Relative Intelligence · Banks

How Bank of Montreal (BMO) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on BMO alone. It places BMO (Bank of Montreal) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where BMO stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: BMO's full trading record, from October 1994 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowBMO has gone against the market, falling 5.3% over the past 3 months while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank) rose 2.1% and BAC (Bank of America) fell 15.8%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is BMO's own: it fell 5.3% over the past 3 months while the banks ETF EWC (iShares MSCI Canada ETF) rose 3.8%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its bank peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank) rose 2.1%, while BAC (Bank of America) fell 15.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, BMO rose 37.6% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (146% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termBMO turned $10,000 into $39,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, the past 5 years have been the better stretch: BMO rose 89.4% against 81.7% for the S&P 500, after trailing over the decade. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, BMO has typically fallen 1.2 times as far as the S&P 500. The Covid crash took 49.4% off BMO, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co., 42.5%) but less than C (Citigroup, 54.8%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, BMO has a correlation of 0.65 over 5 years, more closely than 96% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Over 10 years, BMO's beta versus the S&P 500 was 1.12: in the S&P 500's rising months it gained 1.0 times as much as the index, and in falling months it lost 1.1 times as much. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- RY (Royal Bank of Canada) and TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank) earned more than BMO with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 13.6% a year at 21.4%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- MFG (Mizuho Financial Group, banks) earned more for the risk it took than BMO over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 45.7%, against 51.0% for BMO.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 39 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BMO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them KO (Coca-Cola), RY (Royal Bank of Canada) and TD (Toronto-Dominion Bank).
How much would $10,000 in BMO have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in BMO over the past 29 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of BMO over the same span and BMO's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in BMO at the end of September 1997 would have grown to $282,977 by September 2026, more than the $132,907 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of BMO, and BN finished highest, at $725,095.
Choose a period
From the end of September 1997 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 214 of the 1,042 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BMO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BN$725,095+7,151% total · +15.9% a year
- RS$621,583+6,116% total · +15.3% a year
- RY$442,765+4,328% total · +14.0% a year
- WRB$427,501+4,175% total · +13.8% a year
- TD$422,896+4,129% total · +13.8% a year
- BMO$282,977+2,730% total · +12.2% a year
- JPM$189,407+1,794% total · +10.7% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$132,907+1,229% total · +9.3% a year
- FITB$38,728+287% total · +4.8% a year
- C$11,853+18.5% total · +0.6% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 727 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of BMO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- MFG$46,041+360% total · +35.7% a year
- MFC$28,001+180% total · +22.9% a year
- CM$25,433+154% total · +20.5% a year
- RY$23,646+136% total · +18.8% a year
- JPM$22,905+129% total · +18.0% a year
- TD$21,998+120% total · +17.1% a year
- C$21,876+119% total · +16.9% a year
- BMO$20,733+107% total · +15.7% a year
- BNS$19,504+95.0% total · +14.3% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
BMO at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- BMO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1994 was 68.5%, from November 2007 to February 2009. It took 13 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, BMO's best was 2009, when it returned 121%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 52.0%. It lost money in nine of those years.
- BMO is 9.9% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $116B
- Industry
- Banks - Diversified
- Price history from
- October 1994
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +37.6%total return
- Past 3 years
- +146%+35.0% a year
- Past 5 years
- +89.4%+13.6% a year
- Past 10 years
- +295%+14.7% a year
- Best calendar year
- +121%2009
- Worst calendar year
- −52.0%2008
- Losing years
- 9 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 21.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.71return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −68.5%Nov 2007 to Feb 2009
- From its all-time high
- −9.9%below the peak
BMO against the whole market
Where BMO ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does BMO rank among all stocks?
This section ranks BMO on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how BMO stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- BMO is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 5% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | BMO | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +37.6% | 786 of 3,287 | top 24% |
| 3-year return | +146% | 623 of 3,017 | top 21% |
| 5-year return | +89.4% | 741 of 2,893 | top 26% |
| 10-year return | +295% | 598 of 2,202 | top 27% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 21.4% | 133 of 2,893 | top 5% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.71 | 447 of 2,893 | top 15% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −51.0% | 495 of 2,187 | top 23% |
What has beaten BMO on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). BMO sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than BMO with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Seven stocks and 32 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than BMO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half BMO's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 48% less than BMO's 21.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.71 for BMO. DXJ earned the most, 26.6% a year, while still swinging less than BMO (19.1% against 21.4%).
