Relative Intelligence · US Total Market

How Dimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on DFAC alone. It places DFAC (Dimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where DFAC stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: DFAC's full trading record, from June 2021 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- What you're buyingDFAC charges 0.21% a year; SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) tracks the same thing for 0.03%. A correlation of 0.98 with VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF) over 5 years: effectively the same bet as the larger fund. Better options ↓
- Right nowAfter a 20.0% loss from December 2024 to April 2025, DFAC has bounced 22.3% off the low. On the flip side, over the past 6 months, DFAC rose 7.6% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. At a glance ↓
- Fund or market?DFAC rose 2.6% over the past 3 months, in line with the US total market ETF VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF), which rose 3.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- Long termDFAC's 5-year return of 71.5% puts it ahead of 77% of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 81.7%. On the flip side, DFAC turned $10,000 into $17,100 over the past 5 years, against $18,200 in the S&P 500. Market rank ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 23.1% off DFAC, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than AVUV (Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF, 20.0%) but less than VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF, 25.2%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationDFAC is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.97 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.98 with the total US market, more closely than 94% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. DFAC fell in 20 of the 22 months the S&P 500 fell over the past 5 years: it usually fell with it. By year ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF) earned more than DFAC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.5% a year at 14.9% volatility, against 11.4% a year at 17.0%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- MGV (Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF, US large-cap value) earned more than DFAC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 12.6% a year at 13.4% volatility, against 11.4% a year at 17.0%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 39 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than DFAC with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF), FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF) and VYMI (Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF).
How much would $10,000 in DFAC have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in DFAC over the past 5 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of DFAC over the same span and DFAC's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: DFAC began trading on June 14, 2021, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 5 years of DFAC's record, starting at the end of September 2021.
- $10,000 invested in DFAC at the end of September 2021 would have grown to $17,772 by September 2026, less than the $19,000 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Seven of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of DFAC, and DYNF finished highest, at $21,051.
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,089 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of DFAC; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- DYNF$21,051+111% total · +16.1% a year
- LRGF$19,819+98.2% total · +14.7% a year
- FNDX$19,177+91.8% total · +13.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- PRF$18,834+88.3% total · +13.5% a year
- DFUS$18,701+87.0% total · +13.3% a year
- AVUS$18,575+85.8% total · +13.2% a year
- SCHB$18,104+81.0% total · +12.6% a year
- DFAC$17,772+77.7% total · +12.2% a year
- OMFL$15,993+59.9% total · +9.8% a year
DFAC at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the fund, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: DFAC began trading on June 14, 2021, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- DFAC's deepest decline since it began trading in 2021 was 23.1%, from January to September 2022. It took 15 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over four full calendar years, DFAC's best was 2023, when it returned 21.9%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 14.9%. It lost money in one of those years.
- DFAC is 2.2% below its all-time high.
The fund
- Issuer
- Dimensional
- Began trading
- June 2021
- Expense ratio
- 0.21%per year
- Assets
- $88B
- Category
- Broad Market
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +17.7%total return
- Past 3 years
- +82.3%+22.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +71.5%+11.4% a year
- Best calendar year
- +21.9%2023
- Worst calendar year
- −14.9%2022
- Losing years
- 1 of 4full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 17.0%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.72return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −23.1%Jan 2022 to Sep 2022
- From its all-time high
- −2.2%below the peak
DFAC against the whole market
Where DFAC ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does DFAC rank among all ETFs?
This section ranks DFAC on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every ETF worth at least $100 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how DFAC stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- DFAC's 1-year return ranks in the top 23% of the 2,485 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed ETFs with at least $100M in assets that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller ETFs and leveraged funds are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | DFAC | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +17.7% | 568 of 2,485 | top 23% |
| 3-year return | +82.3% | 526 of 1,949 | top 27% |
| 5-year return | +71.5% | 366 of 1,560 | top 23% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 17.0% | 835 of 1,560 | bottom 47% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.72 | 481 of 1,560 | top 31% |
What has beaten DFAC on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). DFAC sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than DFAC with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 39 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than DFAC over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half DFAC's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 35% less than DFAC's 17.0%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.72 for DFAC.
