Relative Intelligence · Banks

How Banco Bradesco (BBD) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on BBD alone. It places BBD (Banco Bradesco S.A.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where BBD stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: BBD's full trading record, from November 2001 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowBBD has outpaced the market, rising 15.9% over the past 3 months against 3.9% for the S&P 500 and 3.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Its bank peers split over the past 3 months: BBDO (Banco Bradesco) rose 20.6%, while SAN (Banco Santander) fell 1.4%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?BBD held up far better than its industry: it rose 15.9% over the past 3 months while the banks ETF IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) fell 0.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. BBD rose 18.3% last month as the S&P 500 fell 0.6% and the Nasdaq 100 fell 3.2%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, BBD rose 31.6% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. A behind 75% of stocks worth at least $300 million over 10 years, but ahead of 67% of the stocks worth at least $300 million over 3 years. By year ↓
- Long termBBD turned $10,000 into $13,600 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, BBD has typically fallen 1.6 times as far as the S&P 500. That said, in the 2022 bear market, BBD held up better than SAN (Banco Santander), ITUB and NU; only BCH (Banco de Chile) and BLX fell less. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationBBD is a real diversifier: a correlation of 0.19 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.19 with the total US market, less closely than 87% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Even so, over 10 years, BBD's beta versus the S&P 500 was 0.72: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 62% as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.0 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Nearby categories and themes
- RY (Royal Bank of Canada, banks) and HSBC (banks) earned more than BBD with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 11.1% a year at 39.3%.
- Whole market
- 589 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BBD with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL (Apple), GOOG (Alphabet) and MSFT (Microsoft).
How much would $10,000 in BBD have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in BBD over the past 24 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of BBD over the same span and BBD's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in BBD at the end of September 2002 would have grown to $836,693 by September 2026, more than the $144,215 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of BBD, and MNST finished highest, at $19,302,640.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2002 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 73 of the 1,370 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BBD; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MNST$19M+192,926% total · +37.1% a year
- CIB$2M+19,238% total · +24.5% a year
- TSM$2M+18,370% total · +24.3% a year
- BAP$1M+11,517% total · +21.9% a year
- BLX$1M+11,011% total · +21.7% a year
- BBD$836,693+8,267% total · +20.3% a year
- ITUB$760,624+7,506% total · +19.8% a year
- EWZ$152,031+1,420% total · +12.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$144,215+1,342% total · +11.8% a year
- SAN$116,215+1,062% total · +10.8% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,627 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BBD; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- SAN$45,493+355% total · +35.4% a year
- BAP$44,181+342% total · +34.6% a year
- BLX$42,192+322% total · +33.4% a year
- CIB$41,844+318% total · +33.1% a year
- ITUB$29,014+190% total · +23.7% a year
- BCH$28,909+189% total · +23.7% a year
- BSAC$22,123+121% total · +17.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- EWZ$17,118+71.2% total · +11.4% a year
- BBD$14,557+45.6% total · +7.8% a year
BBD at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- BBD's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 73.4%, from November 2010 to January 2016. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 24 full calendar years, BBD's best was 2004, when it returned 445%, and its worst was 2015, when it lost 55.3%. It lost money in nine of those years.
- BBD is 14.5% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $43B
- Industry
- Banks - Regional
- Price history from
- November 2001
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +31.6%total return
- Past 3 years
- +90.7%+24.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- +69.3%+11.1% a year
- Past 10 years
- +35.5%+3.1% a year
- Best calendar year
- +445%2004
- Worst calendar year
- −55.3%2015
- Losing years
- 9 of 24full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 39.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.47return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −73.4%Nov 2010 to Jan 2016
- From its all-time high
- −14.5%below the peak
BBD against the whole market
Where BBD ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does BBD rank among all stocks?
This section ranks BBD on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how BBD stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- BBD lands in the broad middle of the market on every measure here. BBD's 1-year return ranks in the top 28% of the 3,287 stocks worth at least $300 million with 1 year of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | BBD | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +31.6% | 925 of 3,287 | top 28% |
| 3-year return | +90.7% | 999 of 3,017 | top 33% |
| 5-year return | +69.3% | 908 of 2,893 | top 31% |
| 10-year return | +35.5% | 1,649 of 2,202 | bottom 26% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 39.3% | 1,415 of 2,893 | top 49% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.47 | 1,025 of 2,893 | top 35% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −67.7% | 1,206 of 2,187 | bottom 46% |
What has beaten BBD on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). BBD sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than BBD with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 383 stocks and 206 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than BBD over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 16% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half BBD's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 37% less than BBD's 39.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.47 for BBD. MPC earned the most, 51.2% a year, while still swinging less than BBD (33.4% against 39.3%).
- Among BBD's popular alternatives, BLX, BAP and CIB are in the region. BLX earned 31.4% a year against 11.1% a year for BBD, at 25.9% volatility, 34% less than BBD's 39.3%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to BBD; faint dots are 87 more of the 589 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than BBD?
