Relative Intelligence · Communications Equipment

How Cisco Systems (CSCO) compares with the whole market and its popular alternatives
Built by QuantCommons' quantitative engine, this page is about relative opportunity, not data on CSCO alone. It places CSCO (Cisco Systems, Inc.) against 20+ popular alternatives, its neighboring categories and the entire market of over 10,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, and surfaces what has done better on consistent outperformance, return for the risk taken, behavior in real market crashes and diversification. The result is a clearer view of where CSCO stands in the market, and of the alternatives worth a closer look.
Period covered: CSCO's full trading record, from February 1990 through September 2026. All returns include reinvested dividends. Data as of October 20, 2026.
Data as of October 20, 2026. Full tables and charts read best on a larger screen.
On this page12 sections
Key findings
- Right nowCSCO has outpaced the market, rising 22.6% over the past 6 months against 9.1% for the S&P 500 and 11.2% for the Nasdaq 100. Not every peer went the same way. Over the past 6 months, HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise) rose 103% and NOK (Nokia Oyj) fell 14.3%. Consistency ↓
- Stock or market?The weakness is CSCO's own: it fell 3.2% over the past 3 months while the technology sector ETF XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) rose 5.7%. The S&P 500 rose 3.9%. Its communications equipment peers did not move as one over the past 3 months: HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise) rose 26.3%, while COHR (Coherent) fell 18.8%.
- Past 1 to 3 yearsOver the past year, CSCO rose 53.8% against 15.8% for the S&P 500 and 17.9% for the Nasdaq 100. The same gap shows up over 3 years (118% against 89.3%). By year ↓
- Long termCSCO turned $10,000 into $47,400 over the past decade, against $42,100 in the S&P 500. CSCO's 10-year return of 374% puts it ahead of 80% of the stocks worth at least $300 million with that much history. The S&P 500 returned 321%. Growth of $10,000 ↓
- In a crashAcross seven sell-offs, CSCO has typically fallen 1.3 times as far as the S&P 500. The 2022 bear market took 35.4% off CSCO, against 24.5% for the S&P 500. That was more than HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise, 30.5%) but less than ANET (Arista Networks, 36.6%). Crash tests ↓
- DiversificationAgainst the S&P 500, CSCO has a correlation of 0.60 over 5 years, more closely than 90% of stocks worth at least $300 million. Next to an index fund it is some diversification, but not a hedge. CSCO fell in 17 of the 22 months the S&P 500 fell over the past 5 years: it usually fell with it. By year ↓
- Better options
- Popular alternatives
- DELL (Dell Technologies), LITE (Lumentum) and PANW (Palo Alto Networks) were ahead of CSCO in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (54.4%, 64.5% and 43.4% volatility against 26.1%).
- Nearby categories and themes
- AAPL (Apple, computer hardware) and ADI (Analog Devices, semiconductors) were ahead of CSCO in most short and long periods.
- Whole market
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 46 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CSCO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT (Walmart), ABBV (AbbVie) and PM (Philip Morris International).
How much would $10,000 in CSCO have grown?
This chart tracks a hypothetical $10,000 investment in CSCO over the past 17 years, with dividends reinvested, alongside the same amount in the S&P 500, investments that ended ahead of CSCO over the same span and CSCO's popular alternatives, among those that traded for the entire period. A second view covers the past 5 years, the period the better options further down the page are judged on. It shows not only where each investment ended up but also how smooth or uneven the path was.
Note: The chart covers the past 17 years rather than CSCO's full 29 years, because most of its popular alternatives have not traded that long.
- $10,000 invested in CSCO at the end of September 2009 would have grown to $71,336 by September 2026, less than the $97,560 it would have become in SPY, an S&P 500 fund.
- Seven of the eight other investments on the chart ended ahead of CSCO, and NVDA finished highest, at $6,672,769.
Choose a period
From the end of September 2009 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 691 of the 1,927 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CSCO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- NVDA$7M+66,628% total · +46.6% a year
- AVGO$3M+28,927% total · +39.6% a year
- COHR$240,243+2,302% total · +20.6% a year
- CIEN$216,109+2,061% total · +19.8% a year
- FFIV$112,330+1,023% total · +15.3% a year
- VIAV$103,772+938% total · +14.8% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$97,560+876% total · +14.3% a year
- EXTR$76,608+666% total · +12.7% a year
- CSCO$71,336+613% total · +12.3% a year
- ERIC$15,251+52.5% total · +2.5% a year
From the end of September 2021 to the end of September 2026. The scale is logarithmic, so equal steps up the chart are equal percentage gains. Hover over a fund in the key to pick out its line. 621 of the 3,628 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that traded the whole period ended ahead of CSCO; the chart shows 5, closest alternatives first. The other 3 lines are popular alternatives, shown for context.
- LITE$116,261+1,063% total · +63.3% a year
- DELL$112,363+1,024% total · +62.2% a year
- NVDA$110,811+1,008% total · +61.8% a year
- ANET$94,783+848% total · +56.8% a year
- CIEN$68,511+585% total · +46.9% a year
- HPE$51,318+413% total · +38.7% a year
- PANW$49,770+398% total · +37.8% a year
- FTNT$30,603+206% total · +25.1% a year
- CSCO$22,737+127% total · +17.9% a year
- SPY (S&P 500)$19,000+90.0% total · +13.7% a year
CSCO at a glance
This section summarizes the key facts about the stock, its returns over periods from one to ten years and the risk it has carried, with dividends reinvested throughout. These figures serve as the baseline for every comparison that follows.
- CSCO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1990 was 89.3%, from March 2000 to October 2002. It took about 19 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
- Over 29 full calendar years, CSCO's best was 1998, when it returned 150%, and its worst was 2001, when it lost 52.6%. It lost money in 11 of those years.
- CSCO is 17.3% below its all-time high.
The company
- Market value
- $421B
- Industry
- Communication Equipment
- Price history from
- February 1990
Returns
- Past 1 year
- +53.8%total return
- Past 3 years
- +118%+29.6% a year
- Past 5 years
- +118%+16.8% a year
- Past 10 years
- +374%+16.8% a year
- Best calendar year
- +150%1998
- Worst calendar year
- −52.6%2001
- Losing years
- 11 of 29full calendar years
Risk
- Volatility
- 26.1%typical yearly swing, 5 years
- Sharpe ratio
- 0.73return per unit of risk, 5 years
- Worst decline ever
- −89.3%Mar 2000 to Oct 2002
- From its all-time high
- −17.3%below the peak
CSCO against the whole market
Where CSCO ranks among every stock and fund, and what across the market has done better.
How does CSCO rank among all stocks?
