Relative Intelligence · Electronic Instruments

How AMETEK (AME) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on AME alone. It places AME (AMETEK, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where AME stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: AME's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowIts electronic instrument peers split over the past 6 months: IEX (IDEX) rose 14.1%, while HON (Honeywell International) fell 10.7%. AME has trailed the market, rising 4.8% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?AME held up far better than its industry: it rose 5.3% over the past 3 months while the electronic instruments ETF XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF) fell 6.1%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its electronic instrument peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: EMR (Emerson Electric) rose 17.9%, while COHR (Coherent) fell 18.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, AME rose 32.8% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termAME turned $10,000 into $58,100 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. AME's 10-year return of 481% puts it ahead of 85% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, AME has typically fallen 1.2 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAME is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.72 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.73 with the total US market, more closely than 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Over 10 years, AME's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.15: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.1 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.0 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- KEYS (Keysight Technologies) was ahead of AME in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (34.5% volatility against 22.1%).
- Nearby categories and themes
- WAB (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, industrial machinery) was ahead of AME in most short and long periods.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 34 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than AME with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVS (Novartis), RY (Royal Bank of Canada) and TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank).
How much would $10,000 in AME have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in AME over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of AME over the same span and AME's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in AME at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $869,262 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of AME, and AAPL finished highest, at $20,534,853.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 41 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AME; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- ROK$1M+12,857% total · +18.3% a year
- ASML$984,088+9,741% total · +17.1% a year
- COHR$922,472+9,125% total · +16.9% a year
- AME$869,262+8,593% total · +16.6% a year
- ETN$538,468+5,285% total · +14.7% a year
- PH$505,227+4,952% total · +14.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- EMR$115,655+1,057% total · +8.8% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 735 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AME; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BELFB$203,703+1,937% total · +82.7% a year
- LLY$52,411+424% total · +39.3% a year
- COHR$48,485+385% total · +37.1% a year
- MTSI$43,907+339% total · +34.4% a year
- WAB$34,242+242% total · +27.9% a year
- COR$26,420+164% total · +21.4% a year
- RY$23,646+136% total · +18.8% a year
- KEYS$22,159+122% total · +17.2% a year
- AME$20,638+106% total · +15.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
AME at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- AME's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 53.3%, from June 2008 to March 2009. It took 19 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, AME's best was 2010, when it returned 54.8%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 35.1%. It lost money in six of those years.
- AME is 4.2% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $57B
- Industry
- Electrical Equipment & Parts
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +32.8%total return
- Past 3 years
- +78.1%+21.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +96.1%+14.4% a year
- Past 10 years
- +481%+19.2% a year
- Best calendar year
- +54.8%2010
- Worst calendar year
- −35.1%2008
- Losing years
- 6 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 22.1%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.72return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −53.3%Jun 2008 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −4.2%below the peak
AME against the whole market
Where AME ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does AME rank among all stocks?
This section ranks AME on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how AME stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- AME is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 5% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | AME | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +32.8% | 897 of 3,287 | top 27% |
| 3-year return | +78.1% | 1,152 of 3,017 | top 38% |
| 5-year return | +96.1% | 705 of 2,893 | top 24% |
| 10-year return | +481% | 324 of 2,202 | top 15% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 22.1% | 154 of 2,893 | top 5% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.72 | 417 of 2,893 | top 14% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −42.7% | 219 of 2,187 | top 10% |
What has beaten AME on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). AME sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than AME with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Seven stocks and 27 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than AME over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half AME's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 50% less than AME's 22.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.72 for AME. DXJ earned the most, 26.6% a year, while still swinging less than AME (19.1% against 22.1%).
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to AME; faint dots are 19 more of the 34 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than AME?
Investments that beat AME over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among AME's popular alternatives, KEYS was ahead of AME in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (34.5% volatility against 22.1%).
