Relative Intelligence · Asset Management

How Ameriprise Financial (AMP) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on AMP alone. It places AMP (Ameriprise Financial, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where AMP stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: AMP's full trading record, from September 2005 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowOver the past 3 months, AMP fell 7.0% while the S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 3 months, BLK (BlackRock) rose 7.6% and MS (Morgan Stanley) fell 14.0%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?AMP's 7.0% fall over the past 3 months is part of a broader asset management sell-off: the asset management ETF IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF) fell 5.9%, with MS (Morgan Stanley, down 14.0%) and SCHW (Charles Schwab, down 11.1%). Its asset management peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: BLK (BlackRock) rose 7.6%, while MS fell 14.0%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsAMP has trailed the market, rising 4.5% over the past year against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (62.6% against 89.3%). AMP led its asset management peers in 2023, then fell behind MS (Morgan Stanley) and BNY (Bank of New York Mellon) in 2025. By year ↓
- Long termAMP turned $10,000 into $60,700 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. On the flip side, over 5 years AMP trailed the index: 76.8% against 81.7%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross six sell-offs, AMP has typically fallen 1.8 times as far as the S&P 500. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAMP is more of the same, not a cushion: a correlation of 0.67 with the S&P 500 over 5 years and 0.68 with the total US market, more closely than 97% of stocks worth at least $300 million. AMP fell in 19 of the 22 months the S&P 500 fell over the past 5 years: it usually fell with it. By year ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- FHI (Federated Hermes) and BNY (Bank of New York Mellon) earned more than AMP with less volatility over the past 5 years. FHI returned 15.1% a year at 24.6% volatility, against 12.1% a year at 27.8%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- RY (Royal Bank of Canada, banks) and JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co., banks) earned more than AMP with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 12.1% a year at 27.8%.
- Versus the S&P 500
- The S&P 500 matched AMP's return over the past 5 years (12.7% a year against 12.1%) with 38% less volatility.
How much would $10,000 in AMP have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in AMP over the past 21 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of AMP over the same span and AMP's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: AMP began trading on September 15, 2005, so the chart cannot reach back to the dot-com bust. It covers the most recent 21 years of AMP's record, starting at the end of September 2005.
- $10,000 invested in AMP at the end of September 2005 would have grown to $207,389 by September 2026, more than the $90,973 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of AMP, and AAPL finished highest, at $2,081,301.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2005 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 154 of the 1,562 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AMP; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- AAPL$2M+20,713% total · +28.9% a year
- GWW$278,698+2,687% total · +17.2% a year
- CTAS$251,996+2,420% total · +16.6% a year
- IVZ$212,386+2,024% total · +15.7% a year
- MCK$210,354+2,004% total · +15.6% a year
- AMP$207,389+1,974% total · +15.5% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$90,973+810% total · +11.1% a year
- SEIC$69,648+596% total · +9.7% a year
- AMG$52,156+422% total · +8.2% a year
- FHI$43,593+336% total · +7.3% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 779 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of AMP; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- VCTR$36,954+270% total · +29.9% a year
- BNY$31,954+220% total · +26.2% a year
- AMG$24,224+142% total · +19.4% a year
- MS$22,663+127% total · +17.8% a year
- FHI$20,892+109% total · +15.9% a year
- AMP$20,051+101% total · +14.9% a year
- LPLA$19,958+99.6% total · +14.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- SLF$18,746+87.5% total · +13.4% a year
- SEIC$18,496+85.0% total · +13.1% a year
AMP at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
Note: AMP began trading on September 15, 2005, so every figure here, including its worst decline, covers only the time since then. None of them reflect the dot-com bust.
- AMP's deepest decline since it began trading in 2005 was 81.1%, from October 2007 to November 2008. It took 27 months from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 20 full calendar years, AMP's best was 2013, when it returned 88.4%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 56.9%. It lost money in five of those years.
- AMP is 14.5% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $43B
- Industry
- Asset Management
- Price history from
- September 2005
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +4.5%total return
- Past 3 years
- +62.6%+17.6% a year
- Past 5 years
- +76.8%+12.1% a year
- Past 10 years
- +507%+19.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +88.4%2013
- Worst calendar year
- −56.9%2008
- Losing years
- 5 of 20full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 27.8%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.55return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −81.1%Oct 2007 to Nov 2008
- From its all-time high
- −14.5%below the peak
AMP against the whole market
Where AMP ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does AMP rank among all stocks?
This section ranks AMP on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how AMP stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- AMP's 10-year return ranks in the top 14% of the 2,202 stocks worth at least $300 million with 10 years of history.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | AMP | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +4.5% | 1,784 of 3,287 | bottom 47% |
| 3-year return | +62.6% | 1,363 of 3,017 | top 45% |
| 5-year return | +76.8% | 841 of 2,893 | top 29% |
| 10-year return | +507% | 302 of 2,202 | top 14% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 27.8% | 536 of 2,893 | top 19% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.55 | 810 of 2,893 | top 28% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −53.9% | 609 of 2,187 | top 28% |
What has beaten AMP on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). AMP sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than AMP with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 95 stocks and 121 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than AMP over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 6% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half AMP's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 11% less than AMP's 27.8%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.55 for AMP.
