Relative Intelligence · Banks

How Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CM alone. It places CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CM stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: CM's full trading record, from November 1997 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, CM fell 3.3% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank) rose 2.1% and UBS (UBS Group) fell 8.3%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is CM's own: it fell 3.3% over the past 3 months while the banks ETF EWC (iShares MSCI Canada ETF) rose 3.8%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its bank peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank) rose 2.1%, while UBS (UBS Group) fell 8.3%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsCM has run far ahead of the market, rising 44.4% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (261% against 89.3%). CM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termCM turned $10,000 into $49,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. CM's 10-year return of 395% puts it ahead of 81% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, CM has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, CM has a correlation of 0.63 over 5 years, more closely than 94% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- MUFG (Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group), BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria) and SMFG (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group) were ahead of CM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (29.4%, 33.3% and 29.4% volatility against 21.6%).
- Nearby categories and themes
- BAP (Credicorp, banks) was ahead of CM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (30.2% volatility against 21.6%).
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) and SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund).
How much would $10,000 in CM have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CM over the past 28 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CM over the same span and CM's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in CM at the end of September 1998 would have grown to $457,207 by September 2026, more than the $121,630 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CM, and BAP finished highest, at $1,209,774.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1998 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 162 of the 1,106 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BAP$1M+11,998% total · +18.7% a year
- RY$529,885+5,199% total · +15.2% a year
- TD$523,409+5,134% total · +15.2% a year
- BCH$514,780+5,048% total · +15.1% a year
- GWW$463,803+4,538% total · +14.7% a year
- CM$457,207+4,472% total · +14.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$121,630+1,116% total · +9.3% a year
- BBVA$97,626+876% total · +8.5% a year
- SAN$86,433+764% total · +8.0% a year
- MUFG$65,916+559% total · +7.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 490 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BBVA$57,750+478% total · +42.0% a year
- MFG$46,041+360% total · +35.7% a year
- SAN$45,493+355% total · +35.4% a year
- SMFG$44,827+348% total · +35.0% a year
- MUFG$44,537+345% total · +34.8% a year
- BAP$44,181+342% total · +34.6% a year
- DXJ$32,976+230% total · +27.0% a year
- MFC$28,001+180% total · +22.9% a year
- CM$25,433+154% total · +20.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
CM at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- CM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1997 was 71.8%, from November 2007 to March 2009. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 28 full calendar years, CM's best was 2003, when it returned 87.9%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 37.9%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- CM is 7.9% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $103B
- Industry
- Banks - Diversified
- Price history from
- November 1997
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +44.4%total return
- Past 3 years
- +261%+53.4% a year
- Past 5 years
- +141%+19.2% a year
- Past 10 years
- +395%+17.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +87.9%2003
- Worst calendar year
- −37.9%2008
- Losing years
- 8 of 28full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 21.6%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.93return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −71.8%Nov 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −7.9%below the peak
CM against the whole market
Where CM ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does CM rank among all stocks?
This section ranks CM on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how CM stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- CM is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 5% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | CM | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +44.4% | 639 of 3,287 | top 19% |
| 3-year return | +261% | 283 of 3,017 | top 9% |
| 5-year return | +141% | 480 of 2,893 | top 17% |
| 10-year return | +395% | 423 of 2,202 | top 19% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 21.6% | 140 of 2,893 | top 5% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.93 | 151 of 2,893 | top 5% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −47.3% | 354 of 2,187 | top 16% |
What has beaten CM on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). CM sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than CM with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- One stock and four ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half CM's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 12% less than CM's 21.6%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.93 for CM.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to CM; faint dots are 1 more of the 5 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than CM?
Investments that beat CM over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among CM's popular alternatives, MUFG, BBVA and SMFG were ahead of CM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (29.4%, 33.3% and 29.4% volatility against 21.6%).
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, BAP (banks) was ahead of CM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (30.2% volatility against 21.6%).
