Relative Intelligence · Environmental Services

How Waste Management (WM) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on WM alone. It places WM (Waste Management, Inc.) against 11 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where WM stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: WM's full trading record, from June 1988 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowIts environmental services peers split over the past 3 months: RSG (Republic Services) rose 6.0%, while PESI (Perma-Fix Environmental Services) fell 24.8%. Over the past 3 months, WM fell 2.6% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?WM fell 2.6% over the past 3 months, 3.5 points ahead of the industrials sector ETF XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF), which fell 6.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. WM rose 11.9% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsWM has trailed the market, rising 9.4% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (54.9% against 89.3%). That said, WM lagged its environmental services peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termWM turned $10,000 into $44,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, over 5 years WM trailed the index: 56.2% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, WM has typically lost about 76% as much as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, WM held up better than WCN (Waste Connections), CLH and GFL; only RSG (Republic Services) fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationWM moves far less with the S&P 500 than it used to, with a correlation of 0.35 over the past 5 years against 0.72 in the 5 years before. Against the S&P 500, WM has a correlation of 0.35 over 5 years, less closely than 60% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, industrial machinery) and EMR (Emerson Electric, industrial machinery) were ahead of WM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (26.2% and 27.7% volatility against 19.2%).
- Whole market
- 198 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in WM have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in WM over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of WM over the same span and WM's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in WM at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $93,069 by September 2026, less than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the seven other investments on the chart ended ahead of WM, and CLH finished highest, at $3,202,231.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 561 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of WM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 2 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CLH$3M+31,922% total · +22.0% a year
- LECO$447,688+4,377% total · +14.0% a year
- WAB$275,358+2,654% total · +12.1% a year
- TTEK$181,043+1,710% total · +10.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- EMR$115,655+1,057% total · +8.8% a year
- WM$93,069+831% total · +8.0% a year
- DAR$63,368+534% total · +6.6% a year
- PESI$15,648+56.5% total · +1.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,603 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of WM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- WAB$34,242+242% total · +27.9% a year
- CLH$29,868+199% total · +24.5% a year
- PESI$23,533+135% total · +18.7% a year
- LECO$22,096+121% total · +17.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- RSG$18,545+85.5% total · +13.1% a year
- EMR$18,174+81.7% total · +12.7% a year
- WM$14,773+47.7% total · +8.1% a year
- TTEK$11,397+14.0% total · +2.6% a year
- CWST$10,581+5.8% total · +1.1% a year
WM at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- WM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1988 was 77.8%, from May 1999 to March 2000. It took about 13 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, WM's best was 2000, when it returned 61.5%, and its worst was 1999, when it lost 63.1%. It lost money in five of those years.
- WM is 4.8% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $93B
- Industry
- Waste Management
- Price history from
- June 1988
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +9.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +54.9%+15.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +56.2%+9.3% a year
- Past 10 years
- +344%+16.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +61.5%2000
- Worst calendar year
- −63.1%1999
- Losing years
- 5 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 19.2%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.56return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −77.8%May 1999 to Mar 2000
- From its all-time high
- −4.8%below the peak
WM against the whole market
Where WM ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does WM rank among all stocks?
This section ranks WM on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how WM stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- WM's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 1% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | WM | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +9.4% | 1,606 of 3,287 | top 49% |
| 3-year return | +54.9% | 1,469 of 3,017 | top 49% |
| 5-year return | +56.2% | 1,035 of 2,893 | top 36% |
| 10-year return | +344% | 495 of 2,202 | top 22% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 19.2% | 73 of 2,893 | top 3% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.56 | 764 of 2,893 | top 26% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −30.1% | 19 of 2,187 | top 1% |
What has beaten WM on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). WM sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than WM with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Five stocks and 193 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than WM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 5% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half WM's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 42% less than WM's 19.2%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.56 for WM.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to WM; faint dots are 67 more of the 198 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than WM?
Investments that beat WM over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among WM's popular alternatives, RSG earned more than WM over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 13.9% a year at 18.5% volatility, against 9.3% a year at 19.2%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WAB (industrial machinery) and EMR (industrial machinery) were ahead of WM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (26.2% and 27.7% volatility against 19.2%).
