Relative Intelligence · Exploration & Production

How EOG Resources (EOG) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on EOG alone. It places EOG (EOG Resources, Inc.) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where EOG stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: EOG's full trading record, from October 1989 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, EOG rose 24.0% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its exploration & production peers were far apart over the past 6 months, from OVV (Ovintiv, up 32.8%) to FANG (Diamondback Energy, up 11.6%). Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?Not a move of its own: the exploration & production ETF XOP (State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) rose 18.1% over the past 3 months, with COP (ConocoPhillips, up 27.0%) and OXY (Occidental Petroleum, up 14.5%), against 3.9% for the S&P 500. Last month cut against the tape: EOG rose 12.4% while the S&P 500 fell 0.6%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsEOG has run far ahead of the market, rising 53.1% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. That said, the last two calendar years both went the same way: EOG fell 11.4% in 2025, against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termEOG turned $10,000 into $23,100 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. That said, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: EOG rose 115% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, EOG has typically fallen 1.7 times as far as the S&P 500. In the Covid crash, EOG fell 61.5%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than REPX (Riley Exploration Permian, 33.4%) but less than OXY (Occidental Petroleum, 76.8%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, EOG has a correlation of 0.19 over 5 years, less closely than 87% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is a real diversifier. EOG's link to the S&P 500 has loosened: a correlation of 0.19 over the past 5 years, down from 0.69 in the 5 years before. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- XOM (Exxonmobil) and WMB (Williams Companies) earned more than EOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. XOM returned 27.1% a year at 26.5% volatility, against 16.6% a year at 32.3%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CVX (Chevron, integrated oil & gas) and E (Eni S.p.A., integrated oil & gas) earned more than EOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. CVX returned 19.5% a year at 25.2% volatility, against 16.6% a year at 32.3%.
- Whole market
- 140 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than EOG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), WMT (Walmart) and XOM (Exxonmobil).
How much would $10,000 in EOG have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in EOG over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of EOG over the same span and EOG's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in EOG at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $380,118 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of EOG, and VLO finished highest, at $1,019,941.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 152 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of EOG; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- VLO$1M+10,099% total · +17.3% a year
- AMGN$526,909+5,169% total · +14.6% a year
- WMB$472,016+4,620% total · +14.2% a year
- RY$442,765+4,328% total · +14.0% a year
- LLY$396,376+3,864% total · +13.5% a year
- EOG$380,118+3,701% total · +13.4% a year
- COP$156,444+1,464% total · +9.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- XOM$124,235+1,142% total · +9.1% a year
- REPX$382−96.2% total · −10.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 671 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of EOG; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- VLO$64,131+541% total · +45.0% a year
- PR$36,604+266% total · +29.6% a year
- XOM$32,965+230% total · +26.9% a year
- WMB$32,631+226% total · +26.7% a year
- FANG$23,999+140% total · +19.1% a year
- COP$22,182+122% total · +17.3% a year
- REPX$21,791+118% total · +16.9% a year
- EOG$21,734+117% total · +16.8% a year
- OVV$19,897+99.0% total · +14.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
EOG at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- EOG's deepest decline since it began trading in 1989 was 77.1%, from October 2018 to March 2020. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- EOG is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, EOG's best was 2000, when it returned 212%, and its worst was 2020, when it lost 38.6%. It lost money in 12 of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $83B
- Industry
- Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
- Price history from
- October 1989
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +53.1%total return
- Past 3 years
- +31.9%+9.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +115%+16.6% a year
- Past 10 years
- +131%+8.7% a year
- Best calendar year
- +212%2000
- Worst calendar year
- −38.6%2020
- Losing years
- 12 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 32.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.64return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −77.1%Oct 2018 to Mar 2020
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
EOG against the whole market
Where EOG ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does EOG rank among all stocks?
This section ranks EOG on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how EOG stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- EOG's 1-year return ranks in the top 15% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | EOG | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +53.1% | 508 of 3,287 | top 15% |
| 3-year return | +31.9% | 1,824 of 3,017 | bottom 41% |
| 5-year return | +115% | 604 of 2,893 | top 21% |
| 10-year return | +131% | 1,176 of 2,202 | bottom 48% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 32.3% | 937 of 2,893 | top 32% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.64 | 591 of 2,893 | top 20% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −77.1% | 1,534 of 2,187 | bottom 31% |
What has beaten EOG on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). EOG sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than EOG with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 99 stocks and 41 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than EOG over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 4% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half EOG's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 23% less than EOG's 32.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.64 for EOG.
- Among EOG's popular alternatives, XOM and WMB are in the region. XOM earned 27.1% a year against 16.6% a year for EOG, at 26.5% volatility, 18% less than EOG's 32.3%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to EOG; faint dots are 89 more of the 140 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× EOG's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than EOG?
