Relative Intelligence · Life Insurance

How Sun Life Financial (SLF) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on SLF alone. It places SLF (Sun Life Financial Inc.) against 19 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where SLF stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: SLF's full trading record, from March 2000 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowIts life insurance peers were far apart over the past 6 months, from CRBG (Corebridge Financial, up 32.2%) to AFL (Aflac, up 6.0%). SLF has outpaced the market, rising 15.2% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?SLF fell 0.4% over the past 3 months, in line with the life insurance ETF KIE (State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF), which fell 1.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its life insurance peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: CRBG (Corebridge Financial) rose 12.7%, while PFG (Principal Financial Group) fell 2.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, SLF rose 35.5% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (96.3% against 89.3%). Even so, SLF finished behind the S&P 500 in both 2024 and 2025. By year ↓
- Long termSLF turned $10,000 into $35,500 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Even so, over the past decade, only MFC (Manulife Financial) and AFL (Aflac) of its life insurance peers outpaced SLF. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, SLF has typically fallen 1.4 times as far as the S&P 500. The Covid crash took 50.2% off SLF, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. That was more than GL (Globe Life, 47.7%) but less than MFC (Manulife Financial, 55.1%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, SLF has a correlation of 0.67 over 5 years, more closely than 97% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is more of the same, not a cushion. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- RY (Royal Bank of Canada) earned more than SLF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 11.7% a year at 19.4%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway, insurance) earned more than SLF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.4% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 11.7% a year at 19.4%.
- Whole market
- 76 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SLF with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF), BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway) and BRK-A (Berkshire Hathaway).
How much would $10,000 in SLF have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in SLF over the past 26 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of SLF over the same span and SLF's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in SLF at the end of September 2000 would have grown to $101,648 by September 2026, more than the $84,332 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of SLF, and BLK finished highest, at $562,061.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2000 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 574 of the 1,261 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SLF; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BLK$562,061+5,521% total · +16.8% a year
- RY$339,535+3,295% total · +14.5% a year
- TD$220,226+2,102% total · +12.6% a year
- GL$170,782+1,608% total · +11.5% a year
- AFL$118,413+1,084% total · +10.0% a year
- SLF$101,648+916% total · +9.3% a year
- MFC$98,587+886% total · +9.2% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$84,332+743% total · +8.5% a year
- MET$74,791+648% total · +8.0% a year
- UNM$60,632+506% total · +7.2% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 936 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of SLF; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- JXN$63,053+531% total · +44.5% a year
- UNM$40,709+307% total · +32.4% a year
- MFC$28,001+180% total · +22.9% a year
- AFL$24,008+140% total · +19.1% a year
- RY$23,646+136% total · +18.8% a year
- TD$21,998+120% total · +17.1% a year
- AMP$20,051+101% total · +14.9% a year
- EQH$19,636+96.4% total · +14.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- SLF$18,746+87.5% total · +13.4% a year
SLF at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- SLF's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 78.8%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 25 full calendar years, SLF's best was 2012, when it returned 52.5%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 57.0%. It lost money in seven of those years.
- SLF is 4.4% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $44B
- Industry
- Insurance - Diversified
- Price history from
- March 2000
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +35.5%total return
- Past 3 years
- +96.3%+25.2% a year
- Past 5 years
- +74.1%+11.7% a year
- Past 10 years
- +255%+13.5% a year
- Best calendar year
- +52.5%2012
- Worst calendar year
- −57.0%2008
- Losing years
- 7 of 25full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 19.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.67return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −78.8%Oct 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- −4.4%below the peak
SLF against the whole market
Where SLF ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does SLF rank among all stocks?
