Relative Intelligence · Specialty Retail

How TJX Companies (TJX) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on TJX alone. It places TJX (The TJX Companies, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where TJX stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: TJX's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowTJX has gone against the market, falling 7.3% over the past 6 months while the S&P 500 rose 9.1%. Its specialty retail peers split over the past 6 months: ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch) rose 66.3%, while LULU (Lululemon Athletica) fell 40.1%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?TJX fell 5.3% over the past 3 months, 4.1 points behind the specialty retail ETF XRT (State Street SPDR S&P Retail ETF), which fell 1.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. That said, TJX rose 12.3% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, TJX rose 3.8% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (71.6% against 89.3%). Even so, TJX finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termTJX turned $10,000 into $46,100 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. TJX's 10-year return of 361% puts it ahead of 79% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the 2022 bear market, TJX held up better than its specialty retail peers, including ROST (Ross Stores), BURL and LULU. On the flip side, TJX fell further than the S&P 500 in four of the last four sell-offs, including the Covid crash (42.5% against 33.7%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationTJX is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.43 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.43 with the total US market, more closely than 58% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, TJX's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.78: 81% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 65% of its losses in falling ones. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- WMT (Walmart), COST (Costco Wholesale) and ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch) were ahead of TJX in most short and long periods.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only three of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TJX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF).
How much would $10,000 in TJX have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in TJX over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of TJX over the same span and TJX's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in TJX at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $958,745 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of TJX, and AAPL finished highest, at $20,534,853.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 34 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of TJX; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- APH$3M+29,926% total · +21.7% a year
- ROST$1M+14,044% total · +18.6% a year
- ASML$984,088+9,741% total · +17.1% a year
- TJX$958,745+9,487% total · +17.0% a year
- URBN$356,937+3,469% total · +13.1% a year
- WMT$272,033+2,620% total · +12.1% a year
- ANF$154,447+1,444% total · +9.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 680 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of TJX; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- ANF$35,792+258% total · +29.0% a year
- MPLX$30,642+206% total · +25.1% a year
- DBJP$26,428+164% total · +21.5% a year
- URBN$25,727+157% total · +20.8% a year
- WMT$23,813+138% total · +18.9% a year
- ROST$22,648+126% total · +17.8% a year
- TJX$21,559+116% total · +16.6% a year
- COST$21,378+114% total · +16.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- M$12,216+22.2% total · +4.1% a year
TJX at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- TJX's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 68.0%, from October 1987 to October 1990. It took 25 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, TJX's best was 2009, when it returned 81.0%, and its worst was 1999, when it lost 29.5%. It lost money in four of those years.
- TJX is 12.4% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $162B
- Industry
- Apparel - Retail
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +3.8%total return
- Past 3 years
- +71.6%+19.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +147%+19.9% a year
- Past 10 years
- +361%+16.5% a year
- Best calendar year
- +81.0%2009
- Worst calendar year
- −29.5%1999
- Losing years
- 4 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 22.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.93return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −68.0%Oct 1987 to Oct 1990
- From its all-time high
- −12.4%below the peak
TJX against the whole market
Where TJX ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does TJX rank among all stocks?
This section ranks TJX on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how TJX stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- On return for the risk taken (the Sharpe ratio), TJX ranks in the top 5% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | TJX | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +3.8% | 1,817 of 3,287 | bottom 46% |
| 3-year return | +71.6% | 1,227 of 3,017 | top 41% |
| 5-year return | +147% | 458 of 2,893 | top 16% |
| 10-year return | +361% | 468 of 2,202 | top 21% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 22.3% | 163 of 2,893 | top 6% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.93 | 149 of 2,893 | top 5% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −42.5% | 214 of 2,187 | top 10% |
What has beaten TJX on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). TJX sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than TJX with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- One stock and two ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than TJX over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half TJX's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 15% less than TJX's 22.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.93 for TJX.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to TJX. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- The whole market
- 2 with more than 1.6× TJX's volatility are in the table only
Is there a better investment than TJX?
