Relative Intelligence · Banks

How JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on JPM alone. It places JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where JPM stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: JPM's full trading record, from October 1986 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, JPM fell 0.6% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?JPM held up far better than its industry: it fell 0.6% over the past 3 months while the banks ETF KBE (State Street SPDR S&P Bank ETF) fell 6.8%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsJPM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. On the flip side, it has trailed the market, rising 13.0% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termJPM turned $10,000 into $63,700 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. JPM's 10-year return of 537% puts it ahead of 87% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, JPM has typically fallen 1.5 times as far as the S&P 500. The 2022 bear market took 37.9% off JPM, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than HSBC (31.8%) but less than C (Citigroup, 39.2%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, JPM has a correlation of 0.66 over 5 years, more closely than 97% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. When the S&P 500 had a down month, JPM usually fell with it (18 of 22 months). By year ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- BNY (Bank of New York Mellon) and HSBC earned more than JPM over the past 5 years with similar volatility: BNY returned 22.7% a year at 24.4% volatility, against 17.3% a year at 24.3%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, banks) earned more than JPM with less volatility over the past 5 years: 19.2% a year at 21.6% volatility, against 17.3% a year at 24.3%.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 23 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than JPM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT (Walmart), TJX (TJX Companies) and BTI (British American Tobacco p.l.c.).
How much would $10,000 in JPM have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in JPM over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of JPM over the same span and JPM's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in JPM at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $189,407 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of JPM, and RY finished highest, at $442,765.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 311 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of JPM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- RY$442,765+4,328% total · +14.0% a year
- LLY$396,376+3,864% total · +13.5% a year
- SPGI$384,837+3,748% total · +13.4% a year
- BMO$282,977+2,730% total · +12.2% a year
- MCK$208,304+1,983% total · +11.0% a year
- JPM$189,407+1,794% total · +10.7% a year
- MS$148,562+1,386% total · +9.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- BNY$121,131+1,111% total · +9.0% a year
- STT$96,326+863% total · +8.1% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 611 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of JPM; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- HSBC$51,297+413% total · +38.7% a year
- MUFG$44,537+345% total · +34.8% a year
- BNY$31,954+220% total · +26.2% a year
- GS$26,885+169% total · +21.9% a year
- CM$25,433+154% total · +20.5% a year
- STT$23,984+140% total · +19.1% a year
- RY$23,646+136% total · +18.8% a year
- JPM$22,905+129% total · +18.0% a year
- MS$22,663+127% total · +17.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
JPM at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- JPM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 74.0%, from March 2000 to October 2002. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, JPM's best was 2003, when it returned 60.5%, and its worst was 2002, when it lost 30.7%. It lost money in nine of those years.
- JPM is 7.7% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $891B
- Industry
- Banks - Diversified
- Price history from
- October 1986
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +13.0%total return
- Past 3 years
- +150%+35.7% a year
- Past 5 years
- +122%+17.3% a year
- Past 10 years
- +537%+20.3% a year
- Best calendar year
- +60.5%2003
- Worst calendar year
- −30.7%2002
- Losing years
- 9 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 24.3%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.78return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −74.0%Mar 2000 to Oct 2002
- From its all-time high
- −7.7%below the peak
JPM against the whole market
Where JPM ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does JPM rank among all stocks?
This section ranks JPM on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how JPM stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- JPM is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 10% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | JPM | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +13.0% | 1,471 of 3,287 | top 45% |
| 3-year return | +150% | 595 of 3,017 | top 20% |
| 5-year return | +122% | 561 of 2,893 | top 19% |
| 10-year return | +537% | 279 of 2,202 | top 13% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 24.3% | 279 of 2,893 | top 10% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.78 | 307 of 2,893 | top 11% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −43.6% | 246 of 2,187 | top 11% |
What has beaten JPM on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). JPM sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than JPM with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 11 stocks and 12 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than JPM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is fewer than 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half JPM's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 22% less than JPM's 24.3%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.78 for JPM.
- None of JPM's popular alternatives made it, but CM (banks) did: 19.2% a year at 21.6% volatility, 11% less than JPM's 24.3%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to JPM; faint dots are 15 more of the 23 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than JPM?
