Relative Intelligence · Industrial Machinery

How Rockwell Automation (ROK) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on ROK alone. It places ROK (Rockwell Automation, Inc.) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where ROK stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: ROK's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, ROK fell 6.4% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, EMR (Emerson Electric) rose 17.9% and ATS fell 29.7%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?ROK's 6.4% fall over the past 3 months is part of a broader industrial machinery sell-off: the industrial machinery ETF XLI (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF) fell 6.1%, with ETN (Eaton, down 4.6%) and HON (Honeywell International, down 5.4%). Its industrial machinery peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: EMR (Emerson Electric) rose 17.9%, while ATS fell 29.7%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsROK has outpaced the market, rising 22.9% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. ROK lagged its industrial machinery peers in 2023, then moved up the pack in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termThe past 5 years only trailed the S&P 500 (45.6% against 81.7%), after a much stronger decade (335% against 321%). Even so, ROK turned $10,000 into $43,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, ROK has typically fallen 1.5 times as far as the S&P 500. In the 2022 bear market, ROK fell 43.8%, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than ETN (Eaton, 26.2%) but less than TER (Teradyne, 56.6%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationROK is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.70 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.72 with the total US market, more closely than 99% of stocks worth at least $300 million. ROK fell in 17 of the 22 months the S&P 500 fell over the past 5 years: it usually fell with it. By year ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- PH (Parker-Hannifin), AME (AMETEK) and EMR (Emerson Electric) earned more than ROK with less volatility over the past 5 years. PH returned 27.4% a year at 28.8% volatility, against 7.8% a year at 32.3%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- FAST (Fastenal, industrial distribution) and DE (Deere & Company, industrial machinery) earned more than ROK with less volatility over the past 5 years. FAST returned 15.8% a year at 24.6% volatility, against 7.8% a year at 32.3%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 7.8% at 32.3% for ROK.
How much would $10,000 in ROK have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in ROK over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of ROK over the same span and ROK's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in ROK at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $1,295,740 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of ROK, and MNST finished highest, at $45,663,831.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 26 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ROK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MNST$46M+456,538% total · +33.7% a year
- AAPL$21M+205,249% total · +30.1% a year
- AMZN$11M+114,749% total · +27.5% a year
- ESLT$2M+16,428% total · +19.3% a year
- GILD$2M+15,614% total · +19.1% a year
- ROK$1M+12,857% total · +18.3% a year
- AME$869,262+8,593% total · +16.6% a year
- ADI$385,909+3,759% total · +13.4% a year
- TER$161,859+1,519% total · +10.1% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,370 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of ROK; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- TER$37,422+274% total · +30.2% a year
- PH$36,392+264% total · +29.5% a year
- ETN$31,102+211% total · +25.5% a year
- ADI$25,751+158% total · +20.8% a year
- AME$20,638+106% total · +15.6% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- EMR$18,174+81.7% total · +12.7% a year
- ROK$16,096+61.0% total · +10.0% a year
- ZBRA$7,243−27.6% total · −6.2% a year
- GNRC$5,064−49.4% total · −12.7% a year
ROK at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- ROK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 75.8%, from April 2006 to March 2009. It took 21 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, ROK's best was 1999, when it returned 168%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 51.9%. It lost money in eight of those years.
- ROK is 13.3% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $48B
- Industry
- Industrial - Machinery
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +22.9%total return
- Past 3 years
- +68.9%+19.1% a year
- Past 5 years
- +45.6%+7.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +335%+15.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +168%1999
- Worst calendar year
- −51.9%2008
- Losing years
- 8 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 32.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.40return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −75.8%Apr 2006 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −13.3%below the peak
ROK against the whole market
Where ROK ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does ROK rank among all stocks?
This section ranks ROK on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how ROK stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- ROK's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 13% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | ROK | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +22.9% | 1,158 of 3,287 | top 35% |
| 3-year return | +68.9% | 1,278 of 3,017 | top 42% |
| 5-year return | +45.6% | 1,139 of 2,893 | top 39% |
| 10-year return | +335% | 510 of 2,202 | top 23% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 32.3% | 941 of 2,893 | top 33% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.40 | 1,243 of 2,893 | top 43% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −45.1% | 291 of 2,187 | top 13% |
What has beaten ROK on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). ROK sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than ROK with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 317 stocks and 417 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than ROK over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 20% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half ROK's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 23% less than ROK's 32.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.40 for ROK.
- Among ROK's popular alternatives, PH, AME and EMR are in the region. PH earned 27.4% a year against 7.8% a year for ROK, at 28.8% volatility, 11% less than ROK's 32.3%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to ROK; faint dots are 90 more of the 734 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than ROK?
Investments that beat ROK over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among ROK's popular alternatives, PH, AME and EMR earned more than ROK with less volatility over the past 5 years. PH returned 27.4% a year at 28.8% volatility, against 7.8% a year at 32.3%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, FAST (industrial distribution) and DE (industrial machinery) earned more than ROK with less volatility over the past 5 years. FAST returned 15.8% a year at 24.6% volatility, against 7.8% a year at 32.3%.