This section ranks CSCO on return, volatility, risk-adjusted return and worst decline against every stock worth at least $300 million with enough history. Where the comparisons with its popular alternatives show how CSCO stacks up against its peers, these rankings show where it stands in the market as a whole.
- CSCO's worst decline of the past 10 years ranks in the top 9% of the 2,187 stocks worth at least $300 million, where the top fell the least.
Ranked against U.S.-listed stocks worth at least $300M that have enough history for each measure, so the count changes from row to row; smaller stocks are left out. Lower volatility and smaller declines rank higher.
| Measure | CSCO | Rank | Standing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +53.8% | 500 of 3,287 | top 15% |
| 3-year return | +118% | 788 of 3,017 | top 26% |
| 5-year return | +118% | 587 of 2,893 | top 20% |
| 10-year return | +374% | 449 of 2,202 | top 20% |
| Volatility, 5 years | 26.1% | 418 of 2,893 | top 14% |
| Sharpe ratio, 5 years | 0.73 | 403 of 2,893 | top 14% |
| Worst decline, past 10 years | −42.0% | 199 of 2,187 | top 9% |
What has beaten CSCO on both return and risk?
Each dot is an investment, placed by how much it earned a year over the past 5 years (higher is better) and how much its price swung, its volatility (further left is calmer). CSCO sits where the dashed lines cross. Anything in the green box above and to the left earned more than CSCO with smaller swings, a better trade-off over this period on both counts. Past results are no promise, but a name in the box is worth a closer look.
- 23 stocks and 23 ETFs worth at least $500 million sit in the green region: each earned more than CSCO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings. That is 1% of the 3,633 screened. Few investments beat it on both counts.
- Among those with at least half CSCO's swings, CAH has the best return for its risk: 42.1% a year at 24.7% volatility, 5% less than CSCO's 26.1%, and a Sharpe ratio (return above cash per unit of volatility) of 1.55 against 0.73 for CSCO.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested, and volatility the annualized swing in daily prices, both over 5 years. Labeled dots are the strongest picks from the table below and the names called out above, colored by how close they sit to CSCO; faint dots are 32 more of the 46 in the green region (the strongest, one per fund family). 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million were screened. Hover over a dot for its figures.
- Popular alternatives
- Same and neighboring categories, and shared themes
- The whole market
- Others in the green region
- 5 with more than 1.6× CSCO's volatility are in the table only
Is there a better investment than CSCO?
Investments that beat CSCO over the past 5 years on return, volatility, drawdowns, consistency, crash losses or fees, from its popular alternatives out to the whole market.
- Among CSCO's popular alternatives, DELL, LITE and PANW were ahead of CSCO in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (54.4%, 64.5% and 43.4% volatility against 26.1%).
- Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AAPL (computer hardware) and ADI (semiconductors) were ahead of CSCO in most short and long periods.
- Few investments have done better on both counts: only 46 of the 3,633 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million earned more than CSCO with less volatility over the past 5 years, among them WMT, ABBV and PM.
How this works
The table below lists investments that beat CSCO over the past 5 years on at least one of these measures: a higher annual return with lower volatility, a higher annual return at similar volatility, a similar return with lower volatility, a higher Sharpe ratio with a smaller worst decline, a higher total return in most periods from 3 months to 10 years, or smaller losses in recent market crashes. It checks CSCO's popular alternatives first, then the rest of its own and neighboring categories, then every stock and fund worth at least $500 million, and shows the strongest few in each group. The full list of those with a higher return and lower volatility than CSCO follows the table.
Annual return is the annualized total return with dividends reinvested. Annual return, volatility and the Sharpe ratio cover 5 years; the worst decline covers the past 10 years. Green marks a better figure than CSCO's. "On the frontier" means no other option shown or tested earned more with less volatility. Funds that hold the same thing are shown once. Beyond the popular alternatives, nothing with more than 1.5× CSCO's volatility counts as better.
These figures cover the past 5 years. Green marks a better figure than CSCO's.
| Investment | Why it is better | Past 5 years | Downside | Long run | Fit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual return?higher is better | Volatility?lower is calmer | Sharpe?return per unit of risk | Worst decline?past 10 years | 10Y returntotal | Corr. with CSCO?lower diversifies more | Expenseper year | |||
| +16.8% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | +374% | 1.00 | — | |||
| +12.7% | 17.1% | 0.79 | −33.7% | +321% | 0.60 | 0.09% | |||
| Popular alternativesbest 5 shownThe investments people most often weigh against CSCO. 5 of 20 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +55.2% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | +3,701% | 0.51 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return in most periods | +57.3% | 64.5% | 1.03 | −66.9% | +1,904% | 0.31 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +31.9% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | +1,274% | 0.46 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +32.9% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | +483% | 0.58 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +20.7% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | +2,626% | 0.54 | — | ||
| Same and neighboring categories, and shared themesbest 5 shownEverything else in Communications Equipment and the categories next to it (Semiconductors, Electronic Components, Electronics Manufacturing, Computer Hardware), plus CSCO's specific themes. 5 of 83 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher return in most periods | +18.5% | 28.0% | 0.75 | −38.5% | +1,168% | 0.47 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +19.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 | −33.6% | +652% | 0.37 | — | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +33.4% | 36.9% | 0.97 | −45.3% | +1,665% | 0.53 | 0.35% | ||
| Higher return in most periods | +20.9% | 35.3% | 0.71 | −58.1% | +691% | 0.51 | — | ||
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF · Cybersecurity · Cybersecurity theme | Higher return in most periods | +14.1% | 26.1% | 0.64 | −33.9% | +454% | 0.66 | 0.58% | |
| The whole marketbest 8 shownEvery other stock and fund worth at least $500 million. 150 of 3,530 passed at least one test. | |||||||||
| Higher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periodsSmaller losses in recent crashes | +40.7% | 32.8% | 1.21 | −34.5% | +1,807% | 0.25 | — | ||
| On the frontierHigher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.17 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher return in most periods | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.18 | — | ||
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.20 | — | ||
NHCNational HealthCare Corporation · Medical - Care Facilities | Higher return, similar volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst declineHigher return in most periods | +32.0% | 28.5% | 1.12 | −35.3% | +394% | 0.21 | — | |
| Higher return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.9% | 18.9% | 0.97 | −26.4% | +218% | 0.07 | 0.25% | ||
LVHIFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF · International Equity | On the frontierSimilar return, lower volatilityHigher Sharpe, smaller worst decline | +17.0% | 11.1% | 1.48 | −32.4% | +194% | 0.21 | 0.40% | |
USLMUnited States Lime & Minerals, Inc. · Construction Materials | Smaller losses in recent crashes | +35.6% | 36.1% | 1.03 | −45.9% | +803% | 0.15 | — | |
What these numbers mean for CSCO
- Annual return
- CSCO returned 16.8% a year over the past 5 years with dividends reinvested, against 12.7% a year for the S&P 500. At that pace, $10,000 became about $21,800. Annual return is the steady yearly rate that would produce the same total result, so investments held over the same span compare fairly. Guide: What is performance and return? →
- Volatility
- CSCO's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.1%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CSCO's return lands within 26.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump. Guide: Understanding and measuring risk (volatility) →
- Sharpe ratio
- CSCO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.73, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CSCO earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings. Guide: Balancing reward with risk (Sharpe ratio) →
- Worst decline
- CSCO's worst fall from a peak to a low over the past 10 years was 42.0%, against 33.7% for the S&P 500. Losses and gains are not symmetric: climbing back from a 42.0% fall takes a 72.3% gain. Guide: Market crash risk and tail risk →
- Correlation
- Over the past 5 years, CSCO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CSCO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CSCO holding. Guide: Correlation and diversification →
Show all 46 stocks and funds worth at least $500 million that earned more than CSCO with less volatility
Out of 3,633 tested over 5 years. The strongest 36 are listed, best first, with funds that hold the same thing listed once.