- Among BMO's popular alternatives, RY and TD are in the region. RY earned 17.3% a year against 13.6% a year for BMO, at 18.2% volatility, 15% less than BMO's 21.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to BMO; faint dots are 21 more of the 39 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than BMO?
Investments that beat BMO over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among BMO's popular alternatives, RY and TD earned more than BMO with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 13.6% a year at 21.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MFG (banks) earned more for the risk it took than BMO over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 45.7%, against 51.0% for BMO.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 39 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than BMO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them KO, RY and TD.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat BMO over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks BMO's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than BMO follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than BMO's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× BMO's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than BMO's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with BMO?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.65 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 4 shownThe investments people most often weigh against BMO. 4 of 19 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.78 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.73 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.81 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.65 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Banks and the categories next to it (Regional Banks, Capital Markets, Payment Processing, Asset Management), plus BMO's specific themes. 11 of 125 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.6% | 30.6% | 1.10 | −45.7% | +345% | 0.41 | — | ||
CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.04 | — | |
| Higher return in most periods | +33.2% | 29.4% | 1.13 | −54.9% | +483% | 0.35 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.32 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +24.7% | 31.1% | 0.87 | −74.4% | +339% | 0.55 | — | ||
| Smaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 22.9% | 0.64 | −36.4% | +429% | 0.48 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 246 of 3,489 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.25 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.29 | — | ||
NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.56 | 0.70% | |
IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.60 | 0.40% | |
SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.56 | 0.13% | |
RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.39 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.50 | — | ||
FNDXSchwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.5% | 14.9% | 0.93 | −37.7% | +291% | 0.73 | 0.25% | |
What these numbers mean for BMO
- Annual return
- BMO returned 13.6% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $18,900. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- BMO's volatility over the past 5 years was 21.4%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BMO's return lands within 21.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- BMO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.71, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BMO earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- BMO's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 51.0%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 51.0% fall takes a 104% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, BMO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.65 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BMO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BMO holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 39 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than BMO with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 27 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with BMO | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Popular alternative | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.78 | — | |
| 2 | Popular alternative | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.73 | — | |
| 3 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.56 | 0.70% |
| 4 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.60 | 0.40% |
| 5 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.33 | 0.48% |
| 6 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.61 | 0.40% |
| 7 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.27 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | 0.12 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.63 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.15 | 0.80% |
| 11 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.44 | — |
| 12 | DFIVDimensional - International Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +14.8% | 16.4% | 0.93 | −25.4% | — | 0.71 | 0.27% |
| 13 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.69 | 0.56% |
| 14 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.70 | 0.15% |
| 15 | PPAInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETF · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 18.9% | 0.90 | −43.9% | +344% | 0.51 | 0.58% |
| 16 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.52 | 0.95% |
| 17 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.38 | — | |
| 18 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.56 | 0.45% |
| 19 | FFLCFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +15.7% | 16.8% | 0.95 | −19.7% | — | 0.65 | 0.38% |
| 20 | IUSInvesco RAFI Strategic US ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.7% | 14.9% | 1.00 | −34.7% | — | 0.70 | 0.19% |
| 21 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.37 | 0.45% |
| 22 | EWJViShares MSCI Japan Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.2% | 0.86 | −30.1% | — | 0.54 | 0.15% |
| 23 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.37 | — | |
| 24 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.48 | — |
| 25 | AMLPAlerian MLP ETF · Energy Equity | Whole market | +16.1% | 18.9% | 0.89 | −72.9% | +91.0% | 0.34 | 1.01% |
| 26 | MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy | Whole market | +18.6% | 19.7% | 0.97 | −64.6% | +186% | 0.48 | 0.45% |
| 27 | EWPiShares MSCI Spain ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +19.2% | 20.3% | 0.97 | −46.4% | +196% | 0.63 | 0.50% |
BMO against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against BMO, compared period by period and year by year.