- Simply owning the S&P 500 would have done better over the past 5 years: 12.7% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 7.8% at 32.3% for ROK.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat ROK over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks ROK's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than ROK follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than ROK's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× ROK's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than ROK's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with ROK?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +7.8% | 32.3% | 0.40 | −45.1% | +335% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.70 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against ROK. 8 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.51 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +27.4% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | +789% | 0.66 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.74 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +12.7% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | +309% | 0.63 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +20.4% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | +657% | 0.59 | — | ||
NOVTNovanta Inc. · Electronic Equipment | Smaller losses in recent crashes | −3.7% | 41.4% | 0.12 | −46.7% | +673% | 0.69 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Industrial Machinery and the categories next to it (Infrastructure, Electrical Equipment, Aerospace & Defense, Industrial Distribution), plus ROK's specific themes. 46 of 100 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.37 | — | ||
ESLTElbit Systems Ltd. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +39.8% | 34.6% | 1.15 | −35.4% | +765% | 0.06 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.62 | — | ||
MOG-AMoog Inc. · Aerospace & Defense | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +36.6% | 32.0% | 1.14 | −63.7% | +595% | 0.53 | — | |
NDSNNordson Corporation · Industrial Machinery | Similar return, lower volatility | +7.1% | 25.2% | 0.40 | −44.2% | +262% | 0.65 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 1,197 of 3,514 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.33 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.37 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.67 | 0.18% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.65 | 0.09% | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.00 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.16 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.08 | — | ||
IPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF · International | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +8.2% | 16.9% | 0.55 | −31.0% | +126% | 0.48 | 0.09% | |
What these numbers mean for ROK
- Annual return
- ROK returned 7.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $14,600. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- ROK's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.3%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ROK's return lands within 32.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- ROK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.40, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ROK earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- ROK's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 45.1%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 45.1% fall takes a 82.1% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, ROK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.70 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ROK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ROK holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 734 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than ROK with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with ROK | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +12.5% | 28.2% | 0.56 | −37.1% | +946% | 0.33 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.37 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.67 | 0.18% | |
| 4 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.65 | 0.09% | |
| 5 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.00 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.16 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.26 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.36 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.66 | 0.04% | |
| 10 | Whole market | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.48 | — | |
| 11 | OEFiShares S&P 100 ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.8% | 0.84 | −31.4% | +367% | 0.67 | 0.20% |
| 12 | EXPDExpeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Freight & Logistics | Whole market | +12.0% | 27.1% | 0.56 | −35.6% | +349% | 0.42 | — |
| 13 | Whole market | +11.5% | 17.5% | 0.71 | −35.0% | +302% | 0.72 | 0.03% | |
| 14 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.43 | 0.59% |
| 15 | MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +10.9% | 22.1% | 0.58 | −34.1% | +336% | 0.63 | 0.15% |
| 16 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.63 | 0.40% |
| 17 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.32 | — | |
| 18 | Same or nearby category | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.37 | — | |
| 19 | NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Whole market | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.24 | — |
| 20 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.65 | 0.40% |
| 21 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.56 | 0.50% |
| 22 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.17 | — | |
| 23 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.34 | 0.48% |
| 24 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.34 | 0.40% |
| 25 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.18 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.09 | — | |
| 27 | PWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.8% | 22.2% | 0.74 | −32.4% | +409% | 0.69 | 0.55% |
| 28 | ILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.2% | 22.4% | 0.59 | −35.4% | +403% | 0.70 | 0.04% |
| 29 | Whole market | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.57 | 0.03% | |
| 30 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.03 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.19 | — | |
| 32 | FXLFirst Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund · Technology | Whole market | +11.0% | 26.2% | 0.53 | −38.5% | +523% | 0.64 | 0.60% |
| 33 | BFCBank First Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 27.3% | 0.78 | −39.8% | +496% | 0.38 | — |
| 34 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.65 | 0.19% |
| 35 | Whole market | +11.3% | 13.8% | 0.85 | −35.2% | +208% | 0.55 | 0.04% | |
