Relative Intelligence · Life Insurance

How MetLife (MET) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on MET alone. It places MET (MetLife, Inc.) against 17 popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where MET stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: MET's full trading record, from April 2000 through September 2026. The crash tests reach back to 2000 using older funds and the S&P 500. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowMET has run far ahead of the market, rising 32.0% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. At a glance ↓
- Stock or market?MET held up far better than its industry: it rose 9.5% over the past 3 months while the life insurance ETF KIE (State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF) fell 1.2%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its life insurance peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: EQH (Equitable) rose 13.0%, while PFG (Principal Financial Group) fell 2.9%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, MET rose 32.2% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. By year ↓
- Long termMET turned $10,000 into $34,000 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashMET fell harder than the S&P 500 in five of six sell-offs. The 2022 bear market was the exception: MET fell 19.5%, less than the S&P 500's 24.5%. Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, MET has a correlation of 0.49 over 5 years, more closely than 72% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. Market capture ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- AFL (Aflac) earned more than MET with less volatility over the past 5 years: 19.0% a year at 20.8% volatility, against 12.0% a year at 25.4%.
- Nearby categories and themes
- WRB (W. R. Berkley, property & casualty insurance) and BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway, insurance) earned more than MET with less volatility over the past 5 years. WRB returned 18.9% a year at 22.9% volatility, against 12.0% a year at 25.4%.
- Whole market
- 156 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MET with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway), BRK-A (Berkshire Hathaway) and WMT (Walmart).
How much would $10,000 in MET have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in MET over the past 26 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of MET over the same span and MET's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
- $10,000 invested in MET at the end of September 2000 would have grown to $74,791 by September 2026, less than the $84,332 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Five of the seven other investments on the chart ended ahead of MET, and BLK finished highest, at $562,061.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2000 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 724 of the 1,261 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MET; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 2 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- BLK$562,061+5,521% total · +16.8% a year
- GL$170,782+1,608% total · +11.5% a year
- AJG$162,589+1,526% total · +11.3% a year
- ALL$119,222+1,092% total · +10.0% a year
- AFL$118,413+1,084% total · +10.0% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$84,332+743% total · +8.5% a year
- MET$74,791+648% total · +8.0% a year
- UNM$60,632+506% total · +7.2% a year
- LNC$17,480+74.8% total · +2.2% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 1,095 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of MET; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- JXN$63,053+531% total · +44.5% a year
- UNM$40,709+307% total · +32.4% a year
- CNO$24,982+150% total · +20.1% a year
- AFL$24,008+140% total · +19.1% a year
- WRB$23,533+135% total · +18.7% a year
- EQH$19,636+96.4% total · +14.4% a year
- ALL$19,616+96.2% total · +14.4% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
- BRK-B$18,244+82.4% total · +12.8% a year
- MET$17,726+77.3% total · +12.1% a year
MET at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- MET's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 82.4%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- MET is trading within 1% of its all-time high.
- Over 25 full calendar years, MET's best was 2013, when it returned 67.5%, and its worst was 2008, when it lost 42.2%. It lost money in nine of those years.
The company
- Market value
- $64B
- Industry
- Insurance - Life
- Price history from
- April 2000
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +32.2%total return
- Past 3 years
- +84.0%+22.5% a year
- Past 5 years
- +76.5%+12.0% a year
- Past 10 years
- +240%+13.0% a year
- Best calendar year
- +67.5%2013
- Worst calendar year
- −42.2%2008
- Losing years
- 9 of 25full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 25.4%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.58return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −82.4%Oct 2007 to Mar 2009
- From its all-time high
- At its highwithin 1%
MET against the whole market
Where MET ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does MET rank among all stocks?
This section ranks MET on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how MET stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- MET is among the steadier stocks: its price swings rank in the top 13% of the 2,893 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top is the calmest.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | MET | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +32.2% | 915 of 3,287 | top 28% |
| 3-year return | +84.0% | 1,087 of 3,017 | top 36% |
| 5-year return | +76.5% | 846 of 2,893 | top 29% |
| 10-year return | +240% | 745 of 2,202 | top 34% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 25.4% | 365 of 2,893 | top 13% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.58 | 728 of 2,893 | top 25% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −55.2% | 686 of 2,187 | top 31% |
What has beaten MET on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). MET sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than MET with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 49 stocks and 107 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than MET over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 4% of the 3,633 screened.
- Among those with at least half MET's swings, DXJ has the best return for its risk: 26.6% a year at 19.1% volatility, 25% less than MET's 25.4%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.34 against 0.58 for MET.
- Among MET's popular alternatives, AFL is in the region. AFL earned 19.0% a year against 12.0% a year for MET, at 20.8% volatility, 18% less than MET's 25.4%.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to MET; faint dots are 93 more of the 156 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 1 with more than 1.6× MET's volatility is in the table only
Is there a better investment than MET?
Investments that beat MET over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among MET's popular alternatives, AFL earned more than MET with less volatility over the past 5 years: 19.0% a year at 20.8% volatility, against 12.0% a year at 25.4%.
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WRB (property & casualty insurance) and BRK-B (insurance) earned more than MET with less volatility over the past 5 years. WRB returned 18.9% a year at 22.9% volatility, against 12.0% a year at 25.4%.