Investments that beat JPM over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among JPM's popular alternatives, BNY and HSBC earned more than JPM over the past 5 years with similar volatility: BNY returned 22.7% a year at 24.4% volatility, against 17.3% a year at 24.3%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CM (banks) earned more than JPM with less volatility over the past 5 years: 19.2% a year at 21.6% volatility, against 17.3% a year at 24.3%.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 23 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than JPM with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT, TJX and BTI.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat JPM over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks JPM's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than JPM follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than JPM's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× JPM's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than JPM's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with JPM?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.66 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 2 shownThe investments people most often weigh against JPM. 2 of 25 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.75 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatility | +33.1% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | +319% | 0.41 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Banks and the categories next to it (Regional Banks, Capital Markets, Payment Processing, Asset Management), plus JPM's specific themes. 19 of 119 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.34 | — | ||
| On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatility | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.62 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +38.7% | 33.3% | 1.16 | −69.6% | +542% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.36 | — | ||
CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Higher return, similar volatility | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.15 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 120 of 3,489 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.58 | 0.13% | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.04 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.25 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.61 | — | ||
MUSAMurphy USA Inc. · Convenience Stores | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 31.2% | 0.90 | −35.5% | +706% | 0.19 | — | |
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.56 | 0.40% | |
What these numbers mean for JPM
- Annual return
- JPM returned 17.3% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $22,200. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- JPM's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.3%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, JPM's return lands within 24.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- JPM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.78, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so JPM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- JPM's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 43.6%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 43.6% fall takes a 77.4% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, JPM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.66 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against JPM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a JPM holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 23 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than JPM with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 20 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with JPM | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.58 | 0.13% |
| 2 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.31 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.61 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.47 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.52 | — | |
| 6 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.37 | 0.45% |
| 7 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.31 | 0.48% |
| 8 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.45 | — | |
| 9 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 0.34 | — | |
| 10 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.50 | — | |
| 11 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.56 | — | |
| 12 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.35 | — | |
| 13 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.11 | 0.80% |
| 14 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.37 | — |
| 15 | Same or nearby category | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.59 | — | |
| 16 | MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy | Whole market | +18.6% | 19.7% | 0.97 | −64.6% | +186% | 0.59 | 0.45% |
| 17 | EUFNiShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF · Financial Sector Equity | Whole market | +18.5% | 21.8% | 0.89 | −53.2% | +233% | 0.70 | 0.49% |
| 18 | EWPiShares MSCI Spain ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +19.2% | 20.3% | 0.97 | −46.4% | +196% | 0.59 | 0.50% |
| 19 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.44 | 0.61% |
| 20 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.58 | 0.95% |
JPM against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against JPM, compared period by period and year by year.
How do JPM's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at JPM, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 25 popular alternatives earned more than JPM over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- 19 of the 25 popular alternatives earned less than JPM over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, JPM returned 17.3% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (24.3% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than JPM with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | +33.1% | 25.9% |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | +22.7% | 24.4% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | +19.6% | 28.6% |
| JPM This pageJPMorgan Chase & Co. | +17.3% | 24.3% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | +16.0% | 28.8% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | +15.1% | 29.4% |
| STT State Street Corporation | +14.4% | 29.9% |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | +13.6% | 21.4% |
| AXP American Express Company | +13.5% | 29.3% |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | +13.1% | 29.5% |
| V Visa Inc. | +12.8% | 22.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | +12.4% | 23.8% |
