Relative Intelligence · Oil & Gas Midstream

How Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on EPD alone. It places EPD (Enterprise Products Partners L.P.) against 18 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where EPD stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: EPD's full trading record, from July 1998 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, EPD fell 3.2% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its oil & gas midstream peers split over the past 3 months: TRGP (Targa Resources) rose 4.1%, while ENB (Enbridge) fell 12.9%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?EPD fell 3.2% over the past 3 months, in line with the oil & gas midstream ETF AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF), which fell 1.6%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its oil & gas midstream peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: TRGP (Targa Resources) rose 4.1%, while ENB (Enbridge) fell 12.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsEPD has outpaced the market, rising 28.4% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termEPD turned $10,000 into $27,800 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: EPD rose 113% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashIn the Covid crash, EPD fell 53.2%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than ENB (Enbridge, 43.4%) but less than WMB (Williams Companies, 57.0%). EPD fell further than the S&P 500 in two of the last three sell-offs, including the Covid crash (53.2% against 33.7%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationEPD moves far less with the S&P 500 than it used to, with a correlation of 0.42 over the past 5 years against 0.73 in the 5 years before. EPD is some diversification, but not a hedge: a correlation of 0.42 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.43 with the total US market, more closely than 56% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- MPLX earned more than EPD over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 23.5% a year at 18.8% volatility, against 16.4% a year at 17.1%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CVX (Chevron, integrated oil & gas) and SHEL (Shell, integrated oil & gas) were ahead of EPD in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (25.2% and 24.8% volatility against 17.1%).
- Whole market
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than EPD with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How much would $10,000 in EPD have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in EPD over the past 28 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of EPD over the same span and EPD's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in EPD at the end of September 1998 would have grown to $513,562 by September 2026, more than the $121,630 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of EPD, and AAPL finished highest, at $11,681,338.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1998 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 133 of the 1,106 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of EPD; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$12M+116,713% total · +28.7% a year
- AMZN$3M+26,684% total · +22.1% a year
- TSM$2M+23,057% total · +21.5% a year
- VLO$2M+16,534% total · +20.0% a year
- LNG$2M+16,009% total · +19.9% a year
- EPD$513,562+5,036% total · +15.1% a year
- OKE$422,121+4,121% total · +14.3% a year
- WMB$377,615+3,676% total · +13.8% a year
- TRP$197,872+1,879% total · +11.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$121,630+1,116% total · +9.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 580 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of EPD; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- VLO$64,131+541% total · +45.0% a year
- NGL$62,196+522% total · +44.1% a year
- TRGP$61,030+510% total · +43.6% a year
- PAGP$34,579+246% total · +28.2% a year
- PAA$34,327+243% total · +28.0% a year
- MPLX$30,642+206% total · +25.1% a year
- LNG$28,953+190% total · +23.7% a year
- KMI$23,609+136% total · +18.7% a year
- EPD$23,444+134% total · +18.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
EPD at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- EPD's deepest decline since it began trading in 1998 was 58.8%, from September 2014 to March 2020. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 27 full calendar years, EPD's best was 2000, when it returned 86.1%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 30.1%. It lost money in six of those years.
- EPD is 6.0% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $80B
- Industry
- Oil & Gas Midstream
- Price history from
- July 1998
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +28.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +65.2%+18.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +113%+16.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +178%+10.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +86.1%2000
- Worst calendar year
- −30.1%2008
- Losing years
- 6 of 27full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 17.1%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.98return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −58.8%Sep 2014 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- −6.0%below the peak
EPD against the whole market
Where EPD ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does EPD rank among all stocks?
This section ranks EPD on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how EPD stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- EPD is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 1% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | EPD | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +28.4% | 1,015 of 3,287 | top 31% |
| 3-year return | +65.2% | 1,328 of 3,017 | top 44% |
| 5-year return | +113% | 613 of 2,893 | top 21% |
| 10-year return | +178% | 959 of 2,202 | top 44% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 17.1% | 35 of 2,893 | top 1% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.98 | 111 of 2,893 | top 4% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −58.1% | 810 of 2,187 | top 37% |
What has beaten EPD on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). EPD sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than EPD with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- None of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than EPD over the past 5 years with less volatility: nothing sits in the green region.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to EPD. 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- 3 with more than 1.6× EPD's volatility are in the table only
Is there a better investment than EPD?