- Across the whole market, 156 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than MET with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them BRK-B, BRK-A and WMT.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat MET over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks MET's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than MET follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than MET's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× MET's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than MET's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with MET?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +12.0% | 25.4% | 0.58 | −55.2% | +240% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.49 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 3 shownThe investments people most often weigh against MET. 3 of 15 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.0% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | +356% | 0.45 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatility | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.70 | — | ||
JXNJackson Financial Inc. · Life Insurance | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +41.7% | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | — | 0.62 | — | |
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 6 shownEverything else in Life Insurance and Insurance and the categories next to it (Property & Casualty Insurance, Asset Management, Retirement Services), plus MET's specific themes. 20 of 65 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.45 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.47 | — | ||
VCTRVictory Capital Holdings, Inc. · Asset Management | Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +28.1% | 35.0% | 0.89 | −45.2% | — | 0.52 | — | |
RGAReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated · Insurance | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher return in most periods | +19.7% | 27.3% | 0.80 | −65.8% | +199% | 0.56 | — | |
ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Higher return, similar volatilitySmaller losses in recent crashes | +20.1% | 24.5% | 0.87 | −53.8% | +309% | 0.46 | — | |
| Similar return, lower volatility | +11.7% | 19.4% | 0.67 | −50.8% | +255% | 0.54 | — | ||
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 471 of 3,553 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.26 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.30 | — | ||
| Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +19.6% | 24.9% | 0.85 | −24.9% | +266% | 0.27 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.23 | — | ||
CBOECboe Global Markets, Inc. · Capital Markets | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +21.5% | 25.1% | 0.91 | −43.2% | +463% | 0.18 | — | |
SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.37 | 0.80% | |
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | -0.04 | — | ||
| Similar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineSmaller losses in recent crashes | +12.1% | 13.7% | 0.90 | −36.8% | +235% | 0.69 | 0.03% | ||
What these numbers mean for MET
- Annual return
- MET returned 12.0% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $17,700. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- MET's volatility over the past 5 years was 25.4%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MET's return lands within 25.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- MET's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.58, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MET earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- MET's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 55.2%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 55.2% fall takes a 123% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, MET's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.49 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MET instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MET holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 156 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than MET with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 100 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with MET | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.26 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +14.7% | 16.8% | 0.91 | −37.0% | +204% | 0.30 | — | |
| 3 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.37 | 0.80% |
| 4 | Whole market | +13.9% | 18.5% | 0.80 | −34.0% | +446% | 0.14 | — | |
| 5 | DIVBiShares Core Dividend ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.9% | 15.4% | 0.93 | −36.9% | — | 0.69 | 0.05% |
| 6 | Whole market | +17.3% | 18.2% | 0.97 | −40.0% | +352% | 0.62 | — | |
| 7 | RWLInvesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.7% | 14.4% | 0.97 | −36.1% | +287% | 0.66 | 0.39% |
| 8 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.24 | — | |
| 9 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Same or nearby category | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.45 | — |
| 10 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.21 | 0.48% |
| 11 | LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.47 | 0.40% |
| 12 | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.9% | 0.82 | −31.4% | +685% | 0.22 | — | |
| 13 | Whole market | +14.5% | 23.0% | 0.71 | −35.1% | +553% | 0.21 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.39 | — | |
| 15 | Whole market | +17.1% | 20.7% | 0.87 | −26.8% | +226% | 0.21 | — | |
| 16 | CHCOCity Holding Company · Banks - Regional | Whole market | +15.9% | 22.8% | 0.77 | −32.3% | +286% | 0.63 | — |