| MTB M&T Bank Corporation | +9.8% | 29.7% |
| CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | +9.2% | 33.6% |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | +8.9% | 29.3% |
| RF Regions Financial Corporation | +7.8% | 30.9% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | +7.1% | 27.1% |
| FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | +6.8% | 31.4% |
| COF Capital One Financial Corporation | +4.9% | 35.2% |
| PNC The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | +4.6% | 26.8% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | +4.0% | 26.6% |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | +3.3% | 29.6% |
| HBAN Huntington Bancshares Incorporated | +3.0% | 31.2% |
| KEY KeyCorp | +2.3% | 37.6% |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | +0.7% | 25.6% |
| TFC Truist Financial Corporation | −1.2% | 31.6% |
Has JPM consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares JPM with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than JPM helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Only one of the 25 popular alternatives, BNY, outperformed JPM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than JPM over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. (this page) | — | −4.3% | −0.6% | +6.8% | +5.0% | +13.0% | +150% | +122% | +537% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | — | $891B | — |
| BNY QualifiedBank of New York Mellon Corp | 3/5 short2/3 long | −6.3% | −7.7% | +7.4% | +24.8% | +35.3% | +272% | +179% | +341% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | — | $98B | — |
| HSBC Banks - DiversifiedHSBC Holdings plc | 2/5 short2/3 long | −10.1% | −5.9% | +2.3% | +19.8% | +47.7% | +201% | +318% | +319% | 25.9% | 1.24 | −62.3% | — | $324B | — |
| MS Financial - Capital MarketsMorgan Stanley | 1/5 short2/3 long | −12.5% | −14.0% | −4.4% | +0.8% | +13.9% | +170% | +110% | +627% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | — | $285B | — |
| GS Financial - Capital MarketsThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −7.8% | −15.7% | −5.2% | −1.8% | +18.2% | +215% | +145% | +521% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | — | $258B | — |
| STT Asset ManagementState Street Corporation | 3/5 short1/3 long | −9.2% | −8.3% | +12.1% | +31.3% | +47.9% | +181% | +96.2% | +212% | 29.9% | 0.60 | −59.6% | — | $46B | — |
| CFG Banks - RegionalCitizens Financial Group, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | −4.7% | −9.6% | −1.0% | +10.4% | +31.5% | +205% | +55.0% | +266% | 33.6% | 0.43 | −65.6% | — | $27B | — |
| NTRS Asset ManagementNorthern Trust Corporation | 2/5 short1/3 long | −7.5% | −9.1% | +5.0% | +20.6% | +31.1% | +180% | +52.9% | +205% | 29.3% | 0.44 | −50.0% | — | $30B | — |
| C Banks - DiversifiedCitigroup Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −9.3% | −4.3% | −7.0% | +4.8% | +26.0% | +238% | +102% | +234% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | — | $206B | — |
| V Financial - Credit ServicesVisa Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | +9.9% | +13.0% | +30.0% | +18.0% | +19.0% | +78.2% | +82.5% | +429% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | — | $759B | — |
| MA Financial - Credit ServicesMastercard Incorporated | 4/5 short0/3 long | +9.5% | +13.5% | +20.5% | +10.9% | +10.3% | +64.3% | +79.2% | +541% | 23.8% | 0.61 | −41.0% | — | $543B | — |
| BLK Asset ManagementBlackRock, Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +3.5% | +7.6% | +8.8% | +5.7% | −0.6% | +96.3% | +41.1% | +313% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | — | $175B | — |
| BMO Banks - DiversifiedBank of Montreal | 3/5 short0/3 long | −5.5% | −5.3% | +10.8% | +29.7% | +37.6% | +146% | +89.4% | +295% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | — | $116B | — |
| FITB Banks - RegionalFifth Third Bancorp | 3/5 short0/3 long | −0.9% | −7.9% | +4.4% | +12.5% | +29.6% | +151% | +38.9% | +255% | 31.4% | 0.37 | −64.0% | — | $48B | — |
| USB Banks - RegionalU.S. Bancorp | 3/5 short0/3 long | −1.3% | −5.5% | +5.5% | +12.7% | +30.3% | +117% | +17.6% | +94.6% | 29.6% | 0.26 | −52.1% | — | $92B | — |
| RF Banks - RegionalRegions Financial Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −2.5% | −9.6% | +0.3% | +4.0% | +20.5% | +120% | +45.7% | +278% | 30.9% | 0.40 | −60.8% | — | $24B | — |
| PNC Banks - RegionalThe PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −4.4% | −10.8% | −1.0% | +7.9% | +25.3% | +120% | +25.1% | +230% | 26.8% | 0.30 | −49.6% | — | $88B | — |
| MTB Banks - RegionalM&T Bank Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −3.8% | −11.9% | +0.7% | +9.2% | +23.4% | +111% | +59.3% | +143% | 29.7% | 0.46 | −53.0% | — | $32B | — |
| KEY Banks - RegionalKeyCorp | 2/5 short0/3 long | −0.3% | −9.9% | −4.4% | +2.1% | +24.6% | +143% | +11.9% | +143% | 37.6% | 0.25 | −65.2% | — | $22B | — |
| TFC Banks - RegionalTruist Financial Corporation | 2/5 short0/3 long | −3.4% | −6.3% | −5.0% | −1.9% | +13.6% | +102% | −5.7% | +82.7% | 31.6% | 0.12 | −59.1% | — | $58B | — |
| AXP Financial - Credit ServicesAmerican Express Company | 1/5 short0/3 long | +1.8% | −9.3% | −2.9% | −13.8% | −7.9% | +133% | +88.5% | +446% | 29.3% | 0.58 | −49.6% | — | $215B | — |
| SPGI Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesS&P Global Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | +8.3% | −2.1% | −0.6% | −13.9% | −7.4% | +28.2% | +3.7% | +293% | 25.6% | 0.16 | −39.8% | — | $129B | — |
| COF Financial - Credit ServicesCapital One Financial Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.6% | −2.2% | −1.2% | −17.8% | −4.7% | +134% | +27.0% | +222% | 35.2% | 0.31 | −60.3% | — | $124B | — |
| HBAN Banks - RegionalHuntington Bancshares Incorporated | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.1% | −13.1% | −7.2% | −8.5% | +1.9% | +82.4% | +16.1% | +132% | 31.2% | 0.25 | −55.0% | — | $31B | — |
| BAC Banks - DiversifiedBank of America Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.6% | −15.8% | −5.2% | −8.0% | −0.6% | +107% | +21.6% | +282% | 26.6% | 0.28 | −49.0% | — | $354B | — |
| WFC Banks - DiversifiedWells Fargo & Company | 0/5 short0/3 long | −5.0% | −4.3% | +1.4% | −12.3% | −2.4% | +119% | +85.0% | +141% | 29.5% | 0.57 | −64.5% | — | $248B | — |
How did JPM do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where JPM ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with JPM and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- JPM finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 16 of its 29 full calendar years, and ahead of it in each of the last four.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, JPM finished in the top quarter in nine of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 9 of 26.