- Across the whole market, 198 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than WM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VTI, VOO and BRK-B.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat WM over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks WM's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than WM follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than WM's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× WM's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than WM's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with WM?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.35 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against WM. 2 of 11 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.82 | — | ||
CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Higher return in most periods | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.53 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 4 shownEverything else in Environmental Services and the categories next to it (Infrastructure, Water Utilities, Industrial Machinery, Engineering & Construction), plus WM's specific themes. 4 of 67 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.38 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +12.7% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | +309% | 0.26 | — | ||
LECOLincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Higher return in most periods | +14.1% | 27.5% | 0.62 | −38.9% | +389% | 0.48 | — | |
WTSWatts Water Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Machinery | Higher return in most periods | +15.3% | 28.4% | 0.65 | −44.1% | +539% | 0.36 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 503 of 3,557 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.37 | 0.21% | ||
FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.23 | 0.85% | |
AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.40 | 0.15% | |
JAVAJPMorgan Active Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.5% | 14.5% | 0.82 | −16.5% | — | — | 0.44% | |
TSPAT. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF · Broad Market | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.1% | 17.1% | 0.81 | −24.7% | — | 0.35 | 0.34% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.46 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.15 | — | ||
TDVGT. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF · Dividend & Income | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +9.6% | 13.8% | 0.73 | −19.2% | — | 0.54 | 0.50% | |
What these numbers mean for WM
- Annual return
- WM returned 9.3% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $15,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- WM's volatility over the past 5 years was 19.2%, 1.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, WM's return lands within 19.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- WM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.56, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so WM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- WM's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 30.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 30.1% fall takes a 43.0% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, WM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.35 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against WM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a WM holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 198 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than WM with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 74 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with WM | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | — | 0.37 | 0.21% | |
| 2 | FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | — | 0.23 | 0.85% |
| 3 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.40 | 0.15% |
| 4 | JAVAJPMorgan Active Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.5% | 14.5% | 0.82 | −16.5% | — | — | 0.44% |
| 5 | TSPAT. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.1% | 17.1% | 0.81 | −24.7% | — | 0.35 | 0.34% |
| 6 | QDPLPacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.8% | 15.0% | 0.82 | −22.6% | — | 0.33 | 0.60% |
| 7 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.46 | — | |
| 8 | INFLHorizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.8% | 17.8% | 0.72 | −21.3% | — | 0.44 | 0.85% |
| 9 | FTQIFirst Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.5% | 14.8% | 0.82 | −19.4% | +121% | 0.22 | 0.75% |
| 10 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.37 | — | |
| 11 | SIXAETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.8% | 12.7% | 1.01 | −18.4% | — | 0.47 | 0.31% |
| 12 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.39 | 0.40% |
| 13 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.37 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +10.4% | 14.1% | 0.78 | −31.7% | +258% | 0.48 | 0.04% | |
| 15 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.35 | 0.26% | |
| 16 | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.3% | 0.71 | −34.1% | +293% | 0.45 | 0.15% | |
| 17 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +157% | 0.27 | 0.31% |
| 18 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.26 | 0.25% |
| 19 | ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +10.6% | 16.2% | 0.70 | −33.5% | +227% | 0.35 | 0.32% |
| 20 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.42 | 0.08% |
| 21 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.24 | 0.36% |
| 22 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.43 | 0.20% |
| 23 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.45 | 0.39% |
| 24 | PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | — | 0.34 | 0.79% |
| 25 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +253% | 0.34 | 0.15% |
| 26 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.42 | 0.35% |