This section ranks SLF on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how SLF stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- SLF is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 3% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | SLF | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +35.5% | 839 of 3,287 | top 26% |
| 3-year return | +96.3% | 950 of 3,017 | top 31% |
| 5-year return | +74.1% | 869 of 2,893 | top 30% |
| 10-year return | +255% | 699 of 2,202 | top 32% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 19.4% | 79 of 2,893 | top 3% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.67 | 524 of 2,893 | top 18% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −50.8% | 493 of 2,187 | top 23% |
What has beaten SLF on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). SLF sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than SLF with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- Seven stocks and 69 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than SLF over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 2% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half SLF's swings, LVHI has the best return for its risk: 17.0% a year at 11.1% volatility, 43% less than SLF's 19.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.48 against 0.67 for SLF. SDCI earned the most, 20.6% a year, while still swinging less than SLF (18.4% against 19.4%).
- Among SLF's popular alternatives, RY is in the region. RY earned 17.3% a year against 11.7% a year for SLF, at 18.2% volatility, 6% less than SLF's 19.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to SLF; faint dots are 39 more of the 76 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× SLF's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than SLF?
Investments that beat SLF over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among SLF's popular alternatives, RY earned more than SLF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 11.7% a year at 19.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, BRK-B (insurance) earned more than SLF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.4% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 11.7% a year at 19.4%.
- Across the whole market, 76 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than SLF with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them VOO, BRK-B and BRK-A.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat SLF over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks SLF's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than SLF follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than SLF's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× SLF's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than SLF's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with SLF?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +11.7% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | +255% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.67 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against SLF. 7 of 16 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.68 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.66 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.73 | — | ||
UNMUnum Group · Life Insurance | Higher return in most periods | +30.6% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | +256% | 0.19 | — | |
JXNJackson Financial Inc. · Life Insurance | Higher return in most periods | +41.7% | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | — | 0.31 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatility | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Life Insurance and Insurance and the categories next to it (Property & Casualty Insurance, Asset Management, Retirement Services), plus SLF's specific themes. 14 of 64 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.49 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.53 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.57 | — | ||
THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.42 | — | |
WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.39 | — | |
AIZAssurant, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher return in most periods | +13.3% | 25.3% | 0.62 | −44.6% | +312% | 0.45 | — | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 271 of 3,553 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.8% | 17.0% | 0.80 | −33.9% | +324% | 0.67 | 0.03% | ||
VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.57 | 0.15% | |
DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.66 | 0.05% | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.09 | — | ||
IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.62 | 0.40% | |
RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co. · Metals & Mining | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +24.8% | 28.1% | 0.93 | −40.8% | +626% | 0.35 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +10.9% | 13.7% | 0.83 | −35.1% | +267% | 0.68 | 0.08% | ||
NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.56 | 0.70% | |
What these numbers mean for SLF
- Annual return