| 36 | Whole market | +12.2% | 29.0% | 0.54 | −37.5% | +464% | 0.09 | — | |
| 37 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.42 | — | |
| 38 | Whole market | +10.3% | 16.2% | 0.69 | −34.2% | +223% | 0.66 | 0.06% | |
| 39 | Whole market | +12.4% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | +541% | 0.37 | — | |
| 40 | Whole market | +13.3% | 30.0% | 0.57 | −39.2% | +711% | 0.38 | — | |
| 41 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.36 | — | |
| 42 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.38 | 0.27% |
| 43 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.66 | 0.15% |
| 44 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.15 | — | |
| 45 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.34 | 0.08% |
| 46 | DGXQuest Diagnostics Incorporated · Medical Diagnostics | Whole market | +12.3% | 22.5% | 0.63 | −36.6% | +243% | 0.29 | — |
| 47 | SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +12.0% | 16.7% | 0.76 | −31.6% | +300% | 0.67 | 0.20% |
| 48 | PKGPackaging Corporation of America · Packaging | Whole market | +15.4% | 25.8% | 0.69 | −38.2% | +294% | 0.34 | — |
| 49 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.49 | — | |
| 50 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.64 | 0.39% |
| 51 | CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity | Whole market | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.46 | 0.58% |
| 52 | BBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.3% | 18.6% | 0.57 | −32.7% | — | 0.45 | 0.19% |
| 53 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.58 | 0.35% |
| 54 | EHCEncompass Health Corporation · Health Care Facilities | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.8% | 0.77 | −39.5% | +340% | 0.21 | — |
| 55 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | -0.05 | — | |
| 56 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.68 | 0.12% |
| 57 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.59 | 0.15% |
| 58 | VPLVanguard FTSE Pacific ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +9.5% | 18.6% | 0.58 | −33.9% | +141% | 0.49 | 0.07% |
| 59 | Same or nearby category | +14.4% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −37.9% | +755% | 0.47 | — | |
| 60 | FNDESchwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF · Emerging Markets Equity | Whole market | +9.8% | 17.0% | 0.64 | −39.9% | +151% | 0.30 | 0.39% |
| 61 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Whole market | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.14 | — |
| 62 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.20 | — |
| 63 | Whole market | +11.5% | 20.9% | 0.63 | −32.6% | +394% | 0.42 | — | |
| 64 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.43 | 0.19% |
| 65 | Whole market | +8.9% | 24.7% | 0.47 | −38.3% | +407% | 0.40 | — | |
| 66 | QTUMDefiance Quantum ETF · Technology | Whole market | +22.8% | 28.1% | 0.87 | −38.5% | — | 0.59 | 0.40% |
| 67 | RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Whole market | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.47 | — |
| 68 | TSPAT. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.1% | 17.1% | 0.81 | −24.7% | — | 0.70 | 0.34% |
| 69 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.31 | — | |
| 70 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.69 | 0.45% |
| 71 | NWENorthwestern Energy Group Inc · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +10.3% | 21.6% | 0.57 | −39.3% | +104% | 0.13 | — |
| 72 | HDEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +12.8% | 14.2% | 0.92 | −36.4% | +134% | 0.31 | 0.09% |
| 73 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.58 | 0.05% |
| 74 | FVFirst Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.7% | 21.1% | 0.55 | −34.0% | +247% | 0.65 | 0.30% |
| 75 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.26 | — | |
| 76 | JMOMJPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.9% | 19.1% | 0.73 | −34.3% | — | 0.72 | 0.12% |
| 77 | Same or nearby category | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.62 | — | |
| 78 | HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF · Technology | Whole market | +12.6% | 25.8% | 0.59 | −38.7% | +373% | 0.48 | 0.60% |
| 79 | Whole market | +9.3% | 19.2% | 0.56 | −30.1% | +344% | 0.33 | — | |
| 80 | NULVNuveen ESG Large-Cap Value · Broad Market | Whole market | +9.2% | 14.2% | 0.69 | −37.0% | — | 0.58 | 0.26% |
| 81 | FBTFirst Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund · Healthcare | Whole market | +10.8% | 22.2% | 0.58 | −33.3% | +203% | 0.48 | 0.55% |
| 82 | CHCOCity Holding Company · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 22.8% | 0.77 | −32.3% | +286% | 0.45 | — |
| 83 | QUSState Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.1% | 14.2% | 0.81 | −33.8% | +273% | 0.63 | 0.15% |
| 84 | Whole market | +27.1% | 26.5% | 1.04 | −61.0% | +214% | 0.00 | — | |
| 85 | CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc. · Convenience Stores | Whole market | +29.9% | 29.3% | 1.04 | −36.1% | +537% | 0.26 | — |
| 86 | FVALFidelity Value Factor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.4% | 16.4% | 0.80 | −37.3% | +291% | 0.65 | 0.15% |
| 87 | Whole market | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.43 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.09 | — | |
| 89 | IGROiShares International Dividend Growth ETF · International | Whole market | +9.0% | 14.0% | 0.69 | −36.3% | +141% | 0.41 | 0.15% |
| 90 | DUSADavis Select U.S. Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +11.3% | 18.4% | 0.68 | −36.7% | — | 0.55 | 0.59% |
| 91 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.69 | 0.50% |
| 92 | Whole market | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.19 | — | |
| 93 | IDHQInvesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF · International | Whole market | +10.0% | 17.9% | 0.63 | −33.6% | +183% | 0.53 | 0.29% |
| 94 | DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF · International | Whole market | +13.8% | 15.1% | 0.94 | −34.4% | +261% | 0.52 | 0.50% |
| 95 | SIXAETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.8% | 12.7% | 1.01 | −18.4% | — | 0.53 | 0.31% |
| 96 | QDEFNorthern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +12.7% | 13.7% | 0.94 | −35.7% | +228% | 0.64 | 0.40% |
| 97 | FIVAFidelity International Value Factor ETF · International | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.4% | 0.84 | −39.7% | — | 0.46 | 0.18% |
| 98 | DJDInvesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +11.8% | 13.3% | 0.91 | −34.7% | +227% | 0.47 | 0.07% |
| 99 | NICNicolet Bankshares, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +19.0% | 30.1% | 0.73 | −44.3% | +344% | 0.36 | — |
| 100 | Whole market | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.27 | — |
ROK against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against ROK, compared period by period and year by year.