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WAB (industrial machinery) was ahead of AME in most short and long periods.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 34 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than AME with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them NVS, RY and TD.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat AME over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks AME's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than AME follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than AME's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× AME's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than AME's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with AME?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.72 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 1 shownThe investments people most often weigh against AME. 1 of 25 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +13.9% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | +923% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 1 shownEverything else in Electronic Instruments and the categories next to it (Industrial Machinery, Electronic Equipment, Electrical Equipment), plus AME's specific themes. 1 of 42 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.64 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 200 of 3,566 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.16 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.36 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.44 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.46 | 0.48% | |
NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.57 | 0.70% | |
MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.20 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.20 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.43 | — | ||
What these numbers mean for AME
- Annual return
- AME returned 14.4% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $19,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- AME's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.1%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AME's return lands within 22.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- AME's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.72, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AME earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- AME's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 42.7%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 42.7% fall takes a 74.6% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, AME's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.72 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AME instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AME holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 34 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than AME with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 23 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with AME | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.36 | — | |
| 2 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.46 | 0.48% |
| 3 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.57 | 0.70% |
| 4 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.42 | — | |
| 5 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.50 | 0.40% |
| 6 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.25 | — | |
| 7 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | -0.03 | 0.80% |
| 8 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.09 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.61 | 0.15% |
| 10 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.60 | 0.13% |
| 11 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.63 | 0.40% |
| 12 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.27 | 0.61% |
| 13 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.38 | — | |
| 14 | FFLCFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +15.7% | 16.8% | 0.95 | −19.7% | — | 0.72 | 0.38% |
| 15 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.55 | 0.45% |
| 16 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.28 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.30 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.29 | — | |
| 19 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.72 | 0.56% |
| 20 | AMLPAlerian MLP ETF · Energy Equity | Whole market | +16.1% | 18.9% | 0.89 | −72.9% | +91.0% | 0.35 | 1.01% |
| 21 | PPAInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETF · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 18.9% | 0.90 | −43.9% | +344% | 0.59 | 0.58% |
| 22 | MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy | Whole market | +18.6% | 19.7% | 0.97 | −64.6% | +186% | 0.42 | 0.45% |
| 23 | EWPiShares MSCI Spain ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +19.2% | 20.3% | 0.97 | −46.4% | +196% | 0.41 | 0.50% |
AME against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against AME, compared period by period and year by year.
How do AME's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at AME, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 25 popular alternatives earned more than AME over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 18 of the 25 popular alternatives earned less than AME over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, AME returned 14.4% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (22.1% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than AME with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | +78.0% | 52.1% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | +32.0% | 47.3% |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | +31.6% | 66.3% |
| PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | +27.4% | 28.8% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | +20.4% | 32.1% |
| OSIS OSI Systems, Inc. | +15.5% | 34.0% |
| AME This pageAMETEK, Inc. | +14.4% | 22.1% |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | +13.9% | 34.5% |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | +12.7% | 27.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| CTS CTS Corporation | +11.7% | 33.9% |
| MKSI MKS Inc. | +8.5% | 53.4% |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | +7.8% | 32.3% |
| TDY Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | +7.5% | 24.5% |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | +6.7% | 21.4% |
| BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | +5.2% | 35.0% |
| DOV Dover Corporation | +4.4% | 25.1% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | +2.9% | 27.8% |