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only five of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them MPLX, DXJ and SDCI.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat CM over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks CM's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than CM follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than CM's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× CM's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than CM's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with CM?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.63 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against CM. 3 of 21 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.46 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.22 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 4 shownEverything else in Banks and the categories next to it (Regional Banks, Capital Markets, Payment Processing, Asset Management), plus CM's specific themes. 4 of 124 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Higher return in most periods | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.52 | — | |
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.46 | — | ||
CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Smaller losses in recent crashes | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.11 | — | |
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +8.9% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | +407% | 0.36 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 51 of 3,488 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.32 | 0.48% | |
| On the frontierHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.04 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.42 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.21 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.43 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatility | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.30 | — | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +33.8% | 32.2% | 1.07 | −37.5% | +965% | 0.54 | — | ||
DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.38 | 0.45% | |
What these numbers mean for CM
- Annual return
- CM returned 19.2% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $24,100. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- CM's volatility over the past 5 years was 21.6%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CM's return lands within 21.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- CM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.93, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CM earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- CM's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 47.3%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 47.3% fall takes a 89.9% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, CM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.63 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CM holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 5 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than CM with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 4 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with CM | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.32 | 0.48% |
| 2 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.30 | — | |
| 3 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.38 | 0.45% |
| 4 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.03 | 0.80% |
CM against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against CM, compared period by period and year by year.
How do CM's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at CM, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 21 popular alternatives earned more than CM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, CM returned 19.2% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (21.6% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than CM with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | +38.7% | 33.3% |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | +33.7% | 29.4% |
| MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | +33.6% | 30.6% |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | +33.2% | 29.4% |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | +33.1% | 25.9% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | +31.6% | 33.9% |
| UBS UBS Group AG | +25.4% | 30.4% |
| BCH Banco de Chile | +25.2% | 28.2% |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | +24.7% | 31.1% |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | +22.6% | 24.0% |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | +22.1% | 37.4% |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | +20.3% | 32.1% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | +19.5% | 29.0% |