Investments that beat BBD over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among BBD's popular alternatives, ITUB, BAP and EWZ earned more than BBD with less volatility over the past 5 years. ITUB returned 26.3% a year at 33.8% volatility, against 11.1% a year at 39.3%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RY (banks) and HSBC (banks) earned more than BBD with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 11.1% a year at 39.3%.
- Across the whole market, 589 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BBD with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them AAPL, GOOG and MSFT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat BBD over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks BBD's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than BBD follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than BBD's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× BBD's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than BBD's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with BBD?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +11.1% | 39.3% | 0.47 | −67.7% | +35.5% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.19 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against BBD. 8 of 18 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +190% | 0.87 | — | ||
BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.42 | — | |
EWZiShares MSCI Brazil ETF · International Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.9% | 27.7% | 0.64 | −57.0% | +90.3% | 0.84 | 0.59% | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +31.7% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | +332% | 0.29 | — | ||
CIBGrupo Cibest S.A. · Banks | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +32.9% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | +345% | 0.50 | — | |
BCHBanco de Chile · Banks | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +25.2% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | +180% | 0.55 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Banks and the categories next to it (Regional Banks, Capital Markets, Payment Processing, Asset Management), plus BBD's specific themes. 56 of 130 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.33 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.20 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.05 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.05 | — | ||
FCNCAFirst Citizens BancShares, Inc. · Regional Banks | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.4% | 41.4% | 0.64 | −47.5% | +662% | 0.00 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,059 of 3,485 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.29 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.01 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.21 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.24 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.06 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +31.5% | 38.5% | 0.91 | −56.6% | +1,505% | 0.10 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.16 | 0.40% | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +11.7% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | +255% | 0.31 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for BBD
- Annual return
- BBD returned 11.1% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $16,900. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- BBD's volatility over the past 5 years was 39.3%, 2.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BBD's return lands within 39.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- BBD's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.47, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BBD earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- BBD's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 67.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 67.7% fall takes a 210% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, BBD's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.19 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BBD instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BBD holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 589 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than BBD with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with BBD | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.29 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.01 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.21 | — | |
| 4 | Same or nearby category | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.33 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.24 | — | |
| 6 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.06 | 0.48% |
| 7 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.14 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +19.5% | 25.2% | 0.84 | −55.8% | +238% | 0.17 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | -0.10 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.12 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +16.3% | 24.8% | 0.74 | −43.4% | +241% | 0.02 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.17 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.08 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +18.0% | 25.8% | 0.78 | −59.6% | +234% | 0.29 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +16.6% | 31.4% | 0.65 | −44.3% | +398% | 0.18 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.23 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.15 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.31 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.27 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +22.0% | 28.6% | 0.84 | −61.3% | +544% | 0.18 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.24 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.24 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.07 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +21.0% | 26.8% | 0.85 | −50.8% | +694% | 0.07 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | -0.04 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.11 | 0.35% | |
| 27 | Whole market | +17.4% | 29.1% | 0.70 | −46.4% | +426% | 0.18 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +18.1% | 29.5% | 0.71 | −51.4% | +312% | -0.03 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +12.7% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | +309% | 0.01 | — | |
| 30 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.15 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +14.8% | 31.6% | 0.59 | −54.6% | +670% | 0.13 | — | |
| 32 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.23 | — | |
| 33 | Same or nearby category | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.20 | — | |
| 34 | Whole market | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.10 | — | |
| 35 | Whole market | +14.0% | 25.7% | 0.64 | −45.5% | +79.7% | 0.25 | — | |
| 36 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.19 | — |
| 37 | IHGInterContinental Hotels Group PLC · Hotels & Resorts | Whole market | +21.4% | 26.6% | 0.86 | −59.3% | +383% | 0.01 | — |