| IEX IDEX Corporation | +2.7% | 24.0% |
| ITRI Itron, Inc. | +1.6% | 42.4% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | +1.5% | 22.8% |
| FTV Fortive Corporation | +1.2% | 25.5% |
| VNT Vontier Corporation | +0.1% | 30.9% |
| ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. | −2.8% | 22.7% |
| NOVT Novanta Inc. | −3.7% | 41.4% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | −3.8% | 29.1% |
| ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | −4.8% | 37.4% |
Has AME consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares AME with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than AME helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 25 popular alternatives, KEYS, outperformed AME in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- ETN outperformed AME over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so AME has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than AME over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| AME AMETEK, Inc. (this page) | — | +2.5% | +5.3% | +4.8% | +18.8% | +32.8% | +78.1% | +96.1% | +481% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | — | $57B | — |
| KEYS QualifiedKeysight Technologies, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | −2.3% | +6.4% | −0.3% | +61.8% | +103% | +172% | +91.9% | +923% | 34.5% | 0.55 | −42.6% | — | $57B | — |
| BELFB Hardware, Equipment & PartsBel Fuse Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −12.7% | −20.2% | −16.5% | +23.1% | +43.7% | +425% | +1,688% | +872% | 52.1% | 1.37 | −79.8% | — | $2.6B | — |
| MTSI SemiconductorsMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | −5.8% | −2.5% | −6.5% | +50.3% | +87.4% | +249% | +302% | +588% | 47.3% | 0.83 | −80.8% | — | $20B | — |
| COHR Hardware, Equipment & PartsCoherent, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −27.9% | −18.8% | −33.3% | +19.3% | +92.8% | +648% | +295% | +795% | 66.3% | 0.75 | −72.2% | — | $46B | — |
| PH Industrial - MachineryParker-Hannifin Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | −1.4% | −0.4% | −4.8% | +6.3% | +28.7% | +161% | +235% | +789% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | — | $119B | — |
| ETN Electrical Equipment & PartsEaton Corporation plc | 0/5 short3/3 long | −12.3% | −4.6% | −5.8% | +17.7% | +2.3% | +104% | +153% | +657% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | — | $148B | — |
| EMR Industrial - MachineryEmerson Electric Co. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +5.8% | +17.9% | +10.1% | +19.5% | +25.0% | +84.9% | +82.1% | +309% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | — | $90B | — |
| TDY Hardware, Equipment & PartsTeledyne Technologies Incorporated | 2/5 short1/3 long | +3.7% | +0.8% | −2.2% | +21.8% | +10.5% | +62.6% | +43.7% | +499% | 24.5% | 0.42 | −48.9% | — | $29B | — |
| MKSI Hardware, Equipment & PartsMKS Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −17.8% | −34.8% | −24.4% | +25.7% | +49.8% | +191% | +50.5% | +371% | 53.4% | 0.42 | −69.2% | — | $14B | — |
| NOVT Hardware, Equipment & PartsNovanta Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +1.0% | −5.5% | +2.5% | +22.0% | +25.0% | +0.2% | −17.3% | +673% | 41.4% | 0.12 | −46.7% | — | $5.1B | — |
| OSIS Hardware, Equipment & PartsOSI Systems, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −2.8% | −7.4% | −37.0% | −23.8% | −23.3% | +69.6% | +106% | +194% | 34.0% | 0.59 | −53.6% | — | $3.1B | — |
| IEX Industrial - MachineryIDEX Corporation | 4/5 short0/3 long | +5.1% | +5.7% | +14.1% | +32.0% | +41.9% | +26.1% | +14.1% | +205% | 24.0% | 0.23 | −35.5% | — | $17B | — |
| TMO Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchThermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +4.3% | +30.7% | +30.9% | +16.3% | +26.8% | +49.5% | +15.1% | +366% | 27.8% | 0.24 | −40.9% | — | $254B | — |
| DHR Medical - Diagnostics & ResearchDanaher Corporation | 3/5 short0/3 long | +4.0% | +11.6% | +15.0% | −2.2% | +8.3% | +10.8% | −17.6% | +232% | 29.1% | 0.01 | −43.8% | — | $157B | — |
| ROP Software - ApplicationRoper Technologies, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +9.3% | +10.0% | +11.2% | −7.7% | −20.5% | −15.6% | −13.3% | +145% | 22.7% | -0.01 | −46.5% | — | $39B | — |
| CTS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCTS Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −5.6% | −6.5% | +1.0% | +26.4% | +34.6% | +42.6% | +74.1% | +252% | 33.9% | 0.50 | −52.6% | — | $1.6B | — |
| ST Hardware, Equipment & PartsSensata Technologies Holding plc | 2/5 short0/3 long | +0.4% | −5.5% | +3.6% | +21.5% | +33.9% | +23.3% | −21.6% | +19.7% | 37.4% | 0.06 | −71.7% | — | $6.1B | — |
| VNT Hardware, Equipment & PartsVontier Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +8.8% | +14.2% | −8.9% | −9.9% | −20.8% | +14.1% | +0.4% | — | 30.9% | 0.16 | −54.5% | — | $4.6B | — |
| BMI Industrial - MachineryBadger Meter, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.9% | −12.7% | +14.5% | −26.2% | −30.4% | −3.4% | +29.1% | +346% | 35.0% | 0.33 | −55.1% | — | $3.7B | — |
| DOV Industrial - MachineryDover Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +5.9% | −5.7% | −10.7% | +1.5% | +17.9% | +51.3% | +24.2% | +320% | 25.1% | 0.30 | −45.2% | — | $27B | — |
| ITW Industrial - MachineryIllinois Tool Works Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +3.5% | +1.9% | +2.1% | +12.3% | +11.7% | +32.1% | +38.4% | +208% | 21.4% | 0.41 | −37.9% | — | $78B | — |
| HON ConglomeratesHoneywell International Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +3.3% | −5.4% | −10.7% | +5.2% | +6.8% | +27.0% | +7.5% | +160% | 22.8% | 0.18 | −43.0% | — | $68B | — |
| FTV Hardware, Equipment & PartsFortive Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | +5.9% | −4.2% | −4.1% | +5.7% | +18.9% | +11.7% | +6.3% | +98.0% | 25.5% | 0.18 | −52.6% | — | $18B | — |
| ROK Industrial - MachineryRockwell Automation, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | +0.7% | −6.4% | +4.1% | +8.4% | +22.9% | +68.9% | +45.6% | +335% | 32.3% | 0.40 | −45.1% | — | $48B | — |
| ITRI Hardware, Equipment & PartsItron, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.5% | +0.3% | −13.3% | −10.4% | −36.9% | +47.7% | +8.3% | +54.5% | 42.4% | 0.25 | −65.3% | — | $3.7B | — |
How did AME do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where AME ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with AME and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- AME finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 17 of its 29 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, AME finished in the top quarter in ten of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 10 of 26.