How do ROK's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at ROK, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Four of the 19 popular alternatives, led by PH, ETN and AME, were both more rewarding and calmer than ROK over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, ROK returned 7.8% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (32.3% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than ROK with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| SYM Symbotic Inc. | +32.0% | 105% |
| PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | +27.4% | 28.8% |
| TER Teradyne, Inc. | +24.0% | 54.3% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | +20.4% | 32.1% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | +19.5% | 34.1% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | +14.4% | 22.1% |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | +12.7% | 27.7% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| PTC PTC Inc. | +8.3% | 35.0% |
| ROK This pageRockwell Automation, Inc. | +7.8% | 32.3% |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | +6.7% | 21.4% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | +5.7% | 42.3% |
| DOV Dover Corporation | +4.4% | 25.1% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | +1.5% | 22.8% |
| NOVT Novanta Inc. | −3.7% | 41.4% |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | −3.8% | 36.4% |
| ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corporation | −6.1% | 42.7% |
| CGNX Cognex Corporation | −7.1% | 45.1% |
| ATS ATS Corporation | −11.7% | 41.9% |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | −15.7% | 54.5% |
| AZTA Azenta, Inc. | −19.6% | 53.2% |
Has ROK consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares ROK with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than ROK helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Five of the 19 popular alternatives, led by ADI, AME and TER, outperformed ROK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- ADI and AME outperformed ROK in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- ETN, AME and ADI earned more for the risk they took than ROK (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than ROK over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. (this page) | — | +0.7% | −6.4% | +4.1% | +8.4% | +22.9% | +68.9% | +45.6% | +335% | 32.3% | 0.40 | −45.1% | — | $48B | — |
| ADI QualifiedAnalog Devices, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +3.7% | +6.9% | +4.8% | +46.3% | +63.3% | +150% | +144% | +652% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | — | $192B | — |
| AME QualifiedAMETEK, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | +2.5% | +5.3% | +4.8% | +18.8% | +32.8% | +78.1% | +96.1% | +481% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | — | $57B | — |
| TER QualifiedTeradyne, Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −11.8% | +0.9% | −10.2% | +62.4% | +142% | +271% | +193% | +1,565% | 54.3% | 0.67 | −59.1% | — | $53B | — |
| ZBRA QualifiedZebra Technologies Corporation | 5/5 short2/3 long | +9.5% | +45.1% | +61.9% | +54.7% | +27.4% | +87.8% | −27.1% | +488% | 42.7% | 0.06 | −67.8% | — | $18B | — |
| EMR QualifiedEmerson Electric Co. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +5.8% | +17.9% | +10.1% | +19.5% | +25.0% | +84.9% | +82.1% | +309% | 27.7% | 0.57 | −50.8% | — | $90B | — |
| PH Industrial - MachineryParker-Hannifin Corporation | 2/5 short3/3 long | −1.4% | −0.4% | −4.8% | +6.3% | +28.7% | +161% | +235% | +789% | 28.8% | 0.99 | −54.7% | — | $119B | — |
| ETN Electrical Equipment & PartsEaton Corporation plc | 2/5 short3/3 long | −12.3% | −4.6% | −5.8% | +17.7% | +2.3% | +104% | +153% | +657% | 32.1% | 0.74 | −44.5% | — | $148B | — |
| GNRC Industrial - MachineryGenerac Holdings Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −5.1% | −8.7% | −10.4% | +37.9% | −0.6% | +120% | −57.5% | +430% | 54.5% | -0.04 | −83.8% | — | $11B | — |
| PTC Software - ApplicationPTC Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +42.9% | +54.9% | +37.4% | +13.7% | −6.1% | +40.4% | +49.3% | +317% | 35.0% | 0.40 | −54.4% | — | $21B | — |
| NOVT Hardware, Equipment & PartsNovanta Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +1.0% | −5.5% | +2.5% | +22.0% | +25.0% | +0.2% | −17.3% | +673% | 41.4% | 0.12 | −46.7% | — | $5.1B | — |
| SYM Industrial - MachinerySymbotic Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −9.7% | −2.8% | −39.1% | −38.8% | −43.7% | −4.1% | +300% | — | 105% | 0.73 | −72.5% | — | $24B | — |
| ITW Industrial - MachineryIllinois Tool Works Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +3.5% | +1.9% | +2.1% | +12.3% | +11.7% | +32.1% | +38.4% | +208% | 21.4% | 0.41 | −37.9% | — | $78B | — |
| AZTA Medical - Instruments & SuppliesAzenta, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +5.9% | +36.1% | +35.3% | +7.0% | +13.2% | −28.0% | −66.4% | +189% | 53.2% | -0.14 | −87.1% | — | $1.6B | — |
| DOV Industrial - MachineryDover Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | +5.9% | −5.7% | −10.7% | +1.5% | +17.9% | +51.3% | +24.2% | +320% | 25.1% | 0.30 | −45.2% | — | $27B | — |
| ADSK Software - ApplicationAutodesk, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +12.2% | +12.8% | +0.1% | −14.4% | −20.3% | +21.2% | −17.8% | +245% | 36.4% | 0.07 | −52.0% | — | $51B | — |
| HON ConglomeratesHoneywell International Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +3.3% | −5.4% | −10.7% | +5.2% | +6.8% | +27.0% | +7.5% | +160% | 22.8% | 0.18 | −43.0% | — | $68B | — |
| NXPI SemiconductorsNXP Semiconductors N.V. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +2.2% | −10.7% | +8.2% | +8.8% | +10.0% | +34.9% | +31.9% | +159% | 42.3% | 0.34 | −53.3% | — | $60B | — |
| CGNX Hardware, Equipment & PartsCognex Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −8.4% | −9.9% | +2.6% | +54.4% | +20.8% | +59.1% | −30.8% | +130% | 45.1% | 0.06 | −74.6% | — | $9.6B | — |
| ATS Industrial - MachineryATS Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.4% | −29.7% | −43.5% | −33.0% | −29.8% | −47.3% | −46.4% | +119% | 41.9% | -0.09 | −64.6% | — | $1.8B | — |
How did ROK do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where ROK ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with ROK and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, ROK finished in the top quarter in nine of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in one. In 2025, it ranked 4 of 20.
