Relative Intelligence · Banks

How Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on BNS alone. It places BNS (The Bank of Nova Scotia) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where BNS stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: BNS's full trading record, from September 1999 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 6 months, BNS rose 22.4% against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. BNS sits 2.4% below its record high, and the S&P 500 is similarly close to its own. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?BNS rose 6.9% over the past 3 months, 3.1 points ahead of the banks ETF EWC (iShares MSCI Canada ETF), which rose 3.8%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its bank peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: ITUB (Itaú Unibanco Holding) rose 16.7%, while BAC (Bank of America) fell 15.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsBNS has run far ahead of the market, rising 50.0% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (162% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termBNS turned $10,000 into $28,700 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, BNS has typically fallen 1.2 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationBNS is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.76 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.77 with the total US market, more closely than 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- RY (Royal Bank of Canada) earned more than BNS with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 12.9% a year at 19.9%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CME (CME Group, capital markets) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, capital markets) fell less than BNS in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 42 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BNS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them KO (Coca-Cola), RY (Royal Bank of Canada) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares).
How much would $10,000 in BNS have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in BNS over the past 27 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of BNS over the same span and BNS's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in BNS at the end of September 1999 would have grown to $841,389 by September 2026, more than the $95,018 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of BNS, and NVDA finished highest, at $62,517,102.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1999 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 53 of the 1,166 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BNS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$63M+625,071% total · +38.2% a year
- AAPL$7M+70,243% total · +27.5% a year
- APH$3M+26,026% total · +22.9% a year
- LRCX$2M+18,889% total · +21.4% a year
- KLAC$1M+11,435% total · +19.2% a year
- BNS$841,389+8,314% total · +17.8% a year
- TD$345,321+3,353% total · +14.0% a year
- MFC$174,548+1,645% total · +11.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$95,018+850% total · +8.7% a year
- BBVA$80,684+707% total · +8.0% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 835 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BNS; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BBVA$57,750+478% total · +42.0% a year
- MFC$28,001+180% total · +22.9% a year
- CM$25,433+154% total · +20.5% a year
- RY$23,646+136% total · +18.8% a year
- GLD$23,190+132% total · +18.3% a year
- AMGN$23,160+132% total · +18.3% a year
- VLUE$22,395+124% total · +17.5% a year
- TD$21,998+120% total · +17.1% a year
- BNS$19,504+95.0% total · +14.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
BNS at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- BNS's deepest decline since it began trading in 1999 was 63.8%, from November 2007 to February 2009. It took 14 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 26 full calendar years, BNS's best was 2002, when it returned 232%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 44.4%. It lost money in six of those years.
- BNS is 2.4% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $112B
- Industry
- Banks - Diversified
- Price history from
- September 1999
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +50.0%total return
- Past 3 years
- +162%+37.9% a year
- Past 5 years
- +83.1%+12.9% a year
- Past 10 years
- +187%+11.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +232%2002
- Worst calendar year
- −44.4%2008
- Losing years
- 6 of 26full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 19.9%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.71return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −63.8%Nov 2007 to Feb 2009
- From its all-time high
- −2.4%below the peak
BNS against the whole market
Where BNS ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does BNS rank among all stocks?
This section ranks BNS on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how BNS stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- BNS is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 3% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | BNS | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +50.0% | 553 of 3,287 | top 17% |
| 3-year return | +162% | 531 of 3,017 | top 18% |
| 5-year return | +83.1% | 797 of 2,893 | top 28% |
| 10-year return | +187% | 918 of 2,202 | top 42% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 19.9% | 88 of 2,893 | top 3% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.71 | 443 of 2,893 | top 15% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −46.9% | 348 of 2,187 | top 16% |
What has beaten BNS on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). BNS sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than BNS with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Six stocks and 36 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than BNS over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half BNS's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 44% less than BNS's 19.9%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.71 for BNS. MPLX earned the most, 23.5% a year, while still swinging less than BNS (18.8% against 19.9%).