| 27 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.36 | 0.43% |
| 28 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.44 | 0.12% |
| 29 | BBCAJPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +11.4% | 16.7% | 0.73 | −42.8% | — | 0.40 | 0.19% |
| 30 | DIVOAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Equity Income | Whole market | +11.1% | 11.9% | 0.95 | −30.0% | — | 0.46 | 0.56% |
| 31 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.52 | 0.95% |
| 32 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.28 | 0.60% |
| 33 | DSIiShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF · US ESG Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 18.1% | 0.72 | −34.1% | +322% | 0.32 | 0.25% |
| 34 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +221% | 0.41 | 0.20% |
| 35 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +139% | -0.01 | 0.98% |
| 36 | EWUiShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF · International | Whole market | +11.4% | 16.4% | 0.74 | −43.3% | +130% | 0.31 | 0.50% |
| 37 | WTVWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.0% | 0.83 | −42.2% | +303% | 0.37 | 0.12% |
| 38 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.37 | 0.09% |
| 39 | EQWLInvesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.0% | 0.81 | −34.3% | +291% | 0.38 | 0.30% |
| 40 | HDEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +12.8% | 14.2% | 0.92 | −36.4% | +134% | 0.35 | 0.09% |
| 41 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.37 | 0.05% |
| 42 | HFXINYLI FTSE International Equity Currency Neutral ETF · International | Whole market | +11.4% | 15.3% | 0.79 | −32.4% | +180% | 0.34 | 0.19% |
| 43 | DSTLDistillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.3% | 16.1% | 0.75 | −33.1% | — | 0.44 | 0.39% |
| 44 | DDWMWisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund · International | Whole market | +12.3% | 13.4% | 0.94 | −35.0% | +149% | 0.38 | 0.40% |
| 45 | DHSWisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Fund · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.0% | 13.9% | 0.89 | −37.4% | +156% | 0.35 | 0.38% |
| 46 | RODMHartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF · International | Whole market | +10.6% | 13.5% | 0.82 | −36.0% | +141% | 0.37 | 0.29% |
| 47 | FGDFirst Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund · International | Whole market | +11.6% | 14.8% | 0.82 | −44.8% | +155% | 0.25 | 0.55% |
| 48 | RAAXVanEck Real Assets ETF · Commodities | Whole market | +11.7% | 15.6% | 0.79 | −33.9% | — | 0.38 | 0.55% |
| 49 | FVALFidelity Value Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.4% | 16.4% | 0.80 | −37.3% | +291% | 0.30 | 0.15% |
| 50 | RDIVInvesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.2% | 17.3% | 0.75 | −50.0% | +184% | 0.30 | 0.39% |
| 51 | TPYPTortoise North American Pipeline ETF · Energy | Whole market | +16.9% | 17.3% | 0.99 | −51.9% | +184% | 0.48 | 0.40% |
| 52 | AUSFGlobal X - Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF · International | Whole market | +13.2% | 13.6% | 0.99 | −44.2% | — | 0.51 | 0.27% |
| 53 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.6% | 0.85 | −41.3% | — | 0.37 | 0.18% |
| 54 | FTAFirst Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund · Broad Market | Whole market | +10.4% | 16.2% | 0.70 | −45.0% | +190% | 0.39 | 0.58% |
| 55 | PPHVanEck Pharmaceutical ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.6% | 15.8% | 0.78 | −29.7% | +153% | 0.37 | 0.36% |
| 56 | FTXHFirst Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.9% | 16.9% | 0.75 | −32.1% | +153% | 0.29 | 0.60% |
| 57 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.26 | 0.50% |
| 58 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.50 | 0.19% |
| 59 | JVALJPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.0% | 17.2% | 0.75 | −40.4% | — | 0.30 | 0.12% |
| 60 | ROUSHartford Multifactor US Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.3% | 14.4% | 0.88 | −35.5% | +238% | 0.45 | 0.19% |
| 61 | DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF · International | Whole market | +13.8% | 15.1% | 0.94 | −34.4% | +261% | 0.32 | 0.50% |
| 62 | FYLDCambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.0% | 0.85 | −44.6% | +203% | 0.27 | 0.59% |
| 63 | IDOGALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 15.6% | 0.93 | −37.3% | +180% | 0.22 | 0.50% |
| 64 | QDEFNorthern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.7% | 0.94 | −35.7% | +228% | 0.44 | 0.40% |
| 65 | VUSEVident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.3% | 17.2% | 0.71 | −43.9% | +213% | 0.34 | 0.50% |
| 66 | PJPInvesco Pharmaceuticals ETF · Healthcare | Whole market | +11.2% | 16.6% | 0.72 | −34.0% | +135% | 0.29 | 0.58% |
| 67 | IPKWInvesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF · International | Whole market | +11.0% | 17.0% | 0.71 | −47.3% | +197% | 0.26 | 0.55% |
| 68 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.38 | — | |
| 69 | XLIState Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF · US Industrials | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.6% | 0.71 | −42.3% | +246% | 0.50 | 0.08% |
| 70 | COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +11.4% | 17.7% | 0.70 | −38.7% | — | 0.30 | 0.49% |
| 71 | MLPAGlobal X - MLP ETF · Energy | Whole market | +15.2% | 17.2% | 0.91 | −74.3% | +80.0% | 0.32 | 0.77% |
| 72 | DBAInvesco DB Agriculture Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +10.7% | 13.8% | 0.81 | −35.3% | +62.2% | 0.19 | 0.90% |
| 73 | EXIiShares Global Industrials ETF · Industrials | Whole market | +10.6% | 17.3% | 0.67 | −39.6% | +203% | 0.47 | 0.38% |
| 74 | FXUFirst Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund · Utilities | Whole market | +11.2% | 16.6% | 0.72 | −34.8% | +138% | 0.55 | 0.61% |
WM against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against WM, compared period by period and year by year.