| # | Investment | Found in | Annual return | Volatility | Sharpe | Worst decline | 10Y return | Corr. with CSCO | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole market | +42.1% | 24.7% | 1.55 | −46.1% | +349% | 0.17 | — | |
| 2 | Whole market | +26.1% | 23.4% | 1.11 | −45.1% | +603% | 0.18 | — | |
| 3 | Whole market | +21.0% | 23.4% | 0.94 | −42.9% | +242% | 0.22 | — | |
| 4 | Whole market | +20.8% | 22.6% | 0.96 | −25.7% | +508% | 0.20 | — | |
| 5 | Whole market | +22.4% | 22.3% | 1.02 | −46.3% | +347% | 0.09 | — | |
| 6 | Whole market | +24.2% | 22.8% | 1.07 | −32.4% | +406% | 0.08 | — | |
| 7 | Whole market | +17.9% | 18.9% | 0.97 | −26.4% | +218% | 0.07 | 0.25% | |
| 8 | EWTiShares MSCI Taiwan ETF · International Equity | Whole market | +20.4% | 24.2% | 0.89 | −38.9% | +468% | 0.50 | 0.59% |
| 9 | FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF · Technology | Whole market | +21.8% | 24.3% | 0.94 | −38.0% | — | 0.51 | 0.19% |
| 10 | SPMOInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF · US Momentum Equity | Whole market | +18.7% | 20.8% | 0.93 | −30.9% | +499% | 0.56 | 0.13% |
| 11 | ACTEnact Holdings Inc. · Insurance | Whole market | +20.5% | 24.3% | 0.89 | −20.2% | — | 0.17 | — |
| 12 | CRAKVanEck Oil Refiners ETF · Energy | Whole market | +19.8% | 20.9% | 0.97 | −58.8% | +336% | 0.13 | 0.61% |
| 13 | Whole market | +23.5% | 18.8% | 1.22 | −75.2% | +350% | 0.21 | — | |
| 14 | DBJPXtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF · International | Whole market | +20.9% | 19.2% | 1.09 | −31.3% | +348% | 0.40 | 0.45% |
| 15 | DXJWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund · International Equity | Whole market | +26.6% | 19.1% | 1.34 | −39.1% | +428% | 0.32 | 0.48% |
| 16 | Whole market | +26.0% | 23.8% | 1.09 | −63.3% | +379% | 0.18 | — | |
| 17 | Whole market | +18.6% | 24.3% | 0.83 | −52.0% | +317% | 0.19 | — | |
| 18 | Whole market | +19.9% | 22.3% | 0.93 | −42.5% | +361% | 0.30 | — | |
| 19 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.0% | 0.90 | −56.1% | +98.2% | 0.15 | — | |
| 20 | Whole market | +22.7% | 24.4% | 0.97 | −50.5% | +341% | 0.37 | — | |
| 21 | Whole market | +24.6% | 24.0% | 1.04 | −68.1% | +288% | 0.09 | — | |
| 22 | Whole market | +19.2% | 21.6% | 0.93 | −47.3% | +395% | 0.26 | — | |
| 23 | Whole market | +22.6% | 24.0% | 0.97 | −57.5% | +373% | 0.24 | — | |
| 24 | Whole market | +18.7% | 22.5% | 0.88 | −55.1% | +163% | 0.13 | — | |
| 25 | Whole market | +19.0% | 20.8% | 0.95 | −54.9% | +335% | 0.22 | — | |
| 26 | Whole market | +19.2% | 22.4% | 0.90 | −42.0% | +311% | 0.17 | — | |
| 27 | Whole market | +19.7% | 23.2% | 0.90 | −48.8% | +292% | 0.20 | — | |
| 28 | ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd. · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +20.1% | 24.5% | 0.87 | −53.8% | +309% | 0.05 | — |
| 29 | SDCIUSCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund · Bonds | Whole market | +20.6% | 18.4% | 1.12 | −45.7% | — | 0.05 | 0.80% |
| 30 | KOFCoca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. · Food & Beverages | Whole market | +22.3% | 24.7% | 0.94 | −55.1% | +119% | 0.32 | — |
| 31 | WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · Property & Casualty Insurance | Whole market | +18.9% | 22.9% | 0.87 | −45.3% | +443% | 0.06 | — |
| 32 | MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF · Energy | Whole market | +18.6% | 19.7% | 0.97 | −64.6% | +186% | 0.18 | 0.45% |
| 33 | IXCiShares Global Energy ETF · International | Whole market | +20.7% | 23.2% | 0.93 | −64.2% | +183% | 0.05 | 0.37% |
| 34 | EUFNiShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF · Financial Sector Equity | Whole market | +18.5% | 21.8% | 0.89 | −53.2% | +233% | 0.25 | 0.49% |
| 35 | EWPiShares MSCI Spain ETF · Broad Market | Whole market | +19.2% | 20.3% | 0.97 | −46.4% | +196% | 0.25 | 0.50% |
| 36 | ATMPBarclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN · Broad Market | Whole market | +21.2% | 21.5% | 1.01 | −70.3% | +172% | 0.18 | 0.95% |
CSCO against its popular alternatives
The investments people most often weigh against CSCO, compared period by period and year by year.
How do CSCO's risk and return compare with its alternatives?
This map plots each investment's annual return over the past 5 years against its volatility, the size of its typical price swings. Investments toward the upper left earned more for a smoother ride, and those toward the lower right earned less for a rougher one. The dashed lines cross at CSCO, which divides the map into what did better or worse on each measure.
- None of the 20 popular alternatives earned more than CSCO over the past 5 years with smaller price swings, so every higher return on the map came with a bumpier ride.