- Among DFAC's popular alternatives, FNDX and PRF are in the region. FNDX earned 13.5% a year against 11.4% a year for DFAC, at 14.9% volatility, 12% less than DFAC's 17.0%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to DFAC; faint dots are 25 more of the 39 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than DFAC?
Investments that beat DFAC over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among DFAC's popular alternatives, FNDX earned more than DFAC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.5% a year at 14.9% volatility, against 11.4% a year at 17.0%.
- A cheaper fund that has kept up over the past 5 years is SCHB (0.03% a year against 0.21%).
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MGV (US large-cap value) earned more than DFAC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 12.6% a year at 13.4% volatility, against 11.4% a year at 17.0%.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat DFAC over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes, and, for funds, the same exposure at a lower expense ratio. It checks DFAC's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than DFAC follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than DFAC's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× DFAC's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than DFAC's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with DFAC?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +11.4% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | +71.5% | 1.00 | 0.21% | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.97 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 4 shownThe investments people most often weigh against DFAC. 12 of 18 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
FNDXSchwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.5% | 14.9% | 0.93 | −37.7% | +88.6% | 0.97 | 0.25% | |
DFUSDimensional U.S. Equity ETF · US Total Market | Higher return in most periodsSame exposure, lower expense ratio | +12.3% | 17.3% | 0.76 | −24.6% | +78.8% | 0.98 | 0.09% | |
LRGFiShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF · Broad Market | Higher return in most periodsSame exposure, lower expense ratio | +13.7% | 17.1% | 0.84 | −36.0% | +89.8% | 0.98 | 0.08% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | +98.5% | 0.95 | 0.26% | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 4 shownEverything else in US Total Market and the categories next to it (US Large-Cap Equity, US Large-Cap Value, US Small-Cap Equity, Investment Grade Bonds), plus DFAC's specific themes. 31 of 84 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +109% | 0.87 | 0.15% | |
MGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatility | +12.6% | 13.4% | 0.95 | −35.4% | +81.0% | 0.90 | 0.05% | |
| Higher return in most periods | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +97.2% | 0.83 | 0.18% | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +85.4% | 0.85 | 0.04% | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 145 of 3,531 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | 0.63 | 0.40% | |
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +122% | 0.66 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +98.2% | 0.33 | — | ||
DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | +92.0% | 0.92 | 0.05% | |
PWVInvesco Large Cap Value ETF · Broad Market | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +13.5% | 14.2% | 0.97 | −37.6% | +88.7% | 0.86 | 0.55% | |
FJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January · Multi-Asset | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +11.1% | 10.5% | 1.05 | −13.6% | +69.0% | 0.91 | 0.85% | |
JVALJPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF · Broad Market | Higher return in most periodsSame exposure, lower expense ratio | +12.0% | 17.2% | 0.75 | −40.4% | +76.5% | 0.98 | 0.12% | |
PJULInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Broad Market | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatility | +10.5% | 8.6% | 1.20 | −18.2% | +64.4% | 0.92 | 0.79% | |
What these numbers mean for DFAC
- Annual return
