Relative Intelligence · US Multifactor Equity

How iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on DYNF alone. It places DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where DYNF stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: DYNF's full trading record, from March 2019 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- What you're buyingFor a correlation of 0.99 with the S&P 500, DYNF is effectively an S&P 500 fund, while charging 0.26% a year against VOO's 0.03%. Market capture ↓
- Right nowNot every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) rose 6.4% and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) fell 2.0%. Both DYNF and the S&P 500 are within a few percent of a record high. Consistency ↓
- Fund or market?DYNF rose 3.4% over the past 3 months, in line with the US multifactor equity ETF LRGF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF), which rose 4.3%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its similar funds did not move as one over the past 3 months: USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) rose 6.4%, while MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) fell 2.0%.
- Long termOver the past 5 years, DYNF returned 14.7% a year against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500 (98.5% in total against 81.7%). DYNF's 5-year return of 98.5% puts it ahead of 92% of the ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashThe 2022 bear market took 26.0% off DYNF, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF, 17.0%) but less than QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF, 27.5%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationDYNF is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.99 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.99 with the total US market, more closely than 96% of ETFs with at least $100 million in assets. When the S&P 500 had a down month, DYNF usually fell with it (20 of 22 months). By year ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) was ahead of DYNF in most short and long periods.
- Nearby categories and themes
- PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF, US large-cap value) earned more than DYNF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 16.1% a year at 15.1% volatility, against 14.7% a year at 17.5%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than DYNF with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF).
How much would $10,000 in DYNF have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in DYNF over the past 7 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of DYNF over the same span and DYNF's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: DYNF began trading on March 21, 2019, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. It covers the most recent 7 years of DYNF's record, starting at the end of September 2019.
- $10,000 invested in DYNF at the end of September 2019 would have grown to $29,610 by September 2026, more than the $28,402 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of DYNF, and CAH finished highest, at $56,098.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2019 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 662 of the 3,144 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of DYNF; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CAH$56,098+461% total · +27.9% a year
- ABBV$46,015+360% total · +24.4% a year
- DXJ$43,294+333% total · +23.3% a year
- SPMO$40,508+305% total · +22.1% a year
- VUG$33,914+239% total · +19.1% a year
- DYNF$29,610+196% total · +16.8% a year
- MTUM$28,690+187% total · +16.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$28,402+184% total · +16.1% a year
- JQUA$27,744+177% total · +15.7% a year
- VTV$23,017+130% total · +12.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 713 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of DYNF; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- CAH$49,682+397% total · +37.8% a year
- DXJ$32,976+230% total · +27.0% a year
- SPMO$26,579+166% total · +21.6% a year
- VLUE$22,395+124% total · +17.5% a year
- PVAL$21,761+118% total · +16.8% a year
- DYNF$21,051+111% total · +16.1% a year
- JQUA$19,289+92.9% total · +14.0% a year
- MTUM$19,134+91.3% total · +13.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- VTV$17,967+79.7% total · +12.4% a year
DYNF at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the fund, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: DYNF began trading on March 21, 2019, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
- DYNF's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 34.7%, from February to March 2020. It took six months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over six full calendar years, DYNF's best was 2023, when it returned 36.2%, and its worst was 2022, when it lost 20.3%. It lost money in one of those years.
- DYNF is 2.3% below its all-time high.
The fund
- Issuer
- IShares
- Began trading
- March 2019
- Expense ratio
- 0.26%per year
- Assets
- $42B
- Category
- Broad Market
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +17.1%total return
- Past 3 years
- +106%+27.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +98.5%+14.7% a year
- Best calendar year
- +36.2%2023
- Worst calendar year
- −20.3%2022
- Losing years
- 1 of 6full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 17.5%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.87return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −34.7%Feb 2020 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- −2.3%below the peak
DYNF against the whole market
Where DYNF ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does DYNF rank among all ETFs?
This section ranks DYNF on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every ETF worth at least $100 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how DYNF stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- DYNF's 5-year return ranks in the top 8% of the 1,560 ETFs with at least $100 million in assets with 5 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed ETFs with at least $100M in assets that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller ETFs and leveraged funds are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | DYNF | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +17.1% | 616 of 2,485 | top 25% |
| 3-year return | +106% | 194 of 1,949 | top 10% |
| 5-year return | +98.5% | 128 of 1,560 | top 8% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 17.5% | 914 of 1,560 | bottom 42% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.87 | 231 of 1,560 | top 15% |
What has beaten DYNF on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). DYNF sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than DYNF with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Two ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than DYNF over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half DYNF's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 37% less than DYNF's 17.5%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.87 for DYNF.