- Among BNS's popular alternatives, RY is in the region. RY earned 17.3% a year against 12.9% a year for BNS, at 18.2% volatility, 9% less than BNS's 19.9%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to BNS; faint dots are 23 more of the 42 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than BNS?
Investments that beat BNS over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among BNS's popular alternatives, RY earned more than BNS with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 12.9% a year at 19.9%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CME (capital markets) and ICE (capital markets) fell less than BNS in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 42 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BNS with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them KO, RY and GLD.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat BNS over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks BNS's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than BNS follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than BNS's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× BNS's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than BNS's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with BNS?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.76 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against BNS. 2 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.80 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.81 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 2 shownEverything else in Banks and the categories next to it (Regional Banks, Capital Markets, Payment Processing, Asset Management), plus BNS's specific themes. 2 of 125 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.14 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +5.4% | 21.8% | 0.35 | −34.3% | +240% | 0.39 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 207 of 3,488 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.41 | — | ||
VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.75 | 0.15% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.23 | 0.40% | ||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.27 | — | ||
ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.59 | — | |
FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.63 | 0.43% | |
MGVVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.6% | 13.4% | 0.95 | −35.4% | +244% | 0.76 | 0.05% | |
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.41 | 0.48% | |
What these numbers mean for BNS
- Annual return
- BNS returned 12.9% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $18,300. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- BNS's volatility over the past 5 years was 19.9%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BNS's return lands within 19.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- BNS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.71, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BNS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- BNS's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 46.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 46.9% fall takes a 88.2% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, BNS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.76 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BNS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BNS holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 42 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than BNS with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 31 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with BNS | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.41 | — | |
| 2 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.75 | 0.15% |
| 3 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.23 | 0.40% | |
| 4 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.59 | — |
| 5 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.63 | 0.43% |
| 6 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.64 | 0.40% |
| 7 | Popular alternative | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.80 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.74 | 0.26% | |
| 9 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.75 | 0.27% |
| 10 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.75 | 0.15% |
| 11 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.75 | 0.56% |
| 12 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.24 | — | |
| 13 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.72 | 0.40% |
| 14 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.72 | 0.12% |
| 15 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.64 | 0.60% |
| 16 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.40 | — | |
| 17 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.76 | 0.05% |
| 18 | FFLCFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +15.7% | 16.8% | 0.95 | −19.7% | — | 0.75 | 0.38% |
| 19 | IUSInvesco RAFI Strategic US ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.7% | 14.9% | 1.00 | −34.7% | — | 0.80 | 0.19% |
| 20 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.6% | 0.85 | −41.3% | — | 0.76 | 0.18% |
| 21 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.71 | 0.50% |
| 22 | EWJViShares MSCI Japan Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.2% | 0.86 | −30.1% | — | 0.64 | 0.15% |
| 23 | IDOGALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 15.6% | 0.93 | −37.3% | +180% | 0.67 | 0.50% |
| 24 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.41 | — | |
| 25 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.13 | 0.80% |
| 26 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.75 | 0.36% |
| 27 | AMLPAlerian MLP ETF · Energy Equity | Whole market | +16.1% | 18.9% | 0.89 | −72.9% | +91.0% | 0.38 | 1.01% |
| 28 | PPAInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETF · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 18.9% | 0.90 | −43.9% | +344% | 0.54 | 0.58% |
| 29 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.58 | 0.95% |
| 30 | TPYPTortoise North American Pipeline ETF · Energy | Whole market | +16.9% | 17.3% | 0.99 | −51.9% | +184% | 0.53 | 0.40% |
| 31 | GVALCambria Global Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.4% | 18.7% | 0.82 | −46.8% | +173% | 0.62 | 0.68% |
BNS against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against BNS, compared period by period and year by year.