- Among AMP's popular alternatives, BNY and FHI are in the region. BNY earned 22.7% a year against 12.1% a year for AMP, at 24.4% volatility, 12% less than AMP's 27.8%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to AMP; faint dots are 90 more of the 216 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
Is there a better investment than AMP?
Investments that beat AMP over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among AMP's popular alternatives, FHI and BNY earned more than AMP with less volatility over the past 5 years. FHI returned 15.1% a year at 24.6% volatility, against 12.1% a year at 27.8%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RY (banks) and JPM (banks) earned more than AMP with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 12.1% a year at 27.8%.
- The S&P 500 matched AMP's return over the past 5 years (12.7% a year against 12.1%) with 38% less volatility.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat AMP over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks AMP's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than AMP follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than AMP's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× AMP's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than AMP's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with AMP?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +12.1% | 27.8% | 0.55 | −53.9% | +507% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.67 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 6 shownThe investments people most often weigh against AMP. 8 of 23 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
FHIFederated Hermes, Inc. · Asset Management | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +15.1% | 24.6% | 0.70 | −64.9% | +214% | 0.51 | — | |
VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | 0.68 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatility | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.75 | — | ||
AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc. · Asset Management | Higher return in most periods | +18.8% | 31.9% | 0.70 | −78.5% | +185% | 0.60 | — | |
| Higher return, similar volatility | +16.0% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | +627% | 0.69 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatility | +11.2% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | +319% | 0.27 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Asset Management and the categories next to it (Banks, Investment Banking & Brokerage, Alternative Asset Management, Capital Markets), plus AMP's specific themes. 36 of 113 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.78 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.48 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +33.7% | 29.4% | 1.14 | −47.6% | +474% | 0.36 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.9% | 19.9% | 0.71 | −46.9% | +187% | 0.59 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.6% | 28.6% | 0.77 | −48.8% | +521% | 0.71 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 667 of 3,497 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.37 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.11 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.24 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.34 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.61 | — | ||
DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.26 | 0.48% | |
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +12.8% | 16.9% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +324% | 0.67 | 0.03% | ||
What these numbers mean for AMP
- Annual return
- AMP returned 12.1% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $17,700. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- AMP's volatility over the past 5 years was 27.8%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AMP's return lands within 27.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- AMP's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.55, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AMP earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- AMP's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 53.9%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 53.9% fall takes a 117% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, AMP's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.67 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AMP instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AMP holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 216 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than AMP with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with AMP | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.37 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.11 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +38.7% | 25.0% | 1.44 | −38.1% | +586% | 0.24 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +21.3% | 25.6% | 0.89 | −30.3% | +816% | 0.34 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +26.3% | 24.9% | 1.07 | −41.6% | +654% | 0.61 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.62 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +15.8% | 24.6% | 0.72 | −30.7% | +576% | 0.41 | — | |
| 8 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.25 | — | |
| 9 | Same or nearby category | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.58 | — | |
| 10 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.26 | 0.48% |
| 11 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.53 | 0.40% |
| 12 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.22 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.47 | — | |
| 14 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.44 | 0.18% | |
| 15 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.36 | — | |
| 16 | Whole market | +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 0.28 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.19 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.23 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +22.8% | 24.9% | 0.95 | −30.5% | +200% | 0.22 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +18.4% | 26.0% | 0.78 | −35.1% | +779% | 0.42 | 0.09% | |
| 21 | Whole market | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.49 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.58 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.43 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +17.2% | 24.9% | 0.77 | −30.4% | +285% | 0.18 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.28 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.24 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.27 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | 0.33 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.54 | 0.04% | |