Investments that beat TJX over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among TJX's popular alternatives, WMT, COST and ANF were ahead of TJX in most short and long periods.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only three of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TJX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ and DBJP.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat TJX over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks TJX's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than TJX follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than TJX's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× TJX's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than TJX's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with TJX?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.43 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 4 shownThe investments people most often weigh against TJX. 4 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.37 | — | ||
ANFAbercrombie & Fitch Co. · Specialty Retail | Higher return in most periods | +33.7% | 62.9% | 0.77 | −72.4% | +1,117% | 0.21 | — | |
URBNUrban Outfitters, Inc. · Specialty Retail | Higher return in most periods | +23.5% | 47.1% | 0.68 | −73.8% | +160% | 0.30 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 167 of 3,569 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.40 | — | ||
DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.23 | 0.45% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.33 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.25 | 0.48% | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.24 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.34 | — | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.39 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.13 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for TJX
- Annual return
- TJX returned 19.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $24,700. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- TJX's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.3%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TJX's return lands within 22.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- TJX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.93, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so TJX earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- TJX's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 42.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 42.5% fall takes a 74.1% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, TJX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.43 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TJX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TJX holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 3 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than TJX with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with TJX | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.40 | — | |
| 2 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.23 | 0.45% |
| 3 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.25 | 0.48% |
TJX against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against TJX, compared period by period and year by year.
How do TJX's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at TJX, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives earned more than TJX over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 17 of the 20 popular alternatives earned less than TJX over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, TJX returned 19.9% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (22.3% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than TJX with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | +33.7% | 62.9% |
| URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc. | +23.5% | 47.1% |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | +20.8% | 22.6% |
| TJX This pageThe TJX Companies, Inc. | +19.9% | 22.3% |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | +18.1% | 29.5% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | +17.4% | 22.9% |
| BKE The Buckle, Inc. | +13.1% | 34.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| ASO Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. | +8.4% | 46.7% |
| GAP The Gap, Inc. | +4.5% | 55.7% |
| BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | +3.8% | 50.5% |
| M Macy's, Inc. | +1.5% | 52.4% |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | −1.3% | 44.4% |
| AEO American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | −3.9% | 54.4% |
| TGT Target Corporation | −6.5% | 36.1% |
| CTRN Citi Trends, Inc. | −8.4% | 61.7% |
| KSS Kohl's Corporation | −8.8% | 70.0% |
| LE Lands' End, Inc. | −16.0% | 67.4% |
| ZUMZ Zumiez Inc. | −18.9% | 52.1% |
| NKE NIKE, Inc. | −23.5% | 35.8% |
| LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | −24.8% | 43.4% |
| RH Rh | −29.3% | 62.7% |
Has TJX consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares TJX with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than TJX helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Four of the 20 popular alternatives, led by ANF, WMT and URBN, outperformed TJX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- ANF outperformed TJX in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- WMT earned more for the risk it took than TJX (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than TJX over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. (this page) | — | +12.3% | −5.3% | −7.3% | −3.8% | +3.8% | +71.6% | +147% | +361% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | — | $162B | — |
| ANF QualifiedAbercrombie & Fitch Co. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +18.3% | +71.3% | +66.3% | +30.7% | +143% | +166% | +328% | +1,117% | 62.9% | 0.77 | −72.4% | — | $6.9B | — |
| WMT QualifiedWalmart Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +9.7% | +5.3% | −7.5% | +5.2% | +11.0% | +130% | +158% | +508% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | — | $938B | — |
| URBN QualifiedUrban Outfitters, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +17.7% | +16.7% | +14.7% | +15.9% | +30.6% | +162% | +187% | +160% | 47.1% | 0.68 | −73.8% | — | $7.5B | — |
| COST QualifiedCostco Wholesale Corporation | 4/5 short2/3 long | +10.7% | +6.5% | 0.0% | +16.9% | +6.9% | +87.2% | +123% | +685% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | — | $441B | — |
| ROST Apparel - RetailRoss Stores, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +2.6% | +0.8% | +4.3% | +30.6% | +51.9% | +111% | +129% | +312% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | — | $76B | — |
| M Department StoresMacy's, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +5.5% | +1.3% | +19.3% | +5.7% | +34.8% | +131% | +7.7% | +0.7% | 52.4% | 0.29 | −87.8% | — | $6.1B | — |
| CTRN Apparel - RetailCiti Trends, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | −11.8% | −25.7% | −3.5% | +17.5% | +34.8% | +102% | −35.5% | +157% | 61.7% | 0.16 | −87.3% | — | $407M | — |
| BKE Apparel - RetailThe Buckle, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +15.1% | +9.2% | −15.4% | −5.8% | −8.4% | +71.8% | +84.7% | +493% | 34.6% | 0.53 | −53.2% | — | $2.4B | — |
| GAP Apparel - RetailThe Gap, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +11.3% | +19.0% | −12.5% | −4.0% | +10.0% | +117% | +24.6% | +25.2% | 55.7% | 0.36 | −83.1% | — | $8.2B | — |
| BOOT Apparel - RetailBoot Barn Holdings, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −7.2% | −23.1% | −31.4% | −38.2% | −39.1% | +50.9% | +20.8% | +910% | 50.5% | 0.33 | −77.9% | — | $3.5B | — |
| BURL Apparel - RetailBurlington Stores, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +2.8% | −26.5% | −25.6% | −13.2% | −3.1% | +112% | −6.2% | +240% | 44.4% | 0.19 | −68.9% | — | $16B | — |
| KSS Department StoresKohl's Corporation | 5/5 short0/3 long | +24.7% | +24.6% | +51.0% | +4.4% | +38.6% | +23.2% | −36.7% | −20.0% | 70.0% | 0.21 | −89.2% | — | $2.5B | — |
| ASO Specialty RetailAcademy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +23.0% | +25.1% | +3.4% | +15.4% | +19.3% | +33.4% | +49.7% | — | 46.7% | 0.41 | −54.2% | — | $3.7B | — |
| TGT Discount StoresTarget Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | −2.4% | +11.2% | +20.3% | +57.4% | +75.1% | +58.0% | −28.5% | +207% | 36.1% | 0.00 | −64.4% | — | $70B | — |
| AEO Apparel - RetailAmerican Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +16.0% | +2.2% | −9.1% | −30.7% | +18.0% | +11.6% | −17.9% | +33.9% | 54.4% | 0.19 | −75.6% | — | $3.0B | — |
| RH Specialty RetailRh | 0/5 short0/3 long | −5.9% | −34.9% | −16.1% | −38.1% | −33.4% | −48.5% | −82.4% | +302% | 62.7% | -0.24 | −85.0% | — | $2.3B | — |
| LULU Apparel - RetailLululemon Athletica Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −1.3% | −14.3% | −40.1% | −52.6% | −42.0% | −74.8% | −75.9% | +73.0% | 43.4% | -0.44 | −82.0% | — | $12B | — |
| NKE Apparel - Footwear & AccessoriesNIKE, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +4.9% | −11.9% | −16.9% | −38.6% | −42.1% | −60.4% | −73.8% | −15.5% | 35.8% | -0.57 | −79.1% | — | $56B | — |
| LE Apparel - RetailLands' End, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −5.3% | −16.8% | −22.0% | −32.1% | −36.3% | +39.2% | −58.1% | −34.4% | 67.4% | 0.08 | −86.1% | — | $293M | — |
| ZUMZ Apparel - RetailZumiez Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +2.2% | −25.3% | −43.9% | −45.3% | −30.5% | −16.8% | −64.9% | −36.5% | 52.1% | -0.14 | −78.8% | — | $217M | — |
How did TJX do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where TJX ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with TJX and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, TJX finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 7 of 21.