How do BNS's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at BNS, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only RY was both more rewarding and calmer than BNS over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, BNS returned 12.8% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (19.9% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than BNS with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | +38.7% | 33.3% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | +31.6% | 33.9% |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | +26.3% | 33.8% |
| BCH Banco de Chile | +25.2% | 28.2% |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | +22.6% | 24.0% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | +19.5% | 29.0% |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | +19.2% | 21.6% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | +17.3% | 24.3% |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | +17.3% | 18.2% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | +15.8% | 20.0% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | +15.1% | 29.4% |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | +13.6% | 21.4% |
| BNS This pageThe Bank of Nova Scotia | +12.8% | 19.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | +12.1% | 22.6% |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | +11.7% | 19.4% |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | +11.1% | 39.3% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | +4.0% | 26.6% |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | +3.9% | 31.1% |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | +3.3% | 29.6% |
| BNT Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. | +1.2% | 31.5% |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | −0.5% | 34.4% |
Has BNS consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares BNS with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than BNS helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 21 popular alternatives, TD, outperformed BNS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- RY, TD and JPM earned more for the risk they took than BNS (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- RY outperformed BNS over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so BNS has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than BNS over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia (this page) | — | −2.3% | +6.9% | +22.4% | +28.9% | +50.0% | +162% | +83.1% | +187% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | — | $112B | — |
| TD QualifiedThe Toronto-Dominion Bank | 3/5 short2/3 long | −0.9% | +2.1% | +16.3% | +33.1% | +57.5% | +141% | +109% | +310% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | — | $206B | — |
| MFC Insurance - LifeManulife Financial Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | −0.2% | +5.5% | +17.4% | +26.1% | +44.8% | +189% | +177% | +373% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | — | $74B | — |
| BBVA Banks - DiversifiedBanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −10.4% | +3.1% | +11.7% | +11.3% | +35.2% | +281% | +413% | +542% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | — | $142B | — |
| CM Banks - DiversifiedCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 0/5 short3/3 long | −2.0% | −3.3% | +4.3% | +25.8% | +44.4% | +261% | +141% | +395% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | — | $103B | — |
| RY Banks - DiversifiedRoyal Bank of Canada | 0/5 short3/3 long | −3.5% | −4.8% | +12.0% | +18.9% | +39.2% | +173% | +122% | +352% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | — | $276B | — |