- Over the past 5 years, CSCO returned 16.8% a year, more than the S&P 500's 12.7%, with higher volatility (26.1% against 17.1%).
Green points earned more than CSCO with less volatility; red points earned less with more. Hover over a point for its figures. Total returns with dividends reinvested, annualized.
All figures
| Investment | Annual return | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | +58.0% | 51.9% |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | +57.3% | 64.5% |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | +55.2% | 54.4% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | +49.0% | 49.0% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | +48.3% | 44.5% |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | +45.2% | 52.6% |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | +32.9% | 42.2% |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | +31.9% | 43.4% |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | +31.6% | 66.3% |
| FN Fabrinet | +29.2% | 57.1% |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | +20.7% | 44.8% |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | +17.9% | 47.9% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | +17.1% | 30.8% |
| CSCO This pageCisco Systems, Inc. | +16.8% | 26.1% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | +16.8% | 48.8% |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | +14.4% | 49.2% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | +12.7% | 17.1% |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | +11.6% | 40.1% |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | +1.7% | 35.7% |
| NTGR NETGEAR, Inc. | −7.1% | 45.8% |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | −8.3% | 48.5% |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | −17.3% | 56.4% |
Has CSCO consistently beaten its popular alternatives?
This section compares CSCO with the investments people most often weigh against it, checking each one over eight periods from one month to ten years. Counting how often an alternative earned more than CSCO helps separate lasting outperformance from a single strong stretch.
- Five of the 20 popular alternatives, led by FTNT, DELL and PANW, outperformed CSCO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes.
- FTNT, DELL and PANW outperformed CSCO in every long-term period and in all but one short-term period, the most consistent record in the group.
- NVDA outperformed CSCO over all three long-term periods but in only one of the five short-term ones, so CSCO has had the better of it lately.
A green cell means the alternative earned more than CSCO over that period. "Qualified" marks those that did so in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods.
| Investment | Periods outperformed | Short term | Long term | Risk · 5 years | Fund | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Volatilitylower is calmer | Sharpehigher is better | Worst declinepast 10 years | Expense | Assets | Overlapsame sectors | ||
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. (this page) | — | −3.9% | −3.2% | +22.6% | +42.2% | +53.8% | +118% | +118% | +374% | 26.1% | 0.73 | −42.0% | — | $421B | — |
| FTNT QualifiedFortinet, Inc. | 5/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −2.5% | +6.6% | +107% | +119% | +101% | +203% | +156% | +2,626% | 44.8% | 0.65 | −38.3% | — | $125B | — |
| DELL QualifiedDell Technologies Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −19.6% | +21.3% | +127% | +265% | +217% | +636% | +800% | +3,701% | 54.4% | 1.08 | −59.6% | — | $294B | — |
| PANW QualifiedPalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −8.5% | −2.4% | +101% | +89.7% | +60.6% | +180% | +299% | +1,274% | 43.4% | 0.86 | −48.0% | — | $278B | — |
| HPE QualifiedHewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 4/5 short3/3 longAll-weather | −9.1% | +26.3% | +103% | +135% | +150% | +296% | +315% | +483% | 42.2% | 0.89 | −56.9% | — | $74B | — |
| LITE QualifiedLumentum Holdings Inc. | 3/5 short3/3 long | −13.8% | +7.4% | −8.1% | +113% | +411% | +2,029% | +863% | +1,904% | 64.5% | 1.03 | −66.9% | — | $75B | — |
| NVDA SemiconductorsNVIDIA Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | −4.8% | +6.6% | +7.4% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +425% | +884% | +13,019% | 51.9% | 1.14 | −66.3% | — | $5.2T | — |
| ANET Computer HardwareArista Networks, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −11.8% | +7.0% | +8.6% | +35.6% | +23.7% | +289% | +634% | +3,439% | 49.0% | 1.06 | −52.2% | — | $229B | — |
| CIEN Communication EquipmentCiena Corporation | 1/5 short3/3 long | −6.6% | −9.7% | −32.1% | +39.0% | +97.5% | +721% | +546% | +1,600% | 52.6% | 0.97 | −49.5% | — | $48B | — |
| COHR Hardware, Equipment & PartsCoherent, Inc. | 1/5 short3/3 long | −27.9% | −18.8% | −33.3% | +19.3% | +92.8% | +648% | +295% | +795% | 66.3% | 0.75 | −72.2% | — | $46B | — |
| AVGO SemiconductorsBroadcom Inc. | 0/5 short3/3 long | −7.8% | −11.4% | −16.0% | −3.3% | −3.5% | +305% | +617% | +2,380% | 44.5% | 1.11 | −48.3% | — | $1.6T | — |
| FN Hardware, Equipment & PartsFabrinet | 0/5 short3/3 long | −11.5% | −28.1% | −49.2% | −25.9% | −12.8% | +121% | +260% | +732% | 57.1% | 0.74 | −52.4% | — | $13B | — |
| UI Communication EquipmentUbiquiti Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | +3.2% | +13.8% | −43.9% | +7.3% | −17.3% | +434% | +95.9% | +1,194% | 49.2% | 0.52 | −72.2% | — | $37B | — |
| VIAV Communication EquipmentViavi Solutions Inc. | 2/5 short2/3 long | −4.1% | −11.9% | −22.2% | +91.3% | +164% | +359% | +127% | +376% | 47.9% | 0.58 | −62.9% | — | $8.5B | — |
| FFIV Software - InfrastructureF5, Inc. | 4/5 short1/3 long | +1.5% | +10.9% | +45.4% | +78.0% | +54.0% | +208% | +120% | +287% | 30.8% | 0.67 | −54.6% | — | $26B | — |
| ERIC Communication EquipmentTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 2/5 short1/3 long | +5.5% | +12.9% | −8.0% | +15.6% | +15.6% | +164% | +8.9% | +161% | 35.7% | 0.23 | −66.6% | — | $36B | — |
| EXTR Communication EquipmentExtreme Networks, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | −2.2% | −26.6% | +21.5% | +34.3% | +8.7% | +6.4% | +117% | +445% | 48.8% | 0.56 | −87.5% | — | $2.9B | — |
| CALX Communication EquipmentCalix, Inc. | 1/5 short1/3 long | +1.9% | −5.9% | −30.0% | −32.7% | −40.0% | −16.6% | −35.1% | +435% | 48.5% | 0.07 | −65.3% | — | $2.3B | — |
| NOK Communication EquipmentNokia Oyj | 1/5 short1/3 long | −17.5% | −10.2% | −14.3% | +40.3% | +60.8% | +211% | +72.8% | +123% | 40.1% | 0.47 | −62.6% | — | $49B | — |
| NTGR Communication EquipmentNETGEAR, Inc. | 2/5 short0/3 long | +3.2% | −1.3% | −14.5% | −5.6% | −30.0% | +109% | −30.7% | −29.3% | 45.8% | 0.06 | −78.4% | — | $623M | — |
| ADTN Communication EquipmentADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 0/5 short0/3 long | −8.7% | −43.3% | −62.7% | −24.2% | −28.3% | −8.7% | −61.3% | −59.8% | 56.4% | -0.05 | −82.0% | — | $536M | — |
How did CSCO do year by year?