| 30 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.58 | — | |
| 31 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.65 | 0.26% | |
| 32 | Whole market | +17.9% | 25.4% | 0.78 | −42.5% | +284% | 0.41 | — | |
| 33 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.22 | 0.80% |
| 34 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +157% | 0.59 | 0.31% |
| 35 | FNDXSchwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.9% | 0.93 | −37.7% | +291% | 0.76 | 0.25% |
| 36 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.33 | — |
| 37 | Same or nearby category | +17.3% | 24.3% | 0.78 | −43.6% | +537% | 0.78 | — | |
| 38 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.54 | 0.25% |
| 39 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.47 | 0.13% |
| 40 | LLoews Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.3% | 19.2% | 0.80 | −48.5% | +180% | 0.55 | — |
| 41 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.50 | 0.36% |
| 42 | PKGPackaging Corporation of America · Packaging | Whole market | +15.4% | 25.8% | 0.69 | −38.2% | +294% | 0.53 | — |
| 43 | Same or nearby category | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.48 | — | |
| 44 | PAVEGlobal X - U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF · Infrastructure Equity | Whole market | +14.9% | 21.6% | 0.75 | −44.1% | — | 0.67 | 0.47% |
| 45 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +253% | 0.75 | 0.15% |
| 46 | Same or nearby category | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.58 | — | |
| 47 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.58 | 0.35% |
| 48 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.59 | 0.40% |
| 49 | MGCVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.4% | 0.81 | −33.1% | +353% | 0.63 | 0.05% |
| 50 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.67 | 0.43% |
| 51 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.66 | 0.12% |
| 52 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.54 | 0.15% |
| 53 | MSGSMadison Square Garden Sports Corp. · Entertainment | Whole market | +18.4% | 25.6% | 0.79 | −41.6% | +432% | 0.31 | — |
| 54 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.51 | — |
| 55 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.37 | — |
| 56 | CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Same or nearby category | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.25 | — |
| 57 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.62 | 0.95% |
| 58 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.22 | 0.19% |
| 59 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.60 | 0.12% |
| 60 | RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.9% | 25.1% | 0.75 | −33.7% | +572% | 0.46 | 0.40% |
| 61 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.53 | 0.60% |
| 62 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.46 | 0.50% |
| 63 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.59 | — | |
| 64 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.63 | 0.25% |
| 65 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.5% | 22.5% | 0.83 | −31.4% | — | 0.52 | 0.15% |
| 66 | FRDMFreedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF · International | Whole market | +17.3% | 22.8% | 0.82 | −40.5% | — | 0.31 | 0.49% |
| 67 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.52 | 0.45% |
| 68 | WTVWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.0% | 0.83 | −42.2% | +303% | 0.82 | 0.12% |
| 69 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.52 | 0.09% |
| 70 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.78 | 0.05% |
| 71 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.46 | — | |
| 72 | PWVInvesco Large Cap Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.2% | 0.97 | −37.6% | +223% | 0.79 | 0.55% |
| 73 | CHCOCity Holding Company · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 22.8% | 0.77 | −32.3% | +286% | 0.62 | — |
| 74 | FFLCFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +15.7% | 16.8% | 0.95 | −19.7% | — | 0.73 | 0.38% |
| 75 | AUSFGlobal X - Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF · International | Whole market | +13.2% | 13.6% | 0.99 | −44.2% | — | 0.73 | 0.27% |
| 76 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.6% | 0.85 | −41.3% | — | 0.80 | 0.18% |
| 77 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.27 | 0.45% |
| 78 | CTBICommunity Trust Bancorp, Inc. · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +16.0% | 26.0% | 0.70 | −43.0% | +192% | 0.61 | — |
| 79 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.52 | 0.50% |
| 80 | EWJViShares MSCI Japan Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.2% | 0.86 | −30.1% | — | 0.38 | 0.15% |
| 81 | DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF · International | Whole market | +13.8% | 15.1% | 0.94 | −34.4% | +261% | 0.67 | 0.50% |
| 82 | FYLDCambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.0% | 0.85 | −44.6% | +203% | 0.57 | 0.59% |
| 83 | THFFFirst Financial Corporation · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 26.2% | 0.69 | −42.8% | +161% | 0.46 | — |
| 84 | UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund · Energy | Whole market | +18.7% | 19.2% | 0.99 | −48.1% | — | 0.67 | 0.85% |
| 85 | IDOGALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 15.6% | 0.93 | −37.3% | +180% | 0.50 | 0.50% |
| 86 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.31 | 0.70% |
| 87 | GVALCambria Global Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.4% | 18.7% | 0.82 | −46.8% | +173% | 0.51 | 0.68% |
| 88 | Whole market | +21.0% | 24.8% | 0.90 | −67.2% | +233% | 0.33 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.30 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.34 | — | |
| 91 | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.47 | — | |
| 92 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 0.23 | — | |
| 93 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.35 | — | |
| 94 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.53 | — | |
| 95 | Whole market | +23.0% | 25.6% | 0.94 | −61.4% | +278% | 0.41 | — | |
| 96 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.54 | — | |
| 97 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.67 | — | |
| 98 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.57 | — | |
| 99 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.57 | — | |
| 100 | Whole market | +25.6% | 26.2% | 1.00 | −64.1% | +264% | 0.64 | — |
AMP against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against AMP, compared period by period and year by year.