- SLF returned 11.7% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $17,400. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- SLF's volatility over the past 5 years was 19.4%, 1.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SLF's return lands within 19.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- SLF's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.67, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SLF earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- SLF's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 50.8%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 50.8% fall takes a 103% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, SLF's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.67 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SLF instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SLF holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 76 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than SLF with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 47 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with SLF | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +12.8% | 17.0% | 0.80 | −33.9% | +324% | 0.67 | 0.03% | |
| 2 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.57 | 0.15% |
| 3 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.66 | 0.05% |
| 4 | Same or nearby category | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.49 | — | |
| 5 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.62 | 0.40% |
| 6 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.57 | 0.40% |
| 7 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.39 | — | |
| 8 | Popular alternative | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.68 | — | |
| 9 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.70 | 0.19% |
| 10 | DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF · International | Whole market | +13.8% | 15.1% | 0.94 | −34.4% | +261% | 0.72 | 0.50% |
| 11 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.65 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.15 | 0.80% |
| 13 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +157% | 0.67 | 0.31% |
| 14 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.49 | — |
| 15 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.66 | 0.25% |
| 16 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.65 | 0.15% |
| 17 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.67 | 0.56% |
| 18 | HDViShares Core High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +12.9% | 13.0% | 1.00 | −37.0% | +172% | 0.49 | 0.08% |
| 19 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.58 | 0.36% |
| 20 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.69 | 0.39% |
| 21 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +253% | 0.67 | 0.15% |
| 22 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.64 | 0.35% |
| 23 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.47 | 0.43% |
| 24 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.69 | 0.12% |
| 25 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.56 | 0.95% |
| 26 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.65 | 0.12% |
| 27 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.51 | 0.60% |
| 28 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.71 | 0.25% |
| 29 | FTGCFirst Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund · Alternatives | Whole market | +12.9% | 15.6% | 0.86 | −35.9% | +139% | 0.10 | 0.98% |
| 30 | WTVWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.0% | 0.83 | −42.2% | +303% | 0.65 | 0.12% |
| 31 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.66 | 0.09% |
| 32 | HDEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +12.8% | 14.2% | 0.92 | −36.4% | +134% | 0.64 | 0.09% |
| 33 | FLQLFranklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.8% | 16.3% | 0.88 | −33.6% | — | 0.65 | 0.15% |
| 34 | PWVInvesco Large Cap Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.2% | 0.97 | −37.6% | +223% | 0.65 | 0.55% |
| 35 | AUSFGlobal X - Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF · International | Whole market | +13.2% | 13.6% | 0.99 | −44.2% | — | 0.53 | 0.27% |
| 36 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.6% | 0.85 | −41.3% | — | 0.63 | 0.18% |
| 37 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.59 | 0.50% |
| 38 | DTHWisdomTree International High Dividend Fund · International | Whole market | +13.0% | 15.1% | 0.89 | −40.8% | +131% | 0.63 | 0.58% |
| 39 | EWJViShares MSCI Japan Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.2% | 0.86 | −30.1% | — | 0.49 | 0.15% |
| 40 | Whole market | +12.7% | 17.9% | 0.76 | −27.4% | +196% | 0.19 | — | |
| 41 | FYLDCambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.0% | 0.85 | −44.6% | +203% | 0.59 | 0.59% |
| 42 | SIXAETC 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +12.8% | 12.7% | 1.01 | −18.4% | — | 0.63 | 0.31% |
| 43 | IDOGALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 15.6% | 0.93 | −37.3% | +180% | 0.59 | 0.50% |
| 44 | VSLUApplied Finance Valuation Large Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.7% | 16.2% | 0.88 | −23.8% | — | 0.64 | 0.49% |
| 45 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.38 | — | |
| 46 | MLPAGlobal X - MLP ETF · Energy | Whole market | +15.2% | 17.2% | 0.91 | −74.3% | +80.0% | 0.36 | 0.77% |
| 47 | TPYPTortoise North American Pipeline ETF · Energy | Whole market | +16.9% | 17.3% | 0.99 | −51.9% | +184% | 0.52 | 0.40% |
SLF against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against SLF, compared period by period and year by year.
How do SLF's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at SLF, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only RY was both more rewarding and calmer than SLF over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, SLF returned 11.7% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (19.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than SLF with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| JXN Jackson Financial Inc. | +41.7% | 43.3% |
| UNM Unum Group | +30.6% | 29.3% |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | +22.6% | 24.0% |