| 17 | Whole market | +15.8% | 20.0% | 0.84 | −42.0% | +310% | 0.59 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.34 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +17.7% | 18.9% | 0.96 | −26.4% | +213% | -0.11 | 0.40% | |
| 20 | EQLALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.5% | 0.94 | −34.2% | +387% | 0.57 | 0.19% |
| 21 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.46 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.36 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +16.5% | 23.1% | 0.78 | −48.4% | +808% | 0.37 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +15.9% | 23.4% | 0.75 | −42.0% | +393% | 0.32 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +14.8% | 23.6% | 0.71 | −32.8% | +625% | 0.24 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.18 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.17 | — | |
| 28 | Whole market | +14.4% | 22.1% | 0.72 | −42.7% | +481% | 0.33 | — | |
| 29 | Whole market | +14.7% | 17.5% | 0.87 | −34.7% | — | 0.43 | 0.26% | |
| 30 | Same or nearby category | +13.4% | 17.1% | 0.82 | −29.6% | +274% | 0.47 | — | |
| 31 | EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.9% | 0.88 | −43.2% | +157% | 0.55 | 0.31% |
| 32 | ATOAtmos Energy Corporation · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.4% | 0.85 | −32.9% | +194% | 0.32 | — |
| 33 | FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 16.3% | 0.87 | −40.2% | +194% | 0.48 | 0.25% |
| 34 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.46 | 0.13% |
| 35 | AVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +14.0% | 16.9% | 0.86 | −19.5% | — | 0.65 | 0.15% |
| 36 | PVALPutnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +16.1% | 15.1% | 1.07 | −41.3% | — | 0.68 | 0.56% |
| 37 | AVDVAvantis International Small Cap Value ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 17.4% | 0.84 | −43.0% | — | 0.45 | 0.36% |
| 38 | NINiSource Inc · Gas Utilities | Whole market | +15.1% | 20.3% | 0.80 | −30.9% | +158% | 0.33 | — |
| 39 | Same or nearby category | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.63 | — | |
| 40 | PAVEGlobal X - U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF · Infrastructure Equity | Whole market | +14.9% | 21.6% | 0.75 | −44.1% | — | 0.51 | 0.47% |
| 41 | FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.2% | 14.6% | 0.92 | −40.2% | +253% | 0.64 | 0.15% |
| 42 | DBEFXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.1% | 13.8% | 0.96 | −32.5% | +206% | 0.44 | 0.35% |
| 43 | Same or nearby category | +15.7% | 20.4% | 0.82 | −42.6% | +248% | 0.57 | — | |
| 44 | IOOiShares Global 100 ETF · Global Equity | Whole market | +15.7% | 17.2% | 0.94 | −31.4% | +361% | 0.43 | 0.40% |
| 45 | MGCVanguard Morningstar Mega Cap ETF · US Large-Cap Equity | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.4% | 0.81 | −33.1% | +353% | 0.45 | 0.05% |
| 46 | PNWPinnacle West Capital Corporation · Electric Utilities | Whole market | +13.4% | 19.9% | 0.73 | −39.3% | +103% | 0.26 | — |
| 47 | FDLFirst Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund · US Dividend Equity | Whole market | +13.9% | 14.4% | 0.98 | −41.4% | +199% | 0.64 | 0.43% |
| 48 | JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · US Quality Equity | Whole market | +13.6% | 15.7% | 0.89 | −32.9% | — | 0.52 | 0.12% |
| 49 | VLUEiShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF · US Large-Cap Value | Whole market | +15.9% | 18.4% | 0.90 | −39.5% | +286% | 0.57 | 0.15% |
| 50 | PPAInvesco Aerospace & Defense ETF · Aerospace & Defense | Whole market | +16.3% | 18.9% | 0.90 | −43.9% | +344% | 0.48 | 0.58% |
| 51 | EMLPFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund · Energy Infrastructure | Whole market | +14.9% | 14.5% | 1.04 | −43.6% | +150% | 0.49 | 0.95% |
| 52 | USMCPrincipal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.1% | 16.4% | 0.89 | −30.0% | — | 0.43 | 0.12% |
| 53 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.48 | 0.61% |
| 54 | GCOWPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 13.6% | 1.04 | −37.6% | +168% | 0.50 | 0.60% |
| 55 | LLoews Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Same or nearby category | +14.3% | 19.2% | 0.80 | −48.5% | +180% | 0.58 | — |
| 56 | TDIVFirst Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund · Technology Equity | Whole market | +16.2% | 21.3% | 0.81 | −32.0% | +388% | 0.34 | 0.50% |
| 57 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.46 | — | |
| 58 | IDMOInvesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +13.3% | 18.2% | 0.78 | −31.3% | +229% | 0.52 | 0.25% |
| 59 | GARPiShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.5% | 22.5% | 0.83 | −31.4% | — | 0.33 | 0.15% |
| 60 | FRDMFreedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF · International | Whole market | +17.3% | 22.8% | 0.82 | −40.5% | — | 0.24 | 0.49% |
| 61 | SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF · Technology | Whole market | +15.0% | 19.5% | 0.82 | −30.8% | — | 0.32 | 0.45% |
| 62 | WTVWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.4% | 17.0% | 0.83 | −42.2% | +303% | 0.69 | 0.12% |
| 63 | ORIOld Republic International Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Same or nearby category | +17.0% | 22.2% | 0.82 | −47.8% | +349% | 0.50 | — |
| 64 | DIVIFranklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF · International | Whole market | +13.4% | 15.5% | 0.89 | −27.7% | +184% | 0.43 | 0.09% |
| 65 | PWVInvesco Large Cap Value ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +13.5% | 14.2% | 0.97 | −37.6% | +223% | 0.73 | 0.55% |
| 66 | THGThe Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Same or nearby category | +14.4% | 22.9% | 0.70 | −40.1% | +291% | 0.54 | — |
| 67 | WTMWhite Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. · Insurance | Same or nearby category | +15.4% | 23.6% | 0.73 | −40.2% | +169% | 0.33 | — |