| CM This pageCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | +19.2% | 21.6% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | +18.5% | 34.1% |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | +17.3% | 18.2% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | +15.8% | 20.0% |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | +13.6% | 21.4% |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | +12.8% | 19.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | +11.7% | 19.4% |
| EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | +11.2% | 17.2% |
| BCE BCE Inc. | −11.3% | 20.0% |
Has CM consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares CM with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than CM helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Two of the 22 popular alternatives, SMFG and MUFG, outperformed CM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- MFG and RY earned more for the risk they took than CM (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than CM over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (this page) | — | −2.0% | −3.3% | +4.3% | +25.8% | +44.4% | +261% | +141% | +395% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | — | $103B | — |
| SMFG QualifiedSumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | −7.9% | −1.3% | +15.9% | +28.3% | +53.5% | +181% | +327% | +474% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | — | $94B | — |
| MUFG QualifiedMitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −6.9% | +1.8% | +19.6% | +36.5% | +41.3% | +184% | +319% | +483% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | — | $244B | — |
| BBVA Banks - DiversifiedBanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −10.4% | +3.1% | +11.7% | +11.3% | +35.2% | +281% | +413% | +542% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | — | $142B | — |
| SAN Banks - DiversifiedBanco Santander, S.A. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −10.2% | −1.4% | +4.5% | +9.8% | +35.9% | +305% | +295% | +332% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | — | $194B | — |
| MFG Banks - RegionalMizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | −10.6% | +0.7% | +15.2% | +33.7% | +53.1% | +216% | +326% | +345% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | — | $121B | — |
| MFC Insurance - LifeManulife Financial Corporation | 3/5 short1/3 long | −0.2% | +5.5% | +17.4% | +26.1% | +44.8% | +189% | +177% | +373% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | — | $74B | — |
| ING Banks - DiversifiedING Groep N.V. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −10.7% | +2.4% | +14.0% | +18.9% | +42.5% | +209% | +201% | +339% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | — | $94B | — |
| UBS Banks - DiversifiedUBS Group AG | 1/5 short1/3 long | −7.5% | −8.3% | +10.6% | +2.9% | +26.3% | +116% | +210% | +374% | 30.4% | 0.90 | −59.8% | — | $145B | — |
| HSBC Banks - DiversifiedHSBC Holdings plc | 1/5 short1/3 long | −10.1% | −5.9% | +2.3% | +19.8% | +47.7% | +201% | +318% | +319% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | — | $324B | — |
| BCH Banks - RegionalBanco de Chile | 1/5 short1/3 long | −4.6% | −1.0% | −3.7% | +8.6% | +25.2% | +138% | +208% | +180% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | — | $20B | — |
| LYG Banks - RegionalLloyds Banking Group plc | 0/5 short1/3 long | −8.1% | −6.7% | −2.5% | +1.7% | +22.4% | +207% | +152% | +213% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −66.5% | — | $80B | — |
| DB Banks - RegionalDeutsche Bank AG | 0/5 short1/3 long | −17.1% | −8.6% | −1.6% | −17.0% | −3.1% | +244% | +171% | +165% | 37.4% | 0.72 | −72.7% | — | $60B | — |
| TD Banks - DiversifiedThe Toronto-Dominion Bank | 5/5 short0/3 long | −0.9% | +2.1% | +16.3% | +33.1% | +57.5% | +141% | +109% | +310% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | — | $206B | — |
| BNS Banks - DiversifiedThe Bank of Nova Scotia | 4/5 short0/3 long | −2.3% | +6.9% | +22.4% | +28.9% | +50.0% | +162% | +83.1% | +187% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | — | $112B | — |
| SLF Insurance - DiversifiedSun Life Financial Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −2.2% | −0.4% | +15.2% | +30.4% | +35.5% | +96.3% | +74.1% | +255% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | — | $44B | — |
| BMO Banks - DiversifiedBank of Montreal | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.5% | −5.3% | +10.8% | +29.7% | +37.6% | +146% | +89.4% | +295% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | — | $116B | — |