- DFAC returned 11.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $17,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- DFAC's volatility over the past 5 years was 17.0%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, DFAC's return lands within 17.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- DFAC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.72, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so DFAC earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- DFAC's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 23.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 23.1% fall takes a 30.1% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, DFAC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.97 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against DFAC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a DFAC holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 39 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than DFAC with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 29 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with DFAC | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EPSWisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.5% | 16.1% | 0.82 | −35.8% | +80.4% | 0.98 | 0.08% |
| 2 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | 0.63 | 0.40% |
| 3 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Same or nearby category | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | +111% | 0.94 | 0.56% |
| 4 | IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.8% | 0.94 | −35.8% | +81.4% | 0.92 | 0.20% |
| 5 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | +92.0% | 0.92 | 0.05% |
| 6 | PWVInvesco Large Cap Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.2% | 0.97 | −37.6% | +88.7% | 0.86 | 0.55% |
| 7 | FDRRFidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.6% | 15.0% | 0.87 | −36.5% | +81.4% | 0.94 | 0.15% |
| 8 | FYLDCambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.0% | 0.85 | −44.6% | +84.9% | 0.67 | 0.59% |
| 9 | IDOGALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 15.6% | 0.93 | −37.3% | +93.7% | 0.64 | 0.50% |
| 10 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +89.0% | 0.71 | 0.31% |
| 11 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +83.3% | 0.68 | 0.08% |
| 12 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +85.9% | 0.93 | 0.15% |
| 13 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +85.0% | 0.84 | 0.35% |
| 14 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +91.8% | 0.69 | 0.43% |
| 15 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | +88.9% | 0.96 | 0.12% |
| 16 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +101% | 0.70 | 0.95% |
| 17 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +93.4% | 0.61 | 0.60% |
| 18 | MGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Same or nearby category | +12.6% | 13.4% | 0.95 | −35.4% | +81.0% | 0.90 | 0.05% |
| 19 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Same or nearby category | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +90.2% | 0.96 | 0.39% |
| 20 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +83.4% | 0.19 | 0.98% |
| 21 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +87.6% | 0.77 | 0.09% |
| 22 | HDEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +12.8% | 14.2% | 0.92 | −36.4% | +82.4% | 0.63 | 0.09% |
| 23 | AUSFGlobal X - Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF · International | Whole market | +13.2% | 13.6% | 0.99 | −44.2% | +86.0% | 0.83 | 0.27% |
| 24 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +88.1% | 0.95 | 0.19% |
| 25 | DTHWisdomTree International High Dividend Fund · International | Whole market | +13.0% | 15.1% | 0.89 | −40.8% | +84.5% | 0.64 | 0.58% |
| 26 | DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF · International | Whole market | +13.8% | 15.1% | 0.94 | −34.4% | +91.1% | 0.89 | 0.50% |
| 27 | SIXAETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.8% | 12.7% | 1.01 | −18.4% | +82.3% | 0.88 | 0.31% |
| 28 | QDEFNorthern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.7% | 0.94 | −35.7% | +81.6% | 0.95 | 0.40% |
| 29 | IGLDFT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF · Multi-Asset | Whole market | +12.5% | 16.1% | 0.82 | −99.1% | +80.3% | 0.20 | 0.85% |
DFAC against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against DFAC, compared period by period and year by year.
How do DFAC's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at DFAC, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- FNDX, PRF and GSLC were both more rewarding and calmer than DFAC over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, DFAC returned 11.4% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with lower volatility (17.0% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than DFAC with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | +14.7% | 17.5% |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | +13.7% | 17.1% |
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | +13.5% | 14.9% |
| PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | +13.0% | 15.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF | +12.3% | 17.3% |
| AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | +12.2% | 17.2% |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | +11.6% | 16.7% |
| SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | +11.6% | 17.3% |
| DFAC This pageDimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF | +11.4% | 17.0% |
| AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | +10.5% | 22.1% |
| DFAX Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | +9.8% | 16.1% |
| DFAT Dimensional - US Targeted Value ETF | +9.6% | 21.0% |
| OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | +9.0% | 16.4% |
| DFAS Dimensional - US Small Cap ETF | +7.1% | 20.5% |
| BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | −0.4% | 6.1% |
Has DFAC consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares DFAC with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than DFAC helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- FNDX and PRF outperformed DFAC in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- Two of the 22 popular alternatives, FNDX and PRF, outperformed DFAC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than DFAC over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| DFAC Dimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF (this page) | — | −0.2% | +2.6% | +7.6% | +14.2% | +17.7% | +82.3% | +71.5% | 17.0% | 0.72 | −23.1% | 0.21% | $88B | — |
| FNDX QualifiedSchwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | 5/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | +1.6% | +4.7% | +11.9% | +20.5% | +25.4% | +88.2% | +88.6% | 14.9% | 0.93 | −37.7% | 0.25% | $28B | 83% |
| PRF QualifiedInvesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 5/5 short2/2 longAll-weather | +1.2% | +4.2% | +11.7% | +20.2% | +25.5% | +90.1% | +84.3% | 15.0% | 0.90 | −38.1% | 0.34% | $10B | 87% |
| DYNF Broad MarketiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 2/5 short2/2 long | −1.9% | +3.4% | +9.1% | +14.1% | +17.1% | +106% | +98.5% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | 0.26% | $42B | 85% |
| LRGF Broad MarketiShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 2/5 short2/2 long | −0.5% | +4.3% | +10.1% | +13.9% | +15.0% | +91.5% | +89.8% | 17.1% | 0.84 | −36.0% | 0.08% | $3.7B | 87% |
| DFUS Broad MarketDimensional U.S. Equity ETF | 2/5 short2/2 long | −0.7% | +3.5% | +8.7% | +13.3% | +15.7% | +88.9% | +78.8% | 17.3% | 0.76 | −24.6% | 0.09% | $21B | 88% |
| SPTM Broad MarketState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 2/5 short2/2 long | −0.6% | +3.4% | +8.4% | +13.3% | +15.7% | +87.2% | +78.6% | 16.9% | 0.77 | −34.7% | 0.03% | $14B | 89% |
| AVUS Broad MarketAvantis U.S. Equity ETF | 2/5 short2/2 long | −0.6% | +2.3% | +8.0% | +15.8% | +19.9% | +87.2% | +77.9% | 17.2% | 0.76 | −37.0% | 0.15% | $15B | 95% |
| DFAU Broad MarketDimensional - US Core Equity Market ETF | 2/5 short2/2 long | −0.5% | +3.3% | +8.4% | +13.5% | +16.2% | +86.3% | +76.9% | 17.1% | 0.76 | −23.6% | 0.12% | $13B | 91% |
| AVLC Broad MarketAvantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 3/5 short1/2 long | −0.6% | +3.0% | +8.8% | +15.9% | +19.6% | +91.9% | — | — | — | −19.6% | 0.15% | $1.6B | 93% |
| SCHB Broad MarketSchwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 2/5 short1/2 long | −0.9% | +3.2% | +8.3% | +13.1% | +15.2% | +88.0% | +72.9% | 17.3% | 0.72 | −35.3% | 0.03% | $44B | 87% |
| ITOT Broad MarketiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 2/5 short1/2 long | −0.8% | +3.2% | +8.2% | +13.1% | +15.2% | +88.0% | +72.7% | 17.4% | 0.72 | −35.0% | 0.03% | $96B | 88% |
| VTI Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | 2/5 short1/2 long | −0.8% | +3.2% | +8.3% | +13.1% | +15.2% | +87.9% | +72.6% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | 0.03% | $2.3T | 87% |
| OMFL Broad MarketInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 5/5 short0/2 long | +1.5% | +4.5% | +10.3% | +16.6% | +19.5% | +66.6% | +54.1% | 16.4% | 0.61 | −33.2% | 0.29% | $4.8B | 85% |
| DFLV Broad MarketDimensional - US Large Cap Value ETF | 5/5 short0/2 long | +1.1% | +4.8% | +12.0% | +21.5% | +28.6% | +82.7% | — | — | — | −16.8% | 0.21% | $7.2B | 76% |
| GSLC Broad MarketGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | 0.0% | +4.2% | +8.5% | +11.9% | +14.0% | +83.5% | +73.1% | 16.7% | 0.74 | −33.7% | 0.09% | $15B | 85% |
| AVUV Broad MarketAvantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | −0.4% | −2.6% | +3.0% | +18.4% | +24.4% | +70.2% | +64.9% | 22.1% | 0.56 | −49.4% | 0.25% | $31B | 66% |