| 68 | FFLCFidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +15.7% | 16.8% | 0.95 | −19.7% | — | 0.58 | 0.38% |
| 69 | AUSFGlobal X - Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF · International | Whole market | +13.2% | 13.6% | 0.99 | −44.2% | — | 0.64 | 0.27% |
| 70 | VFMFVanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.3% | 17.6% | 0.85 | −41.3% | — | 0.70 | 0.18% |
| 71 | COMTiShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF · Commodities | Whole market | +13.1% | 21.1% | 0.69 | −39.2% | +160% | 0.30 | 0.49% |
| 72 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.18 | 0.45% |
| 73 | UTESVirtus Reaves Utilities ETF · Alternatives | Whole market | +13.6% | 21.1% | 0.71 | −35.4% | +210% | 0.27 | 0.49% |
| 74 | HLALWahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +14.0% | 18.0% | 0.82 | −33.6% | — | 0.39 | 0.50% |
| 75 | NANRState Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +17.4% | 22.6% | 0.83 | −49.1% | +241% | 0.49 | 0.35% |
| 76 | EWJViShares MSCI Japan Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.9% | 18.2% | 0.86 | −30.1% | — | 0.39 | 0.15% |
| 77 | DGTState Street SPDR Global Dow ETF · International | Whole market | +13.8% | 15.1% | 0.94 | −34.4% | +261% | 0.60 | 0.50% |
| 78 | FYLDCambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF · Dividend & Income | Whole market | +13.1% | 16.0% | 0.85 | −44.6% | +203% | 0.50 | 0.59% |
| 79 | UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund · Energy | Whole market | +18.7% | 19.2% | 0.99 | −48.1% | — | 0.54 | 0.85% |
| 80 | IDOGALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF · International | Whole market | +14.1% | 15.6% | 0.93 | −37.3% | +180% | 0.47 | 0.50% |
| 81 | NXTGFirst Trust Indxx NextG ETF · Technology | Whole market | +16.2% | 19.1% | 0.89 | −33.6% | +330% | 0.26 | 0.70% |
| 82 | GVALCambria Global Value ETF · International | Whole market | +14.4% | 18.7% | 0.82 | −46.8% | +173% | 0.47 | 0.68% |
| 83 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.28 | — | |
| 84 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 0.48 | — | |
| 85 | Whole market | +17.8% | 21.4% | 0.88 | −53.7% | +140% | 0.38 | — | |
| 86 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.40 | — | |
| 87 | Whole market | +16.4% | 17.1% | 0.98 | −58.1% | +178% | 0.46 | — | |
| 88 | Whole market | +13.6% | 21.4% | 0.71 | −51.0% | +295% | 0.57 | — | |
| 89 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.42 | — | |
| 90 | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.4% | 0.67 | −34.5% | +451% | 0.28 | 0.04% | |
| 91 | PBAPembina Pipeline Corporation · Oil & Gas Midstream | Whole market | +13.8% | 21.5% | 0.71 | −70.9% | +172% | 0.46 | — |
| 92 | RPRXRoyalty Pharma plc · Pharmaceuticals | Whole market | +13.3% | 23.8% | 0.65 | −49.7% | — | 0.17 | — |
| 93 | AMLPAlerian MLP ETF · Energy Equity | Whole market | +16.1% | 18.9% | 0.89 | −72.9% | +91.0% | 0.53 | 1.01% |
| 94 | Same or nearby category | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.61 | — | |
| 95 | KTKT Corporation · Integrated Telecommunications | Whole market | +13.1% | 22.6% | 0.66 | −60.3% | +84.9% | 0.24 | — |
| 96 | HIGThe Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Same or nearby category | +15.6% | 22.0% | 0.77 | −57.6% | +294% | 0.63 | — |
| 97 | Popular alternative | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.70 | — | |
| 98 | EUFNiShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF · Financial Sector Equity | Whole market | +18.5% | 21.8% | 0.89 | −53.2% | +233% | 0.58 | 0.49% |
| 99 | BATRAAtlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. · Entertainment | Whole market | +15.3% | 22.0% | 0.76 | −54.2% | +224% | 0.41 | — |
| 100 | MDUMDU Resources Group, Inc. · Regulated Gas | Whole market | +13.2% | 23.0% | 0.66 | −51.4% | +168% | 0.35 | — |
MET against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against MET, compared period by period and year by year.
How do MET's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at MET, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- Only AFL was both more rewarding and calmer than MET over the past 5 years, earning a higher annual return with lower volatility.
- Over the past 5 years, MET returned 12.0% a year, less than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (25.4% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than MET with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| JXN Jackson Financial Inc. | +41.7% | 43.3% |
| UNM Unum Group | +30.6% | 29.3% |
| AFL Aflac Incorporated | +19.0% | 20.8% |
| CNO CNO Financial Group, Inc. | +18.8% | 28.1% |
| ALL The Allstate Corporation | +17.0% | 26.2% |
| PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | +13.0% | 26.5% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc. | +12.6% | 32.9% |
| GL Globe Life Inc. | +12.4% | 35.6% |
| MET This pageMetLife, Inc. | +12.0% | 25.4% |
| AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | +10.9% | 24.2% |
| KIE State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF | +10.8% | 18.5% |
| VOYA Voya Financial, Inc. | +8.8% | 28.9% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | +7.1% | 27.1% |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | +5.2% | 25.5% |
| BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | −1.7% | 42.6% |
| LNC Lincoln National Corporation | −7.4% | 42.7% |
Has MET consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares MET with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than MET helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- None of the 17 popular alternatives outperformed MET in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes. The closest was CNO.
- JXN, AFL and ALL earned more for the risk they took than MET (a higher Sharpe ratio) and fell less in their worst decline of the past 10 years.