- None of DYNF's popular alternatives made it, but PVAL (US large-cap value) did: 16.1% a year at 15.1% volatility, 14% less than DYNF's 17.5%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to DYNF. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
Is there a better investment than DYNF?
Investments that beat DYNF over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among DYNF's popular alternatives, SPMO was ahead of DYNF in most short and long periods.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PVAL (US large-cap value) earned more than DYNF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 16.1% a year at 15.1% volatility, against 14.7% a year at 17.5%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only two of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than DYNF with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them PVAL and LVHI.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat DYNF over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes, and, for funds, the same exposure at a lower expense ratio. It checks DYNF's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than DYNF follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than DYNF's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× DYNF's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than DYNF's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 5Y returntotal | Corr. with DYNF?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | +98.5% | 1.00 | 0.26% | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +81.7% | 0.99 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against DYNF. 1 of 22 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +136% | 0.84 | 0.13% | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 2 shownEverything else in US Multifactor Equity and the categories next to it (US Total Market, US Quality Equity, US Large-Cap Equity, US Momentum Equity), plus DYNF's specific themes. 2 of 53 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatility | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | +111% | 0.85 | 0.56% | |
VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return in most periods | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +109% | 0.80 | 0.15% | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 64 of 3,559 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +225% | 0.51 | 0.48% | |
| On the frontierHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +479% | 0.28 | — | ||
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | 0.51 | 0.40% | |
GLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares Trust · Gold | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.1% | 18.9% | 0.98 | −26.3% | +130% | 0.12 | 0.10% | |
| Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +218% | 0.15 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +159% | 0.20 | — | ||
SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | +156% | 0.05 | 0.80% | |
GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Similar return, lower volatility | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +93.4% | 0.47 | 0.60% | |
What these numbers mean for DYNF
- Annual return
- DYNF returned 14.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $19,900. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- DYNF's volatility over the past 5 years was 17.5%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, DYNF's return lands within 17.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- DYNF's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.87, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so DYNF earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- DYNF's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 34.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 34.7% fall takes a 53.2% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, DYNF's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.99 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against DYNF instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a DYNF holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 2 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than DYNF with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. Best first; funds that hold the same thing are listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 5Y return | Corr. with DYNF | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +119% | 0.51 | 0.40% |
| 2 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Same or nearby category | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | +111% | 0.85 | 0.56% |
DYNF against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against DYNF, compared period by period and year by year.
How do DYNF's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at DYNF, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives earned more than DYNF over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 14.7% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (17.5% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than DYNF with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | +18.7% | 20.8% |
| DYNF This pageiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | +14.7% | 17.5% |
| FLQL Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF | +13.8% | 16.3% |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | +13.7% | 17.1% |
| JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | +13.6% | 15.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF | +12.3% | 17.3% |
| VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | +12.3% | 22.5% |
| ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | +12.3% | 14.4% |
| AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | +12.2% | 17.2% |
| VTV Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | +12.0% | 13.7% |
| SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | +12.0% | 16.7% |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | +11.6% | 16.7% |
| VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | +11.5% | 17.5% |
| QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | +11.4% | 17.3% |
| QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | +11.1% | 14.2% |
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | +10.9% | 22.1% |
| DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | +9.1% | 15.4% |
| OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | +9.0% | 16.4% |
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | +7.6% | 12.3% |
| SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | +5.5% | 12.6% |
| IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | +5.2% | 22.4% |
Has DYNF consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares DYNF with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over seven periods from one month to five years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than DYNF helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 22 popular alternatives, SPMO, outperformed DYNF in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes.