- ROK finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 19 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, GNRC came out ahead of ROK most often, in ten of the 15 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of ROK; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places ROK among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of ROK | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROK This pageRockwell Automation, Inc. | — | +38.4% | −6.2% | +22.6% | −24.8% | +41.2% | +26.2% | +37.9% | −21.8% | +48.9% | +34.5% | −5.5% | −3.9% | +43.8% | +17.2% | +4.5% | +56.1% | +50.9% | −51.9% | +14.9% | +4.7% | +21.3% | +41.8% | +76.5% | +20.0% | −11.3% | +5.5% | +168% | −1.9% | +37.1% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 29 | 4 of 20 | 14 of 20 | 12 of 20 | 13 of 20 | 9 of 19 | 13 of 19 | 16 of 19 | 14 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 9 of 19 | 15 of 19 | 10 of 19 | 12 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 5 of 17 | 4 of 16 | 12 of 16 | 8 of 16 | 10 of 16 | 1 of 16 | 4 of 16 | 5 of 16 | 2 of 16 | 11 of 16 | 5 of 16 | 3 of 15 | 7 of 15 | 5 of 15 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 14 of 29 | +29.8% | +8.8% | +23.4% | −4.9% | +21.0% | +26.9% | +41.3% | −1.6% | +25.3% | +35.0% | +2.4% | +12.2% | +24.7% | +21.2% | −2.4% | +22.7% | +71.5% | −38.0% | −1.5% | −6.7% | −1.9% | −18.7% | +91.4% | −46.2% | −13.3% | +10.1% | +197% | +13.3% | +8.9% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 15 of 29 | +14.7% | +10.0% | +18.8% | −4.3% | +22.3% | +22.2% | +48.3% | −5.9% | +50.0% | −8.6% | +2.5% | +0.5% | +41.0% | +34.6% | +7.9% | +54.8% | +27.6% | −35.1% | +47.9% | +13.0% | +20.0% | +48.9% | +26.4% | +21.4% | +23.7% | +37.7% | −13.6% | −16.8% | +22.4% |
| TER Teradyne, Inc. | 13 of 29 | +54.4% | +16.5% | +24.8% | −46.4% | +36.8% | +76.8% | +119% | −24.4% | +65.8% | +24.3% | +5.8% | +13.4% | +4.3% | +23.9% | −2.9% | +30.9% | +154% | −59.1% | −30.9% | +2.7% | −14.7% | −32.9% | +95.6% | −56.8% | −19.1% | −43.6% | +211% | +32.5% | +31.3% |
| ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corporation | 8 of 29 | −37.1% | +41.3% | +6.6% | −56.9% | +54.9% | +50.5% | +60.4% | +53.4% | +21.0% | +23.1% | −10.0% | +43.1% | +37.6% | +9.9% | −5.8% | +34.0% | +39.9% | −41.6% | −0.3% | −18.8% | −23.9% | +27.2% | +73.7% | +3.2% | +36.1% | −30.3% | +103% | −3.3% | +27.2% |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 8 of 29 | +8.9% | +29.7% | +3.8% | +5.7% | +18.2% | +8.6% | +31.6% | −11.9% | +29.1% | +21.0% | −19.7% | −9.6% | +36.1% | +17.3% | −16.3% | +37.8% | +20.7% | −33.6% | +31.5% | +20.7% | +9.2% | +11.0% | +31.4% | −8.3% | −25.7% | +40.8% | −3.0% | +9.2% | +19.1% |
| PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 15 of 29 | +39.5% | +39.6% | +60.8% | −6.9% | +18.3% | +34.8% | +40.7% | −24.0% | +44.3% | +47.6% | −23.1% | +2.0% | +53.9% | +13.7% | −10.1% | +62.7% | +29.4% | −42.5% | +48.6% | +18.0% | −11.8% | +28.9% | +31.2% | +2.1% | +5.7% | −12.5% | +59.3% | −27.5% | +80.2% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 14 of 29 | −2.8% | +39.5% | +56.2% | −7.2% | +46.7% | +31.0% | +42.8% | −10.0% | +21.5% | +33.8% | −20.7% | −8.2% | +44.2% | +28.6% | −11.8% | +64.0% | +33.3% | −47.1% | +31.6% | +14.4% | −5.4% | +36.5% | +41.1% | +7.6% | +40.8% | +6.0% | +5.3% | −19.0% | +30.7% |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | 10 of 15 | −12.0% | +20.0% | +28.4% | −71.4% | +54.8% | +126% | +102% | +0.4% | +21.6% | +36.9% | −36.3% | −17.4% | +118% | +162% | +73.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 11 of 29 | −5.3% | +5.1% | +45.8% | −0.9% | +1.3% | +59.7% | −9.7% | +36.4% | +31.3% | +33.6% | −5.5% | +3.6% | +57.2% | +23.3% | −18.9% | +37.9% | +29.2% | −29.1% | −0.9% | +18.2% | +3.6% | +49.4% | +56.4% | −67.7% | −41.9% | −50.3% | +66.6% | −31.4% | −7.8% |