Investments that beat EPD over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among EPD's popular alternatives, MPLX earned more than EPD over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 23.5% a year at 18.8% volatility, against 16.4% a year at 17.1%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CVX (integrated oil & gas) and SHEL (integrated oil & gas) were ahead of EPD in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (25.2% and 24.8% volatility against 17.1%).
- Nothing in the whole market did better on both counts: none of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than EPD with less volatility over the past 5 years.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat EPD over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks EPD's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than EPD's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× EPD's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than EPD's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with EPD?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.42 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against EPD. 9 of 18 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.85 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.61 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +41.8% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | +829% | 0.78 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.72 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | 0.55 | — | ||
PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Higher return in most periods | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.79 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 3 shownEverything else in Oil & Gas Midstream and Oil & Gas and the categories next to it (Exploration & Production, Integrated Oil & Gas, Oilfield Services), plus EPD's specific themes. 3 of 74 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.70 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.49 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 204 of 3,541 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.60 | 0.40% | |
| On the frontierHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.31 | — | ||
SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.51 | 0.80% | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.00 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.32 | 0.48% | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.49 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.27 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.34 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for EPD
- Annual return
- EPD returned 16.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $21,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- EPD's volatility over the past 5 years was 17.1%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, EPD's return lands within 17.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- EPD's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.98, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so EPD earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- EPD's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 58.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 58.1% fall takes a 138% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, EPD's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.42 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against EPD instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a EPD holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
EPD against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against EPD, compared period by period and year by year.
How do EPD's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at EPD, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 18 popular alternatives earned more than EPD over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, EPD returned 16.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with lower volatility (17.1% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than EPD with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | +44.2% | 36.9% |
| TRGP Targa Resources Corp. | +41.8% | 31.7% |
| NGL NGL Energy Partners LP | +40.6% | 57.1% |
| PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | +27.0% | 25.6% |
| PAGP Plains GP Holdings LP | +26.8% | 26.1% |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | +24.6% | 24.0% |