- Among its popular alternatives, MTSI came out ahead of AME most often, in nine of the 13 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of AME; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places AME among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of AME | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AME This pageAMETEK, Inc. | — | +14.7% | +10.0% | +18.8% | −4.3% | +22.3% | +22.2% | +48.3% | −5.9% | +50.0% | −8.6% | +2.5% | +0.5% | +41.0% | +34.6% | +7.9% | +54.8% | +27.6% | −35.1% | +47.9% | +13.0% | +20.0% | +48.9% | +26.4% | +21.4% | +23.7% | +37.7% | −13.6% | −16.8% | +22.4% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 10 of 29 | 10 of 26 | 13 of 26 | 15 of 26 | 7 of 26 | 10 of 26 | 14 of 25 | 8 of 25 | 11 of 25 | 4 of 25 | 22 of 24 | 8 of 24 | 17 of 23 | 11 of 23 | 3 of 22 | 5 of 22 | 5 of 21 | 14 of 21 | 11 of 21 | 4 of 21 | 17 of 21 | 5 of 21 | 4 of 21 | 16 of 21 | 2 of 21 | 6 of 21 | 7 of 21 | 16 of 18 | 9 of 17 | 11 of 16 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | 6 of 11 | +26.5% | +1.0% | −7.0% | −17.2% | +56.3% | +28.7% | +65.3% | +49.2% | +13.8% | +29.1% | −16.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 10 of 27 | +106% | +24.0% | +104% | +159% | −12.3% | −24.9% | +13.1% | −25.9% | −17.7% | +81.6% | −35.9% | +29.9% | +10.9% | +5.9% | −20.4% | +12.8% | +3.0% | −26.7% | −15.3% | +10.0% | −5.3% | +4.2% | +64.0% | −19.2% | −25.7% | +43.2% | +41.0% | — | — |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 9 of 13 | +31.8% | +39.8% | +47.6% | −19.6% | +42.3% | +107% | +83.3% | −55.4% | −29.7% | +13.2% | +30.7% | +84.1% | +13.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +94.8% | +118% | +24.0% | −48.6% | −10.1% | +126% | +3.7% | −30.9% | +58.4% | +59.8% | +36.0% | −22.4% | −3.6% | +5.4% | −20.8% | +45.8% | +66.5% | −37.5% | +9.3% | +56.3% | −15.8% | +64.8% | +60.6% | −6.9% | +13.4% | +51.0% | +156% | −67.2% | −8.4% |
| PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 13 of 29 | +39.5% | +39.6% | +60.8% | −6.9% | +18.3% | +34.8% | +40.7% | −24.0% | +44.3% | +47.6% | −23.1% | +2.0% | +53.9% | +13.7% | −10.1% | +62.7% | +29.4% | −42.5% | +48.6% | +18.0% | −11.8% | +28.9% | +31.2% | +2.1% | +5.7% | −12.5% | +59.3% | −27.5% | +80.2% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 13 of 29 | −2.8% | +39.5% | +56.2% | −7.2% | +46.7% | +31.0% | +42.8% | −10.0% | +21.5% | +33.8% | −20.7% | −8.2% | +44.2% | +28.6% | −11.8% | +64.0% | +33.3% | −47.1% | +31.6% | +14.4% | −5.4% | +36.5% | +41.1% | +7.6% | +40.8% | +6.0% | +5.3% | −19.0% | +30.7% |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 9 of 29 | +8.9% | +29.7% | +3.8% | +5.7% | +18.2% | +8.6% | +31.6% | −11.9% | +29.1% | +21.0% | −19.7% | −9.6% | +36.1% | +17.3% | −16.3% | +37.8% | +20.7% | −33.6% | +31.5% | +20.7% | +9.2% | +11.0% | +31.4% | −8.3% | −25.7% | +40.8% | −3.0% | +9.2% | +19.1% |
| TDY Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | 9 of 26 | +10.0% | +4.0% | +11.6% | −8.5% | +11.5% | +13.1% | +67.3% | +14.3% | +47.3% | +38.7% | −13.7% | +11.8% | +41.2% | +18.6% | +24.7% | +14.6% | −13.9% | −16.5% | +32.9% | +37.9% | −1.1% | +56.1% | +20.2% | −3.8% | −31.1% | +150% | — | — | — |
| MKSI MKS Inc. | 12 of 26 | +54.4% | +2.2% | +22.6% | −51.0% | +16.4% | +37.7% | +71.9% | −31.1% | +60.5% | +67.6% | +0.3% | +24.9% | +18.8% | −5.1% | +16.3% | +40.7% | +17.7% | −22.7% | −15.2% | +26.2% | −3.6% | −36.0% | +76.6% | −39.2% | +74.4% | −57.1% | — | — | — |
| NOVT Novanta Inc. | 10 of 26 | −22.1% | −9.3% | +23.9% | −22.9% | +49.1% | +33.7% | +40.4% | +26.0% | +138% | +54.2% | −7.5% | +31.0% | +29.8% | −15.3% | −3.3% | +305% | +52.6% | −93.8% | −4.6% | −10.8% | −5.4% | −2.5% | +95.2% | −28.8% | +5.9% | −8.6% | — | — | — |
| OSIS OSI Systems, Inc. | 10 of 28 | +52.3% | +29.7% | +62.3% | −14.7% | 0.0% | −7.5% | +37.4% | +13.9% | −15.4% | −14.1% | +25.3% | +33.3% | −17.1% | +31.3% | +34.2% | +33.3% | +97.0% | −47.7% | +26.5% | +13.8% | −19.0% | +18.2% | +13.1% | −6.9% | +198% | +11.5% | −36.3% | −29.5% | — |