- ALL outperformed MET over all three long-term periods but in none of the five short-term ones, so MET has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than MET over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| MET MetLife, Inc. (this page) | — | +4.7% | +9.5% | +32.0% | +28.6% | +32.2% | +84.0% | +76.5% | +240% | 25.4% | 0.58 | −55.2% | — | $64B | — |
| CNO Insurance - LifeCNO Financial Group, Inc. | 2/5 short3/3 long | +0.8% | +3.8% | +25.7% | +31.5% | +41.1% | +150% | +136% | +342% | 28.1% | 0.76 | −63.8% | — | $5.1B | — |
| ALL Insurance - Property & CasualtyThe Allstate Corporation | 0/5 short3/3 long | +2.9% | −1.1% | +17.3% | +24.4% | +31.5% | +116% | +119% | +356% | 26.2% | 0.73 | −41.4% | — | $63B | — |
| UNM Insurance - LifeUnum Group | 0/5 short3/3 long | −0.1% | +5.8% | +19.3% | +23.2% | +26.4% | +106% | +279% | +256% | 29.3% | 1.06 | −81.0% | — | $15B | — |
| EQH Asset ManagementEquitable Holdings, Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | +0.3% | +13.0% | +31.5% | +15.0% | +15.6% | +116% | +81.1% | — | 32.9% | 0.53 | −61.3% | — | $15B | — |
| JXN Insurance - LifeJackson Financial Inc. | 1/5 short2/3 long | −1.1% | +6.7% | +18.9% | +24.3% | +37.6% | +269% | +472% | — | 43.3% | 1.03 | −48.4% | — | $8.8B | — |
| AFL Insurance - LifeAflac Incorporated | 0/5 short2/3 long | +4.4% | −2.6% | +6.0% | +10.8% | +12.9% | +65.2% | +139% | +335% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | — | $60B | — |
| BLK Asset ManagementBlackRock, Inc. | 0/5 short2/3 long | +3.5% | +7.6% | +8.8% | +5.7% | −0.6% | +96.3% | +41.1% | +313% | 27.1% | 0.39 | −43.9% | — | $175B | — |
| AJG Insurance - BrokersArthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +9.6% | +2.5% | +16.9% | +2.2% | −6.1% | +17.3% | +68.0% | +516% | 24.2% | 0.55 | −44.4% | — | $66B | — |
| PFG Asset ManagementPrincipal Financial Group, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −7.3% | −2.9% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +41.4% | +76.3% | +84.6% | +196% | 26.5% | 0.60 | −64.7% | — | $23B | — |
| CRBG Asset ManagementCorebridge Financial, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +0.4% | +12.7% | +32.2% | +18.2% | +13.8% | +98.8% | — | — | — | — | −36.3% | — | $16B | — |
| VOYA Insurance - LifeVoya Financial, Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −4.9% | −2.6% | +28.0% | +28.6% | +32.6% | +55.8% | +52.3% | +253% | 28.9% | 0.44 | −52.1% | — | $8.7B | — |
| GL Insurance - LifeGlobe Life Inc. | 0/5 short1/3 long | −1.2% | −7.7% | +12.8% | +23.6% | +26.3% | +58.0% | +79.7% | +188% | 35.6% | 0.56 | −61.6% | — | $13B | — |
| LNC Insurance - LifeLincoln National Corporation | 0/5 short1/3 long | −4.1% | −3.9% | +9.0% | −8.0% | +6.2% | +111% | −32.1% | +20.1% | 42.7% | 0.04 | −79.2% | — | $7.6B | — |
| KIE FinancialsState Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF | 0/5 short0/3 long | +2.9% | −1.2% | +8.8% | +7.4% | +12.8% | +56.7% | +67.1% | +203% | 18.5% | 0.65 | −44.3% | 0.35% | $532M | — |
| PRU Insurance - LifePrudential Financial, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −2.8% | −1.2% | +15.2% | +5.2% | +19.6% | +47.5% | +29.0% | +117% | 25.5% | 0.33 | −65.9% | — | $40B | — |
| BHF Insurance - LifeBrighthouse Financial, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −4.4% | −26.6% | −23.0% | −26.2% | +2.2% | +3.1% | −8.1% | — | 42.6% | 0.17 | −76.9% | — | $2.7B | — |
| FG Insurance - LifeF&G Annuities & Life, Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −11.9% | −33.9% | −24.1% | −30.9% | −29.0% | −25.8% | — | — | — | — | −58.8% | — | $2.7B | — |
How did MET do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 2001, along with where MET ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with MET and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, MET finished in the top quarter in one of 25 years and in the bottom quarter in five. In 2025, it ranked 16 of 18.
- MET finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 11 of its 25 full calendar years.