| 38 | Same or nearby category | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.10 | — | |
| 39 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.05 | — |
| 40 | CQPCheniere Energy Partners, L.P. · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +15.3% | 32.9% | 0.60 | −60.3% | +319% | 0.09 | — |
| 41 | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +13.3% | 23.8% | 0.65 | −49.7% | — | 0.04 | — |
| 42 | FFIVF5, Inc. · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +17.1% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | +287% | 0.00 | — |
| 43 | SNXTD Synnex Corp · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +20.3% | 30.4% | 0.76 | −55.8% | +430% | 0.12 | — |
| 44 | Same or nearby category | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.05 | — | |
| 45 | Same or nearby category | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | -0.10 | — | |
| 46 | AITApplied Industrial Technologies, Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +28.5% | 30.3% | 0.98 | −59.3% | +742% | -0.08 | — |
| 47 | EXELExelixis, Inc. · Biotechnology | Whole market | +24.4% | 35.8% | 0.79 | −57.2% | +448% | -0.05 | — |
| 48 | EWYiShares MSCI South Korea ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 34.0% | 0.61 | −49.7% | +230% | 0.19 | 0.59% |
| 49 | Same or nearby category | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.37 | — | |
| 50 | RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 27.8% | 0.80 | −40.7% | +215% | -0.12 | — |
| 51 | Whole market | +51.2% | 33.4% | 1.41 | −79.7% | +1,387% | 0.20 | — | |
| 52 | Same or nearby category | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.16 | — | |
| 53 | Same or nearby category | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.38 | — | |
| 54 | HSTHost Hotels & Resorts, Inc. · Hotel REITs | Whole market | +13.8% | 30.0% | 0.58 | −55.0% | +144% | 0.30 | — |
| 55 | MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.11 | — |
| 56 | CACICACI International Inc · Business Services | Whole market | +16.6% | 29.9% | 0.66 | −42.9% | +499% | 0.22 | — |
| 57 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.21 | 0.15% |
| 58 | AIZAssurant, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +13.3% | 25.3% | 0.62 | −44.6% | +312% | 0.13 | — |
| 59 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.15 | — |
| 60 | Same or nearby category | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.34 | — | |
| 61 | Same or nearby category | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.28 | — | |
| 62 | FCFSFirstCash Holdings, Inc · Consumer Finance | Whole market | +20.6% | 30.5% | 0.77 | −50.2% | +422% | 0.12 | — |
| 63 | AVTAvnet, Inc. · Technology Distribution | Whole market | +22.1% | 30.7% | 0.81 | −58.4% | +173% | 0.19 | — |
| 64 | ACAArcosa, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +23.1% | 34.0% | 0.78 | −36.8% | — | 0.24 | — |
| 65 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.16 | 0.40% | |
| 66 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.10 | — |
| 67 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Same or nearby category | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.09 | — |
| 68 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.22 | — |
| 69 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.09 | 0.19% |
| 70 | Popular alternative | +26.3% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | +190% | 0.87 | — | |
| 71 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.12 | 0.40% |
| 72 | MSMMSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. · Industrial Distribution | Whole market | +13.3% | 25.1% | 0.63 | −48.2% | +184% | 0.23 | — |
| 73 | BAPCredicorp Ltd. · Banks | Popular alternative | +30.8% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | +298% | 0.42 | — |
| 74 | PSMTPriceSmart, Inc. · Discount Retail | Whole market | +18.6% | 28.2% | 0.75 | −53.2% | +124% | 0.18 | — |
| 75 | Same or nearby category | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −59.6% | +212% | 0.23 | — | |
| 76 | HRBH&R Block, Inc. · Tax Preparation | Whole market | +18.3% | 34.9% | 0.65 | −57.7% | +206% | 0.00 | — |
| 77 | MCYMercury General Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +17.0% | 34.3% | 0.63 | −55.3% | +198% | 0.03 | — |
| 78 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +139% | 0.13 | 0.98% |
| 79 | Whole market | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.00 | — | |
| 80 | FRDMFreedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF · International | Whole market | +17.3% | 22.8% | 0.82 | −40.5% | — | 0.37 | 0.49% |
| 81 | VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Same or nearby category | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | -0.03 | — |
| 82 | SEICSEI Investments Company · Asset Management | Same or nearby category | +12.7% | 22.3% | 0.65 | −51.8% | +168% | 0.15 | — |
| 83 | BPOPPopular, Inc. · Regional Banks | Same or nearby category | +17.7% | 29.7% | 0.70 | −59.0% | +448% | 0.21 | — |
| 84 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.21 | 0.05% |
| 85 | HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +12.6% | 25.8% | 0.59 | −38.7% | +373% | 0.00 | 0.60% |
| 86 | IFSIntercorp Financial Services Inc. · Regional Banks | Same or nearby category | +20.8% | 31.1% | 0.77 | −56.9% | — | 0.25 | — |
| 87 | VIRTVirtu Financial, Inc. · Capital Markets | Same or nearby category | +20.8% | 33.8% | 0.73 | −56.2% | +545% | 0.19 | — |
| 88 | CNXNPC Connection, Inc. · Technology Distributors | Whole market | +15.8% | 29.2% | 0.65 | −41.8% | +277% | 0.15 | — |
| 89 | SRCE1st Source Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.1% | 27.0% | 0.66 | −51.7% | +210% | 0.20 | — |
| 90 | IHEiShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.6% | 16.8% | 0.80 | −29.6% | +151% | 0.16 | 0.37% |
| 91 | DMLPDorchester Minerals, L.P. · Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Whole market | +21.1% | 29.1% | 0.81 | −56.8% | +435% | 0.24 | — |
| 92 | GRCThe Gorman-Rupp Company · Industrial - Machinery | Whole market | +15.1% | 31.3% | 0.61 | −49.3% | +281% | 0.04 | — |
| 93 | SFLSFL Corporation Ltd · Marine Shipping | Whole market | +17.0% | 30.4% | 0.67 | −55.3% | +123% | 0.16 | — |
| 94 | STBAS&T Bancorp, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +13.9% | 28.2% | 0.60 | −61.7% | +141% | 0.13 | — |
| 95 | RBCAARepublic Bancorp, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.8% | 27.9% | 0.64 | −44.7% | +318% | 0.12 | — |
| 96 | NWPXNWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · Construction Materials | Whole market | +32.5% | 36.2% | 0.96 | −46.5% | +682% | 0.05 | — |
| 97 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.12 | — | |
| 98 | HBTHBT Financial, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +18.9% | 28.7% | 0.75 | −54.0% | — | 0.02 | — |
| 99 | COMTiShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF · Commodities | Whole market | +13.1% | 21.1% | 0.69 | −39.2% | +160% | 0.10 | 0.49% |
| 100 | QCRHQCR Holdings, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +14.1% | 29.0% | 0.60 | −53.0% | +233% | 0.06 | — |
BBD against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against BBD, compared period by period and year by year.