| DFAT Broad MarketDimensional - US Targeted Value ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | 0.0% | −1.7% | +3.6% | +15.3% | +20.5% | +64.5% | +57.8% | 21.0% | 0.54 | −26.1% | 0.33% | $30B | 69% |
| DFEM InternationalDimensional - Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | 1/5 short0/2 long | −6.4% | +1.7% | +0.6% | +14.2% | +18.3% | +80.9% | — | — | — | −20.8% | 0.39% | $9.3B | 86% |
| DFAX InternationalDimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 0/5 short0/2 long | −3.6% | +2.3% | +1.1% | +12.0% | +17.9% | +82.8% | +59.3% | 16.1% | 0.66 | −28.1% | 0.28% | $12B | 80% |
| DFAS Broad MarketDimensional - US Small Cap ETF | 0/5 short0/2 long | −0.9% | −2.2% | +2.0% | +12.4% | +15.5% | +62.0% | +41.2% | 20.5% | 0.44 | −26.1% | 0.31% | $34B | 80% |
| BND BondsVanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0/5 short0/2 long | −0.6% | −2.0% | −2.8% | −1.8% | −2.1% | +15.7% | −1.8% | 6.1% | -0.03 | −18.6% | 0.03% | $389B | — |
| DFIC InternationalDimensional - International Core Equity 2 ETF | 0/5 short0/2 long | −1.9% | +2.2% | +1.5% | +10.6% | +17.1% | +82.4% | — | — | — | −24.4% | 0.22% | $15B | 73% |
How did DFAC do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2022, along with where DFAC ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with DFAC and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: DFAC began trading on June 14, 2021, so the table starts with 2022, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
- DFAC finished ahead of the S&P 500 in one of its four full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, DYNF came out ahead of DFAC most often, in three of the four years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, DFAC finished in the top quarter in no of four years and in the bottom quarter in no. In 2025, it ranked 14 of 19.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of DFAC; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places DFAC among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of DFAC | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAC This pageDimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF | — | +15.7% | +19.6% | +21.9% | −14.9% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 0 of 4 | 14 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 7 of 18 | 11 of 15 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 4 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% |
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | 2 of 4 | +16.9% | +16.7% | +18.3% | −7.0% |
| PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 2 of 4 | +18.4% | +16.7% | +15.7% | −7.8% |
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 3 of 4 | +20.0% | +30.3% | +36.2% | −20.3% |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 3 of 4 | +16.5% | +26.6% | +25.8% | −14.8% |
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF | 3 of 4 | +17.4% | +24.3% | +26.4% | −18.3% |
| AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 3 of 4 | +16.7% | +20.4% | +21.8% | −13.8% |
| AVLC Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 2 of 2 | +17.6% | +22.8% | — | — |
| SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 3 of 4 | +16.9% | +23.9% | +26.1% | −19.4% |
| OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1 of 4 | +13.6% | +6.8% | +21.6% | −14.0% |
| DFLV Dimensional - US Large Cap Value ETF | 0 of 3 | +15.9% | +12.9% | +12.3% | — |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 2 of 4 | +16.2% | +24.2% | +25.1% | −18.7% |
| AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | 2 of 4 | +7.4% | +9.3% | +22.8% | −4.9% |
| DFAT Dimensional - US Targeted Value ETF | 1 of 4 | +8.7% | +7.8% | +20.9% | −6.2% |
| DFEM Dimensional - Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | 1 of 3 | +29.5% | +7.6% | +13.9% | — |
| DFAX Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 1 of 4 | +35.4% | +4.8% | +16.6% | −14.5% |
| DFAS Dimensional - US Small Cap ETF | 1 of 4 | +8.2% | +10.2% | +17.8% | −13.9% |
| BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 1 of 4 | +7.1% | +1.4% | +5.7% | −13.1% |
| DFIC Dimensional - International Core Equity 2 ETF | 1 of 3 | +37.0% | +4.1% | +17.3% | — |
Risk and diversification
How DFAC has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were DFAC's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents DFAC's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2021, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: DFAC began trading on June 14, 2021, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In three of DFAC's five worst declines, it fell less than the S&P 500 did over the same dates.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 15 months, after DFAC fell 23.1% from January to September 2022.