- Among its popular alternatives, BLK came out ahead of MET most often, in 19 of the 25 years both traded.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of MET; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places MET among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of MET | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET This pageMetLife, Inc. | — | −0.8% | +27.7% | −5.5% | +19.2% | +37.5% | −3.4% | +28.8% | −15.8% | +8.4% | +15.9% | −8.3% | +3.0% | +67.5% | +7.9% | −28.3% | +27.9% | +3.7% | −42.2% | +5.6% | +21.7% | +22.2% | +21.8% | +25.4% | −13.9% | −8.8% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 1 of 25 | 16 of 18 | 9 of 18 | 17 of 18 | 5 of 16 | 6 of 15 | 8 of 15 | 8 of 15 | 4 of 14 | 13 of 13 | 10 of 13 | 8 of 13 | 9 of 13 | 6 of 12 | 10 of 12 | 11 of 12 | 5 of 12 | 8 of 12 | 7 of 12 | 6 of 12 | 5 of 12 | 4 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 5 of 10 | 8 of 10 | 6 of 8 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 13 of 25 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% |
| CNO CNO Financial Group, Inc. | 10 of 22 | +16.1% | +36.1% | +25.1% | −1.6% | +9.5% | +25.9% | +25.1% | −38.5% | +31.0% | +2.1% | +12.5% | −1.3% | +91.1% | +48.8% | −7.0% | +35.6% | −3.3% | −58.8% | −37.1% | −13.8% | +16.2% | −8.5% | — | — | — |
| ALL The Allstate Corporation | 14 of 25 | +10.1% | +40.6% | +6.4% | +18.4% | +9.9% | −0.1% | +38.8% | −19.5% | +43.6% | +21.7% | −9.9% | +31.2% | +38.6% | +50.2% | −11.4% | +9.1% | −5.1% | −34.5% | −17.6% | +23.4% | +6.9% | +23.1% | +19.4% | +12.3% | −21.0% |
| UNM Unum Group | 14 of 25 | +8.6% | +66.3% | +13.7% | +73.5% | +11.9% | −16.2% | +2.7% | −45.2% | +27.2% | +35.1% | −2.6% | +1.2% | +71.9% | +0.9% | −11.6% | +25.9% | +6.9% | −20.6% | +16.1% | −7.4% | +28.9% | +16.0% | −7.6% | −32.1% | +0.8% |
| EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc. | 5 of 7 | +3.2% | +45.0% | +19.6% | −10.2% | +31.0% | +6.5% | +53.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JXN Jackson Financial Inc. | 3 of 4 | +26.9% | +76.4% | +57.2% | −11.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AFL Aflac Incorporated | 13 of 25 | +8.9% | +28.1% | +17.3% | +26.4% | +34.6% | −13.6% | +18.6% | +6.2% | +29.0% | +19.1% | +0.5% | −6.2% | +28.9% | +26.4% | −21.3% | +24.8% | +4.3% | −25.5% | +38.3% | +0.4% | +17.6% | +11.2% | +21.4% | +23.7% | −31.6% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 19 of 25 | +6.6% | +29.3% | +17.9% | −20.4% | +29.4% | +47.2% | +31.9% | −21.6% | +38.2% | +14.6% | −2.4% | +15.7% | +57.0% | +19.8% | −3.6% | −15.9% | +76.6% | −37.0% | +45.1% | +41.8% | +42.4% | +47.6% | +35.9% | −5.5% | −0.7% |
| AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 12 of 25 | −8.0% | +27.4% | +20.5% | +12.4% | +39.0% | +32.1% | +31.8% | +19.2% | +25.1% | +31.1% | −10.1% | +3.5% | +40.0% | +7.6% | +20.3% | +35.6% | −7.8% | +12.7% | −14.3% | −0.1% | −1.2% | +3.3% | +13.4% | −13.1% | +10.4% |
| PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 17 of 24 | +18.4% | +1.9% | −2.8% | +20.1% | +51.4% | −5.2% | +29.7% | −35.0% | +25.5% | +33.1% | −10.8% | +8.0% | +77.2% | +19.4% | −22.3% | +38.2% | +8.6% | −66.5% | +18.8% | +25.5% | +17.3% | +25.6% | +11.3% | +26.6% | — |
| CRBG Corebridge Financial, Inc. | 3 of 3 | +3.9% | +42.9% | +25.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VOYA Voya Financial, Inc. | 6 of 12 | +11.1% | −3.4% | +20.7% | −6.1% | +14.0% | −2.5% | +52.8% | −18.8% | +26.3% | +6.4% | −12.8% | +20.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GL Globe Life Inc. | 15 of 25 | +26.5% | −7.5% | +1.8% | +29.7% | −0.5% | −8.9% | +42.3% | −17.2% | +23.9% | +30.3% | +6.3% | +5.0% | +53.2% | +20.5% | +10.2% | +37.6% | −0.5% | −25.2% | −4.3% | +15.6% | −1.9% | +26.6% | +25.9% | −6.2% | +3.2% |
| LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 11 of 25 | +48.0% | +24.8% | −5.5% | −53.5% | +39.5% | −11.1% | +17.9% | −32.0% | +18.0% | +35.0% | −11.5% | +13.1% | +102% | +35.3% | −29.6% | +11.9% | +33.5% | −66.4% | −10.3% | +28.6% | +17.2% | +19.2% | +32.9% | −32.8% | +5.4% |
| KIE State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF | 10 of 20 | +8.1% | +27.0% | +12.2% | +3.5% | +22.7% | −3.1% | +27.2% | −6.0% | +12.8% | +21.4% | +6.0% | +7.7% | +45.5% | +20.7% | −12.0% | +26.0% | +28.1% | −46.7% | −5.7% | +8.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 15 of 24 | +0.2% | +19.4% | +10.1% | −3.9% | +45.3% | −11.4% | +20.1% | −26.5% | +13.6% | +32.5% | −7.4% | +0.7% | +77.1% | +9.9% | −12.1% | +20.5% | +66.8% | −66.3% | +9.7% | +18.7% | +34.5% | +33.3% | +33.4% | −3.1% | — |
| BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | 3 of 8 | +34.9% | −9.2% | +3.2% | −1.0% | +43.1% | −7.7% | +28.7% | −48.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FG F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. | 1 of 3 | −23.6% | −8.0% | +137% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Risk and diversification
How MET has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were MET's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents MET's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 2000, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of MET's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: MET fell 35.1% from November 2022 to May 2023, while the S&P 500 rose 2.8%.