This table shows each investment's total return in every full calendar year since 1997, along with where CSCO ranked among its popular alternatives each year. Annual results reveal how consistently each one kept pace with CSCO and how far its good and bad years diverged, detail that multiyear averages tend to smooth over.
- Among its popular alternatives, AVGO came out ahead of CSCO most often, in 14 of the 16 years both traded.
- CSCO finished ahead of the S&P 500 in 11 of its 29 full calendar years.
- Ranked against its popular alternatives each year, CSCO finished in the top quarter in five of 29 years and in the bottom quarter in three. In 2025, it ranked 11 of 21.
Newest year first. Green marks a year in which the fund came out ahead of CSCO; gray means the two finished within a fraction of a point. The rank row places CSCO among the alternatives that traded the full year; dark green is the top quarter and red the bottom quarter.
| Investment | Years ahead of CSCO | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO This pageCisco Systems, Inc. | — | +33.5% | +21.0% | +9.3% | −22.5% | +45.8% | −3.5% | +13.8% | +16.6% | +31.3% | +15.1% | +0.6% | +28.0% | +16.7% | +11.6% | −9.6% | −15.5% | +46.9% | −39.8% | −1.0% | +59.7% | −11.4% | −20.3% | +85.0% | −27.7% | −52.6% | −28.6% | +131% | +150% | +31.2% |
| Rank among alternatives | Top quarter in 5 of 29 | 11 of 21 | 16 of 21 | 12 of 21 | 9 of 21 | 12 of 21 | 19 of 21 | 12 of 21 | 10 of 21 | 8 of 21 | 15 of 20 | 12 of 18 | 5 of 17 | 11 of 17 | 7 of 16 | 6 of 15 | 11 of 13 | 8 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 6 of 11 | 2 of 11 | 8 of 11 | 9 of 11 | 6 of 10 | 3 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 6 of 10 | 7 of 7 | 2 of 7 | 2 of 6 |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 18 of 29 | +17.7% | +24.9% | +26.2% | −18.2% | +28.7% | +18.3% | +31.2% | −4.6% | +21.7% | +12.0% | +1.2% | +13.5% | +32.3% | +16.0% | +1.9% | +15.1% | +26.4% | −36.8% | +5.1% | +15.9% | +4.8% | +10.7% | +28.2% | −21.6% | −11.7% | −9.8% | +20.4% | +28.7% | +33.5% |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 11 of 16 | −16.0% | +61.4% | +19.7% | −32.0% | +142% | +39.2% | +51.5% | +61.2% | +45.2% | −3.4% | +1.6% | +60.1% | −8.8% | −3.7% | +34.6% | +84.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 5 of 9 | +11.2% | +53.0% | +95.9% | −26.6% | +51.3% | +42.6% | +5.1% | +8.6% | +47.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 8 of 13 | +1.2% | +23.4% | +111% | −24.8% | +56.7% | +53.7% | +22.8% | +29.9% | +15.9% | −29.0% | +43.7% | +113% | +7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 4 of 10 | +15.5% | +29.1% | +9.7% | +4.5% | +37.4% | −21.9% | +23.7% | −5.7% | +8.6% | +54.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 5 of 10 | +339% | +60.2% | +0.5% | −50.7% | +11.6% | +19.6% | +88.8% | −14.1% | +26.5% | +75.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 18 of 26 | +38.9% | +171% | +239% | −50.2% | +125% | +122% | +76.4% | −30.8% | +82.5% | +228% | +67.1% | +27.4% | +33.5% | −11.0% | −10.0% | −17.6% | +131% | −76.3% | +37.9% | +102% | +55.2% | +1.6% | +102% | −82.8% | +308% | +39.6% | — | — | — |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 8 of 11 | +18.6% | +87.7% | +94.1% | −15.6% | +97.9% | +42.9% | −3.5% | −10.5% | +143% | +24.2% | +28.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | 14 of 28 | +176% | +88.4% | −11.7% | −33.8% | +45.6% | +23.8% | +25.9% | +62.0% | −14.3% | +18.0% | +6.6% | −18.9% | +52.4% | +29.8% | −42.5% | +94.2% | +61.8% | −80.4% | +23.1% | +33.3% | −11.1% | −49.1% | +27.6% | −64.1% | −82.4% | +183% | +293% | −76.1% | — |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 16 of 29 | +94.8% | +118% | +24.0% | −48.6% | −10.1% | +126% | +3.7% | −30.9% | +58.4% | +59.8% | +36.0% | −22.4% | −3.6% | +5.4% | −20.8% | +45.8% | +66.5% | −37.5% | +9.3% | +56.3% | −15.8% | +64.8% | +60.6% | −6.9% | +13.4% | +51.0% | +156% | −67.2% | −8.4% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 14 of 16 | +50.6% | +110% | +104% | −13.3% | +56.5% | +45.0% | +29.0% | +2.2% | +48.2% | +23.6% | +46.1% | +93.4% | +70.0% | +12.0% | +3.0% | +55.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FN Fabrinet | 10 of 15 | +107% | +15.5% | +48.4% | +8.2% | +52.7% | +19.7% | +26.4% | +78.8% | −28.8% | +69.2% | +34.3% | −13.7% | +56.5% | −4.0% | −36.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 9 of 14 | +67.7% | +141% | −48.2% | −10.0% | +10.8% | +48.5% | +91.7% | +40.7% | +22.9% | +82.4% | +7.0% | −35.2% | +279% | −32.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 10 of 29 | +76.4% | +0.3% | −4.2% | −40.4% | +17.6% | −0.1% | +49.3% | +15.0% | +6.9% | +34.3% | −21.9% | +5.5% | −3.8% | +29.3% | −27.9% | +75.7% | +125% | −72.5% | −20.2% | −11.7% | −25.6% | −12.9% | +47.3% | −71.5% | −79.2% | −48.3% | +830% | +67.6% | +57.7% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 13 of 26 | +1.5% | +40.5% | +24.7% | −41.3% | +39.1% | +26.0% | −13.8% | +23.5% | −9.3% | +49.3% | −25.7% | +43.6% | −6.5% | −8.5% | −18.5% | +146% | +132% | −19.8% | −23.1% | +29.8% | +17.4% | +94.1% | +134% | −50.1% | +127% | −91.7% | — | — | — |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 11 of 29 | +24.0% | +33.5% | +13.2% | −44.4% | −7.2% | +38.3% | +0.1% | +35.2% | +16.7% | −36.4% | −18.1% | +2.3% | +25.5% | +3.4% | −9.5% | +28.7% | +20.9% | −30.3% | −40.7% | +18.8% | +10.6% | +77.8% | +162% | −87.1% | −53.0% | −31.7% | +177% | +29.3% | +24.7% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 14 of 26 | −0.5% | −5.1% | −3.7% | +16.6% | +128% | −6.5% | +20.8% | −51.3% | +149% | +23.3% | +15.6% | −49.4% | +91.8% | +24.7% | −5.5% | +7.7% | +22.7% | −33.9% | −15.5% | −11.8% | −27.5% | −9.2% | +120% | −74.7% | −67.0% | −6.3% | — | — | — |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | 7 of 15 | +51.8% | −20.2% | −36.1% | −14.4% | +169% | +272% | −17.9% | +63.9% | −22.7% | −2.2% | −21.5% | +3.9% | +25.4% | +18.9% | −61.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 13 of 29 | +50.7% | +34.6% | −23.9% | −24.4% | +59.3% | +5.2% | −34.9% | +29.7% | −0.3% | −27.8% | −8.4% | +3.0% | +105% | −11.5% | −50.3% | −16.0% | −14.5% | −58.2% | +93.4% | +13.5% | +20.0% | −6.1% | +12.0% | −36.1% | −43.0% | −8.6% | +219% | +251% | +21.6% |