Green means DFAC fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | DFAC fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 bear market | −23.1% | −24.3% | Jan 2022 | Sep 2022 | 8 months | Dec 2023 | 15 months |
| No named crash | −20.0% | −17.8% | Dec 2024 | Apr 2025 | 4 months | Jul 2025 | 3 months |
| No named crash | −8.5% | −8.7% | Feb 2026 | Mar 2026 | 1 month | Apr 2026 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −8.3% | −8.4% | Jul 2024 | Aug 2024 | 1 month | Sep 2024 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −5.8% | −5.3% | Mar 2024 | Apr 2024 | 1 month | May 2024 | 1 month |
How did DFAC do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far DFAC, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: DFAC began trading on June 14, 2021, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- Among its popular alternatives, FNDX held up best, falling less than DFAC in all two crashes they both traded through.
- DFAC began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but two of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was BND's 9.3%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
- DFAC fell less than the S&P 500 in one of the two crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DFAC fell 23.1% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than DFAC.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAC This pageDimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF | — | −4.9% | −23.1% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | 2 of 2 | −4.2% | −19.1% | −37.4% | −19.6% | −6.2% | −12.4% | — | — | — | — |
| PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1 of 2 | −4.6% | −19.7% | −38.0% | −19.7% | −6.4% | −13.6% | −19.4% | −1.5% | −60.1% | — |
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.6% | −26.0% | −34.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 2 of 2 | −4.1% | −21.6% | −36.0% | −21.3% | −6.2% | −15.2% | — | — | — | — |
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.9% | −24.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 1 of 2 | −5.2% | −22.2% | −37.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1 of 2 | −4.0% | −25.3% | −35.3% | −20.5% | −6.2% | −14.5% | −19.0% | −1.6% | — | — |
| OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 2 of 2 | −2.2% | −21.5% | −32.8% | −18.2% | −6.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| DFLV Dimensional - US Large Cap Value ETF | 0 of 1 | −5.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.4% | −24.6% | −33.7% | −19.6% | −6.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | 1 of 2 | −9.3% | −20.0% | −46.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DFAT Dimensional - US Targeted Value ETF | 1 of 2 | −8.7% | −19.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DFEM Dimensional - Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | 1 of 1 | −2.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DFAX Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 1 of 2 | −2.7% | −27.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DFAS Dimensional - US Small Cap ETF | 0 of 2 | −7.2% | −23.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 2 of 2 | 0.0% | −14.6% | −8.7% | −1.1% | −0.9% | −1.5% | −1.1% | −0.2% | −9.3% | — |
| DFIC Dimensional - International Core Equity 2 ETF | 1 of 1 | −2.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does DFAC move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares DFAC with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- Nine of the 14 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than DFAC's 0.94, led by DYNF, FNDX and LRGF.
- DFAX took just 80% of the S&P 500's losses, against 102% for DFAC, while still keeping 79% of its gains.