| NOVT Novanta Inc. | 13 of 26 | −22.1% | −9.3% | +23.9% | −22.9% | +49.1% | +33.7% | +40.4% | +26.0% | +138% | +54.2% | −7.5% | +31.0% | +29.8% | −15.3% | −3.3% | +305% | +52.6% | −93.8% | −4.6% | −10.8% | −5.4% | −2.5% | +95.2% | −28.8% | +5.9% | −8.6% | — | — | — |
| SYM Symbotic Inc. | 3 of 4 | +151% | −53.8% | +330% | +19.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 11 of 29 | −0.4% | −1.0% | +21.6% | −8.5% | +23.6% | +16.4% | +45.6% | −22.1% | +38.9% | +35.0% | +0.1% | +15.0% | +41.4% | +33.6% | −10.0% | +14.4% | +41.4% | −32.7% | +18.0% | +7.1% | −3.7% | +11.7% | +31.1% | −2.9% | +15.2% | −10.6% | +17.6% | −2.6% | +51.9% |
| AZTA Azenta, Inc. | 10 of 29 | −33.5% | −23.2% | +11.9% | −43.5% | +52.6% | +63.1% | +62.0% | +11.2% | +42.0% | +65.2% | −13.2% | +25.7% | +34.6% | −18.8% | +15.2% | +5.8% | +47.5% | −56.0% | −8.3% | +14.9% | −27.2% | −27.5% | +107% | −71.8% | +44.9% | −13.8% | +123% | −20.4% | +12.2% |
| DOV Dover Corporation | 10 of 29 | +5.2% | +23.4% | +15.2% | −24.3% | +45.7% | +11.5% | +65.8% | −11.0% | +37.7% | +25.4% | −12.4% | −8.8% | +49.5% | +15.7% | +1.4% | +43.7% | +30.3% | −26.9% | −4.4% | +22.9% | −1.8% | +7.2% | +38.7% | −20.1% | −7.3% | −9.7% | +25.4% | +2.5% | +44.6% |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 11 of 29 | +0.1% | +21.4% | +30.3% | −33.5% | −7.9% | +66.4% | +42.6% | +22.7% | +41.6% | +21.5% | +1.5% | +19.4% | +42.4% | +16.6% | −20.6% | +50.3% | +29.3% | −60.5% | +23.0% | −5.8% | +13.2% | +210% | +73.0% | −22.5% | +39.5% | −19.5% | −20.3% | +16.3% | +33.0% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 11 of 29 | −6.3% | +10.2% | +0.1% | +5.0% | −0.2% | +23.1% | +36.9% | −7.5% | +35.2% | +14.3% | +4.9% | +10.6% | +45.8% | +18.5% | +3.8% | +37.8% | +21.9% | −45.9% | +37.5% | +23.1% | +6.6% | +7.3% | +41.6% | −28.0% | −27.7% | −17.2% | +31.0% | +15.1% | +16.7% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 7 of 15 | +6.4% | −8.0% | +48.4% | −29.2% | +44.8% | +26.6% | +75.7% | −37.0% | +19.5% | +16.3% | +10.3% | +66.3% | +74.5% | +71.2% | −26.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CGNX Cognex Corporation | 11 of 29 | +1.2% | −13.4% | −10.8% | −39.1% | −2.9% | +47.7% | +45.5% | −36.5% | +92.9% | +89.5% | −17.9% | +8.3% | +107% | +7.1% | +22.8% | +68.0% | +22.5% | −24.5% | −14.2% | −19.7% | +9.1% | −0.7% | +54.2% | −28.0% | +15.6% | −43.2% | +95.1% | −26.7% | +46.9% |
| ATS ATS Corporation | 8 of 16 | −9.6% | −29.2% | +39.3% | −22.1% | +128% | +5.6% | +55.4% | −10.5% | +27.4% | +14.0% | −38.3% | +3.2% | +45.7% | +46.7% | −10.2% | −6.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How ROK has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were ROK's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents ROK's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all four of ROK's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: ROK fell 52.9% from July 1999 to September 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 4.5%.
- The slowest recovery came after ROK fell 52.9% from July 1999 to September 2000; it did not regain that peak until June 2003, three years later.