| SAN Banks - DiversifiedBanco Santander, S.A. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −10.2% | −1.4% | +4.5% | +9.8% | +35.9% | +305% | +295% | +332% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | — | $194B | — |
| C Banks - DiversifiedCitigroup Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −9.3% | −4.3% | −7.0% | +4.8% | +26.0% | +238% | +102% | +234% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | — | $206B | — |
| JPM Banks - DiversifiedJPMorgan Chase & Co. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −4.3% | −0.6% | +6.8% | +5.0% | +13.0% | +150% | +122% | +537% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | — | $891B | — |
| BMO Banks - DiversifiedBank of Montreal | 0/5 short2/3 long | −5.5% | −5.3% | +10.8% | +29.7% | +37.6% | +146% | +89.4% | +295% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | — | $116B | — |
| ITUB BanksItaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +14.8% | +16.7% | +5.8% | +37.2% | +46.3% | +147% | +221% | +190% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | — | $107B | — |
| SLF Insurance - DiversifiedSun Life Financial Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −2.2% | −0.4% | +15.2% | +30.4% | +35.5% | +96.3% | +74.1% | +255% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | — | $44B | — |
| BN Asset ManagementBrookfield Corporation | 1/5 short1/3 long | −1.7% | −11.8% | −19.8% | −19.6% | −16.8% | +85.9% | +20.8% | +226% | 31.1% | 0.28 | −51.4% | — | $83B | — |
| BAC Banks - DiversifiedBank of America Corporation | 0/5 short1/3 long | −12.6% | −15.8% | −5.2% | −8.0% | −0.6% | +107% | +21.6% | +282% | 26.6% | 0.28 | −49.0% | — | $354B | — |
| BCH Banks - RegionalBanco de Chile | 0/5 short1/3 long | −4.6% | −1.0% | −3.7% | +8.6% | +25.2% | +138% | +208% | +180% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | — | $20B | — |
| BSAC Banks - RegionalBanco Santander-Chile | 0/5 short1/3 long | −4.1% | +0.2% | −2.0% | +11.4% | +24.0% | +124% | +144% | +154% | 29.0% | 0.76 | −63.9% | — | $16B | — |
| BBD Banks - RegionalBanco Bradesco S.A. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +18.3% | +15.9% | +1.7% | +29.1% | +31.6% | +90.7% | +69.3% | +35.5% | 39.3% | 0.47 | −67.7% | — | $43B | — |
| USB Banks - RegionalU.S. Bancorp | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.3% | −5.5% | +5.5% | +12.7% | +30.3% | +117% | +17.6% | +94.6% | 29.6% | 0.26 | −52.1% | — | $92B | — |
| EWW InternationaliShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 1/5 short0/3 long | +2.4% | +0.5% | −4.1% | +10.0% | +18.4% | +57.6% | +77.4% | +89.7% | 22.6% | 0.62 | −53.6% | 0.50% | $1.5B | — |
| BAM Asset ManagementBrookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −0.6% | −2.1% | −4.5% | −11.4% | −12.5% | +67.9% | — | — | — | — | −30.4% | — | $73B | — |
| BNT Insurance - DiversifiedBrookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.8% | −11.8% | −19.7% | −19.6% | −16.7% | +85.8% | +5.9% | — | 31.5% | 0.19 | −48.9% | — | $12B | — |
| BSBR Banks - RegionalBanco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.4% | +6.0% | −10.8% | −6.8% | +6.6% | +18.6% | −2.6% | −1.2% | 34.4% | 0.16 | −70.6% | — | $42B | — |