Investments that beat EOG over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among EOG's popular alternatives, XOM and WMB earned more than EOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. XOM returned 27.1% a year at 26.5% volatility, against 16.6% a year at 32.3%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CVX (integrated oil & gas) and E (integrated oil & gas) earned more than EOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. CVX returned 19.5% a year at 25.2% volatility, against 16.6% a year at 32.3%.
- Across the whole market, 140 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than EOG with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, WMT and XOM.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat EOG over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks EOG's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than EOG follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than EOG's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× EOG's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than EOG's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with EOG?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +16.6% | 32.3% | 0.64 | −77.1% | +131% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.19 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against EOG. 6 of 18 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.79 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.57 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +44.2% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | +1,061% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +18.2% | 32.6% | 0.68 | −70.7% | +379% | 0.90 | — | ||
PRPermian Resources Corporation · Exploration & Production | Higher return in most periods | +33.1% | 47.1% | 0.85 | −98.9% | +99.2% | 0.74 | — | |
REPXRiley Exploration Permian, Inc. · Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Higher return in most periods | +18.4% | 57.5% | 0.58 | −72.4% | +403% | 0.68 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Exploration & Production and Oil & Gas and the categories next to it (Oilfield Services, Oil & Gas Midstream, Integrated Oil & Gas), plus EOG's specific themes. 35 of 69 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.76 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +33.2% | 32.9% | 1.04 | −64.2% | +430% | 0.71 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.77 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | 0.71 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.64 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.67 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 899 of 3,546 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.12 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | 0.89 | 0.08% | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.10 | — | ||
NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.07 | — | |
IXCiShares Global Energy ETF · International | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.7% | 23.2% | 0.93 | −64.2% | +183% | 0.89 | 0.37% | |
| On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.23 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for EOG
- Annual return
- EOG returned 16.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $21,500. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- EOG's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.3%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, EOG's return lands within 32.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- EOG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.64, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so EOG earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- EOG's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 77.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 77.1% fall takes a 337% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, EOG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.19 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against EOG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a EOG holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 140 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than EOG with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with EOG | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.12 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.10 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.31 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +22.6% | 25.5% | 0.93 | −66.8% | +189% | 0.89 | 0.08% | |
| 5 | Same or nearby category | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.76 | — | |
| 6 | Popular alternative | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.79 | — | |
| 7 | NEUNewMarket Corporation · Specialty Chemicals | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −40.7% | +165% | 0.07 | — |
| 8 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.00 | — |
| 9 | IXCiShares Global Energy ETF · International | Whole market | +20.7% | 23.2% | 0.93 | −64.2% | +183% | 0.89 | 0.37% |
| 10 | BWFGBankwell Financial Group, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +20.1% | 28.5% | 0.79 | −64.7% | +240% | 0.25 | — |
| 11 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.10 | — | |
| 12 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.11 | 0.48% |
| 13 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.33 | — | |
| 14 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | -0.04 | 0.59% |
| 15 | Same or nearby category | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.77 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.27 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.23 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.25 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | -0.01 | 0.40% | |
| 20 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | -0.05 | 0.19% |
| 21 | Whole market | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.20 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.23 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.41 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.43 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.32 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.32 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.19 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.52 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.30 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.15 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +17.9% | 26.1% | 0.76 | −37.9% | +314% | 0.44 | — | |
| 32 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.14 | — |
| 33 | ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 24.5% | 0.87 | −53.8% | +309% | 0.38 | — |