| AFL Aflac Incorporated | +19.0% | 20.8% |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | +17.3% | 18.2% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | +15.8% | 20.0% |
| PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | +13.0% | 26.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc. | +12.6% | 32.9% |
| GL Globe Life Inc. | +12.4% | 35.6% |
| AMP Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | +12.1% | 27.8% |
| MET MetLife, Inc. | +12.0% | 25.4% |
| SLF This pageSun Life Financial Inc. | +11.7% | 19.4% |
| VOYA Voya Financial, Inc. | +8.8% | 28.9% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | +7.1% | 27.1% |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | +5.2% | 25.5% |
| BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | −1.7% | 42.6% |
| LNC Lincoln National Corporation | −7.4% | 42.7% |
Has SLF consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares SLF with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than SLF helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Five of the 19 popular alternatives, led by TD, MFC and JXN, outperformed SLF in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- TD and MFC outperformed SLF in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- JXN, RY and TD earned more for the risk they took than SLF (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than SLF over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. (this page) | — | −2.2% | −0.4% | +15.2% | +30.4% | +35.5% | +96.3% | +74.1% | +255% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | — | $44B | — |
| TD QualifiedThe Toronto-Dominion Bank | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −0.9% | +2.1% | +16.3% | +33.1% | +57.5% | +141% | +109% | +310% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | — | $206B | — |
| MFC QualifiedManulife Financial Corporation | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −0.2% | +5.5% | +17.4% | +26.1% | +44.8% | +189% | +177% | +373% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | — | $74B | — |
| JXN QualifiedJackson Financial Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | −1.1% | +6.7% | +18.9% | +24.3% | +37.6% | +269% | +472% | — | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | — | $8.8B | — |
| UNM QualifiedUnum Group | 3/5 short2/3 long | −0.1% | +5.8% | +19.3% | +23.2% | +26.4% | +106% | +279% | +256% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | — | $15B | — |
| EQH QualifiedEquitable Holdings, Inc. | 3/5 short2/3 long | +0.3% | +13.0% | +31.5% | +15.0% | +15.6% | +116% | +81.1% | — | 32.9% | 0.53 | −61.3% | — | $15B | — |
| RY Banks - DiversifiedRoyal Bank of Canada | 1/5 short3/3 long | −3.5% | −4.8% | +12.0% | +18.9% | +39.2% | +173% | +122% | +352% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | — | $276B | — |
| AFL Insurance - LifeAflac Incorporated | 1/5 short2/3 long | +4.4% | −2.6% | +6.0% | +10.8% | +12.9% | +65.2% | +139% | +335% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | — | $60B | — |
| AMP Asset ManagementAmeriprise Financial, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | −9.0% | −7.0% | +7.5% | −0.3% | +4.5% | +62.6% | +76.8% | +507% | 27.8% | 0.55 | −53.9% | — | $43B | — |
| MET Insurance - LifeMetLife, Inc. | 3/5 short1/3 long | +4.7% | +9.5% | +32.0% | +28.6% | +32.2% | +84.0% | +76.5% | +240% | 25.4% | 0.58 | −55.2% | — | $64B | — |
| BLK Asset ManagementBlackRock, Inc. | 2/5 short1/3 long | +3.5% | +7.6% | +8.8% | +5.7% | −0.6% | +96.3% | +41.1% | +313% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | — | $175B | — |
| PFG Asset ManagementPrincipal Financial Group, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −7.3% | −2.9% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +41.4% | +76.3% | +84.6% | +196% | 26.5% | 0.60 | −64.7% | — | $23B | — |
| GL Insurance - LifeGlobe Life Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −1.2% | −7.7% | +12.8% | +23.6% | +26.3% | +58.0% | +79.7% | +188% | 35.6% | 0.56 | −61.6% | — | $13B | — |
| LNC Insurance - LifeLincoln National Corporation | 0/5 short1/3 long | −4.1% | −3.9% | +9.0% | −8.0% | +6.2% | +111% | −32.1% | +20.1% | 42.7% | 0.04 | −79.2% | — | $7.6B | — |
| CRBG Asset ManagementCorebridge Financial, Inc. | 3/5 short0/3 long | +0.4% | +12.7% | +32.2% | +18.2% | +13.8% | +98.8% | — | — | — | — | −36.3% | — | $16B | — |
| VOYA Insurance - LifeVoya Financial, Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −4.9% | −2.6% | +28.0% | +28.6% | +32.6% | +55.8% | +52.3% | +253% | 28.9% | 0.44 | −52.1% | — | $8.7B | — |
| BAM Asset ManagementBrookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −0.6% | −2.1% | −4.5% | −11.4% | −12.5% | +67.9% | — | — | — | — | −30.4% | — | $73B | — |
| PRU Insurance - LifePrudential Financial, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.8% | −1.2% | +15.2% | +5.2% | +19.6% | +47.5% | +29.0% | +117% | 25.5% | 0.33 | −65.9% | — | $40B | — |
| BHF Insurance - LifeBrighthouse Financial, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.4% | −26.6% | −23.0% | −26.2% | +2.2% | +3.1% | −8.1% | — | 42.6% | 0.17 | −76.9% | — | $2.7B | — |
| FG Insurance - LifeF&G Annuities & Life, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −11.9% | −33.9% | −24.1% | −30.9% | −29.0% | −25.8% | — | — | — | — | −58.8% | — | $2.7B | — |
How did SLF do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2001, along with where SLF ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with SLF and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- SLF finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 12 of its 25 full calendar years, and behind it in each of the last three.
