3.1% | −31.4% | −13.7% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −15.2% | −13.5% | −1.2% | −48.0% | −50.1% |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −3.4% | −39.6% | −22.7% | −33.2% | −7.1% | −30.6% | −20.7% | −2.9% | −65.3% | −91.8% |
| PSMT PriceSmart, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −2.6% | −34.1% | −29.7% | −34.1% | −4.4% | −27.9% | −22.1% | −2.6% | −66.5% | −60.0% |
| SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −2.2% | −33.9% | −26.0% | −20.7% | −3.9% | −19.0% | — | — | — | — |
| TGT Target Corporation | 2 of 10 | −3.4% | −43.9% | −21.7% | −30.3% | −3.0% | −15.8% | −10.4% | −1.3% | −60.6% | −42.6% |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 6 of 10 | −1.4% | −16.7% | −37.0% | −8.8% | −7.8% | −8.8% | −8.3% | 0.0% | −40.6% | −31.3% |
| DG Dollar General Corporation | 3 of 8 | −0.7% | −27.6% | −18.4% | −15.9% | −4.4% | −25.2% | −8.4% | −2.6% | — | — |
| BJ BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 4 | −3.3% | −25.4% | −20.3% | −32.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GO Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. | 0 of 3 | −1.8% | −28.7% | −13.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −4.9% | −37.5% | −51.4% | −26.0% | −5.1% | −20.5% | −12.4% | −2.6% | −46.5% | −45.8% |
| OLLI Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −6.2% | −27.7% | −40.0% | −36.1% | −3.9% | −23.3% | — | — | — | — |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 6 of 10 | −0.7% | −23.8% | −22.9% | −9.6% | −5.1% | −10.9% | −8.9% | −0.7% | −39.0% | −27.1% |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −0.5% | −18.3% | −29.3% | −12.3% | −7.4% | −22.3% | −7.4% | 0.0% | −38.2% | — |
| DLTR Dollar Tree, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −1.5% | −26.5% | −30.2% | −7.2% | −6.7% | −24.1% | −11.3% | −1.9% | −49.1% | −67.1% |
| KR The Kroger Co. | 2 of 10 | −1.3% | −29.6% | −13.0% | −14.9% | −6.0% | −14.3% | −13.7% | −2.2% | −35.3% | −58.3% |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −1.5% | −29.8% | −18.5% | −23.7% | −8.7% | −16.4% | −16.4% | −1.6% | −47.9% | −26.5% |
| TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −4.7% | −27.7% | −42.5% | −25.6% | −5.3% | −16.1% | −9.7% | −2.1% | −49.9% | −32.6% |
| ACI Albertsons Companies, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −2.4% | −31.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −4.8% | −61.5% | −51.4% | −15.6% | −3.7% | −26.8% | — | — | — | — |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −0.8% | −11.9% | −28.3% | −12.3% | −7.2% | −10.2% | −8.3% | −0.2% | −40.4% | −33.0% |
How closely does WMT move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares WMT with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- None of the 17 popular alternatives with the same record had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than WMT's 2.08.
- Over the past 10 years, WMT captured 74% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 36% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.53. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than WMT's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT This pageWalmart Inc. | 74% | 36% | 2.08 | 0.53 |
| SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 54% | 27% | 1.97 | 0.47 |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 93% | 50% | 1.85 | 0.77 |
| KR The Kroger Co. | 49% | 36% | 1.34 | 0.40 |
| KO The Coca-Cola Company | 57% | 44% | 1.29 | 0.47 |
| TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. | 81% | 65% | 1.25 | 0.78 |
| PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 46% | 41% | 1.13 | 0.41 |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 93% | 89% | 1.05 | 0.93 |
| DG Dollar General Corporation | 46% | 46% | 1.00 | 0.37 |
| AMZN Amazon.com, Inc. | 134% | 139% | 0.96 | 1.31 |
| TGT Target Corporation | 83% | 87% | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| OLLI Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc. | 92% | 100% | 0.92 | 0.83 |
| PSMT PriceSmart, Inc. | 68% | 79% | 0.86 | 0.80 |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 103% | 121% | 0.85 | 1.22 |
| MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 45% | 55% | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 48% | 65% | 0.75 | 0.48 |
| DLTR Dollar Tree, Inc. | 52% | 79% | 0.66 | 0.75 |
| UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 85% | 149% | 0.57 | 1.08 |
What diversifies WMT?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with WMT's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing WMT with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in WMT into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+18.9% for WMT alone, +18.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and HDV have moved largely independently of WMT over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.37 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- CAH made money in four of the seven calendar years in which WMT lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which WMT lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% WMT and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2009 | 2005 | 2002 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT Walmart Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +158% | 0.96 | −0.5% | −3.4% | −26.6% | −2.5% | −10.2% | −11.8% | −22.7% | 20.6% | +18.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.37 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 17.3% | +18.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.24 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +2.0% | — | — | — | 17.3% | +20.9% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.35 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −3.0% | −0.3% | — | — | — | — | 17.6% | +17.9% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.44 | +135% | 0.97 | +21.5% | −15.5% | −35.3% | — | — | — | — | 18.4% | +19.6% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.16 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +60.5% | +10.8% | −47.0% | — | 18.9% | +23.8% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.42 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | −9.5% | +4.1% | — | — | — | — | 17.5% | +18.2% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.20 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +24.0% | +17.8% | — | — | 17.5% | +19.4% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.37 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 18.4% | +20.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2009 | 2005 | 2002 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMT Walmart Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +158% | 0.96 | −0.5% | −3.4% | −26.6% | −2.5% | −10.2% | −11.8% | −22.7% | 20.6% | +18.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.26 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | −4.4% | +18.7% | −8.3% | +108% | 18.6% | +23.3% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.32 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +105% | −25.2% | −65.1% | −2.3% | 23.1% | +36.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.30 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +62.9% | +64.9% | −27.2% | +61.2% | 18.6% | +22.6% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.10 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | 18.3% | +25.6% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.38 | +594% | 1.36 | +24.2% | −37.5% | −36.3% | +51.3% | −1.8% | −33.1% | −15.9% | 20.2% | +25.5% |
Common questions
What was WMT's worst drawdown?
WMT's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 50.6%, from August to December 1987. It took 19 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were WMT's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, WMT's best year was 1998, when it returned 107%. Its worst was 2015, with a return of -26.6%.
Is there a better investment than WMT?
Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WMT with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX and DXJ.
Is WMT more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. WMT's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.6%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, WMT's return lands within 22.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is WMT's Sharpe ratio?
WMT's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.96, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so WMT earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is WMT with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, WMT's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.43 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against WMT instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a WMT holding.
What are the best alternatives to WMT?
None of the 20 popular alternatives we compared outperformed WMT in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about WMT's strength than about its alternatives.
Did WMT outperform the S&P 500?
WMT finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 15 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +24.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did WMT do in stock market crashes?
WMT fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in seven of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when WMT fell 26.2% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies WMT?
These had a low correlation with WMT over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.37), DXJ (correlation 0.24) and HDV (correlation 0.35); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.26), CLS (correlation 0.32) and MCK (correlation 0.30). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than WMT's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of WMT's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to WMT
COSTCostco Wholesale
AMZNAmazon.com
TGTTarget
KOCoca-Cola
ROSTRoss Stores
PGProcter & Gamble
MDLZMondelez International
KRKroger
UPSUnited Parcel Service
TJXTJX Companies
PEPPepsiCo