| DTM DT Midstream, Inc. | +24.5% | 25.2% |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | +23.5% | 18.8% |
| WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | +23.5% | 27.6% |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | +23.4% | 30.2% |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | +18.7% | 22.5% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | +16.6% | 32.3% |
| EPD This pageEnterprise Products Partners L.P. | +16.4% | 17.1% |
| OKE ONEOK, Inc. | +13.3% | 28.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| HESM Hess Midstream LP | +10.9% | 27.0% |
| TRP TC Energy Corporation | +10.8% | 21.9% |
| GEL Genesis Energy, L.P. | +10.6% | 39.4% |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | +9.1% | 18.9% |
| DOW Dow Inc. | −7.6% | 34.1% |
Has EPD consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares EPD with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than EPD helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Eight of the 18 popular alternatives, led by VLO, TRGP and LNG, outperformed EPD in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- VLO, TRGP and LNG outperformed EPD in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- DTM earned more for the risk it took than EPD (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in its worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than EPD over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (this page) | — | −3.9% | −3.2% | +3.2% | +20.3% | +28.4% | +65.2% | +113% | +178% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | — | $80B | — |
| VLO QualifiedValero Energy Corporation | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +10.2% | +38.9% | +93.2% | +166% | +176% | +259% | +524% | +1,061% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | — | $125B | — |
| TRGP QualifiedTarga Resources Corp. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +1.1% | +4.1% | +27.6% | +59.0% | +98.1% | +260% | +473% | +829% | 31.7% | 1.27 | −90.8% | — | $63B | — |
| LNG QualifiedCheniere Energy, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +3.0% | +7.2% | +12.8% | +44.3% | +29.3% | +69.8% | +186% | +616% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | — | $59B | — |
| MPLX QualifiedMPLX Lp | 3/5 short3/3 long | −1.2% | +4.1% | +8.8% | +14.7% | +27.2% | +105% | +187% | +350% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | — | $59B | — |
| PAA QualifiedPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +2.0% | +6.7% | +26.0% | +48.2% | +70.2% | +105% | +230% | +64.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | — | $18B | — |
| PAGP QualifiedPlains GP Holdings LP | 5/5 short2/3 long | +0.7% | +7.8% | +25.3% | +49.6% | +73.6% | +113% | +228% | +56.3% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | — | $5.4B | — |
| KMI QualifiedKinder Morgan, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | +5.8% | +4.0% | +7.1% | +24.6% | +26.9% | +129% | +136% | +163% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | — | $75B | — |
| NGL QualifiedNGL Energy Partners LP | 4/5 short2/3 long | −4.9% | +0.5% | +12.3% | +56.4% | +146% | +270% | +449% | +37.4% | 57.1% | 0.88 | −93.2% | — | $1.9B | — |
| WMB Oil & Gas MidstreamThe Williams Companies, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −1.8% | −4.5% | +0.6% | +18.1% | +14.9% | +125% | +200% | +288% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | — | $86B | — |
| WES Oil & Gas MidstreamWestern Midstream Partners, LP | 2/5 short2/3 long | −4.4% | −2.6% | +14.1% | +19.4% | +27.6% | +110% | +187% | +128% | 27.6% | 0.91 | −91.9% | — | $18B | — |
| DTM Oil & Gas MidstreamDT Midstream, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −2.1% | −14.2% | −6.1% | +3.2% | +14.4% | +147% | +199% | — | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | $12B | — |
| OKE Oil & Gas MidstreamONEOK, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +1.1% | +0.4% | +13.5% | +29.6% | +42.8% | +59.9% | +86.8% | +233% | 28.0% | 0.59 | −80.2% | — | $59B | — |
| TRP Oil & Gas MidstreamTC Energy Corporation | 1/5 short1/3 long | +3.3% | −8.8% | +3.6% | +13.8% | +24.9% | +136% | +66.7% | +160% | 21.9% | 0.58 | −41.6% | — | $64B | — |
| ENB Oil & Gas MidstreamEnbridge Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −0.6% | −12.9% | −4.6% | +5.0% | +8.5% | +84.0% | +54.3% | +103% | 18.9% | 0.56 | −44.1% | — | $107B | — |
| EOG Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionEOG Resources, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +12.4% | +12.7% | +24.0% | +51.9% | +53.1% | +31.9% | +115% | +131% | 32.3% | 0.64 | −77.1% | — | $83B | — |