- TJX finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 19 of its 29 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, RH came out ahead of TJX most often, in eight of the 13 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of TJX; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places TJX among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of TJX | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJX This pageThe TJX Companies, Inc. | — | +28.7% | +30.6% | +19.7% | +6.7% | +12.8% | +12.3% | +38.8% | +18.9% | +3.5% | +7.4% | +4.6% | +8.8% | +51.7% | +33.0% | +47.6% | +22.9% | +81.0% | −27.4% | +1.8% | +24.0% | −6.8% | +15.0% | +13.8% | −1.6% | +44.3% | +37.1% | −29.5% | +70.3% | +44.9% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 29 | 7 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 12 of 21 | 3 of 21 | 15 of 21 | 14 of 20 | 10 of 20 | 8 of 20 | 17 of 20 | 8 of 20 | 5 of 20 | 13 of 18 | 3 of 17 | 6 of 16 | 2 of 16 | 10 of 16 | 5 of 16 | 8 of 16 | 7 of 15 | 5 of 15 | 11 of 13 | 9 of 13 | 11 of 13 | 3 of 13 | 3 of 13 | 2 of 13 | 12 of 13 | 6 of 13 | 10 of 13 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 13 of 29 | −15.8% | +69.4% | +285% | −34.2% | +71.1% | +19.5% | −9.8% | +19.3% | +54.1% | −53.7% | −2.3% | −11.1% | −30.0% | −0.1% | −14.2% | +68.5% | +54.7% | −70.6% | +15.9% | +8.0% | +40.3% | +92.8% | +20.7% | −22.9% | +32.7% | −25.1% | −24.5% | +126% | +89.6% |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 10 of 29 | +24.5% | +74.0% | +12.9% | −0.5% | +1.9% | +23.4% | +30.1% | −3.4% | +46.6% | +16.1% | −26.6% | +11.8% | +18.2% | +17.1% | +13.8% | +3.1% | −2.5% | +20.0% | +4.9% | +0.2% | −10.2% | +0.6% | +5.6% | −11.8% | +8.9% | −22.7% | +70.5% | +107% | +74.6% |
| URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +37.1% | +53.8% | +49.6% | −18.8% | +14.7% | −7.8% | −16.4% | −5.3% | +23.1% | +25.2% | −35.2% | −5.3% | −5.7% | +42.8% | −23.0% | +2.4% | +134% | −45.1% | +18.4% | −9.0% | +14.0% | +140% | +214% | −2.3% | +204% | −72.7% | +72.5% | −7.5% | +39.9% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 16 of 29 | −5.4% | +39.6% | +49.0% | −19.1% | +51.8% | +32.7% | +45.7% | +10.6% | +22.4% | +0.3% | +18.9% | +20.5% | +21.9% | +28.4% | +16.7% | +23.7% | +14.3% | −24.0% | +33.2% | +7.9% | +3.2% | +31.1% | +32.5% | −36.8% | +11.1% | −12.5% | +26.4% | +61.8% | +77.7% |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +20.4% | +10.4% | +20.6% | +2.9% | −6.0% | +5.8% | +41.3% | +4.8% | +23.5% | +23.0% | +15.3% | +27.0% | +39.9% | +14.9% | +52.0% | +49.7% | +45.3% | +17.8% | −12.0% | +2.4% | +0.9% | +9.4% | +25.5% | +32.9% | +91.0% | −5.7% | −8.3% | +9.7% | +47.9% |
| M Macy's, Inc. | 9 of 29 | +36.4% | −12.4% | +1.6% | −18.7% | +136% | −31.1% | −38.2% | +23.6% | −25.3% | +6.5% | −45.4% | +25.6% | +39.6% | +23.8% | +28.8% | +52.4% | +64.5% | −58.7% | −31.1% | +16.6% | +16.1% | +23.9% | +65.3% | −29.7% | +16.8% | −30.8% | +16.1% | +1.2% | +26.2% |
| CTRN Citi Trends, Inc. | 8 of 20 | +58.3% | −7.2% | +6.8% | −72.0% | +90.7% | +116% | +15.5% | −22.0% | +42.7% | −10.2% | −15.4% | +48.5% | +23.6% | +56.8% | −64.3% | −11.1% | +87.6% | −4.7% | −61.1% | −7.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BKE The Buckle, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +14.0% | +17.5% | +15.0% | +10.9% | +69.9% | +25.0% | +55.2% | −8.8% | +12.6% | −20.2% | −37.3% | +6.9% | +19.1% | +22.8% | +16.0% | +41.4% | +45.0% | +8.6% | −0.9% | +71.0% | +10.7% | +35.8% | +23.1% | −19.3% | +26.7% | +18.0% | −38.0% | +5.3% | +173% |