How did BNS do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2000, along with where BNS ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with BNS and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- BNS finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 14 of its 26 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, RY came out ahead of BNS most often, in 17 of the 26 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, BNS finished in the top quarter in three of 26 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 13 of 22.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of BNS; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places BNS among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of BNS | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNS This pageThe Bank of Nova Scotia | — | +45.1% | +17.5% | +6.0% | −28.8% | +40.6% | +1.7% | +17.5% | −19.2% | +20.5% | +43.7% | −25.1% | −4.2% | +11.5% | +21.0% | −9.6% | +27.1% | +82.6% | −44.4% | +16.6% | +16.8% | +21.4% | +40.4% | +59.9% | +232% | +17.5% | +25.4% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 3 of 26 | 13 of 22 | 11 of 22 | 19 of 22 | 19 of 21 | 6 of 20 | 7 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 15 of 20 | 15 of 20 | 4 of 20 | 17 of 20 | 15 of 20 | 13 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 7 of 20 | 6 of 20 | 8 of 19 | 9 of 19 | 7 of 19 | 15 of 19 | 10 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 9 of 19 | 1 of 18 | 5 of 17 | 5 of 16 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 26 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 12 of 26 | +85.3% | −13.4% | +4.5% | −12.2% | +41.3% | +5.6% | +17.5% | −12.1% | +22.9% | +30.9% | −14.9% | +5.0% | +16.1% | +16.8% | +4.1% | +22.7% | +85.4% | −46.8% | +20.4% | +16.1% | +30.7% | +29.7% | +61.4% | −11.7% | −7.2% | +11.2% |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 12 of 26 | +22.9% | +45.2% | +31.0% | −1.3% | +12.1% | −7.1% | +49.2% | −29.3% | +20.9% | +23.6% | −19.0% | −0.6% | +49.7% | +33.5% | −36.0% | −3.3% | +12.5% | −56.9% | +23.2% | +17.2% | +29.8% | +45.7% | +51.7% | −15.4% | −16.0% | +152% |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 7 of 26 | +154% | +14.2% | +62.5% | +10.0% | +22.2% | −6.4% | +10.9% | −35.0% | +31.3% | −1.5% | −19.3% | −20.6% | +39.6% | +18.2% | −10.8% | −39.7% | +53.1% | −45.6% | +4.6% | +39.4% | +4.1% | +32.9% | +47.9% | −19.3% | −13.1% | +8.9% |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 15 of 26 | +49.0% | +37.9% | +26.5% | −26.8% | +44.7% | +9.3% | +20.3% | −19.8% | +23.5% | +29.8% | −19.6% | +4.8% | +11.0% | +16.8% | −3.3% | +27.1% | +64.3% | −37.9% | −12.0% | +32.5% | +13.7% | +26.0% | +87.9% | −14.9% | +14.2% | +38.0% |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 17 of 26 | +46.3% | +23.8% | +12.2% | −8.0% | +34.1% | +8.4% | +20.2% | −12.9% | +23.9% | +31.8% | −19.3% | +6.7% | +16.0% | +23.3% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +89.3% | −39.4% | +10.7% | +26.0% | +50.7% | +15.9% | +33.6% | +15.8% | −0.9% | +58.5% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 11 of 26 | +165% | +14.9% | +46.4% | −6.8% | +10.2% | −19.6% | −2.2% | −28.5% | +33.3% | +12.3% | −37.9% | −0.4% | +27.4% | +22.8% | −20.2% | −30.2% | +91.8% | −52.3% | +20.2% | +47.1% | +10.5% | +6.8% | +77.6% | −11.3% | −19.8% | −7.6% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 12 of 26 | +70.4% | +41.9% | +19.0% | −22.1% | +0.9% | −19.7% | +57.9% | −28.5% | +27.0% | +15.9% | −4.1% | +3.9% | +31.8% | +50.5% | −44.3% | +42.9% | −50.6% | −75.9% | −44.8% | +19.6% | +4.6% | +2.8% | +41.6% | −20.4% | +0.1% | +23.6% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 12 of 26 | +37.3% | +44.3% | +30.6% | −12.6% | +27.8% | −5.5% | +47.3% | −6.6% | +26.8% | +34.5% | +8.4% | +9.9% | +36.7% | +36.2% | −19.9% | +2.3% | +34.4% | −25.1% | −6.9% | +25.7% | +5.7% | +10.0% | +60.5% | −30.7% | −17.4% | −10.1% |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 13 of 26 | +39.6% | +3.0% | +14.6% | −12.4% | +46.9% | +3.3% | +23.9% | −14.9% | +15.4% | +32.9% | −16.8% | +10.4% | +13.7% | +17.3% | −0.3% | +13.7% | +121% | −51.9% | −0.4% | +9.4% | +20.4% | +21.0% | +62.9% | +23.0% | −9.6% | +62.5% |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 