| IEX IDEX Corporation | 11 of 29 | −13.7% | −2.4% | −3.8% | −2.2% | +19.8% | +17.2% | +37.9% | −3.2% | +48.5% | +19.5% | 0.0% | +7.0% | +61.3% | +27.9% | −3.5% | +27.8% | +31.5% | −32.1% | +15.8% | +16.8% | +2.7% | +48.2% | +29.3% | −3.6% | +6.1% | +11.2% | +26.6% | −28.5% | +33.4% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 12 of 29 | +11.8% | −1.7% | −3.4% | −17.3% | +43.5% | +43.7% | +45.6% | +18.2% | +35.0% | −0.1% | +13.8% | +13.1% | +75.8% | +43.2% | −18.8% | +16.1% | +40.0% | −40.9% | +27.4% | +50.3% | −0.2% | +19.8% | +25.3% | −15.7% | +5.6% | +98.2% | −11.4% | −61.5% | +6.7% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 13 of 29 | +0.4% | −0.4% | −1.2% | −19.0% | +48.6% | +45.4% | +49.5% | +11.8% | +20.0% | +73.2% | +9.3% | +11.6% | +38.3% | +19.1% | −0.1% | +25.7% | +33.0% | −35.4% | +21.3% | +30.1% | −2.7% | +25.3% | +39.7% | +9.1% | −11.7% | +41.5% | −11.0% | +72.4% | +35.2% |
| ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. | 13 of 29 | −13.9% | −4.1% | +26.9% | −11.6% | +14.7% | +22.4% | +33.7% | +3.5% | +42.4% | −2.9% | +22.1% | +13.4% | +24.9% | +29.3% | +14.3% | +46.9% | +21.5% | −30.2% | +25.1% | +27.8% | +30.8% | +24.3% | +35.8% | −25.4% | +51.0% | −11.8% | +87.4% | −27.1% | +45.1% |
| CTS CTS Corporation | 11 of 29 | −18.4% | +20.9% | +11.4% | +7.8% | +7.5% | +15.2% | +16.6% | +1.1% | +15.8% | +28.1% | −0.2% | −9.6% | +89.3% | +17.3% | −15.7% | +16.4% | +77.8% | −43.8% | −36.2% | +43.2% | −15.9% | +16.7% | +50.2% | −50.5% | −56.0% | −51.5% | +248% | +37.3% | +126% |
| ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | 2 of 15 | +23.6% | −26.1% | −5.8% | −34.0% | +17.0% | −2.1% | +20.1% | −12.3% | +31.2% | −15.4% | −12.1% | +35.2% | +19.4% | +23.6% | −12.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VNT Vontier Corporation | 1 of 5 | +2.2% | +5.8% | +79.3% | −36.8% | −7.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | 16 of 29 | −17.2% | +38.3% | +42.6% | +3.2% | +14.1% | +46.4% | +33.4% | +4.1% | +30.9% | +27.7% | 0.0% | +10.4% | +16.6% | +64.2% | −32.3% | +12.6% | +39.0% | −34.7% | +64.1% | +42.8% | +33.3% | +60.4% | +22.8% | +48.5% | +1.0% | −21.3% | −13.2% | −10.9% | +116% |
| DOV Dover Corporation | 12 of 29 | +5.2% | +23.4% | +15.2% | −24.3% | +45.7% | +11.5% | +65.8% | −11.0% | +37.7% | +25.4% | −12.4% | −8.8% | +49.5% | +15.7% | +1.4% | +43.7% | +30.3% | −26.9% | −4.4% | +22.9% | −1.8% | +7.2% | +38.7% | −20.1% | −7.3% | −9.7% | +25.4% | +2.5% | +44.6% |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 10 of 29 | −0.4% | −1.0% | +21.6% | −8.5% | +23.6% | +16.4% | +45.6% | −22.1% | +38.9% | +35.0% | +0.1% | +15.0% | +41.4% | +33.6% | −10.0% | +14.4% | +41.4% | −32.7% | +18.0% | +7.1% | −3.7% | +11.7% | +31.1% | −2.9% | +15.2% | −10.6% | +17.6% | −2.6% | +51.9% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 10 of 29 | −6.3% | +10.2% | +0.1% | +5.0% | −0.2% | +23.1% | +36.9% | −7.5% | +35.2% | +14.3% | +4.9% | +10.6% | +45.8% | +18.5% | +3.8% | +37.8% | +21.9% | −45.9% | +37.5% | +23.1% | +6.6% | +7.3% | +41.6% | −28.0% | −27.7% | −17.2% | +31.0% | +15.1% | +16.7% |
| FTV Fortive Corporation | 0 of 9 | −1.9% | +2.3% | +15.1% | −15.4% | +8.1% | +11.2% | +13.3% | −6.1% | +35.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +38.4% | −6.2% | +22.6% | −24.8% | +41.2% | +26.2% | +37.9% | −21.8% | +48.9% | +34.5% | −5.5% | −3.9% | +43.8% | +17.2% | +4.5% | +56.1% | +50.9% | −51.9% | +14.9% | +4.7% | +21.3% | +41.8% | +76.5% | +20.0% | −11.3% | +5.5% | +168% | −1.9% | +37.1% |
| ITRI Itron, Inc. | 10 of 29 | −14.5% | +43.8% | +49.1% | −26.1% | −28.5% | +14.2% | +77.5% | −30.7% | +8.5% | +73.7% | −14.4% | +2.1% | −7.0% | +24.6% | −35.5% | −17.9% | +6.0% | −33.6% | +85.1% | +29.5% | +67.5% | +30.2% | −4.2% | −36.7% | +735% | −40.8% | −14.7% | −60.1% | +1.4% |
Risk and diversification
How AME has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were AME's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents AME's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of AME's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: AME fell 47.5% from July 1998 to March 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 17.3%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 19 months, after AME fell 53.3% from June 2008 to March 2009.
Green means AME fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | AME fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −53.3% | −48.9% | Jun 2008 | Mar 2009 | 9 months | Oct 2010 | 19 months |