| 34 | IRMIron Mountain Incorporated · Specialty REITs | Whole market | +24.6% | 30.3% | 0.88 | −39.0% | +470% | 0.18 | — |
| 35 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.41 | — |
| 36 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.06 | — | |
| 37 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.30 | — |
| 38 | CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +30.8% | 28.7% | 1.08 | −48.7% | +512% | 0.15 | — |
| 39 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.64 | 0.61% |
| 40 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.25 | — |
| 41 | BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Whole market | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +180% | 0.20 | — |
| 42 | HUBBHubbell Incorporated · Electrical Equipment | Whole market | +21.0% | 30.0% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +442% | -0.08 | — |
| 43 | SNXTD Synnex Corp · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +20.3% | 30.4% | 0.76 | −55.8% | +430% | 0.14 | — |
| 44 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | 0.24 | — |
| 45 | RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 27.8% | 0.80 | −40.7% | +215% | 0.04 | — |
| 46 | Same or nearby category | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | 0.71 | — | |
| 47 | ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings, Inc. · Auto Parts | Whole market | +27.3% | 29.9% | 0.96 | −48.7% | +367% | 0.25 | — |
| 48 | EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.8% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +340% | 0.16 | — |
| 49 | ENSGThe Ensign Group, Inc. · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +19.8% | 26.8% | 0.81 | −55.5% | +896% | 0.30 | — |
| 50 | AIRRFirst Trust RBA American Industrial RenaissanceTM ETF · US Industrials | Whole market | +18.3% | 25.9% | 0.78 | −42.4% | +407% | 0.14 | 0.69% |
| 51 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.31 | — | |
| 52 | BLXBladex, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +31.4% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | +290% | 0.26 | — |
| 53 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.15 | — | |
| 54 | EWPiShares MSCI Spain ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +19.2% | 20.3% | 0.97 | −46.4% | +196% | 0.26 | 0.50% |
| 55 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.27 | — | |
| 56 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.12 | — | |
| 57 | Whole market | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +521% | 0.34 | — | |
| 58 | BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | 0.14 | — |
| 59 | Whole market | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.12 | — | |
| 60 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | -0.05 | 0.09% | |
| 61 | Whole market | +25.4% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | +374% | 0.24 | — | |
| 62 | Whole market | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.09 | — | |
| 63 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.00 | 0.45% |
| 64 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 0.42 | — | |
| 65 | Whole market | +22.6% | 29.1% | 0.85 | −41.6% | +521% | 0.10 | — | |
| 66 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.34 | — | |
| 67 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.20 | — | |
| 68 | Whole market | +22.7% | 27.7% | 0.88 | −40.5% | +955% | 0.02 | — | |
| 69 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.23 | — | |
| 70 | FBIZFirst Business Financial Services, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +23.1% | 29.4% | 0.85 | −50.2% | +307% | 0.41 | — |
| 71 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.28 | — | |
| 72 | Whole market | +19.9% | 29.0% | 0.77 | −44.0% | +444% | 0.33 | — | |
| 73 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.34 | — | |
| 74 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Whole market | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.42 | — |
| 75 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.25 | — | |
| 76 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.66 | 0.80% |
| 77 | PAAPlains All American Pipeline, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Same or nearby category | +27.0% | 25.6% | 1.06 | −87.9% | +64.0% | 0.71 | — |
| 78 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.15 | — |
| 79 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.21 | — |
| 80 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.06 | 0.13% |
| 81 | Same or nearby category | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.75 | — | |
| 82 | CLHClean Harbors, Inc. · Environmental Services | Whole market | +23.1% | 28.6% | 0.88 | −64.5% | +588% | 0.26 | — |
| 83 | PAGPPlains GP Holdings LP · Oil & Gas Midstream | Same or nearby category | +26.8% | 26.1% | 1.05 | −88.0% | +56.3% | 0.72 | — |
| 84 | RGAReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated · Insurance | Whole market | +19.7% | 27.3% | 0.80 | −65.8% | +199% | 0.44 | — |
| 85 | BSACBanco Santander-Chile · Banks | Whole market | +19.5% | 29.0% | 0.76 | −63.9% | +154% | 0.32 | — |
| 86 | PSOPearson plc · Education Services | Whole market | +18.5% | 27.9% | 0.75 | −58.4% | +155% | 0.29 | — |
| 87 | Same or nearby category | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.63 | — | |
| 88 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.25 | — |
| 89 | FCFSFirstCash Holdings, Inc · Consumer Finance | Whole market | +20.6% | 30.5% | 0.77 | −50.2% | +422% | 0.23 | — |
| 90 | Same or nearby category | +23.4% | 30.2% | 0.85 | −57.5% | +616% | 0.52 | — | |
| 91 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.51 | — |
| 92 | Popular alternative | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.57 | — | |
| 93 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | -0.12 | 0.40% |
| 94 | FTXNFirst Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF · Energy | Whole market | +17.9% | 29.0% | 0.72 | −73.5% | +164% | 0.87 | 0.60% |
| 95 | DTMDT Midstream, Inc. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Same or nearby category | +24.5% | 25.2% | 1.00 | −23.6% | — | 0.50 | — |
| 96 | PSMTPriceSmart, Inc. · Discount Retail | Whole market | +18.6% | 28.2% | 0.75 | −53.2% | +124% | 0.08 | — |
| 97 | CNOCNO Financial Group, Inc. · Life Insurance | Whole market | +18.8% | 28.1% | 0.76 | −63.8% | +342% | 0.32 | — |
| 98 | MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy | Whole market | +18.6% | 19.7% | 0.97 | −64.6% | +186% | 0.71 | 0.45% |
| 99 | EUFNiShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF · Financial Sector Equity | Whole market | +18.5% | 21.8% | 0.89 | −53.2% | +233% | 0.28 | 0.49% |
| 100 | OFGOFG Bancorp · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.5% | 28.7% | 0.77 | −61.2% | +580% | 0.41 | — |
EOG against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against EOG, compared period by period and year by year.