Green means ROK fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | ROK fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −75.8% | −44.4% | Apr 2006 | Mar 2009 | 2.9 years | Dec 2010 | 21 months |
| Dot-com bust | −52.9% | +4.5% | Jul 1999 | Sep 2000 | 14 months | Jun 2003 | 2.8 years |
| No named crash | −49.7% | — | Mar 1987 | Oct 1987 | 7 months | Oct 1989 | 2 years |
| 2011 euro debt crisis | −46.7% | −15.4% | Apr 2011 | Sep 2011 | 5 months | Jul 2013 | 22 months |
| 2022 bear market | −45.1% | −21.4% | Dec 2021 | Jun 2022 | 6 months | Jul 2023 | 13 months |
How did ROK do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far ROK, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- ROK fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when ROK fell 37.5% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
- Among its popular alternatives, ADI held up best, falling less than ROK in eight of the ten crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than ROK.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROK This pageRockwell Automation, Inc. | — | −5.4% | −43.8% | −42.4% | −27.5% | −7.9% | −23.6% | −37.5% | −1.4% | −74.7% | −42.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 8 of 10 | −2.6% | −22.6% | −33.6% | −18.1% | −7.2% | −22.7% | −18.6% | −1.2% | −55.0% | −82.0% |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 8 of 10 | −3.7% | −26.4% | −42.0% | −22.1% | −6.7% | −21.9% | −30.3% | −1.2% | −53.3% | −34.9% |
| TER Teradyne, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −1.9% | −56.6% | −34.8% | −24.6% | −10.7% | −18.3% | −28.2% | −2.5% | −79.2% | −93.4% |
| ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corporation | 5 of 10 | −7.2% | −57.5% | −33.5% | −21.7% | −6.0% | −50.5% | −33.0% | −3.0% | −57.9% | −45.7% |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 7 of 10 | −4.3% | −25.4% | −47.2% | −28.8% | −5.9% | −15.9% | −25.8% | 0.0% | −56.1% | −43.6% |
| PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 5 of 10 | −8.4% | −27.3% | −54.7% | −25.6% | −8.1% | −23.7% | −30.4% | −3.5% | −66.9% | −36.5% |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 8 of 10 | −4.5% | −26.3% | −44.5% | −26.0% | −6.7% | −22.3% | −34.6% | −1.4% | −68.5% | −31.6% |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | 5 of 8 | −6.8% | −54.8% | −33.1% | −21.8% | −5.6% | −16.2% | −24.4% | −4.0% | — | — |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 5 of 10 | −4.3% | −20.4% | −45.3% | −27.8% | −4.9% | −24.9% | −33.9% | −3.0% | −66.1% | −94.5% |
| NOVT Novanta Inc. | 6 of 10 | −4.0% | −36.2% | −29.5% | −25.6% | −12.6% | −19.6% | −38.9% | −0.7% | −96.0% | −91.4% |
| SYM Symbotic Inc. | 0 of 2 | −8.2% | −49.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 8 of 10 | −2.9% | −28.0% | −37.9% | −19.3% | −8.4% | −14.0% | −29.0% | −1.1% | −54.9% | −30.8% |
| AZTA Azenta, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −6.4% | −62.8% | −44.8% | −34.0% | −13.5% | −28.2% | −29.5% | 0.0% | −82.3% | −90.0% |
| DOV Dover Corporation | 6 of 10 | −5.9% | −35.6% | −45.0% | −25.1% | −6.8% | −20.9% | −32.8% | −1.5% | −58.2% | −54.1% |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 5 of 10 | −5.1% | −40.9% | −35.5% | −24.2% | −6.9% | −34.7% | −36.9% | −1.6% | −76.9% | −63.6% |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 7 of 10 | −1.4% | −22.7% | −42.2% | −22.1% | −6.8% | −14.4% | −25.3% | −1.8% | −62.2% | −65.8% |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 3 of 7 | −4.2% | −38.8% | −52.0% | −27.4% | −4.0% | −35.5% | −39.8% | — | — | — |
| CGNX Cognex Corporation | 4 of 10 | −2.8% | −48.0% | −27.5% | −40.7% | −12.3% | −26.4% | −30.6% | −4.7% | −64.5% | −78.8% |
| ATS ATS Corporation | 6 of 8 | −2.1% | −42.3% | −32.6% | −46.9% | −4.7% | −51.3% | −32.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
How closely does ROK move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares ROK with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- ETN took just 80% of the S&P 500's losses, against 138% for ROK, while still keeping 114% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, ROK captured 122% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 138% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.46. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Seven of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than ROK's 0.88, led by ETN, TER and ADI.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than ROK's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROK This pageRockwell Automation, Inc. | 122% | 138% | 0.88 | 1.46 |
| ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 114% | 80% | 1.43 | 1.16 |
| TER Teradyne, Inc. | 167% | 121% | 1.37 | 1.53 |
| ADI Analog Devices, Inc. | 117% | 92% | 1.26 | 1.20 |
| PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 141% | 126% | 1.11 | 1.43 |
| AME AMETEK, Inc. | 111% | 101% | 1.10 | 1.15 |
| NOVT Novanta Inc. | 155% | 156% | 0.99 | 1.38 |
| GNRC Generac Holdings Inc. | 129% | 133% | 0.97 | 1.45 |
| ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corporation | 147% | 170% | 0.87 | 1.63 |
| DOV Dover Corporation | 114% | 133% | 0.85 | 1.27 |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 105% | 127% | 0.83 | 1.12 |
| EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 124% | 153% | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. | 94% | 116% | 0.81 | 1.04 |
| HON Honeywell International Inc. | 90% | 118% | 0.77 | 1.00 |
| ADSK Autodesk, Inc. | 130% | 179% | 0.73 | 1.34 |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 115% | 157% | 0.73 | 1.63 |
| AZTA Azenta, Inc. | 145% | 210% | 0.69 | 1.67 |
| CGNX Cognex Corporation | 126% | 182% | 0.69 | 1.58 |
| ATS ATS Corporation | 104% | 151% | 0.69 | 1.62 |