| No named crash | −49.6% | — | Oct 1987 | Sep 1990 | 2.9 years | Feb 1992 | 17 months |
| Dot-com bust | −47.5% | +17.3% | Jul 1998 | Mar 2000 | 20 months | Jun 2001 | 15 months |
| Covid crash | −42.7% | −30.9% | Jan 2020 | Mar 2020 | 2 months | Aug 2020 | 5 months |
| No named crash | −36.2% | +3.1% | Mar 1993 | Nov 1993 | 8 months | Sep 1994 | 10 months |
How did AME do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far AME, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, DHR held up best, falling less than AME in eight of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- AME fell further than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when AME fell 30.3% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than AME.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AME This pageAMETEK, Inc. | — | −3.7% | −26.4% | −42.0% | −22.1% | −6.7% | −21.9% | −30.3% | −1.2% | −53.3% | −34.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | 3 of 6 | −2.6% | −33.8% | −17.7% | −18.0% | −6.7% | −37.2% | — | — | — | — |
| BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 1 of 10 | −13.5% | −24.7% | −55.1% | −34.7% | −9.3% | −39.1% | −34.6% | −5.1% | −73.6% | −57.0% |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −4.8% | −43.9% | −48.1% | −37.0% | −41.5% | −22.4% | — | — | — | — |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −10.7% | −56.3% | −43.0% | −39.5% | −9.8% | −15.0% | −40.4% | −2.1% | −68.2% | −61.4% |
| PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0 of 10 | −8.4% | −27.3% | −54.7% | −25.6% | −8.1% | −23.7% | −30.4% | −3.5% | −66.9% | −36.5% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1 of 10 | −4.5% | −26.3% | −44.5% | −26.0% | −6.7% | −22.3% | −34.6% | −1.4% | −68.5% | −31.6% |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 5 of 10 | −4.3% | −25.4% | −47.2% | −28.8% | −5.9% | −15.9% | −25.8% | 0.0% | −56.1% | −43.6% |
| TDY Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | 1 of 10 | −5.0% | −32.0% | −48.9% | −22.7% | −7.6% | −27.5% | −16.5% | −5.1% | −66.2% | −59.5% |
| MKSI MKS Inc. | 3 of 10 | −6.5% | −57.1% | −39.4% | −31.8% | −9.5% | −14.4% | −23.9% | −3.4% | −54.7% | −85.7% |
| NOVT Novanta Inc. | 2 of 10 | −4.0% | −36.2% | −29.5% | −25.6% | −12.6% | −19.6% | −38.9% | −0.7% | −96.0% | −91.4% |
| OSIS OSI Systems, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −3.7% | −30.4% | −40.4% | −13.7% | −3.7% | −45.7% | −28.9% | −2.5% | −61.4% | −88.4% |
| IEX IDEX Corporation | 4 of 10 | −2.0% | −26.1% | −34.3% | −23.8% | −7.9% | −13.1% | −33.3% | −3.3% | −58.3% | −33.9% |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 6 of 10 | −2.4% | −19.8% | −24.8% | −17.2% | −8.7% | −14.7% | −24.4% | −3.6% | −53.9% | −41.8% |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 8 of 10 | −3.2% | −22.8% | −25.9% | −13.4% | −9.8% | −14.0% | −21.8% | −0.6% | −45.7% | −33.7% |
| ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. | 7 of 10 | −1.0% | −25.8% | −34.4% | −19.2% | −9.0% | −18.3% | −24.3% | −0.9% | −50.0% | −46.8% |
| CTS CTS Corporation | 4 of 10 | −1.2% | −20.6% | −38.5% | −33.7% | −7.5% | −34.2% | −26.4% | −5.1% | −84.2% | −94.3% |
| ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | 1 of 8 | −7.8% | −42.4% | −52.4% | −20.6% | −7.1% | −41.4% | −33.6% | −4.0% | — | — |
| VNT Vontier Corporation | 0 of 2 | −8.2% | −45.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −3.5% | −29.3% | −39.0% | −17.5% | −4.1% | −12.9% | −28.3% | −2.8% | −68.2% | −42.4% |
| DOV Dover Corporation | 1 of 10 | −5.9% | −35.6% | −45.0% | −25.1% | −6.8% | −20.9% | −32.8% | −1.5% | −58.2% | −54.1% |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 6 of 10 | −2.9% | −28.0% | −37.9% | −19.3% | −8.4% | −14.0% | −29.0% | −1.1% | −54.9% | −30.8% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 4 of 10 | −1.4% | −22.7% | −42.2% | −22.1% | −6.8% | −14.4% | −25.3% | −1.8% | −62.2% | −65.8% |
| FTV Fortive Corporation | 0 of 5 | −4.7% | −27.4% | −45.3% | −26.8% | −8.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −5.4% | −43.8% | −42.4% | −27.5% | −7.9% | −23.6% | −37.5% | −1.4% | −74.7% | −42.0% |