How do EOG's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at EOG, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only XOM and WMB were both more rewarding and calmer than EOG over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Ten of the 18 popular alternatives earned less than EOG over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, EOG returned 16.6% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (32.3% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than EOG with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | +44.2% | 36.9% |
| PR Permian Resources Corporation | +33.1% | 47.1% |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | +27.1% | 26.5% |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | +24.6% | 24.0% |
| REPX Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. | +18.4% | 57.5% |
| COP ConocoPhillips | +18.2% | 32.6% |
| FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | +17.6% | 36.6% |
| CHRD Chord Energy Corporation | +16.7% | 39.1% |
| EOG This pageEOG Resources, Inc. | +16.6% | 32.3% |
| APA APA Corporation | +16.2% | 47.6% |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | +15.2% | 37.9% |
| OVV Ovintiv Inc. | +14.8% | 44.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MUR Murphy Oil Corporation | +11.8% | 45.0% |
| SLB Slb N.V. | +10.0% | 37.5% |
| DVN Devon Energy Corporation | +9.3% | 39.9% |
| HAL Halliburton Company | +6.9% | 39.4% |
| MTDR Matador Resources Company | +6.9% | 46.3% |
| SM SM Energy Company | +6.9% | 52.8% |
| MGY Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation | +6.3% | 38.9% |
Has EOG consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares EOG with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than EOG helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Four of the 19 popular alternatives, led by REPX, VLO and COP, outperformed EOG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- REPX and VLO outperformed EOG in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- VLO, XOM and WMB earned more for the risk they took than EOG (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than EOG over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. (this page) | — | +12.4% | +12.7% | +24.0% | +51.9% | +53.1% | +31.9% | +115% | +131% | 32.3% | 0.64 | −77.1% | — | $83B | — |
| REPX QualifiedRiley Exploration Permian, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +20.5% | +41.5% | +48.0% | +91.1% | +86.4% | +79.5% | +133% | +403% | 57.5% | 0.58 | −72.4% | — | $1.1B | — |
| VLO QualifiedValero Energy Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +10.2% | +38.9% | +93.2% | +166% | +176% | +259% | +524% | +1,061% | 36.9% | 1.18 | −71.9% | — | $125B | — |
| COP QualifiedConocoPhillips | 5/5 short2/3 long | +14.4% | +27.0% | +27.1% | +54.3% | +72.9% | +28.5% | +131% | +379% | 32.6% | 0.68 | −70.7% | — | $175B | — |
| PR QualifiedPermian Resources Corporation | 5/5 short2/3 long | +13.1% | +23.3% | +28.6% | +76.5% | +108% | +86.6% | +317% | +99.2% | 47.1% | 0.85 | −98.9% | — | $21B | — |
| XOM Oil & Gas IntegratedExxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 2/5 short3/3 long | +12.4% | +20.7% | +22.0% | +47.9% | +62.4% | +76.7% | +232% | +214% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | — | $731B | — |
| WMB Oil & Gas MidstreamThe Williams Companies, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −1.8% | −4.5% | +0.6% | +18.1% | +14.9% | +125% | +200% | +288% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | — | $86B | — |
| FANG Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionDiamondback Energy, Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | +6.9% | +4.2% | +11.6% | +35.1% | +46.8% | +35.7% | +125% | +160% | 36.6% | 0.63 | −88.7% | — | $57B | — |
| OVV Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOvintiv Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +16.8% | +22.2% | +32.8% | +76.3% | +98.3% | +52.5% | +99.6% | +56.0% | 44.8% | 0.54 | −96.8% | — | $19B | — |
| MTDR Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionMatador Resources Company | 0/5 short1/3 long | +6.2% | +8.3% | +3.2% | +35.4% | +36.6% | −5.3% | +39.7% | +168% | 46.3% | 0.38 | −96.5% | — | $7.1B | — |
| APA Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionAPA Corporation | 5/5 short0/3 long | +13.9% | +44.2% | +40.6% | +101% | +130% | +31.9% | +111% | +0.9% | 47.6% | 0.56 | −93.5% | — | $17B | — |