- Among its popular alternatives, EQH came out ahead of SLF most often, in six of the seven years both traded.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, SLF finished in the top quarter in four of 25 years and in the bottom quarter in six. In 2025, it ranked 10 of 20.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of SLF; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places SLF among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of SLF | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLF This pageSun Life Financial Inc. | — | +9.7% | +19.5% | +16.9% | −12.9% | +29.7% | +2.0% | +42.7% | −16.6% | +10.3% | +27.6% | −10.2% | +5.9% | +39.3% | +52.5% | −34.9% | +10.2% | +31.1% | −57.0% | +35.5% | +8.2% | +22.7% | +38.3% | +51.6% | −18.9% | −17.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 4 of 25 | 10 of 20 | 13 of 20 | 11 of 20 | 15 of 17 | 11 of 16 | 6 of 16 | 5 of 16 | 5 of 15 | 13 of 14 | 8 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 7 of 14 | 10 of 13 | 1 of 13 | 12 of 13 | 10 of 13 | 7 of 13 | 10 of 13 | 3 of 13 | 11 of 13 | 7 of 12 | 3 of 12 | 3 of 12 | 10 of 12 | 9 of 10 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 13 of 25 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 16 of 25 | +85.3% | −13.4% | +4.5% | −12.2% | +41.3% | +5.6% | +17.5% | −12.1% | +22.9% | +30.9% | −14.9% | +5.0% | +16.1% | +16.8% | +4.1% | +22.7% | +85.4% | −46.8% | +20.4% | +16.1% | +30.7% | +29.7% | +61.4% | −11.7% | −7.2% |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 12 of 25 | +22.9% | +45.2% | +31.0% | −1.3% | +12.1% | −7.1% | +49.2% | −29.3% | +20.9% | +23.6% | −19.0% | −0.6% | +49.7% | +33.5% | −36.0% | −3.3% | +12.5% | −56.9% | +23.2% | +17.2% | +29.8% | +45.7% | +51.7% | −15.4% | −16.0% |
| JXN Jackson Financial Inc. | 4 of 4 | +26.9% | +76.4% | +57.2% | −11.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| UNM Unum Group | 11 of 25 | +8.6% | +66.3% | +13.7% | +73.5% | +11.9% | −16.2% | +2.7% | −45.2% | +27.2% | +35.1% | −2.6% | +1.2% | +71.9% | +0.9% | −11.6% | +25.9% | +6.9% | −20.6% | +16.1% | −7.4% | +28.9% | +16.0% | −7.6% | −32.1% | +0.8% |
| EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc. | 6 of 7 | +3.2% | +45.0% | +19.6% | −10.2% | +31.0% | +6.5% | +53.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 16 of 25 | +46.3% | +23.8% | +12.2% | −8.0% | +34.1% | +8.4% | +20.2% | −12.9% | +23.9% | +31.8% | −19.3% | +6.7% | +16.0% | +23.3% | +1.2% | +1.4% | +89.3% | −39.4% | +10.7% | +26.0% | +50.7% | +15.9% | +33.6% | +15.8% | −0.9% |
| AFL Aflac Incorporated | 11 of 25 | +8.9% | +28.1% | +17.3% | +26.4% | +34.6% | −13.6% | +18.6% | +6.2% | +29.0% | +19.1% | +0.5% | −6.2% | +28.9% | +26.4% | −21.3% | +24.8% | +4.3% | −25.5% | +38.3% | +0.4% | +17.6% | +11.2% | +21.4% | +23.7% | −31.6% |
| AMP Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 13 of 20 | −6.7% | +42.1% | +24.0% | +5.0% | +57.9% | +19.8% | +64.0% | −36.8% | +56.4% | +7.7% | −17.8% | +17.2% | +88.4% | +29.5% | −12.3% | +50.7% | +70.6% | −56.9% | +2.1% | +34.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| MET MetLife, Inc. | 12 of 25 | −0.8% | +27.7% | −5.5% | +19.2% | +37.5% | −3.4% | +28.8% | −15.8% | +8.4% | +15.9% | −8.3% | +3.0% | +67.5% | +7.9% | −28.3% | +27.9% | +3.7% | −42.2% | +5.6% | +21.7% | +22.2% | +21.8% | +25.4% | −13.9% | −8.8% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 16 of 25 | +6.6% | +29.3% | +17.9% | −20.4% | +29.4% | +47.2% | +31.9% | −21.6% | +38.2% | +14.6% | −2.4% | +15.7% | +57.0% | +19.8% | −3.6% | −15.9% | +76.6% | −37.0% | +45.1% | +41.8% | +42.4% | +47.6% | +35.9% | −5.5% | −0.7% |
| PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 11 of 24 | +18.4% | +1.9% | −2.8% | +20.1% | +51.4% | −5.2% | +29.7% | −35.0% | +25.5% | +33.1% | −10.8% | +8.0% | +77.2% | +19.4% | −22.3% | +38.2% | +8.6% | −66.5% | +18.8% | +25.5% | +17.3% | +25.6% | +11.3% | +26.6% | — |
| GL Globe Life Inc. | 12 of 25 | +26.5% | −7.5% | +1.8% | +29.7% | −0.5% | −8.9% | +42.3% | −17.2% | +23.9% | +30.3% | +6.3% | +5.0% | +53.2% | +20.5% | +10.2% | +37.6% | −0.5% | −25.2% | −4.3% | +15.6% | −1.9% | +26.6% | +25.9% | −6.2% | +3.2% |
| LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 12 of 25 | +48.0% | +24.8% | −5.5% | −53.5% | +39.5% | −11.1% | +17.9% | −32.0% | +18.0% | +35.0% | −11.5% | +13.1% | +102% | +35.3% | −29.6% | +11.9% | +33.5% | −66.4% | −10.3% | +28.6% | +17.2% | +19.2% | +32.9% | −32.8% | +5.4% |
| CRBG Corebridge Financial, Inc. | 2 of 3 | +3.9% | +42.9% | +25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VOYA Voya Financial, Inc. | 6 of 12 | +11.1% | −3.4% | +20.7% | −6.1% | +14.0% | −2.5% | +52.8% | −18.8% | +26.3% | +6.4% | −12.8% | +20.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 2 of 3 | −0.3% | +39.7% | +45.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 12 of 24 | +0.2% | +19.4% | +10.1% | −3.9% | +45.3% | −11.4% | +20.1% | −26.5% | +13.6% | +32.5% | −7.4% | +0.7% | +77.1% | +9.9% | −12.1% | +20.5% | +66.8% | −66.3% | +9.7% | +18.7% | +34.5% | +33.3% | +33.4% | −3.1% | — |
| BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | 3 of 8 | +34.9% | −9.2% | +3.2% | −1.0% | +43.1% | −7.7% | +28.7% | −48.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FG F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −23.6% | −8.0% | +137% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How SLF has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were SLF's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents SLF's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2000, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of SLF's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after SLF fell 78.8% from October 2007 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until November 2016, eight years later.
Green means SLF fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | SLF fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −78.8% | −54.7% | Oct 2007 | Mar 2009 | 17 months | Nov 2016 | 7.7 years |
| Covid crash | −50.8% | −33.6% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jan 2021 | 10 months |
| Dot-com bust | −42.3% | −38.2% | Dec 2000 | Oct 2002 | 22 months | Oct 2003 | 12 months |
| 2022 bear market | −30.8% | −21.2% | Feb 2022 | Oct 2022 | 8 months | Feb 2024 | 16 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −25.0% | −15.5% | Jan 2018 | Dec 2018 | 11 months | Jul 2019 | 7 months |
How did SLF do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far SLF, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: SLF began trading on March 23, 2000, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- SLF fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when SLF fell 78.8% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, RY held up best, falling less than SLF in seven of the nine crashes they both traded through.