- The slowest recovery came after MET fell 82.4% from October 2007 to March 2009; it did not regain that peak until December 2016, eight years later.
Green means MET fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | MET fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 financial crisis | −82.4% | −54.6% | Oct 2007 | Mar 2009 | 17 months | Dec 2016 | 7.8 years |
| Covid crash | −55.2% | −33.5% | Feb 2020 | Mar 2020 | 1 month | Jan 2021 | 10 months |
| Dot-com bust | −42.8% | −39.3% | Dec 2000 | Oct 2002 | 22 months | Mar 2004 | 17 months |
| 2023 regional bank crisis | −35.1% | +2.8% | Nov 2022 | May 2023 | 6 months | Mar 2024 | 10 months |
| Late-2018 sell-off | −28.3% | −6.8% | Nov 2017 | Dec 2018 | 13 months | Jan 2020 | 13 months |
How did MET do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far MET, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
Note: MET began trading on April 5, 2000, so its row reads "Not yet trading" for the dot-com bust. The older alternatives and the S&P 500 show how those crashes played out.
- MET fell further than the S&P 500 in seven of the nine crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when MET fell 82.3% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
- Among its popular alternatives, AJG held up best, falling less than MET in all nine crashes they both traded through.
- MET began trading after the dot-com bust, but seven of its popular alternatives lived through it. The mildest fall among them was GL's 27.4%, against 47.5% for the S&P 500.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than MET.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET This pageMetLife, Inc. | — | −12.6% | −19.5% | −55.0% | −20.9% | −6.9% | −36.5% | −36.3% | −3.4% | −82.3% | Not yet trading |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 7 of 9 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| CNO CNO Financial Group, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −13.3% | −35.4% | −53.5% | −36.4% | −6.5% | −26.9% | −36.2% | −7.5% | −97.7% | — |
| ALL The Allstate Corporation | 6 of 9 | −6.7% | −20.3% | −40.8% | −23.7% | −8.0% | −10.8% | −20.3% | −0.8% | −74.8% | −30.6% |
| UNM Unum Group | 5 of 9 | −16.7% | −14.8% | −65.5% | −32.2% | −9.2% | −34.8% | −21.4% | −1.0% | −69.1% | −47.6% |
| EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc. | 0 of 4 | −17.7% | −30.6% | −61.3% | −33.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| JXN Jackson Financial Inc. | 0 of 2 | −14.2% | −48.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AFL Aflac Incorporated | 6 of 9 | −6.0% | −19.9% | −51.0% | −13.2% | −6.4% | −15.8% | −31.4% | −4.3% | −82.7% | −36.7% |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 6 of 9 | −7.2% | −40.8% | −42.3% | −25.2% | −7.1% | −19.9% | −23.9% | 0.0% | −60.4% | −33.0% |
| AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 9 of 9 | −4.8% | −18.8% | −37.0% | −11.5% | −6.1% | −23.1% | −13.4% | −1.1% | −46.0% | −41.2% |
| PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −13.3% | −21.1% | −56.3% | −31.5% | −9.0% | −39.9% | −26.8% | −2.4% | −91.5% | — |
| CRBG Corebridge Financial, Inc. | 0 of 1 | −14.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VOYA Voya Financial, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −11.2% | −23.3% | −52.1% | −28.6% | −8.9% | −43.1% | — | — | — | — |
| GL Globe Life Inc. | 6 of 9 | −9.8% | −16.6% | −47.7% | −20.5% | −8.7% | −22.7% | −20.9% | −3.3% | −73.7% | −27.4% |
| LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 0 of 9 | −21.0% | −40.4% | −72.0% | −30.6% | −11.1% | −45.9% | −48.5% | −3.0% | −92.4% | −52.1% |
| KIE State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF | 9 of 9 | −8.5% | −15.7% | −44.1% | −17.9% | −5.9% | −15.3% | −24.3% | −2.0% | −74.6% | — |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 2 of 9 | −13.3% | −27.4% | −58.2% | −26.8% | −11.9% | −35.8% | −27.9% | −3.1% | −88.3% | — |
| BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | 0 of 5 | −18.0% | −35.2% | −65.9% | −37.4% | −10.8% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FG F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. | 1 of 1 | −9.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
How closely does MET move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares MET with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- Seven of the 12 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than MET's 0.94, led by AJG, ALL and AFL.
- AJG took just 46% of the S&P 500's losses, against 97% for MET, while still keeping 80% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, MET captured 91% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 97% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 1.03. Its share of the market's losses was slightly larger than its share of the gains.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than MET's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET This pageMetLife, Inc. | 91% | 97% | 0.94 | 1.03 |
| AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 80% | 46% | 1.74 | 0.61 |
| ALL The Allstate Corporation | 68% | 41% | 1.66 | 0.49 |
| AFL Aflac Incorporated | 83% | 71% | 1.17 | 0.79 |
| CNO CNO Financial Group, Inc. | 103% | 102% | 1.00 | 1.09 |
| GL Globe Life Inc. | 72% | 72% | 1.00 | 0.79 |
| UNM Unum Group | 88% | 90% | 0.98 | 0.96 |
| KIE State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF | 75% | 77% | 0.97 | 0.78 |
| VOYA Voya Financial, Inc. | 111% | 128% | 0.87 | 1.17 |
| PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc. | 103% | 124% | 0.83 | 1.22 |
| BLK BlackRock, Inc. | 127% | 157% | 0.81 | 1.30 |
| PRU Prudential Financial, Inc. | 102% | 146% | 0.70 | 1.25 |
| LNC Lincoln National Corporation | 119% | 211% | 0.56 | 1.67 |
What diversifies MET?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with MET's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing MET with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in MET into GLD would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 20% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+12.1% for MET alone, +14.2% for the mix).