| SM Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionSM Energy Company | 4/5 short0/3 long | +11.8% | +24.9% | +46.1% | +108% | +88.7% | −1.4% | +39.5% | +123% | 52.8% | 0.39 | −94.7% | — | $9.2B | — |
| MUR Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionMurphy Oil Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +19.1% | +18.2% | +18.3% | +36.6% | +62.7% | +2.9% | +74.9% | +109% | 45.0% | 0.48 | −86.1% | — | $6.2B | — |
| CHRD Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionChord Energy Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +9.2% | +19.2% | +21.9% | +65.3% | +77.0% | +4.9% | +117% | — | 39.1% | 0.59 | −53.9% | — | $8.3B | — |
| CRGY Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionCrescent Energy Company | 3/5 short0/3 long | +1.9% | +30.3% | +15.0% | +63.4% | +73.9% | +26.7% | — | — | — | — | −56.2% | — | $4.5B | — |
| DVN Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionDevon Energy Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +5.9% | +15.8% | +13.6% | +35.6% | +61.8% | +15.0% | +56.0% | +69.6% | 39.9% | 0.42 | −88.5% | — | $55B | — |
| OXY Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOccidental Petroleum Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +9.9% | +14.5% | +16.6% | +50.6% | +56.4% | +2.0% | +103% | +11.6% | 37.9% | 0.56 | −88.4% | — | $63B | — |
| HAL Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesHalliburton Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | +0.6% | −3.9% | −7.6% | +15.0% | +51.5% | −14.7% | +39.8% | −17.1% | 39.4% | 0.37 | −91.5% | — | $28B | — |
| SLB Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesSlb N.V. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −3.4% | +8.3% | −3.3% | +26.4% | +53.2% | −7.2% | +60.7% | −21.3% | 37.5% | 0.44 | −84.5% | — | $74B | — |
| MGY Oil & Gas Exploration & ProductionMagnolia Oil & Gas Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | +4.9% | +0.4% | −7.8% | +15.5% | +14.0% | +18.4% | +35.9% | — | 38.9% | 0.35 | −77.8% | — | $6.0B | — |
How did EOG do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where EOG ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with EOG and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- EOG finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, FANG came out ahead of EOG most often, in ten of the 13 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, EOG finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 14 of 20.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of EOG; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places EOG among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of EOG | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOG This pageEOG Resources, Inc. | — | −11.4% | +4.3% | −2.0% | +56.9% | +88.6% | −38.6% | −2.8% | −18.7% | +7.5% | +44.0% | −22.5% | +10.3% | +39.7% | +23.4% | +8.5% | −5.5% | +47.4% | −25.0% | +43.6% | −14.6% | +106% | +55.3% | +16.1% | +2.5% | −28.1% | +212% | +2.5% | −18.0% | −15.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 29 | 14 of 20 | 8 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 11 of 19 | 11 of 18 | 12 of 18 | 7 of 18 | 8 of 17 | 8 of 16 | 8 of 16 | 3 of 16 | 6 of 16 | 3 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 13 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 4 of 14 | 6 of 14 | 14 of 14 | 2 of 14 | 3 of 14 | 12 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 7 of 13 | 1 of 13 | 11 of 13 | 4 of 13 | 13 of 13 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 16 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| REPX Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. | 11 of 29 | −12.7% | +23.8% | −3.8% | +60.1% | +34.4% | +153% | −48.4% | +18.7% | +14.3% | −41.7% | −53.5% | −33.9% | −35.0% | −15.7% | +12.6% | +40.5% | −27.4% | +23.9% | −28.5% | +75.0% | +53.8% | −65.3% | −31.8% | −86.7% | −30.4% | +17.6% | +82.8% | −56.1% | −5.4% |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 17 of 29 | +37.0% | −2.9% | +5.9% | +75.0% | +40.3% | −35.7% | +30.3% | −15.7% | +40.0% | +0.7% | +46.8% | +0.3% | +65.0% | +66.3% | −7.8% | +39.6% | −20.3% | −68.5% | +37.9% | −0.4% | +128% | +97.9% | +26.6% | −2.1% | +3.6% | +88.6% | −4.8% | −31.5% | +209% |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 15 of 29 | −2.3% | −12.2% | +2.0% | +72.2% | +87.1% | −36.0% | +6.6% | +15.6% | +11.9% | +10.1% | −29.0% | +1.5% | +27.1% | +8.0% | +11.0% | +38.6% | +2.8% | −39.9% | +25.4% | +26.5% | +36.9% | +35.6% | +39.8% | −17.5% | +8.6% | +24.2% | +13.6% | −9.8% | +13.1% |