| GAP The Gap, Inc. | 11 of 29 | +11.7% | +16.1% | +96.6% | −32.6% | −11.1% | +15.7% | −28.1% | −22.0% | +56.0% | −4.6% | −39.9% | +10.0% | +27.5% | +70.1% | −13.8% | +7.7% | +59.8% | −35.9% | +10.6% | +12.4% | −15.6% | −8.6% | +50.3% | +12.1% | −45.0% | −44.4% | +23.2% | +138% | +77.5% |
| BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | 5 of 11 | +16.2% | +97.8% | +22.8% | −49.2% | +184% | −2.6% | +161% | +2.5% | +32.7% | +1.9% | −32.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 7 of 12 | +1.3% | +46.6% | −4.1% | −30.4% | +11.5% | +14.7% | +40.2% | +32.2% | +45.2% | +97.5% | −9.2% | +47.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KSS Kohl's Corporation | 14 of 29 | +51.5% | −45.8% | +23.7% | −46.0% | +23.6% | −17.2% | −19.2% | +26.7% | +12.6% | +8.3% | −19.5% | +10.6% | +35.7% | −10.5% | −7.4% | +0.8% | +49.0% | −21.0% | −33.1% | +40.8% | −1.2% | +9.4% | −19.7% | −20.5% | +15.5% | +69.0% | +17.5% | +80.4% | +73.4% |
| ASO Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. | 3 of 5 | −12.2% | −12.2% | +26.4% | +20.5% | +112% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TGT Target Corporation | 10 of 29 | −24.5% | −2.3% | −1.4% | −34.2% | +32.9% | +40.5% | +100% | +4.7% | −5.8% | +2.7% | −1.6% | +23.8% | +9.5% | +18.2% | −13.0% | +26.3% | +42.4% | −30.0% | −11.6% | +4.7% | +6.6% | +36.1% | +29.0% | −26.5% | +28.0% | −11.5% | +36.2% | +62.2% | +74.2% |
| AEO American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +64.6% | −19.3% | +54.9% | −43.5% | +29.8% | +38.8% | −22.1% | +5.5% | +28.5% | +0.9% | +15.1% | +0.3% | −28.1% | +59.5% | +8.4% | −8.0% | +86.7% | −53.4% | −32.3% | +106% | −1.2% | +188% | +19.3% | −47.5% | −7.1% | −6.0% | +35.0% | +331% | +342% |
| RH Rh | 8 of 13 | −54.5% | +35.0% | +9.1% | −50.1% | +19.8% | +110% | +78.2% | +39.0% | +181% | −61.4% | −17.3% | +42.7% | +99.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 9 of 18 | −45.7% | −25.2% | +59.6% | −18.2% | +12.5% | +50.2% | +90.5% | +54.7% | +20.9% | +23.9% | −5.9% | −5.5% | −22.6% | +63.4% | +36.4% | +127% | +279% | −83.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NKE NIKE, Inc. | 14 of 29 | −13.8% | −29.1% | −6.0% | −29.0% | +18.7% | +41.0% | +38.1% | +19.9% | +24.7% | −17.7% | +31.4% | +23.8% | +54.4% | +8.7% | +14.5% | +31.2% | +32.0% | −19.3% | +31.4% | +15.0% | −3.7% | +33.4% | +54.9% | −20.6% | +1.4% | +13.7% | +22.9% | +4.3% | −34.5% |
| LE Lands' End, Inc. | 4 of 11 | +10.5% | +37.5% | +26.0% | −61.3% | −9.0% | +28.4% | +18.2% | −27.3% | +29.0% | −35.4% | −56.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ZUMZ Zumiez Inc. | 7 of 20 | +35.9% | −5.8% | −6.4% | −54.7% | +30.5% | +6.5% | +80.2% | −8.0% | −4.7% | +44.5% | −60.9% | +48.6% | +34.0% | −30.1% | +3.3% | +111% | +70.7% | −69.4% | −17.5% | +36.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How TJX has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were TJX's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents TJX's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of TJX's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: TJX fell 64.5% from June 1993 to April 1995, while the S&P 500 rose 19.3%.
- The slowest recovery came after TJX fell 68.0% from October 1987 to October 1990; it did not regain that peak until November 1992, two years later.