How do BMO's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at BMO, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only RY and TD were both more rewarding and calmer than BMO over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- 11 of the 19 popular alternatives earned less than BMO over the past 5 years while swinging more, the weaker corner of the map.
- Over the past 5 years, BMO returned 13.6% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (21.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than BMO with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | +22.6% | 24.0% |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | +19.2% | 21.6% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | +17.3% | 24.3% |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | +17.3% | 18.2% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | +15.8% | 20.0% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | +15.1% | 29.4% |
| BMO This pageBank of Montreal | +13.6% | 21.4% |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | +13.1% | 29.5% |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | +12.8% | 19.9% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | +11.7% | 19.4% |
| MTB M&T Bank Corporation | +9.8% | 29.7% |
| FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | +6.8% | 31.4% |
| PNC The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | +4.6% | 26.8% |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | +4.0% | 26.6% |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | +3.9% | 31.1% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | +3.6% | 31.9% |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | +3.3% | 29.6% |
| HBAN Huntington Bancshares Incorporated | +3.0% | 31.2% |
| BNT Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. | +1.2% | 31.5% |
| TFC Truist Financial Corporation | −1.2% | 31.6% |
Has BMO consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares BMO with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than BMO helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Four of the 20 popular alternatives, led by MFC, CM and RY, outperformed BMO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- MFC outperformed BMO in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- RY, CM and TD earned more for the risk they took than BMO (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than BMO over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| BMO Bank of Montreal (this page) | — | −5.5% | −5.3% | +10.8% | +29.7% | +37.6% | +146% | +89.4% | +295% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | — | $116B | — |
| MFC QualifiedManulife Financial Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −0.2% | +5.5% | +17.4% | +26.1% | +44.8% | +189% | +177% | +373% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | — | $74B | — |
| CM QualifiedCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 3/5 short3/3 long | −2.0% | −3.3% | +4.3% | +25.8% | +44.4% | +261% | +141% | +395% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | — | $103B | — |
| RY QualifiedRoyal Bank of Canada | 3/5 short3/3 long | −3.5% | −4.8% | +12.0% | +18.9% | +39.2% | +173% | +122% | +352% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | — | $276B | — |
| TD QualifiedThe Toronto-Dominion Bank | 5/5 short2/3 long | −0.9% | +2.1% | +16.3% | +33.1% | +57.5% | +141% | +109% | +310% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | — | $206B | — |
| JPM Banks - DiversifiedJPMorgan Chase & Co. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −4.3% | −0.6% | +6.8% | +5.0% | +13.0% | +150% | +122% | +537% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | — | $891B | — |
| C Banks - DiversifiedCitigroup Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −9.3% | −4.3% | −7.0% | +4.8% | +26.0% | +238% | +102% | +234% | 29.4% | 0.63 | −56.5% | — | $206B | — |