| EWC InternationaliShares MSCI Canada ETF | 2/5 short0/3 long | +0.7% | +3.8% | +4.1% | +12.9% | +21.7% | +98.3% | +69.8% | +191% | 17.2% | 0.70 | −42.6% | 0.50% | $7.4B | — |
| BAM Asset ManagementBrookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −0.6% | −2.1% | −4.5% | −11.4% | −12.5% | +67.9% | — | — | — | — | −30.4% | — | $73B | — |
| RY Banks - DiversifiedRoyal Bank of Canada | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.5% | −4.8% | +12.0% | +18.9% | +39.2% | +173% | +122% | +352% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | — | $276B | — |
| BSAC Banks - RegionalBanco Santander-Chile | 1/5 short0/3 long | −4.1% | +0.2% | −2.0% | +11.4% | +24.0% | +124% | +144% | +154% | 29.0% | 0.76 | −63.9% | — | $16B | — |
| BCS Banks - DiversifiedBarclays PLC | 0/5 short0/3 long | −11.7% | −17.1% | −6.2% | −13.3% | +15.1% | +242% | +134% | +238% | 34.1% | 0.67 | −66.0% | — | $75B | — |
| BCE Telecommunications ServicesBCE Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.7% | −6.2% | −14.0% | −11.8% | −11.4% | −32.5% | −45.2% | −20.1% | 20.0% | -0.51 | −56.6% | — | $19B | — |
How did CM do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1998, along with where CM ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with CM and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CM finished in the top quarter in ten of 28 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 13 of 23.
- CM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 15 of its 28 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last two.
- Among its popular alternatives, BCH came out ahead of CM most often, in 16 of the 28 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of CM; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places CM among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of CM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM This pageCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | — | +49.0% | +37.9% | +26.5% | −26.8% | +44.7% | +9.3% | +20.3% | −19.8% | +23.5% | +29.8% | −19.6% | +4.8% | +11.0% | +16.8% | −3.3% | +27.1% | +64.3% | −37.9% | −12.0% | +32.5% | +13.7% | +26.0% | +87.9% | −14.9% | +14.2% | +38.0% | +1.2% | −17.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 10 of 28 | 13 of 23 | 7 of 23 | 10 of 23 | 21 of 22 | 3 of 22 | 3 of 22 | 9 of 22 | 12 of 22 | 9 of 22 | 6 of 22 | 19 of 22 | 6 of 22 | 16 of 22 | 19 of 22 | 6 of 22 | 6 of 22 | 10 of 22 | 4 of 22 | 17 of 22 | 7 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 1 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 4 of 19 | 5 of 17 | 10 of 14 | 11 of 14 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11 of 28 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 6 of 19 | +38.0% | +54.8% | +25.7% | +24.5% | +18.6% | −10.9% | +19.4% | −22.2% | +18.0% | +5.2% | +7.7% | −28.7% | +47.2% | +38.4% | −19.2% | +30.0% | −28.6% | −43.6% | −27.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 10 of 28 | +40.0% | +39.7% | +32.7% | +26.2% | +27.9% | −13.7% | +15.8% | −31.3% | +20.7% | +2.5% | +15.2% | −14.6% | +26.0% | +33.1% | −19.9% | +13.3% | −19.1% | −32.3% | −24.2% | −8.6% | +35.4% | +31.3% | +47.6% | −16.0% | −33.1% | −30.0% | +33.4% | −24.8% |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 10 of 28 | +154% | +14.2% | +62.5% | +10.0% | +22.2% | −6.4% | +10.9% | −35.0% | +31.3% | −1.5% | −19.3% | −20.6% | +39.6% | +18.2% | −10.8% | −39.7% | +53.1% | −45.6% | +4.6% | +39.4% | +4.1% | +32.9% | +47.9% | −19.3% | −13.1% | +8.9% | −9.5% | +51.7% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 12 of 28 | +165% | +14.9% | +46.4% | −6.8% | +10.2% | −19.6% | −2.2% | −28.5% | +33.3% | +12.3% | −37.9% | −0.4% | +27.4% | +22.8% | −20.2% | −30.2% | +91.8% | −52.3% | +20.2% | +47.1% | +10.5% | +6.8% | +77.6% | −11.3% | −19.8% | −7.6% | +20.1% | +23.7% |
| MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 7 of 19 | +54.5% | +47.8% | +26.2% | +17.2% | +4.9% | −12.8% | +7.3% | −14.1% | +4.9% | −7.2% | +23.0% | −19.3% | +22.2% | +43.0% | −23.4% | +10.1% | −35.1% | −38.1% | −33.