- SPMO, JQUA and FLQL earned more for the risk they took than DYNF (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than DYNF over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (this page) | — | −1.9% | +3.4% | +9.1% | +14.1% | +17.1% | +106% | +98.5% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | 0.26% | $42B | — |
| SPMO QualifiedInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 3/5 short2/2 long | −6.7% | −1.6% | +11.6% | +19.3% | +18.1% | +156% | +136% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | 0.13% | $22B | 82% |
| MTUM Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 1/5 short1/2 long | −6.5% | −2.0% | +8.5% | +17.5% | +17.2% | +119% | +68.0% | 22.1% | 0.58 | −34.1% | 0.15% | $19B | 78% |
| JQUA Broad MarketJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 5/5 short0/2 long | +1.9% | +6.2% | +16.0% | +21.2% | +22.2% | +84.2% | +88.9% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | 0.12% | $9.2B | 89% |
| VTV Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 5/5 short0/2 long | +1.6% | +4.0% | +11.0% | +18.2% | +22.5% | +77.9% | +76.6% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | 0.03% | $252B | 64% |
| OMFL Broad MarketInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 5/5 short0/2 long | +1.5% | +4.5% | +10.3% | +16.6% | +19.5% | +66.6% | +54.1% | 16.4% | 0.61 | −33.2% | 0.29% | $4.8B | 86% |
| ROUS Broad MarketHartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 4/5 short0/2 long | +1.6% | +4.4% | +9.5% | +18.9% | +21.1% | +81.7% | +78.6% | 14.4% | 0.88 | −35.5% | 0.19% | $780M | 86% |
| LRGF Broad MarketiShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 3/5 short0/2 long | −0.5% | +4.3% | +10.1% | +13.9% | +15.0% | +91.5% | +89.8% | 17.1% | 0.84 | −36.0% | 0.08% | $3.7B | 90% |
| AVUS Broad MarketAvantis U.S. Equity ETF | 3/5 short0/2 long | −0.6% | +2.3% | +8.0% | +15.8% | +19.9% | +87.2% | +77.9% | 17.2% | 0.76 | −37.0% | 0.15% | $15B | 86% |
| QUAL Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 3/5 short0/2 long | +1.2% | +4.3% | +9.7% | +14.0% | +16.4% | +76.9% | +71.5% | 17.3% | 0.71 | −34.1% | 0.15% | $48B | 92% |
| GSLC Broad MarketGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | 0.0% | +4.2% | +8.5% | +11.9% | +14.0% | +83.5% | +73.1% | 16.7% | 0.74 | −33.7% | 0.09% | $15B | 91% |
| QUS Broad MarketState Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | +1.8% | +5.1% | +9.5% | +13.4% | +15.9% | +71.9% | +69.3% | 14.2% | 0.81 | −33.8% | 0.15% | $1.6B | 85% |
| DEUS Broad MarketXtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | +2.4% | +1.3% | +6.3% | +14.7% | +16.6% | +66.2% | +54.6% | 15.4% | 0.65 | −40.5% | 0.17% | $297M | 63% |
| USMV Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 2/5 short0/2 long | +3.3% | +6.4% | +8.7% | +10.4% | +9.7% | +49.7% | +44.4% | 12.3% | 0.66 | −33.1% | 0.15% | $24B | 80% |
| SPY Broad MarketState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1/5 short0/2 long | −0.6% | +3.9% | +9.1% | +13.5% | +15.8% | +89.3% | +81.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | 0.09% | $823B | 92% |
| DFUS Broad MarketDimensional U.S. Equity ETF | 1/5 short0/2 long | −0.7% | +3.5% | +8.7% | +13.3% | +15.7% | +88.9% | +78.8% | 17.3% | 0.76 | −24.6% | 0.09% | $21B | 92% |
| VUG Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | 1/5 short0/2 long | −2.5% | +4.0% | +8.2% | +9.8% | +10.2% | +100% | +78.6% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −35.6% | 0.03% | $392B | 73% |
| DFAU Broad MarketDimensional - US Core Equity Market ETF | 1/5 short0/2 long | −0.5% | +3.3% | +8.4% | +13.5% | +16.2% | +86.3% | +76.9% | 17.1% | 0.76 | −23.6% | 0.12% | $13B | 90% |
| SPHQ Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1/5 short0/2 long | −0.6% | 0.0% | +5.2% | +12.7% | +14.9% | +75.6% | +76.1% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | 0.20% | $19B | 82% |
| VTI Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | 1/5 short0/2 long | −0.8% | +3.2% | +8.3% | +13.1% | +15.2% | +87.9% | +72.6% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | 0.03% | $2.3T | 92% |
| SPLV Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 1/5 short0/2 long | +3.5% | −1.5% | +1.5% | +6.7% | +4.6% | +36.8% | +30.8% | 12.6% | 0.49 | −36.3% | 0.25% | $7.1B | — |
| FLQL Broad MarketFranklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF | 0/5 short0/2 long | −1.5% | +2.1% | +6.1% | +13.0% | +15.3% | +90.5% | +90.8% | 16.3% | 0.88 | −33.6% | 0.15% | $2.2B | 92% |
| IWM Broad MarketiShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0/5 short0/2 long | −3.4% | −5.4% | −0.1% | +11.6% | +12.3% | +71.3% | +29.0% | 22.4% | 0.34 | −41.1% | 0.19% | $75B | 65% |
How did DYNF do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2020, along with where DYNF ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with DYNF and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: DYNF began trading on March 21, 2019, so the table starts with 2020, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
- DYNF finished ahead of the S&P 500 in three of its six full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, DYNF finished in the top quarter in three of six years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 3 of 21.