| BNS Banks - DiversifiedThe Bank of Nova Scotia | 4/5 short1/3 long | −2.3% | +6.9% | +22.4% | +28.9% | +50.0% | +162% | +83.1% | +187% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | — | $112B | — |
| FITB Banks - RegionalFifth Third Bancorp | 1/5 short1/3 long | −0.9% | −7.9% | +4.4% | +12.5% | +29.6% | +151% | +38.9% | +255% | 31.4% | 0.37 | −64.0% | — | $48B | — |
| SLF Insurance - DiversifiedSun Life Financial Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | −2.2% | −0.4% | +15.2% | +30.4% | +35.5% | +96.3% | +74.1% | +255% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | — | $44B | — |
| BAM Asset ManagementBrookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −0.6% | −2.1% | −4.5% | −11.4% | −12.5% | +67.9% | — | — | — | — | −30.4% | — | $73B | — |
| PNC Banks - RegionalThe PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −4.4% | −10.8% | −1.0% | +7.9% | +25.3% | +120% | +25.1% | +230% | 26.8% | 0.30 | −49.6% | — | $88B | — |
| BN Asset ManagementBrookfield Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.7% | −11.8% | −19.8% | −19.6% | −16.8% | +85.9% | +20.8% | +226% | 31.1% | 0.28 | −51.4% | — | $83B | — |
| MTB Banks - RegionalM&T Bank Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.8% | −11.9% | +0.7% | +9.2% | +23.4% | +111% | +59.3% | +143% | 29.7% | 0.46 | −53.0% | — | $32B | — |
| WFC Banks - DiversifiedWells Fargo & Company | 1/5 short0/3 long | −5.0% | −4.3% | +1.4% | −12.3% | −2.4% | +119% | +85.0% | +141% | 29.5% | 0.57 | −64.5% | — | $248B | — |
| HBAN Banks - RegionalHuntington Bancshares Incorporated | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.1% | −13.1% | −7.2% | −8.5% | +1.9% | +82.4% | +16.1% | +132% | 31.2% | 0.25 | −55.0% | — | $31B | — |
| USB Banks - RegionalU.S. Bancorp | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.3% | −5.5% | +5.5% | +12.7% | +30.3% | +117% | +17.6% | +94.6% | 29.6% | 0.26 | −52.1% | — | $92B | — |
| TFC Banks - RegionalTruist Financial Corporation | 1/5 short0/3 long | −3.4% | −6.3% | −5.0% | −1.9% | +13.6% | +102% | −5.7% | +82.7% | 31.6% | 0.12 | −59.1% | — | $58B | — |
| BNT Insurance - DiversifiedBrookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −1.8% | −11.8% | −19.7% | −19.6% | −16.7% | +85.8% | +5.9% | — | 31.5% | 0.19 | −48.9% | — | $12B | — |
| BAC Banks - DiversifiedBank of America Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −12.6% | −15.8% | −5.2% | −8.0% | −0.6% | +107% | +21.6% | +282% | 26.6% | 0.28 | −49.0% | — | $354B | — |
| SCHW Financial - Capital MarketsThe Charles Schwab Corporation | 0/5 short0/3 long | −15.0% | −11.1% | −1.8% | −9.6% | −3.1% | +86.2% | +19.1% | +221% | 31.9% | 0.27 | −51.1% | — | $157B | — |
How did BMO do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where BMO ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with BMO and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- BMO finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 13 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, RY came out ahead of BMO most often, in 17 of the 29 years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, BMO finished in the top quarter in seven of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 6 of 21.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of BMO; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places BMO among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of BMO | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMO This pageBank of Montreal | — | +39.6% | +3.0% | +14.6% | −12.4% | +46.9% | +3.3% | +23.9% | −14.9% | +15.4% | +32.9% | −16.8% | +10.4% | +13.7% | +17.3% | −0.3% | +13.7% | +121% | −51.9% | −0.4% | +9.4% | +20.4% | +21.0% | +62.9% | +23.0% | −9.6% | +62.5% | −10.8% | −6.1% | +44.8% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 7 of 29 | 6 of 21 | 20 of 21 | 10 of 21 | 