How do WM's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at WM, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only RSG was both more rewarding and calmer than WM over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Eight of the 11 popular alternatives earned less than WM over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, WM returned 9.3% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (19.2% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than WM with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | +23.1% | 28.6% |
| RSG Republic Services, Inc. | +13.9% | 18.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| PESI Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | +11.9% | 61.5% |
| WM This pageWaste Management, Inc. | +9.3% | 19.2% |
| WCN Waste Connections, Inc. | +6.1% | 20.0% |
| CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | +2.8% | 28.1% |
| TTEK Tetra Tech, Inc. | +2.2% | 32.3% |
| GFL GFL Environmental Inc. | +2.1% | 30.2% |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | −2.5% | 26.5% |
| AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | −2.8% | 23.1% |
| DAR Darling Ingredients Inc. | −5.2% | 40.3% |
| CLW Clearwater Paper Corporation | −14.6% | 47.5% |
Has WM consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares WM with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than WM helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Two of the 11 popular alternatives, CLH and RSG, outperformed WM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than WM over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| WM Waste Management, Inc. (this page) | — | +11.9% | −2.6% | +4.3% | +7.5% | +9.4% | +54.9% | +56.2% | +344% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | — | $93B | — |
| CLH QualifiedClean Harbors, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +1.6% | +2.0% | +4.2% | +29.9% | +30.0% | +102% | +183% | +588% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | — | $17B | — |
| RSG QualifiedRepublic Services, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +9.3% | +6.0% | +12.5% | +11.8% | +7.1% | +66.1% | +91.5% | +446% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | — | $71B | — |
| CWST Waste ManagementCasella Waste Systems, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +6.9% | −0.5% | +17.0% | −5.7% | +8.3% | +22.6% | +14.7% | +740% | 28.1% | 0.24 | −37.7% | — | $5.8B | — |
| TTEK Engineering & ConstructionTetra Tech, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −2.8% | +12.0% | +10.7% | +4.6% | +5.6% | +13.7% | +11.6% | +388% | 32.3% | 0.23 | −47.5% | — | $9.0B | — |
| PESI Waste ManagementPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −28.6% | −24.8% | −3.7% | +1.1% | −8.4% | +36.0% | +75.9% | +156% | 61.5% | 0.49 | −65.6% | — | $263M | — |
| DAR Packaged FoodsDarling Ingredients Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −6.4% | −6.7% | +0.2% | +57.3% | +86.2% | +42.0% | −23.4% | +342% | 40.3% | 0.07 | −68.3% | — | $9.3B | — |
| WCN Waste ManagementWaste Connections, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +9.0% | −0.6% | +6.5% | −2.0% | −1.8% | +27.0% | +34.2% | +270% | 20.0% | 0.40 | −31.6% | — | $43B | — |
| CLW Paper, Lumber & Forest ProductsClearwater Paper Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −10.9% | +15.6% | +24.2% | +7.1% | −3.5% | −47.8% | −54.5% | −70.7% | 47.5% | -0.10 | −81.6% | — | $306M | — |
| GFL Waste ManagementGFL Environmental Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +4.0% | +13.7% | +12.9% | +3.9% | −2.2% | +48.6% | +11.1% | — | 30.2% | 0.22 | −42.6% | — | $16B | — |
| AWK Regulated WaterAmerican Water Works Company, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +1.4% | +2.3% | +3.3% | +6.4% | −4.1% | +26.2% | −13.1% | +131% | 23.1% | -0.01 | −37.1% | — | $27B | — |
| XYL Industrial - MachineryXylem Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.1% | −12.6% | −12.1% | −22.5% | −27.4% | +18.7% | −11.7% | +143% | 26.5% | 0.04 | −46.7% | — | $25B | — |