- Among its popular alternatives, SPMO came out ahead of DYNF most often, in four of the six years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of DYNF; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places DYNF among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of DYNF | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYNF This pageiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | — | +20.0% | +30.3% | +36.2% | −20.3% | +24.9% | +13.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 6 | 3 of 21 | 4 of 21 | 2 of 21 | 18 of 21 | 15 of 20 | 12 of 20 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 3 of 6 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% |
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 4 of 6 | +26.6% | +45.8% | +17.6% | −10.4% | +22.7% | +28.2% |
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 4 of 6 | +22.1% | +32.9% | +9.2% | −18.3% | +13.4% | +29.8% |
| JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 3 of 6 | +11.7% | +21.2% | +25.1% | −13.4% | +28.7% | +16.6% |
| VTV Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 2 of 6 | +15.3% | +16.0% | +9.3% | −2.1% | +26.5% | +2.3% |
| OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 3 of 6 | +13.6% | +6.8% | +21.6% | −14.0% | +28.9% | +20.9% |
| ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 2 of 6 | +15.2% | +17.6% | +15.0% | −9.6% | +27.3% | +6.6% |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 1 of 6 | +16.5% | +26.6% | +25.8% | −14.8% | +25.0% | +11.1% |
| AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 3 of 6 | +16.7% | +20.4% | +21.8% | −13.8% | +28.7% | +17.6% |
| QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 2 of 6 | +12.7% | +22.3% | +30.9% | −20.5% | +26.9% | +17.0% |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 3 of 6 | +16.2% | +24.2% | +25.1% | −18.7% | +27.2% | +19.0% |
| QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 2 of 6 | +14.1% | +19.0% | +21.8% | −14.1% | +26.7% | +12.4% |
| DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 2 of 6 | +10.4% | +14.3% | +14.7% | −11.2% | +26.3% | +8.8% |
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1 of 6 | +7.6% | +15.7% | +10.3% | −9.4% | +20.8% | +5.7% |
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF | 1 of 4 | +17.4% | +24.3% | +26.4% | −18.3% | — | — |
| VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | 4 of 6 | +19.4% | +32.7% | +46.8% | −33.1% | +27.4% | +40.2% |
| SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 3 of 6 | +13.3% | +25.4% | +24.8% | −15.8% | +28.0% | +17.4% |
| VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | 2 of 6 | +17.1% | +23.8% | +26.0% | −19.5% | +25.7% | +21.1% |
| SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 1 of 6 | +4.1% | +13.9% | +0.5% | −4.9% | +24.1% | −1.4% |
| FLQL Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF | 2 of 6 | +19.6% | +24.3% | +23.5% | −14.8% | +26.6% | +10.7% |
| IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1 of 6 | +12.7% | +11.4% | +16.8% | −20.5% | +14.5% | +20.0% |
Risk and diversification
How DYNF has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were DYNF's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents DYNF's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2019, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: DYNF began trading on March 21, 2019, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In four of DYNF's five worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- None of these declines kept DYNF below its old high for long; the longest climb back took ten months.