| ITRI Itron, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −3.8% | −39.4% | −51.5% | −32.5% | −7.2% | −19.2% | −44.1% | −2.6% | −68.5% | −64.7% |
How closely does AME move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares AME with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- KEYS took just 71% of the S&P 500's losses, against 101% for AME, while still keeping 121% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, AME captured 111% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 101% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.15. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Six of the 24 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than AME's 1.10, led by KEYS, BMI and ETN.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than AME's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AME This pageAMETEK, Inc. | 111% | 101% | 1.10 | 1.15 |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies, Inc. | 121% | 71% | 1.70 | 1.08 |
| BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | 73% | 50% | 1.46 | 0.71 |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 114% | 80% | 1.43 | 1.16 |
| TDY Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | 101% | 81% | 1.24 | 1.02 |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 162% | 146% | 1.11 | 1.80 |
| PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 141% | 126% | 1.11 | 1.43 |
| BELFB Bel Fuse Inc. | 168% | 160% | 1.05 | 1.61 |
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 84% | 84% | 1.01 | 0.75 |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 104% | 104% | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| NOVT Novanta Inc. | 155% | 156% | 0.99 | 1.38 |
| MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 148% | 157% | 0.94 | 1.93 |
| CTS CTS Corporation | 94% | 104% | 0.91 | 0.87 |
| OSIS OSI Systems, Inc. | 88% | 99% | 0.89 | 0.97 |
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 122% | 138% | 0.88 | 1.46 |
| MKSI MKS Inc. | 156% | 181% | 0.86 | 1.77 |
| DOV Dover Corporation | 114% | 133% | 0.85 | 1.27 |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 124% | 153% | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 94% | 116% | 0.81 | 1.04 |
| IEX IDEX Corporation | 97% | 121% | 0.80 | 1.03 |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 90% | 118% | 0.77 | 1.00 |
| ROP Roper Technologies, Inc. | 79% | 107% | 0.74 | 0.91 |
| FTV Fortive Corporation | 88% | 133% | 0.66 | 1.10 |
| ITRI Itron, Inc. | 97% | 158% | 0.61 | 1.27 |
| ST Sensata Technologies Holding plc | 85% | 157% | 0.54 | 1.33 |
What diversifies AME?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with AME's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing AME with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in AME into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 17% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+15.6% for AME alone, +16.7% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, FDL and EWP have moved largely independently of AME over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- Among large stocks, CAH, CLS and MCK have moved largely independently of AME over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.44 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which AME lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% AME and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2016 | 2008 | 1999 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AME AMETEK, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +96.1% | 0.72 | −4.3% | −5.9% | −8.6% | −35.1% | −13.6% | −16.8% | 20.7% | +15.6% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.46 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +1.1% | −20.8% | — | — | 17.9% | +18.1% |
| FDL Dividend & IncomeFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 0.48 | +91.8% | 0.98 | +6.7% | −6.0% | +20.7% | −31.1% | — | — | 18.3% | +15.5% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.41 | +140% | 0.97 | −5.2% | −15.3% | −1.8% | −36.8% | −1.5% | +50.5% | 18.4% | +17.0% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.42 | +135% | 0.97 | +21.5% | −15.5% | +36.3% | — | — | — | 18.5% | +16.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.09 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | +8.0% | +4.9% | — | — | 17.3% | +16.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.25 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | +28.0% | −39.0% | +18.1% | — | 18.6% | +17.8% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.35 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −12.6% | +14.9% | — | — | — | 18.2% | +16.6% |