How do BBD's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at BBD, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Eight of the 18 popular alternatives, led by CIB, SAN and BLX, were both more rewarding and calmer than BBD over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, BBD returned 11.1% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (39.3% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than BBD with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | +35.7% | 59.3% |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | +32.9% | 32.9% |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | +32.5% | 64.8% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | +31.6% | 33.9% |
| BLX Bladex, Inc. | +31.4% | 25.9% |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | +31.2% | 58.3% |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | +30.8% | 30.3% |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | +26.3% | 33.8% |
| BCH Banco de Chile | +25.2% | 28.2% |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | +24.1% | 71.2% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | +19.5% | 29.0% |
| EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | +14.9% | 27.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| BBD This pageBanco Bradesco S.A. | +11.1% | 39.3% |
| BBDO Banco Bradesco S.A. | +9.9% | 43.1% |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | +3.2% | 49.5% |
| XP XP Inc. | −0.2% | 51.5% |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | −0.5% | 34.4% |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | −18.0% | 65.1% |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | −19.8% | 60.6% |
Has BBD consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares BBD with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than BBD helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Four of the 20 popular alternatives, led by CIB, ITUB and BAP, outperformed BBD in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- CIB and ITUB outperformed BBD in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- BAP, BCH and ITUB earned more for the risk they took than BBD (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than BBD over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. (this page) | — | +18.3% | +15.9% | +1.7% | +29.1% | +31.6% | +90.7% | +69.3% | +35.5% | 39.3% | 0.47 | −67.7% | — | $43B | — |
| CIB QualifiedGrupo Cibest S.A. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | 0.0% | +20.5% | +32.5% | +59.5% | +81.1% | +398% | +314% | +345% | 32.9% | 1.03 | −70.4% | — | $23B | — |
| ITUB QualifiedItaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +14.8% | +16.7% | +5.8% | +37.2% | +46.3% | +147% | +221% | +190% | 33.8% | 0.86 | −62.1% | — | $107B | — |
| BAP QualifiedCredicorp Ltd. | 3/5 short3/3 long | +0.1% | +1.0% | +21.9% | +42.9% | +61.4% | +275% | +283% | +298% | 30.3% | 1.04 | −59.2% | — | $31B | — |
| EWZ QualifiediShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 4/5 short2/3 long | +12.8% | +21.0% | +5.0% | +34.6% | +48.5% | +70.8% | +100% | +90.3% | 27.7% | 0.64 | −57.0% | 0.59% | $14B | — |
| SAN Banks - DiversifiedBanco Santander, S.A. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −10.2% | −1.4% | +4.5% | +9.8% | +35.9% | +305% | +295% | +332% | 33.9% | 0.99 | −73.8% | — | $194B | — |
| BLX Banks - RegionalBladex, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | +1.8% | −4.2% | −0.3% | +32.2% | +29.9% | +201% | +292% | +290% | 25.9% | 1.19 | −68.5% | — | $1.6B | — |
| BCH Banks - RegionalBanco de Chile | 0/5 short3/3 long | −4.6% | −1.0% | −3.7% | +8.6% | +25.2% | +138% | +208% | +180% | 28.2% | 0.94 | −58.4% | — | $20B | — |
| BSAC Banks - RegionalBanco Santander-Chile | 0/5 short3/3 long | −4.1% | +0.2% | −2.0% | +11.4% | +24.0% | +124% | +144% | +154% | 29.0% | 0.76 | −63.9% | — | $16B | — |
| GGAL Banks - RegionalGrupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −15.0% | −28.7% | −24.7% | −31.9% | +14.1% | +254% | +288% | +48.4% | 58.3% | 0.75 | −91.7% | — | $6.0B | — |