14 of 23 | +79.3% | −24.2% | +54.5% | +30.0% | −22.8% | −30.5% | +8.1% | +13.6% | +31.3% | +76.8% | −44.0% | +9.9% | −5.2% | −6.8% | −19.1% | +8.8% | +125% | −38.8% | +50.9% | +57.9% | +65.1% | +61.5% | +126% | — | — | — |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 11 of 25 | +9.7% | +19.5% | +16.9% | −12.9% | +29.7% | +2.0% | +42.7% | −16.6% | +10.3% | +27.6% | −10.2% | +5.9% | +39.3% | +52.5% | −34.9% | +10.2% | +31.1% | −57.0% | +35.5% | +8.2% | +22.7% | +38.3% | +51.6% | −18.9% | −17.2% | — |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | 15 of 26 | +20.6% | +44.1% | +29.1% | −35.0% | +48.9% | +8.5% | +52.3% | −10.7% | +34.2% | +8.0% | −4.4% | +31.1% | +11.5% | +53.5% | −16.3% | +53.6% | +49.6% | −56.5% | +12.3% | +45.8% | +42.7% | +81.4% | +54.9% | +19.6% | +32.2% | +16.8% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 12 of 26 | +28.0% | +33.9% | +4.9% | −23.8% | +49.6% | −11.6% | +46.1% | −15.0% | +35.7% | +33.4% | −4.8% | +15.7% | +34.5% | +109% | −58.1% | −11.2% | +7.6% | −63.1% | −18.9% | +20.8% | +2.4% | +21.5% | +20.1% | +14.6% | +42.7% | −4.5% |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 14 of 26 | +77.6% | +3.9% | +20.3% | +39.2% | −21.6% | +1.1% | −24.7% | −6.9% | +45.0% | +25.9% | −8.2% | −16.5% | −3.7% | +24.0% | −2.5% | +72.4% | +79.1% | −25.6% | −3.3% | +37.0% | +9.5% | +43.4% | +81.3% | −6.8% | +28.8% | −18.8% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 12 of 26 | +74.3% | +0.9% | +31.6% | +3.0% | −11.0% | −13.0% | −19.9% | −0.1% | +49.4% | +30.8% | −5.8% | −12.7% | −13.9% | +1.4% | −16.0% | +50.3% | +96.2% | −27.7% | +9.8% | +12.0% | +39.6% | +53.0% | +35.1% | −8.5% | +23.0% | −3.8% |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 13 of 24 | +96.9% | −42.2% | +34.8% | −5.1% | −25.4% | −33.6% | +15.7% | +9.7% | +33.6% | +108% | −55.3% | +9.1% | −19.5% | +6.1% | −16.2% | +13.9% | +124% | −52.7% | +58.7% | +39.4% | +133% | +445% | +78.3% | −41.8% | — | — |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | 9 of 26 | +16.4% | +15.6% | +4.8% | −19.1% | +24.3% | −17.9% | +33.6% | −12.4% | +6.6% | +23.4% | −2.8% | +13.8% | +29.6% | +20.9% | +2.3% | +20.7% | −9.0% | −16.6% | −8.0% | +26.3% | −0.5% | +10.6% | +45.3% | +5.3% | −6.8% | +13.2% |
| EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 11 of 26 | +53.6% | −28.2% | +40.3% | +1.2% | +20.3% | −3.0% | +12.7% | −14.6% | +14.5% | −10.3% | −14.3% | −11.6% | −1.6% | +32.8% | −12.0% | +28.0% | +53.9% | −41.1% | +11.4% | +44.9% | +43.8% | +48.9% | +39.0% | −14.8% | +15.4% | −24.0% |
| BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 2 of 3 | −0.3% | +39.7% | +45.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BNT Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. | 2 of 4 | +20.7% | +43.3% | +30.1% | −43.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 6 of 16 | +62.5% | −39.7% | +23.0% | +2.9% | −34.2% | −27.0% | +14.0% | +21.3% | +12.2% | +143% | −20.0% | −12.2% | −15.3% | −7.3% | −37.5% | +2.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How BNS has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were BNS's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents BNS's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1999, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of BNS's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: BNS fell 44.0% from July 2014 to January 2016, while the S&P 500 slipped only 3.2%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 22 months, after BNS fell 40.5% from March 2022 to October 2023.