| NTGR NETGEAR, Inc. | 11 of 22 | −12.0% | +91.1% | −19.5% | −38.0% | −28.1% | +65.8% | −24.1% | −11.4% | +8.1% | +29.7% | +17.8% | +8.0% | −16.5% | +17.4% | −0.3% | +55.2% | +90.1% | −68.0% | +35.9% | +36.4% | +5.9% | +13.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 13 of 29 | +4.3% | +13.5% | −59.9% | −16.3% | +57.4% | +54.4% | −5.2% | −43.2% | −12.0% | +32.4% | −19.3% | −18.0% | +40.5% | −34.2% | −15.9% | +62.7% | +54.2% | −29.1% | −4.4% | −22.5% | +57.6% | −37.7% | +98.0% | +28.8% | +20.1% | −58.7% | +181% | −33.4% | −33.7% |
Risk and diversification
How CSCO has fallen, how it held up in crashes beside the S&P 500 and its popular alternatives, and what moves independently of it.
What were CSCO's worst declines?
A drawdown is the decline from a peak to the lowest point before a new high. This section presents CSCO's five deepest drawdowns since it began trading in 1990, alongside the S&P 500's return over the same dates, and how long each took to recover. Together, these figures show how much an investor could have lost and how long it took to get back to even.
- In all five of CSCO's worst declines, the S&P 500 held up better over the same dates.
- Not every decline was the market's doing: CSCO fell 51.3% from March to July 1994, while the S&P 500 slipped only 2.1%.
- The slowest recovery came after CSCO fell 89.3% from March 2000 to October 2002; it did not regain that peak until August 2021, 19 years later.
Green means CSCO fell less than the S&P 500 over the same dates. Based on daily closing prices with dividends reinvested.
| During | CSCO fell | S&P 500, same dates | Peak | Low | Time to the low | Back at the peak | Time to recover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com bust | −89.3% | −45.4% | Mar 2000 | Oct 2002 | 2.6 years | Aug 2021 | 18.8 years |
| No named crash | −51.3% | −2.1% | Mar 1994 | Jul 1994 | 4 months | Apr 1995 | 9 months |
| No named crash | −38.0% | −1.1% | Jan 1997 | Apr 1997 | 3 months | Jul 1997 | 3 months |
| 2022 bear market | −36.7% | −24.5% | Dec 2021 | Oct 2022 | 10 months | Nov 2024 | 2.1 years |
| No named crash | −36.6% | −11.0% | Aug 1998 | Oct 1998 | 2 months | Nov 1998 | 1 month |
How did CSCO do in stock market crashes?
This section measures how far CSCO, the S&P 500 and each alternative fell from peak to trough during every major market crash since 2000. A smaller decline means an investment held up better, and comparing results across crashes shows whether that resilience was consistent or a one-off.
- Among its popular alternatives, AVGO held up best, falling less than CSCO in five of the eight crashes they both traded through.
- CSCO fell less than the S&P 500 in five of the ten crashes it has traded through. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when CSCO fell 29.1% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
Newest crash first. Each figure is the fund's deepest fall within the crash window; green means a smaller fall than CSCO.
| Investment | Held up better | 2023 regional bank crisisMar 2023 | 2022 bear marketJan 2022 | Covid crashFeb 2020 | Late-2018 sell-offSep 2018 | February 2018 volatility shockFeb 2018 | 2015 China and oil sell-offAug 2015 | 2011 euro debt crisisJul 2011 | 2010 flash crashMay 2010 | 2008 financial crisisOct 2007 | Dot-com bustMar 2000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO This pageCisco Systems, Inc. | — | −1.4% | −35.4% | −29.1% | −17.5% | −5.3% | −22.8% | −16.6% | −3.1% | −60.0% | −89.3% |
| SPY S&P 500State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 5 of 10 | −3.4% | −24.5% | −33.7% | −19.3% | −6.5% | −12.8% | −17.9% | −1.5% | −55.2% | −47.5% |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 2 of 8 | −4.9% | −30.6% | −36.5% | −29.0% | −4.4% | −50.2% | −23.0% | −4.1% | — | — |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 0 of 5 | −5.7% | −43.6% | −45.9% | −28.6% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 2 of 6 | −2.1% | −30.6% | −46.8% | −29.1% | −3.3% | −40.2% | — | — | — | — |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 1 of 5 | −7.2% | −30.5% | −45.3% | −27.4% | −9.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 0 of 6 | −6.5% | −36.3% | −28.7% | −40.1% | −5.0% | −34.1% | — | — | — | — |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 1 of 10 | −5.0% | −60.7% | −37.5% | −55.9% | −8.5% | −25.3% | −23.8% | −1.7% | −85.1% | −89.7% |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 0 of 6 | −1.5% | −36.6% | −31.2% | −31.2% | −6.1% | −36.6% | — | — | — | — |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | 3 of 10 | −2.9% | −48.4% | −22.4% | −11.8% | −4.7% | −31.7% | −41.8% | −5.1% | −89.5% | −98.4% |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 3 of 10 | −10.7% | −56.3% | −43.0% | −39.5% | −9.8% | −15.0% | −40.4% | −2.1% | −68.2% | −61.4% |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 5 of 8 | −2.8% | −34.3% | −46.8% | −15.2% | −4.5% | −21.6% | −26.7% | 0.0% | — | — |
| FN Fabrinet | 4 of 7 | −4.7% | −38.7% | −25.0% | −12.0% | −3.8% | −10.5% | −30.8% | — | — | — |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 2 of 6 | −3.5% | −26.5% | −22.7% | −17.6% | −14.4% | −26.2% | — | — | — | — |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 2 of 10 | −3.0% | −27.2% | −37.5% | −26.5% | −3.0% | −27.6% | −41.5% | −4.5% | −86.0% | −98.8% |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 1 of 10 | −5.6% | −42.7% | −32.1% | −24.7% | −5.5% | −35.0% | −31.6% | −3.7% | −59.2% | −96.8% |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 3 of 10 | −2.3% | −53.5% | −31.3% | −13.3% | −7.5% | −19.2% | −31.9% | −0.8% | −71.4% | −98.6% |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 0 of 10 | −4.6% | −43.9% | −71.0% | −23.0% | −26.4% | −46.8% | −30.5% | −4.8% | −75.8% | −98.0% |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | 1 of 8 | −7.8% | −56.1% | −44.0% | −21.9% | −2.4% | −34.3% | −64.5% | −10.3% | — | — |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 5 of 10 | −2.1% | −32.1% | −42.4% | −9.7% | −2.8% | −23.3% | −21.1% | 0.0% | −78.1% | −82.1% |
| NTGR NETGEAR, Inc. | 0 of 9 | −4.2% | −42.5% | −31.1% | −26.6% | −17.9% | −22.7% | −41.0% | −3.0% | −76.6% | — |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 6 of 10 | −8.6% | −28.9% | −45.4% | −43.5% | −2.5% | −13.2% | −26.6% | −0.1% | −52.3% | −81.1% |
How closely does CSCO move with the S&P 500?