- Among its popular alternatives, SPGI came out ahead of JPM most often, in 21 of the 29 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of JPM; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places JPM among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of JPM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPM This pageJPMorgan Chase & Co. | — | +37.3% | +44.3% | +30.6% | −12.6% | +27.8% | −5.5% | +47.3% | −6.6% | +26.8% | +34.5% | +8.4% | +9.9% | +36.7% | +36.2% | −19.9% | +2.3% | +34.4% | −25.1% | −6.9% | +25.7% | +5.7% | +10.0% | +60.5% | −30.7% | −17.4% | −10.1% | +11.7% | +32.9% | +25.5% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 9 of 29 | 9 of 26 | 5 of 26 | 4 of 26 | 12 of 26 | 18 of 26 | 14 of 26 | 4 of 26 | 5 of 26 | 10 of 26 | 7 of 26 | 5 of 26 | 15 of 25 | 14 of 25 | 8 of 25 | 17 of 25 | 18 of 25 | 9 of 25 | 5 of 24 | 9 of 24 | 7 of 23 | 8 of 23 | 14 of 23 | 3 of 23 | 20 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 22 of 23 | 7 of 20 | 5 of 20 | 20 of 21 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 12 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | 11 of 29 | +54.4% | +51.9% | +18.5% | −19.1% | +40.6% | −12.9% | +9.6% | −10.8% | +15.7% | +17.1% | +3.3% | +18.3% | +38.6% | +32.1% | −32.8% | +9.3% | +0.9% | −40.4% | +20.0% | +26.8% | −1.2% | +4.8% | +45.2% | −38.9% | −23.4% | +42.7% | +1.6% | +41.6% | +75.3% |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 10 of 27 | +67.9% | +34.5% | +39.3% | +7.8% | +20.8% | −31.7% | +1.5% | −16.1% | +35.9% | +9.9% | −11.5% | −10.2% | +8.5% | +45.9% | −22.2% | −7.5% | +22.2% | −38.0% | −4.0% | +18.9% | −1.5% | +12.6% | +52.3% | −5.2% | −15.3% | +6.5% | — | — | +15.8% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 13 of 29 | +45.2% | +39.7% | +13.9% | −10.3% | +46.6% | +38.1% | +32.7% | −22.8% | +26.6% | +36.1% | −16.7% | +25.0% | +65.4% | +27.6% | −43.9% | −7.5% | +88.3% | −68.8% | −22.1% | +46.3% | +4.6% | −2.0% | +48.4% | −27.0% | −28.1% | +12.3% | +103% | +21.9% | +80.3% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 15 of 26 | +56.6% | +52.0% | +15.9% | −7.9% | +47.6% | +17.4% | +40.5% | −33.5% | +7.4% | +34.9% | −5.8% | +10.8% | +40.8% | +43.4% | −45.6% | +0.5% | +103% | −60.4% | +8.6% | +57.4% | +23.9% | +6.5% | +46.3% | −26.0% | −12.8% | +14.1% | — | — | — |
| STT State Street Corporation | 12 of 29 | +35.5% | +30.2% | +3.5% | −13.8% | +31.0% | −4.8% | +29.3% | −34.0% | +27.8% | +19.8% | −13.9% | +8.7% | +58.6% | +19.2% | −11.4% | +6.6% | +10.8% | −50.7% | +21.9% | +23.2% | +14.5% | −4.4% | +35.4% | −24.5% | −15.2% | +71.1% | +5.0% | +21.5% | +81.6% |
| CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 3 of 11 | +38.6% | +38.0% | −11.0% | −13.4% | +37.1% | −6.7% | +41.9% | −27.5% | +19.9% | +38.7% | +7.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 9 of 29 | +36.9% | +25.6% | −1.0% | −23.8% | +31.6% | −9.3% | +30.6% | −14.7% | +14.2% | +26.1% | +9.1% | +11.1% | +26.1% | +29.9% | −26.5% | +8.1% | +2.7% | −30.8% | +28.2% | +19.1% | +8.6% | +6.7% | +34.5% | −40.9% | −25.4% | +55.1% | +22.5% | +26.7% | +95.2% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 9 of 29 | +70.4% | +41.9% | +19.0% | −22.1% | +0.9% | −19.7% | +57.9% | −28.5% | +27.0% | +15.9% | −4.1% | +3.9% | +31.8% | +50.5% | −44.3% | +42.9% | −50.6% | −75.9% | −44.8% | +19.6% | +4.6% | +2.8% | +41.6% | −20.4% | +0.1% | +23.6% | +70.2% | −6.8% | +79.9% |