Green means BNS fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | BNS fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −63.8% | −49.5% | Nov 2007 | Feb 2009 | 15 months | Apr 2010 | 14 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −46.9% | −17.4% | Jan 2018 | Mar 2020 | 2.2 years | Feb 2021 | 11 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −44.0% | −3.2% | Jul 2014 | Jan 2016 | 18 months | Feb 2017 | 13 months |
| 2022 bear market | −40.5% | −6.4% | Mar 2022 | Oct 2023 | 19 months | Aug 2025 | 22 months |
| 2011 euro debt crisis | −24.1% | −11.7% | Apr 2011 | Nov 2011 | 7 months | Dec 2012 | 13 months |
How did BNS do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far BNS, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, RY held up best, falling less than BNS in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- BNS fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when BNS fell 24.3% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than BNS.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNS This pageThe Bank of Nova Scotia | — | −4.6% | −35.4% | −43.0% | −17.7% | −6.1% | −24.3% | −19.8% | 0.0% | −63.8% | −23.6% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 4 of 10 | −6.7% | −29.0% | −41.0% | −20.9% | −5.5% | −18.1% | −19.6% | 0.0% | −63.4% | −44.1% |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 2 of 10 | −6.1% | −27.1% | −55.1% | −25.9% | −2.6% | −35.4% | −35.3% | 0.0% | −83.8% | −42.9% |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 1 of 10 | −10.9% | −39.6% | −47.9% | −22.7% | −5.4% | −41.0% | −32.7% | 0.0% | −75.7% | −55.9% |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 1 of 10 | −7.0% | −36.2% | −43.6% | −22.2% | −5.9% | −25.3% | −12.9% | 0.0% | −71.8% | −39.8% |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 7 of 10 | −3.8% | −26.0% | −40.0% | −17.1% | −5.7% | −23.1% | −21.8% | 0.0% | −63.1% | −21.6% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 0 of 10 | −11.4% | −41.0% | −48.1% | −19.0% | −6.0% | −44.7% | −33.2% | −0.9% | −76.1% | −58.4% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 0 of 10 | −11.7% | −39.2% | −54.8% | −33.1% | −6.7% | −40.3% | −42.6% | −1.0% | −97.7% | −52.7% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1 of 10 | −5.4% | −37.9% | −42.5% | −21.3% | −5.6% | −22.0% | −32.1% | −0.1% | −67.7% | −74.0% |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 3 of 10 | −5.5% | −30.5% | −49.4% | −23.5% | −6.2% | −18.9% | −16.4% | 0.0% | −68.5% | −26.5% |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 2 of 9 | −8.1% | −31.5% | −46.3% | −7.5% | −5.8% | −32.4% | −30.1% | −0.7% | −69.2% | — |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 2 of 9 | −5.5% | −30.8% | −50.2% | −20.3% | −4.5% | −23.8% | −20.3% | −1.4% | −78.8% | — |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | 4 of 10 | −10.5% | −36.2% | −51.4% | −18.1% | −5.2% | −22.7% | −18.7% | 0.0% | −70.9% | −20.7% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 0 of 10 | −12.4% | −38.7% | −47.8% | −26.4% | −6.9% | −37.8% | −45.2% | −0.6% | −93.4% | −36.3% |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 7 of 10 | −2.1% | −27.0% | −29.8% | −10.5% | −2.7% | −15.2% | −25.4% | −1.4% | −57.6% | −37.3% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 5 of 10 | −6.0% | −37.0% | −38.1% | −12.4% | −4.5% | −22.6% | −29.0% | −1.2% | −48.4% | −28.0% |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 2 of 9 | −6.9% | −30.2% | −54.5% | −7.6% | −6.3% | −44.3% | −25.1% | −0.8% | −69.0% | — |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | 1 of 10 | −19.7% | −36.8% | −47.2% | −20.4% | −7.5% | −17.7% | −24.7% | −1.2% | −76.1% | −42.8% |
| EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 2 of 10 | −6.5% | −19.7% | −47.2% | −26.9% | −6.3% | −21.2% | −23.6% | 0.0% | −64.6% | −38.8% |
| BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 0 of 1 | −7.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BNT Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. | 0 of 2 | −10.8% | −39.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 1 of 8 | −8.6% | −37.6% | −50.4% | −13.9% | −6.2% | −31.4% | −30.5% | −4.0% | — | — |
How closely does BNS move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares BNS with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 13 of the 19 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than BNS's 0.81, led by BCH, BBVA and ITUB.