- SLF began trading after the dot-com bust, but eight of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was RY's 21.6%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than SLF.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLF This pageSun Life Financial Inc. | — | −5.5% | −30.8% | −50.2% | −20.3% | −4.5% | −23.8% | −20.3% | −1.4% | −78.8% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 6 of 9 | −6.7% | −29.0% | −41.0% | −20.9% | −5.5% | −18.1% | −19.6% | 0.0% | −63.4% | −44.1% |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 3 of 9 | −6.1% | −27.1% | −55.1% | −25.9% | −2.6% | −35.4% | −35.3% | 0.0% | −83.8% | −42.9% |
| JXN Jackson Financial Inc. | 0 of 2 | −14.2% | −48.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| UNM Unum Group | 2 of 9 | −16.7% | −14.8% | −65.5% | −32.2% | −9.2% | −34.8% | −21.4% | −1.0% | −69.1% | −47.6% |
| EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 4 | −17.7% | −30.6% | −61.3% | −33.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 7 of 9 | −3.8% | −26.0% | −40.0% | −17.1% | −5.7% | −23.1% | −21.8% | 0.0% | −63.1% | −21.6% |
| AFL Aflac Incorporated | 3 of 9 | −6.0% | −19.9% | −51.0% | −13.2% | −6.4% | −15.8% | −31.4% | −4.3% | −82.7% | −36.7% |
| AMP Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −14.9% | −31.5% | −53.9% | −35.3% | −8.9% | −38.2% | −32.3% | −2.6% | −81.1% | — |
| MET MetLife, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −12.6% | −19.5% | −55.0% | −20.9% | −6.9% | −36.5% | −36.3% | −3.4% | −82.3% | — |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 4 of 9 | −7.2% | −40.8% | −42.3% | −25.2% | −7.1% | −19.9% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −60.4% | −33.0% |
| PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −13.3% | −21.1% | −56.3% | −31.5% | −9.0% | −39.9% | −26.8% | −2.4% | −91.5% | — |
| GL Globe Life Inc. | 4 of 9 | −9.8% | −16.6% | −47.7% | −20.5% | −8.7% | −22.7% | −20.9% | −3.3% | −73.7% | −27.4% |
| LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 0 of 9 | −21.0% | −40.4% | −72.0% | −30.6% | −11.1% | −45.9% | −48.5% | −3.0% | −92.4% | −52.1% |
| CRBG Corebridge Financial, Inc. | 0 of 1 | −14.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VOYA Voya Financial, Inc. | 1 of 6 | −11.2% | −23.3% | −52.1% | −28.6% | −8.9% | −43.1% | — | — | — | — |
| BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 0 of 1 | −7.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 1 of 9 | −13.3% | −27.4% | −58.2% | −26.8% | −11.9% | −35.8% | −27.9% | −3.1% | −88.3% | — |
| BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | 0 of 5 | −18.0% | −35.2% | −65.9% | −37.4% | −10.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FG F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. | 0 of 1 | −9.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does SLF move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares SLF with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Only AFL, RY and TD had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than SLF's 1.02, out of 13 popular alternatives with the same record.