Upside capture measures how much of the S&P 500's gains an investment kept in the months the market rose, and downside capture how much of its losses it took in the months the market fell. An investment that captures more of the gains than the losses has compounded ahead of the market over time. This section compares CSCO with its popular alternatives on both measures, and on beta (how strongly each has moved with the market), over the past 10 years.
- 14 of the 20 popular alternatives had a higher capture ratio (upside capture divided by downside capture) than CSCO's 1.06, led by DELL, PANW and CIEN.
- DELL took just 43% of the S&P 500's losses, against 96% for CSCO, while still keeping 154% of its gains.
- Over the past 10 years, CSCO captured 101% of the S&P 500's gains in rising months and 96% of its losses in falling months, with a beta of 0.97. Its share of the market's gains was slightly larger than its share of the losses.
Monthly total returns over the past 10 years, measured against SPY. 100% capture or a beta of 1.00 means moving in line with the S&P 500. Green marks a better figure than CSCO's: more upside, less downside or a higher capture ratio. Sorted by capture ratio.
| Investment | Upside capture | Downside capture | Capture ratio | Beta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO This pageCisco Systems, Inc. | 101% | 96% | 1.06 | 0.97 |
| DELL Dell Technologies Inc. | 154% | 43% | 3.59 | 1.13 |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 118% | 49% | 2.44 | 1.14 |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | 129% | 64% | 2.02 | 1.07 |
| ANET Arista Networks, Inc. | 174% | 91% | 1.92 | 1.40 |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 158% | 86% | 1.85 | 1.19 |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 248% | 140% | 1.77 | 1.83 |
| FTNT Fortinet, Inc. | 159% | 92% | 1.72 | 1.09 |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 162% | 101% | 1.61 | 1.24 |
| FN Fabrinet | 115% | 72% | 1.60 | 1.12 |
| VIAV Viavi Solutions Inc. | 98% | 76% | 1.30 | 0.97 |
| UI Ubiquiti Inc. | 150% | 125% | 1.19 | 1.35 |
| HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 116% | 102% | 1.14 | 1.31 |
| CALX Calix, Inc. | 96% | 85% | 1.14 | 1.40 |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 162% | 146% | 1.11 | 1.80 |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 87% | 84% | 1.03 | 1.04 |
| NOK Nokia Oyj | 63% | 72% | 0.87 | 1.01 |
| EXTR Extreme Networks, Inc. | 144% | 172% | 0.84 | 1.88 |
| ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 73% | 108% | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| NTGR NETGEAR, Inc. | 45% | 124% | 0.36 | 1.02 |
| ADTN ADTRAN Holdings Inc. | 47% | 150% | 0.31 | 1.46 |
What diversifies CSCO?
Correlation measures how closely two investments move together, on a scale from 1 (in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to -1 (in opposite directions). This section lists large ETFs and stocks whose returns have had a low correlation with CSCO's. Because such investments tend not to fall at the same time, pairing CSCO with them can reduce a portfolio's overall swings.
- Moving a fifth of the money in CSCO into LVHI would have cut the portfolio's volatility by 18% over the past 5 years and raised its annual return (+17.9% for CSCO alone, +18.2% for the mix).
- MCK made money in eight of the 11 calendar years in which CSCO lost money.
- Among large ETFs, LVHI, DXJ and EMLP have moved largely independently of CSCO over the past 5 years, with correlations of 0.32 or lower, and each still earned a positive 5-year return.
Only ETFs with at least $1.0B in assets and stocks worth at least $10B, with a correlation below 0.5 over the past 5 years and a positive return, are included, ranked by Sharpe ratio; funds that hold the same thing are shown once. The year columns are the years in which CSCO lost money. The last two columns show a portfolio that is 80% CSCO and 20% the other investment, rebalanced monthly.