| BBAR Banks - RegionalBanco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −12.5% | −35.9% | −24.8% | −29.0% | +35.7% | +283% | +309% | −13.5% | 64.8% | 0.75 | −91.6% | — | $2.6B | — |
| BMA Banks - RegionalBanco Macro S.A. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −15.8% | −30.1% | −22.1% | −25.9% | +25.7% | +297% | +360% | +14.9% | 59.3% | 0.81 | −91.7% | — | $4.0B | — |
| SUPV Banks - RegionalGrupo Supervielle S.A. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −10.5% | −25.9% | −27.9% | −37.9% | +16.3% | +274% | +194% | −48.9% | 71.2% | 0.65 | −96.0% | — | $676M | — |
| BBDO Banks - RegionalBanco Bradesco S.A. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +16.0% | +20.6% | +3.7% | +36.2% | +37.2% | +94.2% | +60.4% | −21.0% | 43.1% | 0.44 | −76.5% | — | $41B | — |
| MELI Specialty RetailMercadoLibre, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | +3.2% | +2.6% | +0.5% | −4.8% | −10.6% | +60.7% | +17.2% | +1,002% | 49.5% | 0.31 | −69.1% | — | $95B | — |
| XP Financial - Capital MarketsXP Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +50.8% | +86.5% | +52.5% | +96.2% | +83.7% | +64.5% | −0.9% | — | 51.5% | 0.25 | −79.2% | — | $16B | — |
| PAGS Specialty Business ServicesPagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +23.8% | +29.9% | +9.2% | +29.2% | +38.4% | +73.1% | −66.9% | — | 60.6% | -0.07 | −90.0% | — | $3.2B | — |
| INTR Banks - RegionalInter & Co, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +30.3% | +29.2% | −11.8% | −13.1% | −21.3% | +80.1% | — | — | — | — | −68.3% | — | $3.2B | — |
| STNE Software - InfrastructureStoneCo Ltd. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +24.3% | +8.5% | −5.1% | −0.6% | −21.7% | +46.8% | −63.0% | — | 65.1% | 0.02 | −92.3% | — | $2.8B | — |
| BSBR Banks - RegionalBanco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.4% | +6.0% | −10.8% | −6.8% | +6.6% | +18.6% | −2.6% | −1.2% | 34.4% | 0.16 | −70.6% | — | $42B | — |
| NU Banks - RegionalNu Holdings Ltd. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +7.3% | +7.9% | −0.1% | −11.3% | −2.1% | +84.7% | — | — | — | — | −72.1% | — | $73B | — |
How did BBD do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2002, along with where BBD ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with BBD and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, BBD finished in the top quarter in six of 24 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 4 of 21.
- BBD finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 12 of its 24 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, MELI came out ahead of BBD most often, in 12 of the 18 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of BBD; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places BBD among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of BBD | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBD This pageBanco Bradesco S.A. | — | +96.9% | −42.2% | +34.8% | −5.1% | −25.4% | −33.6% | +15.7% | +9.7% | +33.6% | +108% | −55.3% | +9.1% | −19.5% | +6.1% | −16.2% | +13.9% | +124% | −52.7% | +58.7% | +39.4% | +133% | +445% | +78.3% | −41.8% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 6 of 24 | 4 of 21 | 18 of 21 | 15 of 21 | 13 of 20 | 14 of 19 | 14 of 19 | 8 of 18 | 3 of 16 | 9 of 16 | 2 of 15 | 15 of 15 | 8 of 15 | 14 of 15 | 7 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 10 of 14 | 6 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 3 of 12 | 5 of 11 | 1 of 11 | 1 of 11 | 8 of 11 | 8 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 24 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | 13 of 24 | +122% | +13.6% | +20.6% | −2.0% | −20.8% | −22.6% | +47.2% | −0.8% | +11.4% | +41.9% | −42.2% | +0.4% | −24.2% | +14.7% | −1.5% | +39.4% | +102% | −28.9% | +12.8% | +10.9% | +109% | +176% | +138% | +60.1% |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 12 of 23 | +79.3% | −24.2% | +54.5% | +30.0% | −22.8% | −30.5% | +8.1% | +13.6% | +31.3% | +76.8% | −44.0% | +9.9% | −5.2% | −6.8% | −19.1% | +8.8% | +125% | −38.8% | +50.9% | +57.9% | +65.1% | +61.5% | +126% | — |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 14 of 24 | +65.4% | +31.4% | +16.3% | +14.6% | −24.7% | −17.7% | −0.3% | +9.0% | +37.8% | +64.9% | −38.4% | +22.3% | −7.9% | +36.3% | −6.0% | +57.5% | +58.9% | −33.2% | +91.0% | +86.8% | +50.5% | +22.0% | +51.8% | +5.5% |
| EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 11 of 24 | +48.8% | −30.4% | +32.6% | +12.1% | −17.3% | −20.3% | +27.7% | −2.5% | +23.6% | +64.5% | −41.8% | −15.5% | −17.5% | +0.3% | −24.1% | +7.8% | +122% | −56.0% | +74.8% | +43.3% | +52.7% | +33.6% | +117% | −36.4% |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 10 of 24 | +165% | +14.9% | +46.4% | −6.8% | +10.2% | −19.6% | −2.2% | −28.5% | +33.3% | +12.3% | −37.9% | −0.4% | +27.4% | +22.8% | −20.2% | −30.2% | +91.8% | −52.3% | +20.2% | +47.1% | +10.5% | +6.8% | +77.6% | −11.3% |
| BLX Bladex, Inc. | 14 of 24 | +33.1% | +53.7% | +60.6% | +4.3% | +11.6% | −19.4% | +33.0% | −31.3% | −3.4% | +20.6% | −10.3% | +14.2% | +36.5% | +41.6% | −9.1% | +38.7% | +2.5% | −7.3% | −0.5% | +3.0% | +3.7% | +12.3% | +324% | −83.8% |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 13 of 24 | +77.6% | +3.9% | +20.3% | +39.2% | −21.6% | +1.1% | −24.7% | −6.9% | +45.0% | +25.9% | −8.2% | −16.5% | −3.7% | +24.0% | −2.5% | +72.4% | +79.1% | −25.6% | −3.3% | +37.0% | +9.5% | +43.4% | +81.3% | −6.8% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 10 of 24 | +74.3% | +0.9% | +31.6% | +3.0% | −11.0% | −13.0% | −19.9% | −0.1% | +49.4% | +30.8% | −5.8% | −12.7% | −13.9% | +1.4% | −16.0% | +50.3% | +96.2% | −27.7% | +9.8% | +12.0% | +39.6% | +53.0% | +35.1% | −8.5% |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 13 of 24 | −11.4% | +289% | +92.3% | +7.3% | +9.5% | −45.6% | −40.4% | −57.9% | +145% | −0.3% | +70.8% | +52.5% | +58.8% | +12.4% | −61.1% | +166% | +155% | −70.2% | −20.7% | +38.3% | −19.4% | +27.3% | +234% | −36.9% |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 11 of 24 | −4.1% | +316% | +47.3% | +34.2% | −1.8% | −42.3% | −49.2% | −54.5% | +47.0% | −6.5% | +38.3% | +98.7% | +38.3% | +3.1% | −53.6% | +106% | +141% | −58.3% | −19.1% | +34.1% | −0.3% | −20.7% | +209% | −55.5% |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 10 of 19 | −3.6% | +266% | +84.9% | +26.5% | −10.0% | −57.0% | −14.1% | −60.7% | +81.5% | +12.2% | +32.9% | +86.4% | +33.8% | −7.0% | −58.8% | +74.0% | +183% | −54.5% | −19.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | 5 of 9 | −20.8% | +281% | +87.6% | +11.2% | −7.4% | −41.7% | −57.1% | −70.2% | +124% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BBDO Banco Bradesco S.A. | 5 of 13 | +79.3% | −40.2% | +37.2% | −8.5% | −34.6% | −45.6% | +25.7% | −3.0% | +8.7% | +81.6% | −49.0% | −4.0% | +2.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 12 of 18 | +18.4% | +8.2% | +85.7% | −37.2% | −19.5% | +193% | +95.3% | −6.9% | +102% | +37.1% | −10.1% | +19.2% | +38.0% | −0.7% | +19.9% | +28.5% | +216% | −77.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| XP XP Inc. | 2 of 6 | +39.6% | −52.3% | +79.6% | −46.6% | −27.6% | +3.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 3 of 7 | +61.0% | −49.8% | +42.7% | −66.7% | −53.9% | +66.5% | +82.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTR Inter & Co, Inc. | 3 of 3 | +104% | −23.6% | +134% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | 3 of 7 | +85.7% | −55.8% | +90.9% | −44.0% | −79.9% | +110% | +116% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 7 of 16 | +62.5% | −39.7% | +23.0% | +2.9% | −34.2% | −27.0% | +14.0% | +21.3% | +12.2% | +143% | −20.0% | −12.2% | −15.3% | −7.3% | −37.5% | +2.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | 2 of 4 | +61.6% | +24.4% | +105% | −56.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How BBD has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were BBD's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents BBD's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2001, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of BBD's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: BBD fell 73.4% from November 2010 to January 2016, while the S&P 500 rose 70.1%.
- The slowest recovery came after BBD fell 73.4% from November 2010 to January 2016; it did not regain that peak until January 2018, two years later.