Green means DYNF fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | DYNF fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covid crash | −34.7% | −33.7% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Sep 2020 | 6 months |
| 2022 bear market | −27.0% | −22.7% | Nov 2021 | Sep 2022 | 10 months | Jul 2023 | 10 months |
| No named crash | −18.7% | −18.8% | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 | 2 months | Jun 2025 | 2 months |
| No named crash | −10.5% | −10.0% | Jul 2023 | Oct 2023 | 3 months | Nov 2023 | 1 month |
| No named crash | −9.3% | −8.4% | Jul 2024 | Aug 2024 | 1 month | Sep 2024 | 1 month |
How did DYNF do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far DYNF, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: DYNF began trading on March 21, 2019, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- DYNF fell further than the S&P 500 in two of the three crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DYNF fell 26.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, SPMO held up best, falling less than DYNF in all three crashes they both traded through.
- DYNF began trading after the 2008 financial crisis, but five of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was VUG's 50.7%, against 55.2% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than DYNF.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYNF This pageiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | — | −3.6% | −26.0% | −34.7% | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 3 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 3 of 3 | −2.4% | −22.7% | −30.9% | −23.4% | −6.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 2 of 3 | −3.0% | −27.9% | −34.1% | −22.1% | −6.4% | −13.0% | — | — | — | — |
| JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 2 of 3 | −3.2% | −21.8% | −32.9% | −17.1% | −8.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| VTV Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 1 of 3 | −4.0% | −17.0% | −36.4% | −17.3% | −6.5% | −11.6% | −18.8% | −1.1% | −59.2% | — |
| OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 3 of 3 | −2.2% | −21.5% | −32.8% | −18.2% | −6.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1 of 3 | −3.2% | −18.8% | −35.5% | −20.8% | −6.9% | −15.6% | — | — | — | — |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 1 of 3 | −4.1% | −21.6% | −36.0% | −21.3% | −6.2% | −15.2% | — | — | — | — |
| AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 1 of 3 | −5.2% | −22.2% | −37.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 1 of 3 | −3.3% | −27.5% | −34.1% | −20.5% | −6.1% | −11.2% | — | — | — | — |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 2 of 3 | −3.4% | −24.6% | −33.7% | −19.6% | −6.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 3 of 3 | −3.0% | −22.1% | −33.8% | −17.4% | −6.4% | −11.5% | — | — | — | — |
| DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 1 of 3 | −4.5% | −20.8% | −40.5% | −19.6% | −5.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 3 of 3 | −2.2% | −17.0% | −33.0% | −12.7% | −6.2% | −9.5% | — | — | — | — |
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF | 1 of 2 | −3.9% | −24.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | 1 of 3 | −3.5% | −33.7% | −31.8% | −22.3% | −6.2% | −15.2% | −18.3% | −2.0% | −50.7% | — |
| SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 3 of 3 | −2.5% | −25.0% | −31.5% | −20.8% | −6.3% | −8.5% | −15.3% | −3.2% | −57.8% | — |
| VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | 1 of 3 | −4.0% | −25.2% | −35.0% | −20.0% | −6.3% | −14.1% | −19.5% | −1.9% | −55.5% | — |
| SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2 of 3 | −2.1% | −17.3% | −35.9% | −11.5% | −6.3% | −11.3% | −11.7% | — | — | — |
| FLQL Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF | 3 of 3 | −2.7% | −20.9% | −33.6% | −16.4% | −6.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0 of 3 | −7.1% | −26.8% | −40.8% | −25.7% | −5.5% | −21.5% | −27.2% | −2.9% | −58.4% | — |
How closely does DYNF move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares DYNF with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 5 years.
- Only SPMO, MTUM and FLQL had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than DYNF's 1.09, out of 20 popular alternatives with the same record.
- SPMO took just 71% of the S&P 500's losses, against 97% for DYNF, while still keeping 107% of its gains.
- Over the past 5 years, DYNF captured 106% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 97% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.02. Its share of the market's gains was slightly larger than its share of the losses.