ETFs
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +118% | 0.73 | −22.5% | −3.5% | −9.6% | −15.5% | −39.8% | −1.0% | −11.4% | −20.3% | −27.7% | −52.6% | −28.6% | 26.0% | +17.9% |
| LVHI InternationalFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 0.21 | +119% | 1.48 | +3.8% | −9.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.2% | +18.2% |
| DXJ InternationalWisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 0.32 | +225% | 1.34 | +6.0% | +3.9% | −16.1% | −1.8% | −20.8% | −7.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 21.7% | +20.2% |
| EMLP Broad MarketFirst Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 0.26 | +101% | 1.04 | +10.4% | −13.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.7% | +17.9% |
| HDV Dividend & IncomeiShares Core High Dividend ETF | 0.34 | +83.3% | 1.00 | +7.1% | −6.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.9% | +17.2% |
| FTLS Broad MarketFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.46 | +62.9% | 0.99 | −5.6% | +2.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.6% | +16.9% |
| DBEF InternationalXtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 0.45 | +85.0% | 0.96 | −5.1% | +2.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.9% | +17.5% |
| GLD CommoditiesSPDR Gold Shares | 0.07 | +126% | 0.96 | −0.8% | +24.8% | +9.6% | +29.3% | +4.9% | +30.4% | +17.8% | — | — | — | — | 21.3% | +18.7% |
| XLE EnergyState Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.07 | +177% | 0.93 | +64.4% | −32.7% | +2.8% | +21.9% | −39.0% | +36.8% | +40.1% | +33.8% | −14.8% | −18.2% | +24.4% | 21.7% | +20.0% |
Stocks
| Investment | Correlation | 5Y return | Sharpe | 2022 | 2020 | 2011 | 2010 | 2008 | 2007 | 2005 | 2004 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 80/20 mix volatility | 80/20 mix annual return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. (this page) | 1.00 | +118% | 0.73 | −22.5% | −3.5% | −9.6% | −15.5% | −39.8% | −1.0% | −11.4% | −20.3% | −27.7% | −52.6% | −28.6% | 26.0% | +17.9% |
| CAH Medical - DistributionCardinal Health, Inc. | 0.17 | +479% | 1.55 | +54.1% | +10.1% | +8.1% | +21.4% | −39.6% | −9.8% | +18.7% | −4.7% | −8.3% | −2.5% | +108% | 22.3% | +22.6% |
| CLS Hardware, Equipment & PartsCelestica Inc. | 0.32 | +3,143% | 1.47 | +1.3% | −2.4% | −24.4% | +2.8% | −20.5% | −25.7% | −25.2% | −6.4% | −65.1% | −25.6% | −2.3% | 26.9% | +35.3% |
| FIX Engineering & ConstructionComfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.28 | +1,636% | 1.46 | +17.0% | +6.7% | −17.0% | +8.7% | −15.2% | +2.1% | +20.1% | +40.0% | −9.4% | +73.7% | −71.1% | 24.8% | +31.4% |
| MCK Medical - DistributionMcKesson Corporation | 0.02 | +413% | 1.44 | +51.8% | +27.1% | +11.8% | +13.8% | −40.4% | +29.7% | +64.9% | −1.4% | −27.2% | +4.9% | +61.2% | 21.5% | +22.1% |
| MPC Oil & Gas Refining & MarketingMarathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.11 | +690% | 1.41 | +86.6% | −27.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.4% | +24.8% |
Common questions
What was CSCO's worst drawdown?
CSCO's deepest decline since it began trading in 1990 was 89.3%, from March 2000 to October 2002. It took about 19 years from the low to climb back to its old high.
What were CSCO's best and worst years?
Over 29 full calendar years, CSCO's best year was 1998, when it returned 150%. Its worst was 2001, with a return of -52.6%.
Is there a better investment than CSCO?
Among CSCO's popular alternatives, DELL, LITE and PANW were ahead of CSCO in most short and long periods, though with much bigger swings (54.4%, 64.5% and 43.4% volatility against 26.1%). Looking beyond its popular alternatives, AAPL (computer hardware) and ADI (semiconductors) were ahead of CSCO in most short and long periods.
Is CSCO more volatile than the S&P 500?
Yes. CSCO's volatility over the past 5 years was 26.1%, 1.5 times the S&P 500's 17.1%. Volatility measures how widely returns swing around their average: in roughly two years out of three, CSCO's return lands within 26.1% of its average, either way. The higher it is, the rougher the ride and the harder it is to hold through a slump.
What is CSCO's Sharpe ratio?
CSCO's Sharpe ratio over the past 5 years was 0.73, against 0.79 for the S&P 500, so CSCO earned less for each unit of risk than an index fund did. The Sharpe ratio is the return earned above cash for each unit of volatility: two investments with the same return are not equal if one got there with far bigger swings.
How correlated is CSCO with the S&P 500?
Over the past 5 years, CSCO's monthly returns had a correlation of 0.60 with the S&P 500. Correlation runs from 1 (moving in lockstep) through 0 (unrelated) to −1 (moving in opposite directions). They often move together: some diversification next to an index fund, but not a cushion. In the table, the correlation column measures each option against CSCO instead: the lower it is, the more that option would diversify a CSCO holding.
What are the best alternatives to CSCO?
Of the 20 popular alternatives we compared, five outperformed CSCO in at least 3 of 5 short-term and 2 of 3 long-term timeframes, with dividends reinvested: FTNT, DELL and PANW.
Did CSCO outperform the S&P 500?
CSCO finished ahead of the S&P 500 (SPY) in 11 of 29 full calendar years. In 2025, it returned +33.5%, against +17.7% for the index.
How did CSCO do in stock market crashes?
CSCO fell less than the S&P 500 (SPY) in five of the ten major crashes it has traded through, and further in five. The clearest case was the Covid crash, when CSCO fell 29.1% and the S&P 500 fell 33.7%.
What diversifies CSCO?
These had a low correlation with CSCO over the past 5 years and still earned a positive 5-year return: among large ETFs, LVHI (correlation 0.21), DXJ (correlation 0.32) and EMLP (correlation 0.26); among large stocks, CAH (correlation 0.17), CLS (correlation 0.32) and FIX (correlation 0.28). A correlation near zero means the two have moved largely independently.
How we measure
- Short-term periods are 1M, 3M, 6M, YTD, 1Y; long-term periods are 3Y, 5Y, 10Y. An investment outperformed in a period when its total return, with dividends reinvested, was higher than CSCO's. Returns within 0.5 points or 3% of CSCO's, whichever is larger, count as a tie.
- "Qualified" means outperforming in at least 3 of 5 short-term periods and 2 of 3 long-term periods. "All-weather" means outperforming in every long-term period and all but one short-term period.
- Popular alternatives are the funds and stocks most often compared with this one. We include only those that trade today, are not leveraged or inverse, and hold at least $200 million.
- Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns over 5 years, a measure of how much the price typically swings in a year. The Sharpe ratio is the return above cash for each unit of that volatility.
- A decline, or drawdown, runs from a peak to the lowest close before the next high. The worst decline ever uses all the price history we have; comparisons between funds use the past 10 years so that younger funds are judged on the same stretch.
- Sector overlap is the share of assets two funds hold in the same sectors. Correlation and the mixed-portfolio figures use monthly returns.
- Upside and downside capture follow Morningstar's definition: the compound monthly return in the months the S&P 500 rose (or fell), divided by the S&P 500's compound return in those months. Beta measures how strongly monthly returns have moved with the S&P 500. All three use the same window for every investment.
- Figures are computed from daily adjusted prices and update after each trading day. Past performance does not predict future results.
More research
Popular alternatives to CSCO
FTNTFortinet
DELLDell Technologies
PANWPalo Alto Networks
HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise
LITELumentum
NVDANVIDIA
ANETArista Networks
CIENCiena
COHRCoherent
AVGOBroadcom
NOKNokia Oyj