8 of 20 | 6 of 19 | 6 of 19 | 12 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 12 of 19 | 5 of 19 | 15 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 16 of 19 | 16 of 19 | 4 of 19 | 12 of 19 | 1 of 19 | 13 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 16 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 8 of 19 | 2 of 19 | 2 of 19 | 13 of 19 | 4 of 18 | 11 of 16 | 13 of 16 | 12 of 15 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 16 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 12 of 26 | +22.9% | +45.2% | +31.0% | −1.3% | +12.1% | −7.1% | +49.2% | −29.3% | +20.9% | +23.6% | −19.0% | −0.6% | +49.7% | +33.5% | −36.0% | −3.3% | +12.5% | −56.9% | +23.2% | +17.2% | +29.8% | +45.7% | +51.7% | −15.4% | −16.0% | +152% | — | — | — |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 12 of 28 | +49.0% | +37.9% | +26.5% | −26.8% | +44.7% | +9.3% | +20.3% | −19.8% | +23.5% | +29.8% | −19.6% | +4.8% | +11.0% | +16.8% | −3.3% | +27.1% | +64.3% | −37.9% | −12.0% | +32.5% | +13.7% | +26.0% | +87.9% | −14.9% | +14.2% | +38.0% | +1.2% | −17.2% | — |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 17 of 29 | +46.3% | +23.8% | +12.2% | −8.0% | +34.1% | +8.4% | +20.2% | −12.9% | +23.9% | +31.8% | −19.3% | +6.7% | +16.0% | +23.3% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +89.3% | −39.4% | +10.7% | +26.0% | +50.7% | +15.9% | +33.6% | +15.8% | −0.9% | +58.5% | −9.5% | −3.5% | +54.8% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 17 of 29 | +85.3% | −13.4% | +4.5% | −12.2% | +41.3% | +5.6% | +17.5% | −12.1% | +22.9% | +30.9% | −14.9% | +5.0% | +16.1% | +16.8% | +4.1% | +22.7% | +85.4% | −46.8% | +20.4% | +16.1% | +30.7% | +29.7% | +61.4% | −11.7% | −7.2% | +11.2% | +58.4% | −2.9% | +52.7% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 13 of 29 | +37.3% | +44.3% | +30.6% | −12.6% | +27.8% | −5.5% | +47.3% | −6.6% | +26.8% | +34.5% | +8.4% | +9.9% | +36.7% | +36.2% | −19.9% | +2.3% | +34.4% | −25.1% | −6.9% | +25.7% | +5.7% | +10.0% | +60.5% | −30.7% | −17.4% | −10.1% | +11.7% | +32.9% | +25.5% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 13 of 29 | +70.4% | +41.9% | +19.0% | −22.1% | +0.9% | −19.7% | +57.9% | −28.5% | +27.0% | +15.9% | −4.1% | +3.9% | +31.8% | +50.5% | −44.3% | +42.9% | −50.6% | −75.9% | −44.8% | +19.6% | +4.6% | +2.8% | +41.6% | −20.4% | +0.1% | +23.6% | +70.2% | −6.8% | +79.9% |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 13 of 26 | +45.1% | +17.5% | +6.0% | −28.8% | +40.6% | +1.7% | +17.5% | −19.2% | +20.5% | +43.7% | −25.1% | −4.2% | +11.5% | +21.0% | −9.6% | +27.1% | +82.6% | −44.4% | +16.6% | +16.8% | +21.4% | +40.4% | +59.9% | +232% | +17.5% | +25.4% | — | — | — |
| FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | 13 of 29 | +14.8% | +27.2% | +10.4% | −21.9% | +62.4% | −5.4% | +35.2% | −20.3% | +15.1% | +37.9% | +1.3% | −0.8% | +41.9% | +22.5% | −11.3% | +51.2% | +18.9% | −65.6% | −35.5% | +13.0% | −17.3% | −17.9% | +3.0% | −3.0% | +4.1% | +23.8% | +4.3% | +32.4% | +97.8% |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 9 of 25 | +9.7% | +19.5% | +16.9% | −12.9% | +29.7% | +2.0% | +42.7% | −16.6% | +10.3% | +27.6% | −10.2% | +5.9% | +39.3% | +52.5% | −34.9% | +10.2% | +31.1% | −57.0% | +35.5% | +8.2% | +22.7% | +38.3% | +51.6% | −18.9% | −17.2% | — | — | — | — |
| BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 2 of 3 | −0.3% | +39.7% | +45.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PNC The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 12 of 29 | +12.2% | +29.4% | +2.7% | −18.6% | +38.2% | −2.8% | +40.9% | −17.0% | +26.0% | +25.8% | +6.8% | +20.3% | +36.4% | +3.6% | −3.1% | +15.8% | +10.2% | −22.2% | −8.3% | +23.6% | +11.7% | +8.9% | +36.2% | −22.5% | −20.7% | +70.4% | −15.0% | −2.2% | +56.7% |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | 17 of 29 | +20.6% | +44.1% | +29.1% | −35.0% | +48.9% | +8.5% | +52.3% | −10.7% | +34.2% | +8.0% | −4.4% | +31.1% | +11.5% | +53.5% | −16.3% | +53.6% | +49.6% | −56.5% | +12.3% | +45.8% | +42.7% | +81.4% | +54.9% | +19.6% | +32.2% | +16.8% | +4.1% | −18.2% | +28.5% |
| MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 12 of 29 | +10.4% | +41.7% | −1.7% | −2.9% | +24.3% | −22.2% | +21.6% | −14.6% | +10.8% | +32.2% | −1.3% | +10.4% | +21.3% | +33.2% | −9.1% | +34.8% | +23.1% | −27.0% | −31.5% | +14.2% | +2.8% | +11.6% | +25.6% | +10.4% | +8.6% | +66.3% | −19.4% | +12.5% | +62.8% |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 13 of 29 | +35.6% | +46.5% | +22.9% | −11.9% | +61.1% | −41.6% | +21.4% | −21.8% | +13.2% | +4.7% | +1.8% | +24.1% | +36.7% | +27.3% | −9.6% | +15.7% | −6.3% | +1.7% | −12.1% | +16.9% | +4.5% | +9.0% | +29.5% | +10.3% | −20.2% | +40.5% | +3.3% | +5.1% | +81.9% |
| HBAN Huntington Bancshares Incorporated | 12 of 29 | +10.8% | +33.7% | −4.6% | −4.5% | +27.1% | −11.2% | +31.8% | −15.2% | +12.9% | +23.0% | +7.5% | +11.6% | +54.1% | +19.5% | −18.4% | +89.5% | −51.5% | −44.2% | −34.3% | +4.3% | −0.4% | +13.4% | +24.3% | +12.5% | +11.0% | −22.1% | −10.1% | −5.8% | +54.1% |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | 14 of 29 | +16.4% | +15.6% | +4.8% | −19.1% | +24.3% | −17.9% | +33.6% | −12.4% | +6.6% | +23.4% | −2.8% | +13.8% | +29.6% | +20.9% | +2.3% | +20.7% | −9.0% | −16.6% | −8.0% | +26.3% | −0.5% | +10.6% | +45.3% | +5.3% | −6.8% | +13.2% | −30.5% | +64.5% | +90.1% |
| TFC Truist Financial Corporation | 10 of 29 | +19.1% | +23.7% | −8.6% | −23.5% | +26.1% | −11.1% | +34.6% | −10.2% | +8.7% | +28.4% | −0.1% | +6.9% | +32.7% | +18.6% | −1.9% | +5.9% | −2.0% | −4.5% | −27.2% | +8.9% | +3.4% | +12.8% | +8.1% | +5.6% | −0.4% | +40.6% | −30.6% | +28.5% | +81.3% |
| BNT Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. | 2 of 4 | +20.7% | +43.3% | +30.1% | −43.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 11 of 29 | +28.0% | +33.9% | +4.9% | −23.8% | +49.6% | −11.6% | +46.1% | −15.0% | +35.7% | +33.4% | −4.8% | +15.7% | +34.5% | +109% | −58.1% | −11.2% | +7.6% | −63.1% | −18.9% | +20.8% | +2.4% | +21.5% | +20.1% | +14.6% | +42.7% | −4.5% | −14.0% | +1.2% | +27.3% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 16 of 29 | +36.6% | +9.2% | −16.0% | +0.1% | +60.2% | +13.6% | +16.4% | −18.4% | +31.1% | +21.0% | +9.9% | +17.2% | +83.3% | +29.8% | −33.1% | −7.8% | +18.1% | −36.1% | +40.0% | +32.8% | +23.5% | +1.7% | +9.5% | −29.5% | −45.4% | +11.4% | +36.3% | +102% | +97.6% |
Risk and diversification
How BMO has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were BMO's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents BMO's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1994, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of BMO's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: BMO fell 46.6% from April 1998 to January 2000, while the S&P 500 rose 28.2%.
- The longest climb back to a previous high took 19 months, after BMO fell 34.3% from March 2022 to October 2023.
Green means BMO fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | BMO fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −68.5% | −49.5% | Nov 2007 | Feb 2009 | 15 months | Mar 2010 | 13 months |
| Covid crash | −51.0% | −32.3% | Jan 2020 | Mar 2020 | 2 months | Dec 2020 | 9 months |
| No named crash | −46.6% | +28.2% | Apr 1998 | Jan 2000 | 21 months | Jan 2001 | 12 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −34.7% | −4.5% | Sep 2014 | Jan 2016 | 16 months | Dec 2016 | 11 months |
| 2022 bear market | −34.3% | −6.4% | Mar 2022 | Oct 2023 | 19 months | May 2025 | 19 months |
How did BMO do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far BMO, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, RY held up best, falling less than BMO in seven of the ten crashes they both traded through.