| PR Permian Resources Corporation | 4 of 9 | +1.9% | +10.8% | +49.5% | +57.7% | +299% | −67.6% | −58.0% | −44.4% | +0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 16 of 29 | +16.0% | +11.3% | −6.3% | +87.4% | +57.6% | −36.2% | +7.2% | −15.1% | −3.8% | +19.9% | −12.8% | −6.0% | +20.1% | +4.7% | +18.7% | +10.1% | −12.6% | −13.1% | +24.3% | +39.1% | +11.8% | +28.1% | +20.7% | −8.9% | −7.5% | +10.2% | +12.7% | +22.5% | +28.3% |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +14.9% | +62.4% | +11.8% | +32.9% | +38.4% | −8.2% | +14.2% | −23.9% | +2.0% | +31.2% | −39.2% | +21.3% | +22.8% | +29.9% | +37.3% | +20.2% | +49.6% | −58.8% | +38.8% | +14.3% | +49.2% | +106% | +457% | −75.2% | −31.0% | +32.3% | −0.5% | +11.4% | +54.4% |
| FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 10 of 13 | −5.6% | +10.3% | +19.7% | +35.4% | +127% | −46.0% | +0.9% | −26.4% | +24.9% | +51.1% | +11.9% | +13.0% | +177% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| OVV Ovintiv Inc. | 10 of 24 | −0.3% | −5.2% | −10.9% | +53.3% | +138% | −34.8% | −17.6% | −56.4% | +14.2% | +132% | −62.1% | −22.0% | −5.2% | +10.8% | −34.3% | −7.8% | +697% | −28.6% | +51.8% | +3.3% | +60.1% | +47.1% | +29.4% | +22.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| MTDR Matador Resources Company | 7 of 13 | −22.3% | +0.4% | +0.5% | +55.8% | +207% | −32.9% | +15.7% | −50.1% | +20.9% | +30.3% | −2.3% | +8.5% | +127% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| APA APA Corporation | 12 of 29 | +11.5% | −33.5% | −21.2% | +76.4% | +90.7% | −43.7% | +1.1% | −36.4% | −32.2% | +45.7% | −27.7% | −26.3% | +10.5% | −12.7% | −23.6% | +16.3% | +39.5% | −30.2% | +62.9% | −2.3% | +36.2% | +25.4% | +50.3% | +15.2% | −21.2% | +90.5% | +47.1% | −27.2% | +0.7% |
| SM SM Energy Company | 12 of 29 | −49.7% | +1.8% | +13.1% | +18.6% | +382% | +10.2% | −26.1% | −29.3% | −35.3% | +76.5% | −48.8% | −53.5% | +59.6% | −28.3% | +24.3% | +73.0% | +70.1% | −47.1% | +5.4% | +0.5% | +77.6% | +47.3% | +15.0% | +19.1% | −35.8% | +171% | +35.4% | −45.9% | +43.0% |
| MUR Murphy Oil Corporation | 14 of 29 | +8.7% | −26.8% | +2.0% | +68.6% | +121% | −52.8% | +19.5% | −22.1% | +3.4% | +46.0% | −53.9% | −20.3% | +29.1% | +14.1% | −23.8% | +40.2% | +24.4% | −47.0% | +68.7% | −4.8% | +35.4% | +24.7% | +55.0% | +3.9% | +42.1% | +7.9% | +43.7% | −21.5% | +12.9% |
| CHRD Chord Energy Corporation | 2 of 5 | −16.4% | −25.0% | +31.8% | +34.1% | +261% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRGY Crescent Energy Company | 2 of 4 | −39.6% | +15.2% | +15.6% | −1.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DVN Devon Energy Corporation | 10 of 29 | +15.0% | −25.2% | −21.8% | +50.9% | +196% | −35.2% | +16.7% | −45.1% | −8.8% | +45.0% | −46.6% | +0.4% | +20.7% | −15.0% | −20.3% | +7.8% | +13.1% | −25.6% | +33.5% | +8.1% | +61.6% | +36.7% | +25.4% | +19.3% | −36.4% | +86.3% | +7.8% | −19.8% | +11.3% |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 13 of 29 | −14.9% | −15.9% | −4.1% | +119% | +67.7% | −56.6% | −28.3% | −13.1% | +8.5% | +9.8% | −12.7% | −8.9% | +27.8% | −16.1% | −2.6% | +22.7% | +38.4% | −20.7% | +60.2% | +24.2% | +39.2% | +41.3% | +53.1% | +11.0% | +13.4% | +17.7% | +35.7% | −39.8% | +30.3% |
| HAL Halliburton Company | 13 of 29 | +7.0% | −23.2% | −6.5% | +74.5% | +22.0% | −21.2% | −4.9% | −44.6% | −8.9% | +61.7% | −11.9% | −21.6% | +47.9% | +1.6% | −14.8% | +37.3% | +68.3% | −51.5% | +23.3% | +1.1% | +59.4% | +53.4% | +42.1% | +47.2% | −63.3% | −8.9% | +37.7% | −42.1% | +74.5% |
| SLB Slb N.V. | 12 of 29 | +3.3% | −24.5% | −0.8% | +81.1% | +39.6% | −43.8% | +17.8% | −44.7% | −18.5% | +23.5% | −16.3% | −3.6% | +32.1% | +3.0% | −17.2% | +30.0% | +56.2% | −56.5% | +57.1% | +31.1% | +46.6% | +23.8% | +32.0% | −22.2% | −30.3% | +43.9% | +34.9% | −41.6% | +63.2% |
| MGY Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation | 5 of 8 | −3.8% | +12.2% | −7.3% | +26.5% | +169% | −43.9% | +12.3% | +15.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How EOG has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were EOG's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents EOG's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1989, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of EOG's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: EOG fell 56.6% from July 1996 to December 1998, while the S&P 500 rose 78.8%.
- The slowest recovery came after EOG fell 68.0% from May 2008 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until July 2013, four years later.