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 10 of 26 | +22.9% | +45.2% | +31.0% | −1.3% | +12.1% | −7.1% | +49.2% | −29.3% | +20.9% | +23.6% | −19.0% | −0.6% | +49.7% | +33.5% | −36.0% | −3.3% | +12.5% | −56.9% | +23.2% | +17.2% | +29.8% | +45.7% | +51.7% | −15.4% | −16.0% | +152% | — | — |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 12 of 28 | +91.3% | +12.2% | +32.0% | −4.4% | +55.4% | −21.6% | +20.6% | −39.4% | +36.7% | +11.1% | +6.4% | −7.4% | +47.6% | +32.5% | −26.8% | −0.2% | −11.7% | −69.6% | −8.2% | +31.9% | +20.8% | +36.1% | +48.7% | −31.3% | −34.4% | +35.1% | +0.4% | +49.9% |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 10 of 25 | +57.6% | +0.7% | +69.8% | +7.4% | +29.4% | +19.5% | +7.1% | −29.9% | +17.4% | −14.4% | +18.1% | −10.2% | +23.3% | +34.3% | −28.2% | +6.2% | +8.5% | −68.9% | −21.5% | +32.5% | +18.2% | +27.9% | +50.4% | +1.7% | −8.0% | — | — | — |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 9 of 26 | +67.9% | +34.5% | +39.3% | +7.8% | +20.8% | −31.7% | +1.5% | −16.1% | +35.9% | +9.9% | −11.5% | −10.2% | +8.5% | +45.9% | −22.2% | −7.5% | +22.2% | −38.0% | −4.0% | +18.9% | −1.5% | +12.6% | +52.3% | −5.2% | −15.3% | +6.5% | — | — |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 16 of 28 | +77.6% | +3.9% | +20.3% | +39.2% | −21.6% | +1.1% | −24.7% | −6.9% | +45.0% | +25.9% | −8.2% | −16.5% | −3.7% | +24.0% | −2.5% | +72.4% | +79.1% | −25.6% | −3.3% | +37.0% | +9.5% | +43.4% | +81.3% | −6.8% | +28.8% | −18.8% | +51.0% | −35.4% |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 8 of 24 | +104% | +20.2% | +14.5% | −9.7% | +34.6% | −36.5% | +36.9% | −28.4% | +26.8% | −25.9% | −4.4% | −12.7% | +66.1% | +104% | −61.7% | +25.4% | −27.5% | −77.5% | −11.6% | +42.9% | −1.5% | +22.5% | +25.3% | −33.0% | — | — | — | — |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 9 of 28 | +133% | +29.4% | +21.4% | −5.9% | +14.7% | +40.1% | −2.9% | −56.7% | +6.4% | −25.0% | −17.7% | −36.4% | +10.9% | +19.7% | −26.1% | −20.1% | +75.4% | −65.5% | −0.6% | +42.0% | +12.3% | +9.8% | +83.6% | −34.3% | −22.1% | 0.0% | +58.2% | −16.7% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 14 of 28 | +85.3% | −13.4% | +4.5% | −12.2% | +41.3% | +5.6% | +17.5% | −12.1% | +22.9% | +30.9% | −14.9% | +5.0% | +16.1% | +16.8% | +4.1% | +22.7% | +85.4% | −46.8% | +20.4% | +16.1% | +30.7% | +29.7% | +61.4% | −11.7% | −7.2% | +11.2% | +58.4% | −2.9% |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 9 of 26 | +45.1% | +17.5% | +6.0% | −28.8% | +40.6% | +1.7% | +17.5% | −19.2% | +20.5% | +43.7% | −25.1% | −4.2% | +11.5% | +21.0% | −9.6% | +27.1% | +82.6% | −44.4% | +16.6% | +16.8% | +21.4% | +40.4% | +59.9% | +232% | +17.5% | +25.4% | — | — |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 10 of 25 | +9.7% | +19.5% | +16.9% | −12.9% | +29.7% | +2.0% | +42.7% | −16.6% | +10.3% | +27.6% | −10.2% | +5.9% | +39.3% | +52.5% | −34.9% | +10.2% | +31.1% | −57.0% | +35.5% | +8.2% | +22.7% | +38.3% | +51.6% | −18.9% | −17.2% | — | — | — |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 16 of 28 | +39.6% | +3.0% | +14.6% | −12.4% | +46.9% | +3.3% | +23.9% | −14.9% | +15.4% | +32.9% | −16.8% | +10.4% | +13.7% | +17.3% | −0.3% | +13.7% | +121% | −51.9% | −0.4% | +9.4% | +20.4% | +21.0% | +62.9% | +23.0% | −9.6% | +62.5% | −10.8% | −6.1% |
| EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 8 of 28 | +35.9% | +12.4% | +14.7% | −12.9% | +27.0% | +5.5% | +27.6% | −17.2% | +15.7% | +23.8% | −23.9% | +1.1% | +5.3% | +9.1% | −12.4% | +19.7% | +53.1% | −44.5% | +28.5% | +16.9% | +27.6% | +22.8% | +51.1% | −10.8% | −20.1% | +8.2% | +48.9% | −7.9% |
| BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 2 of 3 | −0.3% | +39.7% | +45.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 13 of 28 | +46.3% | +23.8% | +12.2% | −8.0% | +34.1% | +8.4% | +20.2% | −12.9% | +23.9% | +31.8% | −19.3% | +6.7% | +16.0% | +23.3% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +89.3% | −39.4% | +10.7% | +26.0% | +50.7% | +15.9% | +33.6% | +15.8% | −0.9% | +58.5% | −9.5% | −3.5% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 16 of 28 | +74.3% | +0.9% | +31.6% | +3.0% | −11.0% | −13.0% | −19.9% | −0.1% | +49.4% | +30.8% | −5.8% | −12.7% | −13.9% | +1.4% | −16.0% | +50.3% | +96.2% | −27.7% | +9.8% | +12.0% | +39.6% | +53.0% | +35.1% | −8.5% | +23.0% | −3.8% | +56.4% | −29.6% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 12 of 28 | +96.5% | +76.2% | +6.0% | −21.9% | +31.6% | −12.8% | +31.9% | −29.3% | +0.5% | −12.8% | −11.4% | −14.9% | +16.1% | +61.7% | −31.9% | −4.7% | +80.0% | −73.6% | −27.2% | +44.2% | −4.0% | +31.1% | +55.0% | −23.6% | +7.7% | +16.0% | +30.3% | −16.6% |
| BCE BCE Inc. | 11 of 28 | +10.2% | −35.5% | −4.2% | −10.7% | +28.6% | −2.0% | +23.9% | −12.6% | +15.0% | +17.3% | −11.6% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +8.6% | +23.8% | +35.5% | +43.3% | −47.1% | +53.1% | +7.8% | +3.5% | +13.5% | +30.0% | −16.3% | −17.6% | +41.8% | +164% | +31.3% |
Risk and diversification
How CM has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were CM's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents CM's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1997, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of CM's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after CM fell 71.8% from November 2007 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until December 2012, four years later.