Green means TJX fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | TJX fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No named crash | −68.0% | — | Oct 1987 | Oct 1990 | 3 years | Nov 1992 | 2.1 years |
| No named crash | −64.5% | +19.3% | Jun 1993 | Apr 1995 | 22 months | May 1996 | 13 months |
| No named crash | −61.0% | −1.4% | Apr 1999 | Feb 2000 | 10 months | Aug 2001 | 18 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −49.9% | −37.3% | Aug 2008 | Nov 2008 | 3 months | Jul 2009 | 8 months |
| No named crash | −44.6% | −16.4% | Jul 1998 | Oct 1998 | 3 months | Dec 1998 | 2 months |
How did TJX do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far TJX, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, WMT held up best, falling less than TJX in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- TJX fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when TJX fell 42.5% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than TJX.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJX This pageThe TJX Companies, Inc. | — | −4.7% | −27.7% | −42.5% | −25.6% | −5.3% | −16.1% | −9.7% | −2.1% | −49.9% | −32.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0 of 10 | −7.4% | −64.9% | −52.1% | −25.4% | −6.6% | −19.4% | −27.0% | −3.3% | −83.1% | −65.4% |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 7 of 10 | −0.8% | −25.7% | −13.1% | −18.3% | −4.9% | −22.3% | −10.5% | −1.5% | −26.2% | −31.8% |
| URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −4.9% | −40.0% | −53.2% | −23.8% | −4.7% | −37.3% | −34.8% | −2.9% | −65.5% | −53.6% |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 6 of 10 | −3.1% | −31.4% | −13.7% | −20.8% | −6.5% | −15.2% | −13.5% | −1.2% | −48.0% | −50.1% |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −4.9% | −37.5% | −51.4% | −26.0% | −5.1% | −20.5% | −12.4% | −2.6% | −46.5% | −45.8% |
| M Macy's, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −11.4% | −44.6% | −69.9% | −24.6% | −5.7% | −48.1% | −24.4% | −2.2% | −83.2% | −46.4% |
| CTRN Citi Trends, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −10.1% | −82.4% | −61.8% | −38.2% | −4.3% | −42.8% | −30.0% | −5.7% | −71.6% | — |
| BKE The Buckle, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −4.6% | −34.5% | −44.2% | −22.1% | −1.2% | −34.8% | −25.5% | −3.4% | −62.4% | −36.7% |
| GAP The Gap, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −13.3% | −55.4% | −64.0% | −14.0% | −4.8% | −35.6% | −21.0% | −2.8% | −55.7% | −82.5% |
| BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −7.6% | −54.8% | −68.9% | −47.4% | −7.6% | −79.1% | — | — | — | — |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −4.8% | −61.5% | −51.4% | −15.6% | −3.7% | −26.8% | — | — | — | — |
| KSS Kohl's Corporation | 0 of 10 | −15.6% | −59.0% | −69.7% | −26.8% | −4.9% | −34.4% | −24.9% | −1.7% | −59.1% | −39.7% |
| ASO Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. | 1 of 2 | −4.2% | −35.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TGT Target Corporation | 4 of 10 | −3.4% | −43.9% | −21.7% | −30.3% | −3.0% | −15.8% | −10.4% | −1.3% | −60.6% | −42.6% |
| AEO American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −9.1% | −60.8% | −47.6% | −30.1% | −2.6% | −27.4% | −27.4% | −1.9% | −70.7% | −75.0% |
| RH Rh | 1 of 6 | −9.3% | −60.0% | −67.8% | −23.8% | −7.1% | −55.3% | — | — | — | — |
| LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0 of 9 | −4.2% | −36.4% | −47.3% | −30.3% | −5.3% | −33.9% | −29.4% | −3.6% | −92.2% | — |
| NKE NIKE, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −2.5% | −49.7% | −38.6% | −20.8% | −7.0% | −17.9% | −14.3% | −2.4% | −44.1% | −39.1% |
| LE Lands' End, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −10.3% | −62.6% | −60.8% | −41.5% | −1.4% | −28.0% | — | — | — | — |
| ZUMZ Zumiez Inc. | 0 of 9 | −11.3% | −57.0% | −47.3% | −36.4% | −5.8% | −42.9% | −41.1% | −2.3% | −88.1% | — |
How closely does TJX move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares TJX with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, TJX captured 81% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 65% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.78. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only WMT and COST had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than TJX's 1.25, out of 19 popular alternatives with the same record.