- TD took just 80% of the S&P 500's losses, against 120% for BNS, while still keeping 89% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, BNS captured 97% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 120% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.05. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than BNS's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNS This pageThe Bank of Nova Scotia | 97% | 120% | 0.81 | 1.05 |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 45% | 19% | 2.41 | 0.36 |
| BBVA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. | 121% | 97% | 1.25 | 1.11 |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 66% | 58% | 1.15 | 0.65 |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 117% | 103% | 1.14 | 1.09 |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 97% | 88% | 1.11 | 0.88 |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 89% | 80% | 1.10 | 0.88 |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 101% | 92% | 1.10 | 1.02 |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 108% | 106% | 1.02 | 1.07 |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 87% | 85% | 1.02 | 0.96 |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 66% | 65% | 1.01 | 0.66 |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 110% | 110% | 1.00 | 1.10 |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 104% | 112% | 0.93 | 1.12 |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 127% | 146% | 0.87 | 1.36 |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 131% | 165% | 0.80 | 1.49 |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | 125% | 162% | 0.77 | 1.42 |
| EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 71% | 96% | 0.74 | 0.88 |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | 89% | 130% | 0.69 | 1.05 |
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. | 62% | 103% | 0.60 | 0.72 |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 56% | 102% | 0.55 | 0.74 |
What diversifies BNS?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with BNS's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing BNS with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in BNS into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 22% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+14.3% for BNS alone, +14.2% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, MLPX and GLD have moved largely independently of BNS over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.47 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- CAH made money in four of the six calendar years in which BNS lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which BNS lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% BNS and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia (this page) | 1.00 | +83.1% | 0.71 | −28.8% | −19.2% | −25.1% | −4.2% | −9.6% | −44.4% | 24.0% | +14.3% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.41 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −16.1% | −20.8% | 20.3% | +17.2% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.47 | +135% | 0.97 | +21.5% | −15.5% | −35.3% | +16.2% | — | — | 21.2% | +15.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.23 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +9.6% | +4.9% | 20.2% | +15.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.29 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −8.7% | +2.8% | −39.0% | 21.3% | +16.8% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.38 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −12.6% | −25.7% | +4.8% | +10.2% | — | 20.8% | +15.6% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.26 | +59.7% | 0.82 | +21.6% | — | — | — | — | — | 18.7% | +14.2% |
| DBA AlternativesInvesco DB Agriculture Fund | 0.29 | +66.4% | 0.81 | +2.5% | −8.7% | −17.2% | +2.6% | −10.7% | −19.1% | 19.9% | +14.1% |
| GDX MaterialsVanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.35 | +181% | 0.73 | −9.0% | −8.8% | −24.7% | −12.4% | −16.1% | −26.1% | 23.0% | +17.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia (this page) | 1.00 | +83.1% | 0.71 | −28.8% | −19.2% | −25.1% | −4.2% | −9.6% | −44.4% | 24.0% | +14.3% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.26 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | +8.1% | −39.6% | 21.2% | +19.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.30 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +12.9% | −24.4% | −20.5% | 25.3% | +32.1% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.43 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −10.4% | −17.0% | −15.2% | 24.4% | +28.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.17 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +29.3% | +11.8% | −40.4% | 20.6% | +19.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.25 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +0.4% | — | — | 21.7% | +21.6% |
Common questions
What was BNS's worst drawdown?
BNS's deepest decline since it began trading in 1999 was 63.8%, from November 2007 to February 2009. It took 14 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were BNS's best and worst years?
Over 26 full calendar years, BNS's best year was 2002, when it returned 232%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -44.4%.
Is there a better investment than BNS?
Among BNS's popular alternatives, RY earned more than BNS with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 12.9% a year at 19.9%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CME (capital markets) and ICE (capital markets) fell less than BNS in each recent sell-off and kept up with it over the past decade.
Is BNS more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. BNS's volatility over the past 5 years was 19.9%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BNS's return lands within 19.9% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is BNS's Sharpe ratio?
BNS's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.71, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BNS earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is BNS with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, BNS's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.76 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BNS instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BNS holding.
What are the best alternatives to BNS?
Of the 21 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed BNS in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: TD.
Did BNS outperform the S&P 500?
BNS finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 14 of 26 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +45.1%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did BNS do in stock market crashes?
BNS fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when BNS fell 24.3% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies BNS?
These had a low correlation with BNS over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.41), MLPX (correlation 0.47) and GLD (correlation 0.23); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.26), CLS (correlation 0.30) and FIX (correlation 0.43). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than BNS's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of BNS's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.