Green means CM fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | CM fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −71.8% | −53.9% | Nov 2007 | Mar 2009 | 16 months | Dec 2012 | 3.8 years |
| No named crash | −58.5% | −10.5% | Apr 1998 | Oct 1998 | 6 months | Feb 2001 | 2.3 years |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −47.3% | −14.8% | Jan 2018 | Mar 2020 | 2.2 years | Nov 2020 | 8 months |
| 2022 bear market | −41.9% | −7.6% | Jan 2022 | Oct 2023 | 21 months | Aug 2024 | 10 months |
| Dot-com bust | −39.8% | −30.3% | Apr 2002 | Oct 2002 | 6 months | May 2003 | 7 months |
How did CM do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far CM, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, BCH held up best, falling less than CM in eight of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- CM fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when CM fell 71.8% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than CM.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM This pageCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | — | −7.0% | −36.2% | −43.6% | −22.2% | −5.9% | −25.3% | −12.9% | 0.0% | −71.8% | −39.8% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −9.2% | −24.7% | −32.2% | −23.2% | −4.5% | −44.2% | −19.8% | −2.2% | −70.9% | — |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −9.5% | −33.4% | −33.0% | −27.0% | −6.7% | −45.1% | −20.7% | −0.3% | −65.5% | −65.1% |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 0 of 10 | −10.9% | −39.6% | −47.9% | −22.7% | −5.4% | −41.0% | −32.7% | 0.0% | −75.7% | −55.9% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 1 of 10 | −11.4% | −41.0% | −48.1% | −19.0% | −6.0% | −44.7% | −33.2% | −0.9% | −76.1% | −58.4% |
| MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −9.7% | −24.1% | −29.6% | −18.1% | −4.2% | −34.9% | −17.7% | −1.0% | −72.2% | — |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 3 of 10 | −6.1% | −27.1% | −55.1% | −25.9% | −2.6% | −35.4% | −35.3% | 0.0% | −83.8% | −42.9% |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 0 of 10 | −10.7% | −43.4% | −56.9% | −24.1% | −5.8% | −35.4% | −47.4% | −3.6% | −93.0% | −66.4% |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 2 of 9 | −9.5% | −32.5% | −42.3% | −28.5% | −8.2% | −36.7% | −39.7% | −0.9% | −87.5% | — |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 4 of 10 | −7.3% | −31.8% | −20.5% | −13.1% | −4.6% | −30.8% | −25.1% | 0.0% | −73.8% | −41.4% |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 8 of 10 | −2.1% | −27.0% | −29.8% | −10.5% | −2.7% | −15.2% | −25.4% | −1.4% | −57.6% | −37.3% |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 1 of 9 | −7.8% | −40.5% | −53.4% | −23.3% | −4.3% | −34.6% | −41.6% | −4.5% | −94.8% | — |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 0 of 10 | −11.6% | −54.2% | −48.6% | −36.3% | −9.3% | −54.8% | −46.8% | 0.0% | −82.7% | −64.9% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 5 of 10 | −6.7% | −29.0% | −41.0% | −20.9% | −5.5% | −18.1% | −19.6% | 0.0% | −63.4% | −44.1% |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 7 of 10 | −4.6% | −35.4% | −43.0% | −17.7% | −6.1% | −24.3% | −19.8% | 0.0% | −63.8% | −23.6% |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 5 of 9 | −5.5% | −30.8% | −50.2% | −20.3% | −4.5% | −23.8% | −20.3% | −1.4% | −78.8% | — |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 5 of 10 | −5.5% | −30.5% | −49.4% | −23.5% | −6.2% | −18.9% | −16.4% | 0.0% | −68.5% | −26.5% |
| EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.8% | −42.6% | −19.4% | −5.3% | −26.4% | −24.7% | −0.1% | −60.8% | −51.7% |
| BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 0 of 1 | −7.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 7 of 10 | −3.8% | −26.0% | −40.0% | −17.1% | −5.7% | −23.1% | −21.8% | 0.0% | −63.1% | −21.6% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 7 of 10 | −6.0% | −37.0% | −38.1% | −12.4% | −4.5% | −22.6% | −29.0% | −1.2% | −48.4% | −28.0% |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 2 of 10 | −10.2% | −48.1% | −57.1% | −22.9% | −4.1% | −50.6% | −44.9% | −4.8% | −93.9% | −38.4% |
| BCE BCE Inc. | 8 of 10 | −1.7% | −28.9% | −33.9% | −7.3% | −2.1% | −17.0% | −9.8% | 0.0% | −60.7% | −50.7% |
How closely does CM move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares CM with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- TD took just 80% of the S&P 500's losses, against 106% for CM, while still keeping 89% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, CM captured 108% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 106% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.07. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Nine of the 21 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CM's 1.02, led by BCH, MUFG and SMFG.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than CM's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM This pageCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 108% | 106% | 1.02 | 1.07 |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 45% | 19% | 2.41 | 0.36 |
| MUFG Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 84% | 42% | 2.01 | 0.66 |
| SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 84% | 43% | 1.94 | 0.65 |
| MFG Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 75% | 42% | 1.81 | 0.54 |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 79% | 53% | 1.49 | 0.58 |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 121% | 97% | 1.25 | 1.11 |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 97% | 88% | 1.11 | 0.88 |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 101% | 92% | 1.10 | 1.02 |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 89% | 80% | 1.10 | 0.88 |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 87% | 85% | 1.02 | 0.96 |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 66% | 65% | 1.01 | 0.66 |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 110% | 110% | 1.00 | 1.10 |
| UBS UBS Group AG | 116% | 120% | 0.97 | 1.18 |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 104% | 112% | 0.93 | 1.12 |