How do AMP's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at AMP, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- BNY, FHI and SEIC were both more rewarding and calmer than AMP over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, AMP returned 12.1% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (27.8% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than AMP with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| VCTR Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. | +28.1% | 35.0% |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | +22.7% | 24.4% |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | +18.8% | 31.9% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | +16.0% | 28.8% |
| FHI Federated Hermes, Inc. | +15.1% | 24.6% |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | +13.6% | 36.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| SEIC SEI Investments Company | +12.7% | 22.3% |
| AMP This pageAmeriprise Financial, Inc. | +12.1% | 27.8% |
| MET MetLife, Inc. | +12.0% | 25.4% |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | +11.7% | 19.4% |
| CME CME Group Inc. | +11.2% | 20.8% |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | +10.4% | 27.9% |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | +8.9% | 29.3% |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | +8.4% | 31.0% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | +7.1% | 27.1% |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | +6.9% | 36.4% |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | +5.6% | 31.7% |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | +5.4% | 36.5% |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | +5.2% | 25.5% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | +3.6% | 31.9% |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | +0.9% | 31.1% |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | +0.7% | 25.6% |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 0.0% | 27.6% |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | −8.9% | 30.5% |
Has AMP consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares AMP with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than AMP helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Five of the 23 popular alternatives, led by AMG, SEIC and VCTR, outperformed AMP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- BNY, VCTR and SLF earned more for the risk they took than AMP (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than AMP over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| AMP Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (this page) | — | −9.0% | −7.0% | +7.5% | −0.3% | +4.5% | +62.6% | +76.8% | +507% | 27.8% | 0.55 | −53.9% | — | $43B | — |
| AMG QualifiedAffiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +6.6% | +6.2% | +29.2% | +34.6% | +59.9% | +214% | +137% | +185% | 31.9% | 0.70 | −78.5% | — | $10B | — |
| SEIC QualifiedSEI Investments Company | 5/5 short2/3 long | +1.7% | +7.8% | +32.4% | +29.8% | +32.7% | +102% | +81.6% | +168% | 22.3% | 0.65 | −51.8% | — | $13B | — |
| VCTR QualifiedVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. | 5/5 short2/3 long | +0.6% | +10.9% | +47.0% | +72.1% | +69.8% | +305% | +245% | — | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | $6.7B | — |
| FHI QualifiedFederated Hermes, Inc. | 4/5 short2/3 long | −3.8% | −3.1% | −0.6% | +9.0% | +11.1% | +101% | +102% | +214% | 24.6% | 0.70 | −64.9% | — | $4.2B | — |
| BNY QualifiedBank of New York Mellon Corp | 3/5 short2/3 long | −6.3% | −7.7% | +7.4% | +24.8% | +35.3% | +272% | +179% | +341% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | — | $98B | — |
| MS Financial - Capital MarketsMorgan Stanley | 2/5 short3/3 long | −12.5% | −14.0% | −4.4% | +0.8% | +13.9% | +170% | +110% | +627% | 28.8% | 0.66 | −51.3% | — | $285B | — |
| LPLA Financial - Capital MarketsLPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −3.1% | −1.8% | −0.3% | −10.7% | −4.9% | +47.1% | +88.9% | +1,057% | 36.2% | 0.54 | −60.3% | — | $25B | — |
| SLF Insurance - DiversifiedSun Life Financial Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | −2.2% | −0.4% | +15.2% | +30.4% | +35.5% | +96.3% | +74.1% | +255% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | — | $44B | — |
| MET Insurance - LifeMetLife, Inc. | 5/5 short1/3 long | +4.7% | +9.5% | +32.0% | +28.6% | +32.2% | +84.0% | +76.5% | +240% | 25.4% | 0.58 | −55.2% | — | $64B | — |
| IVZ Asset ManagementInvesco Ltd. | 5/5 short1/3 long | −8.3% | −2.3% | +17.0% | +9.3% | +30.0% | +158% | +39.8% | +50.9% | 36.4% | 0.37 | −79.8% | — | $13B | — |
| BLK Asset ManagementBlackRock, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +3.5% | +7.6% | +8.8% | +5.7% | −0.6% | +96.3% | +41.1% | +313% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | — | $175B | — |
| NTRS Asset ManagementNorthern Trust Corporation | 3/5 short1/3 long | −7.5% | −9.1% | +5.0% | +20.6% | +31.1% | +180% | +52.9% | +205% | 29.3% | 0.44 | −50.0% | — | $30B | — |
| RJF Asset ManagementRaymond James Financial, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −5.7% | −7.4% | +2.7% | −4.1% | −4.5% | +69.5% | +64.2% | +358% | 27.9% | 0.50 | −45.6% | — | $30B | — |
| SF Financial - Capital MarketsStifel Financial Corp | 0/5 short1/3 long | −11.7% | −13.4% | −17.4% | −20.8% | −9.0% | +86.5% | +49.5% | +374% | 31.0% | 0.41 | −51.8% | — | $10B | — |
| SCHW Financial - Capital MarketsThe Charles Schwab Corporation | 0/5 short1/3 long | −15.0% | −11.1% | −1.8% | −9.6% | −3.1% | +86.2% | +19.1% | +221% | 31.9% | 0.27 | −51.1% | — | $157B | — |
| PRU Insurance - LifePrudential Financial, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | −2.8% | −1.2% | +15.2% | +5.2% | +19.6% | +47.5% | +29.0% | +117% | 25.5% | 0.33 | −65.9% | — | $40B | — |
| BEN Asset ManagementFranklin Resources, Inc. | 5/5 short0/3 long | −6.2% | −2.1% | +14.9% | +35.9% | +44.8% | +62.4% | +31.5% | +49.2% | 31.7% | 0.33 | −62.1% | — | $16B | — |
| CME Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesCME Group Inc. | 4/5 short0/3 long | +7.2% | +21.0% | +3.8% | +13.2% | +14.6% | +57.7% | +70.1% | +319% | 20.8% | 0.62 | −37.4% | — | $106B | — |
| SPGI Financial - Data & Stock ExchangesS&P Global Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +8.3% | −2.1% | −0.6% | −13.9% | −7.4% | +28.2% | +3.7% | +293% | 25.6% | 0.16 | −39.8% | — | $129B | — |
| AB Asset ManagementAllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −4.1% | −6.1% | −6.3% | −3.5% | −3.7% | +56.6% | −0.1% | +281% | 27.6% | 0.14 | −58.1% | — | $3.2B | — |
| TROW Asset ManagementT. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | −2.4% | −11.2% | +6.7% | +1.5% | +3.1% | +22.7% | −37.4% | +126% | 30.5% | -0.16 | −58.2% | — | $22B | — |
| JEF Financial - Capital MarketsJefferies Financial Group Inc. | 1/5 short0/3 long | −5.9% | −17.8% | −3.9% | −27.5% | −14.2% | +51.7% | +30.3% | +249% | 36.5% | 0.33 | −54.4% | — | $8.5B | — |
| APAM Asset ManagementArtisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −10.4% | −12.7% | −8.8% | −14.1% | −16.8% | +26.9% | +4.6% | +200% | 31.1% | 0.18 | −51.1% | — | $2.3B | — |
How did AMP do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2006, along with where AMP ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with AMP and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
Note: AMP began trading on September 15, 2005, so the table starts with 2006, its first full calendar year, and cannot show how it fared during the dot-com bust.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, AMP finished in the top quarter in ten of 20 years and in the bottom quarter in four. In 2025, it ranked 23 of 24.