- BMO fell further than the S&P 500 in six of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when BMO fell 49.4% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than BMO.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMO This pageBank of Montreal | — | −5.5% | −30.5% | −49.4% | −23.5% | −6.2% | −18.9% | −16.4% | 0.0% | −68.5% | −26.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 6 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 2 of 10 | −6.1% | −27.1% | −55.1% | −25.9% | −2.6% | −35.4% | −35.3% | 0.0% | −83.8% | −42.9% |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 3 of 10 | −7.0% | −36.2% | −43.6% | −22.2% | −5.9% | −25.3% | −12.9% | 0.0% | −71.8% | −39.8% |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 7 of 10 | −3.8% | −26.0% | −40.0% | −17.1% | −5.7% | −23.1% | −21.8% | 0.0% | −63.1% | −21.6% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 6 of 10 | −6.7% | −29.0% | −41.0% | −20.9% | −5.5% | −18.1% | −19.6% | 0.0% | −63.4% | −44.1% |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 4 of 10 | −5.4% | −37.9% | −42.5% | −21.3% | −5.6% | −22.0% | −32.1% | −0.1% | −67.7% | −74.0% |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 0 of 10 | −11.7% | −39.2% | −54.8% | −33.1% | −6.7% | −40.3% | −42.6% | −1.0% | −97.7% | −52.7% |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 5 of 10 | −4.6% | −35.4% | −43.0% | −17.7% | −6.1% | −24.3% | −19.8% | 0.0% | −63.8% | −23.6% |
| FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | 1 of 10 | −22.1% | −36.5% | −60.9% | −23.8% | −6.1% | −34.9% | −28.9% | −2.3% | −96.9% | −22.0% |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 2 of 9 | −5.5% | −30.8% | −50.2% | −20.3% | −4.5% | −23.8% | −20.3% | −1.4% | −78.8% | — |
| BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 0 of 1 | −7.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PNC The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 2 of 10 | −10.4% | −34.0% | −47.8% | −23.2% | −5.4% | −20.8% | −24.1% | −0.4% | −76.7% | −49.6% |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | 3 of 10 | −10.5% | −36.2% | −51.4% | −18.1% | −5.2% | −22.7% | −18.7% | 0.0% | −70.9% | −20.7% |
| MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 4 of 10 | −9.4% | −18.0% | −47.6% | −21.1% | −5.7% | −23.2% | −23.1% | −0.2% | −69.6% | −23.9% |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2 of 10 | −12.4% | −36.3% | −47.1% | −20.1% | −13.5% | −20.9% | −21.1% | −1.2% | −79.0% | −29.2% |
| HBAN Huntington Bancshares Incorporated | 0 of 10 | −23.0% | −31.3% | −49.6% | −28.3% | −6.1% | −31.7% | −26.2% | −3.6% | −93.9% | −37.2% |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | 3 of 10 | −19.7% | −36.8% | −47.2% | −20.4% | −7.5% | −17.7% | −24.7% | −1.2% | −76.1% | −42.8% |
| TFC Truist Financial Corporation | 3 of 10 | −26.3% | −35.8% | −53.5% | −20.1% | −6.8% | −24.4% | −27.2% | 0.0% | −66.6% | −24.8% |
| BNT Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd. | 0 of 2 | −10.8% | −39.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 1 of 10 | −12.4% | −38.7% | −47.8% | −26.4% | −6.9% | −37.8% | −45.2% | −0.6% | −93.4% | −36.3% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 2 of 10 | −31.9% | −36.9% | −41.5% | −26.5% | −8.2% | −37.0% | −28.9% | −5.5% | −56.0% | −83.1% |
How closely does BMO move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares BMO with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- TD took just 80% of the S&P 500's losses, against 112% for BMO, while still keeping 89% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, BMO captured 104% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 112% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.12. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Seven of the 18 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than BMO's 0.93, led by JPM, RY and TD.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than BMO's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMO This pageBank of Montreal | 104% | 112% | 0.93 | 1.12 |
| JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 117% | 103% | 1.14 | 1.09 |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 97% | 88% | 1.11 | 0.88 |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 89% | 80% | 1.10 | 0.88 |
| CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 108% | 106% | 1.02 | 1.07 |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 87% | 85% | 1.02 | 0.96 |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 110% | 110% | 1.00 | 1.10 |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 89% | 90% | 0.99 | 0.91 |
| FITB Fifth Third Bancorp | 102% | 114% | 0.89 | 1.22 |
| MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 75% | 86% | 0.87 | 0.86 |
| BAC Bank of America Corporation | 127% | 146% | 0.87 | 1.36 |
| PNC The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 108% | 127% | 0.85 | 1.15 |
| BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 97% | 120% | 0.81 | 1.05 |
| C Citigroup Inc. | 131% | 165% | 0.80 | 1.49 |
| BN Brookfield Corporation | 125% | 162% | 0.77 | 1.42 |
| HBAN Huntington Bancshares Incorporated | 89% | 116% | 0.76 | 1.13 |
| WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 96% | 129% | 0.75 | 1.13 |
| USB U.S. Bancorp | 89% | 130% | 0.69 | 1.05 |
| TFC Truist Financial Corporation | 86% | 126% | 0.68 | 1.11 |