- WMT took just 36% of the S&P 500's losses, against 65% for TJX, while still keeping 74% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than TJX's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJX This pageThe TJX Companies, Inc. | 81% | 65% | 1.25 | 0.78 |
| WMT Walmart Inc. | 74% | 36% | 2.08 | 0.53 |
| COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 93% | 50% | 1.85 | 0.77 |
| ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 138% | 112% | 1.23 | 1.36 |
| BKE The Buckle, Inc. | 95% | 80% | 1.19 | 1.12 |
| ROST Ross Stores, Inc. | 93% | 89% | 1.05 | 0.93 |
| TGT Target Corporation | 83% | 87% | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| BOOT Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. | 189% | 201% | 0.94 | 2.31 |
| BURL Burlington Stores, Inc. | 103% | 121% | 0.85 | 1.22 |
| CTRN Citi Trends, Inc. | 120% | 165% | 0.73 | 1.83 |
| URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc. | 97% | 136% | 0.71 | 1.40 |
| RH Rh | 197% | 283% | 0.69 | 2.21 |
| LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 83% | 132% | 0.63 | 1.12 |
| GAP The Gap, Inc. | 127% | 217% | 0.58 | 1.86 |
| AEO American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | 94% | 164% | 0.57 | 1.37 |
| M Macy's, Inc. | 93% | 183% | 0.51 | 1.75 |
| LE Lands' End, Inc. | 163% | 323% | 0.50 | 2.48 |
| KSS Kohl's Corporation | 109% | 234% | 0.47 | 1.76 |
| NKE NIKE, Inc. | 71% | 155% | 0.46 | 1.01 |
| ZUMZ Zumiez Inc. | 70% | 155% | 0.45 | 1.37 |
What diversifies TJX?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with TJX's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing TJX with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in TJX into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+16.6% for TJX alone, +17.6% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of TJX over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, CLS and FIX have moved largely independently of TJX over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.34 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which TJX lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% TJX and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +147% | 0.93 | −27.4% | −6.8% | −1.6% | −29.5% | 20.7% | +16.6% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.49 | +119% | 1.48 | — | — | — | — | 17.5% | +17.0% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.25 | +225% | 1.34 | −20.8% | — | — | — | 17.3% | +19.0% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.42 | +101% | 1.04 | — | — | — | — | 17.9% | +16.7% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.20 | +323% | 0.97 | −44.7% | +10.8% | −47.0% | — | 19.2% | +21.7% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.44 | +85.0% | 0.96 | — | — | — | — | 17.6% | +16.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.04 | +126% | 0.96 | +4.9% | +17.8% | — | — | 17.0% | +17.6% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.33 | +136% | 0.93 | — | — | — | — | 18.3% | +18.1% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.25 | +177% | 0.93 | −39.0% | +40.1% | −14.8% | +18.1% | 18.5% | +18.6% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJX The TJX Companies, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +147% | 0.93 | −27.4% | −6.8% | −1.6% | −29.5% | 20.7% | +16.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.24 | +479% | 1.55 | −39.6% | +18.7% | −8.3% | −36.8% | 18.5% | +21.4% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.20 | +3,143% | 1.47 | −20.5% | −25.2% | −65.1% | +350% | 22.1% | +34.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.34 | +1,636% | 1.46 | −15.2% | +20.1% | −9.4% | −58.7% | 21.3% | +30.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.36 | +413% | 1.44 | −40.4% | +64.9% | −27.2% | −71.3% | 18.9% | +20.6% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.21 | +690% | 1.41 | — | — | — | — | 19.0% | +23.5% |
Common questions
What was TJX's worst drawdown?
TJX's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 68.0%, from October 1987 to October 1990. It took 25 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were TJX's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, TJX's best year was 2009, when it returned 81.0%. Its worst was 1999, with a return of -29.5%.
Is there a better investment than TJX?
Among TJX's popular alternatives, WMT, COST and ANF were ahead of TJX in most short and long periods. Few investments have done better on both counts: only three of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than TJX with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ and DBJP.
Is TJX more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. TJX's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.3%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, TJX's return lands within 22.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is TJX's Sharpe ratio?
TJX's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.93, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so TJX earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is TJX with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, TJX's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.43 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against TJX instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a TJX holding.
What are the best alternatives to TJX?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, four outperformed TJX in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: ANF, WMT and URBN.
Did TJX outperform the S&P 500?
TJX finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 19 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +28.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did TJX do in stock market crashes?
TJX fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when TJX fell 42.5% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies TJX?
These had a low correlation with TJX over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.49), DXJ (correlation 0.25) and EMLP (correlation 0.42); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.24), CLS (correlation 0.20) and FIX (correlation 0.34). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than TJX's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of TJX's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.