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of MET over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.49 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
- FIX made money in six of the nine calendar years in which MET lost money.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which MET lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% MET and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2023 | 2020 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET MetLife, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +76.5% | 0.58 | −0.8% | −5.5% | −3.4% | −15.8% | −8.3% | −28.3% | −42.2% | −13.9% | −8.8% | 24.9% | +12.1% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.47 | +119% | 1.48 | +27.1% | +17.4% | −9.0% | −5.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 20.9% | +13.5% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.21 | +225% | 1.34 | +32.8% | +42.0% | +3.9% | −19.8% | +7.7% | −16.1% | −20.8% | — | — | 20.6% | +15.6% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.49 | +101% | 1.04 | +9.7% | +8.0% | −13.4% | −8.7% | −25.3% | — | — | — | — | 21.5% | +13.2% |
| EWP Broad MarketiShares MSCI Spain ETF | 0.46 | +140% | 0.97 | +78.0% | +30.3% | −4.0% | −15.3% | −15.6% | −9.8% | −36.8% | −13.6% | −9.2% | 21.9% | +14.3% |
| SMH TechnologyVanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.10 | +323% | 0.97 | +49.2% | +73.4% | +55.5% | −9.1% | −0.3% | +6.8% | −44.7% | −47.0% | −14.6% | 21.8% | +18.3% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.44 | +85.0% | 0.96 | +23.1% | +20.1% | +2.1% | −9.5% | +4.1% | — | — | — | — | 21.0% | +12.9% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | -0.11 | +126% | 0.96 | +63.7% | +12.7% | +24.8% | −1.9% | −10.7% | +9.6% | +4.9% | — | — | 19.9% | +14.2% |
| SPMO Broad MarketInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.46 | +136% | 0.93 | +26.6% | +17.6% | +28.2% | −0.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 22.1% | +14.5% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2025 | 2023 | 2020 | 2018 | 2015 | 2011 | 2008 | 2002 | 2001 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET MetLife, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +76.5% | 0.58 | −0.8% | −5.5% | −3.4% | −15.8% | −8.3% | −28.3% | −42.2% | −13.9% | −8.8% | 24.9% | +12.1% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.23 | +479% | 1.55 | +76.3% | +34.1% | +10.1% | −24.5% | +12.6% | +8.1% | −39.6% | −8.3% | −2.5% | 21.8% | +17.8% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.27 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +220% | +160% | −2.4% | −16.3% | −6.0% | −24.4% | −20.5% | −65.1% | −25.6% | 25.7% | +30.4% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.23 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +121% | +79.6% | +6.7% | +0.8% | +67.7% | −17.0% | −15.2% | −9.4% | +73.7% | 23.7% | +26.5% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.18 | +413% | 1.44 | +44.5% | +24.1% | +27.1% | −28.4% | −4.5% | +11.8% | −40.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | 21.4% | +17.3% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.42 | +690% | 1.41 | +19.2% | +30.4% | −27.4% | −8.2% | +17.4% | — | — | — | — | 23.4% | +19.6% |
Common questions
What was MET's worst drawdown?
MET's deepest decline since it began trading in 2000 was 82.4%, from October 2007 to March 2009. It took about eight years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were MET's best and worst years?
Over 25 full calendar years, MET's best year was 2013, when it returned 67.5%. Its worst was 2008, with a return of -42.2%.
Is there a better investment than MET?
Among MET's popular alternatives, AFL earned more than MET with less volatility over the past 5 years: 19.0% a year at 20.8% volatility, against 12.0% a year at 25.4%. Looking beyond its popular alternatives, WRB (property & casualty insurance) and BRK-B (insurance) earned more than MET with less volatility over the past 5 years. WRB returned 18.9% a year at 22.9% volatility, against 12.0% a year at 25.4%.
Is MET more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. MET's volatility over the past 5 years was 25.4%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, MET's return lands within 25.4% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is MET's Sharpe ratio?
MET's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.58, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so MET earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is MET with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, MET's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.49 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against MET instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a MET holding.
What are the best alternatives to MET?
None of the 17 popular alternatives we compared outperformed MET in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, which says more about MET's strength than about its alternatives.
Did MET outperform the S&P 500?
MET finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 11 of 25 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned -0.8%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did MET do in stock market crashes?
MET fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in one of the nine major crashes it has traded through, and further in seven. The clearest case was the 2008 financial crisis, when MET fell 82.3% and the S&P 500 fell 55.2%.
What diversifies MET?
These had a low correlation with MET over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.47), DXJ (correlation 0.21) and EMLP (correlation 0.49); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.23), CLS (correlation 0.27) and FIX (correlation 0.23). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than MET's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of MET's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.