Green means EOG fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | EOG fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Late-2018 sell-off | −77.1% | −14.4% | Oct 2018 | Mar 2020 | 17 months | Mar 2022 | 2 years |
| 2008 financial crisis | −68.0% | −49.3% | May 2008 | Mar 2009 | 10 months | Jul 2013 | 4.3 years |
| No named crash | −56.6% | +78.8% | Jul 1996 | Dec 1998 | 2.4 years | May 2000 | 17 months |
| Dot-com bust | −52.7% | −23.5% | Dec 2000 | Sep 2001 | 9 months | Jun 2004 | 2.8 years |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −48.3% | −2.3% | Jun 2014 | Jan 2016 | 19 months | Jan 2018 | 2 years |
How did EOG do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far EOG, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- EOG fell further than the S&P 500 in nine of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when EOG fell 61.5% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
- Among its popular alternatives, XOM held up best, falling less than EOG in all ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than EOG.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOG This pageEOG Resources, Inc. | — | −7.4% | −33.4% | −61.5% | −37.3% | −11.3% | −31.7% | −35.8% | −1.5% | −68.0% | −52.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| REPX Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −2.1% | −53.0% | −33.4% | −48.8% | −9.8% | −82.1% | −25.7% | −5.4% | −86.6% | −85.4% |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 4 of 10 | −3.5% | −31.9% | −61.3% | −42.0% | −6.9% | −24.2% | −35.6% | −4.3% | −80.7% | −54.1% |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 7 of 10 | −6.1% | −33.0% | −61.8% | −28.3% | −9.4% | −43.4% | −19.0% | −0.8% | −62.4% | −31.7% |
| PR Permian Resources Corporation | 1 of 5 | −8.2% | −44.3% | −90.1% | −55.9% | −7.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 10 of 10 | −3.1% | −20.5% | −47.9% | −23.6% | −10.0% | −15.0% | −19.6% | −0.3% | −33.7% | −33.6% |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −23.0% | −57.0% | −25.4% | −7.0% | −78.9% | −26.7% | −3.4% | −75.3% | −98.0% |
| FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −7.7% | −33.5% | −80.3% | −38.7% | −9.8% | −29.3% | — | — | — | — |
| OVV Ovintiv Inc. | 2 of 9 | −9.6% | −36.5% | −86.4% | −62.0% | −11.9% | −63.3% | −38.5% | −0.1% | −63.9% | — |
| MTDR Matador Resources Company | 1 of 6 | −9.5% | −34.6% | −90.8% | −58.7% | −10.3% | −54.8% | — | — | — | — |
| APA APA Corporation | 2 of 10 | −10.3% | −40.1% | −84.9% | −48.2% | −13.1% | −36.1% | −40.5% | −2.5% | −64.8% | −47.1% |
| SM SM Energy Company | 2 of 10 | −3.6% | −44.1% | −77.1% | −59.5% | −11.8% | −76.4% | −31.1% | −3.4% | −82.0% | −57.0% |
| MUR Murphy Oil Corporation | 3 of 10 | −7.9% | −40.4% | −79.1% | −37.6% | −10.7% | −52.4% | −39.3% | −2.5% | −63.0% | −34.3% |
| CHRD Chord Energy Corporation | 1 of 2 | −5.9% | −35.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CRGY Crescent Energy Company | 1 of 2 | −5.6% | −40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DVN Devon Energy Corporation | 0 of 10 | −8.3% | −33.6% | −75.9% | −49.4% | −13.4% | −55.2% | −36.6% | −2.3% | −68.6% | −52.9% |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 8 of 10 | −4.6% | −22.9% | −76.8% | −30.5% | −7.3% | −21.4% | −36.1% | 0.0% | −58.1% | −28.4% |
| HAL Halliburton Company | 1 of 10 | −10.2% | −45.5% | −79.1% | −40.0% | −10.5% | −32.7% | −49.8% | −4.3% | −75.0% | −82.8% |
| SLB Slb N.V. | 1 of 10 | −8.8% | −36.8% | −64.9% | −43.6% | −10.9% | −27.1% | −38.9% | −3.8% | −68.0% | −59.8% |
| MGY Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation | 3 of 5 | −6.6% | −38.1% | −63.6% | −33.6% | −0.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does EOG move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares EOG with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- WMB took just 78% of the S&P 500's losses, against 135% for EOG, while still keeping 85% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, EOG captured 92% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 135% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.17. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
- Six of the 16 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than EOG's 0.69, led by VLO, WMB and REPX.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than EOG's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOG This pageEOG Resources, Inc. | 92% | 135% | 0.69 | 1.17 |
| VLO Valero Energy Corporation | 142% | 114% | 1.24 | 1.31 |
| WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 85% | 78% | 1.08 | 1.02 |
| REPX Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. | 89% | 85% | 1.04 | 1.14 |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 94% | 92% | 1.02 | 0.91 |
| XOM Exxonmobil Holdings Corporation | 78% | 83% | 0.94 | 0.76 |
| FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 108% | 148% | 0.73 | 1.54 |
| MTDR Matador Resources Company | 156% | 239% | 0.65 | 2.70 |
| SM SM Energy Company | 154% | 244% | 0.63 | 3.21 |
| MUR Murphy Oil Corporation | 138% | 225% | 0.61 | 1.79 |
| PR Permian Resources Corporation | 139% | 234% | 0.59 | 3.38 |
| DVN Devon Energy Corporation | 118% | 199% | 0.59 | 1.80 |
| OVV Ovintiv Inc. | 131% | 228% | 0.58 | 2.14 |
| OXY Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 80% | 155% | 0.51 | 1.24 |
| APA APA Corporation | 124% | 246% | 0.50 | 2.54 |
| HAL Halliburton Company | 113% | 225% | 0.50 | 1.75 |
| SLB Slb N.V. | 104% | 212% | 0.49 | 1.54 |
What diversifies EOG?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with EOG's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing EOG with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in EOG into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+16.8% for EOG alone, +18.1% for the mix).