What diversifies BMO?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with BMO's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing BMO with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in BMO into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 21% over the past 5 years for a small cut in its annual return (+15.7% for BMO alone, +15.3% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, MLPX and SMH have moved largely independently of BMO over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.48 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- MCK made money in five of the nine calendar years in which BMO lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which BMO lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% BMO and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2001 | 1999 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMO Bank of Montreal (this page) | 1.00 | +89.4% | 0.71 | −12.4% | −14.9% | −16.8% | −0.3% | −51.9% | −0.4% | −9.6% | −10.8% | −6.1% | 23.3% | +15.7% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.33 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | 19.6% | +18.3% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.48 | +135% | 0.97 | +21.5% | −15.5% | −35.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.7% | +17.0% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.48 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +6.8% | −44.7% | +6.0% | −14.6% | — | — | 22.8% | +20.6% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.12 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | +30.4% | — | — | — | 19.4% | +16.9% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.34 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | +2.8% | −39.0% | +36.8% | −18.2% | +18.1% | — | 21.0% | +17.8% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.34 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −12.6% | −25.7% | +10.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.2% | +16.7% |
| PTLC Broad MarketPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 0.41 | +57.4% | 0.83 | −8.6% | +1.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.7% | +15.0% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.15 | +59.7% | 0.82 | +21.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.4% | +15.3% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2007 | 2001 | 1999 | 1998 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMO Bank of Montreal (this page) | 1.00 | +89.4% | 0.71 | −12.4% | −14.9% | −16.8% | −0.3% | −51.9% | −0.4% | −9.6% | −10.8% | −6.1% | 23.3% | +15.7% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.14 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −9.8% | −2.5% | −36.8% | +51.7% | 20.1% | +20.8% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.32 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −25.6% | +350% | — | 25.0% | +33.4% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.36 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +73.7% | −58.7% | −9.5% | 23.4% | +29.3% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.05 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | +4.9% | −71.3% | +46.9% | 19.6% | +20.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.26 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.3% | +22.7% |
Common questions
What was BMO's worst drawdown?
BMO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1994 was 68.5%, from November 2007 to February 2009. It took 13 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were BMO's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, BMO's best year was 2009, when it returned 121%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -52.0%.
Is there a better investment than BMO?
Among BMO's popular alternatives, RY and TD earned more than BMO with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 13.6% a year at 21.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, MFG (banks) earned more for the risk it took than BMO over the past 5 years, and its worst fall in 10 years was 45.7%, against 51.0% for BMO.
Is BMO more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. BMO's volatility over the past 5 years was 21.4%, 1.2 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, BMO's return lands within 21.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is BMO's Sharpe ratio?
BMO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.71, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so BMO earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is BMO with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, BMO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.65 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against BMO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a BMO holding.
What are the best alternatives to BMO?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, four outperformed BMO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: MFC, CM and RY.
Did BMO outperform the S&P 500?
BMO finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 13 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +39.6%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did BMO do in stock market crashes?
BMO fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in three of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in six. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when BMO fell 49.4% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies BMO?
These had a low correlation with BMO over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.33), MLPX (correlation 0.48) and SMH (correlation 0.48); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.14), CLS (correlation 0.32) and FIX (correlation 0.36). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than BMO's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of BMO's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.