| DOW ChemicalsDow Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +8.6% | +2.2% | −14.7% | +30.8% | +48.8% | −25.6% | −32.7% | — | 34.1% | -0.06 | −64.4% | — | $22B | — |
| GEL Oil & Gas MidstreamGenesis Energy, L.P. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −6.2% | −2.8% | −13.4% | −8.1% | −4.9% | +44.2% | +65.5% | −21.8% | 39.4% | 0.45 | −89.3% | — | $1.7B | — |
| HESM Oil & Gas MidstreamHess Midstream LP | 0/5 short0/3 long | −22.5% | −22.2% | −13.6% | −5.8% | +0.8% | +27.1% | +67.9% | — | 27.0% | 0.52 | −75.2% | — | $6.3B | — |
How did EPD do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1999, along with where EPD ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with EPD and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- EPD finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 16 of its 27 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, MPLX came out ahead of EPD most often, in nine of the 13 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, EPD finished in the top quarter in six of 27 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 12 of 19.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of EPD; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places EPD among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of EPD | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPD This pageEnterprise Products Partners L.P. | — | +9.4% | +28.0% | +17.7% | +18.3% | +21.4% | −23.6% | +21.9% | −1.4% | +4.3% | +12.5% | −25.5% | +13.3% | +38.5% | +12.0% | +17.7% | +41.3% | +64.3% | −30.1% | +17.3% | +29.3% | −1.3% | +12.6% | +35.7% | −11.8% | +59.7% | +86.1% | +36.8% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 27 | 12 of 19 | 9 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 13 of 19 | 16 of 18 | 9 of 18 | 10 of 17 | 4 of 17 | 6 of 16 | 12 of 16 | 4 of 16 | 8 of 16 | 9 of 15 | 12 of 13 | 8 of 11 | 3 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 10 of 10 | 7 of 10 | 9 of 10 | 1 of 10 | 4 of 10 | 1 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 27 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 12 of 27 | +37.0% | −2.9% | +5.9% | +75.0% | +40.3% | −35.7% | +30.3% | −15.7% | +40.0% | +0.7% | +46.8% | +0.3% | +65.0% | +66.3% | −7.8% | +39.6% | −20.3% | −68.5% | +37.9% | −0.4% | +128% | +97.9% | +26.6% | −2.1% | +3.6% | +88.6% | −4.8% |
| TRGP Targa Resources Corp. | 10 of 15 | +5.7% | +110% | +21.0% | +43.7% | +100% | −32.5% | +24.0% | −19.9% | −7.1% | +131% | −73.4% | +23.2% | +72.0% | +34.2% | +56.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 14 of 27 | −8.7% | +27.2% | +15.0% | +49.3% | +69.5% | −1.7% | +3.2% | +9.9% | +29.9% | +11.2% | −47.1% | +63.3% | +130% | +116% | +57.5% | +128% | −15.1% | −91.3% | +13.0% | −22.4% | +16.9% | +444% | +815% | +28.0% | −58.6% | −16.1% | −27.9% |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | 9 of 13 | +20.6% | +41.7% | +22.5% | +21.1% | +54.0% | −1.8% | −8.2% | −8.4% | +8.9% | −6.3% | −44.8% | +69.0% | +46.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | 14 of 27 | +14.3% | +21.4% | +39.2% | +35.9% | +22.4% | −50.8% | −2.4% | +2.3% | −31.3% | +55.6% | −51.9% | +3.9% | +19.5% | +29.4% | +24.4% | +26.5% | +65.4% | −28.1% | +7.8% | +37.8% | +11.4% | +24.6% | +44.0% | +2.2% | +47.7% | +62.1% | −16.8% |
| PAGP Plains GP Holdings LP | 5 of 12 | +12.7% | +23.6% | +38.2% | +31.7% | +28.8% | −51.2% | +0.4% | −3.5% | −32.1% | +50.5% | −61.7% | −1.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 7 of 14 | +4.7% | +64.4% | +4.2% | +21.2% | +23.8% | −30.8% | +44.4% | −11.1% | −11.1% | +42.7% | −62.8% | +23.2% | +6.3% | +13.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NGL NGL Energy Partners LP | 6 of 14 | +100% | −10.4% | +360% | −33.5% | −24.2% | −75.3% | +34.0% | −22.2% | −25.6% | +116% | −56.5% | −13.8% | +58.6% | +23.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 13 of 27 | +14.9% | +62.4% | +11.8% | +32.9% | +38.4% | −8.2% | +14.2% | −23.9% | +2.0% | +31.2% | −39.2% | +21.3% | +22.8% | +29.9% | +37.3% | +20.2% | +49.6% | −58.8% | +38.8% | +14.3% | +49.2% | +106% | +457% | −75.2% | −31.0% | +32.3% | −0.5% |
| WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 8 of 13 | +12.8% | +43.6% | +19.5% | +29.2% | +72.2% | −19.2% | −22.7% | −20.3% | −8.0% | +22.3% | −38.1% | +55.5% | +34.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DTM DT Midstream, Inc. | 3 of 4 | +24.1% | +89.0% | +4.7% | +20.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OKE ONEOK, Inc. | 12 of 27 | −22.9% | +50.1% | +13.2% | +18.9% | +64.7% | −43.5% | +47.8% | +6.3% | −2.1% | +150% | −47.4% | −5.3% | +49.6% | +1.5% | +61.2% | +29.3% | +61.2% | −32.4% | +6.9% | +67.9% | −2.8% | +33.5% | +19.0% | +11.7% | −23.6% | +100% | −27.7% |
| TRP TC Energy Corporation | 13 of 27 | +24.0% | +39.9% | +6.1% | −8.8% | +21.7% | −18.7% | +57.0% | −22.2% | +12.9% | +46.1% | −29.0% | +12.3% | +1.0% | +13.2% | +20.0% | +16.2% | +34.2% | −30.6% | +21.9% | +16.2% | +32.9% | +21.2% | +55.8% | +21.9% | +14.8% | +41.4% | −36.3% |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | 14 of 27 | +19.5% | +26.3% | −1.1% | +6.5% | +30.9% | −13.6% | +36.0% | −15.5% | −3.7% | +32.4% | −33.3% | +21.0% | +3.7% | +19.2% | +37.0% | +26.2% | +47.3% | −17.0% | +21.4% | +13.5% | +29.5% | +24.8% | +57.5% | +3.1% | −1.3% | +48.7% | −8.9% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 13 of 27 | −11.4% | +4.3% | −2.0% | +56.9% | +88.6% | −38.6% | −2.8% | −18.7% | +7.5% | +44.0% | −22.5% | +10.3% | +39.7% | +23.4% | +8.5% | −5.5% | +47.4% | −25.0% | +43.6% | −14.6% | +106% | +55.3% | +16.1% | +2.5% | −28.1% | +212% | +2.5% |
| DOW Dow Inc. | 1 of 6 | −37.4% | −22.8% | +14.7% | −6.6% | +6.8% | +7.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GEL Genesis Energy, L.P. | 14 of 27 | +61.8% | −8.4% | +19.9% | +1.1% | +85.2% | −66.2% | +22.6% | −9.2% | −32.3% | +6.3% | −8.4% | −15.8% | +53.7% | +35.2% | +13.0% | +49.8% | +140% | −60.3% | +24.9% | +76.2% | −2.0% | +35.8% | +108% | +28.6% | +24.4% | −38.6% | −35.7% |
| HESM Hess Midstream LP | 3 of 8 | +0.5% | +26.4% | +14.3% | +16.6% | +53.0% | −5.2% | +43.9% | −8.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How EPD has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were EPD's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents EPD's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1998, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of EPD's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: EPD fell 58.8% from September 2014 to March 2020, while the S&P 500 rose 32.7%.
- The slowest recovery came after EPD fell 58.8% from September 2014 to March 2020; it did not regain that peak until March 2022, two years later.
Green means EPD fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | EPD fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −58.8% | +32.7% | Sep 2014 | Mar 2020 | 5.5 years | Mar 2022 | 2 years |
| 2008 financial crisis | −44.4% | −42.4% | May 2008 | Nov 2008 | 6 months | Sep 2009 | 10 months |
| Dot-com bust | −34.6% | −10.8% | Feb 2002 | Jun 2002 | 4 months | May 2003 | 11 months |
| No named crash | −33.3% | +6.0% | Jul 1998 | Dec 1998 | 5 months | Aug 1999 | 8 months |
| 2022 bear market | −18.0% | −11.6% | Jun 2022 | Sep 2022 | 3 months | Apr 2023 | 7 months |
How did EPD do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far EPD, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- EPD fell less than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when EPD fell 34.6% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, ENB held up best, falling less than EPD in six of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than EPD.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPD This pageEnterprise Products Partners L.P. | — | −2.4% | −18.0% | −53.2% | −18.6% | −4.1% | −31.3% | −13.0% | 0.0% | −44.4% | −34.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 2 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 1 of 10 | −3.5% | −31.9% | −61.3% | −42.0% | −6.9% | −24.2% | −35.6% | −4.3% | −80.7% | −54.1% |
| TRGP Targa Resources Corp. | 0 of 7 | −5.6% | −30.0% | −88.0% | −40.6% | −5.1% | −79.1% | −22.8% | — | — | — |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −1.3% | −17.8% | −46.1% | −21.3% | −5.1% | −66.5% | −62.4% | 0.0% | −97.7% | −84.4% |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | 2 of 6 | −1.2% | −18.4% | −64.6% | −17.9% | −4.5% | −66.8% | — | — | — | — |
| PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | 3 of 10 | −6.4% | −19.9% | −79.8% | −22.3% | −2.0% | −55.5% | −10.1% | 0.0% | −49.3% | −23.1% |
| PAGP Plains GP Holdings LP | 1 of 6 | −6.4% | −22.3% | −79.3% | −20.6% | −1.8% | −72.9% | — | — | — | — |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 0 of 7 | −3.2% | −20.3% | −55.1% | −19.8% | −4.0% | −64.4% | −16.2% | — | — | — |