- AFL took just 71% of the S&P 500's losses, against 85% for SLF, while still keeping 83% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, SLF captured 87% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 85% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.96. That is a defensive profile: it gave up some of the market's upside in exchange for smaller losses.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than SLF's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLF This pageSun Life Financial Inc. | 87% | 85% | 1.02 | 0.96 |
| AFL Aflac Incorporated | 83% | 71% | 1.17 | 0.79 |
| RY Royal Bank of Canada | 97% | 88% | 1.11 | 0.88 |
| TD The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 89% | 80% | 1.10 | 0.88 |
| MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 110% | 110% | 1.00 | 1.10 |
| GL Globe Life Inc. | 72% | 72% | 1.00 | 0.79 |
| UNM Unum Group | 88% | 90% | 0.98 | 0.96 |
| MET MetLife, Inc. | 91% | 97% | 0.94 | 1.03 |
| AMP Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 141% | 152% | 0.93 | 1.41 |
| VOYA Voya Financial, Inc. | 111% | 128% | 0.87 | 1.17 |
| PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 103% | 124% | 0.83 | 1.22 |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 127% | 157% | 0.81 | 1.30 |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 102% | 146% | 0.70 | 1.25 |
| LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 119% | 211% | 0.56 | 1.67 |
What diversifies SLF?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with SLF's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing SLF with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in SLF into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+13.4% for SLF alone, +15.0% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, HDV and MLPX have moved largely independently of SLF over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in four of the seven calendar years in which SLF lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which SLF lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% SLF and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +74.1% | 0.67 | −12.9% | −16.6% | −10.2% | −34.9% | −57.0% | −18.9% | −17.2% | 21.0% | +13.4% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.37 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | 17.9% | +16.4% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.49 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −3.0% | −0.3% | — | — | — | — | 18.3% | +13.4% |
| MLPX EnergyGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 0.49 | +135% | 0.97 | +21.5% | −15.5% | −35.3% | — | — | — | — | 18.9% | +15.1% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.47 | +323% | 0.97 | −33.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +6.8% | −44.7% | −47.0% | −14.6% | 20.9% | +18.7% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.04 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | — | — | 17.3% | +15.0% |
| FLTW TechnologyFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF | 0.49 | +168% | 0.94 | −27.5% | −9.3% | — | — | — | — | — | 19.9% | +15.8% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.23 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −18.2% | −21.5% | +2.8% | −39.0% | −14.8% | −18.2% | 18.7% | +16.0% |
| AMLP EnergyAlerian MLP ETF | 0.34 | +111% | 0.89 | +25.5% | −12.6% | −25.7% | +10.2% | — | — | — | 18.4% | +14.8% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +74.1% | 0.67 | −12.9% | −16.6% | −10.2% | −34.9% | −57.0% | −18.9% | −17.2% | 21.0% | +13.4% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.38 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −8.3% | −2.5% | 19.4% | +18.5% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.26 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −65.1% | −25.6% | 22.8% | +31.4% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.42 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | −9.4% | +73.7% | 22.1% | +27.2% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.19 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | 18.4% | +18.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.17 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | 19.0% | +20.8% |
Common questions
What was SLF's worst drawdown?
SLF's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 78.8%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were SLF's best and worst years?
Over 25 full calendar years, SLF's best year was 2012, when it returned 52.5%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -57.0%.
Is there a better investment than SLF?
Among SLF's popular alternatives, RY earned more than SLF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 11.7% a year at 19.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, BRK-B (insurance) earned more than SLF with less volatility over the past 5 years: 13.4% a year at 17.1% volatility, against 11.7% a year at 19.4%.
Is SLF more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. SLF's volatility over the past 5 years was 19.4%, 1.1 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, SLF's return lands within 19.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is SLF's Sharpe ratio?
SLF's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.67, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so SLF earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is SLF with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, SLF's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.67 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against SLF instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a SLF holding.
What are the best alternatives to SLF?
Of the 19 popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed SLF in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: TD, MFC and JXN.
Did SLF outperform the S&P 500?
SLF finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 12 of 25 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +9.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did SLF do in stock market crashes?
SLF fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when SLF fell 78.8% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies SLF?
These had a low correlation with SLF over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.37), HDV (correlation 0.49) and MLPX (correlation 0.49); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.38), CLS (correlation 0.26) and FIX (correlation 0.42). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than SLF's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of SLF's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to SLF
TDToronto-Dominion Bank
MFCManulife Financial
RYRoyal Bank of Canada
AFLAflac
AMPAmeriprise Financial
METMetLife
BLKBlackRock
BAMBrookfield Asset Management
PRUPrudential Financial