| ING ING Groep N.V. | 136% | 155% | 0.88 | 1.36 |
| DB Deutsche Bank AG | 102% | 118% | 0.86 | 1.21 |
| EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 88% | 102% | 0.86 | 0.95 |
| BCS Barclays PLC | 113% | 131% | 0.86 | 1.26 |
| LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 106% | 130% | 0.82 | 1.20 |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 97% | 120% | 0.81 | 1.05 |
| BCE BCE Inc. | 43% | 100% | 0.43 | 0.50 |
What diversifies CM?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with CM's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing CM with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in CM into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+20.5% for CM alone, +20.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, HDV and MLPX have moved largely independently of CM over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.47 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, CLS and FIX have moved largely independently of CM over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.47 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which CM lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% CM and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2002 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (this page) | 1.00 | +141% | 0.93 | −26.8% | −19.8% | −19.6% | −3.3% | −37.9% | −12.0% | −14.9% | −17.2% | 25.4% | +20.5% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.32 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | 21.2% | +22.3% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.47 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −3.0% | −0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 21.8% | +19.2% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.44 | +135% | 0.97 | +21.5% | −15.5% | −35.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 22.2% | +21.0% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.48 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +6.8% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −47.0% | — | 24.4% | +24.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.15 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | — | 21.1% | +20.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.19 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +36.8% | −14.8% | — | 21.9% | +22.0% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.31 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −12.6% | −25.7% | +10.2% | — | — | — | — | 21.7% | +20.7% |
| PTLC Broad MarketPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 0.41 | +57.4% | 0.83 | −8.6% | +1.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.3% | +18.9% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2002 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (this page) | 1.00 | +141% | 0.93 | −26.8% | −19.8% | −19.6% | −3.3% | −37.9% | −12.0% | −14.9% | −17.2% | 25.4% | +20.5% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.20 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −8.3% | +51.7% | 22.0% | +24.8% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.36 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −65.1% | — | 26.8% | +37.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.47 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +2.1% | −9.4% | −9.5% | 25.7% | +33.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.04 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −27.2% | +46.9% | 21.1% | +24.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.14 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 22.1% | +27.0% |
Common questions
What was CM's worst drawdown?
CM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1997 was 71.8%, from November 2007 to March 2009. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were CM's best and worst years?
Over 28 full calendar years, CM's best year was 2003, when it returned 87.9%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -37.9%.
Is there a better investment than CM?
Among CM's popular alternatives, MUFG, BBVA and SMFG were ahead of CM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (29.4%, 33.3% and 29.4% volatility against 21.6%). Looking beyond its popular alternatives, BAP (banks) was ahead of CM in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (30.2% volatility against 21.6%).
Is CM more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. CM's volatility over the past 5 years was 21.6%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CM's return lands within 21.6% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is CM's Sharpe ratio?
CM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.93, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CM earned more for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is CM with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, CM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.63 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CM holding.
What are the best alternatives to CM?
Of the 22 popular alternatives we compared, two outperformed CM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: SMFG and MUFG.
Did CM outperform the S&P 500?
CM finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 15 of 28 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +49.0%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did CM do in stock market crashes?
CM fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in four of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when CM fell 71.8% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies CM?
These had a low correlation with CM over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.32), HDV (correlation 0.47) and MLPX (correlation 0.44); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.20), CLS (correlation 0.36) and FIX (correlation 0.47). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than CM's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of CM's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.