- AMP finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 12 of its 20 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, VCTR came out ahead of AMP most often, in four of the seven years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of AMP; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places AMP among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of AMP | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP This pageAmeriprise Financial, Inc. | — | −6.7% | +42.1% | +24.0% | +5.0% | +57.9% | +19.8% | +64.0% | −36.8% | +56.4% | +7.7% | −17.8% | +17.2% | +88.4% | +29.5% | −12.3% | +50.7% | +70.6% | −56.9% | +2.1% | +34.3% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 10 of 20 | 23 of 24 | 6 of 24 | 6 of 24 | 4 of 24 | 5 of 24 | 9 of 24 | 3 of 24 | 20 of 23 | 3 of 23 | 16 of 23 | 19 of 23 | 6 of 23 | 1 of 22 | 12 of 22 | 8 of 22 | 1 of 21 | 4 of 21 | 13 of 21 | 18 of 21 | 7 of 21 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8 of 20 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 6 of 20 | +55.9% | +22.2% | −4.4% | −3.7% | +61.8% | +20.5% | −11.8% | −52.1% | +41.9% | −9.0% | −24.7% | −2.1% | +66.6% | +35.6% | −3.3% | +47.3% | +60.7% | −64.3% | +11.7% | +31.0% |
| SEIC SEI Investments Company | 7 of 20 | +0.6% | +31.5% | +10.6% | −2.9% | +7.4% | −11.1% | +43.4% | −34.9% | +46.2% | −4.8% | +32.1% | +16.8% | +50.8% | +38.5% | −26.0% | +37.0% | +13.2% | −50.9% | +8.3% | +61.7% |
| VCTR Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. | 4 of 7 | −0.8% | +95.9% | +33.5% | −23.9% | +49.7% | +19.7% | +106% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FHI Federated Hermes, Inc. | 6 of 20 | +30.5% | +29.6% | −3.8% | −0.1% | +34.6% | −3.8% | +27.0% | −23.4% | +30.9% | +6.5% | −10.3% | +18.4% | +48.0% | +50.2% | −39.6% | +4.0% | +69.0% | −57.6% | +24.6% | −6.9% |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | 9 of 20 | +54.4% | +51.9% | +18.5% | −19.1% | +40.6% | −12.9% | +9.6% | −10.8% | +15.7% | +17.1% | +3.3% | +18.3% | +38.6% | +32.1% | −32.8% | +9.3% | +0.9% | −40.4% | +20.0% | +26.8% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 8 of 20 | +45.2% | +39.7% | +13.9% | −10.3% | +46.6% | +38.1% | +32.7% | −22.8% | +26.6% | +36.1% | −16.7% | +25.0% | +65.4% | +27.6% | −43.9% | −7.5% | +88.3% | −68.8% | −22.1% | +46.3% |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 6 of 15 | +9.8% | +44.1% | +5.9% | +35.7% | +54.6% | +14.6% | +52.9% | +8.5% | +66.0% | −14.1% | −2.0% | −3.4% | +70.1% | −1.3% | −16.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 6 of 20 | +9.7% | +19.5% | +16.9% | −12.9% | +29.7% | +2.0% | +42.7% | −16.6% | +10.3% | +27.6% | −10.2% | +5.9% | +39.3% | +52.5% | −34.9% | +10.2% | +31.1% | −57.0% | +35.5% | +8.2% |
| MET MetLife, Inc. | 7 of 20 | −0.8% | +27.7% | −5.5% | +19.2% | +37.5% | −3.4% | +28.8% | −15.8% | +8.4% | +15.9% | −8.3% | +3.0% | +67.5% | +7.9% | −28.3% | +27.9% | +3.7% | −42.2% | +5.6% | +21.7% |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | 6 of 20 | +56.9% | +3.0% | +4.2% | −18.7% | +35.5% | +3.0% | +14.9% | −52.0% | +24.6% | −5.9% | −12.1% | +11.5% | +43.4% | +33.4% | −14.6% | +4.8% | +66.6% | −52.6% | +442% | +72.6% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 10 of 20 | +6.6% | +29.3% | +17.9% | −20.4% | +29.4% | +47.2% | +31.9% | −21.6% | +38.2% | +14.6% | −2.4% | +15.7% | +57.0% | +19.8% | −3.6% | −15.9% | +76.6% | −37.0% | +45.1% | +41.8% |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 