| V Visa Inc. | 10 of 17 | +11.8% | +22.3% | +26.3% | −3.4% | −0.3% | +17.1% | +43.3% | +16.5% | +47.2% | +1.4% | +19.1% | +18.7% | +48.0% | +50.5% | +45.4% | −18.9% | +68.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 10 of 19 | +9.0% | +24.2% | +23.4% | −2.7% | +1.2% | +20.2% | +59.2% | +25.3% | +47.7% | +6.9% | +13.8% | +3.7% | +70.7% | +32.1% | +66.7% | −12.2% | +79.8% | −33.4% | +119% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 14 of 26 | +6.6% | +29.3% | +17.9% | −20.4% | +29.4% | +47.2% | +31.9% | −21.6% | +38.2% | +14.6% | −2.4% | +15.7% | +57.0% | +19.8% | −3.6% | −15.9% | +76.6% | −37.0% | +45.1% | +41.8% | +42.4% | +47.6% | +35.9% | −5.5% | −0.7% | +144% | — | — | — |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 15 of 29 | +39.6% | +3.0% | +14.6% | −12.4% | +46.9% | +3.3% | +23.9% | −14.9% | +15.4% | +32.9% | −16.8% | +10.4% | +13.7% | +17.3% | −0.3% | +13.7% | +121% | −51.9% | −0.4% | +9.4% | +20.4% | +21.0% | +62.9% | +23.0% | −9.6% | +62.5% | −10.8% | −6.1% | +44.8% |
| FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | 9 of 29 | +14.8% | +27.2% | +10.4% | −21.9% | +62.4% | −5.4% | +35.2% | −20.3% | +15.1% | +37.9% | +1.3% | −0.8% | +41.9% | +22.5% | −11.3% | +51.2% | +18.9% | −65.6% | −35.5% | +13.0% | −17.3% | −17.9% | +3.0% | −3.0% | +4.1% | +23.8% | +4.3% | +32.4% | +97.8% |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | 10 of 29 | +16.4% | +15.6% | +4.8% | −19.1% | +24.3% | −17.9% | +33.6% | −12.4% | +6.6% | +23.4% | −2.8% | +13.8% | +29.6% | +20.9% | +2.3% | +20.7% | −9.0% | −16.6% | −8.0% | +26.3% | −0.5% | +10.6% | +45.3% | +5.3% | −6.8% | +13.2% | −30.5% | +64.5% | +90.1% |
| RF Regions Financial Corporation | 12 of 29 | +20.2% | +27.0% | −5.7% | +2.4% | +39.4% | −1.6% | +33.3% | −20.6% | +22.9% | +53.7% | −7.0% | +8.7% | +40.2% | +66.7% | −38.1% | +32.7% | −31.6% | −64.0% | −33.7% | +15.0% | 0.0% | +26.8% | +21.3% | +21.3% | +20.5% | +23.2% | −32.4% | +2.0% | +71.9% |
| PNC The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 10 of 29 | +12.2% | +29.4% | +2.7% | −18.6% | +38.2% | −2.8% | +40.9% | −17.0% | +26.0% | +25.8% | +6.8% | +20.3% | +36.4% | +3.6% | −3.1% | +15.8% | +10.2% | −22.2% | −8.3% | +23.6% | +11.7% | +8.9% | +36.2% | −22.5% | −20.7% | +70.4% | −15.0% | −2.2% | +56.7% |
| MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 9 of 29 | +10.4% | +41.7% | −1.7% | −2.9% | +24.3% | −22.2% | +21.6% | −14.6% | +10.8% | +32.2% | −1.3% | +10.4% | +21.3% | +33.2% | −9.1% | +34.8% | +23.1% | −27.0% | −31.5% | +14.2% | +2.8% | +11.6% | +25.6% | +10.4% | +8.6% | +66.3% | −19.4% | +12.5% | +62.8% |
| KEY KeyCorp | 10 of 29 | +26.2% | +25.4% | −11.6% | −21.6% | +45.9% | −14.5% | +42.7% | −24.6% | +12.7% | +42.1% | −3.2% | +5.5% | +62.4% | +12.0% | −11.6% | +60.4% | −34.0% | −61.6% | −35.5% | +19.9% | +0.9% | +20.1% | +22.1% | +8.1% | −8.8% | +33.9% | −28.4% | −7.1% | +44.5% |
| TFC Truist Financial Corporation | 8 of 29 | +19.1% | +23.7% | −8.6% | −23.5% | +26.1% | −11.1% | +34.6% | −10.2% | +8.7% | +28.4% | −0.1% | +6.9% | +32.7% | +18.6% | −1.9% | +5.9% | −2.0% | −4.5% | −27.2% | +8.9% | +3.4% | +12.8% | +8.1% | +5.6% | −0.4% | +40.6% | −30.6% | +28.5% | +81.3% |
| AXP American Express Company | 15 of 29 | +26.0% | +60.3% | +28.7% | −8.5% | +36.9% | −1.1% | +32.5% | −2.6% | +36.2% | +8.6% | −24.2% | +3.7% | +59.8% | +23.6% | +11.6% | +7.8% | +126% | −63.7% | −13.4% | +19.1% | +4.3% | +17.6% | +37.7% | +0.2% | −34.5% | −0.3% | +63.3% | +15.7% | +59.9% |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 21 of 29 | +5.7% | +13.9% | +32.8% | −28.4% | +44.7% | +21.4% | +62.3% | +1.4% | +59.3% | +10.5% | +12.3% | +15.5% | +45.9% | +30.1% | +26.6% | +12.0% | +49.3% | −45.5% | −34.7% | +33.5% | +14.2% | +33.0% | +17.8% | +0.8% | +5.7% | −3.2% | +22.8% | +41.1% | +64.4% |