How did WM do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where WM ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with WM and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- WM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, WCN came out ahead of WM most often, in 15 of the 24 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, WM finished in the top quarter in four of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in two. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 12.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of WM; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places WM among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of WM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM This pageWaste Management, Inc. | — | +10.5% | +14.3% | +16.2% | −4.5% | +43.8% | +5.5% | +30.4% | +5.3% | +24.5% | +36.4% | +7.1% | +18.2% | +37.8% | +7.6% | −7.7% | +13.3% | +6.3% | +4.8% | −8.7% | +24.3% | +4.3% | +3.7% | +29.2% | −28.1% | +15.0% | +61.5% | −63.1% | +18.8% | +23.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 29 | 3 of 12 | 8 of 12 | 5 of 12 | 4 of 12 | 3 of 12 | 9 of 11 | 7 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 5 of 11 | 5 of 11 | 1 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 7 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 4 of 8 | 8 of 8 | 5 of 8 | 4 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 4 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 6 of 7 | 2 of 7 | 7 of 7 | 3 of 6 | 3 of 5 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 15 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +1.9% | +31.9% | +52.9% | +14.4% | +31.1% | −11.3% | +73.8% | −8.9% | −2.6% | +33.6% | −13.3% | −19.9% | +9.0% | −13.7% | +51.6% | +41.0% | −6.0% | +22.7% | +6.8% | +68.0% | +90.9% | +69.3% | −42.7% | +360% | +89.8% | +42.5% | −16.7% | −4.0% | −30.9% |
| RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 16 of 27 | +6.5% | +23.0% | +29.6% | −6.2% | +47.0% | +9.5% | +26.6% | +8.8% | +21.0% | +32.9% | +12.4% | +24.8% | +16.6% | +10.0% | −5.1% | +8.3% | +18.0% | −18.9% | +17.6% | +9.9% | +13.6% | +32.4% | +22.8% | +5.1% | +16.3% | +20.6% | −22.7% | — | — |
| CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 14 of 28 | −7.4% | +23.8% | +7.8% | −7.1% | +37.9% | +34.6% | +61.6% | +23.8% | +85.5% | +108% | +48.0% | −30.3% | +32.4% | −31.6% | −9.7% | +76.4% | −1.5% | −68.7% | +6.6% | −4.4% | −12.6% | +6.9% | +54.0% | −40.0% | +70.4% | −54.0% | −49.1% | +40.8% | — |
| TTEK Tetra Tech, Inc. | 15 of 29 | −15.2% | +20.0% | +15.7% | −14.0% | +47.4% | +35.4% | +67.8% | +8.3% | +12.5% | +67.6% | −1.4% | −3.9% | +5.8% | +22.4% | −13.9% | −7.7% | +12.6% | +12.3% | +18.5% | +15.8% | −6.6% | −32.6% | +104% | −38.8% | −22.0% | +108% | −29.0% | +68.8% | +26.5% |
| PESI Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +13.7% | +40.8% | +123% | −44.2% | +6.0% | −34.4% | +287% | −35.6% | −6.4% | +4.8% | −14.5% | +39.9% | −8.5% | −56.1% | −4.9% | −28.2% | +81.6% | −49.4% | +6.5% | +38.9% | −7.7% | −41.8% | +24.4% | −3.9% | +82.8% | +19.7% | −20.8% | −36.0% | +50.1% |
| DAR Darling Ingredients Inc. | 15 of 29 | +6.9% | −32.4% | −20.4% | −9.7% | +20.1% | +105% | +45.9% | +6.1% | +40.4% | +22.7% | −42.1% | −13.0% | +30.2% | +20.7% | +0.1% | +58.5% | +52.6% | −52.5% | +110% | +38.8% | −8.9% | +58.0% | +54.2% | +156% | +86.7% | −82.4% | −30.4% | −64.0% | −13.5% |