6 of 20 | +36.9% | +25.6% | −1.0% | −23.8% | +31.6% | −9.3% | +30.6% | −14.7% | +14.2% | +26.1% | +9.1% | +11.1% | +26.1% | +29.9% | −26.5% | +8.1% | +2.7% | −30.8% | +28.2% | +19.1% |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 8 of 20 | +4.7% | +40.8% | +6.1% | +8.3% | +59.5% | +8.7% | +22.8% | −15.7% | +30.0% | +21.3% | +2.5% | +11.1% | +37.2% | +26.3% | −3.7% | +39.8% | +41.8% | −46.4% | +8.7% | +22.1% |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | 8 of 20 | +20.9% | +57.2% | +22.7% | −14.8% | +41.4% | +27.1% | +48.8% | −29.5% | +20.0% | +17.9% | −16.9% | +6.4% | +49.9% | −0.3% | −22.5% | +4.8% | +29.1% | +30.7% | +34.2% | +4.2% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 7 of 20 | +36.6% | +9.2% | −16.0% | +0.1% | +60.2% | +13.6% | +16.4% | −18.4% | +31.1% | +21.0% | +9.9% | +17.2% | +83.3% | +29.8% | −33.1% | −7.8% | +18.1% | −36.1% | +40.0% | +32.8% |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 5 of 20 | +0.2% | +19.4% | +10.1% | −3.9% | +45.3% | −11.4% | +20.1% | −26.5% | +13.6% | +32.5% | −7.4% | +0.7% | +77.1% | +9.9% | −12.1% | +20.5% | +66.8% | −66.3% | +9.7% | +18.7% |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 7 of 20 | +24.8% | −27.2% | +16.9% | −17.5% | +39.0% | +1.4% | −9.2% | −23.4% | +11.6% | +9.8% | −32.5% | −2.3% | +38.9% | +35.2% | −10.9% | +6.5% | +71.8% | −43.7% | +4.4% | +17.8% |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 8 of 20 | +19.8% | +15.4% | +31.3% | −22.9% | +29.5% | −6.3% | +9.7% | +32.1% | +32.4% | +33.9% | +4.4% | +18.3% | +64.0% | +11.4% | −22.7% | −2.7% | +64.3% | −68.8% | +35.3% | +39.5% |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 9 of 20 | +5.7% | +13.9% | +32.8% | −28.4% | +44.7% | +21.4% | +62.3% | +1.4% | +59.3% | +10.5% | +12.3% | +15.5% | +45.9% | +30.1% | +26.6% | +12.0% | +49.3% | −45.5% | −34.7% | +33.5% |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 7 of 20 | +13.4% | +30.4% | −2.3% | −23.4% | +56.3% | +23.0% | +19.9% | +21.0% | +16.9% | +7.0% | −1.1% | +30.3% | +31.2% | +42.6% | −39.4% | −12.2% | +44.2% | −70.1% | −1.2% | +50.2% |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 8 of 20 | −4.7% | +9.7% | +3.4% | −42.2% | +34.9% | +28.1% | +35.6% | −9.8% | +43.4% | +8.5% | −12.2% | +4.7% | +31.3% | +18.1% | −9.8% | +23.8% | +54.2% | −40.6% | +41.1% | +23.0% |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | 6 of 20 | −18.8% | +98.9% | +27.8% | −8.5% | +61.9% | +18.9% | +35.1% | −33.2% | +15.5% | +35.5% | −21.5% | −20.1% | +23.5% | +5.8% | −21.2% | +23.8% | +20.1% | −58.0% | +67.9% | +19.9% |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 4 of 12 | +2.8% | +4.9% | +60.3% | −31.3% | +2.8% | +71.0% | +67.1% | −38.2% | +45.2% | −10.1% | −23.1% | −17.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How AMP has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were AMP's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents AMP's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2005, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
Note: AMP began trading on September 15, 2005, so this list cannot include the dot-com bust. The crash tests on this page show how older funds and the S&P 500 fared through those years.
- In all five of AMP's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- The slowest recovery came after AMP fell 81.1% from October 2007 to November 2008; it did not regain that peak until February 2011, two years later.