- Over the past 5 years, DFAC captured 97% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 102% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.98. Its share of the market's losses was slightly larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than DFAC's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAC This pageDimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF | 97% | 102% | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 106% | 97% | 1.09 | 1.02 |
| FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | 95% | 90% | 1.06 | 0.88 |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 100% | 95% | 1.05 | 0.98 |
| PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 93% | 90% | 1.04 | 0.88 |
| DFAX Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 79% | 80% | 0.99 | 0.76 |
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF | 100% | 101% | 0.98 | 1.01 |
| AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 99% | 101% | 0.98 | 1.00 |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 97% | 101% | 0.96 | 0.98 |
| SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 99% | 104% | 0.95 | 1.02 |
| AVUV Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | 98% | 111% | 0.89 | 1.02 |
| OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 87% | 99% | 0.88 | 0.94 |
| DFAT Dimensional - US Targeted Value ETF | 94% | 110% | 0.86 | 0.99 |
| DFAS Dimensional - US Small Cap ETF | 91% | 116% | 0.78 | 1.03 |
| BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 19% | 39% | 0.48 | 0.26 |
What diversifies DFAC?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with DFAC's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing DFAC with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in DFAC into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 22% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+12.2% for DFAC alone, +12.2% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, GLD, XLE and DBMF have moved largely independently of DFAC over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.39 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- In 2022, the one year DFAC lost money (-14.9%), DBMF returned +21.6%.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which DFAC lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% DFAC and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAC Dimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +71.5% | 0.72 | −14.9% | 15.9% | +12.2% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.16 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | 13.7% | +13.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | 15.5% | +14.8% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.24 | +59.7% | 0.82 | +21.6% | 12.3% | +12.2% |
| DBA AlternativesInvesco DB Agriculture Fund | 0.20 | +66.4% | 0.81 | +2.5% | 13.3% | +12.2% |
| GDX MaterialsVanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.30 | +181% | 0.73 | −9.0% | 16.6% | +16.0% |
| USO CommoditiesUnited States Oil Fund, LP | 0.02 | +176% | 0.73 | +29.0% | 14.9% | +15.5% |
| FLSP AlternativesFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETF | 0.04 | +49.8% | 0.68 | +0.5% | 12.9% | +11.7% |
| PDBC AlternativesInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 0.12 | +73.9% | 0.67 | +19.3% | 13.6% | +12.7% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAC Dimensional - US Core Equity 2 ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +71.5% | 0.72 | −14.9% | 15.9% | +12.2% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.33 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | 15.3% | +17.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.23 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | 14.7% | +17.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.32 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | 16.0% | +19.6% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.42 | +1,008% | 1.34 | +87.5% | 18.8% | +22.5% |
| PBR Oil & Gas IntegratedPetróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras | 0.18 | +667% | 1.28 | +55.4% | 15.9% | +19.4% |
Common questions
What was DFAC's worst drawdown?
DFAC's deepest decline since it began trading in 2021 was 23.1%, from January to September 2022. It took 15 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because DFAC launched in June 2021, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or six other sell-offs.
What were DFAC's best and worst years?
Over four full calendar years, DFAC's best year was 2023, when it returned 21.9%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -14.9%.
Is there a better investment than DFAC?
Among DFAC's popular alternatives, FNDX earned more than DFAC with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.5% a year at 14.9% volatility, against 11.4% a year at 17.0%. A cheaper fund that has kept up over the past 5 years is SCHB (0.03% a year against 0.21%).
Is DFAC more volatile than the S&P 500?
No. DFAC's volatility over the past 5 years was 17.0%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, DFAC's return lands within 17.0% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is DFAC's Sharpe ratio?
DFAC's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.72, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so DFAC earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is DFAC with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, DFAC's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.97 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against DFAC instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a DFAC holding.
What are the best alternatives to DFAC?
Of the 22 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed DFAC in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: FNDX and PRF.
Did DFAC outperform the S&P 500?
DFAC finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of four full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +15.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did DFAC do in stock market crashes?
DFAC fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the two major crashes it has traded through, and further in one. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DFAC fell 23.1% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies DFAC?
These had a low correlation with DFAC over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, GLD (correlation 0.16), XLE (correlation 0.39) and DBMF (correlation -0.24); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.33), MCK (correlation 0.23) and MPC (correlation 0.32). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than DFAC's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of DFAC's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to DFAC
DYNFiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
SCHBSchwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
VTIVanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
BNDVanguard Total Bond Market ETF