| WCN Waste Connections, Inc. | 15 of 24 | +2.9% | +15.7% | +13.5% | −2.0% | +33.8% | +13.9% | +23.2% | +5.5% | +36.2% | +41.5% | +30.7% | +3.1% | +32.3% | +5.1% | +23.6% | +26.0% | +8.9% | +7.6% | +17.6% | +25.1% | +4.9% | +41.0% | +1.8% | +27.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| CLW Clearwater Paper Corporation | 7 of 17 | −41.5% | −17.6% | −4.5% | +3.1% | −2.9% | +76.7% | −12.3% | −46.3% | −30.7% | +44.0% | −33.6% | +30.6% | +34.1% | +10.0% | −9.0% | +42.4% | +555% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GFL GFL Environmental Inc. | 2 of 5 | −3.5% | +29.3% | +18.2% | −22.4% | +29.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | 9 of 17 | +7.4% | −3.5% | −11.7% | −17.9% | +24.8% | +26.9% | +37.8% | +1.3% | +29.0% | +23.6% | +14.9% | +29.4% | +16.1% | +20.5% | +30.1% | +17.2% | +11.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | 4 of 14 | +18.8% | +2.6% | +4.8% | −6.6% | +18.9% | +30.9% | +19.6% | −1.0% | +39.5% | +37.6% | −2.6% | +11.6% | +29.8% | +7.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How WM has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were WM's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents WM's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1988, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: WM fell 77.8% from May 1999 to March 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 14.2%.
- The slowest recovery came after WM fell 77.8% from May 1999 to March 2000; it did not regain that peak until August 2013, 13 years later.
Green means WM fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | WM fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −77.8% | +14.2% | May 1999 | Mar 2000 | 10 months | Aug 2013 | 13.4 years |
| No named crash | −73.1% | — | Jun 1988 | Jan 1990 | 19 months | Jul 1990 | 6 months |
| No named crash | −45.8% | — | Jan 1992 | Nov 1993 | 22 months | Jul 1995 | 20 months |
| No named crash | −33.1% | −18.1% | Jul 1998 | Oct 1998 | 3 months | May 1999 | 7 months |
| No named crash | −31.2% | — | Jul 1990 | Aug 1990 | 1 month | Feb 1991 | 6 months |
How did WM do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far WM, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- WM fell less than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when WM fell 32.9% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- None of its popular alternatives fell less than WM in most of the crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than WM.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM This pageWaste Management, Inc. | — | −0.9% | −16.8% | −29.5% | −10.7% | −8.6% | −6.7% | −21.7% | −0.7% | −41.5% | −32.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −5.8% | −26.6% | −64.5% | −34.9% | −8.7% | −26.9% | −18.4% | 0.0% | −48.7% | −56.8% |
| RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −1.0% | −15.1% | −33.8% | −10.6% | −9.2% | −8.8% | −18.2% | −0.4% | −53.4% | −34.4% |
| CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −3.5% | −28.1% | −34.5% | −26.6% | −4.2% | −27.9% | −29.2% | −4.1% | −96.2% | −71.7% |
| TTEK Tetra Tech, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −3.6% | −30.5% | −31.8% | −32.0% | −10.4% | −17.2% | −24.1% | −2.4% | −49.8% | −77.6% |
| PESI Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | 1 of 10 | 0.0% | −40.5% | −47.4% | −49.8% | −8.2% | −15.7% | −33.5% | −2.5% | −75.7% | −44.8% |
| DAR Darling Ingredients Inc. | 1 of 10 | −7.6% | −34.8% | −51.0% | −18.8% | −5.6% | −43.0% | −36.4% | −4.9% | −83.0% | −85.7% |
| WCN Waste Connections, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −1.6% | −20.6% | −29.6% | −11.6% | −6.7% | −11.1% | −12.7% | −1.7% | −45.0% | — |
| CLW Clearwater Paper Corporation | 2 of 8 | −7.7% | −32.7% | −53.7% | −27.7% | −25.1% | −39.1% | −15.6% | 0.0% | — | — |
| GFL GFL Environmental Inc. | 0 of 2 | −3.0% | −34.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | 2 of 8 | −3.3% | −28.9% | −31.1% | −11.8% | −5.9% | −6.8% | −13.4% | −3.2% | — | — |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | 1 of 6 | −3.8% | −37.9% | −35.9% | −24.2% | −7.2% | −12.9% | — | — | — | — |
How closely does WM move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares WM with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, WM captured 68% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 44% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.62. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
- Only RSG and CWST had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than WM's 1.54, out of ten popular alternatives with the same record.