Monthly total returns over the past 5 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than DYNF's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYNF This pageiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 106% | 97% | 1.09 | 1.02 |
| SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 107% | 71% | 1.51 | 1.09 |
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 90% | 81% | 1.10 | 1.06 |
| FLQL Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF | 97% | 89% | 1.10 | 0.95 |
| SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 88% | 82% | 1.08 | 0.90 |
| JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 94% | 88% | 1.07 | 0.90 |
| VTV Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 84% | 79% | 1.07 | 0.75 |
| ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 86% | 81% | 1.06 | 0.83 |
| LRGF iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | 100% | 95% | 1.05 | 0.98 |
| AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 99% | 101% | 0.98 | 1.00 |
| QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 86% | 88% | 0.98 | 0.83 |
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF | 100% | 101% | 0.98 | 1.01 |
| GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 97% | 101% | 0.96 | 0.98 |
| QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 97% | 102% | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| VTI Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF | 99% | 104% | 0.95 | 1.01 |
| VUG Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | 112% | 120% | 0.94 | 1.22 |
| USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 65% | 74% | 0.89 | 0.64 |
| OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 87% | 99% | 0.88 | 0.94 |
| DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 83% | 95% | 0.88 | 0.86 |
| SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 51% | 60% | 0.84 | 0.53 |
| IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 97% | 135% | 0.71 | 1.13 |
What diversifies DYNF?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with DYNF's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing DYNF with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in DYNF into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 23% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+16.1% for DYNF alone, +15.3% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, GCOW, MLPX and GLD have moved largely independently of DYNF over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- In 2022, the one year DYNF lost money (-20.3%), DBMF returned +21.6%.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which DYNF lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% DYNF and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +98.5% | 0.87 | −20.3% | 16.2% | +16.1% |
| GCOW InternationalPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 0.47 | +93.4% | 1.04 | +5.5% | 14.6% | +15.8% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.49 | +135% | 0.97 | +21.5% | 15.2% | +17.2% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.12 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | 13.8% | +16.9% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.24 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | 15.1% | +18.1% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.42 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | 14.9% | +16.8% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.29 | +59.7% | 0.82 | +21.6% | 12.5% | +15.3% |
| DBA AlternativesInvesco DB Agriculture Fund | 0.13 | +66.4% | 0.81 | +2.5% | 13.4% | +15.3% |
| IHE Broad MarketiShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.48 | +81.2% | 0.80 | −4.9% | 14.6% | +15.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (this page) | 1.00 | +98.5% | 0.87 | −20.3% | 16.2% | +16.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.28 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | 15.3% | +20.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.15 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | 14.6% | +20.2% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.23 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | 15.8% | +22.9% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.31 | +1,008% | 1.34 | +87.5% | 18.3% | +26.0% |
| CRS SteelCarpenter Technology Corporation | 0.40 | +1,082% | 1.30 | +29.5% | 19.2% | +26.6% |
Common questions
What was DYNF's worst drawdown?
DYNF's deepest decline since it began trading in 2019 was 34.7%, from February to March 2020. It took six months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because DYNF launched in March 2019, that record does not include the dot-com bust, the 2008 financial crisis or five other sell-offs.
What were DYNF's best and worst years?
Over six full calendar years, DYNF's best year was 2023, when it returned 36.2%. Its worst was 2022, with a return of -20.3%.
Is there a better investment than DYNF?
Among DYNF's popular alternatives, SPMO was ahead of DYNF in most short and long periods. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, PVAL (US large-cap value) earned more than DYNF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 16.1% a year at 15.1% volatility, against 14.7% a year at 17.5%.
Is DYNF more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. DYNF's volatility over the past 5 years was 17.5%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, DYNF's return lands within 17.5% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is DYNF's Sharpe ratio?
DYNF's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.87, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so DYNF earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is DYNF with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, DYNF's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.99 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They move almost in lockstep, so holding both adds little diversification. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against DYNF instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a DYNF holding.
What are the best alternatives to DYNF?
Of the 22 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed DYNF in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 2 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: SPMO.
Did DYNF outperform the S&P 500?
DYNF finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of six full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +20.0%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did DYNF do in stock market crashes?
DYNF fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the three major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the 2022 bear market, when DYNF fell 26.0% and the S&P 500 fell 24.5%.
What diversifies DYNF?
These had a low correlation with DYNF over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, GCOW (correlation 0.47), MLPX (correlation 0.49) and GLD (correlation 0.12); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.28), MCK (correlation 0.15) and MPC (correlation 0.23). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than DYNF's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of DYNF's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 2 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to DYNF
VTVVanguard Morningstar Value ETF
QUALiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
VUGVanguard Morningstar Growth ETF
VTIVanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
IWMiShares Russell 2000 ETF