- FIX made money in nine of the 12 calendar years in which EOG lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and SMH have moved largely independently of EOG over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.46 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which EOG lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% EOG and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2023 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2015 | 2010 | 2008 | 2006 | 2001 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +115% | 0.64 | −11.4% | −2.0% | −38.6% | −2.8% | −18.7% | −22.5% | −5.5% | −25.0% | −14.6% | −28.1% | −18.0% | −15.5% | 30.3% | +16.8% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.46 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +17.4% | −9.0% | +17.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.1% | +17.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.11 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +42.0% | +3.9% | +18.9% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −1.8% | −20.8% | — | — | — | — | 24.6% | +19.6% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | -0.10 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | +73.4% | +55.5% | +64.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +19.0% | −44.7% | −6.7% | −14.6% | — | — | 24.5% | +22.8% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.20 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | +20.1% | +2.1% | +24.9% | −9.5% | +4.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.8% | +16.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.01 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | +12.7% | +24.8% | +17.9% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +29.3% | +4.9% | +22.6% | — | — | — | 24.4% | +18.1% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.06 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | +17.6% | +28.2% | +25.9% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.8% | +18.8% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.45 | +99.4% | 0.93 | +45.4% | +17.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.8% | +17.2% |
| VTV Broad MarketVanguard Morningstar Value ETF | 0.46 | +76.6% | 0.90 | +15.3% | +9.3% | +2.3% | +25.7% | −5.5% | −1.0% | +14.5% | −35.9% | +22.4% | — | — | — | 25.7% | +16.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2023 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2015 | 2010 | 2008 | 2006 | 2001 | 1998 | 1997 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EOG EOG Resources, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +115% | 0.64 | −11.4% | −2.0% | −38.6% | −2.8% | −18.7% | −22.5% | −5.5% | −25.0% | −14.6% | −28.1% | −18.0% | −15.5% | 30.3% | +16.8% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.12 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +34.1% | +10.1% | +18.0% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +21.4% | −39.6% | −5.8% | −2.5% | +51.7% | +29.1% | 25.4% | +22.0% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.11 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +160% | −2.4% | −5.7% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +2.8% | −20.5% | −26.0% | −25.6% | — | — | 28.1% | +35.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.06 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +79.6% | +6.7% | +15.1% | +0.8% | +67.7% | +8.7% | −15.2% | +38.9% | +73.7% | −9.5% | — | 26.3% | +31.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.27 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +24.1% | +27.1% | +26.7% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +13.8% | −40.4% | −1.2% | +4.9% | +46.9% | +96.3% | 26.0% | +21.2% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.12 | +594% | 1.36 | +87.9% | +37.8% | −7.2% | +83.6% | −37.5% | −36.3% | −2.8% | −67.4% | +5.5% | +9.8% | +7.0% | +11.8% | 26.0% | +24.3% |
Common questions
What was EOG's worst drawdown?
EOG's deepest decline since it began trading in 1989 was 77.1%, from October 2018 to March 2020. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were EOG's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, EOG's best year was 2000, when it returned 212%. Its worst was 2020, with a return of -38.6%.
Is there a better investment than EOG?
Among EOG's popular alternatives, XOM and WMB earned more than EOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. XOM returned 27.1% a year at 26.5% volatility, against 16.6% a year at 32.3%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CVX (integrated oil & gas) and E (integrated oil & gas) earned more than EOG with less volatility over the past 5 years. CVX returned 19.5% a year at 25.2% volatility, against 16.6% a year at 32.3%.
Is EOG more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. EOG's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.3%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, EOG's return lands within 32.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is EOG's Sharpe ratio?
EOG's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.64, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so EOG earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is EOG with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, EOG's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.19 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against EOG instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a EOG holding.
What are the best alternatives to EOG?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, four outperformed EOG in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: REPX, VLO and COP.
Did EOG outperform the S&P 500?
EOG finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -11.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did EOG do in stock market crashes?
EOG fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in nine. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when EOG fell 61.5% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies EOG?
These had a low correlation with EOG over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.46), DXJ (correlation 0.11) and SMH (correlation -0.10); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.12), CLS (correlation 0.11) and FIX (correlation 0.06). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than EOG's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of EOG's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to EOG
VLOValero Energy
COPConocoPhillips
XOMExxonmobil
WMBWilliams Companies
FANGDiamondback Energy
DVNDevon Energy
OXYOccidental Petroleum
SLBSlb