What diversifies ROK?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with ROK's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing ROK with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in ROK into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+10.0% for ROK alone, +12.8% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of ROK over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.39 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in five of the eight calendar years in which ROK lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which ROK lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% ROK and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2008 | 2001 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +45.6% | 0.40 | −6.2% | −24.8% | −21.8% | −5.5% | −3.9% | −51.9% | −11.3% | −1.9% | 33.5% | +10.0% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.34 | +119% | 1.48 | +15.9% | +3.8% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 27.5% | +12.2% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.34 | +225% | 1.34 | +29.8% | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | +8.1% | −20.8% | — | — | 27.8% | +14.1% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.39 | +101% | 1.04 | +33.4% | +10.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | +23.8% | — | — | — | 28.1% | +11.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.07 | +126% | 0.96 | +26.7% | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | −2.2% | +4.9% | — | — | 26.8% | +12.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.11 | +177% | 0.93 | +5.6% | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | −8.7% | −39.0% | −18.2% | — | 27.9% | +13.9% |
| DFIV InternationalDimensional - International Value ETF | 0.38 | +99.4% | 0.93 | +7.2% | −3.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.2% | +11.9% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.43 | +153% | 0.89 | +16.1% | −28.9% | −9.9% | −12.9% | +7.0% | −45.3% | +2.1% | — | 29.4% | +13.1% |
| EUFN InternationaliShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | 0.36 | +133% | 0.89 | +17.2% | −8.8% | −23.1% | −4.7% | −9.7% | — | — | — | 28.5% | +13.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2024 | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2008 | 2001 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +45.6% | 0.40 | −6.2% | −24.8% | −21.8% | −5.5% | −3.9% | −51.9% | −11.3% | −1.9% | 33.5% | +10.0% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.32 | +479% | 1.55 | +19.0% | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +23.0% | −39.6% | −2.5% | +51.7% | 28.9% | +16.2% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.39 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +215% | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | +12.9% | −20.5% | −25.6% | — | 33.2% | +28.1% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.09 | +413% | 1.44 | +23.7% | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +29.3% | −40.4% | +4.9% | +46.9% | 27.7% | +15.9% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.08 | +690% | 1.41 | −4.0% | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | +0.4% | — | — | — | 28.1% | +18.7% |
| HWM Aerospace & DefenseHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.45 | +594% | 1.36 | +103% | +24.2% | −37.5% | −36.3% | +50.9% | −67.4% | +9.8% | +7.0% | 30.6% | +18.1% |
Common questions
What was ROK's worst drawdown?
ROK's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 75.8%, from April 2006 to March 2009. It took 21 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were ROK's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, ROK's best year was 1999, when it returned 168%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -51.9%.
Is there a better investment than ROK?
Among ROK's popular alternatives, PH, AME and EMR earned more than ROK with less volatility over the past 5 years. PH returned 27.4% a year at 28.8% volatility, against 7.8% a year at 32.3%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, FAST (industrial distribution) and DE (industrial machinery) earned more than ROK with less volatility over the past 5 years. FAST returned 15.8% a year at 24.6% volatility, against 7.8% a year at 32.3%.
Is ROK more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. ROK's volatility over the past 5 years was 32.3%, 1.9 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, ROK's return lands within 32.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is ROK's Sharpe ratio?
ROK's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.40, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so ROK earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is ROK with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, ROK's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.70 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against ROK instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a ROK holding.
What are the best alternatives to ROK?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed ROK in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: ADI, AME and TER.
Did ROK outperform the S&P 500?
ROK finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 19 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +38.4%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did ROK do in stock market crashes?
ROK fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the 2011 euro debt crisis, when ROK fell 37.5% and the S&P 500 fell 17.9%.
What diversifies ROK?
These had a low correlation with ROK over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.34), DXJ (correlation 0.34) and EMLP (correlation 0.39); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.32), CLS (correlation 0.39) and MCK (correlation 0.09). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than ROK's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of ROK's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to ROK
ADIAnalog Devices
AMEAMETEK
TERTeradyne
EMREmerson Electric
PHParker-Hannifin
ETNEaton
ITWIllinois Tool Works
ADSKAutodesk
HONHoneywell International
NXPINXP Semiconductors