Green means BBD fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | BBD fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −73.4% | +70.1% | Nov 2010 | Jan 2016 | 5.2 years | Jan 2018 | 2 years |
| Dot-com bust | −70.2% | −23.1% | Apr 2002 | Oct 2002 | 6 months | Jun 2004 | 20 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −69.0% | −46.1% | May 2008 | Nov 2008 | 6 months | Sep 2010 | 22 months |
| Covid crash | −67.7% | −4.2% | Jul 2019 | May 2020 | 10 months | Not yet | — |
| February 2018 volatility shock | −44.9% | −5.2% | Jan 2018 | Jun 2018 | 5 months | Jan 2019 | 7 months |
How did BBD do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far BBD, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: BBD began trading on November 21, 2001, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- BBD fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when BBD fell 44.3% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
- Among its popular alternatives, BLX held up best, falling less than BBD in seven of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- BBD began trading after the dot-com bust, but seven of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was BSAC's 28.0%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than BBD.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBD This pageBanco Bradesco S.A. | — | −6.9% | −30.2% | −54.5% | −7.6% | −6.3% | −44.3% | −25.1% | −0.8% | −69.0% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | 4 of 9 | −9.8% | −44.6% | −70.1% | −15.3% | −4.8% | −38.7% | −17.7% | −1.7% | −63.4% | −75.1% |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 2 of 9 | −8.1% | −31.5% | −46.3% | −7.5% | −5.8% | −32.4% | −30.1% | −0.7% | −69.2% | — |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 5 of 9 | −4.7% | −33.3% | −38.3% | −7.3% | −6.7% | −33.9% | −16.0% | −2.8% | −64.9% | −55.6% |
| EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 3 of 9 | −5.6% | −32.2% | −52.6% | −10.6% | −6.3% | −36.9% | −29.1% | −0.7% | −73.0% | — |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 1 of 9 | −11.4% | −41.0% | −48.1% | −19.0% | −6.0% | −44.7% | −33.2% | −0.9% | −76.1% | −58.4% |
| BLX Bladex, Inc. | 7 of 9 | −3.8% | −23.9% | −48.4% | −26.7% | −4.6% | −27.8% | −19.7% | −2.5% | −63.2% | −94.3% |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 6 of 9 | −2.1% | −27.0% | −29.8% | −10.5% | −2.7% | −15.2% | −25.4% | −1.4% | −57.6% | −37.3% |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 5 of 9 | −6.0% | −37.0% | −38.1% | −12.4% | −4.5% | −22.6% | −29.0% | −1.2% | −48.4% | −28.0% |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 1 of 9 | −14.5% | −44.7% | −58.1% | −27.3% | −8.5% | −22.1% | −47.8% | −1.5% | −82.4% | — |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 3 of 9 | −16.6% | −41.8% | −50.5% | −23.9% | −8.5% | −30.1% | −47.1% | 0.0% | −80.2% | −95.7% |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 1 of 9 | −11.1% | −41.2% | −55.7% | −26.4% | −6.3% | −27.9% | −48.1% | −0.5% | −77.5% | — |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | 0 of 5 | −12.1% | −39.8% | −54.4% | −29.4% | −7.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| BBDO Banco Bradesco S.A. | 0 of 6 | −6.8% | −36.3% | −55.6% | −9.3% | −8.8% | −44.1% | — | — | — | — |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 3 of 9 | −7.2% | −51.6% | −39.1% | −30.3% | −8.8% | −31.9% | −39.5% | 0.0% | −89.5% | — |
| XP XP Inc. | 0 of 3 | −15.3% | −52.4% | −60.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd. | 1 of 5 | −12.8% | −60.9% | −59.7% | −44.9% | −0.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| INTR Inter & Co, Inc. | 0 of 1 | −13.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| STNE StoneCo Ltd. | 0 of 3 | −10.2% | −59.0% | −55.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 2 of 8 | −8.6% | −37.6% | −50.4% | −13.9% | −6.2% | −31.4% | −30.5% | −4.0% | — | — |
| NU Nu Holdings Ltd. | 0 of 2 | −10.0% | −67.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does BBD move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares BBD with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Nine of the 15 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than BBD's 0.60, led by BCH, MELI and ITUB.