| NGL NGL Energy Partners LP | 1 of 7 | −12.5% | −53.7% | −84.2% | −24.0% | −18.1% | −77.1% | −9.8% | — | — | — |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −3.4% | −23.0% | −57.0% | −25.4% | −7.0% | −78.9% | −26.7% | −3.4% | −75.3% | −98.0% |
| WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 1 of 6 | −2.5% | −23.5% | −77.4% | −17.6% | −6.5% | −63.0% | — | — | — | — |
| DTM DT Midstream, Inc. | 0 of 2 | −3.7% | −19.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OKE ONEOK, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −5.1% | −29.2% | −80.2% | −25.5% | −5.9% | −51.3% | −21.0% | −0.8% | −63.1% | −42.0% |
| TRP TC Energy Corporation | 4 of 10 | −4.0% | −30.7% | −41.6% | −15.3% | −5.2% | −18.5% | −12.8% | −0.6% | −45.4% | −13.7% |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | 6 of 10 | −1.5% | −23.9% | −43.4% | −13.8% | −3.2% | −34.6% | −13.2% | 0.0% | −40.9% | −21.0% |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −7.4% | −33.4% | −61.5% | −37.3% | −11.3% | −31.7% | −35.8% | −1.5% | −68.0% | −52.7% |
| DOW Dow Inc. | 0 of 3 | −6.9% | −37.1% | −54.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GEL Genesis Energy, L.P. | 0 of 10 | −2.3% | −38.8% | −80.1% | −27.5% | −9.0% | −52.3% | −18.0% | 0.0% | −70.1% | −72.7% |
| HESM Hess Midstream LP | 0 of 5 | −3.9% | −28.7% | −70.8% | −28.9% | −8.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does EPD move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares EPD with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- LNG took just 30% of the S&P 500's losses, against 94% for EPD, while still keeping 79% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, EPD captured 81% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 94% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.93. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
- Six of the 15 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than EPD's 0.86, led by LNG, VLO and MPLX.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than EPD's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPD This pageEnterprise Products Partners L.P. | 81% | 94% | 0.86 | 0.93 |
| LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 79% | 30% | 2.65 | 0.77 |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 142% | 114% | 1.24 | 1.31 |
| MPLX MPLX Lp | 87% | 76% | 1.14 | 1.16 |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 85% | 78% | 1.08 | 1.02 |
| TRGP Targa Resources Corp. | 156% | 157% | 0.99 | 1.85 |
| TRP TC Energy Corporation | 67% | 73% | 0.92 | 0.72 |
| KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 68% | 82% | 0.83 | 0.82 |
| OKE ONEOK, Inc. | 103% | 126% | 0.82 | 1.38 |
| ENB Enbridge Inc. | 60% | 74% | 0.82 | 0.73 |
| WES Western Midstream Partners, LP | 121% | 175% | 0.69 | 2.23 |
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. | 92% | 135% | 0.69 | 1.17 |
| PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. | 81% | 127% | 0.64 | 1.36 |
| PAGP Plains GP Holdings LP | 77% | 123% | 0.63 | 1.29 |
| NGL NGL Energy Partners LP | 111% | 193% | 0.57 | 1.73 |
| GEL Genesis Energy, L.P. | 81% | 176% | 0.46 | 1.65 |
What diversifies EPD?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with EPD's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing EPD with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in EPD into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+18.6% for EPD alone, +19.1% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and DBEF have moved largely independently of EPD over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.44 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in four of the six calendar years in which EPD lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which EPD lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% EPD and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 2018 | 2015 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (this page) | 1.00 | +113% | 0.98 | −23.6% | −1.4% | −25.5% | −30.1% | −1.3% | −11.8% | 18.9% | +18.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.32 | +225% | 1.34 | +3.9% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −20.8% | — | — | 16.1% | +20.5% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.08 | +323% | 0.97 | +55.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | −44.7% | +10.8% | −47.0% | 17.1% | +23.5% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.44 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +2.1% | −9.5% | +4.1% | — | — | — | 16.2% | +17.8% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.05 | +126% | 0.96 | +24.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +4.9% | +17.8% | — | 15.7% | +19.1% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.25 | +136% | 0.93 | +28.2% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | 16.6% | +19.7% |