| EFV InternationaliShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 0.49 | +89.0% | 0.88 | −5.2% | −14.7% | +5.1% | −41.7% | — | — | 18.3% | +15.6% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2016 | 2008 | 1999 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AME AMETEK, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +96.1% | 0.72 | −4.3% | −5.9% | −8.6% | −35.1% | −13.6% | −16.8% | 20.7% | +15.6% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.39 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | −17.5% | −39.6% | −36.8% | +51.7% | 19.3% | +20.4% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.44 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | +7.4% | −20.5% | +350% | — | 24.1% | +33.0% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.30 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −28.3% | −40.4% | −71.3% | +46.9% | 18.8% | +19.8% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.15 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +0.7% | — | — | — | 18.7% | +22.7% |
| ATI Manufacturing - Metal FabricationATI Inc. | 0.35 | +1,008% | 1.34 | +87.5% | −9.8% | +43.9% | −70.0% | — | — | 21.8% | +25.6% |
Common questions
What was AME's worst drawdown?
AME's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 53.3%, from June 2008 to March 2009. It took 19 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were AME's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, AME's best year was 2010, when it returned 54.8%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -35.1%.
Is there a better investment than AME?
Among AME's popular alternatives, KEYS was ahead of AME in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (34.5% volatility against 22.1%). Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WAB (industrial machinery) was ahead of AME in most short and long periods.
Is AME more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. AME's volatility over the past 5 years was 22.1%, 1.3 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AME's return lands within 22.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is AME's Sharpe ratio?
AME's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.72, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AME earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is AME with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, AME's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.72 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AME instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AME holding.
What are the best alternatives to AME?
Of the 25 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed AME in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: KEYS.
Did AME outperform the S&P 500?
AME finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 17 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +14.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did AME do in stock market crashes?
AME fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when AME fell 30.3% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
What diversifies AME?
These had a low correlation with AME over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.46), FDL (correlation 0.48) and EWP (correlation 0.41); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.39), CLS (correlation 0.44) and MCK (correlation 0.30). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than AME's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of AME's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to AME
KEYSKeysight Technologies
COHRCoherent
PHParker-Hannifin
ETNEaton
EMREmerson Electric
TMOThermo Fisher Scientific
DHRDanaher
ROPRoper Technologies
ITWIllinois Tool Works
HONHoneywell International
ROKRockwell Automation