| COF Capital One Financial Corporation | 12 of 29 | +37.6% | +38.3% | +44.3% | −34.6% | +49.3% | −2.7% | +38.6% | −22.8% | +16.3% | +23.8% | −10.9% | +9.4% | +34.2% | +37.5% | −0.1% | +11.6% | +24.1% | −30.3% | −38.4% | −11.0% | +2.7% | +37.6% | +107% | −44.8% | −17.8% | +36.9% | +26.0% | +113% | +51.5% |
| HBAN Huntington Bancshares Incorporated | 9 of 29 | +10.8% | +33.7% | −4.6% | −4.5% | +27.1% | −11.2% | +31.8% | −15.2% | +12.9% | +23.0% | +7.5% | +11.6% | +54.1% | +19.5% | −18.4% | +89.5% | −51.5% | −44.2% | −34.3% | +4.3% | −0.4% | +13.4% | +24.3% | +12.5% | +11.0% | −22.1% | −10.1% | −5.8% | +54.1% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 9 of 29 | +28.0% | +33.9% | +4.9% | −23.8% | +49.6% | −11.6% | +46.1% | −15.0% | +35.7% | +33.4% | −4.8% | +15.7% | +34.5% | +109% | −58.1% | −11.2% | +7.6% | −63.1% | −18.9% | +20.8% | +2.4% | +21.5% | +20.1% | +14.6% | +42.7% | −4.5% | −14.0% | +1.2% | +27.3% |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 10 of 29 | +35.6% | +46.5% | +22.9% | −11.9% | +61.1% | −41.6% | +21.4% | −21.8% | +13.2% | +4.7% | +1.8% | +24.1% | +36.7% | +27.3% | −9.6% | +15.7% | −6.3% | +1.7% | −12.1% | +16.9% | +4.5% | +9.0% | +29.5% | +10.3% | −20.2% | +40.5% | +3.3% | +5.1% | +81.9% |
Risk and diversification
How JPM has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were JPM's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents JPM's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1986, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all three of JPM's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after JPM fell 74.0% from March 2000 to October 2002; it did not regain that peak until January 2007, four years later.
Green means JPM fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | JPM fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −74.0% | −47.2% | Mar 2000 | Oct 2002 | 2.6 years | Jan 2007 | 4.3 years |
| No named crash | −72.7% | — | Oct 1989 | Oct 1990 | 12 months | Mar 1992 | 17 months |
| 2008 financial crisis | −68.1% | −53.2% | May 2007 | Mar 2009 | 22 months | Jan 2013 | 3.8 years |
| No named crash | −56.2% | — | Feb 1987 | Jan 1988 | 11 months | Sep 1989 | 20 months |
| No named crash | −47.3% | −16.0% | Jul 1998 | Oct 1998 | 3 months | Jan 1999 | 3 months |
How did JPM do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far JPM, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- JPM fell further than the S&P 500 in eight of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when JPM fell 74.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
- Among its popular alternatives, V held up best, falling less than JPM in six of the eight crashes they both traded through.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than JPM.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPM This pageJPMorgan Chase & Co. | — | −5.4% | −37.9% | −42.5% | −21.3% | −5.6% | −22.0% | −32.1% | −0.1% | −67.7% | −74.0% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | 5 of 10 | −11.4% | −40.5% | −40.1% | −16.2% | −5.4% | −27.0% | −30.9% | −0.5% | −62.4% | −62.6% |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 6 of 10 | −7.3% | −31.8% | −20.5% | −13.1% | −4.6% | −30.8% | −25.1% | 0.0% | −73.8% | −41.4% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 2 of 10 | −8.2% | −32.4% | −50.6% | −24.6% | −6.7% | −43.9% | −47.7% | 0.0% | −86.2% | −72.0% |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −9.7% | −30.5% | −42.8% | −33.3% | −5.3% | −31.2% | −34.3% | 0.0% | −78.8% | −54.7% |