| VLUE Broad MarketiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 0.42 | +109% | 0.90 | −0.2% | −11.1% | −4.1% | — | — | — | 17.2% | +18.8% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.07 | +153% | 0.89 | +31.5% | −9.9% | −12.9% | −45.3% | +4.7% | −24.4% | 16.3% | +20.0% |
| EUFN InternationaliShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 0.33 | +133% | 0.89 | −8.5% | −23.1% | −4.7% | — | — | — | 16.9% | +19.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2020 | 2018 | 2015 | 2008 | 2005 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (this page) | 1.00 | +113% | 0.98 | −23.6% | −1.4% | −25.5% | −30.1% | −1.3% | −11.8% | 18.9% | +18.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.31 | +479% | 1.55 | +10.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | −39.6% | +18.7% | −8.3% | 17.5% | +22.9% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.20 | +3,143% | 1.47 | −2.4% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −20.5% | −25.2% | −65.1% | 20.9% | +36.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.29 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +6.7% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −15.2% | +20.1% | −9.4% | 19.7% | +32.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.49 | +413% | 1.44 | +27.1% | −28.4% | −4.5% | −40.4% | +64.9% | −27.2% | 18.1% | +22.1% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.41 | +594% | 1.36 | −7.2% | −37.5% | −36.3% | −67.4% | −1.8% | −33.1% | 19.1% | +25.1% |
Common questions
What was EPD's worst drawdown?
EPD's deepest decline since it began trading in 1998 was 58.8%, from September 2014 to March 2020. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were EPD's best and worst years?
Over 27 full calendar years, EPD's best year was 2000, when it returned 86.1%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -30.1%.
Is there a better investment than EPD?
Among EPD's popular alternatives, MPLX earned more than EPD over the past 5 years with similar volatility: 23.5% a year at 18.8% volatility, against 16.4% a year at 17.1%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CVX (integrated oil & gas) and SHEL (integrated oil & gas) were ahead of EPD in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (25.2% and 24.8% volatility against 17.1%).
Is EPD more volatile than the S&P 500?
No. EPD's volatility over the past 5 years was 17.1%, 1.0 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, EPD's return lands within 17.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is EPD's Sharpe ratio?
EPD's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.98, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so EPD earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is EPD with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, EPD's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.42 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against EPD instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a EPD holding.
What are the best alternatives to EPD?
Of the 18 popular alternatives we compared, eight outperformed EPD in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: VLO, TRGP and LNG.
Did EPD outperform the S&P 500?
EPD finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 16 of 27 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +9.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did EPD do in stock market crashes?
EPD fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in eight of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in two. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when EPD fell 34.6% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies EPD?
These had a low correlation with EPD over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.32), SMH (correlation 0.08) and DBEF (correlation 0.44); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.31), CLS (correlation 0.20) and FIX (correlation 0.29). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than EPD's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of EPD's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to EPD
VLOValero Energy
TRGPTarga Resources
LNGCheniere Energy
MPLXMPLX
KMIKinder Morgan
WMBWilliams Companies
OKEONEOK
TRPTC Energy
ENBEnbridge
EOGEOG Resources