- RSG took just 34% of the S&P 500's losses, against 44% for WM, while still keeping 71% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than WM's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM This pageWaste Management, Inc. | 68% | 44% | 1.54 | 0.62 |
| RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 71% | 34% | 2.11 | 0.55 |
| CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 106% | 68% | 1.55 | 0.85 |
| WCN Waste Connections, Inc. | 65% | 47% | 1.37 | 0.60 |
| TTEK Tetra Tech, Inc. | 94% | 76% | 1.24 | 0.88 |
| AWK American Water Works Company, Inc. | 48% | 45% | 1.07 | 0.44 |
| CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 126% | 118% | 1.06 | 1.27 |
| PESI Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. | 82% | 85% | 0.97 | 0.83 |
| DAR Darling Ingredients Inc. | 118% | 127% | 0.92 | 1.05 |
| XYL Xylem Inc. | 90% | 123% | 0.73 | 1.03 |
| CLW Clearwater Paper Corporation | 9% | 101% | 0.09 | 0.78 |
What diversifies WM?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with WM's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing WM with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in WM into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 16% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+8.1% for WM alone, +10.1% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and HDV have moved largely independently of WM over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.42 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in three of the five calendar years in which WM lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which WM lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% WM and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2011 | 2007 | 2002 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM Waste Management, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +56.2% | 0.56 | −4.5% | −7.7% | −8.7% | −28.1% | −63.1% | 18.9% | +8.1% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.39 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | — | — | — | — | 15.9% | +10.1% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.26 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −16.1% | −7.4% | — | — | 15.9% | +12.0% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.42 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | — | — | — | — | 16.5% | +9.2% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.44 | +135% | 0.97 | +21.5% | — | — | — | — | 17.1% | +10.8% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.12 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | +6.8% | +6.0% | −47.0% | — | 17.4% | +14.7% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.42 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | — | — | — | — | 16.1% | +9.5% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.19 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | +9.6% | +30.4% | — | — | 16.1% | +10.5% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.29 | +136% | 0.93 | −10.4% | — | — | — | — | 16.8% | +11.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2011 | 2007 | 2002 | 1999 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WM Waste Management, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +56.2% | 0.56 | −4.5% | −7.7% | −8.7% | −28.1% | −63.1% | 18.9% | +8.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.34 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | +8.1% | −9.8% | −8.3% | −36.8% | 17.6% | +14.1% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | -0.03 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −24.4% | −25.7% | −65.1% | +350% | 18.8% | +27.1% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.30 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | −17.0% | +2.1% | −9.4% | −58.7% | 19.7% | +22.6% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.40 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +11.8% | +29.7% | −27.2% | −71.3% | 17.7% | +13.5% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.13 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | — | — | — | — | 17.2% | +16.4% |
Common questions
What was WM's worst drawdown?
WM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1988 was 77.8%, from May 1999 to March 2000. It took about 13 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were WM's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, WM's best year was 2000, when it returned 61.5%. Its worst was 1999, with a return of -63.1%.
Is there a better investment than WM?
Among WM's popular alternatives, RSG earned more than WM over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 13.9% a year at 18.5% volatility, against 9.3% a year at 19.2%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WAB (industrial machinery) and EMR (industrial machinery) were ahead of WM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (26.2% and 27.7% volatility against 19.2%).
Is WM more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. WM's volatility over the past 5 years was 19.2%, 1.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, WM's return lands within 19.2% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is WM's Sharpe ratio?
WM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.56, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so WM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is WM with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, WM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.35 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against WM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a WM holding.
What are the best alternatives to WM?
Of the 11 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed WM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CLH and RSG.
Did WM outperform the S&P 500?
WM finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +10.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did WM do in stock market crashes?
WM fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in eight of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when WM fell 32.9% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies WM?
These had a low correlation with WM over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.39), DXJ (correlation 0.26) and HDV (correlation 0.42); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.34), CLS (correlation -0.03) and FIX (correlation 0.30). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than WM's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of WM's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.