- ITUB took just 58% of the S&P 500's losses, against 103% for BBD, while still keeping 66% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, BBD captured 62% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 103% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.72. Its share of the market's losses was larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than BBD's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBD This pageBanco Bradesco S.A. | 62% | 103% | 0.60 | 0.72 |
| BCH Banco de Chile | 45% | 19% | 2.41 | 0.36 |
| MELI MercadoLibre, Inc. | 135% | 111% | 1.21 | 1.44 |
| ITUB Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. | 66% | 58% | 1.15 | 0.65 |
| SAN Banco Santander, S.A. | 101% | 92% | 1.10 | 1.02 |
| BAP Credicorp Ltd. | 88% | 82% | 1.07 | 0.88 |
| BLX Bladex, Inc. | 91% | 90% | 1.01 | 1.07 |
| BSAC Banco Santander-Chile | 66% | 65% | 1.01 | 0.66 |
| CIB Grupo Cibest S.A. | 119% | 133% | 0.90 | 0.99 |
| EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 69% | 95% | 0.73 | 0.83 |
| GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 140% | 234% | 0.60 | 1.52 |
| BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 113% | 202% | 0.56 | 1.36 |
| BSBR Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. | 56% | 102% | 0.55 | 0.74 |
| BBAR Banco BBVA Argentina S.A. | 98% | 191% | 0.51 | 1.14 |
| BBDO Banco Bradesco S.A. | 54% | 125% | 0.43 | 0.84 |
| SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | 95% | 224% | 0.42 | 1.51 |
What diversifies BBD?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with BBD's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing BBD with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in BBD into DXJ would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 19% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+7.8% for BBD alone, +12.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of BBD over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.25 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- DXJ made money in six of the nine calendar years in which BBD lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which BBD lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% BBD and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2015 | 2013 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. (this page) | 1.00 | +69.3% | 0.47 | −42.2% | −5.1% | −25.4% | −33.6% | −55.3% | −19.5% | −16.2% | −52.7% | −41.8% | 39.6% | +7.8% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.25 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +3.8% | +17.8% | −9.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 32.2% | +10.8% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.06 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +6.0% | +18.0% | +3.9% | +7.7% | +41.3% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | 32.0% | +12.8% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.25 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +10.4% | +23.1% | −13.4% | −25.3% | +16.6% | — | — | — | 32.6% | +10.6% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.29 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +14.1% | +7.1% | +19.6% | −6.5% | −0.3% | +23.8% | — | — | — | 32.6% | +9.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.11 | +323% | 0.97 | +39.1% | −33.5% | +42.1% | +55.5% | −0.3% | +33.4% | +6.8% | −44.7% | −47.0% | 33.2% | +15.3% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.16 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +13.4% | −5.1% | +19.6% | +2.1% | +4.1% | +26.4% | — | — | — | 32.1% | +10.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.16 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −0.8% | −4.2% | +24.8% | −10.7% | −28.3% | +9.6% | +4.9% | — | 32.4% | +11.2% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.10 | +136% | 0.93 | +45.8% | −10.4% | +22.7% | +28.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 32.4% | +12.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2015 | 2013 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBD Banco Bradesco S.A. (this page) | 1.00 | +69.3% | 0.47 | −42.2% | −5.1% | −25.4% | −33.6% | −55.3% | −19.5% | −16.2% | −52.7% | −41.8% | 39.6% | +7.8% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.29 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +54.1% | −0.4% | +10.1% | +12.6% | +66.0% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −8.3% | 33.6% | +14.7% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.10 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +1.3% | +37.9% | −2.4% | −6.0% | +27.6% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −65.1% | 34.8% | +27.5% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.08 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +107% | +17.0% | +89.0% | +6.7% | +67.7% | +61.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | −9.4% | 33.6% | +23.7% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.12 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +51.8% | +44.2% | +27.1% | −4.5% | +67.7% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | 32.7% | +14.4% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.20 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +86.6% | +61.0% | −27.4% | +17.4% | +48.6% | — | — | — | 33.6% | +16.8% |
Common questions
What was BBD's worst drawdown?
BBD's deepest decline since it began trading in 2001 was 73.4%, from November 2010 to January 2016. It took 24 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were BBD's best and worst years?
Over 24 full calendar years, BBD's best year was 2004, when it returned 445%. Its worst was 2015, with a return of -55.3%.
Is there a better investment than BBD?
Among BBD's popular alternatives, ITUB, BAP and EWZ earned more than BBD with less volatility over the past 5 years. ITUB returned 26.3% a year at 33.8% volatility, against 11.1% a year at 39.3%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RY (banks) and HSBC (banks) earned more than BBD with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 11.1% a year at 39.3%.
Is BBD more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. BBD's volatility over the past 5 years was 39.3%, 2.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BBD's return lands within 39.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is BBD's Sharpe ratio?
BBD's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.47, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BBD earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is BBD with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, BBD's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.19 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They are only loosely linked, which makes it a real diversifier next to an index fund. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BBD instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BBD holding.
What are the best alternatives to BBD?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, four outperformed BBD in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: CIB, ITUB and BAP.
Did BBD outperform the S&P 500?
BBD finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 12 of 24 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +96.9%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did BBD do in stock market crashes?
BBD fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the 2015 China and oil sell-off, when BBD fell 44.3% and the S&P 500 fell 12.8%.
What diversifies BBD?
These had a low correlation with BBD over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.25), DXJ (correlation 0.06) and EMLP (correlation 0.25); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.29), CLS (correlation 0.10) and FIX (correlation 0.08). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than BBD's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of BBD's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to BBD
ITUBItaú Unibanco Holding
SANBanco Santander
BBDOBanco Bradesco
MELIMercadoLibre
BSBRBanco Santander (Brasil)
NUNu