| STT State Street Corporation | 2 of 10 | −14.6% | −41.4% | −45.1% | −32.3% | −8.3% | −34.1% | −28.3% | −1.9% | −82.3% | −50.7% |
| CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −19.5% | −39.7% | −60.5% | −31.3% | −8.3% | −32.8% | — | — | — | — |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 5 of 10 | −10.7% | −36.0% | −39.0% | −27.2% | −8.1% | −29.9% | −25.4% | 0.0% | −60.5% | −65.2% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 1 of 10 | −11.7% | −39.2% | −54.8% | −33.1% | −6.7% | −40.3% | −42.6% | −1.0% | −97.7% | −52.7% |
| V Visa Inc. | 6 of 8 | −3.5% | −24.1% | −36.4% | −19.1% | −5.8% | −15.8% | −11.5% | −0.8% | — | — |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 6 of 9 | −4.0% | −28.2% | −41.0% | −21.9% | −5.8% | −20.4% | −13.8% | −3.1% | −62.7% | — |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −7.2% | −40.8% | −42.3% | −25.2% | −7.1% | −19.9% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −60.4% | −33.0% |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 4 of 10 | −5.5% | −30.5% | −49.4% | −23.5% | −6.2% | −18.9% | −16.4% | 0.0% | −68.5% | −26.5% |
| FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | 3 of 10 | −22.1% | −36.5% | −60.9% | −23.8% | −6.1% | −34.9% | −28.9% | −2.3% | −96.9% | −22.0% |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | 5 of 10 | −19.7% | −36.8% | −47.2% | −20.4% | −7.5% | −17.7% | −24.7% | −1.2% | −76.1% | −42.8% |
| RF Regions Financial Corporation | 2 of 10 | −12.6% | −27.1% | −55.1% | −34.8% | −7.0% | −33.7% | −52.9% | −2.7% | −91.3% | −24.4% |
| PNC The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 4 of 10 | −10.4% | −34.0% | −47.8% | −23.2% | −5.4% | −20.8% | −24.1% | −0.4% | −76.7% | −49.6% |
| MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 3 of 10 | −9.4% | −18.0% | −47.6% | −21.1% | −5.7% | −23.2% | −23.1% | −0.2% | −69.6% | −23.9% |
| KEY KeyCorp | 1 of 10 | −34.2% | −40.6% | −58.8% | −32.9% | −7.7% | −32.5% | −31.7% | −1.1% | −82.9% | −25.5% |
| TFC Truist Financial Corporation | 5 of 10 | −26.3% | −35.8% | −53.5% | −20.1% | −6.8% | −24.4% | −27.2% | 0.0% | −66.6% | −24.8% |
| AXP American Express Company | 4 of 10 | −9.8% | −31.6% | −49.6% | −20.7% | −8.6% | −36.6% | −18.1% | −4.5% | −83.4% | −59.1% |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 7 of 10 | −4.2% | −36.3% | −38.1% | −24.6% | −6.2% | −21.3% | −20.8% | −0.4% | −66.4% | −29.5% |
| COF Capital One Financial Corporation | 2 of 10 | −11.1% | −42.6% | −58.8% | −28.2% | −9.6% | −28.5% | −24.2% | −2.1% | −87.7% | −65.6% |
| HBAN Huntington Bancshares Incorporated | 3 of 10 | −23.0% | −31.3% | −49.6% | −28.3% | −6.1% | −31.7% | −26.2% | −3.6% | −93.9% | −37.2% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 1 of 10 | −12.4% | −38.7% | −47.8% | −26.4% | −6.9% | −37.8% | −45.2% | −0.6% | −93.4% | −36.3% |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 5 of 10 | −12.4% | −36.3% | −47.1% | −20.1% | −13.5% | −20.9% | −21.1% | −1.2% | −79.0% | −29.2% |
How closely does JPM move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares JPM with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Over the past 10 years, JPM captured 117% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 103% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.09. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Only HSBC, MA and V had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than JPM's 1.14, out of 25 popular alternatives with the same record.