Green means AMP fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | AMP fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −81.1% | −48.1% | Oct 2007 | Nov 2008 | 13 months | Feb 2011 | 2.3 years |
| Covid crash | −53.9% | −33.4% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Nov 2020 | 8 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −45.0% | −14.1% | Jan 2018 | Dec 2018 | 11 months | Feb 2020 | 14 months |
| 2015 China and oil sell-off | −43.3% | −11.0% | Feb 2015 | Feb 2016 | 12 months | Feb 2017 | 12 months |
| 2011 euro debt crisis | −41.9% | −17.1% | Feb 2011 | Oct 2011 | 8 months | Dec 2012 | 14 months |
How did AMP do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far AMP, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: AMP began trading on September 15, 2005, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- AMP fell further than the S&P 500 in all nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when AMP fell 81.1% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, SLF held up best, falling less than AMP in all nine crashes they both traded through.
- AMP began trading after the dot-com bust, but 16 of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was JEF's 28.6%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than AMP.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP This pageAmeriprise Financial, Inc. | — | −14.9% | −31.5% | −53.9% | −35.3% | −8.9% | −38.2% | −32.3% | −2.6% | −81.1% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −12.8% | −32.9% | −49.1% | −38.7% | −9.0% | −44.4% | −31.8% | −4.8% | −85.9% | −46.4% |
| SEIC SEI Investments Company | 7 of 9 | −6.9% | −24.7% | −47.2% | −31.1% | −7.3% | −38.4% | −31.1% | −2.8% | −71.2% | −69.0% |
| VCTR Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. | 3 of 4 | −9.7% | −36.2% | −43.8% | −28.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FHI Federated Hermes, Inc. | 8 of 9 | −3.5% | −26.9% | −64.3% | −11.9% | −7.0% | −30.9% | −25.7% | −0.1% | −62.6% | −32.8% |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | 8 of 9 | −11.4% | −40.5% | −40.1% | −16.2% | −5.4% | −27.0% | −30.9% | −0.5% | −62.4% | −62.6% |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 5 of 9 | −8.2% | −32.4% | −50.6% | −24.6% | −6.7% | −43.9% | −47.7% | 0.0% | −86.2% | −72.0% |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 4 of 7 | −19.8% | −24.7% | −60.3% | −19.8% | −4.5% | −46.0% | −28.1% | — | — | — |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 9 of 9 | −5.5% | −30.8% | −50.2% | −20.3% | −4.5% | −23.8% | −20.3% | −1.4% | −78.8% | — |
| MET MetLife, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −12.6% | −19.5% | −55.0% | −20.9% | −6.9% | −36.5% | −36.3% | −3.4% | −82.3% | — |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | 3 of 9 | −7.5% | −43.4% | −57.8% | −34.4% | −9.2% | −33.1% | −35.1% | −3.6% | −85.0% | −82.0% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 8 of 9 | −7.2% | −40.8% | −42.3% | −25.2% | −7.1% | −19.9% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −60.4% | −33.0% |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 8 of 9 | −10.7% | −36.0% | −39.0% | −27.2% | −8.1% | −29.9% | −25.4% | 0.0% | −60.5% | −65.2% |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 7 of 9 | −16.2% | −25.8% | −45.6% | −26.5% | −8.8% | −31.6% | −29.3% | −0.3% | −69.7% | −40.7% |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | 4 of 9 | −17.1% | −34.9% | −51.8% | −28.7% | −8.3% | −47.4% | −39.6% | −4.2% | −41.5% | −31.3% |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 6 of 9 | −31.9% | −36.9% | −41.5% | −26.5% | −8.2% | −37.0% | −28.9% | −5.5% | −56.0% | −83.1% |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 5 of 9 | −13.3% | −27.4% | −58.2% | −26.8% | −11.9% | −35.8% | −27.9% | −3.1% | −88.3% | — |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −5.5% | −39.2% | −40.4% | −19.0% | −7.1% | −29.3% | −32.1% | −2.5% | −72.5% | −40.3% |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 8 of 9 | −3.4% | −31.7% | −37.4% | −9.4% | −4.3% | −17.3% | −18.0% | −1.9% | −77.5% | — |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 8 of 9 | −4.2% | −36.3% | −38.1% | −24.6% | −6.2% | −21.3% | −20.8% | −0.4% | −66.4% | −29.5% |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 5 of 9 | −4.1% | −32.5% | −58.1% | −23.3% | −7.5% | −40.9% | −28.1% | 0.0% | −87.5% | −54.7% |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 8 of 9 | −6.8% | −48.2% | −38.0% | −23.4% | −7.2% | −15.0% | −23.4% | −1.7% | −67.4% | −54.1% |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | 3 of 9 | −15.2% | −35.3% | −48.3% | −29.9% | −9.3% | −37.0% | −39.3% | −3.3% | −80.7% | −28.6% |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 2 of 6 | −6.8% | −39.4% | −49.7% | −38.0% | −10.1% | −46.5% | — | — | — | — |
How closely does AMP move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares AMP with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- BNY took just 120% of the S&P 500's losses, against 152% for AMP, while still keeping 115% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, AMP captured 141% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 152% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.41. It amplified the market's moves in both directions.
- Nine of the 22 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than AMP's 0.93, led by CME, LPLA and RJF.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than AMP's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP This pageAmeriprise Financial, Inc. | 141% | 152% | 0.93 | 1.41 |
| CME CME Group Inc. | 50% | 11% | 4.48 | 0.33 |
| LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 110% | 52% | 2.13 | 0.85 |
| RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 103% | 97% | 1.06 | 1.07 |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 142% | 137% | 1.04 | 1.39 |
| SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 87% | 85% | 1.02 | 0.96 |
| SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 89% | 90% | 0.99 | 0.91 |
| BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp | 115% | 120% | 0.96 | 1.08 |
| SF Stifel Financial Corp | 120% | 125% | 0.96 | 1.25 |
| MET MetLife, Inc. | 91% | 97% | 0.94 | 1.03 |
| FHI Federated Hermes, Inc. | 85% | 93% | 0.91 | 0.90 |
| AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 102% | 112% | 0.91 | 1.10 |
| SPGI S&P Global Inc. | 107% | 125% | 0.85 | 1.04 |
| NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 111% | 136% | 0.82 | 1.18 |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 127% | 157% | 0.81 | 1.30 |
| AMG Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | 103% | 137% | 0.76 | 1.22 |
| SEIC SEI Investments Company | 97% | 127% | 0.76 | 1.03 |
| JEF Jefferies Financial Group Inc. | 147% | 197% | 0.75 | 1.52 |
| APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. | 160% | 224% | 0.72 | 1.79 |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 102% | 146% | 0.70 | 1.25 |
| TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | 118% | 172% | 0.68 | 1.35 |
| BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 102% | 170% | 0.60 | 1.39 |
| IVZ Invesco Ltd. | 119% | 201% | 0.59 | 1.46 |
What diversifies AMP?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with AMP's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing AMP with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in AMP into DBMF would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 22% over the past 5 years while keeping its annual return (+14.9% for AMP alone, +14.9% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, DXJ, SMH and GLD have moved largely independently of AMP over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.31 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- GLD made money in three of the five calendar years in which AMP lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which AMP lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% AMP and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +76.8% | 0.55 | −6.7% | −36.8% | −17.8% | −12.3% | −56.9% | 27.1% | +14.9% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.26 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | 22.5% | +17.9% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.31 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +6.8% | −44.7% | 24.8% | +20.3% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.00 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | 22.0% | +16.5% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.47 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | −0.9% | — | — | — | 23.9% | +16.8% |
| EWT TechnologyiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 0.24 | +153% | 0.89 | +28.4% | −9.9% | −12.9% | −21.8% | −45.3% | 23.4% | +17.2% |
| EDIV InternationalState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 0.35 | +69.9% | 0.84 | +16.4% | −6.2% | −27.4% | — | — | 22.8% | +14.7% |
| PTLC Broad MarketPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 0.42 | +57.4% | 0.83 | +5.1% | +1.5% | — | — | — | 22.7% | +14.5% |
| DBMF AlternativesiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | -0.25 | +59.7% | 0.82 | +13.8% | — | — | — | — | 21.2% | +14.9% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +76.8% | 0.55 | −6.7% | −36.8% | −17.8% | −12.3% | −56.9% | 27.1% | +14.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.25 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | 23.6% | +20.2% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.32 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | 27.8% | +32.7% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.35 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | 26.2% | +28.8% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.24 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | 23.4% | +19.6% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.34 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | 24.7% | +22.1% |
Common questions
What was AMP's worst drawdown?
AMP's deepest decline since it began trading in 2005 was 81.1%, from October 2007 to November 2008. It took 27 months from the low to climb back to its old high. Because AMP launched in September 2005, that record does not include the dot-com bust.
What were AMP's best and worst years?
Over 20 full calendar years, AMP's best year was 2013, when it returned 88.4%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -56.9%.
Is there a better investment than AMP?
Among AMP's popular alternatives, FHI and BNY earned more than AMP with less volatility over the past 5 years. FHI returned 15.1% a year at 24.6% volatility, against 12.1% a year at 27.8%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, RY (banks) and JPM (banks) earned more than AMP with less volatility over the past 5 years. RY returned 17.3% a year at 18.2% volatility, against 12.1% a year at 27.8%.
Is AMP more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. AMP's volatility over the past 5 years was 27.8%, 1.6 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, AMP's return lands within 27.8% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is AMP's Sharpe ratio?
AMP's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.55, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so AMP earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is AMP with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, AMP's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.67 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against AMP instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a AMP holding.
What are the best alternatives to AMP?
Of the 23 popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed AMP in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: AMG, SEIC and VCTR.
Did AMP outperform the S&P 500?
AMP finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 12 of 20 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -6.7%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did AMP do in stock market crashes?
AMP fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in none of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in nine. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when AMP fell 81.1% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies AMP?
These had a low correlation with AMP over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, DXJ (correlation 0.26), SMH (correlation 0.31) and GLD (correlation 0.00); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.25), CLS (correlation 0.32) and FIX (correlation 0.35). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than AMP's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of AMP's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to AMP
BNYBank of New York Mellon
MSMorgan Stanley
SLFSun Life Financial
METMetLife
BLKBlackRock
SCHWCharles Schwab
PRUPrudential Financial
CMECME Group
SPGIS&P Global