- MA took just 88% of the S&P 500's losses, against 103% for JPM, while still keeping 105% of its gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than JPM's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPM This pageJPMorgan Chase & Co. | 117% | 103% | 1.14 | 1.09 |
| HSBC HSBC Holdings plc | 79% | 53% | 1.49 | 0.58 |
| MA Mastercard Incorporated | 105% | 88% | 1.20 | 0.95 |
| V Visa Inc. | 93% | 79% | 1.18 | 0.87 |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 142% | 137% | 1.04 | 1.39 |
| AXP American Express Company | 117% | 113% | 1.03 | 1.16 |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 136% | 133% | 1.02 | 1.39 |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | 115% | 120% | 0.96 | 1.08 |
| BMO Bank of Montreal | 104% | 112% | 0.93 | 1.12 |
| FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | 102% | 114% | 0.89 | 1.22 |
| RF Regions Financial Corporation | 113% | 127% | 0.89 | 1.26 |
| MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 75% | 86% | 0.87 | 0.86 |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 127% | 146% | 0.87 | 1.36 |
| PNC The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 108% | 127% | 0.85 | 1.15 |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 107% | 125% | 0.85 | 1.04 |
| CFG Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 118% | 140% | 0.84 | 1.37 |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 111% | 136% | 0.82 | 1.18 |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 127% | 157% | 0.81 | 1.30 |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 131% | 165% | 0.80 | 1.49 |
| COF Capital One Financial Corporation | 115% | 146% | 0.79 | 1.39 |
| STT State Street Corporation | 128% | 166% | 0.77 | 1.48 |
| HBAN Huntington Bancshares Incorporated | 89% | 116% | 0.76 | 1.13 |
| KEY KeyCorp | 100% | 132% | 0.75 | 1.28 |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 96% | 129% | 0.75 | 1.13 |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | 89% | 130% | 0.69 | 1.05 |
| TFC Truist Financial Corporation | 86% | 126% | 0.68 | 1.11 |
What diversifies JPM?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with JPM's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing JPM with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in JPM into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 22% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+18.0% for JPM alone, +17.2% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and GLD have moved largely independently of JPM over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.38 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in six of the nine calendar years in which JPM lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which JPM lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% JPM and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2018 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. (this page) | 1.00 | +122% | 0.78 | −12.6% | −5.5% | −6.6% | −19.9% | −25.1% | −6.9% | −30.7% | −17.4% | −10.1% | 24.1% | +18.0% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.31 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +3.9% | −19.8% | −16.1% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | 20.3% | +20.3% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.38 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | +55.5% | −9.1% | +6.8% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −47.0% | −14.6% | — | 22.9% | +22.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.03 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | +24.8% | −1.9% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | — | — | 19.5% | +18.9% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.42 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −32.7% | −18.2% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +36.8% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +24.4% | 22.0% | +19.7% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.35 | +153% | 0.89 | −28.9% | +31.5% | −9.9% | −21.8% | −45.3% | +6.4% | −24.4% | +2.1% | — | 21.6% | +19.5% |
| EDIV InternationalState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 0.37 | +69.9% | 0.84 | −15.3% | −10.0% | −6.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.4% | +17.1% |
| PTLC Broad MarketPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 0.44 | +57.4% | 0.83 | −8.6% | −1.2% | +1.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.4% | +16.9% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.27 | +59.7% | 0.82 | +21.6% | +1.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.8% | +17.2% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2018 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. (this page) | 1.00 | +122% | 0.78 | −12.6% | −5.5% | −6.6% | −19.9% | −25.1% | −6.9% | −30.7% | −17.4% | −10.1% | 24.1% | +18.0% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.33 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | +10.1% | −24.5% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | 21.6% | +22.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.48 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −2.4% | −16.3% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −65.1% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 27.0% | +35.1% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.41 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +6.7% | +0.8% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +2.1% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 24.4% | +31.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.25 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +27.1% | −28.4% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 21.2% | +22.0% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.31 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −27.4% | −8.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.2% | +24.6% |
Common questions
What was JPM's worst drawdown?
JPM's deepest decline since it began trading in 1986 was 74.0%, from March 2000 to October 2002. It took about four years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were JPM's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, JPM's best year was 2003, when it returned 60.5%. Its worst was 2002, with a return of -30.7%.
Is there a better investment than JPM?
Among JPM's popular alternatives, BNY and HSBC earned more than JPM over the past 5 years with similar volatility: BNY returned 22.7% a year at 24.4% volatility, against 17.3% a year at 24.3%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, CM (banks) earned more than JPM with less volatility over the past 5 years: 19.2% a year at 21.6% volatility, against 17.3% a year at 24.3%.
Is JPM more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. JPM's volatility over the past 5 years was 24.3%, 1.4 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, JPM's return lands within 24.3% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is JPM's Sharpe ratio?
JPM's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.78, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so JPM earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is JPM with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, JPM's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.66 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against JPM instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a JPM holding.
What are the best alternatives to JPM?
Of the 25 popular alternatives we compared, one outperformed JPM in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: BNY.
Did JPM outperform the S&P 500?
JPM finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 16 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +37.3%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did JPM do in stock market crashes?
JPM fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in two of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in eight. The clearest case was the dot-com bust, when JPM fell 74.0% and the S&P 500 fell 47.5%.
What diversifies JPM?
These had a low correlation with JPM over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.31), SMH (correlation 0.38) and GLD (correlation -0.03); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.33), CLS (correlation 0.48) and FIX (correlation 0.41). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than JPM's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of JPM's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.